20
Medical Business Journal March 2013 The Medical Business Journal is a monthly source of up-to-date information on all issues affecting the healthcare industry. Its content ranges from medical coding and billing to healthcare reform legislature and beyond. The MBJ is not affiliated in any way with the Department of Health and Human Services, Medicare, or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services, and is not a substitute for individualized expert assistance. The CPT codes, descriptors, and modifiers are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. For more information, please call MMI at 866-892-2765. Editor in Chief Carleigh Benscoter Contributors Kathy Dyson Jennifer Donovan Janet Salyer Susie M Schlernitzauer Layout & Design Carleigh Benscoter The Medical Business Journal is brought to you by the Medical Management Institute MBJ THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE INFORMED HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL ISSUE 2 VOL. 4 Inside this Issue: CMS News Updates ……………….……………….……………….……..…………. 2 Sequestration: 2% Cuts for Medicare Physicians …………………………...……………. 8 HIPAA Mega Rule …….………………………………………………….………………. 9 Widespread Ignorance about the Sunshine Act ...………..………………………………. 12 Affordable Care Act: Changing the Design of Insurance Coverage ………………...…..….15 Know Your Contracts ……………………………………..…………………………..….16 EHR: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly ………………………………….…………..….17 MMI Updates ………………………………………..……………………………..….18

March 2013 MBJ Issue

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

March 2013 Medical Business Journal. Issue 2, Volume 4

Citation preview

Page 1: March 2013 MBJ Issue

lorem ipsum dolor met set quam nunc parum

Med

ical

Bus

ines

s Jo

urna

l Mar

ch 2

013

The Medical Business Journal is a monthly source of up-to-date information on all issues affecting the healthcare industry. Its content ranges from medical coding and billing to healthcare reform legislature and beyond. The MBJ is not affiliated in any way with the Department of Health and Human Services, Medicare, or the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information with regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold with the understanding that the publisher is not engaged in rendering legal, accounting or other professional services, and is not a substitute for individualized expert assistance. The CPT codes, descriptors, and modifiers are copyrighted by the American Medical Association. For more information, please call MMI at 866-892-2765.

Editor in ChiefCarleigh Benscoter

ContributorsKathy DysonJennifer DonovanJanet SalyerSusie M SchlernitzauerLayout & DesignCarleigh Benscoter

The Medical Business Journal is brought to you by the Medical Management Institute

MBJ

THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE INFORMED HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL

ISSUE 2 VOL. 4

Inside this Issue:CMS News Updates ……………….……………….……………….……..…………. 2Sequestration: 2% Cuts for Medicare Physicians …………………………...……………. 8HIPAA Mega Rule …….………………………………………………….………………. 9Widespread Ignorance about the Sunshine Act ...………..………………………………. 12Affordable Care Act: Changing the Design of Insurance Coverage ………………...…..….15Know Your Contracts ……………………………………..…………………………..….16EHR: The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly ………………………………….…………..….17MMI Updates ………………………………………..……………………………..….18

Page 2: March 2013 MBJ Issue

2

2/22/2013:Five New Provisions of the Affordable Care Act

The U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) today issued a final rule that implements five key consumer protections from the Affordable Care Act, and makes the health insurance market work better for individuals, families, and small businesses.

“Because of the Affordable Care Act, being denied affordable health coverage due to medical conditions will be a thing of the past for every American,” said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius. “Being sick will no longer keep you, your family, or your employees from being able to get affordable health coverage.”

Under these reforms, all individuals and employers have the right to purchase health insurance coverage regardless of health status.  In addition, insurers are prevented from charging discriminatory rates to individuals and small employers based on factors such as health status or gender, and young adults have additional affordable coverage options under catastrophic plans.

2/20/2013: Health Care Law Allows Consumers to Find and Compare OptionsStarting in 2014

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today announced a final rule that will make purchasing health coverage easier for consumers. The policies outlined today will give consumers a consistent way to compare and enroll in

health coverage in the individual and small group markets, while giving states and insurers more flexibility and freedom to implement the Affordable Care Act.  

“The Affordable Care Act helps people get the health insurance they need,” said Secretary Sebelius. “People all across the country will soon find it easier to compare and enroll in health plans with better coverage, greater quality and new benefits.”

Today’s rule outlines health insurance issuer standards for a core package of benefits, called essential health benefits, that health insurance issuers must cover both inside and outside the Health Insurance Marketplace. Through its standards for essential health benefits, the final rule released today also expands coverage of mental health and substance use disorder services, including behavioral health treatment, for millions of Americans.  

2/15/2013:Updates to 2014 Medicare Health and Drug Plans Proposed

Beneficiaries will get greater protections, value, and care in the Medicare services they receive through proposed policies released today by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Today’s 2014 Advance Notice and draft Call Letter takes important steps to improve payment accuracy for Medicare Advantage (Part C) and in Medicare prescription drug (Part D) plans for 2014, without shifting costs to beneficiaries. Since the Affordable Care Act was passed in 2010, Medicare Advantage premiums have fallen by 10 percent and enrollment is expected to increase by an estimated 28 percent through this year. In addition, costs of the defined standard Part D plan will be lower in 2014 than they are in 2013. The standard Part D deductible will be $310, down from

CMS News UpdatesCMS.gov

CMS News Updates

Page 3: March 2013 MBJ Issue

3

$325 in 2013, and cost-sharing amounts will also be lower.

CMS also announced today a proposed rule implementing the Affordable Care Act’s medical loss ratio (MLR) requirements for Medicare Advantage and prescription drug (Part C and Part D) plans that promote greater accountability and transparency. The proposed rule limits how much plans can spend on marketing, overhead, and profit. Similar MLR requirements are already benefiting consumers in the private health insurance market. 

“The Affordable Care Act helps us strengthen Medicare Advantage and Part D,” said Jonathan B l u m , C M S a c t i n g p r i n c i p a l d e p u t y administrator and director of the CMS’ Center for Medicare. “We are working to ensure that people with Medicare have affordable access to health and drug plans, while making certain that plans are providing value to Medicare and taxpayers.”

2/15/2013 :27 Recipients of New Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns Awards

Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) Secretary Kathleen Sebelius today announced 27 recipients of new Strong Start for Mothers and Newborns awards, made possible by the Affordable Care Act.  Up to $41.4 million can be used by states, caregivers and others to find new ways to prevent significant, long-term health problems for high-risk pregnant women and newborns enrolled in Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP).

“Thanks to the Affordable Care Act, we are helping communities across the country improve prenatal care for expectant mothers so that they can have a healthy delivery and a healthy baby,”

said HHS Secretary Kathleen Sebelius.  “The Strong Start initiative will help find ways to reduce the rate of preterm births, which is a public health problem with significant long-term consequences for families and children.”

2/4/2013: CMS Announces New Initiative to Improve End-Stage Renal Disease Care

The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) today announced a new initiative designed to identify, test, and evaluate new ways to improve care for Medicare beneficiaries with End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD).  Through the Comprehensive ESRD Care initiative, CMS will partner with health care providers and suppliers to test the effectiveness of a new payment and service delivery model in providing these beneficiaries with patient-centered, high-quality care.

“This initiative puts Medicare beneficiaries living with End-Stage Renal Disease at the center of their care,” said CMS Acting Administrator Marilyn Tavenner. “Through enhanced care coordination, these beneficiaries will have a more patient-centered care experience, which will ultimately, improve health outcomes.”

Those with ESRD have significant health care needs. These beneficiaries constituted 1.3% of the Medicare population and accounted for an estimated 7.5% of Medicare spending, totaling over $20 billion in 2010. These high costs are often the result of underlying disease complications and multiple co-morbidities, such as coronary artery disease and hypertension, which often lead to high rates of hospital admission and readmissions, as well as a mortality rate that is much higher than the general Medicare population.

