Upload
sherman-thomas
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Strategy Objectives
• Provide a structured approach to supply management• Prioritize and segment suppliers based on importance
– Risk– Annual Spend
• Establish and document a standardized methodology to improve both company and supplier understanding
• Communicate strategic supply objectives• Implement standard performance measures• Facilitate on-going improvement activities
– Business relationship– Process improvement– Cost reduction
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
The 5S of Supply Management
• SORT – Select suppliers for addition to or subtraction from the supply base.
• SET-IN-ORDER – Segment supply base into appropriate categories based on risk and spend.
• SHINE – Survey processes and systems as well as measure overall performance.
• STANDARDIZE – Define responsibilities and audit supply management processes.
• SUSTAIN – Review the performance of overall supply management process.
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SORT]
• Select suppliers to satisfy new or existing requirements– Define requirements– Review existing supply base capabilities– Search for supplier with capabilities– Qualify new supplier
• Remove unnecessary or under performing suppliers– Identify poor performance (delivery, quality, price, etc.)– Identify low business level and / or infrequent purchase activity– Define existing supplier capabilities and eliminate
redundancies
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SET-IN-ORDER]
• Establish A place for everything …– Partnership (High Risk/High Spend)– Contractual (Low Risk/High Spend)– Surveillance (High Risk/Low Spend)– Transactional (Low Risk/Low Spend)
• Segment the supply base into the 4 quadrants – Everything in its place … – Risk analysis (inherent and short-term)– Spend (annual business volume)– Identification of opportunities for changing quadrants
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SHINE]
• Survey– Site surveys– Supplier self assessments– Remote surveys– Third party certifications
• Performance Measurement– Establish a “base line”– Implement performance measures– Conduct periodic performance assessments
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[STANDARDIZE]
• Formalize procedures, schedules, and practices– SORT– SET-IN-ORDER– SHINE
• Review 3S implementation periodically• Train supply management personnel, partnership
teams, and suppliers in 3S implementation• Implement MRP for purchasing and train purchasing
personnel in its use
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management [SUSTAIN]
• Periodic review of supply management process performance– Supply base segmentation– Supplier performance measurements– Critical project update– Supply management process effectiveness
• Annual SUPPLIER DAY for key suppliers– Rewards and recognition– Business review– Strategic planning inputs– Performance review and feedback
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Implementing 5S Supply Base Maintenance
Worldwide Supply Strategy
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SORT]
• Select suppliers to satisfy new or existing requirements– Define requirements– Review existing supply base capabilities– Search for supplier with capabilities– Qualify new supplier
• Remove unnecessary or under performing suppliers– Identify poor performance (delivery, quality, price, etc.)– Identify low business level and / or infrequent purchase activity– Define existing supplier capabilities and eliminate
redundancies
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SORT]
• Wastes Avoided by SORT
– Waste of clerical activity: too many suppliers
– Waste of disruptions: excessive sales calls
– Waste of poor quality / delayed shipments: high risk suppliers receive inadequate communication / follow-up
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SORT]
• Value contribution by SORT
– Reduced administrative costs (reduced # of suppliers)
– Improved quality (choosing best suppliers)
– Improved on-time delivery (choosing more reliable suppliers)
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SET-IN-ORDER]
• Establish A place for everything …– Define segmentation criteria (e.g., spend and risk)– Establish guidelines for segment improvements
• Segment the supply base into the 4 quadrants – Everything in its place … – Assign EVERY supplier to an appropriate segment– Establish supplier-specific improvement plans as appropriate
for the assigned segment– Ensure cooperation of affected parties– Implement improvement plans
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SET-IN-ORDER]
• Wastes Avoided by Set-in-Order– Waste of clerical activity: too many suppliers– Waste of travel: visiting the wrong suppliers– Waste of travel: lack of focus during visits– Waste of disruptions: excessive sales calls– Waste of poor quality / delayed shipments: high risk
suppliers receive inadequate communication / follow-up– Waste of money: paying too much – Waste of money: participating in bidding for items that will not
be moved
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SET-IN-ORDER]
• Wastes Avoided by Set-in-Order
– Waste of travel: visiting the wrong suppliers
– Waste of travel: lack of focus during visits
– Waste of poor quality / delayed shipments: high risk suppliers receive inadequate communication / follow-up
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SET-IN-ORDER]
• Value contribution by SET-IN-ORDER
– Reduced costs: reduced # of suppliers, more appropriate actions with high spend suppliers
– Improved quality: implementing improvement plans
– Improved OTD: implementing improvement plans
– Reduced lead time: implementing improvement plans
– Enhanced design assistance: partnership focus
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
• Allows targeted control (risk control, cost control, inventory control)
• Enables targeted improvement (partnerships, LTAs, surveillance, etc.)
