Upload
arvind-mani
View
315
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Market Access Climate Change: the Evolving Impact of Product Listing Agreements
October 30, 2015 Arvind Mani, Director of Market Access and Policy Research
PDCI Market Access: Background
Established in 1996, PDCI is Canada's leading pharmaceutical pricing and reimbursement consultancy
Based in Ottawa and Toronto, with a staff of 19 featuring senior, experienced consultants
2
O tta w a
To r o nto
About PDCI
Outline
Introduction
Module 1 pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance Updates
Module 2 Private Payer Product Listing Agreements
Question and Answer Period
3
Webinar Objectives
• Recent developments at the pCPA • Private payer product listing agreement
New Era, “Sunny Ways”
“We will join provincial and territorial governments to negotiate better prices for
prescription medications and to buy them in bulk – reducing the cost governments pay to purchase drugs.”
“We will consult with industry and review the rules used by the Patented Medicine
Prices Review Board to ensure value for the money governments and individual Canadians spend on brand name drugs.”
5
Introduction
Source: Liberal Government- Investing in Health and Homecare; Huffington Post (2013 article)
Question 1
Given the Liberal government’s interest in bulk purchasing to reduce costs, how likely do you think it is that the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance
(pCPA) will be the starting point for some form of national Pharmacare program?
a) Highly Likely b) Likely c) Neutral d) Unlikely e) Highly Unlikely
6
Introduction
Question 2
Given the Liberal government’s interest in reviewing the rules of the PMPRB, do you believe the federal government will aim to make this regulatory body
more “relevant”?
a) Yes b) No
7
Introduction
Canada’s Healthcare
Population: 35.5 million Federation of 10 provinces and 3
Territories Health care system is government
funded – Universal, comprehensive, accessible,
portable, publicly administered – “Comprehensive” coverage includes all
physician and hospital costs but not cost of prescription drugs outside hospital
8
Introduction
13.79
8.26
4.68
4.20
1.29
1.13
0.943
0.7539
0.5278
0.1464
0.0441
0.0374
0.0369
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00
Ontario
Quebec
British Columbia
Alberta
Manitoba
Saskatchewan
Nova Scotia
New Brunswick
Newfoundland and Labrador
Prince Edward Island
Northwest Territories
Yukon
Nunavut
Estimated 2015 population by province and territory (in Millions)
Source: Stats Canada (2015)
Who Funds Prescription Drugs?
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) , Prescribed Drug Spending in Canada, 2014: Focus on Public Drug Programs (Published 2015)
Public Federal/ Provincial Drug
Plans Hospital in-patients
Separate Cancer Agencies
Private Insurers Employer sponsored drug coverage for employees
and their families
Out of Pocket No coverage / uninsured /
underinsured Non-reimbursed drugs
Deductibles / co-payments
% Distribution of Rx Drug Expenditures Canada 2014
9
Introduction
Public Payers
42%
Private Insurers
36%
Out of Pocket
22%
Prescription Drug Landscape: The Market
10
Introduction
Consistent health care access among Canadians, including prescription drugs, regardless of residence
Timely access to innovative therapies as they are “rolled out”, no matter the price tag
"It was a shock to me that I had to pay for cancer treatment. That's not how it's supposed to be in Canada."’— Julie Easley, Cancer Patient
'We cannot put a price tag on the health and well-being of any Canadian’— Ken Chan, VP at Cystic Fibrosis Canada
Prescription Drug Landscape: The Product
11
Introduction
2% of claimants Specialty Drugs account for 26.5% of costs
Source: Express Scripts Drug Trend Report , 2014 (Published 2015)
Prescription Drug Landscape: The Budget
12
Introduction
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) , National Health Expenditure 1975 to 2014
Product Listing Agreements
13
Introduction
Uncertainty exists surrounding the product’s: – New therapies for unmet needs; – Efficacy (heterogeneity); – Real world effectiveness; – Safety risks; – Cost-effectiveness; and – Budget impact.
A product listing agreement (PLA) is a contract negotiated between a pharmaceutical manufacturer and a drug benefit plan outlining specific conditions related to the drug plan’s reimbursement of a drug product.