Resource: www.cms.gov

CMS News Updates

Page 4: March 2013 MBJ Issue

4

DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICESCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services

Official CMS Information forMedicare Fee-For-Service Providers

R

Medicaid Program Integrity: Preventing Provider Medical Identity Theft3K\VLFLDQV��RWKHU�SURYLGHUV��DQG�EHQH¿FLDULHV�RI�0HGLFDUH�DQG�0HGLFDLG�DUH�DW�ULVN�IRU�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW��7KH�&HQWHUV�IRU�0HGLFDUH��0HGLFDLG�6HUYLFHV��&06��LV�ZRUNLQJ�WR�UDLVH�DZDUHQHVV�DPRQJ�SURYLGHUV�DQG�KHOS�WKHP�SURWHFW�WKHLU�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLWLHV��0HGLFDO�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW�LV�³WKH�DSSURSULDWLRQ�RU�PLVXVH�RI�D�SDWLHQW¶V�RU�>SURYLGHU¶V@�XQLTXH�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLI\LQJ�LQIRUPDWLRQ�WR�REWDLQ�RU�ELOO�SXEOLF�RU�SULYDWH�SD\HUV�IRU�IUDXGXOHQW�PHGLFDO�JRRGV�RU�VHUYLFHV�´�DFFRUGLQJ�WR�6��$JUDZDO�DQG�3��%XGHWWL� LQ� WKHLU�DUWLFOH��³3K\VLFLDQ�0HGLFDO�,GHQWLW\�7KHIW�´�LQ�WKH�³-RXUQDO�RI�WKH�$PHULFDQ�0HGLFDO�$VVRFLDWLRQ�´

Common Provider Medical Identity Theft Schemes

$�FRPPRQ�SURYLGHU�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW�VFKHPH�LQYROYHV�D�IUDXGVWHU�ELOOLQJ�VHUYLFHV�GLUHFWO\�LQ�D�SK\VLFLDQ¶V�RU�RWKHU�SURYLGHU¶V�QDPH�HYHQ�WKRXJK�WKH�FOLQLFLDQ�QHYHU�SURYLGHG�WKH�VHUYLFH��8VLQJ�SK\VLFLDQ�DQG�RWKHU�SURYLGHU�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV�WR�UHIHU�SDWLHQWV�IRU�DGGLWLRQDO�VHUYLFHV�DQG�VXSSOLHV��VXFK�DV�KRPH�KHDOWK�VHUYLFHV��GLDJQRVWLF� WHVWLQJ��DQG�PHGLFDO�HTXLSPHQW�DQG�VXSSOLHV��LV�DQRWKHU�FRPPRQ�VFKHPH�

Main Provider Risk Factors

7KH�SULPDU\�ULVN�IDFWRU�IRU�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW�LV�SURYLGHU�FRPSOLFLW\�LQ�IUDXG�VFKHPHV��3URYLGHUV� ZKR� YROXQWDULO\� SHUPLW� PLVXVH� RI� WKHLU� LGHQWL¿HUV� SODFH� WKLV� LQIRUPDWLRQ� DW�VLJQL¿FDQW�ULVN�IRU�VXEVHTXHQW�WKHIW�DQG�FDQ�FUHDWH�XQLQWHQGHG�FRQVHTXHQFHV��&RPPRQ�H[DPSOHV�RI�ZD\V�SURYLGHUV�DOORZ�WKH�PLVXVH�RI�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV�LQFOXGH�

�� 6LJQLQJ�UHIHUUDOV�IRU�SDWLHQWV�WKH\�GR�QRW�NQRZ��� 6LJQLQJ�&HUWL¿FDWHV�RI�0HGLFDO�1HFHVVLW\��&01V��IRU�SDWLHQWV�ZKR�GR�QRW�QHHG�WKH�VHUYLFH�RU�VXSSO\�

�� 6LJQLQJ�&01V�HYHQ�ZKHQ�GRFXPHQWDWLRQ�GLVSXWHV�PHGLFDO�QHHG�6LJQLQJ�&01V�IRU�PRUH�WKDQ�ZKDW�SDWLHQWV�DFWXDOO\�QHHG��DQG6LJQLQJ�EODQN�UHIHUUDO�IRUPV�

����

3XUSRVHIXO� PLVXVH� RI� PHGLFDO� LGHQWL¿HUV� FDQ� OHDG� WR� VLJQL¿FDQW� FRQVHTXHQFHV��VXFK�DV�FLYLO�PRQHWDU\�SHQDOWLHV��FULPLQDO�¿QHV�DQG�UHVWLWXWLRQ��SULVRQ�WLPH��DQG�H[FOXVLRQ�IURP�0HGLFDUH�DQG�0HGLFDLG��3K\VLFLDQV��DQG�RWKHU�SURYLGHUV��FDQ�EH�KHOG�OLDEOH�IRU�WKHVH�DFWLRQV�HYHQ�ZLWKRXW�HYLGHQFH�RI�RWKHU�IUDXG�

ICN 908265 May 2012

CMS News Updates: HHS Medicaid Program Integrity

Page 5: March 2013 MBJ Issue

5

Medicaid Program Integrity: Preventing Provider Medical Identity Theft

,Q�DGGLWLRQ�WR�SURYLGHU�FRPSOLFLW\�DQG�WKH�YROXQWDU\�PLVXVH�RI�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV��LQKHUHQW�VWUXFWXUDO� ULVNV�DUH�DVVRFLDWHG�ZLWK�SURYLGHU�PHGLFDO� LGHQWL¿HUV��VXFK�DV�SXEOLF�DFFHVV�WR�1DWLRQDO�3URYLGHU�,GHQWL¿HUV��13,V��DQG�SURYLGHU�OLFHQVH�QXPEHUV��2WKHU�ULVNV�LQFOXGH�DQ�RUJDQL]DWLRQ¶V�H[SHFWDWLRQ�IRU�SURYLGHUV�WR�GLVFORVH�LGHQWL¿HUV�ZKHQ�WKH\�DSSO\�IRU�D�SRVLWLRQ��7KH�PRUH�SDUWLHV�ZLWK�DFFHVV�WR�D�SURYLGHU¶V�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV��WKH�JUHDWHU�WKH�ULVN�RI�H[SRVXUH�IRU�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW��([DPSOHV�RI�KLJK�ULVN�H[SRVXUH�LQFOXGH�

�� 5HDVVLJQLQJ�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV�IRU�ELOOLQJ�SXUSRVHV��� 3URYLGLQJ�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV�WR�VWDII��DQG�� $OORZLQJ�PLG�OHYHO�SUDFWLWLRQHUV�WKH�XVH�RI�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV�

Mitigating Risk

3URYLGHUV� DUH� UHVSRQVLEOH� IRU� WKHLU� PHGLFDO� LGHQWL¿HUV�WR� WKH� H[WHQW� WKH\� FDQ� SURWHFW� WKHP� DQG�PLWLJDWH� WKHLU�YXOQHUDELOLW\�WR�WKHIW��)RXU�VWUDWHJLHV�SURYLGHUV�FDQ�XVH�WR�SURWHFW�WKHPVHOYHV�DQG�WKHLU�SUDFWLFHV�LQFOXGH�

�� Actively managing enrollment information with

payers�E\�XSGDWLQJ�WKHP�DERXW�PDWHULDO�HQUROOPHQW�FKDQJHV�HVSHFLDOO\�ZKHQ�

ƕ 2SHQLQJ��FORVLQJ��RU�PRYLQJ�SUDFWLFH�ORFDWLRQV� ƕ 6HSDUDWLQJ�IURP�DQ�RUJDQL]DWLRQ��RU ƕ &KDQJLQJ�EDQNLQJ�LQIRUPDWLRQ�

�� Monitoring billing and compliance processes� E\� VWUHQJWKHQLQJ� SROLFLHV� DQG�SURFHGXUHV� WR�PLQLPL]H� ULVNV�DQG� LPSURYH�RYHUDOO� SURJUDP� LQWHJULW\��3ROLFLHV�DQG�SURFHGXUHV�PLJKW�LQFOXGH�

