63
Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents, Incidents, Accidents and Near Misses Policy Document Reference No. KMPT CorG.017.08 Replacing document KMPT CorG.017.07 Target audience Trust-wide Author Patient Safety Manager Group responsible for developing document Trust-wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group Status Ratified Authorised/Ratified By Trust-wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group Authorised/Ratified On June 2016 Date of Implementation June 2016 Review Date June 2019 Review This document will be reviewed prior to review date if a legislative change or other event otherwise dictates. Distribution date November 2016 Number of Pages 57 Contact Point for Queries [email protected] Copyright Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust 2016

Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

  • Upload
    vudat

  • View
    223

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents, Incidents, Accidents and Near

Misses Policy

Document Reference No. KMPT CorG.017.08

Replacing document KMPT CorG.017.07

Target audience Trust-wide

Author Patient Safety Manager

Group responsible for developing document

Trust-wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group

Status Ratified

Authorised/Ratified By Trust-wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group

Authorised/Ratified On June 2016

Date of Implementation June 2016

Review Date June 2019

Review This document will be reviewed prior to review date if a legislative change or other event otherwise dictates.

Distribution date November 2016

Number of Pages 57

Contact Point for Queries [email protected]

Copyright Kent and Medway NHS and Social Care Partnership Trust 2016

Page 2: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

DOCUMENT TRACKING SHEET

Management of Serious Incidents, Incidents, Accidents and Near Misses Policy

Version Status Date Issued to/approved by Comments

2.1 Draft June 2011 Relevant staff for consultation Review & feedback

2.2 Draft 13/07/11 Policy Group Review & Feedback

2.3 Draft 26/07/11 Clinical Governance Group Review & Feedback

3.0 Approved 27/09/11 Clinical Governance Group Authorised for use

4.0 Approved 28/08/2012 Trust-wide Patient Safety Group

Authorised for use

5.0 Draft April 2014 Trust-wide Patient Safety Group

Review & Feedback

6.0 Approved March 2015 Trust-wide Patient Safety Group

Authorised for use

6.1 Draft October 2015 Patient Safety Manager Review

7.0 Approved November 2015

Quality Committee Ratified

7.1 Draft June 2016 Patient Safety & Mortality Group

Submitted for approval

8.0 Approved June 2016 Patient Safety & Mortality Group

Ratified

REFERENCES

Health and Safety (Consultation with Employees) Regulations 1996 SI 1996/1513

Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998

Department of Health. (1999). Health Service Circular 1999/198. The Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998: Whistle blowing in the NHS. Department of Health. Available at: www.dh.gov.uk

Health and Safety Executive. (2008). Consulting employees on health and safety: A brief guide to the law. HSE. Available at: www.hse.gov.uk

Health and Safety Executive. ‘What is RIDDOR?’ HSE website. HSE. Available at: www.hse.gov.uk

The National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) website offers further information and resources on incident reporting at www.npsa.org.uk. Incident reporting

� ‘Incident decision tree’ Online tool.

� Seven Steps to Patient Safety in Primary Care Trusts. (2006)

� National Framework for Reporting and Learning from Serious Incidents Requiring Investigation. (2009)

� National Reporting and Learning Service (NRLS) Data Quality Standards: Guidance for Organisations Reporting to the Reporting and Learning System (RLS). (2009)

� Patient Safety Alert: Update. WHO Surgical Safety Checklist. (2009)

� Questions are the answer! Seven questions every Board Member should ask about patient safety. (2009)

� Medical Error: What to do if things go wrong: A guide for junior doctors. (2010)

� Never Events: Framework – Update for 2010/11: Process and action for Primary Care Trusts. (2010)

Department of Health (2005). Independent investigation of adverse events in mental health services. London: Department of Health. Available at: www.dh.gov.uk

Page 3: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

Department of Health. (2004). Memorandum of understanding: Investigating patient safety incidents involving unexpected death or serious untoward harm: A protocol for liaison and effective communications between the National Health Service, Association of Chief Police Officers and Health and Safety Executive. London: Department of Health. Available at: www.dh.gov.uk and www.acpo.police.uk

Department of Health. (2006). Safety First. A report for patients, clinicians and healthcare managers. London: Department of Health. Available at: www.dh.gov.uk

Department of Health. (2010). The NHS Constitution: The NHS belongs to us all. London: Department of Health. Available at: www.dh.gov.uk

General Medical Council (GMC) (2008). ‘Raising concerns about patient safety: Guidance for doctors’. GMC website page. London: GMC. Available at: www.gmc-uk.org

Health and Safety Executive (2003). Work Related Death P16. Protocol and Guidance. HSE. Available at: www.hse.gov.uk

Health and Safety Executive (HSE). (2008). Involving your workforce in health and safety: Good practice for all workplaces. HSE. Available at: www.hse.gov.uk

House of Commons. (2009). House of Commons Health Committee: Patient Safety: Sixth Report of Session 2008-09, Volume I. London: The Stationery Office Limited. Available at: www.publications.parliament.uk

National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) and NHS Confederation. (2008). Briefing Issue 161: Act on reporting. London: NPSA and NHS Confederation. Available at: www.nhsconfed.org

National Screening Committee, NHS Cancer Screening Programmes (2010). Managing Serious Incidents in National Screening Programmes.

NHS Security Management Service. (2010). Security Incident Reporting System. London: NHS Security Management Service. Available at www.nhsbsa.nhs.uk

Patient Safety First. (2009). The ‘How to Guide’ for Implementing Human Factors in Healthcare. London: Patient Safety First. Available at: www.patientsafetyfirst.nhs.uk

Serious Incident Framework – NHS Commissioning Board – March 2013. Available at www.commissioningboard.nhs.uk

Serious Incident Framework (Supporting learning to prevent recurrence) NHS England Patient Safety Domain March 2015

RELATED DOCUMENTS

All Trust and health economy documents which relate in any way to this document

Current Reference code of document

Whistle-blowing / raising concerns KMPT.HR.002

Claims Management Policy and Process KMPT.CorG.014

Investigation of Serious Untoward Incidents, Incidents, Complaints and Claims Policy

KMPT.CorG.020

Health and Safety Policy KMPT.CorG.005

Infection Prevention and Control for Inpatient, Residential and Community Services Policy KMPT.CliG.005

Risk Management Strategy KMPT.CorG.012

Duty of Candour Policy KMPT.CorG.018

Health & Safety Risk Assessment Policy & Guidance KMPT.CorG.004

Learning From Experience Policy KMPT.CorG.011

Staff Support Policy KMPT.HR.044

Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults Policy KMPT.CliG.006

Safeguarding & Protecting Children & Young People Policy KMPT.CliG.030

Information Governance Incident Management Policy KMPT.InfG.028

Information Governance Policy KMPT.InfG.003

Page 4: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

SUMMARY OF CHANGES

1. The addition of a weekly Mortality Review Group

Page 5: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

CONTENTS

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ..................................................................................................... 1

1 INTRODUCTION .......................................................................................................... 2

2 INVOLVING PATIENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES IN INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS INCIDENTS 3

3 PURPOSE OF POLICY AND SCOPE ......................................................................... 4

4 SERIOUS INCIDENT – IDENTIFICATION AND RESPONSE ..................................... 6

5 SERVICE LINES INCIDENT REVIEW PROCESS ....................................................... 7

6 DUTIES, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - STAFF .............................................. 10

7 THE TRUST BOARD ................................................................................................. 11

8 THE EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR AND DIRECTOR OF NURSING & GOVERNANCE ................................................................................................................. 12

9 EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR (PATIENT SAFETY LEAD).............................. 12

10 NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS ................................................................................ 13

11 SERVICE DIRECTORS ............................................................................................. 13

12 SERVICE LINE ASSISTAINT DIRECTORS, LINE MANAGERS AND SERVICE LINE MANAGERS 13

13 THE QUALITY COMMITTEE ..................................................................................... 14

15 INFORMATION GOVERNANCE GROUP ................................................................... 15

16 TRUSTWIDE INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL GROUP ............................. 15

17 HEALTH, SAFETY & RISK GROUP ......................................................................... 16

18 LOCAL HEALTH, SAFETY & RISK MEETINGS....................................................... 16

19 SERVICE LINE SERIOUS INCIDENT LEAD ............................................................. 16

20 PATIENT SAFETY MANAGER ................................................................................. 16

21 INFORMATION RIGHTS MANAGER ........................................................................ 16

22 SUB CONTRACTORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS AND VISITORS ............................. 17

23 OUT OF HOURS AND ON CALL RESPONSES ....................................................... 17

24 STAFF/PATIENT/RELATIVE/VISITOR/CONTRACTOR COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT 17

25 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER NOTIFICATION ......................................................... 18

26 PROCESS BY WHICH TO RAISE STAFF CONCERNS ........................................... 19

27 MEDIA INVOLVEMENT .............................................................................................. 19

28 HOTLINE ARRANGEMENTS .................................................................................... 20

29 SAFEGUARDING ...................................................................................................... 20

30 INCIDENT & CAUSAL FACTOR ANALYSIS- THE PRIME REASON(S) WHY AN INCIDENT OCCURRED. ................................................................................................... 20

Page 6: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

31 INVOLVEMENT OF RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS AND MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING ........................................................................................................... 20

32 MANAGEMENT CLINICAL SI LEARNING REVIEW USING RCA METHODOLOGY AND INVESTIGATION REPORT ............................................................................................... 21

33 SUMMARY POINTS FOR DISSEMINATION OF LEARNING FROM A SERIOUS INCIDENT 22

34 IDENTIFYING ISSUES WHICH MAY BE OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE .............. 22

35 LEARNING FROM SERIOUS CASE REVIEWS (SCR) ............................................. 22

36 RECORD KEEPING AND CONFIDENTIALITY ......................................................... 22

37 EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (APPENDIX B) ................................................ 23

38 HUMAN RIGHTS ....................................................................................................... 23

39 MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS DOCUMENT24

40 EXCEPTIONS ............................................................................................................ 25

41 LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE ............................................................................. 26

42 LINKS WITH OTHER PROCEDURES ....................................................................... 26

APPENDIX A NEVER EVENTS IN MENTAL HEALTH .................................................. 27

APPENDIX B EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT ....................................................... 28

APPENDIX C ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS ................................................... 32

APPENDIX D ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE PROCESS FOR REPORTING ALL SERIOUS INCIDENTS, INCIDENTS, ACCIDENTS & NEAR MISSES INVOLVING STAFF, SERVICE USERS AND OTHERS .......................... 35

APPENDIX F REPORTING TO EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS ................................... 43

APPENDIX G SERIOUS INCIDENTS ............................................................................. 45

APPENDIX H SI LEAD REPORTING RESPONSIBILITIES ........................................... 46

APPENDIX I CLASSIFICATION OF INCIDENTS/ACCIDENTS FOR REPORTING INCIDENTS TO NRSL VIA DATIX ........................................................... 47

APPENDIX J SERIOUS INCIDENT QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST .................. 55

APPENDIX K HOW TO IDENTIFY A REPORTABLE INCIDENT FLOWCHART .......... 56

APPENDIX L HOW TO INVESTIGATE NON SERIOUS INCIDENT .............................. 57

Page 7: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

1

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Serious Incidents requiring investigation in the Trust are rare, but when they do occur, everyone involved must make sure that they follow the Trust’s policies that are in place to respond, investigate and manage such incidents. These measures are in place to protect patients and staff, ensuring that robust investigations are carried out, which will result in the Trust learning from serious incidents to minimise the risk of the incident happening again. This policy sets out the systems, processes and accountability within Kent & Medway NHS & Social Care Partnership Trust for the management and investigating all incidents and near-misses, whether clinical or non-clinical, including Serious Incidents and Notifiable Incidents, to promote high quality, safe, accountable healthcare, minimising risks to patients, clients, staff and the Trust and maximising available resources. When an incident occurs it must be reported to all relevant bodies and therefore, the policy applies to all organisations working within the Trust, including commissioned providers. All of those organisation who are part of the system have a responsibility to share information and learning with their partner organisations.

Accountability Our principal accountability is to patients and their families/carers, whilst supporting our staff. The immediate consideration following a serious incident is that the patient must be safely cared for, and their own, and other patients’ health and welfare, must be secured and further risk mitigated. Patients, families and carers, must be appropriately and fully involved in the response to the serious incident and staff must be assured that the Trust promotes and open, positive and non-punitive approach towards learning from all incidents.

Page 8: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

2

1 INTRODUCTION

1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses will occur. The aim of this policy is to support a robust safety culture throughout the Trust. This will improve the recognition and reporting of adverse incidents, including near misses, in order to facilitate wider organisational learning to enhance good practice and improve service quality.

1.2 It is important to encourage a reporting culture in which all incidents, however trivial they may appear, are formally reported. This enables the Trust to build a profile of the risks to Service Users, carers and staff and to the business of the Trust. By regularly reviewing patterns and trends in incidents, resources can be more effectively targeted. Services are also better placed to respond to incidents and manage underlying risks. This encourages a safer environment for all.

1.3 This policy describes the Trust’s continuing commitment to a Patient and Staff Safety Culture and ensuring a safe environment for all patients, staff and visitors accessing services and sites.

1.4 This policy applies to all staff within the Trust and wherever the Trust carries responsibility for the staff

it employs, including seconded, agency, bank and contracted staff, including those in commissioned services. All staff have a responsibility to familiarise themselves with this policy and procedure.

1.5 Kent & Medway NHS & Social Care Partnership Trust are committed to ensuring that there are

systemic measures in place for safeguarding people, property, NHS resources and reputation.

1.6 The Trust will:

1.6.1 Ensure that this policy is accessible and well publicised to Service Users, Providers, Carers and Staff:

1.6.2 Be fair to Service Users, Providers, Carers and Staff whilst dealing with concerns or incidents.

1.6.3 Adopt a reasonable and proportionate approach, whilst responding in a timely, conciliatory, open, transparent and sensitive manner that addresses the issues raised.

1.6.4 Ensure effective working relationships with other agencies involved with the same incident.

1.6.5 Maintain a balance between treating staff fairly and maintaining proper accountability for their actions; fostering a learning culture across the Trust and not a culture of blaming staff.

1.6.6 Be supportive to all those involved in the reporting and investigation of an incident.

1.6.7 Ensure that all incidents are fully and fairly investigated in a reasonable and proportionate manner, with an evidence based approach to any decision making as a result of that investigation.

1.6.8 Take all reasonable steps to satisfactorily resolve reported incidents.

1.6.9 Avoid protracted correspondence.

1.6.10 Avoid unnecessary litigation.

1.6.11 Ensure that the Trust’s Serious Incident Investigation procedure emphasises the importance of learning and service improvement as a result of the management and resolution of incidents.

1.6.12 Ensure that Service Users and Carers are able to raise concerns about incidents without fear of being discriminated against.

1.6.13 Outline the Trust’s performance monitoring of its Serious Incidents investigation process.

Page 9: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

3

1.7 The Trust Board and Non Executive Directors give their full support to staff who are systematic, effective and efficient in their reporting of, and learning from, all serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses.

1.8 Through a regular review of themes and trends it is expected that our organisation will continue to demonstrate a learning culture that actively promotes and improves patient, staff and visitor safety to all our sites. Incident reporting remains a fundamental tool of risk management.

1.9 Having a patient safety culture at the heart of all our decision making will support public confidence in our Trust and promote security.

1.10 Duty of Candour (please see Duty of Candour Policy)

1.10.1 New rules to toughen transparency in NHS organisations to increase patient confidence within the delivery of care has resulted in the Government creating Statutory Regulations relating to Duty of Candour. Candour means being open and honest.

1.10.2 Patients, or someone lawfully acting on their behalf, should as a matter of course be properly informed about all of the elements of their treatment and care and this should involve any incidents that result in harm. This means that as soon as practicable following an incident or as soon as there is awareness that a notifiable incident has occurred the health professional or Trust must:

a) Notify the patient within 10 working days of the incident complaint being known. (or someone lawfully acting on their behalf) that the incident has occurred.

b) Provide the patient with all the information available directly relating to the incident. Some investigations will take longer than 10 days, particularly incidents which occur with community patients. Provide reasonable support following the incident, in cases of a serious incident or complaint the Service Manager or nominated individual will act as a family liaison officer.

2 INVOLVING PATIENTS AND THEIR FAMILIES IN INVESTIGATIONS INTO SERIOUS

INCIDENTS 2.1 The Trust believes that patients and their families/carers are a critical part of learning from serious

incidents. The level of patient/family/carer involvement clearly depends on the nature of the incident, the patient and the patient’s consent for their family to be involved. Access to language and sign interpreters will be provided, as required.

2.2 Initially staff who are providing the patients’ care will meet with the patient/family/carer to talk through

the process of investigation and timescales and will invite the patient/family/carer to be part of the investigation and will identify with them their level of participation.

2.3 Unless there are specific indications to the contrary or the patient/their family requests other arrangements, a series of ongoing open discussions scoping the form of the investigation will take place between the staff providing the patients’ care and the patient and/or their relatives or carers.