Question 3
Has your company negotiated a product listing agreement with the pCPA?
a) Yes b) No
14
Introduction
Public Market
NIHB
Provinces /Territories
pCPA
Private Market
Private Payers (no formalized process
for PLA)
15
Current PLA Landscape Introduction
Innovative Drug Product
CDR: Common Drug Review pCODR: pan-Canadian Oncology Drug Review pCPA: pan-Canadian Drug Pharmaceutical Alliance
CDR/pCODR
Key Takeaways
Political change and uncertainty
Growing importance of specialty treatments
Political pressure to cover new treatments
Drug expenditures controlled temporarily
PLAs are here to stay
16
pan-Canadian Initiative
18
pCPA Updates
The pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) is pan Canadian initiative made up of most provincial/territorial (P/T) jurisdictions whom conduct joint negotiations for
brand name and generic drug products being considered for reimbursement in Canada through their respective public drug plans.
The pillar of the public PLA environment in Canada is the pCPA Created in 2010 Objectives for Brand Name Pharmaceuticals:
– Access – Consistency – Lower drug costs – Efficiency – Bargaining power
Objectives for Generic Pharmaceuticals: – Consistency – Lower drug costs
Question 4
Which of the following developments at the pCPA do you find to be most positive over the past few years?
a) Improved communication between pCPA and manufacturers b) A better understanding of the pCPA process c) Agreement by all parties that HTA recommendation forms the content
basis of agreement d) None of the above
19
pCPA Updates
pCPA 5 year Status
20
pCPA Updates
Activity Report (as of August 2015) 146 drugs considered 79 complete 22 ongoing Price reductions for 14 generics 27% of the Canadian generic market is priced at 18% to brand Process becoming more efficient
Source: Pharmaceutical Trends- Pubic Payer Perspective (Presented at CAHR Western Day October 2015, Kevin Wilson)
Question 5
Which of the following elements of the negotiation are the most challenging?
a) Adjustment to the BIA during negotiations b) Significant variance in timeliness of listing and lead province's
capacity/capabilities c) Difficulty negotiating an outcome-based agreement d) None of the above
21
pCPA Updates
pCPA Office
22
pCPA Updates
Pan Canadian Drugs Negotiations Report recommended create of a Secretariat
The Office supports pCPA work and provide expertise to support negotiation and performance monitoring – Proposed Mission: Driving collective
pCPA success through achievement of value-driven, effectively communicated and evaluated outcomes.
– Proposed Mandate: Providing leadership and operational excellence to participating public drug plans to collectively achieve the objectives of the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance
Source: pCPA Update- Industry Session Webinar (June 16, 2015)
Proposed pCPA Office Structure and Function
23
pCPA Updates
– Template standardization – Administrative support – Performance metric tracking – Multi-channel communications
Council of the Federation (Premiers)
Health Care Innovation Working Group
Conference of Deputy Ministers of Health
pCPA Executive Group (P/T Drug Program Senior Leads)
pCPA Steering Committee (Senior Executive Sub-Group)
P/T & Cancer Agency Staff
The Office of the pCPA
pCPA
Source: pCPA Update- Industry Session Webinar (June 16, 2015)
Update: pCPA Office Operational
24
pCPA Updates
S T A F F As per the pCPA October update, the Office is now operational...
• Senior Manager and Senior Negotiator in place • Recruitment still underway for 3 more individuals to complete the team
Imran Ali Title: Senior Manager ─ pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) Office Previous Experience: • Senior Manager ─ Agreements and
Negotiations Unit, Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care
• Ministry Co-Chair ─ Systems Management Committee , Ontario Medical Association
Update: pCPA Office Operational
25
pCPA Updates
S T A F F As per the pCPA October update, the Office is now operational...
• Senior Manager and Senior Negotiator in place • Recruitment still underway for 3 more individuals to complete the team
Anchalee Srisombun Title: Senior Negotiator ─ pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance (pCPA) Office Previous Experience: • Health Policy Advisor ─ Cystic Fibrosis Canada • Business Manager, Pricing and Supply ─ UK
Department of Health • Workforce Programme Officer, Allied Health
Professions ─UK Department of Health
Update: pCPA Office Operational
26
pCPA Updates
900 Bay Street Toronto, Ontario
M7A 1C2
L O C A T I O N
Next steps for the Office
I. Develop standardized guidelines, mandate, and structure II. Staffing and logistics III. Continued stakeholder engagement IV. Funding V. A phased approach for implementation
Impact: pCPA Office Operational
27
pCPA Updates
– Role of current HTA bodies NO change.
