Upload
trinhanh
View
214
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Common issues
• Complex patients being listed for surgery based on an X-Ray review or investigation
• No shared decision making
• Failure to assess for markers of frailty
• Failure to identify, counsel or plan for predictable complications- AKI, cardiorespiratory issues, delirium
• Referral tennis
Definition of frailty
• “Decreased physiological reserve across multiple organ systems leading to increased vulnerability to seemingly minor external stressors.”
Eg UTI, URTI, minor surgery, new medication
Why is it important?
• High Frailty score predictably associated with adverse outcomes
• Frailty can be modified if recognised
CEPOD 2010 “An age old problem”
• “….comorbidity, disability and frailtyneed to be clearly recognized as independent markers of risk in the elderly. This requires skill & multidisciplinary input including early involvement of Medicine for the Elderly”.
• BGS recommends all encounters between health staff and older people should include assessment for frailty.
Have we made progress
• 2014 survey of 160 acute trusts – 12% had formal arrangements for geriatric review preop, and 20% postop
• NELA – 14% of trusts had preoperative geriatric review
frailty• may present acutely eg falls/delirium/sudden
immobility
• May not always be recognised if not actively sought
• Requires a different approach from organ-specific disease
• We may not be as familiar with how to get help or advice about frailty
BGS – recognising frailty
• Gait speed - >5 seconds to walk 4 meters
• TUGT – 10s to stand, walk 3 meters, turn and sit
• PRISMA 7 - >85• Male
• Health problems limiting activity
• Need someone to help regularly
• Health problems meaning stay at home
• Can you count on someone close to help
• Regularly use stick or walking aid to get about
Edmonton frailty scoreEDMONTON FRAILTY SCORE Score17
domain item 0 points 1 point 2 points
cognition Clock drawing No error minor other
General health Number admissions in last12/12 0 1-2 >2
Describe your health verygood fair poor
Functional independence
How many activities require help –meals, laundry, shopping, transport, phone, house keeping, money, medication.
0-1 2-4 5-8
Social support Can you count on someone to help? always sometimes never
medication >5 prescription meds no yes
Do you forget to take them at times? no yes
nutrition Have you lost weight? no yes
mood Do you often feel sad/depressed No yes
continence Do you have a problem with urine control sometimes
no yes
Functional TUGT 0-10s 11-20 >20
total
Management in the community
• No evidence that routine population screening improves health outcomes
• All frail patients should be holistically reviewed in primary care – Comprehensive Geriatric Assessment
• Treat medical conditions
• Personalised care and support plan
• Consider referral – COTE, psychiatry
• Regular medication review
Perioperative management – LOOK FOR IT
• Surgical patients – up to 40-50%
• In Community – 8.5% women, 4.1% men
• Care home residents
– 400,000 care home residents in UK
– “majority” deemed to be frail
Current pathways…
• Preop service concentrates on “single organ” referrals
• Often binary “fit or unfit” outcome
• GP/specialist physicians not always aware of research on periop risk
• Delays, sometimes exclusion from surgery
• POPS model
• Proactive referral – clear referral criteria
• Clinic MDT – interventions – geriatrician, anaesthetist, surgeon,OT, physio, SW, sec
• Hospital admission – postop COTE input, discharge planning
• Post-discharge – links with primary care, intermediate care, specialist clinic FU
POPS referral
• AGE > 65 (flexible) with one or more– Dementia/cognitive impairment
– 2 or more uncontrolled comorbidities
– Functional dependence
– > 6 prescription medications
– Multiple hospital admissions 12/12 12/12in in last 12/12
– Concerns about low BMI
– Poor exercise tolerance
Results from Bolton POPS service (2007)
pre POPS POPS
LOS(days) 7.9 4.5
Delirium 12% 1.9%
Pneumonia 16% 0%
Constipation 32% 7.7%
Urinary retention 48% 23%
Delayed d/c 46% 34%
“A multifactorial interdisciplinary intervention reduces frailty in older people” BMC medicine, 2013, 11;65 Cameron et al
• Weight loss – dietician, meal provision
• Low activity levels – physiotherapy
• Social isolation – community engagement
• Chronic disease management and regular review
• All takes time
In hospital
• Early mobilisation
• Nutritional assistance
• Orientating communication
• Regular detailed review including medication
Case study
• 83 year old lady, retired office worker
• Idiopathic Parkinson’s Disease
– Levodopa QDS, Rivastigmine patch
• Dementia syndrome
– Visual and musical hallucinations
• Severe OA both knees
• Hypertension
Background
• Hallucinations much better since rivastigminepatch started
• Increased falls with knee giving way
• Very keen for surgery to help pain and mobility
Social Background
• Lives alone in a bungalow
• Carers QDS and “Care On Call”
• Adapted shower room
• Assistance with all ADL’s
• Occasional urinary incontinence
• Mobile short distances with zimmer frame
• Friend Terry, personal carer
Medications
Losartan 25mg OD
Rivastigmine patch 9.5mg/24 hours
Co-careldopa 250mg MR QDS (8, 13, 18, 22)
Amlodipine 5mg OD
Adcal D3 BD
Paracetamol
Codeine phosphate
Assessment
• ACE-R 72/100
• EFS 13/17 (Severe frailty syndrome)
• BMI 21.6
• Bloods unremarkable
• Normal spirometry
• CT Brain- old occipital infarcts
Outcome
• Spinal anaesthesia with aim of not interfering with oral levodopa
• Proactive management of constipation
• Counselling regarding delirium risk and delirium measures
• Joint preoperative plan with Parkinson’s team
• Suspension of antihypertensives
Post-operative period
• Mild postoperative delirium
• AKI avoided
• Pain an issue initially but optimised
• Discharged home with care package
• Seen in clinic- mood much improved, mobility better
• Very pleased with outcome from surgery, wants 2nd knee doing