ƕ $GRSWLQJ�VRXQG�ELOOLQJ�SUDFWLFHV��H�J���UHYLHZLQJ�UHPLWWDQFH�QRWLFHV�� ƕ &DUHIXOO\�UHDGLQJ�GRFXPHQWV�EHIRUH�VLJQLQJ�WKHP��DQG ƕ /LPLWLQJ�DQG�PRQLWRULQJ�WKLUG�SDUW\�XVH�RI�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV�

�� &RQWUROOLQJ�XQLTXH�PHGLFDO�LGHQWL¿HUV�E\�WDNLQJ�VWHSV��VXFK�DV� ƕ 7KRURXJKO\�WUDLQLQJ�VWDII�RQ�DOO�SROLFLHV�DQG�SURFHGXUHV� ƕ 6FUHHQLQJ�HPSOR\HHV� ƕ 6HFXULQJ�DOO�LQIRUPDWLRQ�WHFKQRORJ\��DQG ƕ .HHSLQJ�WUDFN�RI�DOO�SUHVFULSWLRQ�SDGV��DQG

�� Engaging patients in conversation about the risks of medical identity theft E\� ƕ ([SODLQLQJ�WKH�LPSDFW�LW�FDQ�KDYH�RQ�WKHP�DQG�WKHLU�PHGLFDO�UHFRUGV� ƕ /RRNLQJ�IRU�VLJQV�RI�SRWHQWLDO�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW��DQG ƕ :DUQLQJ�SDWLHQWV�RI�WKH�GDQJHUV�RI�FDUG�VKDULQJ�

2

CMS News Updates: HHS Medicaid Program Integrity

Page 6: March 2013 MBJ Issue

6

Medicaid Program Integrity: Preventing Provider Medical Identity Theft

Remediation for Victims

7KH�&HQWHU�IRU�3URJUDP�,QWHJULW\¶V��&3,��JRDO�LV�WR�SURDFWLYHO\�LGHQWLI\�DQG�KHOS�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW�YLFWLPV��&3,�FDQ�

�� +HOS� DEVROYH� WKH� ¿QDQFLDO� SUREOHPV� UHODWHG� WR� WKH� WKHIW�� VXFK� DV� 0HGLFDUH�RYHUSD\PHQWV�DQG�RU�WD[�REOLJDWLRQV��DQG

�� 5HVSRQG�WR�WKH�QHHGV�RI�OHJLWLPDWH�SURYLGHUV�

)RU�DGGLWLRQDO�LQIRUPDWLRQ�DERXW�&3,��YLVLW�KWWS���ZZZ�FPV�JRY�0HGLFDLG,QWHJULW\3URJUDP�'RZQORDGV�FSLLQLWLDWLYHV�SGI�RQ�WKH�&06�ZHEVLWH�

Report It

5HSRUW�VXVSHFWHG�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLW\�WKHIW�WR�

�� Your Local Law Enforcement

�� Your State Medicaid Agency

KWWS���ZZZ�FPV�JRY�0HGLFDUH�0HGLFDLG�&RRUGLQDWLRQ�)UDXG�3UHYHQWLRQ�)UDXG$EXVHIRU&RQVXPHUV�'RZQORDGV�VPDIUDXGFRQWDFWV�SGI&OLFN�RQ�WKH�6WDWH�ZKHUH�\RX�SUDFWLFH�IRU�WKH�DSSURSULDWH�FRQWDFW�LQIRUPDWLRQ��DQG�WKHQ�QRWLI\�WKH�DJHQF\�

�� Federal Trade Commission (FTC) Identity Theft Hotline

3KRQH������������������������,'�7+()7�77<����������������:HEVLWH��KWWS���ZZZ�IWF�JRY�EFS�HGX�PLFURVLWHV�LGWKHIW

�� U.S. Department of Health & Human Services (HHS),

2I¿FH�RI�,QVSHFWRU�*HQHUDO��2,*��+RWOLQH3KRQH������������������������++6�7,36�77<����������������)D[����������������(�PDLO��++67LSV#RLJ�KKV�JRY:HEVLWH��KWWS���RLJ�KKV�JRY�IUDXG�UHSRUW�IUDXG

�� <RXU�5HJLRQDO�++6�2I¿FHKWWS���ZZZ�KKV�JRY�DERXW�UHJLRQV&OLFN� RQ� \RXU� UHJLRQ� IRU� WKH� DSSURSULDWH� FRQWDFW� LQIRUPDWLRQ�� DQG� WKHQ�QRWLI\� WKH�UHJLRQDO�RI¿FH�

Resources

�� )RU� DGGLWLRQDO� LQIRUPDWLRQ� DQG� HGXFDWLRQDO� PDWHULDOV� UHODWHG� WR�provider compliance, visit KWWS���ZZZ�FPV�JRY�2XWUHDFK�DQG�(GXFDWLRQ�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN�0/1�0/13URGXFWV�3URYLGHU&RPSOLDQFH�KWPO�RQ�WKH�&06�ZHEVLWH��RU�VFDQ�WKH�4XLFN�5HVSRQVH��45��FRGH�RQ�WKH�ULJKW�ZLWK�\RXU�PRELOH�GHYLFH�

3

CMS News Updates: HHS Medicaid Program Integrity

Page 7: March 2013 MBJ Issue

7

Medicaid Program Integrity: Preventing Provider Medical Identity Theft

�� 7R�GRZQORDG�DGGLWLRQDO�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN���0/1��SURGXFWV�GHVLJQHG�WR�HGXFDWH�0HGLFDUH�DQG�0HGLFDLG�SURYLGHUV�DERXW�PHGLFDO�LGHQWLW\��YLVLW�KWWS���ZZZ�FPV�JRY�2XWUHDFK�DQG�(GXFDWLRQ�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN�0/1�0/13URGXFWV�'RZQORDGV�6DIH0HG�,'�3URGXFWV�SGI�RQ�WKH�&06�ZHEVLWH��7KHVH�SURGXFWV�LQFOXGH�D�ZHE�EDVHG� WUDLQLQJ�FRXUVH� WLWOHG� ³6DIHJXDUGLQJ�<RXU�0HGLFDO� ,GHQWLW\�´�ZKLFK� LV�DSSURYHG�IRU�&RQWLQXLQJ�(GXFDWLRQ��&(��FUHGLW��3OHDVH�QRWH��\RX�must�UHJLVWHU�DQG�FRPSOHWH�D�SRVW�DVVHVVPHQW�WHVW�DQG�HYDOXDWLRQ�WR�UHFHLYH�&RQWLQXLQJ�(GXFDWLRQ�8QLWV� �&(8V�� RU� &RQWLQXLQJ� 0HGLFDO� (GXFDWLRQ� �&0(�� FUHGLW� IRU� WKLV� FRXUVH�� 7R�UHJLVWHU� IRU� WKLV�FRXUVH��JR� WR� WKH�0/1�:HE�%DVHG�7UDLQLQJ� �:%7��ZHE�SDJH�DW�KWWS���ZZZ�FPV�JRY�2XWUHDFK�DQG�(GXFDWLRQ�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN�0/1�0/13URGXFWV�:HE%DVHG7UDLQLQJ�KWPO�RQ�WKH�&06�ZHEVLWH�

�� )RU� LQIRUPDWLRQ� RQ� KRZ� WR� UHSRUW� IUDXG�� SOHDVH� YLVLW� KWWS���RLJ�KKV�JRY�IUDXG RQ�WKH�,QWHUQHW�

7KH�IROORZLQJ�UHVRXUFHV�ZHUH�XVHG�WR�FRPSLOH�WKH�LQIRUPDWLRQ�LQ�WKLV�IDFW�VKHHW�

�� ³3K\VLFLDQ� 0HGLFDO� ,GHQWLW\� 7KHIW´� E\� 6�� $JUDZDO� DQG� 3�� %XGHWWL� LQ� WKH� ³-RXUQDO� RI�WKH� $PHULFDQ� 0HGLFDO� $VVRFLDWLRQ�´� 9ROXPH� ����� 1XPEHU� ��� 3DJHV� ���� ±� ���� �)HEUXDU\���������KWWS���MDPD�MDPDQHWZRUN�FRP�DUWLFOH�DVS["DUWLFOHLG �������

�� ³3UHYHQWLQJ�DQG�'HWHFWLQJ�3K\VLFLDQ�0HGLFDO�,GHQWLW\�7KHIW´�E\�6��$JUDZDO��&HQWHUV�IRU�0HGLFDUH��0HGLFDLG�6HUYLFHV��&HQWHU�IRU�3URJUDP�,QWHJULW\��)HEUXDU\�����������5HWULHYHG�0DUFK�����������

Official CMS Information forMedicare Fee-For-Service Providers

R

7KLV� IDFW� VKHHW�ZDV�FXUUHQW�DW� WKH� WLPH� LW�ZDV�SXEOLVKHG�RU�XSORDGHG�RQWR� WKH�ZHE��0HGLFDUH�0HGLFDLG�SROLF\�FKDQJHV�IUHTXHQWO\�VR�OLQNV�WR�WKH�VRXUFH�GRFXPHQWV�KDYH�EHHQ�SURYLGHG�ZLWKLQ�WKH�GRFXPHQW�IRU�\RXU�UHIHUHQFH�

7KLV� IDFW� VKHHW�ZDV� SUHSDUHG� DV� D� VHUYLFH� WR� WKH� SXEOLF� DQG� LV� QRW� LQWHQGHG� WR� JUDQW� ULJKWV� RU� LPSRVH�REOLJDWLRQV��7KLV�IDFW�VKHHW�PD\�FRQWDLQ�UHIHUHQFHV�RU�OLQNV�WR�VWDWXWHV��UHJXODWLRQV��RU�RWKHU�SROLF\�PDWHULDOV��7KH�LQIRUPDWLRQ�SURYLGHG�LV�RQO\�LQWHQGHG�WR�EH�D�JHQHUDO�VXPPDU\��,W�LV�QRW�LQWHQGHG�WR�WDNH�WKH�SODFH�RI�HLWKHU�WKH�ZULWWHQ�ODZ�RU�UHJXODWLRQV��:H�HQFRXUDJH�UHDGHUV�WR�UHYLHZ�WKH�VSHFL¿F�VWDWXWHV��UHJXODWLRQV��DQG�RWKHU�LQWHUSUHWLYH�PDWHULDOV�IRU�D�IXOO�DQG�DFFXUDWH�VWDWHPHQW�RI�WKHLU�FRQWHQWV�

7KH�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN���0/1���D�UHJLVWHUHG�WUDGHPDUN�RI�&06��LV�WKH�EUDQG�QDPH�IRU�RI¿FLDO�&06�HGXFDWLRQDO�SURGXFWV�DQG�LQIRUPDWLRQ�IRU�0HGLFDUH�)HH�)RU�6HUYLFH�3URYLGHUV��)RU�DGGLWLRQDO�LQIRUPDWLRQ��YLVLW� WKH� 0/1¶V� ZHE� SDJH� DW� KWWS���ZZZ�FPV�JRY�2XWUHDFK�DQG�(GXFDWLRQ�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN�0/1�0/1*HQ,QIR�RQ�WKH�&06�ZHEVLWH�

<RXU� IHHGEDFN� LV� LPSRUWDQW� WR� XV� DQG� ZH� XVH� \RXU� VXJJHVWLRQV� WR� KHOS� XV� LPSURYH� RXU� HGXFDWLRQDO�SURGXFWV�� VHUYLFHV�DQG�DFWLYLWLHV� DQG� WR� GHYHORS�SURGXFWV�� VHUYLFHV�DQG�DFWLYLWLHV� WKDW� EHWWHU�PHHW� \RXU�HGXFDWLRQDO�QHHGV��7R�HYDOXDWH�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN���0/1��SURGXFWV��VHUYLFHV�DQG�DFWLYLWLHV�\RX�KDYH�SDUWLFLSDWHG�LQ��UHFHLYHG��RU�GRZQORDGHG��SOHDVH�JR�WR�KWWS���ZZZ�FPV�JRY�2XWUHDFK�DQG�(GXFDWLRQ�0HGLFDUH�/HDUQLQJ�1HWZRUN�0/1�0/13URGXFWV� DQG� FOLFN� RQ� WKH� OLQN� FDOOHG� µ0/1�2SLQLRQ� 3DJH¶� LQ� WKH� OHIW�KDQG�PHQX�DQG�IROORZ�WKH�LQVWUXFWLRQV�

3OHDVH�VHQG�\RXU�VXJJHVWLRQV�UHODWHG�WR�0/1�SURGXFW�WRSLFV�RU�IRUPDWV�WR�0/1#FPV�KKV�JRY�

4

CMS News Updates: HHS Medicaid Program Integrity

Page 8: March 2013 MBJ Issue

8

Physicians have struggled to submit Medicare G-codes for electronic prescribing to avoid the 1.5% penalty from Medicare, worked on meaningful use to prevent future cuts, and embraced PQRS to stop value based penalties. In spite of all of that work, it appears that as of April 1, 2013, all physicians will be taking a 2% cut from CMS. Congress has not passed any legislation to resolve the automatic cuts to federal programs. Most programs will see this cut starting 3/1/2013. Some special provisions in the way the sequestration legislation is written will postpone this cut for Medicare until 4/1/2013.

Physicians are not alone in having their funds reduced. All federal programs, including our hospitals and research centers, will see the same decrease in payments. The numbers being reported as the ‘reduced amount’ appear to range from $85 billion to an anticipated $100 billion over the next decade to Medicare. That amounts to estimates of $11 billion to possibly $16 billion a year. The impact to smaller practices that are already struggling under the stress of reduced payments and increased malpractice expenses could be the final push needed to close up shop.

Dr. Robert H. Marmer, a solo ophthalmologist in the Atlanta area for over 35 years shared his perspective on the change. He points out that, “It is almost impossible to grow a practice with this economic uncertainty. A solo practitioner cannot risk taking on new staff or doing marketing to increase patient loads. In fact, we are having to cut back on staff. Our hands are being tied on giving the time to our patients that they deserve. We have to see more and patients to try and stay where we were last year or the year before that.” He continues, “...this is one more cut to the small practice owner. There is only so much left to take before we can’t stay in business. We have more guidelines and requirements added than

ever before in medicine and get less and less for the work.”

While there does not seem to be a lot of good news in the 2% cut, consider for a moment the alternatives that are out there. The proposal from President Obama was to take $400 Billion from health care cuts. The Republican party is asking for even more cuts in the health care budget, to stop the growth of the deficit. The medical director of a mid-size multi-specialty physician group pointed out that while he was not happy about the cut, he did believe that the deficit had to be addressed and that it had to start somewhere.

An article published by Medical Economics points out that there will be significant impact to research grants. These same cuts will also impact the Centers for Disease Control and the National Institutes of Health (NIH). The actual impact to jobs is still unknown but estimates say as many as 400,00 jobs in healthcare could be eliminated in 2013 due to this cut. The impact of sequestration is far greater than just healthcare and the final impacts on our nation are still unknown.

