Upload
vuongtruc
View
230
Download
2
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
1
Marginal-marine depositionalenvironments
• Deltas: high sediment supply causes sediment to progradeinto standing body of water
• Beaches: wave and current energy produces well sortedsand, characteristic beach-face profile
• Barrier Island Systems: beach ridge separated from coastby low-energy lagoon
• Estuaries: drowned river valleys, low sediment supply,typical of transgressive coastlines
• Tidal Flats: low-energy mud flats between low and hightide
Coarsening Upward SequenceCretaceous Mesaverde Fm, UT
2
Deltas where rivers entering a larger body of water bring in more
sediment than can be carried away by currents or gravityBasic Requirements:
1. stable, shallow shelf2. abundant supply of sediment
Active:– prograde, shift, subside
Importance:– Volumetrically - large component of basins– Coastline stability;– Ecology; fisheries– Economic; coal, oil & gas
• Swampy (coals)• Rapid accumulation and burial of organic matter
3
Off Shore Drilling, Mississippi Delta
Deltas• Shape & Size
– Triangular in plan view, wedge-shaped (x-section).– 100-1000 km2 in area & km’s in thickness (w/ subsidence).
• Major Influencing Factors1. rivers
• Sediment load• Density contrast w/ ocean/lake
2. tides• range
3. wave action• Strength, frequency
4. Sea level• Holocene-rising
4
Influencing Factors
Salinas River (Winter 2005)
5
Buoyancy
Partially-Mixed Estuary
Highly stratified (or salt wedge) estuary
Delta Depositional Environments• delta plain (topsets)
– meandering floodplain & distributaries, swamps, channel,bar complex - channel sands/silts
• delta front/slope (foresets)– sand/silt grades to silt/clay– 1 to 20°
• prodelta (bottom sets)– Clay/mud
6
prodelta deposits
U. Carboniferous, S. Wales
3-types of River DeltasBased on dominated
depositional process:1. Fluvial Dominated2. Tide Dominated3. Wave Dominated
7
1. Fluvial DominatedSediment laden riversDepositional pattern/facies
influenced by1. Sediment load2. Grain size3. Velocity4. Flux rate (seasonal flooding?)5. River/Basin Density Contrasts
a) Homopycnal - DR=DB
b) Hyperpycnal - DR>DB
• floods (sediment laden)c) Hypopycnal - DR<DB
1. Fluvial DominatedHomopycnal - DR=DB
– Thorough mixing - rapid deposition of sediment load– Coarse grained (gravel/sand) rivers
• Gilbert type delta– Topset, foreset (up to 20° dip), bottomset succession
8
Gilbert type delta
• foresets
1. Fluvial DominatedHypopycnal - DR<DB Buoyancy Dominated
– River / ocean or saline lake (common in marine basins)– Horizontally oriented plane jet– Deposition - suspension
• Gradational sorting• Flocculation of clays
– Large Delta front• Foreset dips 1-2°
9
1. Fluvial DominatedBouyancy vs. Friction
Dominated• Dependent on
– Density contrasts• Hypopycnal -Flow
detaches from bed• load
– Velocity• Fast-friction dominated
– Sediment texture (size)– Water depth
• Shallow-friction• Deep-buoyant
Mississippi River• Birdsfoot-type Delta• Buoyancy dominated
Depositional Facies?• Interdistributary Bay/Marsh• Natural levee
- Poorly sorted, irregularly beddedsands/silts
• Delta-front, sand bars- X-beds, cut n fill, ripples
• Prodelta clays
10
Mississippi River• 7 distinct sedimentary lobes
•Abandoned channels
Atchafalya River• River Avulsion
11
Fluvial dominated (i.e., Miss.River) - Vertical Succession;
• Progradation of delta• Shallowing (Coarsening)
upward sequence1. Shelf - fine muds2. Prodelta3. Distal bar4. Mouth bar/Channel5. Beach6. Overbank7. interdistributary deposits8. Bay Marsh deposits
Delta Sequence, Coarsening Upwards
U. Carboniferous, S Wales
mudstones
sandstones
X-bedded sandstones
12
Delta Sequence, Channel Cut
U. Carboniferous, S Wales
2. Tide Dominated• Strong Tidal Currents - Bidirectional currents redistribute
river mouth sediments– Sand filled, funnel shaped distributaries– River mouth bar - reworked into linear ridges
• Key Variables– Tidal Range
13
Bidirectional Flow(tidal) Bedding
• Flasar
• Wavy
• Lenticular
Ganges-Brahmaputra
• 3 x area of Mississippi• tidal range: 2 m• Low wave energy• Seasonal discharge (monsoon)
– Sand transport/load high– Braided stream
• Depositional facies– Tidal flats
• Flasar bedding– Natural levees
• Poorly sorted/coarsening upward,x-beds
– Interdistributary Flood basins– Tidal sand bars/channels
14
3. Wave DominatedWaves modify distributary mouth deposits
– Longshore current-redistribute sediment along shore– Smooth delta front– Absence of interdistributary bay mud– Barrier bars, spits– Beach ridges– Marshes
Sao Francisco Delta, Brazil
• Tidal range: 2 m• Wave Power: 100x Miss./Ganges• Depositional Facies
• Beach-ridge sands aligned parallel to shoreline-sand derived mainly from shelf
• Dunes• Fluvial channel • Channel marsh/mud
15
Wave Dominated Delta
16
Nile River Delta
Other Deltas
• Mixed Deltas- Waves/Tides
• Braided Delta- hi-sed load
• Fan Delta• Coastal Mtns• Alluvial fan
17
Copper River Delta, Alaska• Extreme tidal range (3 m) + Big Waves
General Sediment Characteristics• Upper Delta Plain Sediments
– Above high tide– Channel/levee migration,
overbank flooding, swamps• Lower Delta Plain Sediments
– Low to high tide– Migrating tidal channels,
levees, bays, marshes, swamps• Subaqueous Delta Plain
– Below low tide– Sands near river mouths, finer
sands/silts distal bar, silts claysprodelta
18
Progradation• Active delta systems
1. prograding2. switching channels.– build by lateral accretion.– time-transgressive– Coarsening upwards (CU)
• General delta depositional facies:1. complex of discontinuous sandy lenses set within a
silt/mud wedge.2. channel sands
– crossbeds, ripple cross-laminations, scour-and-fill structures,and may contain discontinuous clay lenses.