2.4 Arrangements should be made for the patient and/or their family and carer to meet with the SI Investigating team to discuss potential areas for investigation and to be an integral part of the investigation process.

2.5 Patients and their families have the right to request information (Freedom of Information Act 2000) and access medical records (The Reuse of Public Sector Information Regulations SI 2005/1515).

For further information on the Duty of Candour and the Trust process for ensuring full compliance please refer to the Duty of Candour – Being Open Policy.

Page 10: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

4

3 PURPOSE OF POLICY AND SCOPE 3.1 Purpose of Policy

3.1.1 The purpose of this policy is to ensure a structured consistent, systematic approach to the effective management of serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses.

3.1.2 The policy will encompass identification and immediate response to incidents, reporting, investigation and review, the identification of root causes, implementation of actions and dissemination of learning. It will explicitly describe the responsibilities of all Trust staff, seconded and agency staff, and commissioned service providers in relation to the reporting, investigation and management of serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses.

3.2 The purpose of this policy is to also establish a clear framework for conducting investigations and to ensure that such investigations are undertaken in a manner that is consistent both with the rights of those who may be involved and the need to establish the facts accurately and expeditiously. We are an organisation who wants to learn from incidents, complaints and claims and develop safer systems and processes. This is an opportunity for staff to review their peers practice and to evaluate and recommend best practice, so that the Trust constantly improves and manages and reduces risk of harm to staff, patients and visitors to our sites.

3.2.1 The policy will ensure that any necessary changes in practice and environment are identified and implemented to continually improve safety. The lessons learnt will be disseminated throughout the Trust and embedded in good practice and safe systems.

3.2.2 The Trust operates a no blame reporting culture but staff through the investigation process will be held accountable for their practice.

3.2.3 Implementation of this policy will continue to improve the opportunities to learn lessons through both quantitative and qualitative data analysis, enable a continuing opportunity to learn from themes and trends that will support a robust safety and learning culture and embed improved practice throughout the Trust.

3.2.4 This document is informed by the latest guidance from the:

a) National Patient Safety Agency1,

b) The Health & Safety Executive2 ,

c) Department of Health3.

d) NHS South of England

e) Care Quality Commission4,

f) Counter Fraud and Security Management Service5

g) Trust Strategic and Operational Objectives

h) NHS Serious Incident Framework

3.2.5 This policy is required under Health & Safety legislation, National Patient Safety Agency: Seven Steps to Patient Safety and the National Framework for Reporting and Learning from Serious Incidents Requiring Investigation (2010, updated 2013) best practice (for definitive list of guidance, best practice, national guidance and legislation go to References section page 2).

1 National Framework for Reporting & Learning from Serious Incidents requiring Investigation, March 2010, National Patient Safety Agency 2 Health & Safety at Work Regulations 1999, Health & Safety Executive

3 Building a Safer NHS for Patients, 2001, Department of Health

4 Essential Standards of Quality and Safety, Care Quality Commission

5 Counter Fraud and Security Management Service

Page 11: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

5

3.2.6 The outcome of the policy will be that all staff will report all serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses within the described time scales and will take the opportunity to learn. This will enable the Trust to meet its principal objectives.

3.3 Scope of the Policy

Level 1 (near miss) Level 2 (minor

risk) Level 3 (moderate

risk) Level 4 (major risk)

Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe)

Incidents resulting in no injury or damage but potentially could have caused injury/damage/loss. Normally dealt with/investigated by the ward manager/Service Managers/front line staff.

Incidents resulting in very minor injury, Damage or loss. Normally dealt with/investigated by the ward manager or Service Managers/frontline staff

Incidents resulting In moderately serious injury , damage or loss. Requiring formal investigation by the Ward Manager or the Service Manager.

Incidents resulting in grievous harm/potentially life threatening to a person a substantial damage or loss requiring a formal investigation by the Service Manager in consultation with the Assistant Service Director.

Reportable to the Clinical Commissioning Groups, Major incidents resulting in life threatening events extremely serious harm or death, substantial damage or loss requiring a formal investigation by the Assistant Service Director. These incidents may necessitate an inquiry panel.

The following adverse events fall within the scope of this policy:

3.3.1 Adverse Incident/accident – Any unplanned and uncontrolled event which led/could have led to loss or harm for patients, carers, members of staff or members of the public.

3.3.2 Serious Incidents for investigation – Something out of the ordinary or unexpected, with the potential to cause serious harm or loss and /or likely to attract public and media interest that occurs on NHS premises or in the provision of an NHS or a commissioned service.

3.3.3 Near miss - any unintended or unexpected incident that was prevented by some form of intervention and so resulted in no harm but without the intervention may have resulted in harm to one or more persons

3.3.4 Security incident - thefts, deliberate damage to property etc.

3.3.5 Reportable injuries, Diseases or Dangerous Occurrences (RIDDOR) – these are defined in Schedules1, 2 and 3 of the RIDDOR (1995).

3.3.6 It applies to all incidents that;

a) occur on Trust premises or,

b) occur off Trust premises but involve persons employed by the Trust whilst on Trust business or,

c) involve any patient receiving care from the Trust where the incident is in some way linked to that care – including joint mental health services with local authorities or,

d) are unexpected deaths, apparent suicides, and homicides by former patients within 12 months of discharge.

3.3.7 Safeguarding Children

Where there is harm or potential harm to a child or young person, these policy guidelines must be considered together with Safeguarding Children Policy and procedures.

3.3.8 Safeguarding Adults

The policy guidelines should also be read in conjunction with the Trust’s Adult Safeguarding policy. Staff must always refer to the Kent and Medway Safeguarding procedures and local multi-agency procedures which can be accessed on the Trust intranet and which include details of local leads.

Page 12: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

6

3.3.9 Medication errors

Medication errors must be reported via the Trust incident reporting system.

4 SERIOUS INCIDENT – IDENTIFICATION AND RESPONSE 4.1 Immediate Action following a report of a Serious Incident

4.1.1 There are a number of actions which must be taken once the Incident has been reported and graded. It is important that staff adhere to timescales and that the appropriate line management is alerted to incidents. These actions, with timescales are detailed in Appendix D.

4.2 Immediate Response by the Organisation/Provider

4.2.1 The first priority is to ensure the needs of individuals affected by the incident are attended to, which includes any urgent clinical care to ensure the health, safety and well being of those involved.

4.2.2 As soon as practicably possible a safe environment should be re-established, all equipment or medication retained and isolated, and all relevant documentation copied and secured to preserve evidence to facilitate the investigation and learning. If there is a suggestion that a criminal offence has been committed, the Police must be contacted.

4.2.3 Early consideration must be given to the provision of information and support to patients, relatives and carers and staff involved in the incident. See Trust Being Open Policy which contains guidance on support systems available to patients/relatives/visitor/contractors. .

4.2.4 Safeguarding: If the incident raises adult or child safeguarding issues a safeguarding alert must be raised under the Trust’s established local processes. Other agencies which need to be involved in the management of incidents of this nature must be identified and contacted. See Safeguarding Adults and Children’s Policies. For internal/external stakeholders/agencies see Appendix E.

4.2.5 The Named Nurse and Doctor for Safeguarding Children will, on behalf of KMPT review and evaluate the practice of all involved health professionals, and provide an overview report to the Local Safeguarding Children Board. The local Safeguarding Children Board will then produce an overview report and executive summary for the case, including a multi-agency action.

4.3 Reporting Responsibilities and Timescales

4.3.1 Appendices F and G (flowcharts) outline the roles and responsibilities of all staff, together with the timescales for reporting incidents and where they should be reported to. The appendix can be printed off and placed with the Incident Reporting Forms.

4.3.2 All Incident Forms will be graded according to the relevant level, completed and reported by no later than the end of the shift or within the working day. Each incident will be investigated accordingly and this will be recorded on the Incident Form.

4.3.3 All incidents that are a Serious Incident will be reported immediately or as soon as is practicable following the incident. Each incident will be investigated through an Immediate Management investigation. This will then be reviewed by the Service Line incident review panel or via their internal governance structures.

4.3.4 Serious Incidents are to be reported via the STEIS database – see Appendix I for flowchart instructions.

4.3.5 All level 4 and 5 incidents should be immediately escalated through the line management route and notified to the Patient Safety Team prior to submitting the Incident Report.

4.3.6 In the event that a member of staff is unable to complete the form, the responsibility falls to the Line Manager to ensure the form is completed within the timescales.

Page 13: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

7

4.3.7 Also important is the immediate grading of the incident in terms of the type of incident and the level of risk rating. This information is attached at Appendix J and is for guidance only. Any incident must be graded according to the severity and this will determine at which level the incident will be reported.

5 SERVICE LINES INCIDENT REVIEW PROCESS

5.1 All service lines must have in place a process to over see the incident investigation process and to quality check any action plans that come out of incidents. They must also have a process in place to ensure that learning is disseminated across their service line and where needed across the trust as a whole. This may be archived via a serious incident review panel as part of the clinical governance process for that service line.

5.2 External Reporting of Serious Incidents

5.2.1 The Patient Safety Manager will be responsible for reporting externally and ensuring that the correct grading and level of investigation is undertaken, this is done in conjunction with the service lines leads for serious incidents see Appendix H. The Patient Safety Manager will ensure that all necessary communication and consultation is maintained with all stakeholders.

5.2.2 As part of the new registration requirements arising from the Health & Social Care Act 2008 the Trust is required to notify the Care Quality Commission (CQC) about incidents that indicate or may indicate risks to ongoing compliance to the registration requirements, or that lead or may lead to changes in the details about the Trust in the Commissions Register.

5.3 Investigation of a Serious Incident

5.3.1 Internal investigations of serious incidents should be completed as soon as possible after the event with a deadline of 60 days. However, within the 60 days time must be allowed for Service Line Scrutiny, Patient Safety Scrutiny and Executive sign off.

5.3.2 For all Serious Incidents the relevant service manager must ensure that an initial management report is completed within 72 hours. This is a short report and will describe the incidents and the manager first impression; recommendations can be made if there are obvious deficits in care that need to be immediately rectified. This report will not have an action plan.

5.3.3 The service manager who completes the initial 72 hour manager’s report will recommend to the service line assistant director of incident review panel the next level of investigation to be carried out this will either be a concise or comprehensive RCA learning review.

5.3.4 The service line assistant director or the service line incident review panel will arrange for a Service Manager from another service to carry out the review. In the case of a comprehensive learning review they will also write the terms of reference

5.3.5 Investigations should follow the NPSA guidance and identify both active (e.g. acts and omissions by staff) and latent (e.g. organisational or environmental issues) failures. Guidance and templates are available from the NPSA and although developed for the investigation of patient safety incidents are applicable to all types of serious incidents. KMPT has draft templates for both concise and comprehensive learning reviews.

5.4 When more than one service line has been providing a service to the service user the investigation will

need to be a joint piece of work and it is expected that a service manager from each service line will take part in the review

5.4.1 The Trust requires that all incidents have appropriate review and investigation relevant to their risk rating. All incidents should be reported via the DATIX system

Page 14: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

8

5.4.2 Incident reports received on DATIX will be reviewed by the DATIX team for missing or incomplete information.

5.4.3 Where investigations involve more than one organisation anything uncovered by local investigations that may be pertinent e.g. timelines, care/service delivery problems and causal factors should be communicated to the SI Lead to ensure full analysis of the incident of root causes to be determined.

5.4.4 An integral part of any investigation is to ensure that the views of the service user, carer and or relatives are sought as part of the investigation.

5.4.5 The investigator must ensure that feedback is given to all those that took part in the investigation including the patient, carers and relatives.

5.4.6 See Appendix F and G for Levels 1 – 5 flowcharts

5.5 Serious Incident Action Plan Development and Implementation

5.5.1 The Trust recognises the importance that every opportunity is taken to learn from investigations, developing action plans that are measurable to ensure that change is implemented in order to improve standards and safety.

5.5.2 Once an incident has been investigated, the Trust will ensure that an Action Plan is implemented and monitored that addresses root causes and that progress on the Action Plan is reported to the Board, and to Commissioners as part of contracting arrangements.

5.5.3 Action planning will include the name of the person responsible for ensuring that implementation has taken place with a clearly identified timescale and will include a column that identifies evidence that supports that change has happened. This may include minutes of meetings, audits, good practice reports etc.

5.5.4 The SI Investigator on completion of an investigation will make recommendations which will be presented to the Trust-wide Patient Safety Group. Once agreed, these recommendations will be taken by the Serious Incident Lead involved who will produce an Action Plan for presentation the following month. Each action will have an identified owner, a date of review/completion and a column for evidence that the action has been implemented and tested.

5.6 Monitoring of Incident Action Plans

5.6.1 Once an action has been identified an action plan will be produced and becomes the responsibility of the Service Director to ensure that the actions are implemented and completed. Progress against SI action plans are reported into the Trust-wide Patient Safety group:

a) Service Directors agree and monitor the Action Plans through their local governance meetings and are responsible for overseeing the dissemination of learning within their Service Line.

b) Directors must ensure that an audit trail is available for the Action Plans they are responsible for i.e. minutes of meetings where discussed, evidence of implementation of actions etc.

Page 15: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

9

5.6.2 Local Action Plans

This process, below, will ensure the continual reduction of risk:

Action Plans – Category

Who will monitor Reported to Process for ensuring continual risk reduction

Team or local actions plans

Service Manager, Ward Manager, Line Manager

Local Clinical Governance Patient Safety Group. Copy of action plan with evidence submitted for review and sign off

Following completion of actions, review and test that any changes are effective and embedded. Continue to monitor themes and trends and other related incidents. Review risk assessments in light of learning and update risk registers. Provide assurance through the local meetings.

Locality or Service Action plans

Assistant Directors, Service Directors

Reported to Service Line Clinical Governance,

Patient Safety Group

Following completion of actions, review and test that any changes are effective and embedded across the service. Continue to monitor themes and trends and other related incidents. Review risk assessments in light of learning and update risk registers. Provide assurance to Service Directors through appropriate meetings. Share completed actions with Learning From Experience Group. Quantitative data analysis will inform targets for ongoing risk reduction by service lines.

Trust-wide Action plans

SI Lead and Director with a lead for Patient Safety

Reported to Trust-wide Patient Safety Group

Monitor themes and trends and other related incidents. Provide assurance to the Trust Board. Share completed actions with Learning From Experience Group who will continue to monitor learning. Update Risk Register.

5.7 Closure of Serious Incidents (Checklist)

5.7.1 The NPSA guidance advises that a Serious Incident is considered to be CLOSED, only when the closure checkpoints below have been completed and submitted to the relevant body:

a) an appropriate investigation has been undertaken that identifies findings, based on root causes and recommendations;

b) a satisfactory Action Plan has been produced with action points to address each root cause recommendation and with a named lead and clear timescales for implementation;

c) lessons learned have been identified, along with partners or stakeholders with whom the learning has been shared;

d) full completion of the STEIS record covering the above points e.g. date investigation completed, population of RCA/Lessons learned field;

e) evidence demonstrates that each action point has been implemented specifically:

Page 16: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

10

f) for non-serious incidents, (local level 1-3,) evidence demonstrating that local monitoring arrangements are in place to ensure action points are going to be implemented is sufficient.

g) for serious incidents, (local level 4-5), evidence demonstrating that each action point has been implemented is required. The closure deadline is 60 working days

5.8 Local Closure

5.8.1 The Trust will close an incident when it is satisfied that:

a) the investigation, recommendations and action plan is satisfactory

b) local monitoring arrangements are in place and working efficiently

c) Lessons Learned have been disseminated and absorbed

d) Serious incidents must be reviewed by The Trust Wide Patient Safety Meeting and have received executive sign off.

e) Serious incidents must be signed off by the CCG prior to closure.

5.8.2 It is the responsibility of the service line to ensure that prior to closure of the incident that they have satisfied themselves that the actions above have been carried out and the actions and the action plans can be show to be completed and signed off either via a serious incident review panel or via the clinical governance meeting.

6 DUTIES, ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES - STAFF 6.1 The following outlines an overview of duties, roles and responsibilities for all staff. For details on roles

and timings and reporting requirements please see Appendix D.

6.2 ALL STAFF: Staff at all levels of the Trust has a legal duty to meet their responsibilities set out in this policy. This applies to all staff including seconded staff, agency staff and staff who are not directly employed by this Trust but work within our services,

6.3 It is the responsibility of all staff within the Trust to record, report and grade all serious incidents, accidents and near misses involving patients or Service Users in a timely manner, following the processes and procedures set out in this policy and in accordance with the specific timescales set out in Appendix D.

6.4 It is the responsibility of all staff to ensure that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

occurring for visitors or other workers, contractors on our sites are recorded, reported and investigated appropriately according to risk grading.

6.5 Where the incident involves a visitor, contractor or other person/people on Trust premises, an Incident Form must be completed by a member of staff, together with the person involved in the incident, if at all possible.

6.6 SERIOUS INCIDENT TIMESCALES: All incidents that are a serious incident will be reported immediately or as soon as is practicable following the incident. Each incident will be investigated through an Immediate Management investigation. This will then be reviewed by the SI Core Team.