Sequestration2% Cut for Medicare Physicians|Kathy Dyson February 28, 2013

Sequestration

Dr. Robert H. Marmer, Solo Ophthalmologist

Page 9: March 2013 MBJ Issue

9

More  work!??!!  Well,  yes,  but  only  if  your  practice  suffers  a  breach  in  patient  protected  health  information  (PHI).  The  new  HIPAA  “mega-­‐rule”  insures  increased  chances  that  breaches  will  be  

reported.  

Light  bulb:  Called  the  “mega-­‐rule”  because  it  represents  the  largest  set  of  modiHications  to  the  HIPAA  privacy  and  security  rules  to-­‐date.

The  Health  Information  Technology  for  Economic  and  Clinical  Health  (HITECH)  Act  of  2009  requires  covered  entities  to  report  breaches  of  “unsecure”  PHI  to  affected  individuals,  HHS,  and  (for  breaches  affecting  500  or  more  patients)  the  media.  The  original  proposal  granted  the  covered  entity  some  discretion  in  determining  whether  the  breach  caused  signiHicant  harm,  and  if  it  did  not  the  breach  notiHication  was  not  necessary.  Now,  the  new  “mega-­‐rule”  signiHicantly  increases  regulators’  power  to  go  after  HIPAA  violators  and  impose  greater  penalties.

The  HITECH  Act  increased  civil  monetary  penalties  and  established  four  tiers  of  increasing  penalties  according  to  the  degree  of  the  HIPAA  violation:

• Bottom  tier  –  violations  resulting  from  a  provider  “not  knowing”  and  without  investigation,  would  have  gone  unnoticed  (no  signiHicant  harm)

• Second  tier  –  violations  due  to  “reasonable  cause”  as  opposed  to  “willful  neglect”

• Third  and  fourth  tiers  –  violations  as  result  of  “willful  neglect”  

Penalties  at  the  Hirst  and  second  tiers  aren’t  mandatory  but  all  tiers  can  equal  Hines  up  to  $1.5  million/year.

The  Rule  was  published  in  the  January  25th  Federal  Register  and  goes  into  effect  March  26th.    It  plans  the  four  penalty  tiers  while  increasing  the  HHS’  OfHice  for  Civil  Rights  (OCR)  power  in  some  big  ways.  

To  name  a  few:In  cases  of  willful  neglect,  the  OCR  may  continue  investigations  but  has  the  discretion  to  go  directly  to  the  civil  monetary  process.  So  while  the  government  

will  still  consider  information  resolution  and  voluntary  compliance,  they’re  moving  in  the  direction  of  imposing  penalties.

OCR  can  look  at  additional  factors  when  determining  the  amount  of  the  penalty  to  impose  -­‐  for  example,  reputational  harm  to  a  patient  and  past  history  of  an  entity’s  noncompliance.

OCR  has  a  wider  civil  jurisdiction  over  cases  involving  intentional  wrongful  disclosure.    Normally,  this  would  fall  under  criminal  prosecution.    Now,  a  violator  is  subject  to  criminal  penalties,  but  may  be  subject  to  civil  penalties  if  criminal  is  not  imposed.  

In  short,  the  OCR  has  a  lot  of  room  to  impose  penalties.  Furthermore,  the  HITECH  Act  enables  OCR  to  use  the  penalties  it  collects  to  fund  the  HIPAA  audit  process.    

Coincidence?

The  Rule  didn’t  state  what  kind  of  violation  each  civil  monetary  tier  holds.  For  example,  when  you  look  at  the  third  tier  –  its  for  violations  that  involve  “willful  neglect”  but  are  corrected  within  thirty  days.  What  constitutes  a  “correction”?  Policy  change?  Termination  of  business  relationship?  As  you  can  see,  there  are  still    questions  to  be  asked…and  answered.

Reduce your risk with these tips:

• Make  sure  you  are  complying  with  HIPAA’s  privacy  and  security  rules

• Pay  attention  to  the  protection  of  PHI  on  laptops  and  other  mobile  devices

• Don’t  try  to  avoid  scrutiny  by  ignoring  reporting  obligations

• Have  a  process  for  handling  security  breaches• Use  encryption  and  other  tactics  to  avoid  

breaches• Be  careful  about  altering  your  analysis  of  harm  

after  breach• Be  careful  about  what  you  say  in  public  

because  it  can  come  back  to  harm  you• Ensure  your  staff  are  trained  in  HIPAA

Resources:  HHS.gov/ocr,  HHS.gov/ocr/hipaa,  Decision  Health

HIPAA “Mega-Rule”Increased Breach Reporting Puts Another Burden On ProvidersJennifer Donovan | February 20, 2013

HIPAA “Mega-Rule”

Page 10: March 2013 MBJ Issue

10

Cat got your tongue? Is it just me, or does it seem like patients expect everyone in the practice to know every little thing about each nuance of the health care industry? Sometimes I feel if a patient hears the words “healthcare”, “health reform” or “Obamacare” on the radio or any given talk show, it somehow gets flagged in their brain to ask about it at their appointment on Tuesday. As everyone who actually works within the community knows, it is virtually impossible to know everything about everything; there’s just too much out there. However, we can leverage ourselves while providing useful information to our curious patients, if we can anticipate the questions and offer short (but informative) answers.

Here are nine questions patients ask most regarding health reform:

Q: I don’t have insurance. Will I have to get it, and what happens if I don’t?A: Most Americans will have to have insurance by 2014 or pay a penalty. For individuals, penalties start at $95, or up to 1% of income (whichever is greater). They can rise to $695, or 2.5% of income, by 2016. For families, the limit is $2,085 or 2.5% of the household income (again, whichever is greater). Some people can be exempted through an individual

mandate due to financial hardship or religious beliefs.

Q: I want health insurance, but can’t afford it. What are my options?A: Dependent upon your income, you may be eligible for Medicaid, which will expand beginning 2014. Low-income adults, including those without children, will be eligible, as long as their income does not exceed 133% of the federal poverty level.

Do You Have the Answers to Patients’ Most Popular Questions About Health Reform?Jennifer Donovan | February 6, 2013

Health Reform

Page 11: March 2013 MBJ Issue

11

Q: What if I make too much a month for Medicaid but still can’t afford coverage?A: You might still be eligible for government subsidies (on a sliding scale) to help you pay for private insurance sold through state-based insurance marketplaces, called exchanges, which should begin operation in 2014

Q: How will the legislation affect the kind of insurance I can buy? Will it make it easier for me to get coverage, even if I have health problems?A: For those with medical conditions, the law will make it easier for you to get coverage; insurers will be barred from rejecting applicants based on health status.

In the interim, the law creates a temporary “high-risk” pool for people with medical problems who have been denied coverage by insurers and have been uninsured for at least six months.

Q: How does the legislation affect young adults?A: If you’re younger than 26 years old, you’ll be able to stay on your parent’s insurance coverage as long as you are not offered health coverage at work. Additionally, people in their 20’s will be given the option to purchase “catastrophic” insurance that will have lower premiums.

Q: I own a small business. Do I have to buy insurance for my workers? A: This depends on the size of your business. Companies with less than 50 workers won’t face penalties if they don’t offer insurance. Companies can get tax credits to help buy insurance if they have less than 25 employees. Companies with more than 50 employees that don’t offer insurance will have to pay fees of up to $2,000 per full-time employee.

Q: How does this affect those over 65?A: The law makes Medicare preventative services, such as screenings for colon, prostate and breast cancer, free to beneficiaries.

Q: How much is this going to cost? Will my taxes increase?A: The total package is estimated to carry a price tag of over $900 billion over 10 years. With higher taxes and fees and billions in Medicare payments cuts to providers, the package will narrow the federal budget

deficit by $143 billion over the same 10 years, per the Congressional Budget Office.

