Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Syed Raza Ali [email protected]
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework
OpenRisk Workshop SYKE, Helsinki, Finland | 13th June 2017
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 3
Icebreaker
o Background:• MSc. Engineering Dynamics & Control• BEng. Aerospace Engineering• Flight Test Certifications
o Current Status:• MaRiSa Research Group @ WMU
Research Assistant 3rd Year PhD Student
• Technical Officer OpenRisk Project
o Research Areas:• Risk, Safety & Reliability Assessments• Risk-Based Marine Spatial Planning• Accident Investigation
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 5
Dynamic vs Static Risk Assessment
o Static risk assessment:• Non-operational
Does not focus on one operation, but covers many ship movements in an area
Focuses on a wide time period • Proactive – generally conducted during the
planning phase • Probabilistic• More ‘controllable’ parameters that can be
changed• Low certainty about information• High availability of time & resources• Outcomes directly effect dynamic risk
assessment conducted during an operation
o Dynamic risk assessment:• Operational
Generally focuses on one single operation Focuses on a specific time period during the
operational phase of a system• Reactive – usually conducted during an on-
going operation • More deterministic than probabilistic
Either the consequences of an event are known and/or the probability of the event is 1 or 0
• Less ‘controllable’ parameters The few ‘controllable’ operational parameters
(e.g. ship speed, rudder angle) may be used to quantify the risk in a scenario
• High level of certainty• Low availability of time & resources
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 6
Static Risk Assessment
o Sophisticated NRA frameworks/models already exist (Mehdi & Schröder-Hinrichs 2016)
• Significant literature on contact, collision, grounding models• E.g. of previous work includes NRA models for bridges, quays, oil platforms
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 7
Static Risk Assessment
o Consequence model selection was partially based on literature review & surveys• Included a comprehensive review of 50+ contemporary damage assessment models• Presented at Intl. Conference on Ships & Offshore Structures (ICSOS) 2016
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 9
Dynamic Risk Assessment
o Why: lack of communication between operational & non-operational maritime users
• Survey of 122 seafarers shows 104 are unaware of any NRA studies around OREIs
• Results of a typical NRA often ‘meaningless’ for seafarers Exception: if a risk-control option is integrated as a result of the NRA
that influences maritime operations
o What: dynamic risk model that can be integrated as a decision support system
• Based on ship manoeuvrability & hydrodynamics Relates the probability of an accident to the safe manoeuvring area
available to a ship• Initially developed for maritime collision avoidance• Developed from the principles for ACAS/TCAS used in the
aviation industry
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 11
Dynamic Risk Decision Support System: Future Work
o Several potential future developments:
• Incorporate drift envelope calculations
• Integration with AIS data (variant already been demonstrated successfully by Nakano & Hasagawa in 2012)
• Potential integration of consequence assessment based on ship speed & rudder angle at time of collision, contact or grounding
• Integration with KPIs?
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 12
Improving Input Data for Risk Assessment Processes
o MaRiSa Simulator Lab:• DNV-GL certified, multiple simulators:
Desktop ship handling– Basic navigational equipment as
specified by SOLAS– Internal Communication – e.g. – engine
room to bridge– External Communication – e.g. – VTS
Safety & Security Training– Virtual-reality– Simulates on-board accidents
HECSALV– Damage Stability simulator
Manoeuvring station– Predictive ship manoeuvres
Engine room simulator
• SenseFloor to track movement on bridge
Maritime Risk Assessment & the ISO Framework | 13
Improving Input Data for Risk Assessment Processes