6.7 INCIDENT, ACCIDENT AND NEAR MISSES TIMESCALES: All incident forms will be completed and

reported by no later than the end of the shift or within the working day. Each incident will be investigated accordingly and this will be recorded on the Incident Form.

6.8 STAFF SUPPORT – see Section 21.2): Staff will be able to access support following a traumatic

incident – see Staff Support Policy. The Trust operates an open and fair culture in which it is important to learn from adverse and serious adverse incidents and for staff to feel able to be honest and open. All staff however, will be held accountable for their practice.

Page 17: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

11

6.9 Investigations and reviews of serious incidents, incidents, accidents, near misses, ill health and

hazards will not be used as part of any disciplinary procedure. The Trust does not seek to blame individuals but will expect all staff to work to their professional Codes of Practice and Trust standards, policies and procedures.

6.10 The Head of Legal Services – will provide advice and support on all incidents with a potential for litigation or where an Inquest is required.

6.11 Communications Department – For advice/action on media handling for all complaints with a potential for media implications.

7 THE TRUST BOARD 7.1 The Trust Board has ultimate responsibility of ensuring that the Trust has a developing safety culture

and receives assurance through bi-monthly summary reports that all documented actions have been taken.

The Trust Board are responsible for ensuring that systems and processes are in place to undertake suitable and sufficient investigations so that learning and implementation can be demonstrated. They will receive assurance from the Integrated Audit & Risk Committee through Summary and Exception reporting. The Board will receive monthly SI Reports. They will demonstrate leadership in underpinning a learning culture by supporting staff in taking forward the Duty of Candour Being Open Policy, and by ensuring that the Trust continues to demonstrate improvements in service delivery and safety.

It is the Trust Board’s responsibility to ensure that staff feel safe to report that the information they share will be treated with respect and acted upon appropriately for the improvement of the safety and quality of health services

7.2 The Trust Board is responsible for monitoring and overseeing all serious incidents and any high

frequency, low risk incidents. The Board will be made aware of these by receiving monthly Serious Incident reports.

7.3 The Trust Board has overall responsibility to ensure that appropriate management of serious incidents,

Incidents, Accidents and Near Miss procedures are effective throughout the Trust. It has delegated responsibility for monitoring and review to the Quality Committee.

7.4 The Trust Board will receive an aggregated monthly report highlighting the significant themes and

trends from all Levels 1 – 5 incidents, and a Serious Incident Report. These reports will be mapped against the NHS South of England grading.

7.5 The SHA requires that the monthly report to the Board also includes the number of SI’s that remain

open at that point in time and reasons why.

7.6 Chief Executive

7.6.1 The Chief Executive has overall responsibility for ensuring that investigations are appropriate and effective and that learning is identified and disseminated across the organisation. The Chief Executive is committed to the Trust demonstrating slow and sustainable effective change based on learning from SI, Incidents, complaints and claims.

7.7 Medical Director (Designated Board Member) Lead for Patient Safety

7.7.1 Takes responsibility for ensuring that all incidents are managed and investigated appropriately according to Trust Policy and all external requirements and takes responsibility for sharing learning. Ensures that the Chief Executive and Trust Board are apprised of incidents that are Serious. As defined by the NHS Serious Incident Framework and reportable to NHS England and other external Stakeholders.

Page 18: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

12

7.7.2 Ensures that learning is demonstrable and evidenced and good practice is shared across the organisation.

7.7.3 Takes responsibility for alerting the Chief Executive and initiating the Memorandum of Understanding protocol

8 THE EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR AND DIRECTOR OF NURSING & GOVERNANCE 8.1 Must be notified of all serious incidents and is responsible for informing Board Members of all serious

incidents.

8.2 The Medical Director And Director Of Nursing & Governance will receive the Serious Incident reports

and aggregated reports for incidents, accidents and near misses at the Quality Committee.

8.3 The Executive Medical Director And Director Of Nursing & Governance will receive assurance that the

systems and processes in place are meeting all internal and external standards

8.4 Either the Executive Director of Nursing or the Executive Medical Director will be responsible for

signing off the serious incident as closed.

9 EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR (PATIENT SAFETY LEAD) 9.1 Takes the lead for patient safety and provides assurance to the Chief Executive and the Quality

Committee that the systems and processes relating to safety are meeting all internal and external standards.

9.2 Oversees and Chairs the Trust wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group and receives assurance from the Service Lines that safe systems and processes are embedded and effective.

9.3 Will report monthly to the Trust Board and the Quality Committee on serious incidents, incidents,

accidents and near misses.

9.4 Integrated Audit & Risk Committee

9.4.1 The Integrated Audit & Risk Committee on behalf of the Board will review the Incidents, Complaints and Claims report and will ensure that the investigation procedure is suitable and sufficient to identify the learning. They will ensure that lessons learnt have been shared across the organisation and implemented. They will receive assurance that underpins that change has been systematic and embedded throughout the Trust where it is appropriate to the learning. The will provide leadership and support to Service Line Directors in undertaking their programme in continuous learning, review, implementing and sustaining change and then evaluating the outcomes.

9.5 The Trust Wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group

9.5.1 The Trust wide Patient Safety Meeting Chaired by the Medical Director, is responsible for reviewing all RCA Reports and for ensuring that evidence is available to demonstrate the learning and to monitor and support local groups with the implementation of the action plans.

9.5.2 They will ensure that learning is disseminated across the Trust and actively support the continuous publication of best practice and examples of learning from SIs, Incidents,

Page 19: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

13

10 NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS 10.1 Non Executive Directors will be informed by the Chief Executive of serious incidents resulting in death,

permanent harm, and/or serious damage; or those incidents which prevent the Trust from delivering healthcare services and which may result in adverse media coverage or reputational damage.

10.2 Non Executive Directors will ensure representation, as appropriate, on the Trustwide Health, Safety &

Risk Group and meet its annual reporting schedule.

11 SERVICE DIRECTORS 11.1 Directors will ensure that their Service Lines or their areas of responsibility/line management identify

learning from serious incidents, incidents, accidents or near misses. This includes reporting on any themes and trends arising. This will form part of their report to the Trust wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group.

11.2 Directors are responsible for ensuring that changes are implemented to continuously improve patient

and staff safety, systems and processes are embedded and that the Trust meets best practice requirements.

11.3 Directors must ensure representation at the appropriate Trust Groups in accordance with the Terms of

Reference of those Groups.

11.4 The Director who is the lead for Risk receives alerts on all serious incidents and will inform the Chief

Executive and Non Executive Directors, as appropriate, as soon as is practically possible.

11.5 For the most serious incidents the service line director will draw up the terms of reference for the investigation and may appoint the investigators

11.6 Service Line Governance/Risk Management Groups

11.6.1 These Service Line Groups will retain responsibility for implementing local action plans and ensuring that there is a system of evaluation. They will provide evidence on service changes and improvements and evidence of the implementation of best practice. They will review and monitor their SI’s, Incidents, Complaints and Claims and will organise any additional investigations.

11.6.2 Service Line Groups will utilise the information gained from the analysis of reports and ensure that risk management and risk reduction strategies are put into place and share this information and evidence as part of their quarterly report or as an ad-hoc report should the situation arise where information needs to be disseminated urgently.

12 SERVICE LINE ASSISTAINT DIRECTORS, LINE MANAGERS AND SERVICE LINE

MANAGERS

12.1 It is the responsibility of all Line Managers to ensure that staff are briefed on their duties and that they have received training on completing the Incident Form, within the required timeframe and are aware of the serious incident reporting process.

12.2 For the serious incidents (Trust level 4 and some 5) the Service Line Assistant Director will draw up the terms of reference for the investigation and may appoint the investigators

12.3 It is the responsibility of the Line Manager to undertake the completion of the Incident Form is within the required timescales, in the event that a member of staff is unable to do so.

Page 20: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

14

12.4 Will manage the performance of staff within their Service Lines, to ensure that reporting and response times are met.

12.5 When a manager reviews an incident they will sign the incident report.

12.6 Where a manager undertakes a concise investigation they will complete the report and include their

name and title. If they are directly involved in the incident they will complete an Incident Form following this policy and procedure.

12.7 Will review their staff serious incidents, incidents accidents, near misses, ill health and hazards and

discuss at their Health & Safety groups. Learning will be recorded in the minutes and this will be shared in the Assistant Directors’ and Service Line Directors’ Clinical Governance (Patient Safety) meeting.

12.8 Will produce and review monthly data and annually identify any themes or trends. Learning will be

disseminated to local Health, Safety & Risk groups and highlight reports will be provided to the Trustwide Health, Safety & Risk Group that identifies learning and service changes to continue to improve patient and staff safety and ensure that learning is shared across the Trust.

12.9 Will use qualitative and quantitative data analysis to highlight any trends which may be occurring and

uncover any further need for intervention. Management Clinical SI Learning Review (using RCA methodology) investigations from serious incidents will also contribute to learning and development of safer systems of work and practice.

12.10 Line Managers will ensure that each service line is represented at the Trust wide Patient Safety and

Mortality Review Group Panel meetings.

12.10.1 Will ensure that lessons are learned and appropriate action taken to prevent reoccurrence.

12.10.2 Will ensure support for staff involved in any incident.

12.10.3 Will act as a senior contact for complex cases, ensuring that a ‘wise person’ approach is taken for decision making, ongoing communications and incident case management.

12.11 Will ensure that team members that have been involved in any incident are give feed back on any

investigation and the learning that has taken place.

13 THE QUALITY COMMITTEE

See Terms of Reference – on Trust website at www.kmpt.nhs.uk. 13.1 Has responsibility and the delegated authority to act on behalf of the Trust Board. Ensures all relevant

Board Committees are providing adequate assurance and appraises the Trust Board of quality, risk or performance issues.

13.2 Has overarching responsibility for risk management, including ensuring that all incidents, non clinical

and clinical are reported to external agencies within the relevant time scales.

13.3 The Committee will receive reports from other Trust Governance Groups, e.g. Health, Safety & Risk

Group, Patient Experience Group, Trust-wide Patient Safety Group and Information Governance Group.

13.4 Receives themes and trends from incidents, and serious incident reports and ensures actions are

taken as a result of trend analysis and that information is cascaded through out the Trust. Will receive Health & Safety Exception Reports on serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses, the learning identified and the changes that have been implemented.

Page 21: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

15

13.5 Ensures that the management of serious incidents, Accidents & near misses policy is in place and that an annual review of the policy is undertaken, based on best practice and Trust events.

13.6 Monitors and addresses non compliance with the Trust policy and procedures.

13.7 Has responsibility for monitoring the completion of action plans and the subsequent effectiveness of

any risk reduction measures introduced.

14 TRUSTWIDE SI & MORTALITY PANEL This will be a once weekly panel that will be chaired by the Patient Safety Manager The Trust reports the deaths of all service users on Datix. A Learning Review will take place for the vast majority, however, there may be cases where the Trust believes the death/reported Level 4/5 incident does not constitute a KMPT Serious Incident. Purpose of the panel:

• To provide oversight of all deaths occurring amongst all service users

• To make Trust decisions regarding which deaths/reported Level 4/5 incidents do not constitute a KMPT SI

• To improve the transparency of reporting levels of unexpected deaths in across all service user groups supported by the Trust

• To review service line allocation for complex cases that cross service lines/other organisation

• To highlight overdue SI Management Investigations (i.e. not completed on Datix)

• To highlight overdue responses overdue to CCG/NHSE queries

• To review ‘near miss’ incidents, ‘themed learning reviews’ & any other incidents in order to consider if they meet the Trust SI criteria

Please see full separate Terms of reference Appendix E

15 INFORMATION GOVERNANCE GROUP See Terms of Reference – on Trust website

15.1 Responsible for monitoring and managing the compliance of all Information Governance initiatives

across the Trust and provides assurance to the Integrated Audit and Risk Committee that all targets and governance requirements are met.

15.2 Monitors and manages the production of Information Management and Technology Business Continuity

Plans across the Trust.

15.3 Acts as the Trust’s IM&T Business Continuity Programme Board.

15.4 Ensures compliance with Governance targets including national standards (CQC Essential Standards

and the Information Governance Toolkit), local best practice (policy requirements and IT project implementations) and audit recommendations (South Coast Audit Data Quality and Audit Commission Fitness for Purpose).

16 TRUSTWIDE INFECTION PREVENTION & CONTROL GROUP

See terms of reference on Trust website. 16.1 Receives all alerts relating to infection, triage alerts and forwards to SI inbox for serious incidents. They

provide reports to the Infection Prevention & Control meeting.

Page 22: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

16

16.2 Trustwide Infection Prevention & Control meeting receives all infection related Serious Incidents, reviews and provides learning arising from investigation to the Trust wide Patient Safety and Mortality Review Group.

17 HEALTH, SAFETY & RISK GROUP

See Terms of Reference – on Trust website.

17.1 The Health, Safety & Risk Group will ensure that work is undertaken to support the embedding of changes the new way of working is sufficient to ensure the safety of patients, staff and anyone else accessing Trust premises or services.

17.2 The Service Lines Health and Safety Groups will provide quarterly reports to the Trustwide Health,

Safety & Risk Group through the highlight report process. This will contribute to the Health, Safety & Risk highlight report to the Integrated Audit and Risk Committee.

18 LOCAL HEALTH, SAFETY & RISK MEETINGS See Terms of Reference – on Trust website.

18.1 All DATIX alerts will be reviewed through the reports produced by the Health & Safety team at every meeting within each Service Directorate.

18.2 Data covering a year will be produced month on month to identify themes and trends and this will be

reviewed monthly. Learning from incidents, changes to service delivery, systems and processes will be contained in the highlight reports that Health, Safety & Risk Meetings report to their next level within the organisation up to the Service Directors.

18.3 Each Service Director or representative will be expected to report to the Trustwide Health, Safety &

Risk Group quarterly identifying themes and trends and learning arising from DATIX alerts and serious incidents, to ensure that all parts of the organisation have implemented changes.

19 SERVICE LINE SERIOUS INCIDENT LEAD 19.1 Takes responsibility for ensuring the coordination and reporting of all serious incidents Levels

4 and 5. Chairs the Service Lines Governance Panel and oversees all actions arising and ensures information is shared with all relevant parties, both internally and externally. This is undertaken in conjunction with the Patient Safety Manager

20 PATIENT SAFETY MANAGER 20.1 Has responsibility for reporting on STEIS6 and providing reports and updates to the Commissioners as

appropriate. Will alert the Medical Director or nominated other to any serious incident.

20.2 Maintains all relevant records and provides a report on Serious Incidents to the Quality Committee

monthly and Trust Board every other month.

20.3 Delivers serious incident training and maintains an expertise in Root Cause Analysis methodology and

provides support to those staff undertaking a Management Clinical SI Learning Review (using RCA methodology). Will ensure that investigations are undertaken.

21 INFORMATION RIGHTS MANAGER 21.1 The Information Rights Manager is the Trust Data Protection Officer who manages the Caldicott Office

which is responsible for ensuring the co-ordination and reporting of all incidents pertaining to breaches

6 STEIS: Strategic Executive Information System

Page 23: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

17

of information governance and which is covered by the Information Governance Incident Management policy.

21.2 The Information Rights Manager will receive all incidents relating to information governance. All

incidents are considered to be SI’s, this includes “any incident involving the actual or potential loss of personal information that could lead to identity fraud or have other significant impact on individuals” (NHS South East Coast). This is irrespective of any potential media involved and includes both loss of electronic and paper records.

21.3 The Information Rights Manager will ensure that SI information is shared with the Serious Incident

Lead and reports are compiled, aggregated and reported to the Information Governance Group according to the policy.

22 SUB CONTRACTORS, SERVICE PROVIDERS AND VISITORS

22.1 It is the responsibility of Kent & Medway Facilities as part of contractual processes to ensure that contractors are aware and comply with our incident reporting process. If the contractors are unable to complete an Incident Form then it becomes the responsibility of the nearest line manager to the site where the work was being carried out or the contract organiser.

22.2 When a serious incident, incident, accident or near miss occurs involving a visitor to the site, the staff

member or line manager within the site will complete the incident report form and ensure a copy is given to the visitor.

23 OUT OF HOURS AND ON CALL RESPONSES 23.1 When a serious incident, incident, accident or near miss occurs out of hours to either a contractor or

visitor this should be reported by Trust staff to the On Call Manager, if considered appropriate. The On Call Manager will make the decision whether to alert the On Call Director and complete the appropriate forms.

24 STAFF/PATIENT/RELATIVE/VISITOR/CONTRACTOR COMMUNICATION AND SUPPORT

The Trust is committed to the support of staff/patients/relatives/visitor/contractor that are subject to a serious incident, incident, accident or near miss.

24.1 Patients/Relatives/Visitors/Contractors Support

24.1.1 In the first instance support to patients/relatives/visitor/contractor will be offered by the Care Team involved. In the event that a Care Team is not involved then support will be offered by a designated person agreed within the Serious Incident process and the Service Director.