For those with high income, you will face higher taxes. Starting this year, individuals with earnings over $200,000 and married couples earning more than $250,000 will pay a Medicare payroll tax of 2.35% (up from 1.45%). Additionally, high-income taxpayers face a 3.8% ta on dividends and interest. The law will also limit the amount of money one can put in a flexible spending account to pay medical expenses to $2,500

Q: I already have insurance. What will happen to my premiums?A: It’s hard to predict that at this time. Those who are sick may experience lower premiums because insurers won’t be permitted to charge sick people more. Healthier people might pay more; older people could still be charged more than younger people, but no more than three times as much.

The biggest question is what happens to rising medical costs, which ultimately drive up premiums…we shall see.

Hope this helps answer some of those questions you and your patients may have been scratching your heads about.

Resources: money.CNN.com, healthreform.gov, Kaiser Permanente

Fun FactDid you know there’s an

additional tax if you use an indoor tanning salon? It’s true! In 2010, the government imposed a 10% tax to individuals – aka “tanning tax”.

Health Reform

Page 12: March 2013 MBJ Issue

12

A recent survey of more than 1,000 physicians by the information technology company MMIS shows that much of the medical profession is unfamiliar with the ACA's sunshine provisions even though they have been in the news for several years. More than half said that they did not know that the law requires drug and device makers to report how much they are giving physicians in money, goods, and services, according to a recent MMIS press release.

That news is shocking to say the least, because 63% of those surveyed told MMIS that they are "deeply concerned" that these payments will be available in a public, searchable database. Twenty-one percent said that they will sever a relationship with a company that submits inaccurate information to CMS. To that point, the American Medical Association and other medical societies have worried that erroneous information about how much physicians receive from drug and device makers could hurt their reputations and careers. Anticipating that problem, the ACA gives physicians and industry 45 days to review the data for mistakes and submit any corrections before CMS posts it online. Under the final regulations, if a physician and a manufacturer disagree about what changed hands, CMS will publish the manufacturer's data but flag it as disputed. The data can be revised on the CMS Web site, but only at 12-month intervals.

The skinny on the Sunshine Act regulations that affect youPayments to doctors from drug medical device companies will go public this fall. You may be thinking: “What’s the big deal? I’m not doing anything wrong…am I?”, or likely you’re thinking, “What does that mean exactly?” Whether you have or haven’t wondered how much the Sunshine Act will affect you and your practice, your curiosities should subside after reading this.

First, let’s start with a little background info: Section 6002 of the Affordable Care Act, the Sunshine Act has been a part of federal law since March 23, 2010. It took three years for CMS to formulate a final 285-page rule, effective 60 days from publication in the Federal Register, currently set for publication February 8, 2013.

So, what does this mean today: This final rule will

require applicable manufacturers of drugs, devices, biologicals, or medical supplies covered by Medicare, Medicaid, or the Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) to report annually to the HHS secretary certain payments or transfers of value provided to physicians or teaching hospitals ("covered recipients")

Now, you may be wondering what this will accomplish: “Disclosure brings about accountability, and accountability will strengthen the credibility of medical research, the marketing of ideas and, ultimately, the practice of medicine,” Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa), who co-authored the legislation, said in a statement. “The lack of transparency regarding payments made by the

pharmaceutical and medical device community to physicians has created a culture that this law should begin to change substantially.”

This “culture” has to do with the way pharmaceutical and device manufacturers went about their business. The over-all effect of the Sunshine Act on physician practices is simple. Under Stark Law a physician may not refer patients for designated health services (DHSs) including prescription drugs and devices, where the physician or a close family member has an ownership, or financial relationship. Under the Anti-Kickback Statute, a physician may not prescribe drugs or devices if the physician has been paid in cash or in kind, if one purpose of the payment was to influence referrals.

The Sunshine Act will make it much more difficult to conceal such payments by an industry which has had a storied history of such payments. As officials with the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) put it, “the Affordable Care Act (ACA) calls for disclosing ‘transfers of value’ by drug and device makers to spotlight possible conflicts of interest that may compromise education, research, and clinical decision making, all to the detriment of patient care.” Final regulations released February 1 spell out exactly what these companies must do.

The Sunshine Act RegulationSurprising Results Show Widespread Ignorance About the RegulationJennifer Donovan | February 14, 2013

Senator Chuck Grassley

The Sunshine Act Regulation

Page 13: March 2013 MBJ Issue

13

Here’s a flyby of what CMS has laid out for a timetable in this exercise in transparency:1. August 1, drug and device makers should begin

compiling information on transfers of value to physicians during the last 5 months of 2013. They must forward this data to CMS by March 31, 2014. The agency, in turn, will release the data in a searchable format on a public website by September 30, 2014.

2. Manufacturers and group purchasing organizations will be responsible to report the data including physician ownership and investment interests to CMS by March 31, 2014. Though the “covered recipient” (see #3) they are not required to report. CMS suggests physicians may need to maintain their own records of what they receive or do not receive in case drug and device makers get it wrong. The agency estimates that it will take a medical practice employee about 5 hours a year to do the sunshine bookkeeping for a single physician, who will later need approx. 1 hour, on average, to review it.

3. Payments to a “covered recipient” means:

• a physician, other than a physician who is an employee of an applicable manufacturer, or;

• a teaching hospital

4. Payment includes: consulting fees, compensation for services other than consulting, honoraria, gifts, entertainment, food, travel (including the specified destinations), education, research, charitable contribution, royalty or license, current or prospective ownership or investment interest, direct compensation for

serving as faculty or as a speaker for a medical education program, grants, any other nature of the payment, or other transfer of value.

5. One break for physicians is that payments to speakers at accredited continuing medical education (CME) events need not be reported, even if a drug or device company funds the CME activity. The payment is off the radar as long as the manufacturer does not select the speaker or pay him or her directly (that role belongs to the CME provider). As eloquently put by organized medicine, “...the world of CME is already well policed to root out conflicts of interest and that the regulations would scare off physicians and industry from accredited CME activities.” Well said.

6. There is a de minimis provision of $10 per gift, or annual aggregate of $100, which does not need to be reported (e.g. pens, coffee mugs, etc.). Although, the ACA requires drug and device makers to report any transfer of value to a physician that is worth $10 or more (e.g. speaker's fee or honoraria, a research grant, or an in-kind item or service such as food, travel, lodging, and entertainment), transfers less than $10 — like a Starbucks — are not necessarily reportable unless they add up to more than $100 over the course of 1 year. Excluded altogether are product samples, educational materials meant for patients, and short-term loans of medical devices. Again, another reason to keep your own records and/or set standard policies with your reps in regards to what you do or don’t accept.

7. Discounts and rebates need not be reported.

8. Product samples are excluded from reporting.

The Sunshine Act Regulation

Covered Recipient: Teaching Hospital

Speaker at an accredited CME event

Page 14: March 2013 MBJ Issue

14

9. Penalties for failure to report are $1,000 to $10,000 per payment, which is not reported with an annual limit of $150,000, unless the payment is “knowingly” omitted, in which case the penalty shall be at least $10,000 with an annual limit of $1,000,000.

In additional efforts to prevent any temptations of pass-offs, drug and device makers also must reveal whether a physician or his or her family members have an ownership stake in the company beyond publicly traded stock.

In general, and in closing, it may look like the fine print promises to make the lives of many physicians a little more complicated, right? Well, maybe at first. If you’re worried that the government will now have even more information on you that before wouldn’t have worried you, as long as you are not engaging in criminal activity, it shouldn’t worry you now either. “I think it’s unrealistic to believe that OIG staff will do nothing but query this database and build cases,” a CMS representative states, “I would expect the government to focus first on the drug companies and maybe on doctors receiving large sums.”