3. Interchannel areas• finer-grained muds & clays & organic matter
Prograding Deltas, Coarsening Upward Sequence
KR Mesaverde Fm,UT
19
Distal, thin-bedded fine mud
Mesaverde Fm, UT
Mid-Delta, fine grain sands, muds
20
thin coal (delta top marsh)
Low-standDeltas
• Gulf of Maine– Sea level rise
m= mud (modern)d=deltagm=glacial marine
21
Eberswalde delta
Beaches and Barrier Islands
• Classification by tidal range:1. Microtidal 0-2 m2. Mesotidal 2-4 m3. Macrotidal >4 m
22
Coastlines/Beaches
23
Offshore to Onshore
• Offshore - below storm wave base– Bioturbated muds, thin sand layers
• Shoreface - storm wave base to sea level– lower - below fair weather wave base (<10-20 m)
• wave effect is weak• Fine sand, muds - Planar lamination
– upper - fair weather base to low tide (surf zone)
Lower shoreface
• Mud interbedded with thin lenticular fine grainsand lenses (Pleistocene (Eemian), Denmark)
24
• Upper Shoreface– Erosion in winter, multi-directional flow– Trough x-beds, low angle planar x-beds,– Landward dipping planar reflectors in shoreface/foreshore transition
• Foreshore (includes swash zone)• Coarser sands• Gently seaward dipping (2-10°), laminated planar bedding
Shoreface to foreshore to Bedforms
biot
urba
tion
25
Shoreface
• Shannon Sandstone Member trough-cross-beddedsandstone, Edgerton, Wyoming (USGS)
26
• Backshore– Berm - sandy terrace, horizontal to landward dipping
plane beds– Dunes, eolian trough, x-strata, meters thick
27
• Backshore– Washover fan, landward dipping horizontal strata, thin,
lobate sheets– Lagoon - laminated, fine grain silt and clay, organic
rich
Back Beach Erosional/DepositionalFeatures
28
Wave Refraction• What happens to as a wave line approaches a beach?
– shallow water - Speed (m/s) = 3.1 √ d
• bottom interference (L /2)– leading edge feels bottom first- wave line to bend
29
LONGSHORE TRANSPORT of SEDIMENT
longshore current - wavesstrike at an angle- net motion parallel to
shorevelocity (0.3 to 1.0
m/sec) controlled by:1. beach slope2. angle of breakers3. size of waves
Long shore drift -“river of sand”
• transport of sand1. suspension2. saltation– sand to pebble size clasts– Low-angle cross bedding, imbricated
pebbles• Equilibrium - fine balance ~ current
velocity & sediment load– disrupt balance ~ erosion or deposition
Monterey Bay, CA
30
Long-shore DriftDepositional
Features
• Spits• Bay Barriers• Barrier Islands
31
Lateral accretion of spitMost features related to
long shore drift• HOW?
– Current loses velocity-drops sediment
Spit; Racoon Key, SC
• Large scale (2 m) high angle, x-beds– Plio-Pleistocene, London Clay, Essex
32
bay barrier
Barrier Islands• Long, narrow accumulations of sand - wave
dominated coasts• Small to moderate tidal range
– Microtidal, Mesotidal (<4 m)– Wave energy concentrated - transports sand
– Barrier Beach– Lagoons– Marsh
33
LAGOONScoastal bodies of shallow water, w/ restricted
connections to the sea, bounded by a reef or islands– Low energy - tidal currents– Moderate Salinity variations - brackish, salty– Muds, silts, organic matter, shells & washover sand (floods)
Estuary/TidalFlat
• Mud• Flaser beds• Sand/mud• Sand
– x-beds,bidirectional
34
Sunburst Member of the Lower CretaceousKootenai Formation, western Montana
35
Flaser Bedding - symmetric Wave-ripples
• Sunburst Member of the Lower Cretaceous Kootenai Formation, westernMontana (Schwartz1 and Vuke, 2007)
Rhythmic mud and bioturbated sandstone tidal laminations.
• Sunburst Member of the Lower Cretaceous Kootenai Formation, westernMontana
36
• Sunburst Member of the Lower Cretaceous Kootenai Formation, westernMontana
Biweekly tidal cycles?
37
Lagoons and Coastal Waterways
Beach
Dunes
Barrier Islands/Lagoons
Lagoon
Depositional Facies & Sealevel• interbedded & interfingering sandstone, shale, siltstone, &
coals (w/oyster shells)• Vertical sequence - sealevel & sediment supply
38
Vertical Succession;Barrier Island, BackBeach Lagoon
Shallowing upward sequence• Mid/Upper-Shoreface
– Plane bed sands– laminations
• Channel– Trough X-bedded sands
• Marsh-tidal flat– Sand, coal
• Subtidal lagoon– Shale, oysters
Cretaceous, St Mary River Formation,Southern Alberta Canada
Channel Cap - trough x-stratification
39
Prograding Beach and Barrier IslandSystem
Tidal Flat Facies
40
Idealized VerticalSuccession (offshore-onshore)
• Progradation• Shallowing upward
sequence– increase grain size– Decreased burrowing
• Holocene– Sealevel rising– Trangressive sequence