24.1.2 The manager where the incident took place will ensure that all necessary steps are taken to provide any appropriate physical healthcare needs and medical intervention.

24.1.3 As soon as is practicable, the manager after discussion with the SI Lead and Service Director will speak with the patients/relatives/visitor/contractor to determine the appropriate level of support needed. The Service Director or nominated other will then confirm this in writing and include any relevant information leaflets.

24.1.4 The SI Investigator with their permission will meet with patients/relatives/visitor/ contractor pre-investigation and outline the investigation process. See Being Open Policy/Duty of Candour Policy. The SI Investigator will be responsible for ensuring that written and verbal information is available at pre-agreed intervals.

24.1.5 At the conclusion of the investigation the SI Investigator and Service Director or nominated other will arrange to meet with patients/relatives/visitor/contractor and review the investigation, findings and action plan.

Page 24: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

18

24.1.6 Further agreed communications or contact will be the responsibility of the Service Director or nominated other.

24.2 Staff Support

24.2.1 It is recognised that many incidents and serious incidents may have a significant impact upon staff affected by the incident. It is important that arrangements are made to ensure the staff involved in incidents receive the necessary support and counselling and also receive appropriate feedback on the outcome of the investigation into the incident. All those involved in the process within the Trust should strive to remain objective at all times and to treat the investigation of each incident as a learning process.

24.2.2 Assistant Directors are responsible for ensuring staff named in incidents have access to support.

24.2.3 The Line Manager or their nominated deputy should offer immediate support and will commence debrief and reassurance to the affected staff. Staff should be offered the opportunity to access counselling services or the support of the Staff and Practice Support Team. Staff support will be offered on an ongoing basis until such time as the member of staff requires it. Records will be kept of any referrals. Senior Managers will meet with staff in other areas which may have been affected by the incident. Please see the Trust Staff Support Policy.

24.2.4 It should be noted that staff may be required to attend court hearings or Coroners Court which may be some considerable time after the event. Staff Support and Counselling Services will continue to be offered whenever staff should need it.

24.2.5 The Trust recognises that informal and mutual support from colleagues and/or peers in these situations are equally as important as the formal clinical supervision and debriefing process.

24.2.6 As well as the support identified within the Trust’s Stress Management Policy, the following support is available to staff:

a) Union Representatives

b) Work Place Colleague

c) Personnel Department

d) Occupational Health

e) Staff Support Service

f) It is essential that all staff involved in an incident are kept informed of progress and the outcome, including the sharing of the formal investigation response in as supportive a way as possible.

24.2.7 After completion of the investigation, all persons involved will be seen individually or as part of a team for feedback and discussions about continuing support will be implemented. Information to the rest of the organisation will be shared in the form of lessons learnt and implementation of action plans.

24.3 Internal sources of advice and support

24.3.1 Head of Legal Services – For advice on all complaints with a potential for litigation or involving inquests.

24.3.2 Communications Department – For advice/action on media handling for all complaints with a potential for media implications.

25 EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDER NOTIFICATION

Page 25: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

19

Serious Incidents will be reported to External Stakeholders where necessary and appropriate. See Appendix D.

25.1 All incidents that involve staff will be reported to the Counter Fraud and Security Management service. The Health and Safety team will ensure that incidents involving staff will be uploaded onto the security management service Staff Incident Reporting System (SIRS) database www.cfsms.nhs.uk.

25.2 All incidents relevant to the Health & Safety Executive reportable under the RIDDOR regulations will be reported by line managers. The Health and Safety team on receipt of incident report will check this has been completed. Please see Appendix K.

25.3 The Service Line’s Scrutiny Panel(s)/governance meetings and the Patient Safety Manager will identify when there is a need to involve external agencies following an adverse event or near miss. This will be based on the South East Department of Health guidelines, Health and Safety Executive and the principles of the Memorandum of Understanding:

25.3.1 All suspected homicides

25.3.2 All in suspected patient suicides of patients currently receiving a service

25.3.3 Media involvement

25.3.4 Serious Incidents that cross into other provider services

25.3.5 Death or serious injury through negligence

25.3.6 Death or serious injury of a member of staff

25.3.7 Equipment has significant failure causing serious injury or death

25.3.8 Criminal act

25.3.9 Death in suspicious circumstances (unexplained/unexpected)

25.3.10 Involvement of other agencies requiring other expertise level

26 PROCESS BY WHICH TO RAISE STAFF CONCERNS 26.1 The Trust recognises the importance of clear communication with staff that is documented and

transparent.

26.2 This policy and the Investigation of Serious Incidents, Complaints and Claims Policy will assist in informing staff about the process the Trust will take in reviewing serious incidents, accidents and near misses. The Policy distribution process will ensure that Managers bring any new policies to staff’s attention and there will be additional articles in the Team Brief raising awareness.

26.3 Staff can also raise concerns and report anonymously and directly to the following:

26.3.1 Care Quality Commission

26.3.2 Health & Safety Executive

26.4 24.4 Whistle blowing policy: The Trust always encourages staff to feel confident about reporting

any incident. For all staff there is access to the Whistleblowing Policy and further support can be gained from Staff Support or by using the “Green Button” on the Staff Zone on the intra net.

27 MEDIA INVOLVEMENT 27.1 Communications are a vital element of supporting and delivering effective management of serious

incidents. The Trust ensures that robust communication and media management arrangements are in place for both internal and external communication. In some cases serious incidents may lead to media

Page 26: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

20

attention which can be prolonged. The Trust will make every effort to ensure that staff are informed and supported prior to any media involvement (see corporate communication strategy).

28 HOTLINE ARRANGEMENTS 28.1 Initiation during office hours will be by the Chief Executive or Nominated Deputy and out of hours by

the Director on call, using the free phone number based at Trust HQ - 0800 587 6757

28.2 At the earliest opportunity (if during office hours this will be immediately) or if not within thirty minutes of receipt, information will be placed on the web site by Communications to provide information, access to the hotline and for the wider community to be able to record through e mail any concerns or requesting information, all records will be kept and form part of the final record.

28.3 Communications will ensure that the local/national media and the web site (by e-form) have information on contacting the Trust by national post. They will ensure that all post will be collected together and responded to by Communications in conjunction with the Senior Manager on duty supporting the hot line arrangement.

29 SAFEGUARDING

The Trust has specific policies in place for the safeguarding of Adults and Children and this is an integral part of training for all Trust staff. (Please see Safeguarding policies)

30 INCIDENT & CAUSAL FACTOR ANALYSIS- THE PRIME REASON(S) WHY AN INCIDENT

OCCURRED.

30.1 A Root Cause is a fundamental contributory factor. Removal of these will either prevent, or reduce the chances of a similar type of incident from happening in similar circumstances in the future.

30.2 A Causal Factor is something which can lead directly to an incident.

30.3 Responsibility for Causal Factor analysis post investigation

30.4 Where a causal factor is considered to be developing into trends or where a causal factor may result in other actions being deemed necessary a Management Clinical SI Learning Review (using RCA methodology) will be initiated. Terms of reference will be clearly identified for the Investigator/s. The Investigator/s will be sourced from a select number of RCA trained staff. Learning recommendations and actions from the learning review will be reported to the Trust-wide Patient Safety Group

30.5 Governance Task and Finish Group: If a number of SI’s have occurred in a particular geographical

area of a very serious nature or consistent themes are emerging from a particular team or incident type, a specific Governance Task and Finish Group will be set up. This will have formal terms of reference and report to the Quality Committee. The aim will be to embed actions and ensure cultural changes in the service are embedded and a decrease in patient serious incidents.

31 INVOLVEMENT OF RELEVANT STAKEHOLDERS AND MEMORANDUM OF

UNDERSTANDING 31.1 It is recognised that the Trust may have to involve other organisations in the investigation or that other

organisations may take the lead on the investigation process such as a Police Investigation. However, the introduction of the Memorandum of Understanding enables Trusts, Police, NHS organisations and the Health & Safety Executive to meet post incident and identify roles, processes and information sharing.

Page 27: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

21

31.2 The Memorandum of Understanding is a protocol for liaison and effective communications between the National Health Service, Association of Chief Officers and Health and Safety Executive. The protocol is used when investigating patient safety incidents involving unexpected death or serious untoward harm.

31.3 A Service Line Director has the responsibility for organising the initial meeting and inviting all relevant parties to attend to scope the investigation process, communication processes, information sharing protocol and to identify and agree the lead role/organisation.

31.4 Other Healthcare providers and Local Authorities will be invited to attend the initial meeting and the same scoping exercise will be undertaken following the principles of the Memorandum of Understanding as appropriate.

31.5 See 4.5 for External Stakeholders. This is not an exhaustive list and during the course of reporting the serious incident it may become apparent that other services or agencies need to be included and invited.

32 MANAGEMENT CLINICAL SI LEARNING REVIEW USING RCA METHODOLOGY AND

INVESTIGATION REPORT 32.1 It should be noted that feedback from the Management SI Clinical learning review, should be given

sensitively, appropriately and should include both positive feedback on areas of good practice as well as any constructive criticism and learning examples that may be available.

32.2 SHARING OF LESSONS LEARNT- See Learning from Experience Policy

32.2.1 The importance of learning from Serious Incidents is fundamental to developing quality services and minimising risk to patients, visitors, contractors, staffs and NHS organisations.

32.3 Summary Points for Dissemination of Learning from a Serious Incident Responsibilities For Sharing Learning

Learning Shared With Example of Communication Methods

Incident occurs Local: Patient and their family/carers directly involved in the incident if appropriate. Staff directly involved in the incident. Similar services/specialities to the service involved in the incident. Trustwide: Other departments with wider organisational applicability. Improvements in process, policy and systems. Learning from Experience Group

Meetings with patients and their families. Presentations at staff meetings. Team Meetings. E-bulletins and newsletters. Intranet. Website. Board papers. Local notice boards. Email. Internal alert systems. Meeting minutes. Incident reporting and investigation outcomes. Risk Management.

National Learning National: Sharing learning nationally, independent sector, other NHS, local authority, Commissioners. Strategic Health Authority: Making the public aware about learning from Serious Incidents.

Performance Management Review Meetings. Assurance mechanisms. Newsletters. Annual Quality Reporting arrangements.

NHS England Nationally: Other organisations across the region and other strategic health authorities. Media. Department of Health. Safeguarding Children Boards.

Regional Network Meetings. Local conferences, seminars, workshops. Periodic serious incident summary reports. Letters to Chief Executives. Press statements.

NPSA All relevant healthcare sectors. Central Alert System (CAS).

Page 28: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

22

CQC MHRA HPA HSE CFSMS

Professional networks, bodies and associations. Manufacturers and commercial enterprises. International Safety and Quality Networks.

Chief Executive bulletin. Conferences, seminars and workshops. Alert Guidance information newsletters. E-networks. Link Officers. Professional networks.

Professional networks, bodies and associations

Members Other networks and associations

E-networks. Letters to members. Newsletters and bulletins. Educational meetings.

33 SUMMARY POINTS FOR DISSEMINATION OF LEARNING FROM A SERIOUS INCIDENT 33.1 Learning from incidents is captured on every Manager Investigation report. This information is lifted and

collated for the Learning From Experience Group.

33.2 Each Service Line is expected to report to the Serious Incident Lead when cases can be closed

because they have evidence to support their action plan and that learning has been captured and shared through their Service Line. This information is also lifted and collated for the Learning From Experience Group.

34 IDENTIFYING ISSUES WHICH MAY BE OF NATIONAL SIGNIFICANCE 34.1 During the course of an investigation issues that have a national significance or where it is identified

that learning should be shared across organisations should be reported through the SI Lead who will ensure that this information is shared with the appropriate organisation,

34.2 During the course of the investigation issues that involve equipment, agencies or practice that may have national implications will be reported through the Trust’s External Reporting process.

35 LEARNING FROM SERIOUS CASE REVIEWS (SCR) 35.1 Executive representatives from the NHS are part of our local Safeguarding Children Board (SCB). The

Safeguarding Lead is responsible for ensuring that communication between the SCB and the Trust Board is maintained. A Serious Case Review (SCR) is undertaken to learn lessons and the SCB are responsible for commissioning each SCR and sharing the learning across the Trust. This is monitored at agreed review periods as to whether the lessons have been embedded. The SCB ensures that they receive regular progress reports from an SCR and take action if the delay appears unreasonable. See Safeguarding Children Policy for further information.

36 RECORD KEEPING AND CONFIDENTIALITY 36.1 All NHS Trusts are required to keep full, accurate and secure records (Data Protection Act 1998)

demonstrate public value for money and manage risks (NHS Litigation Authority, Information Governance Toolkit, Essential Standards). Compliance with this Policy and these legal and best practice requirements will be evidenced through information input into the electronic record, RiO.

36.2 Third Party Confidentiality

36.2.1 Only information which is relevant to the incident should be considered for disclosure and then only to those within the NHS who have a demonstrable need to know. It must not be disclosed to the Service User unless the person providing the information has expressly consented to the disclosure. Disclosure of information provided by a third party outside

Page 29: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

23

the Trust also requires the express consent of the third party. If the third party objects then it can only be disclosed when there is an overriding public interest in doing so.

36.3 Patient Confidentiality

36.3.1 Care must be taken throughout this Procedure to act in accordance with NHS regulations and guidance, together with the Trust’s Confidentiality Code of Conduct, the Data Protection Act 1998 and the Access to Health Records Act 1990.

36.3.2 The Service User’s express consent is not required to access information about him/her for the purpose of investigating an incident raised by the Service User. However, it is good practice to explain to the Service User that information from his/her health records may need to be disclosed to investigate the incident.

36.3.3 Investigation of an incident does not remove the need to respect a patient’s confidentiality and everyone working within the Trust has a legal duty to keep records confidential.

37 EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT (APPENDIX B) 37.1 All public bodies are required to have due regard to the aims of the general equality duty when making

decisions and when setting policies. KMPT will continue with the culture of conducting Equality Impact Assessment to ensure a good understanding of the effect of our policies and practices on people within different protected groups. This will facilitate the identification of areas of concerns and may develop practical courses of action to mitigate negative consequences or to promote positive ones

37.2 The Trust is positive in its approach to equality and diversity and the serious incidents policy and process is open to everybody regardless of their age, race, gender, culture, religion, sexual orientation or disability. This policy has been Equality Impact Assessed to ensure that staff and/or service users do not experience a negative impact or disproportionately positive impact as a result of the implementation of the policy.

38 HUMAN RIGHTS

38.1 The Human Rights Act 1998 sets out fundamental provisions with respect to the protection of individual human rights. These include maintaining dignity, ensuring confidentiality and protecting individuals from abuse of various kinds. Employees and volunteers of the Trust must ensure that the trust does not breach the human rights of any individual the trust comes into contact with. If you think your policy/strategy could potentially breach the right of an individual contact the legal team.

Page 30: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

24

39 MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH AND EFFECTIVENESS OF THIS DOCUMENT

What will be monitored How will it be monitored Who will monitor Frequency Evidence to demonstrate monitoring

Action to be taken in the event of non-compliance

Completeness of information on Incident Form as reported via the Datix system

Line Manager will sign to confirm risk rating and management actions Health & Safety Team will check for completeness of the electronic form

Line Manager Health & Safety Team

Each form All forms on receipt

Signature of Line Manager

Trends will be raised with Health & Safety

Manager

Datix forms that are not complete will be contacted by the Health & Safety team

National Reporting & Learning System reports

Through the Risk, Health & Safety Group and Governance & Risk Committee

Patient Safety Manager Six monthly

Reporting to The Quality Committee

Via reporting schedule for key committee/ groups Directorate meetings

Service Directors Medical Director Nurse Director

Monthly Medical and Nurse Director

Reports Minutes of meetings

Medical Director

Demonstration of learning from incidents and evidence of change

Through Clinical Audit and Effectiveness Team RCA Action group Learning from experience group.

Medical Director SI Lead

Learning from experience group

Minutes of meetings Reports re-audit/re-evaluation reports

Follow up with Service line Directors risks highlighted

Reporting within the timescales for Serious Incidents

Trust Wide Patient Safety Meeting

SI lead Monthly Board reports

Minutes of meetings and reports

Service Line Leads on the panel will take action through the Service Lines to ensure compliance

Staff are aware of how to raise concerns

Whistle blowing recorded on the HR data system and reported on a bimonthly basis to the Workforce Committee Concerns recorded in DATIX alerts and reported to Health & Safety Group

Director of HR Bimonthly Bimonthly report to the HR and Remuneration Committee

Workforce Committee will take the required action

Page 31: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

25

40 EXCEPTIONS

40.1 There are no exceptions to this policy.

39.1.1 A full Root Cause Analysis investigation may be held in any situation where there is a need to formally establish the facts surrounding any particular incident or occurrence. This may be following a Serious Incident, a complaint, an intimation of a legal claim or a cluster of SI’s, incidents, complaints and claims.