– Role of provinces with appointment of lead province NO change.
– The pCPA negotiation process CHANGE. – Single point of contact – Standardized process across jurisdictions – Increased Transparency
– Pre-negotiation evaluation by the Office *NEW *
Question 6
Please indicate the level of agreement with the following statement: “The creation of the new pCPA office will significantly improve the negotiation
process between the pCPA and manufacturers.”
a) Strongly agree b) Agree c) Neutral d) Disagree e) Strongly disagree
28
pCPA Updates
Québec versus Pan-Canadian
2nd largest market in Canada Largest net debt per capita ($23.2 thousand; 2014-2015) Lowest price provisions.
– Since the creation of the pCPA this has not been the case – QC is paying full list price for drugs – Significant foregone savings
29
Source: Canadian Institute for Health Information (CIHI) , National Health Expenditure Trends , 1975 to 2014 (Published 2014); RBC Canada, Canadian Federal and Provincial Fiscal Tables (published 2015) ; Government of Quebec Politique du medicament (2007)
pCPA Updates
Bill 28
Quebec Bill 28 receives Royal Assent on April 21, 2015
QC Health Minister (the Minister) can enter into a PLA with a manufacturer prior to having the drug added on the Liste des médicaments
Important Bill amendments: – Temporary exclusion
– Publication of INESSS recommendations
– Reporting on Impact by October 2017
30
pCPA Updates
Update: Québec joins pCPA
As per the pCPA October 16th update, QC has now joined pCPA...
• Brand and generic initiatives • Ongoing and completed negotiations
31
Quebec PLAs
Impact: Québec joins the pCPA
- New negotiations CHANGE o QC will participate and possibly lead
- Ongoing negotiations CHANGE o QC will be joining majority of ongoing
negotiations which have INESSS recommendations o Manufacturers will be notified
- Completed negotiations CHANGE o Process in place for jurisdictions wishing to become a
“new” party to a Letter Of Intent (LOI) o Consent of all original participating parties within the
LOI
32
pCPA Updates
Question 7
What impact do you believe the inclusion of Quebec into the pCPA process will have on listing performance (number of products and time to listing) in
Quebec?
a) Improve the performance (quicker listing of more products) b) Deteriorate the performance (slower listing of fewer products) c) Will not impact the performance
33
pCPA Updates
Outlook ─ pCPA Office Operational
34
pCPA Updates
Greater clarity, structure, and efficiency in the negotiation process
Better sense of timeline expectations and administration point of contact
Question: Will the Office will encourage more formal linkages/ cooperation between CADTH, PMPRB and the pCPA
Outlook ─ Québec joins pCPA
Listing previously rejected products
More private payer PLAs in QC
Increased access challenges
Question: Given the variance in how INESSS reviews products compared to CADTH, it remains to be seen how negotiations will occur when there is incongruence on clinical recommendations
35
pCPA Updates
Question 8
How likely do you think it is that private payers will be joining the pCPA?
a) Highly Likely b) Likely c) Neutral d) Unlikely e) Highly Unlikely
36
pCPA Updates
Private Payers in Canada
38
Private Payer PLAs
Starting to build internal competencies aimed at negotiating product listing agreements (PLAs)
Concerns about increasing drug costs, particularly for specialty products
Expressed interest in participating in pCPA negotiations
Need to better understand the prevalence, objectives and content of PLAs in this important market segment
Question 9
Has your company negotiated a product listing agreement with a private payer?
a) Yes b) No
39
Private Payer PLAs
Survey Objective
40
Private Payer PLAs
Pharma
Private Payers
• How many insurers and PBMs have experience with PLAs?
• Will PLAs become a requirement for coverage?
• What types of agreements are preferred?
• How many companies have experience with private payer PLAs?
• Why would companies seek to negotiate with insurers or PBMs?
• What types of agreements have been negotiated?
Private Payer PLA Series
42
Private Payer PLAs
Once closed, survey responses were analyzed and four summary reports were created and released to the public.