Resources: mmis-inc.com , CMS.gov, OIG.gov, MGMA.com

Sunshine Act: Money transfers that must be reported

•Consulting fees;

•Compensation for non-consulting services, such as serving as faculty or speaker in a non-educational capacity or continuing education program regardless of whether it is certified or accredited;

•Honoraria;

•Gifts;

•Entertainment;

•Food and beverages;

•Travel and lodging;

•Education;

•Research;

•Charitable contributions;

•Royalties, copyrights or patent licenses;

•Current or prospective ownership or investment interest;

•Grans; and

•Monies for space rental or facility fees

The Sunshine Act Regulation

Page 15: March 2013 MBJ Issue

15

Effective January 1, 2014, the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (PPACA or just ACA) requires all Americans to have health insurance, either through their work or by purchasing an individual/family policy. The plan designs for insurance policies must be updated for January 1, 2014, to include Essential Health Benefits (EHB’s), meet actuarial values (AV’s), and limit out of pocket cost sharing for individuals and families. These guidelines apply to policies for individuals and families, small groups and all government plans including Medicare, Medicaid, and Tri-care, CHIP and veterans’ healthcare.

On February 20, 2013, The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) released the final rule for Essential Health Benefits (EHB’s) which must be covered by every plan effective January 1, 2014. HHS states the purpose of the essential health benefits (EHB’s) as the following:

1. Help consumers compare & purchase health insurance

2. Promote consistency in plans3. Protect consumers 4. Limit out of pocket expenses

Essential Health Benefits (EHS) have been referred to as Minimum Essential Benefits (MEB). ACA also states that EHB’s must include items and services in the following 10 categories:

1. Ambulatory patient services2. Emergency services3. Hospitalization4. Maternity and newborn care5. Mental health and substance use disorder

services, including behavioral health treatment6. Prescription drugs7. Rehabilitative and habilitative services and

devices8. Laboratory services9. Preventive and wellness services and chronic

disease management

10. Pediatric services, including oral and vision care

EHB’s must be equal to benefits offered by a “typical employer plan.” HHS requires each state to establish a “benchmark” plan based on 2012 plan designs but updated to include all the EHB’s. Insurers may be innovative and offer a variety of plans, but the benchmark must be met. The selected benchmark plans for each state are already finalized for benefit year 2014. The summaries of benefits chosen by each state for the benchmarked plans are available at http://cciio.cms.gov/resources/data/ehb.html.

In addition to EHB’s, starting January 1, 2014, non-grandfathered health plans must meet Actuarial Values (Av’s), or metal levels: Bronze plans: 60%; Silver plans: 70%; Gold plans: 80%; and Platinum plans: 90%. A fifth plan design, Catastrophic-only plans, will be available to young adults and for people for whom coverage would otherwise be unaffordable. These standardized plans will make it easier for consumers to compare their options and find the right plan. These plans designs must be available in the private market and the exchanges.

A final protection for consumers, starting in 2014, is an annual limit on out-of-pocket cost sharing for individuals and families. This guideline is expected to follow the high deductible plan guidelines for out of pocket maximums. While not yet set for 2014, the comparable limit this year is $6,250 for self-only coverage. The purpose for this rule is to ensure that individuals and families with health insurance don’t need to f i le bankruptcy.

Market analysts believe that adding these three criteria to health insurance policies will sharply increase the cost of health insurance. The ten categories of EHB’s go beyond the average major medical policies purchased by consumers today. It is believed that the hardest hit by these increases will be the young, healthy consumers. As ACA final rules are being released frequently, it’s more important now than ever to “Stay Informed on Reform.”

Affordable Care ActChanging the Design of Insurance Coverage | Janet Salyer | Feb 24, 2013

Affordable Care Act

Page 16: March 2013 MBJ Issue

16

There  are  a  myriad  of  reasons  to  know  what  your  contracts  state.    I  can’t  tell  you  how  many  times  I  have  to  refer  to  a  physician’s  contract  before  I  can  move  forward  with  an  analysis  report.

For  purposes  of  this  article,  I  want  to  hone  in  on  one  speciHic  reason:  to  correctly  bill  patients  who  haven’t  met  deductibles.    Check  your  contracts  with  insurance  companies  to  know  what  you  have  to  bill  patients  with  high-­‐deductible  health  plans  (HDHP),  who  haven’t  met  their  deductibles  yet.    Remember,  with  the  start  of  the  year  came  insurance  resets;  patients  likely  haven’t  met  their  deductibles  which  means  the  doc  may  not  see  a  cent  from  the  insurance  company  because  the  practice  is  submitting  the  Hirst  claim.    Additionally,  with  the  surge  in  HDHPs  and  health  spending  accounts  (HSA)  (13.5million  in  2012  from  11.4  million  in  2011)  due  to  Health  Care  Reform,  this  is  something  you  will  see  more  and  more.    

Many  contracts  require  the  allowable  amount  to  be  billed  because  that’s  how  the  insurance  

company  tracks  how  much  of  the  deductible  has  been  met,  but  if  you  can  only  collect  the  allowable  from  the  payer,  you  have  to  know  what  that  is.

The  trick  comes  in  when  multiple  tiers  come  in  to  play.  As  you  may  Hind,  contracted  rates  have  become  easier  to  obtain  from  some  companies  than  others,  but  that  is  the  root  of  how  you  will  be  able  to  Higure  out  what  the  patient  owes  before  they  leave  your  practice.  (Did  you  know  when  a  patient  leaves  your  practice,  the  chances  of  paying  their  bill  drops  an  astonishing  70%?  Plus,  you  incur  postage  cost!)  

Getting  the  rates  ahead  of  time  trumps  trying  to  obtain  the  information  at  the  time  of  service.  Remember,  more  often  than  not  patients  want  to  get  in,  get  out,  get  back  to  work/school/playing  hookey…once  they  see  the  doc,  they’re  out.    Even  if  you’re  super  computer  savvy  and  the  payer  has  a  website,  logging  in  and  Hinding  the  info  you  need  is  much  more  troublesome  and  counter-­‐productive  than  if  you  had  the  rates  loaded  into  your  practice  management  system.    

Knowing  your  rates  also  gives  you  the  leverage  to  determine  whether  you  are  being  reimbursed  correctly.  Now  you  may  be  thinking,  “BUT  some  contracts  require  that  we  wait  for  the  EOB  before  billing  the  patient”…and/or,  “the  EOB  tells  me  what  to  collect”.    Simply  put,  the  game  is  changing  and  ask  yourself,  “Will  the  health  of  your  practice  improve  or  not  if  we  put  ourselves  in  a  position  to  refund  money  as  opposed  to  chasing  it?”    You  may  even  want  to  think  about  a  very  prominent  organization  that  utilized  the  “pay  and  chase”  model…not  a  thorn  in  your  side.    IF  you  do  Hind  you  have  collected  the  deductible  that  the  patient  had  paid  part  or  all  of,  commit  to  returning  overpayments  promptly.

Resources:  Practice  Management  Resources  Group,  CMS,  MGMA.com

Know Your ContractsReview Your Contracts to Keep Your Practice’s Health Intact| Jennifer Donovan | February 18, 2013

Tips for Smoother Billing•Inform patients of practice policies

for payment. Have the conversation before providing services. Then, get the info regarding how much of the deductible the patient has met and have the discussion with them when they arrive so they aren’t surprised.

•Consider dropping contracts with payers that won’t provide rate info. If you can’t get the contract rates, write a letter to the company and copy the state insurance commissioner stating that by not providing the rates, the payer is violating the contract. If this doesn’t get them to produce the rates, considering dropping the contract might be the next best option for plans that don’t have a large number of your patients.