40.1.2 All Formal Complaints will be subject to an investigation using RCA techniques, however where the complaint:

a) crossed one or more teams,

b) has been reported as an SI

c) Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults,

d) Safeguarding Vulnerable Children

e) Was made against a member of staff that was subject to the disciplinary procedure

f) GMC Complaint

g) When a member of staff have received complaints there are one or more incident forms of a similar nature

h) Where a member of staff or staffs is the subject of a complaint/s and/or subject to one or more incidents that could be described as clusters

i) Where there is a complaint about a member of staff and on gaining preliminary information local knowledge gives rise to concern to the Complaints Mangers.

j) Service Line Directors or other members of staff have raised concerns

k) Where there is an opportunity to gather facts and identify learning that will help to reduce or manage risk and develop safer services

l) Clusters of complaints about individuals

Levels of Investigation

40.1.3 All serious Incidents will be subject to an initial 72 hour management report this will look at initial concerns and early learning it will also recommend if a further investigation is required.

A learning review using RCA will automatically be required for all serious incidents such incidents would include the following:

a) Where an un-expected Inpatient death has occurred

b) Homicide

c) All suspected suicides

d) Incidents of violence and serious injury to staff requiring hospital A&E care

e) Incidents where serious property damage has occurred and business continuity plans have been invoked

f) Any other incident that is likely to be highly publicised

g) Service Line Directors or other members of staff have raised concerns

h) Where there is an opportunity to gather facts and identify learning that will help to reduce or manage risk and develop safer services

i) Clusters of incidents that may be linked

This list however is not exhaustive and an investigation may be required in other situations where is deemed necessary to make a formal inquiry into the circumstances and to record the findings thereof.

Page 32: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

26

41 LEARNING FROM EXPERIENCE 41.1 Following an investigation, recommendations will be made and from this will be the development of a

‘smart’ action plan. The action plans will be reported into the RCA Action Group who will ensure that the lessons learnt and the action plans are shared in all the Trust Service lines.

41.2 A Trust Wide Action plan of themes and lessons learned is put together and information shared and

disseminated via the Learning from Experience Group. The Group will also ensure that articles go into Team Brief and through the MD Direct Newsletters identifying learning from investigations and how this has changed service delivery or practice. Summary reports, learning and actions will be posted on the web site for access by the wider NHS and the local population.

41.3 Learning will be shared with the wider community through the Trust website.

41.4 Other learning that needs to be shared across the NHS urgently will be reported to the NPSA and

alerted through the Patient Safety Alert system.

42 LINKS WITH OTHER PROCEDURES 42.1 This Procedure does not stand alone. It must, where appropriate be read with the following: -

42.1.1 The Claims Policy and Procedure

42.1.2 The Complaints Procedure

42.1.3 The Complaints Handbook

42.1.4 The Disciplinary Procedure

42.1.5 Being Open Policy

42.1.6 Management of Serious Incidents, Incidents, Accidents and Near Misses Policy

42.1.7 Stakeholder, Carer and User Involvement

42.1.8 Learning from Experience Policy

42.2 This policy will be used by all employees of the Trust

42.3 Employees will be informed on the policy and any changes via the Policy Manager using the Trust web

site.

Page 33: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

27

APPENDIX A NEVER EVENTS IN MENTAL HEALTH

Overdose of Insulin due to abbreviations or incorrect device Overdose refers to:

• When a patient receives a tenfold or greater overdose of insulin because a prescriber abbreviates the words ‘unit’ or ‘international units’ , despite the care setting having an electronic prescribing system in place

• When a health care professional fails to use a specific insulin administration device i.e. does not use an insulin syringe or insulin pen to measure insulin

Setting: All patients receiving NHS funded care. Failure to install functional collapsible shower or curtain rails Involves either;

• failure of collapsible curtain or shower rails to collapse when an inpatient suicide is attempted/ successful.

• failure to install collapsible rails and an inpatient suicide is attempted/successful using these non-collapsible rails

Setting: All mental health inpatient premises. Falls from poorly restricted windows A patient falling from poorly restricted window.

• Applies to windows “within reach” of patients. This means windows (including the window sill) that are within reach of someone standing at floor level and that can be exited/fallen from without needing to move furniture or use tools to assist in climbing out of the window.

• Includes windows located in facilities/areas where healthcare is provided and where patients can and do access.

• Includes where patients deliberately or accidentally fall from a window where a restrictor has been fitted but previously damaged or disabled, but does not include events where a patient deliberately disables a restrictor or breaks the window immediately before the fall.

• Includes where patients are able to deliberately overcome a window restrictor by hand or using commonly available flat bladed instruments as well as the ‘key’ provided.

Setting: All patients receiving NHS funded care

Chest or neck entrapment in bedrails Entrapment of a patient’s chest or neck within bedrails, or between bedrails, bed frame or mattress, where the bedrail dimensions or the combined bedrail, bed frame and mattress dimensions do not comply with Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) guidance Setting: All settings providing NHS funded healthcare, including NHS funded patients in care home settings, and equipment provided by the NHS for use in patients’ own homes. Misplaced naso- or oro-gastric tubes Misplacement and use of a naso- or oro-gastric tube in the pleura or respiratory tract where the misplacement of the tube is not detected prior to commencement of feeding, flush or medication administration. Setting: All patients receiving NHS funded care. Scalding of patients Patient being scalded by water used for washing/bathing

• Excludes scalds from water being used for purposes other than washing/bathing (e.g. from kettles)

Settings: All patients receiving NHS funded care.

Page 34: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

28

APPENDIX B EQUALITY IMPACT ASSESSMENT

Full Equality Impact Assessment (EIA) tool If you prefer not to use this tool – you can create a separate document that answers the following questions:

• What is being assessed and what are the intended aims and outcomes?

• Are there any partners/contractors (internal and external) that will be involved in implementation?

• Which groups are currently affected and could be affected in the future (stakeholders)

• Have you got data on staff, Service Users, clients, carers and families by equality strand in relation to the policy?

• Which groups (internal and external) have been consulted?

• Could the policy directly/indirectly discriminate? (refer to definitions in EIA guidance document)

• Is there an opportunity to promote equality and diversity?

• What actions will you take to remove any potential discrimination?

• How will the EIA be monitored?

General Information

1. Name/s of policy, procedure, or practice:

Management of Incidents, Accidents, Near Misses & Serious Incidents Policy

2. Directorate: Medical Directorate

3. Policy Owner: Patient Safety Manager

4. EIA Lead: Patient Safety Manager

5. Lead Manager/Director: Executive Medical Director

6. Date of screening: December 2015

7. Is this a proposed or existing policy, procedure or practice:

Existing policy

8. What are the overall aim/s or purpose of the policy, procedure or practice?

To reaffirm the management of incidents, accidents policy and procedures, to ensure that best practice is implemented and to enable the Trust to underpin its patient and staff safety culture.

9. Which groups of people will be affected by the policy, procedure or practice? E.g. particular Service Users, staff groups

All Trust staff, clients, contractors, visitors

10. Are any other Directorates/teams involved in the delivery of the policy, procedure or practice?

Yes/No: If yes, whom? All staff are responsible for incident reporting and compliance with best practice

11. Are any partner agencies involved in the delivery of the policy, procedure or practice?

Yes/No: If yes, whom?

Page 35: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

29

Data and Consultation

12. Do you monitor the policy, procedure or practice in relation to any of the following? NO

Complaints Eligibility criteria KPl’s Service Uptake User Satisfaction Other__________

13. If you answered yes to any of the above, do you collect this data broken down by any of the following? N/A

Age Disability Gender Faith Race Sexual orientation Other___________

14. What consultation with Service Users taken place on the policy, procedure or practice within the last two years? NONE

Who was consulted?

Summarise the findings

Race

Gender

Disablity Age

Sexual orientation

Relgion and Belief

Transgender

Carers

15. What consultation with staff groups has taken place on the policy, procedure or practice? NONE

Which groups? Summarise the findings

Race

Gender

Disability

Age

Sexual orientation

Religion and Belief

Transgender

Carers

16. Is there any other evidence to support this EIA that suggests any group may be affected differentially by this policy, procedure or practice? No evidence identified

Summarise and reference the evidence

Research reports

Consultations and surveys

Demographic data

Equalities monitoring data from local bodies (e.g. KCC or PCTs,

Page 36: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

30

charities)

PALS and complaints data

Audits and research reports

EIAs completed by national bodies and partners

Conclusions

17. Will the policy, procedure or practice affect any group differently? NO

If yes – can this be legally justified? (explain)

Race Gender Disability

Sexual Orientation

Religion and Belief

Age

Caring Transgender

18. Does the policy, procedure or practice miss any opportunities to promote equality?

Yes/No (complete Improvement Equality Impact Action Plan)

19. Does the policy, procedure or practice encourage disabled people to participate in public life?

Assessed considered not applicable

20. Does the policy, procedure or practice promote positive attitudes towards disabled people?

Assessed considered not applicable

21. Is there a need to gather more information than is currently available to assess the impact of the policy, procedure or practice

Yes/No (If yes, state what information is needed and how this will be collected)

22. Is it possible to easily modify this policy, procedure or practice to address any issues highlighted above? Please give details of how and when this could implemented

Yes/No: Assessed considered not applicable

23. The EIA has identified: (please tick)

No adverse impact (EIA complete)

Adverse impact that can be mitigated (detail in improvement/equality action plan)

More research/ consultation needed (detail in improvement /equality action plan)

Adverse impact that cannot be mitigated or legally justified (policy must be cancelled)

Race X

Gender X Disability X

Sexual Orientation X Religion and Belief X

Age X Transgender X

Caring X

Page 37: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

31

24. Additional comments 25. Improvements/Equality Impact Action Plan

Issue Action Required How will the impact/outcomes be measured in practice

Completion Date

Responsible Officer

SIGNED (or name if electronic): EIA Lead: Steve Norman Head of Department/Directorate: Executive Medical Director Equality & Diversity Team member: Completion Date: July 2015

Send the Full EIA to the Equality and Diversity Team [email protected]

Page 38: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

32

APPENDIX C ABBREVIATIONS AND DEFINITIONS

Patient Safety Incident Any unintended or unexpected incident which could have or did lead to harm for one or more patients receiving NHS funded care.

Root Cause Analysis A structured investigation that aims to identify the true cause of a problem, and the actions necessary to reduce or eliminate it

Human Error

Human error occurs when the actions and decisions of individuals result in failures that can immediately or directly impact patient safety

Harm Harm is defined as injury, suffering, disability or death. Causal Factors A Causal factor is something which can lead directly to an incident. Removal

of these factors will either prevent, or reduce the chances of a similar type of incident from happening in similar circumstances in the future.

External Agency eg Health Care Commission, National Patients Safety Agency Adverse Event An Incident Serious Incident requiring Investigation

is defined as an incident that occurred in relation to NHS funded services and care resulting in one of the following

• The unexpected or avoidable death of one or more patients, staff, visitors or members of the public

• Permanent harm to one or more patients, staff, visitors or members of the public or where the outcome requires life-saving intervention or major surgical/medical intervention, or will shorted life expectancy (this includes incidents, graded under the NPSA

• A scenario that prevents, or threatens to prevent, the Trusts ability to continue to deliver healthcare services, for example, actual or potential loss or damage to property, reputation or the environment

• Allegations of abuse

• Adverse media coverage or public concern for the Trust or the wider NHS

Clusters A number of SI’s, incidents, complaints and claims that are low risk but are an

accumulation in numbers Chronology of Events Time lining – the process by which information is placed in date and time order Retrospective record An account written at a later date and time. Barrier, defences and controls

A control measure that is designed to prevent harm to vulnerable or valuable persons, organisations or objects. These measures may be physical, human action, administrative or natural.

Causal Factors: The prime reason(s) why an incident occurred. A root cause is a fundamental contributory factor. Removal of these will either prevent, or reduce the chances of a similar type of incident from happening in similar circumstances in the future.

Never Event One of the core set of ‘Never Events’ as updated on an annual basis

• Currently including in patient suicide using non-collapsible rails

• Death by scalding

• Death by mal administration of Insulin

• Death by neck entrapment of bed rails Unexpected death where natural causes are not suspected. Trusts should investigate these to

determine if the incident contributed to the unexpected death.

Permanent harm harm directly related to the incident and not to the natural course of the patients illness or underlying conditions, defined as permanent lessening of

Page 39: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

33

bodily functions, including sensory, motor, physiological or intellectual. Prolonged pain and/or prolonged psychological harm

pain or harm that a Service User has experienced, or is likely to experience, for a continuous period of 28 days.

Severe harm any patient safety incident that appears to have resulted in permanent harm to one or more persons receiving NHS funded care.

Abuse: a violation of an individuals human and civil rights by any person or persons. Abuse may consist of single or repeated acts. It may be physical, verbal, sexual or psychological; it may be an act of neglect or an omission to act or it may occur when a vulnerable person is persuaded to enter into a financial or sexual transaction to which he or she has not consented or cannot consent. Abuse can occur in any relationship and may result in significant harm, or exploitation, of the person subjected to it. This is defined in No secrets: Guidance on Developing and Implementing Multi Agency Policies and Procedures to Protect Vulnerable Adults from Abuse (DH 2000), and Working Together to Safeguard Children: A Guide to Inter-agency Working states that “abuse and neglect are forms of maltreatment of a child. Somebody may abuse or neglect a child by ‘inflicting harm’ or by failing to act to prevent harm (DCSF 2006, p.37)

Hazard: Situation with a potential to cause harm Risk: The possibility that a specific adverse event will occur.

Likelihood: Probability that an event will occur.

Near Miss: An event with the potential to cause harm but on this occasion did not result in

harmful consequences Harm: An unwanted consequence of an incident that might affect the patients, users,

other people, staff services or the Trust.

Grade: Incidents are graded using a 5 x 5 grading matrix that takes account of severity of consequence in relation to the likelihood of an event occurring as described in the Trust as risk grading.

Investigation: The collection and analysis of the circumstances surrounding an incident to establish a chronology of events and make recommendations about actions to prevent a recurrence, known as Root Cause Analysis methodology.

Risk Reduction The management of risk to reduce the potential for harm Quantitative analysis of data

is a continual process which is supported by investigation made by the Information Analyst and SI Lead. Trust-wide Data is analysed quarterly and annually and reported to the Trust Board. The Trust Board receives a detailed breakdown and report of serious incidents on a monthly basis.

Abbreviation Meaning

NPSA National Patient Safety Agency

NHSLA National Health Service Litigation Authority

CFSMS Counter Fraud and Security Management Service

SI Serious Incident (known previously as Serious Untoward Incident)

SIRS Staff Incident Reporting System

CQC Care Quality Commission

RCA Root Cause Analysis

Page 40: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

34

NRLS National Reporting Learning System

RIDDOR Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences Regulations

STEIS Strategic Executive Information System

MHRA Medicines and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency

HPA Health Protection Agency

HSE Health & Safety Executive

RC Responsible Clinician

Datix Trust incident reporting system

STEIS Strategic electronic Information system

CCG Clinical commissioning Group

SCR Serious Case Review

DHR Domestic homicide Review

Page 41: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

35

APPENDIX D ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES IN THE PROCESS FOR REPORTING ALL SERIOUS INCIDENTS, INCIDENTS, ACCIDENTS & NEAR MISSES INVOLVING STAFF, SERVICE USERS AND OTHERS

Reporting the Incident; Reporting Timescales and Internal Communication

1. Individual responsibility and actions

2. Role of Line Managers

3. Role of Senior Managers

4. Role of Service Line Directors

5. Role of SI Lead and the purpose of the SI e-mail Inbox

6. Role of Executive Medical Director

7. Role of Service Line Directors including the Non Executive Directors.

1 INDIVIDUAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ACTIONS

Time scale Roles and responsibilities - Incidents

Immediate If you are involved in an incident this is what you need to do:-

Report incidents/accidents via DATIX.

All incidents must be risk rated (see risk matrix pages – section 8). This will determine which Levels (1-5) they are reported at.

Please review the classification of incidents/accidents list at appendix J.

As soon as practically possible following the incident and BEFORE the end of shift

Incidents, accidents, near misses – Levels 1-3 (appendix F)

Members of staff will complete the DIF7 1 form on Datix

The Manager will ensure that the form has been completed.

For all visitors and contractors to the site they will be supported by the member of staff or Manager to complete a DATIX DIF 1 form wherever the incident took place, within the expected timescale.

If out of hours report to the Manager on call and the Manager will contact the Director on Call as appropriate.

Immediate

As soon as is practicable

Internal: ensure any medical devices, medicines or equipment involved in the incident are removed and preserved.

If the following are involved please alert the appropriate Lead;

Medical Devices alert Medical Devices Manager

Medicines alert Chief Pharmacist

Equipment alert Health & Safety Manager/Back Care Advisor (hoists).

Before the completion of the end of shift

Complete the DATIX DIF1 form risk grade the incident using the 5 x 5 matrix, undertake an immediate investigation appropriate to the incident and risk grading to identify learning and any immediate changes to the service or environment and implement and send to Line Manager

Keep a written record of all actions and ensure any statements if required are completed. Ensure a factual clinical patient record is made in the notes. Start written record of all actions taken with timings

Inform Occupational Health of any staff injury. If the Police are contacted then the NHS Security

7 Dif 1: Datix incident form

Page 42: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

36

Management Service should be alerted. The Health and Safety team will provide a report via SIRS.

