Upload
laith-lopez
View
43
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Managing Salt in Southern Arizona Water. By Justin Nixon, Dr. Robert Arnold and Dr. Wendell Ela. Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering University of Arizona 04/18/2009. Tucson Active Management Area. Water Supply/Demand Projections. 500. 450. 400. Incidental. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Managing Salt in Southern Arizona Water
Department of Chemical and
Environmental Engineering
University of Arizona
04/18/2009
By Justin Nixon, Dr. Robert Arnold
and Dr. Wendell Ela
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
1984 1989 1994 1999 2004 2009 2014 2019 2024Year
Su
pp
ly (
1000
s o
f A
F)
Incidental Reuse
CAP Delivery
Renewable Groundwater
Water Reuse
Total Demand
Water Supply/Demand Projections
Tucson Active Management Area
Tucson Primary Water SourcesConversion to CAP
Water Quality Constituent
Mean Well Water
CAP Water
Total Dissolved Solids (mg/L) 179 806 Hardness (mg/L CaCO3) 96 322
Sodium (mg/L) 24 102 Calcium (mg/L) 31 75
Magnesium (mg/L) 5 31 Barium (mg/L) < 0.01 0.15
Strontium (mg/L) < 0.1 1 Chloride (mg/L) 13 94 Sulfate (mg/L) 26 256
Alkalinity (mg/L HCO 3̄ ) 103 119 Total Organic Carbon (mg/L C) < 1 3.1
Salinity Impact in TAMA
275
300
325
350
1993 1997 2001 2005 2009
Year
TD
S L
ev
els
Projected TDS levels in TAMA ground waters
5-8 mg/L annual increase
Arizona (all sources) : 1.0M-1.3M tons/yrTAMA (all sources) : 140,000-233,000 tons/yrTAMA (CAP only) : 85,000-190,000 tons/yr
Research Objective: Find cost effective
ways to manage salt in inland water supplies.
Reverse Osmosis ForSalt Separation
Single RO Element
RO TreatmentSchematic
ConcentratedSalts
FEEDFLOW
H2OH2O
H2O
H2O Mg
Cl
Fe++
HCO3 Ca
SO4
++
++
H2O H2OH2O
H2O H2OH2O
Permeate
Na+ ConcentratedSalts
FEEDFLOW
H2OH2O
H2O
H2O Mg
Cl
Fe++
HCO3 Ca
SO4
++
++
H2O H2OH2O
H2O H2OH2O
H2O H2OH2O
H2O H2OH2O
Permeate
Na+
Sources of Membrane ScalingPrecipitate Ion
Concentrationlog (ion prod) log KS0 Degree of Over
Saturation
BaSO4 -8.48 -10.0 827.83
CaSO4-5.25 -4.85 9.95
CaCO3 -7.7 -8.48 150.64
[Ba+2] = 1.17 x 10-6 M
[SO4-2] = 2.81 x 10-3 M
[Ca+2] = 2.0 x 10-3 M
[CO3-2] = 1.0 x 10-5 M
Precipitate IonConcentration
log (ion prod) log KS0 Degree of OverSaturation
BaSO4 -8.48 -10.0 827.83
CaSO4-5.25 -4.85 9.95
CaCO3 -7.7 -8.48 150.64
[Ba+2] = 1.17 x 10-6 M
[SO4-2] = 2.81 x 10-3 M
[Ca+2] = 2.0 x 10-3 M
[CO3-2] = 1.0 x 10-5 M
CAP Sample Point - 713
Barium versus RO Recovery
0.00
0.02
0.04
0.06
0.08
0.10
0.12
0.14
0.16
0.18
0.20
Time
Ba+
2 Co
ncen
trati
on
(m
g/l
)
65%
70%
75%
80%
85%
90%
Barium RO Recovery*Courtesy of Kevin Alexander, SPI
Amount of Water Loss:163 Billion Gallons
per year
Value of Water Loss: $160M/year
Cross-flow Filtration
• High velocity fluid flow
• Plate & frame; tubular; spiral-wound cartridge assembly
Unknown
• Causes of membrane scaling during RO treatment of CAP water
*(images from eco-tec.com and vsep.com)
Unknown
• Sustainability of brine minimization at 95-99 % water recovery
*(images from vsep.com)
V-SEP System
• Intense shear waves on the face of a membrane
• Solids and foulants to be lifted off the membrane surface
Principles of RO vs VSEP
Qconc
Qfeed
QpermSemi-permeable
membrane
During open valve
period
closed/open
How VSEP WorksSeries LP (in P Mode):
Membrane Area: 16.44 ft2 (1.58 m2)
Hold-Up Volume: 0.8 gal (3 L)
Qfeed
Qperm
Qconc = 0
Semi-permeable membrane
During closed valve
period
VSEP Results
Relationship of closed valve time with water recovery and permeate flux.
• Permeate flow rate decreases as closed valve time increases
• Water recovery increases as closed valve time increases
VSEP ResultsPermeate Flow vs. Water Recovery
• Tradeoff Between Recovery and Membrane Flux
• Increased recovery reduces amount of permeate flow rate
• Must purchase additional V-SEP Machines
• Optimization: MF/Ion Exchange / RO / V-SEP in series
Permeate 0.9 MGD110 mg/l
0.002 MGDTS ~ 10%
Concentrate
Permeate 0.098 MGDTDS = TBD
0.1 MGD6000 mg/l
90% Recovery
Brine
98% Recovery
RO Unit
V-SEP Unit
Influent
1 MGD700 mg/l
IX Unit
Removal ofBarium &Calcium
Future Experimental Work
Desalination Research Facility
Participating Water UtilitiesParticipating Water Utilities
Slow Sand Filtration Reverse Osmosis Concentrate Management
Questions?Acknowledgements
Chris Hill (MDWID)Mike Dew, Jeff Biggs (City of Tucson)Martin Yoklic (ERL, U of A)Dr. Chuck Moody, Eric Holler (BOR)Dongxu Yan, Bob Seaman, Andrea Corral, James
Lykins, Dane Whitmer, Brian McNerney (UA)Special Thanks to Dr. Wendell Ela, Dr. Robert
Arnold, and Dr. Umur Yenal (U of A)
AcknowledgementBureau of ReclamationTucson WaterMetropolitan Domestic Water Improvement
DistrictOro Valley Water UtilityMarana Municipal Water DepartmentFlowing Wells Water DistrictTRIF/WSP