• Makes the best use of limited supply management resources (strategic, supply engineering, etc.)
• One size does not fit all
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
10% of Suppliers
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
10% of Suppliers
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
70% of Suppliers
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
10% of Suppliers
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
Reduce risk thru redesign, manage risk thru partnerships
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Partnership
Criteria• High Risk/High Spend suppliers• Strategic, long-term relationship• Common business philosophy
Activities• Routine visits/annual surveys (ISO – annual
periodicals, re-cert every 3 years)• Active continuous improvement initiatives• SWOT analysis and FMEA
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supplier Partnerships
• Strategic supply agreement objectives– Specify partnership activities on both sides– Communicate volume expectations– Clarify quality requirements– Document design control, change notification specifics, and
other details of the business relationship– On-going process improvement/cost reduction commitments– Identify key contacts in both organizations
• Periodic supplier surveys, including routine visits to/from both companies
• Participation in forecasting and strategic planning activities related to relevant products
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
Consolidate
Consolidate & Reduce RiskReduce Risk
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Surveillance
Criteria• High Risk/Low Spend suppliers• Monitoring relationship• Business/technical risk assessment
Activities• Routine surveys• FMEA (risk assessment/prioritization of risks)
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Contractual
Criteria• Low Risk/High Spend suppliers• “Arms length” relationship• Selection based on price
Activities• Group leverage• Free Markets On Line reverse auctions• Long Term Agreements
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
10% of Suppliers
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
10% of Suppliers
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
70% of Suppliers
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
10% of Suppliers
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Classifying inventory (or suppliers) according to some measure of importance (usually annual spend) and allocating control efforts accordingly.
AA - very important
BB - moderately important
CC - least important Annual Spend
AA
BB
CC
High
Low
Few ManyNumber of Suppliers
ABC Classification System
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
ABC Analysis
A Suppliers20% of the suppliers
80% of the annual spend
B Suppliers30% of the suppliers
15% of the annual spend
C Suppliers50% of the suppliers
5% of the annual spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segment Pareto: Spend
20% of $$$
80% of Suppliers(B and C Class
Suppliers)
80% of $$$20% of Suppliers
(A Class Suppliers)
Low HighAnnual Spend
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segment Pareto: Risk
80% of RiskOnly 20% of Suppliers
20% of Risk
80% of Suppliers
High
Low
Ris
k
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Segmentation Matrix
Surveillance(High Risk – Low Spend)
10% of Suppliers
Partnership(High Risk – High Spend)
10% of Suppliers
Transactional(Low Risk – Low Spend)
70% of Suppliers
Contractual(Low Risk – High Spend)
10% of Suppliers
High
Low High
Ris
k
Annual Spend
Consolidate
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Transactional
Criteria• Low Risk/Low Spend suppliers• Approximately 70% of suppliers• Convenience relationship• Transaction cost vs. price
Activities• Move to Contractual through consolidation• E-Business purchases• Minimize administration costs (distribution, supplier
managed inventory, etc.)• Carry higher levels of inventory
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Transactional [Consolidation]
Move to Contractual through consolidation• Review all suppliers with low spend and / or low
account activity• Note redundancy in capabilities• Consolidate buying activity with Best-in-Class suppliers• Consolidate buying activity with competitive distributors
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[SHINE]
• Survey– Define customizable survey process that may be used for any
supplier in any segment– Train teams in how to survey a supplier