If appropriate and with the patient’s permission the person in charge will contact relatives/carers to inform them of the incident, the subsequent actions and the current circumstances of the patient. (ref: Being Open Policy and the Duty of Candour)

Reporting Serious Incidents using the Serious Incident Alert system – Levels 4 and 5 and complete an DATIX DIF 1 Form and alert line manager (see appendix F)

Immediate Ensure the safety and security of all staff, patients, and visitors to the site and take any remedial action.

Ensure that appropriate physical care if necessary is given or accessed through the Accident & Emergency departments.

Remove or isolate any equipment involved

Start written record of all actions taken with timings

If appropriate contact the Responsible Clinician (RC) and inform of the incident and any injuries. The RC will need to determine the immediate mental state of the patient in the event that the Trust and staff wish to pursue prosecution.

If out of hours to report to the Manager on call and the Director on call

2 ROLE OF LINE MANAGERS

Time scale Roles and responsibilities

Line Manager responsibilities and actions

Incident, accident and near miss Levels 1 – 3 (appendix F)

Within 48 hours

The Line Manager will review the Incident DIF 1 and will confirm the risk grading using the 5 x 5 matrix found in DATIX DIF 2 form.

The risk grading will determine whether a full Manager Investigation Report should be completed. All investigations will follow RCA principles – see Investigation Policy.

If the person completing the form deems the level of the incident to be Levels 4 or 5 the line manager will activate the SI process.

Action

Serious incident (see appendix F)

Immediate Ensure the safety and security of all staff, patients and visitors to the site and ensure any remedial action is taken.

Ensure that appropriate physical care, if necessary, is given or accessed through A & E Department.

Ensure any medical devices, equipment, medicine, involved is isolated, removed and preserved

Ensure written records of all actions with timings are taken.

Review with Line Manager/Service Director

Immediately or as soon as is practicable

Complete the SI Alert form and send to [email protected] e-mail address

Send a copy to the Service Director.

Ensure DATIX DIF 1 Form has been completed.

Members of staff involved will be expected to, and if considered appropriate, give patients involved the opportunity to complete a statement and contribute to the investigation.

Write a detailed statement of the incident including:

• An incident description

• Location of the incident

• The nature of the person reporting the incident

• Name(s) of those involved directly with the incident

• Name(s) and contact details of any witnesses.

Ensure a documented factual account of the incident is placed on the relevant records.

Page 43: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

37

Inform Occupational Health of any staff injuries.

With the patient’s permission the person in charge will contact relatives/carers to inform them of the incident, the subsequent actions and the current circumstances of the patient and share any immediate learning and also follow appendix G (supporting family and carers).

Before the end of the working day

Report staff absence or serious patient safety incidents through the Reporting of Injuries, Diseases and Dangerous Occurrences (RIDDOR) reporting regulations 1995 (see appendix J).

Ensure arrangements are in place for staff and patients involved, if appropriate, to debriefed.

Arrange access to patient records.

Ensure that all staff (including those off duty) is notified of any serious patient or staff safety incidents in their area/site/ward. This must be done prior to any Trust press release/media involvement.

Arrange staff debriefing and remind staff how to access staff support and make a record of this.

Seek support from the Security Management Service if considered appropriate for staff.

Service Manager and Service Director, with the Patient Safety Manager, will alert the Lead Director for Patient Safety who will advise the Chief Executive where necessary. The Chief Executive will apprise the Chairman as appropriate.

Within 72 hours

Contact Senior Manager and discuss and identify appropriate roles within the Duty of Candour Policy

Undertake an Immediate Management Investigation and ensure that this is recorded on the DATIX system using the DIFF 2 managers form.

Collect copies of statements and review as part of the Immediate Management investigation and identify any learning or underlying root causes. Complete an Immediate Management investigation DIF 2.

Ensure the incident risk rating has been re-assessed. .

Ensure that changes to services or service delivery or the environment are implemented as soon as is practicable.

Review appropriate risk assessments and risk register and update. Send copies to Line Manager to share with the Service Directors.

Monthly Review all electronic Datix alert forms and Serious Incidents at the Health, Safety & Risk Meetings. Review trends, identify any learning and share with colleagues, ensure risk assessments and risk registers are changed and updated appropriately

Ensure incidents are reviewed in Supervision with the relevant staff member and learning shared.

Out of hours • Receive Serious Incident information and determine response.

• Ensure the immediate safety and well being of the staff and patients

• Gather information and determine whether this can wait until the next morning or the next working day or whether it should be reported to the Director on-call.

• Agree any immediate actions to be taken to ensure the continuing safety of staff and patients and any other party accessing the site.

• Information gathered and recorded must be included in the Immediate Management Investigation.

• Ensure that risk information is shared with all site users.

3 ROLE OF SENIOR MANAGERS

Time scale Roles and responsibilities

Actions – Incidents Levels 1 – 3 (see appendix E)

Immediate If there is any immediate learning that needs to shared with the rest of the service, take to the next Service Management Team meeting.

Page 44: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

38

Health, Safety & Risk Meetings

Review all DIF 1 incident alert forms, ensure all appropriate actions and learning have been taken and change where appropriate has occurred and evidence is in place,

review quarterly trends (8 – 15) amber rated risks and identified learning,

review 6 monthly (1 – 6) green rated risks and identified learning including service or environmental changes and include in the Highlight report shared at the Risk, Health, Safety & Risk Meetings.

This is guidance only and will be left to the Senior Managers to determine frequency of review however they must be evidenced by at least the timescales outlined above.

Actions – Serious Incidents, (see appendix E and appendix F)

Immediate Receive appropriate SI Alert

Provide any immediate support to staff, patients and any other visitor to the Trust site.

Arrange additional staff cover and ensure business continuity where appropriate.

Ensure Service Director and SI Lead(s) are apprised of the situation or circumstances.

Ensure debriefing is available for staff and remind staff through that debriefing about access to staff support

As soon as is practicable

Communicate with the local Line Manager and identify roles within the Being Open Policy and support the Local Managers in undertaking the process

4 ROLE OF SERVICE LINE DIRECTORS

As soon as is practicable

Receive alert on Serious Incident and liaise with Service Manager and provide any additional support needed to ensure safety and wellbeing. To consider whether a site visit is appropriate.

Within 4 hours To liaise with the Lead Director for Patient Safety and Chief Executive.

Service Directors, with the Chief Executive and Head of Communications will ensure that all staff associated with the incident or who work on the site are made aware of any media attention prior to the release of information. Consideration should be given to alerting the local community/Commissioners/Department of Health/Local Authority.

Monthly To review all incidents Levels 1 – 5 within Service Line Governance meetings.

Monitor the implementation of Action Plans and share Learning From Trust forums. Apply lessons learnt to improve patient safety. Receive Risk Assessments and Risk Register updates.

5 ROLE OF SI LEAD

Timescale Roles and responsibilities

Actions

As soon as is practicably possible

Receive the SI Alert and review the information and ensure information is recorded on DATIX.

Maintain the database and ensure information is accurate and available

Brief the Medical Director

To provide any immediate risk management support as advised by the Service Director or Assistant Director to ensure the safety and well being of staff, patients and other visitors to the site.

To ensure that information is shared appropriately

Within two working days of the incident occurring

To brief the Commissioners and KCC and Communications as appropriate and ensure that the STEIS system has been updated and the NPSA web site as appropriate. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/report-a-patient-safety-incident/

Within 72 hours To receive the Immediate Management Investigation report. To ensure all information is available for review and the decision making process. Update the Commissioners with any additional information.

Monthly To provide monthly reports and updates to the Board

Page 45: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

39

Quarterly To review trends and themes and ensure reports outlining the learning from the reviews are reported to the Trust Board

To undertake Management Clinical SI Learning Review investigations using root cause analysis methodology

To oversee and manage the SI Learning Review investigation process and ensure they are fit for purpose

To ensure learning is disseminated across the organisation.

6 ROLE OF EXECUTIVE MEDICAL DIRECTOR Time scale Roles & Responsibilities

As soon as is practicable

Is kept apprised of any serious patient safety related incident and is responsible for informing the Chief Executive and Trust Board.

Bi-monthly Presents Serious Incident Report to the Trust Board and provides assurance to the Chief Executive and the Trust Board that the systems and processes relating to safety are meeting all internal and external standards. Receives alerts on Serious Incidents and informs the Chief Executive and Non Executive Directors as appropriate.

Bi-monthly Receives assurance from the Service Lines that safe systems and processes are embedded and effective.

7 ROLE OF SERVICE LINE DIRECTORS INCLUDING THE NON EXECUTIVE DIRECTORS

Time Scale Roles & Responsibilities

All Directors and Non Executive Directors are expected to complete DATIX DIF 1forms when they are involved in incidents, accidents and near misses.

All Directors should be actively involved in reviewing incident trends for their areas of responsibility and setting objectives.

Support staff during the process of Serious Incidents.

Take responsibility for ensuring that learning from DATIX incident reports, SI reports, are embedded in practice and service delivery. To undertake audit and service reviews that evidence that change has taken place and that it has reduced or managed the risk appropriately.

Service Directors are responsible for ensuring this policy is enacted throughout their teams.

On call Directors who are on call may receive SI alert calls from Managers on call

• The Director will need to confirm with the Manager that the safety and well being of the staff and patients is being managed appropriately.

• The Director will need to ensure that there is an immediate plan to ensure that any immediate learning is shared across the organisation.

• Consideration should be given to informing the Chief Executive, the Strategic Health Authority, Commissioners and the Local Authority and any other Stakeholders.

• Keep a written record of actions

• Share the immediate learning and report with the Service Directors as soon as is practicable.

Page 46: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

40

Appendix E

Trust Wide SI & Mortality Panel (Updated 23.05.16)

Terms of Reference The Trust reports the deaths of all service users on Datix. A Learning Review will take place for the vast majority, however, there may be cases where the Trust believe the death/reported Level 4/5 incident does not constitute a KMPT SI. Purpose of the panel:

• To provide oversight of all deaths occurring amongst all service users

• To make Trust decisions regarding which deaths/reported Level 4/5 incidents do not constitute a KMPT SI

• To improve the transparency of reporting levels of unexpected deaths in across all service user groups supported by the Trust

• To review service line allocation for complex cases that cross service lines/other organisation

• To highlight overdue SI Management Investigations (i.e. not completed on Datix)

• To highlight overdue responses overdue to CCG/NHSE queries

• To review ‘near miss’ incidents, ‘themed learning reviews’ & any other incidents in order to consider if they meet the Trust SI criteria

Responsibilities/duties:

1. To review all cases presented by service line leads where the completion of the initial investigation (72 hour SI Managers Report) highlights they do not meet SI criteria.

2. To review all inpatient deaths where the death was to be expected

3. To use the Trust agreed classification to identify the potential need for review or investigation in each case

4. To agree action to be taken for each case with clear rationale:

a. Case closure b. Case downgrading c. Case rejecting (e.g. natural death) d. Completion of Concise Learning Review e. Completion of Comprehensive Learning Review f. Completion of Thematic Learning Review g. Case on hold awaiting cause of death h. Request for another organisation to complete Learning Review i. Request for joint Learning Review (Lead Organisation to be recommended)

5. To develop and update a mortality dashboard which is provided to stakeholders and

reported in the annual report, that provides a full picture of all deaths, themes, CIRs and serious incidents

6. To monitor causes of deaths amongst its service users by using the 2013/14 MHMDS

data release to see if the ICD 10 chapters show any trend

Page 47: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

41

7. To provide an evidence base to share with Local Authority commissioners and other providers highlighting themes that are arising relating to social care and other agencies issues

8. To ensure that liaison with acute provider colleagues can take place at a clinical and

managerial level where the Trust has concerns raised with it about care in acute settings Core Membership Trust Wide Patient Safety Manager Complaint/SI Facilitator Service Line SI Lead (rotated) Senior Psychiatrist (rotated) Lead Nurse (rotated) Trust Director (rotated) Ad Hoc Membership SI Lead or their nominated rep to attend the panel when presenting a case to be discussed or when requested by the panel Meeting arrangements The meeting will be held weekly. Video/telephone conference facilities should be made available, as required. Admin support will be provided to the meeting & the chair The meeting chair will be the Patient Safety Manager or their nominated representative

Quorum 4 clinical staff Clinical Governance Structure The panel will be overseen & monitored by the Trust wide Patient Safety & Mortality Group (Part I) A brief overview report will be prepared by the Chair and sent to the Trust EMT (Presented by the Medical Director) Reporting and Monitoring Minutes will be taken at each meeting identifying action points. A brief overview report will be sent to Trust EMT Review of Terms of Reference: Annually by the Trust wide patient Safety & Mortality Group (Part I)

Page 48: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

42

Flow Chart for reviewing suspected natural causes deaths.

All patient deaths are reported on the

Datix System as a level 5 incident by

the member of staff who is first aware

of the death

The patient’s death is reviewed by the

patient safety team

The patient’s death is thought to be

unnatural, suspected suicide or an

unexpected sudden death

Service line or across service line

RCA to be conducted

The patients death is suspected to be

from natural causes.

The patients death is reviewed by the

weekly mortality Review and the death

is not suspected of being from natural

causes of there are care concerns

The patients death is confirmed as

natural causes and there are no care

or service delivery problems

Decision is recorded on Datix and the

incident is “allocated for investigation

RCA when completed is reviewed by

the service line’s Governance

Structures and Trust Wide Patient

Safety

Decision is recorded on Datix and the

incident is “rejected” on Datix

The action plan is monitored by the

relevant service line

The completed RCA is sent to the

relevant CCG closure panel within 60

working days

Page 49: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

43

APPENDIX F REPORTING TO EXTERNAL STAKEHOLDERS

Reporting Incident Type Timescale Reported By

NHS England

Commissioners

Clinical Commissioning Groups

Local Authorities

Suicide of any person on NHS premises or under the care of a specialist team in the community

Homicide committed by a patient with mental health problems

Serious injury or unexpected death involving a member of staff, visitor, contractor or another person to whom the organisation owes a duty of care

Serious damage to NHS property, particularly resulting in injury or disruption of services e.g. through fire, flood or criminal activity.

Incidents associated with infection that produce, of have the potential to produce, unwanted effects involving the safety of patients, staff or others

Any other Serious incidents that may be identified as a cluster of events that lead to something more significant including those that may attract media attention

Immediately within working hours or within the first hour of the next working day.

Patient Safety Manager

Coroner Death from industrial diseases

Cot death and postnatal deaths

Self harm

Where death may be linked to an accident (whenever it occurred)

Death after operation or before full recovery from anaesthetic

Death due to abortion

Cause of death unknown or within 24 hours of admission

Possibility of complaint about any medical care (negligence)

Neglect or self neglect

Any violent, suspicious or unnatural death

Drug related deaths

Death of anyone currently or recently detained in Police/Prison Custody

Immediate Ward Manager or nominated other

Service Manager

The Trusts Legal Team

Health & Safety Executive(HSE)

Death

Major injury, dangerous occurrences and ”over three day” injuries.

Immediate by telephone to the Health & Safety Executive. For further information go to H&S page on Staffzone

http://staffzone.kmpt.nhs.uk/Health-and-Safety-File.htm

Within 10 days of incident via RIDDOR link on Health & Safety Home page.

Within 10 days from diagnosis via

Ward Manager

Line Manager

Service Manager

Trust Risk Manager

Page 50: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

44

Occupational diseases RIDDOR link.

National Health Service Litigation Authority

(NHSLA)

Incidents where the Trust becomes aware that litigation will result

Immediate

Legal Services Team

Professional Regulatory bodies

Incidents where there appears to have been a breech of the professional code of conduct

As soon as the breech becomes apparent

Human Resources and Service Line Directors

Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency (MHRA)

Incidents involving injury or risk of serious injury involving healthcare products and equipment

Within 24 hours Ward Managers

Service Managers

Line Managers

Pharmacy Staff

Health & Safety Manager

Medical Devices Manager

Safeguarding Children Board

Any incident involving serious harm to a child

Immediate Safeguarding Lead

Safeguarding Vulnerable Adults Board

Any serious incident involving a vulnerable adult

Immediate Safeguarding Lead

Care Quality Commission

See Care Quality Commission Notification Procedure

As soon as possible Executive Medical Director on behalf of the Chief Executive with the Service Line Director

Environmental Health/Food Standards Agency/Health Protection Agency

Incident involving contaminated food products resulting in illness

Immediate Director of Facilities

Health & Safety Manager

Counter Fraud and Security Management Service (CFSMS)

All physical assaults against NHS staff and professionals

Immediate Via Incident Forms Direct contact from staff

Local Community Any incident that is likely to impact on the local community

As soon as possible Head of Communications

Chief Executive or nominated other

Page 51: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

45

APPENDIX G Serious Incident Reporting (Level 4 & 5).