Know Your Contracts

Page 17: March 2013 MBJ Issue

17

The buzz in the industry these days seems to be on EHRs. Some practices that have electronic systems love them, others that have them don’t. A recent report published in Medline Plus stated that even with the $44,000 incentive bonus from the U.S. government, only one in six doctors had adopted EHRs to the level required for the payment. There have been numerous articles written on this subject of late, from several different perspectives – many sides of that same proverbial coin. The whole premise of “electronic” management of patients’ clinical information seemed very promising – and it can be. But it needs to be done carefully and correctly, starting with purchasing the correct system for your office.

There are many benefits to the use of EHRs – this is the GoodThe EHR is a great tool to help practitioners provide higher quality of care for their patients. And this is possible, providing the system is set up and used properly. The shortcuts you take on the front end stand to become a headache for you later, but we’ll get into that in the Bad part.

EHRs also make for ease of record retention, insuring appropriate E/M level compliance, reducing the risk of misfiling or losing documents (oh, did I mention that you need a good back-up system and a recovery plan?). Many of the EHR systems also allow for multiple, concurrent users. Further, they aid in HIPAA compliance, as long as secure passwords are used and care is taken to log off of workstations when they are not in use. EHRs also have the potential to save money on staffing, storage space and document destruction costs.

Some of the things that the EHR will not help – the BadUnless proper training is carried out up front and the system implementation is done properly, you stand to have issues later on when using the system. Pre-defined templates, while they ease the data entry part of the process, may have a tendency to make practitioners lazy. You run the risk of checking an incorrect box, using an incorrect template, or falsely taking credit for a higher level visit than was actually carried out.

There is the auto-populate function - answers to the patient profile, Review of Systems or exam criteria all default to “Negative” or “Normal”. The practitioner is then tasked with changing and explaining anything found to be “Positive” or irregular. There is great potential for disparity in the documentation that can cause a quality of care issue – or when audited, would cause your clinical documentation to be called into question, thus creating an ancillary liability issue.

The flip side to all of the benefits – this is the Ugly Some practitioners are looking at the EHR as a way to “game” the system and increase or maximize reimbursements inappropriately. Cloning has become a word that is now often associated with medical records. It has become a major concern for the Department of Health & Human Services and the Department of Justice that will cause a whole new onslaught of audits. Many EHR systems allow you to cut and paste from one patient encounter to another – hence, the cloning of patient records. It may also allow for carry forward of diagnoses from

prior visits that are not pertinent to the current encounter.

While not inappropriate or necessarily “ugly” many technologically challenged or extremely busy practitioners have initiated the use of scribes – someone tasked with completing the EHR and documenting the outcome of the examination in the physicians’ stead. The practitioner is still responsible for reviewing the clinical documentation and signing off that it is correct. Failure to do so voids the documentation – like the examination or visit was not done at all.

To sum it all up The EHR should be looked upon as a great tool to improve the care you give. But remember the old GIGO philosophy – garbage in, garbage out. Don’t make your new system obsolete and useless before it has had time to prove itself. Do it right the first time and it may just serve your practice well.

Electronic Health RecordsThe Good, the Bad, and the Ugly | Suzanne M Schlernitzauer | February 28, 2013

Electronic Health Records

About the Author: Suzanne M. Schlernitzauer is the President of Integrated Medical Audit Specialists, Inc. (IMAS), a full-service medical

audit and consulting firm in Miami, FL. IMAS serves insurance and reinsurance carriers, TPAs, self-funded employers, hospitals, physician practices and the legal profession. Schlernitzauer has over 40 years’ experience in the health insurance industry and is presently President of the Florida Medical Auditors Association (FMAA).

Page 18: March 2013 MBJ Issue

18

We hope you all are having a positive and productive start to 2013, just like we are at the Medical Management Institute! We have brought on some great new instructors, launched a brand new website, introduced an amazing new membership perk, and have created impressive educational CEU courses and certification programs. We have included as much information as possible on each new item below, however please feel free to contact us if you have any further questions.

New Member Perk: Dyson’s DigestSo you might be wondering why you have been recently receiving an email twice a week with interesting articles, news on our courses, and general coding updates...this is a new perk to our MMI/ARHCP members! Ms. Kathy Dyson, the new Learning Director for MMI, has been putting these together twice a week through a brand new subscription called “Dyson’s Digest.” The information in these articles are also updated twice a week on our blog at http://mmi-classes.com/blogs/dysons-digest, so we definitely suggest that you bookmark this link for future reference. And please leave your comments/questions/insights about the articles at the end of each one- we are very interested to hear what you think!

Brand New CEU Courses

Anatomy & Terminology is a brand new online, interactive course designed for those who are new to the medical coding field, as well as those preparing to transition for ICD-10-CM. This course is worth 12 CEUs and is on a brand new learning system that caters to you the student, offering fun and interactive learning tools such as electronic flash cards, practice quizzes, and supporting PDF documents. You can purchase this on its own, or as a

bundle package if you are renewing your RMC, RMM, and/or RMA. Check it out on our website at http://mmi-classes.com/collections/limited-time-offers/products/anatomy-terminology-in-preparation-for-the-icd-10-transition.

The highly anticipated 2013 Spring Quarter Classes are now available at pre-sale price ($200 discount) until March 20, 2013! Topics include:

• Security Risk Assessment• PPACA• PQRS is Here to Stay• Understand the OIG Compliance Requirements• ICD-10-CM Overview & Implementation

Planning

These are worth a total of 12 CEUs and will be pre-recorded videos with exciting visuals and a powerpoint presentation to follow. Check it out by visiting http://mmi-classes.com/collections/ceu-options/products/sq.

ICD-10-CM Certification ProgramWhile we are all very excited about the updates and changes going on at MMI, this would have to be the most exciting of them all! We will soon be launching an online, customizable ICD-10-CM Certification Program! We have updated the program, so please check out the changes on the guide to the right. We will keep you posted on the pricing, projected launch date, and more on our blog and via email.

Contact Us!Any questions/comments/concerns? Please don’t hesitate to contact us:email: [email protected], phone: 866-892-2765

MMI Updates

MMI UpdatesExciting New Member Perks, CEU Courses, & ICD-10-CM Program

Page 19: March 2013 MBJ Issue

19

ICD

-10

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pl

anni

ng

Adv

ance

d A

nato

my

&

Phys

iolo

gy

Spec

ialty

C

odin

g fo

r IC

D-1

0

ICD

-10

for

Offi

ce

Staf

f

Spec

ialty

C

odin

g fo

r IC

D-1

0

Cer

tifica

tion

Exam

Cer

tifica

tion

Exam

Your

Gui

de to

Bec

omin

g IC

D-1

0-C

M C

ertifi

ed

CER

TIFI

ED

Offi

ce

Read

ines

s fo

r IC

D-1

0M

anag

er

Code

r

Bille

r

Clin

ical

Staf

f

Prov

ider

Basic

C

odin

g fo

r IC

D-1

0

Billi

ng fo

r IC

D-1

0

ICD

-10

for

Offi

ce

Man

ager

s

ICD

-10

for

QH

CP

[Pre

-Req

uisit

e]

Nee

d to

be

Licen

sed

ICD

-10

Doc

umen

tatio

n Re

quire

men

ts

ICD

-10

Impl

emen

tatio

n Pl

anni

ng

ICD

-10

Doc

umen

tatio

n Re

quire

men

ts

ICD

-10

Doc

umen

tatio

n Re

quire

men

ts

ICD

-10

Doc

umen

tatio

n Re

quire

men

ts

Adv

ance

d A

nato

my

&

Phys

iolo

gy

Regi

ster

ed

Med

ical

Bi

ller

Ass

essm

ent o

f IC

D-1

0 Pr

e-re

quisi

tes

MMI Updates

Page 20: March 2013 MBJ Issue

20

Med

ical

Bus

ines

s Jo

urna

l Mar

ch 2

013

MBJ

THE MONTHLY NEWSLETTER FOR THE INFORMED HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONAL

ISSUE 2 VOL. 4