• Performance Measurement– Ensure measures adequately describe success, particularly
for teams– Establish a “base line”– Implement performance measures– Clearly define required performance level– Conduct periodic performance assessments
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management[STANDARDIZE]
• Formalize procedures, schedules, and practices– SORT: survey procedures and schedules– SET-IN-ORDER: segmentation, partnership, SWOT,
Production Part Approval, and Failure Modes & Effects Analysis processes – also SSA and LTA documents
– SHINE: Surveys, procedures for 3rd party certification, and self-assessment
• Quarterly 3S supply group reviews• Incorporate 3S duties into personal plans• Train supply management personnel, partnership
teams, and suppliers in 3S implementation with annual reviews
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Management [SUSTAIN]
• Periodic review of supply management process performance (Board Level)– Supplier performance measurements– Critical project update– Supply management process effectiveness
• Annual SUPPLIER DAY for key suppliers– Rewards and recognition– Business review– Strategic planning inputs– Performance review and feedback
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Supply Strategy Summary
• 5S provides a structured approach to supply management.
• All suppliers will be ranked based on importance.• The method for improving suppliers will be documented
and communicated. • Standard performance measures will be adopted, while
still allowing for customized partnership measures.• The 5S approach will facilitate on-going supply
improvement activities resulting in near-term and longer-term improvements in delivery, lead time, price, quality, and design support.
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
Steps in ImplementingThe 5S’s of Supply Base
Management
Brooks Instrument - 2001
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
5S: Next Steps Checklist
SORT Perform a quick sort of the existing supply base
Poor performers (delivery, quality, cost) Low purchase volume Redundant capabilities
Identify capabilities to add New requirements Expanded capacity
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
5S: Next Steps Checklist
SET-IN-ORDER Agree on segmentation criteria Segment all suppliers into appropriate categories Establish supplier-specific improvement plans as
appropriate (See segmentation checklists) Ensure cooperation of process owners (purchasing,
manufacturing, engineering, supplier) Includes orientation meeting (purpose, philosophy, process,
etc.) May include ongoing team participation
Rank improvement opportunities and implement in order
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
5S: Next Steps Checklist
SHINE Define customizable survey process Train survey teams and lead auditors Define measures (Relate to strategic objectives)
Supplier measures (general, segment-specific, supplier-specific)
Customer-supplier team measures Brooks Instrument supply-related measures (e.g., payment
performance)
Establish measurement performance baseline Establish required performance levels Schedule performance assessments
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
5S: Next Steps Checklist
SHINE Define customizable survey process Schedule audit team training Define measures (Relate to strategic objectives)
Supplier measures (general, segment-specific, supplier-specific)
Customer-supplier team measures Brooks Instrument supply-related measures (e.g., payment
performance)
Establish measurement performance baseline Establish required performance levels Schedule performance assessments
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
5S: Next Steps Checklist
STANDARDIZE Document survey procedures Document segmentation (emphasizing key supplier
partnerships and surveillance suppliers Document supplier management processes
MRP procedures and reviews Team guide for partnerships SWOT analysis guide Production Part Approval Process procedure Failure Modes and Effects Analysis procedures Strategic Supplier Agreement
Train supply personnel in supply management processes
Incorporate 3S duties into personal plans
March 8, 200121 November 2000 Supply Strategy Profitability Review
5S: Next Steps Checklist
SUSTAIN Schedule board level supply management review
Document for ISO management review Supplier performance measurements Critical project update Supply management process effectiveness
Plan annual supplier day for key suppliers (prior to Brooks Instrument strategic planning process)