IMMEDIATELY inform manager/ shift lead/service manager/on call manager

� Assesses medical needs of people involved

� BEFORE END OF DAY Qualified staff member completes

SI ALERT FORM (online Datix) • Inform the service user / relatives – Tell them an investigation will be

taking place & investigator will contact them– confirm in writing (As per Duty of Candour)

• Review risk assessment/care plan/observation levels/leave etc

• Consider adult/child protection alert and/or police involvement • Urgent learning shared

Takes URGENT action as relevant

* Where staff member injured or traumatized, manager considers referral to Occupational Health * Informs Ministry of Justice (Forensic services) * SI Dept communicates with other external agencies/media (e.g. CQC)

WITHIN 72 HOURS Manager (with support from Quality Team) completes SI MANAGERS REPORT (on line Datix) & DRAFTS ACTION PLAN

Where disturbed/violent behaviour – Clinical team carry out a Clinical Review meeting using NICE format (within 72 hours)

* Considers RIDDOR * Where patient/staff is potentially traumatized, Clinical Team OFFER initial support. Manager/psychology to monitor wellbeing of staff/service user and offer access to further support / counselling if signs of trauma still evident in long term

� WITHIN 10 WORKING DAYS: Clinical Team carry out a Clinical Review to highlight:

• To share and reflect upon current practice (actions before, during and after the incident)

• To highlight ways of improving practice (learning)

• To support staff & service users and encourage the therapeutic relationship between staff, service users & their carers

• To ensure best practice is followed

• To provide an opportunity to highlight issues with trust systems & trust/local policies, procedures and protocols.

WITHIN 45 WORKING DAYS Quality Team co-ordinate a LEARNING REVIEW INVESTIGATION to highlight root cause / contributory factors / learning / recommendations. Where appropriate, this includes a Learning Review meeting with the Clinical Team

� Investigators add learning points to the SI action plan for local ownership/implementation

� Learning Review approval at * Local Governance meeting * Service Line Governance meeting * Trust Patient Safety meeting

When action plan completed SI closed by Service Line Governance meeting/Chair.

Serious incidents Serious incidents involving clients, staff or property which result in grievous or substantial damage or loss, requiring further investigation overseen by a director e.g. attempted suicide or homicide with serious injuries, sudden unexpected death to natural causes, absconds of violent or suicidal clients, incidents involving property which result in financial loss or cost to the Trust of £10,000 to £40,000. Incidents involving clients, staff or property which result in death or severe service disruption e.g. suicide or homicide or rape, or incidents involving property which result in financial loss or cost to the Trust

Page 52: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

46

APPENDIX H SI LEAD REPORTING RESPONSIBILITIES

Action required: Commissioning CCG will monitor the case and report to NHS England, findings and recommendations and associated action plans. NHS England will monitor progress on a quarterly basis with CCG unless earlier discussion is required or the serious incident is re-graded. Comprehensive Investigation Root Cause Analysis (RCA) required

Monitoring required Local monitoring

• The CCG and/or NHS England will close the incident when it is satisfied the investigation, recommendations and action plan are satisfactory, and local monitoring arrangements are in place and working efficiently.

• Publish incident details within Annual Reports.

Timescales: Up to 45 working days/9 weeks from the date the incident is notified to the CCG/NHS England.

Examples:

• Mental Health – deaths in the community*

• Avoidable/unexplained death

• Mental health – attempted suicides as inpatients*

• Data loss and information security

• Grade 3 pressure ulcer develops

• Poor discharge planning causes harm to patient

Action required: Case will be monitored by the CCG in conjunction with the provider organisation. NHS England will review findings, recommendations and associated action plans. For Never Events’ the commissioning CCG will be obliged to monitor overall numbers and report these in its annual reporting arrangements. Comprehensive Investigation (RCA (as above) or Independent Investigation (RCA Investigation)*

Monitoring required CCG/NHS England. monitoring:

• Incidents leading to an independent investigation or inquiry or those considered high risk will continue to be monitored by the CCG/NHS England. or Local Authority until evidence is provided that each action plan has been implemented. Incidents involving adult or child abuse are referred to local safeguarding arrangements.

• Publish quarterly reports. Timescales: For Independent Investigations allow up to 26 weeks/6 months for completion of investigation. Extensions can be granted on an individual case-by-case basis by the CCG/NHS England..

Examples:

• Maternal Deaths

• Inpatient suicides (including following absconsion)*

• Child protection

• Data loss and information security

• Never Events

• Accusation of physical misconduct or harm is made

• Homicides following recent contact with mental health services*

*Mental health incidents should refer to DH guidance: Independent investigation of adverse events in mental health services.

Page 53: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

47

APPENDIX I CLASSIFICATION OF INCIDENTS/ACCIDENTS FOR REPORTING INCIDENTS TO NRSL VIA DATIX Nature or Type of Incident

Level 1 (near miss) NON-SERIOUS INCIDENT

Level 2 (minor risk) NON-SERIOUS INCIDENT

Level 3 (moderate risk) NON-SERIOUS INCIDENT

Level 4 (major risk) SERIOUS INCIDENT

Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe) SERIOUS INCIDENT

Definitions Incidents resulting in no injury or damage but potentially could have caused injury/damage/loss. Normally dealt with/investigated by the ward manager/Service Managers/front line staff.

Incidents resulting in Very minor injury, Damage or loss. Normally dealt with/investigated by the ward manager/Service Managers/frontline staff

Incidents resulting In moderately serious injury , damage or loss requiring formal investigation by the Ward Manager/Service Manager.

Incidents resulting in grievous harm/potentially life threatening to a person a substantial damage or loss requiring a formal investigation by the Service Manager in consultation with the Assistant Service Director.

Reportable to the NHS England, Commissioners and KCC Major incidents resulting in life threatening events extremely serious harm or death, substantial damage or loss requiring a formal investigation by the Assistant Service Director. These incidents may necessitate an inquiry panel.

Absconsion and absent without leave (AWOL) Including Depravation of Liberty Patients

Threats to abscond - with no intent. And attempted absconding Informal client fails to return and not at risk.

Absconds within the grounds/ward/department and returns soon after. Informal client with potential risk leaves the ward. Informal patient fails to return from leave.

Absconds but not deemed violent/suicidal/vulnerable. Detained patient fails to return from leave Informal patient fails to return from leave, but is not deemed vulnerable, violent or suicidal.

Absconds and deemed to be violent/suicidal/vulnerable. Detained client under restriction order fails to return and is deemed violent/suicidal. Detained client fails to return and is deemed violent/suicidal/vulnerable

Absconsion leading to suicide/homicide, serious harm to others or damage to property. AWOL leading to suicide/homicide, serious harm to others or damage property. Restricted patients escape from within the perimeter of a medium secure unit.

Accidents, including needle stick injury Incidents are graded by the level of actual injury / damage sustained rather than by the potential for an

injury / damage to occur.

Any accidents with no injury/minimal loss.

Minor burns/scalding or minor unaccounted for injuries. Accidents resulting in minor injury requiring first aid within the service.

Minor injuries requiring medical attention. “Over 3-day injury” RIDDOR reportable. Needle stick injury with no infection. An event which moderately impacts adversely on a large number of patients or staff

Injuries requiring medical attention in A & E, or hospitalisation. Needle stick injury from infected person Accident resulting in injury that requires medical attention eg. Accident and Emergency referral/an inpatient stay in a an acute hospital and or any fracture. Mismanagement of patient care with long term effects

Causing death/life -threatening Injuries. Causing life threatening disease or death.

Page 54: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

48

Nature or Type of Incident

Level 1 (near miss) Level 2 (minor risk) Level 3 (moderate risk) Level 4 (major risk) Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe)

Adult Protection Policy – failure to comply with policy

No action in respect of Adult Protection Policy but this was identified through supervision and a near miss must be recorded. Failure to share information that a vulnerable adult may be at risk from harm or abuse.

No action taken in respect of the Adult Protection policy and a minor incident occurred with no injury. Delay in implementing safeguarding procedures resulting in a failure to provide protection.

No action taken in respect of the Adult Protection Policy and an incident occurred causing Injury or harm requiring A & E assessment. Minor harm to vulnerable adult following a failure to share information or implement safeguarding procedures.

No action in respect of the Adult Protection Policy and an incident occurred causing serious injury and requiring A&E assessment and admission to an acute bed Significant harm to vulnerable adult following a failure to share information or implement safeguarding procedures

No alert in respect of the Adult Protection Policy and an incident occurred and contributed to the death of a Service User or member of the public. Serious adult abuse and or neglect which may or may not cause death of a client.

Aggression: verbal (including racial harassment) Where aggression is staff to patient or staff to staff please consult the Patient Safety Team for grading.

Physical aggression and management

Sexual

(including harassment) Assault by staff on patient; Assault by staff on staff; Allegations of abuse Injuries sustained during restraint

Verbal assault to harm others but no intent – non- directed. Pushing/shoving, pinching, slapping, punching and threats, but no injuries. Chart to now include all types of abuse including sexual, racist or homophobic abuse, financial etc. Control and Restraint undertaken with no injury incurred. Occasional sexual/amorous remarks. Inappropriate behaviour with no intent. Take advice and discuss

With Service Manager/Director prior to deciding the level of severity

Verbal assault including persistent sexist/racist/homophobic remarks – directed at person. Pushing/shoving, pinching, slapping, punching causing minor injury. Biting (skin intact). No implements used. Possession of banned Items. Control and Restraint undertaken with minor injury to staff or patient treated by first aid. Persistent sexual remarks or inappropriate sexual behaviour, innuendoes/homophobic

language. Take advice and discuss with Service

Manager/Director prior to deciding the level of severity.

Verbal assault, racially motivated abuse, threat to kill or maim - directed at person/ property with intent. Threat of assault based on equality characteristics – e.g. race, sexual orientation, transgender, disability etc. Assault by client/staff using implements causing minor injury requiring first aid on ward/department.

Physical aggression resulting in restraint, minor injury requiring medical attention. Possession of a weapon. Control and Restraint with injury requiring medical care or A & E admission. Allegations of sexual assault. Threat of sexual assault. Sexual harassment with physical contact. Sexual exposure. Form of words for stalking to be included… Take advice and discuss with Service

Manager/Director prior to deciding the level of severity.

Verbal assault, racially motivated abuse, threat to kill or maim with real intent – or history of physical aggression. Attacks resulting in

serious injuries

requiring A & E

treatment/hospitalisation, attempted homicide

Attempted homicide. Use of weapon/implement resulting in injury to staff or patient Persistent serious harassment with contact based on equality Characteristics Assault motivated by discriminatory attitudes – e.g. Racist, homophobic Control and Restraint undertaken with significant injury resulting in admission to A & E and/or admission to the Acute Hospitals Trust. Actual minor sexual assault/persistent serious harassment, physical contact with intention to molest. Serious sexual assault. Persistent serious harassment with contact but no intent to molest. Take advice and discuss with Service

Manager/Director prior to deciding the level of severity.

Verbal assault, racially motivated, abuse threat to kill or maim with intent and with outside involvement. Staff and/or patient feel victimised or are placed in serious/immediate danger. Homicide / Manslaughter. Assault of pregnant woman causing physical damage or harm to the child or woman Assault of a person with a disability with serious consequences -e.g. loss of mobility. Assault resulting in serious harm where discriminatory attitudes are clearly identified as the cause. Control and Restraint undertaken resulting in serious injury requiring emergency treatment and/or causes death. Rape/ very serious sexual assault. Take advice and discuss with Service

Manager/Director prior to deciding the level of severity.

Page 55: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

49

Nature or Type of Incident

Level 1 (near miss) Level 2 (minor risk) Level 3 (moderate risk) Level 4 (major risk) Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe)

Child Protection Policy - failure to comply with policy (also refer to Safeguarding below)

No action in respect of Child Protection but this was identified through supervision and a near miss must be recorded.

No action taken in respect of the Child Protection policy and a minor incident occurred with no injury to child/children.

No action taken in respect of the Child Protection Policy and an incident occurred causing minor injury or harm to a child/children.

No action in respect of the Child Protection Policy and an incident Occurred causing serious injury to a child/children.

No Alert in respect of the Child Protection Policy and an incident occurred and caused the death of child/children.

Clostridium diff

Patient admitted with C. diff and in consequence Infection control procedures activated.

Patient admitted and later identified as having C diff requiring Infection Control procedure activated.

Patient identified through routine physical health management as having C.diff and Infection Control procedures are activated.

Patient identified with C.diff requires urgent A & E and inpatient care in the Acute Hospitals Trust.

Patient identified as C.diff and dies within the care of the Trust.

Death N/A Expected death from natural causes on an inpatient unit. Unexpected death from natural causes in the community.

Unexpected death from natural causes within an inpatient unit.

Suicide in the community of client known to services within 6 months of the incident. Death related to illicit drug /alcohol misuse of a current Service User.

Suspected Suicide of an in-patient or suicide on Trust Premises. Suspected Suicide of client discharged within 14 days from inpatient services.

Discharge - patient discharge: early or self discharge

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity. As above.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity. As above.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity. As above.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity. As above.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity. As above.

Discrimination on the basis of protected characteristics under the Equality Act (2010):* Ethnicity / race / gender / Transgender / civil partnership / marriage / Religion / sexual orientation / age / Disability / Pregnancy/maternity Links to Equality Act are clearer, when listed in this way within the policy.

Derogatory comments or behaviour (including the use of unacceptable/ abusive words) based on equality characteristics. Racist or other discriminatory insignia or images. Pornography where this may impact on others (excluding private use).

Persistent inappropriate sexual behaviour Persistent Sexual racist, homophobic or discriminatory comments and/or behaviour. Abuse based on equality characteristics (e.g. racist) directed at person/s. Verbal abuse where discriminatory attitudes are strongly suspected as the cause.

Threat of sexual assault. Threat of assault based on equality characteristics – e.g. race, sexual orientation, transgender, disability etc. Sexual harassment with physical contact. Sexual exposure.

Assault motivated by discriminatory attitudes – e.g. racist, homophobic. Serious sexual assault. Persistent serious harassment with contact based on Equality characteristics.

Assault of pregnant woman causing physical damage or harm to the child or woman. Assault of a person with a disability with serious consequences -e.g. loss of mobility. Assault resulting in serious harm where discriminatory attitudes are clearly identified as the cause.

Page 56: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

50

Nature or Type of Incident

Level 1 (near miss) Level 2 (minor risk) Level 3 (moderate risk) Level 4 (major risk) Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe)

Falls Slipping, falling with no injuries.

Slipping, falling with minor injury requiring on site first aid only.

Slipping, falling, sprains requiring medical attention; i.e. accident and emergency referral.

Falls, slipping causing dislocations/fractures requiring medical attention in A & E/ hospitalisation.

Causing death. Please risk assess to confirm whether Level 4 or Level 5 incident.

Fire Setting off fire alarms accidental or deliberate, with little or no disruption.

No injury or damage. Setting off fire alarms accidental or deliberate resulting in evacuation and attendance of fire brigade Threat of arson

Minor injury and/or damage.

Significant damage to property/ person. or significant injury

Substantial damage to property/person e.g. major disruption to service. Fire causing death / life threatening injuries to staff and or patients.

Health and Safety Reported defect to the interior/exterior part or parts of the building not resulting in the disruption to service. Release (spillage/gas discharge) of the substance non hazardous to health.

Accidental release of any substance which may cause ill health. Short term disruption to the service caused by the damage of the exterior/interior part of the building.

Accidental release of any substance which will cause ill health. Any unintentional explosion, misfire, failure of demolition to cause the intended collapse, projection of material beyond a site boundary, injury caused by an explosion;

Explosion or fire causing suspension of normal work for over 24 hours. Health and Safety Incident resulting in patient or staff injury requiring hospitalisation. Accidental release of a biological agent likely to cause severe human illness.

Health and Safety incident resulting in a death of patient or staff.

Human Resources/staffing Short term low staffing level that temporarily reduces service quality < 1day.

Low staffing level that reduces the service quality.

Unsafe staffing level > 1 day. Staff whose professional registration expired continues to practice without prior renewing their license (no lapse at all after 01.11.2015 when it can result in suspension).

Unsafe staffing level > 5 days. No staff attending mandatory training on an ongoing basis. Unregistered staff or staff struck of from the register continues to practise.

Unsafe staffing level for service to operate.

Inappropriate behaviour e.g. consenting to sex

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity.

Discuss with team and, if necessary take advice prior to deciding the level of severity.

Infection Control and Ill Health

Exposure to blood/body fluids/other sources of infection with no risk and no effects.

Exposure to blood/body fluid or other source of infection with minimal risk/no sickness. Infection Control procedures activated and managed internally by the Trust. Patient in an inpatient setting diagnosed with a communicable disease (chicken pox. Measles, TB)

Exposure to blood/body fluid or other source of infection resulting in short-term sickness (minimum 3 days).

