Upload
others
View
2
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Manipulation and transport of pfor an efficient production of H atoms
M. Tajima1,2, N. Kuroda1, P. Dupré2, M. Leali3, Y. Nagata2,4,T. Matsudate1, V. Mascagna3, B. Radics2, L. Venturelli3,
H. Breuker5, H. Higaki6, Y. Kanai2, E. Lodi Rizzini3, Y. Matsuda1,S. Ulmer7, and Y. Yamazaki2
1 The university of Tokyo, 2 Atomic Physics Research Unit, RIKEN, 3 University of Brescia, 4 Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology,5 CERN, 6 Hiroshima University, 7 Ulmer Initiative Research Unit, RIKEN
7 March 2016 (LEAP2016)
Contents
• Direct injection
• H beam in 2012
• Transport of p
• Extraction of p
• H production rate
• Summary
Direct injection methodIn our setup, p are accumulated, cooled, and radially compressed in MUSASHI trap.
ADMUSASHI( p trap)
Direct injection methodIn our setup, p are accumulated, cooled, and radially compressed in MUSASHI trap.
ADMUSASHI( p trap)
CUSPtrap
Then p are injected into pre-loaded e+ in cusp trap to produce H.
Direct injection methodIn our setup, p are accumulated, cooled, and radially compressed in MUSASHI trap.
ADMUSASHI( p trap)
CUSPtrap
Then p are injected into pre-loaded e+ in cusp trap to produce H.
Direct injection methodIn our setup, p are accumulated, cooled, and radially compressed in MUSASHI trap.
ADMUSASHI( p trap)
CUSPtrap
Then p are injected into pre-loaded e+ in cusp trap to produce H.
In this scheme,a temperature of Hdepends onthe relative energyof p comparedto that of e+.
H beam in 2012
In 2012, we succeeded in detecting H beam at 2.7m downstream of the mixing region in cusp trap.
N. Kuroda et al. Nat. Commun. 5:3089 (2014)
H beam in 2012
In 2012, we succeeded in detecting H beam at 2.7m downstream of the mixing region in cusp trap.
N. Kuroda et al. Nat. Commun. 5:3089 (2014)
H beam in 2012
In 2012, we succeeded in detecting H beam at 2.7m downstream of the mixing region in cusp trap.
N. Kuroda et al. Nat. Commun. 5:3089 (2014)
H production reached
its peak about 20s after
the mixing of p and e+
H beam in 2012
In 2012, we succeeded in detecting H beam at 2.7m downstream of the mixing region in cusp trap.
N. Kuroda et al. Nat. Commun. 5:3089 (2014)
H production reached
its peak about 20s after
the mixing of p and e+
Possible reason:
e+ were heated up by 𝐩
The axial energy spread of p at CUSP in 2012
catchingpulse
p
The axial energy spread of p at CUSP in 2012
100 240X [V]
# o
f tr
app
ed p
[a.u
.]
catchingpulse
X
The axial energy spread of p at CUSP in 2012
100 240X [V]
# o
f tr
app
ed p
[a.u
.]
catchingpulse
XThe axial energy spread of 𝐩 at CUSP
was unexpectedly large.
Disadvantage of large axial energy spread of pat CUSP in direct injection scheme
p
Mix as many 𝐩 as possible → hot 𝐇
Disadvantage of large axial energy spread of pat CUSP in direct injection scheme
Avoid too much heating of e+
→ Less 𝐇
p
The axial energy spread of p at CUSP in 2012
p
Desirable
What is the reason of the large axial energy spread of p at cusp?
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 150eVw/ lens & DC coils
Calculated trajectory of p (initial r=0.4, 0.8, 1.2, 1.6mm)
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 150eVw/ lens & DC coils
B field line
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 150eVw/ lens & DC coils
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 150eVw/ lens & DC coils
Far from adiabatic p do not follow B field line
The axial energy spread of p at CUSP in 2012
p
Desirable
We think the reason of the large axial energy spread of p at cusp is non-adiabatic transport. → Realize a transport of p
following B field line more adiabatically.
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 150eVw/o lens, w/ DC coils
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 150eVw/o lens, w/ DC coils
Still far from adiabatic.Low transport efficiency .
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 20eVw/ DC coils (15→50A)
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 20eVw/ DC coils (15→50A)
B field line diverges at the exit of MUSASHI→ Low transport efficiency
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 20eVw/ DC coils (50A) & a pulse coil
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 20eVw/ DC coils (50A) & a pulse coil
p follows B field line.
Calculated trajectory of p
Injection at 20eVw/ DC coils (50A) & a pulse coil
p follows B field line.
This is the way to transport 𝐩 in 2015.
Initial axial energy spread of pextracted from MUSASHI
Charged π from annihilated p were detected by a plastic scintillator.
Scintillator
MUSASHItrap
CUSPtrap
1.5m
Scintillator
MUSASHItrap
CUSPtrap
Initial axial energy spread of pextracted from MUSASHI
2.1 m
Scintillator
MUSASHItrap
CUSPtrap
Initial axial energy spread of pextracted from MUSASHI
1.5m 2.1 m
Scintillator
MUSASHItrap
CUSPtrap
Initial axial energy spread of pextracted from MUSASHI
Extractionfrom MUSASHI
1.5m 2.1 m
Scintillator
MUSASHItrap
CUSPtrap
Initial axial energy spread of pextracted from MUSASHI
1.5 2.1 m
Scintillator
MUSASHItrap
CUSPtrap
Extractionfrom MUSASHI
Initial axial energy spread of pextracted from MUSASHI
H production rate
■: in 2015
●: in 2012
H production rateWe succeeded in a production of H at higher rate just after the mixing started. → Colder H which is desirable for a spectroscopy.
S/N ratio of the H beam detector should be improved.
Zoom ofthe first 1s
H production rate
Another peak was also observed.Some of the e+ were still heated up.
→ The transport should be improved further.
Further improvement
With increased current of DC transport coils by a factor of 3, the axial energy spread of p at cusp becomes smaller.
Calculationassuminga p cloud of 5000K in MUSASHI.
PulseCoil
MUSASHItrap
CUSPtrap
DC transportcoils (150A)
Summary
• For an efficient production of H using the direct injection scheme, we developed the way to extract and transport p at 20 eV, more adiabatically than the previous scheme in 2012.
• We observed a higher production rate of H just after a mixing started. We believe colder H which is desirable for a spectroscopy were produced.
• Further improvement will be realized by a modification of transport coils and tests are ongoing.
Thank you very much for your attention!