Upload
melita
View
51
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Mapping the National Strategy Toward Zero Deaths. Timothy Neuman, PE Chief Highway Engineer and Highway and Traffic Safety Practice Lead, CH2M HILL. NCHRP 17-51 Input to the Development of a National Highway Safety Strategy. CH2M HILL Prime Consultant - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Mapping the National Strategy Toward Zero Deaths
Timothy Neuman, PEChief Highway Engineer and Highway and Traffic Safety Practice Lead, CH2M HILL
2
• CH2M HILL Prime Consultant– Ida van Schalkwyk, Ph.D., Principal Investigator– Tim Neuman, Howard Preston, Tegan Houghton,
Richard Storm, Kim Kolody, Stacey Black• Midwest Research Institute
– Doug Harwood, Ingrid Potts, Jessica Hutton• Prof. Dan Turner, Univ of Alabama (Emeritus)• Independent Consultants
– Scott Newton– Quinn Brackett
NCHRP 17-51 Input to the Development of a National Highway Safety Strategy
3
Where we have been?19
9019
9119
9219
9319
9419
9519
9619
9719
9819
9920
0020
0120
0220
0320
0420
0520
0620
0720
0820
090
5,00010,00015,00020,00025,00030,00035,00040,00045,00050,000
Motor vehicle crash fatalities in the US
(1990 – 2009)
4
• Fatal and serious injury crashes typically involve many contributing factors
• There are proven solutions to reducing crashes and their consequences
• Solutions incorporate the 4Es (Engineering, Enforcement, Education, Emergency Medical Services)
• Solutions include legislative actions which may require political will
What have we learned?
Source: Treat, 1979 as cited in AASHTO Highway Safety Manual
13% VEHICLE
DRIVER(human) 93%
34% ROADWAY(environment)
57
27
633
3
1
5
• Strong partnerships are essential to measurable progress
What have we learned?
6
Data driven processes using science-based approaches produce
measurable outcomes
7
• Safety is not everyone’s top priority– Management systems do not typically address
safety data needs– Program and project development processes
need adjusting– Resource allocations emphasize other priorities
• Safety is not as well understood as it should be
• We can do much better
What else have we learned?
8
The reality -- We lag behind our peers
Source: Global Status Report on Road Safety: Time for Action, WHO, 2009
High-income countries: Fatality rate per 100,000 population
US
9
The nature of the problem will direct how we tackle it
Safety Culture• Organizational• Road Users
Drivers
Vehicles
Vulnerable Users
Infrastructure (multi-modal)
EMS & Public Health
(injury prevention)
Data & Analysis (access to
information and tools)
10
• This must be a data driven exercise
• One size does not fit all– The nature and
severity of the problem varies
– Local culture and political climate varies as well
Addressing the Problem
11
• What is the nature of the problem in the U.S.?
• What real progress have we made (and how far do we have to go) in changing the culture of driver behavior?
• What problems have emerged requiring our attention? (And what emergent problems might we expect or anticipate?)
Mapping the National Strategy means understanding reality
12
The reality--‘Highway Fatalities’ is a rural problem
Source: NHTSA: Traffic Safety Facts – 2008 Data – Rural/Urban Comparison
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%61% 57%
% fa
talit
ies
in r
ural
ar
eas
13
The reality-- ‘Highway Fatalities’ is to a great extent a local problem
51%
66%
54%*
2009 fatality numbers except *
1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 20090
102030405060708090
100
49%63%
31%43%
Drivers: % Restraint Used
14
The reality -- It is way too early to claim victory with respect to restraint use
15
The reality -- Impaired driving remains a significant and stubborn problem
19941995199619971998199920002001200220032004200520062007200820090%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60% 48%
22%
% Drivers in fatal crashes driving with a BAC NE zero
% D
rive
rs in
fata
l cra
shes
16
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0
1,000,000
2,000,000
3,000,000
4,000,000
5,000,000
6,000,000
7,000,000
8,000,000
9,000,000
Motorcyclist fatali-tiesMot
orcy
clis
t fa
talit
ies
Regi
ster
ed m
otor
cycl
es
Source: NHTSA Fatal Analysis Reporting System Encyclopedia, NCSA
The reality – In some areas we have regressed
17
• Young driver licensing• Primary seat belt laws• Automated enforcement• Motorcycle helmets
The reality – Effective legislation is a valuable tool
18
• Motorcycle fatalities• Policies to promote more walking and
bicycle use (growing the population of vulnerable users)
• Distracted driving• Vehicle size and weight (fuel efficiency and
large trucks)• Aging population (elderly drivers)
The reality – emergent problems abound
19
Leadership and Commitment
• Resource allocation• System management (program development)
Re-prioritization
Investments in Continuing Research
Improved/renewed/strengthened partnerships (interagency relationships)
Access to the complete toolbox (infrastructure, education, legislation)
• Society• Within transportation agencies
Cultural Change
Mapping the National StrategyWhat will it Take?
20
• What is Driving us to aspire to Toward Zero Deaths
• What is restraining or keeping us from committing to TZD or achieving this?
Discussion Framework for Roundtable
Driving Forces Restraining Forces
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
21
Toward Zero Deaths
Toward • What is our sense
of urgency ?• Can we commit to
‘the long haul’?
23
Imagine what it will mean if, as a nation, we can’t or won’t commit to TZD?
1990
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
2001
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
2007
2008
2009
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
30,000
35,000
40,000
45,000
50,000
What if we had sustained a 6% annual reduction in
fatalities since 1990?
Motor Vehicle Crash Fatalities in the US
303,000 lives would have been saved
24
Imagine what it will mean if, as a nation, we don’t commit to TZD?
We would have saved the entire population of Riverside, CA
• Multidisciplinary partnering – Include safety culture & non-
infrastructure partners• Organizational change
– Data-driven decision-making– Maximize the benefit of our
investments in terms of fatality reduction
• Reprioritization of agency mission & approach– Safety, mobility, infrastructure
condition– Full integration of safety (rather
than safety projects)• Help change the culture
What can we do?
25
A National Safety Strategy
?
26
What would it take to sustain CONSISTENT and LONG-TERM reductions
towards a goal we can live with ?