Exposure to blood/ body fluid or other source of infection resulting in Serious infection, long term sick leave Infection Control procedures activated with more than one patient affected by the outbreak. The Health Protection Agency contacted Needlestick injury/ human bite that breaks skin Any outbreak of infection (D&V MRSA) Any diagnosis of bacteraemia MRSA, MSSA, E Coli) in a patient. Infection Control Procedures activated with a ward or site closed due to an outbreak of infection. The Health Protection Agency visit and support the Trust Needle stick injury from a patient with a known blood borne virus (HIV, Hep B, Hep C). MRSA, Bacteraemia and C-Diff with infection

Sudden or unexpected death where evidence may be related to exposure to infection. Any Incident involving serious outbreak of infectious diseases in hospital or the community (such as food poisoning) Patient identified as MRSA who dies within the Trust. Infection Control Procedures are activated and patients die as a direct result of the infection. The Health Protection Agency are actively involved in managing the outbreak. Needle stick injury causing recipient to contact a serious illness (HIV, Hep B).

Page 57: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

51

Nature or Type of Incident

Level 1 (near miss) Level 2 (minor risk) Level 3 (moderate risk) Level 4 (major risk) Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe)

Information Technology and Communication Management

Use IT HELP Desk for Information Technology to determine the Level. Interruption of the IT system (failure of logging into the system) not affecting individual’s workload to a great extent.

Use IT HELP Desk for Information Technology to determine the Level. Interruption of the IT system (failure of logging into the system) affecting individual ability to perform his tasks efficiently.

Unauthorised use of Information Technology for non NHS Business. Loss of access to PIMS/Web based CPA single site. Loss of Network Services to a single Site. Theft of P.C/Laptop. CATT Team loss of access - one day. Accidental damage to I.T, equipment. Disruption of the IT system (server failure) affecting service provision > 1 day.

Using IT in breach of Trust Policies, i.e. accessing inappropriate web sites. Loss of PIMS/Web CPA to multiple sites. Loss of Network Services to multiple Sites. Theft of P.C/Lap top containing patient information. Deliberate damage to single P.C/Printer/Lap Top.

Using IT resources in breach of legislation. Computer misuse, data protection, human rights etc. Loss of information to PIMS/Web CPA service that prevents access to patient information and causes a negative patient outcome. Loss of Trust Network to multiple sites that prevents clinical staff gaining access to patient information and causes a negative patient outcome. The loss or theft of a lap top where reasonable security has not been undertaken resulting in a breech of confidentiality or data protection and having an adverse outcome on the patient. Theft of multi-PC's containing patient information. Deliberate damage to multiple PC's/printers/lap tops.

Loss/theft of personal/Trust property.

Very low cost or loss to the Trust.

Cost or loss to Trust up to £500. Personal loss/cost to client, staff, public <£100.

Cost or loss to Trust £500 - £10,000. Personal cost/loss to client, staff, public £100 - £5,000.

Cost or loss to Trust £10,000 - £40,000. Personal cost to client, staff, public £5,000 - £10,000.

Cost or loss to Trust of more than £40,000 + Personal loss to client, staff, public or more than £10,000 +.

Medication errors (Wrong dosage)

Incorrect medicine dispensed, but not ingested.

Error in administration of medication with no adverse effects. Delayed and / or omitted (including omissions due to alcohol and / or drug misuse) medication where there are no adverse affects.

Potential effect on client due to incorrect dosage. Delayed and / or omitted (including omissions due to alcohol and / or drug misuse) medication where there are no adverse affects.

Effect on client due to incorrect dosage. Any medication incident causing significant affects Prolonged delayed and omitted medication where there is an adverse affect on the patient.

Leading to serious harm or causing death.

Medication errors (Wrong drug)

The wrong medication, dispensed but not given.

The wrong medication given but with no adverse effects. Prescription is unclear or incorrect but seen and corrected before administration. Delayed and / or omitted (including omissions due to alcohol and / or drug misuse) medication where there are no adverse affects.

The wrong medication given with some minor effects but not serious Prescription is unclear or incorrect and medication is administered with some minor effects. Delayed and / or omitted (including omissions due to alcohol and / or drug misuse) medication where there are no adverse affects.

The wrong medication given requiring A & E intervention. Prescription is unclear or incorrect and medication is administered with adverse effects requiring A & E Intervention. Any medication incident causing significant affects Prolonged delayed and omitted medication where there is an adverse affect on the patient.

The wrong medication contributing to or causing death or serious harm. Prescription is unclear and incorrect medication is given with contributing to or causing death.

MRSA Patient admitted with known MRSA infection with infection control procedures activated.

Patient admitted and later identified as having MRSA requiring Infection Control procedure activated. Patient identified through routine physical health management as having MRSA and requiring Infection Control procedures activated. Patient identified with MRSA requires urgent A&E and Inpatient care in the Acute Hospitals Trust.

Patient identified as MRSA who dies within the Trust.

Page 58: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

52

Page 59: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

53

Nature or Type of Incident

Level 1 (near miss) Level 2 (minor risk) Level 3 (moderate risk) Level 4 (major risk) Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe)

Physical Health (including seizures, physical illness and pressure ulcer) include refusing appointment Self neglect

Client presents with unexplained minor injury, e.g. bruising

Client presents with physical illness requiring treatment on site. Pressure ulcer graded level 2 or below, suspected initial presentation of pressure ulcer

Client in inpatient setting presents with physical illness requiring referral to A and E and / or ambulance

Patients who have a cardiac arrest Pressure ulcers resulting in a severe wound (where the pressure ulcer develops within our services)

Possession of offensive weapon

Offensive weapon given to client by third party. Client informs staff of possession.

Offensive weapon found on or with client or visitor.

Attempted use of a weapon or actual use of an offensive weapon.

Property damage

Defacing property of walls, minimal cost to the Trust.

Cost or loss to Trust up to 500. Personal loss/cost to client, staff, public up to £100.

Cost to Trust £500 - £5,000.

Cost to Trust £5,000 - £40,000.

Cost to Trust of more than £40,000 + .Service suspended or major disruption.

Records availability

Records not available when required but location known.

Records unavailable, location not known but not "lost".

Can't be tracked in 40 days.

Records lost/unavailable for inquiry.

Records destroyed/lost. Adverse patient reaction.

Records Confidentiality. Data Protection

Records not properly secured but no obvious disclosure. Patient information visible in reception areas (P.C. Screen)

Patient identifiable, information shared Inappropriately. Unauthorised sharing of passwords.

Unauthorised disclosure of patient information with no patient harm. Deliberate use of another staff member’s password.

Information disclosed to unauthorised source - possibility of patient harm.

Information disclosed to unauthorised source and Information Commissioner investigation causing actual patient harm

Records content

Short delay in updating record. Not impacting on case.

Delay in updating record-minimum impact on case or records standards not used (e.g. blue pen, entries not timed).

Record incomplete and other parts of the Record cannot be traced. Paper record conflicts with electronic record.

Alerts details and/or drug missing. Advance Directive is missing.

Deliberate tampering with record content.

Safeguarding Children and young people (includes unborn baby through to 18th birthday)

Failure to share information appropriately that a child may be at risk from harm, or a child being at risk of harm either whilst on Trust premises or from an individual under the direct care of the Trust, without resultant harm being suffered by a child. Visit by a child to Service User terminated Admission of a child aged 17 to a bed not specifically single sex and set aside, or without support from CAHMS staff.

Delay in implementing safeguarding children procedures resulting in failure to provide protection/intervention at an early stage. Child placed at risk during a visit to a Service User. Child in contact with person who is a risk to children whilst under Trust’s care/on Trust premises.

Minor harm to a child. Either following failure to share information to protect the child, or occurring whilst the child or perpetrator was under the direct care of the Trust.

Significant harm to a child. Either following failure to share information to protect the child, or occurring whilst the child or perpetrator was under the direct care of the Trust. Allegations made against staff of behaviour that has harmed, or may have harmed a child. Admission of a child aged 16 or under to an adult ward.

Security incidents Premises or individual areas found unlocked with no public access. Defacing property to walls with minimum cost to the Trust. Trust staff entering secure sites with no visible ID.

Premises or individual areas found unlocked with public access. Defacing property or walls with a cost to the Trust of up to £500. Personal cost /loss to staff of up to £100.

Trespassing on the grounds of secure units. Defacing property or walls with a cost to the Trust of up to £501 - £20,000. Personal cost /loss to staff of over £101.

Break in / robbery of community / inpatient services with staff present.

Cost to Trust of more than £20,000 and security incident resulting in suspension or major disruption of services.

Page 60: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

54

Nature or Type of Incident

Level 1 (near miss) Level 2 (minor risk) Level 3 (moderate risk) Level 4 (major risk) Level 5 (high risk/catastrophe)

Self harm

Threats to self harm indicating attention seeking behaviour. Attempted self harm with no injury

Self harm with minor injuries. requiring first aid and or medical attention on site

Minor self-harm requiring medical attention on ward/ in A & E.

Attempted suicide/homicide with serious injuries. Self harm resulting in serious injuries. Attempted suicide or actual suicide injuries

Suicide - in patient or known to service in last 12 months. Self harm resulting in death

Substance Use / Substance Abuse (alcohol & drug)

Suspected possession of alcohol or illicit drugs but no evidence. Failure to provide urine sample on request – Forensic services only Suspicion of illicit drug use in inpatient services

Evidence of alcohol possession or consumption but not intoxicated. Use of alcohol and / or illicit drugs where client not intoxicated Discovery of alcohol and or illicit drugs in inpatient services

Evidence of alcohol and/or illicit drug consumption and intoxicated behaviour posing risk to self/others. Possession of a small quantity of illicit drugs. Client in possession of drugs or alcohol. Suspicion of patient with intent to supply illicit drugs and / or alcohol within in patient services.

Evidence of alcohol and/or illicit drug abuse/consumption and intoxicated behaviour causing risk to self/others. Possession of a large amount of illicit drugs/supplying others with illicit drugs. Overdose of illicit drugs requiring medical intervention.

Death or life threatening situation resulting from use of alcohol or illicit drugs.

Trust Policies and Procedures: failure to comply with

Incident averted because of the vigilance of staff however this must be registered as a near miss.

Incident occurs causing minor harm to a member of staff, Service User or member of the public.

Puts staff/Service Users or members of the public at risk requiring A & E assessment.

Puts staff/Service Users or members of the public at risk requiring A & E assessment and admission to the Acute Services Trust.

Death of a member of staff, Service User or member of the public.

Unaccounted for loss or injury

Anything not covered above involving property or persons either very low loss or no injury.

Anything not covered above involving property or persons either low cost or requiring just verbal support.

Anything not covered above involving property or persons either moderate loss or requiring first aid and counselling only.

Anything not covered above involving property or persons requiring first aid, counselling and medical attention in A & E /hospitalisation.

Sudden or unexpected death not covered above involving property or persons.

Use / Misuse of clinical information

Failure to share information with other agencies or vice versa.

Loss of all or part of a clinical record. Accidental deletion of electronic record. Letters / reports incorrectly addressed.

Unauthorised access to a clinical record. Loss or stolen record outside of Trust premises. Wilful destruction of records. Written or verbal breach of confidentiality.

Breach of information security impacting on service delivery requiring full investigation. Damage to a services reputation. Low key local media coverage. Serious breach of confidentiality e.g. up to 100 people affected.

Major breach of information having Trust wide impact on service delivery and or the reputation of the Trust. Serious breach with either particular sensitivity e.g. sexual health details, 1000 or over people affected.

Page 61: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

55

APPENDIX J SERIOUS INCIDENT QUALITY ASSURANCE CHECKLIST

LR Initials

DoB Initials of Reviewers

Date of Meeting

No Element Assured

Comments

Y/N Y/N 1. Was one of the national standard NHS

investigation Learning Review tool used?

2. Was there more than one Learning Review investigator in the core team?

3. Was one of the LR investigators a Clinician? 4. Was there a robust pre and post Learning

Review risk assessment?

5. Were the terms of reference clear and relevant to the incident?

6. Was the methodology used appropriate to the incident? (e.g. patients notes/statements)

7. Did the methodology include face to face interviews of relevant people (individual or group)? (Includes Clinical Team Learning Review Meeting)

8. Is there evidence that those affected (Including service users/staff/relatives /victims/ perpetrators) were involved and supported appropriately?

9. Is there evidence that those with an interest were involved – see above point ?

10. Have notable practices been clearly highlighted?

11. Are good practice guidance/policy/protocols referenced in the Learning Review to determine what should have happened?

12. Are care and service delivery problems clearly identified? (this must include what happened that shouldn’t have /what didn’t happen that should have)

13. Is it clear that contributory factors have been explored/highlighted?

14. Is it clear that root causes/issues have been considered?

15. Have robust points of learning been highlighted?

16. Are there clear recommendations to support the gaps/problems/learning highlighted?

17. Was a timeline/chronology included in the Learning Review?

18. Is there a clear action plan related to the learning/recommendations?

19. Is it clear that individuals have not been unfairly blamed?

20. Comments:

Page 62: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

56

APPENDIX K HOW TO IDENTIFY A REPORTABLE INCIDENT FLOWCHART

START HERE Did the incident involve

personal injury to someone?

Was the person injured staff, service user /

visitor or contractor?

Yes

Refer to the ‘RIDDOR Dangerous Occurrences

flowchart 2’, before taking any further action

No

Contractor

Record the incident on Datix form but as a

non reportable incident,

and ensure that the

contractor’s employer is

made aware of

the incident.

Service user / visitor

Were they transferred to hospital or would have been if they were not already admitted to a hospital for treatment

Was it an illness or

injury caused by

Natural Causes?

Was the incident

caused by something The Trust did or did not do i.e. dry a wet

floor, leave something on the floor

etc

Record the incident on Datix form and then

complete and send the

online RIDDOR report at

www.riddor.gov.uk (note

must be completed within 10 days of

incident).

Record the incident on

Datix.

Staff NOTE: Absence as a result of stress, anxiety or depression is currently NOT reportable under RIDDOR. NOTE: If a disease is suspected of being an occupational disease contact the occupational health department for conformation before reporting under RIDDOR

Was the member of

staff working at the time of the incident?

Treat as service user / visitor

accident

Was it an illness or

injury caused by Natural Causes?

Record the incident on Datix form as Natural

Causes

Refer to the ‘RIDDOR Major Injury

Flowchart 3’ before taking any further action. If it was a

Major injury follow the instructions on

Flowchart 3. If it was not a Major injury, continue below.

Is the staff member unable to work for more than 3

consecutive days? (excluding the day of the accident but including any off-duty / non

rostered days)

Record the incident on Datix form and complete the RIDDOR report

on-line at www.riddor.gov.uk (note – must be within 10 days of the

incident) If classified as Levels 4 or 5 implement SUI procedure.

Record the incident on

Datix

No

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

No

Yes

No

No

Yes

Yes

How to identify a Reportable Incident - Flowchart 1

Yes

Page 63: Management and Investigation of Serious Incidents … 1 INTRODUCTION 1.1 It is recognised that things sometimes go wrong and that serious incidents, incidents, accidents and near misses

57

APPENDIX L HOW TO INVESTIGATE NON SERIOUS INCIDENT See Separate Chart for serious incident Level 1: Incidents involving Clients, Staff or property which result in no injury, damage or loss but with the potential to cause injury loss or damage e.g. verbal aggression without intent to harm, accidents with no injury, minimal damage or loss to property Level 2: Incidents involving clients, staff or property which result in minor injury, damage or loss, but no serious consequences e.g. self-harm or assault causing minor injury, or financial loss or cost to the Trust of up to £500 Level 3: Incidents involving clients, staff or property which result in moderately serious injury, damage or loss requiring formal investigation by a senior manager e.g. needlestick injury, allegation of sexual assault – allegation of sexual assault should be an SI, attacks needing medical attention in the ward or department, or financial cost to the Trust of £500 - £10,000

Inform person in charge

Incident or near miss occurs, complete relevant

paper work and follow reporting process

If member of staff involved in incident is injured send copy to Occupational Health within 72 hours.

Each staff member should retain a copy.

Reviews the incident, investigation and re-assesses risk rating in light of the

learning from the investigation. Completes the manager report on Datix

Ensures implementation of any service or environmental changes. Reviews all incidents, identify themes and trends and share learning at the Health & Safety meetings or if urgent share learning with Service Director who will share it across other service

lines

Service Manager � Ensures appropriate action has been

taken to manage risk � If staff incident, follow reporting process � Ensure immediate health & safety

concerns are addressed � Review Risk Assessments & Risk Register

& ensure they are updated as appropriate

IMMEDIATELY OR AS SOON AS PRACTICAL

BEFORE END OF SHIFT

WITHIN 2 WORKING DAYS

Next Health & Safety Meeting

Person in charge � Ensures the Datix alert Dif 1 form is

completed with relevant risk rating of severity

� Completes the investigation � Signs & sends form to service

manager � Ensures a full written account of the

incident is documented in the relevant records

� With client permission Informs clients & relatives

If appropriate inform RC/ Lead Clinician as soon as

is practically possible

Review client’s care plan & assess persons medical care needs. If staff member involved, refer to

Incident Policy & action as required