Upload
audrey-gaines
View
219
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
March 12, 1989
Washington, D.C.
Background
In 1985, the Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) adopted regulations addressing the problem of alcohol and drug use among railroad employees
This was the direct result of at least 21 significant train accidents involving alcohol or drug use
Background (Cont.)
These accidents resulted in 25 deaths The Railway Labor Executives’
Association filed a lawsuit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California to forbid these regulations
After going through the district court and the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, the case was then heard by the U.S. Supreme Court
Samuel K. Skinner, U.S. Secretary of Transportation
Railway Labor Executives’ Association
Richard Thornburgh, U.S. Attorney General
Lawrence M. Mann
Justices for the Court
Harry A. Blackmun Anthony M. Kennedy (writing for the court)
Sandra Day O'Connor William H. Rehnquist Antonin Scalia John Paul Stevens Byron R. White
Petitioner’s Claim
That regulations requiring the testing of bodily fluids after a train accident do not violate the Fourth Amendment rights of railroad employees
Fourth Amendment
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and
effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and
no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing
the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Decision
Upheld regulations that required railroads to test urine, blood, and breath of employees involved in train accidents, deciding that such tests did not violate the Fourth Amendment
Voted 2-7 in favor of the Petitioner
Personal Opinion
I agree with the decision to uphold the regulations to test bodily fluids after a train accident because railroad employees should not be under the influence of anything while operating a train due to the many dangers involved with them