To obtain free copies of the Private Payer PLA Series please visit our website at pdci.ca.
Key Findings - Negotiation Leaders
Grow in importance over time. Private payers will likely pursue PLAs in a more organized and
aggressive manner Without any tangible threats to access, it may be up to private
payers to initiate discussions, similar to the lead taken by their provincial counterparts
Strong incentive amongst smaller private payers to negotiate collectively
Larger private payers will likely be able to negotiate more competitive agreements
43
Private Payer PLAs
Key Findings - Product Types
Non-specialty products, will likely be initiated by manufacturers seeking preferential listing over comparators
Specialty products, will likely be initiated by private payer as a precondition to listing
Questions - There remain intriguing questions about how drugs for rare diseases will be dealt with.
44
Private Payer PLAs
Question 10
What type of product(s) are you prepared to negotiate a private payer product listing agreement for?
a) Specialty product (e.g. Enbrel) b) Drug for rare disease (e.g. Kalydeco) c) Non-specialty product d) All of the above e) None of the above
45
Private Payer PLAs
Key Findings - Agreement Types
46
Private Payer PLAs
1
2
6
2
0%
25%
50%
75%
100%
Manufacturer Private Payer
Prop
ortio
n of
Res
pons
e Co
unts
Outcome Based Non-Outcome Based
Manufacturers Private Payers
Agreement types negotiated by negotiation experienced participants (manufacturers n=7 and private payers n=2)
Key Findings - Timing
47
Private Payer PLAs
0
1
2
3
4
5
Less than 1 month
1 to 3 months 4 to 6 months More than 6 months
Resp
onse
Cou
nts
Negotiation Length
Private Payers
Manufacturers
Negotiation length as per experienced participants (manufacturers n=7 and private payers n=2)
Key Findings - Challenges
Transparency - Learning from the US private market, payers may begin to request more open PLAs that present more obvious advantages (in value and transparency) to their employer clients and plan members
PE Expertise - Capacity for insurers to conduct/better understand pharmacoeconomic analyses of new products
Competition Bureau - Private payers need to examine any anti-competitive hurdles
48
Private Payer PLAs
Question 11
Do you believe confidentiality of private payer PLAs is a significant challenge for manufacturers?
a) Yesb) No
49
Private Payer PLAs
Outlook ─ Private Payer PLAs
50
PLAs as pre-condition of listing for (expensive) new specialty products.
If Manulife DrugWatch™ gains traction in the market, it’s only a matter of time before other large carriers develop competing offers.
Increased pressure to negotiate private payer PLAs in Quebec.
Private Payer PLAs
Question 12
Manulife recently released its DrugWatch Program™ aimed at providing greater scrutiny on specialty products. Do you believe that other major
carriers will follow Manulife’s lead and create similar programs?
a) Yes b) No
51
Private Payer PLAs
Outlook ─ Private Payer PLAs
52
Smaller sized private payers will likely look to work together to negotiate competitive agreements
Payers will need to resolve concerns about collusion and anti-competitive behaviour
Given that more stakeholders are involved in private payer PLAs increasing the risk of information spillage.
Private Payer PLAs
54
Thank you
Arvind Mani - Director, Market Access and Policy Research (613) 742-8225, Ext. 31 [email protected] Arvind Mani is the Director of Market Access and Policy Research at PDCI Market Access Inc. (PDCI), a leading Canadian pricing and reimbursement consultancy. Through his 20 years of experience working in consulting, associations (pharmaceutical and pharmacy) and industry, Arvind has developed an in-depth understanding of the Canadian and international pharmaceutical market access environment. At PDCI, he leads and provides strategic advice in the development of reimbursement submission dossiers that help clients demonstrate clinical- and cost-effectiveness to payers and health technology assessment agencies. Arvind has established expertise on emerging market access topics related to product listing agreements (PLAs), biosimilars, and drugs for rare diseases. He has published on a wide array of subjects ranging from companion diagnostics to healthcare reform. Arvind’s payer research project work has helped establish a solid relationship with both public and private payer stakeholders in Canada and allows him to offer clients strategic advice to help negotiate PLAs. Aside from facilitating advisory board meetings and conducting training sessions on topics related to the Canadian market access environment, he also presents/moderates sessions at market access conferences and academic institutions.