Upload
osborn-wilkins
View
217
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Market Analysis & Position Sizing(Both Equally Necessary)
=
We have a plethora of market analysis, selection and timing techniques…..but
We have no method, no framework, no paradigm, for the equally important, darknether-world of position sizing.
f = | Biggest Losing Outcome for 1 Unit | / f$
f$ = Account Equity / Units
Example: -$10,000 Biggest Losing Outcome, $50,000 Account, and I have on 200 shares, (2 units ):
f$ = 50,000 / 2 = 25,000
f = | -10,000 | / 25,000 = .4
Where:
Everyone, on Every Trade, on Every “Opportunity” Involving Risk,
has an f value (whether they acknowledge it or not):
(also f$ = | Biggest Losing Outcome for 1 Unit | / f
f$ and GHPR Invariant to Biggest Loss
BiggestLoss f f$ GHPR
–0.6 .15 4 1.125
–1 .25 4 1.125
–2 .5 4 1.125
–5 1.25 4 1.125
–29 7.25 4 1.125
The distribution can be made into bins. A scenario is a bin. It has a probability and An outcome (P/L)
f value example – 2:1 Coin Toss
• $10 stake• Worst Case Outcome -1• I’m wagering $5 (5 units)• f$ = 10 / 5 = 2 (one bet for every $2 in my
stake)• f =|-1| / 2 = .5• When biggest loss is manifest, we lose f%
of our stake – 50% in this case
The Mistaken Impression2:1 Coin Toss - 1 Play Expectation
0
0.25
0.5
0.75
1
1.25
1.5
1 50 99
Fraction of Stake (f)
Mu
ltip
le m
ade
on
Sta
ke
Multiple made on stake = 1 + ME/|BL| * f
(a.k.a Holding Period Return, “HPR”)
f after 40 plays
At .15 and .40, makes the same, but drawdown changesAt f=.1 and .4, makes the same,
But drawdown changes!
f after 40 plays
Beyond .5, even in thisvery favorable game, TWR (multiple) < 1,meaning you are losing money and will eventuallygo broke if you continue
f after 40 plays
Points of Inflection:Concave up to concave down. Up has gain growing faster than drawdown.(but these too migrate to the optimal point as the number of holding periods grows!)
Why The Leverage Space Model is Superior to Traditional (Modern Portfolio Theory) Models:
1. Risk is defined as drawdown, not variance in returns.
2. The fallacy and danger of correlation is eliminated.
3. Valid for any distributional form – fat tails are addressed.
4. The Leverage Space model is about leverage, which is not addressed in the traditional models.
Leverage has 2 Axes – 2 FacetsThe instant case of how much I amlevered up
How I progress myquantity with respectto time / equity changes
f
The fallacy and danger of correlation
• Fails when you are counting on it the most – at the (fat) tails of the distribution.
• Traditional models depend on correlation – Leverage Space model does not.
- cl/gc (all days) r=.18 (cl>3sd) r=.61 (cl<1sd) r=.09
- f/pfe (all days) r=.15 (sp>3sd) r=.75 (sp<1sd) r=.025
- c/msft (all days)r=.02 (gc>3sd) r=.24 (gc<1sd) r=.01
Why The Leverage Space Model is Superior to Traditional (Modern Portfolio Theory) Models:
1. Risk is defined as drawdown, not variance in returns.
2. The fallacy and danger of correlation is eliminated.
3. Valid for any distributional form – fat tails are addressed.
4. The Leverage Space model is about leverage, which is not addressed in the traditional models. (on both axes of “Leverage”)
http://parametricplanet.com/rvince/ScenariosExample.xls
Link for how to gather your data and create scenarios & probabilities:
MktSysA MktSysB MktSysCJan-07 $617.00 $2,812.00 $6,189.00Feb-07 $664.00 $3,260.00 $6,570.00Mar-07 $673.00 $3,560.00 $7,369.00Apr-08 $751.00 $3,360.00 $7,916.00
May-08 $887.00 $3,681.00 $8,199.00Jun-08 $849.00 $2,946.00 $8,256.00Jul-08 $781.00 $2,873.00 $8,573.00
Aug-08 $851.00 $2,899.00 $8,713.00Sep-08 $942.00 $2,947.00 $8,388.00Oct-08 $834.00 $3,069.00 $8,817.00Nov-08 $804.00 $2,994.00 $8,938.00Dec-08 $789.00 $2,787.00 $8,545.00Jan-08 $791.00 $2,817.00 $9,168.00Feb-08 $813.00 $3,086.00 $9,410.00
Here is the data I am using (this is from the link example from the previous slide) :
Date,Equity
Jan-07,617.00
Feb-07,664.00
Mar-07,673.00
Apr-07,751.00
May-07,887.00
Jun-07,849.00
Jul-07,781.00
Aug-07,851.00
Sep-07,942.00
Oct-07,834.00
Nov-07,804.00
Dec-07,789.00
Jan-08,791.00
Feb-08,813.00
• We have seen how position sizing is equally as important as market analysis, selection and timing.
• The Leverage Space Model is both a (Superior) Portfolio Model, but also a Paradigm for examining “Position Sizing.”
• With this paradigm, we need no longer operate in this dark nether-world, riddled with heuristics, misinformation, and essentially mere alchemy (e.g. 1% rules, “Half Kelly,” “Fixed Ratio,” “Modern Portfolio Theory”).
Market Analysis & Position Sizing(Both Equally Necessary)
=
We have a plethora of market analysis, selection and timing techniques…..but
We have no method, no framework, no paradigm, for the equally important, darknether-world of position sizing.