1
References 1 DaA ¨ niak L.B., Nikolaevskaia V.P., Polubutkin P.V. et al. (1977) Use of long-wave ultraviolet radiation in the treatment of vaso- motor rhinitis. Vestn. Otorinolaringol. 3, 48–52 2 Keme ´ny L. & Koreck A. (2007) Ultraviolet light phototherapy for allergic rhinitis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 87, 58–65 3 Cingi C., Yaz A., Cakli H. et al. (2009) The effects of phototherapy on quality of life in allergic rhinitis cases. Eur. Arch. Otorhino- laryngol. 266, 1903–1908 4 Garaczi E., Boros-Gyevi M., Bella Z. et al. (2011) Intranasal phototherapy is more effective than fexofenadine hydrochloride in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a pilot study. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 474–477 5 Cingi C., Cakli H., Yaz A. et al. (2010) Phototherapy for allergic rhinitis: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo- controlled study. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 4, 209–213 6 Bella Z., Kadocsa E., Keme ´ny L. et al. (2010) Narrow-band UVB phototherapy of nasal polyps: results of a pilot study. J. Photo- chem. Photobiol. B 100, 123–127 Masking made easy: a picture does speak a thousand words 3 October 2011 Sir, Candidates undertaking ENT professional examinations often find it difficult to understand audiological masking (personal experience: http://www.enttzar.co.uk). We have therefore developed a simple tool (Fig. 1) to address this problem and feel that your readers may also find it help- ful when determining whether masking is required. Important notes 1 Masking is necessary to overcome the problem of cross-hearing and involves temporarily elevating the hear- ing threshold of the non-test ear by a known amount of noise, so that an accurate assessment of the test ear threshold can be made. 2 Masking always involves a noise given through air con- duction (never through bone conduction). 3 Each rule of masking applies independently at each frequency on an audiogram. 4 When rule 2 is invoked, the bone conduction threshold needs to be masked as opposed to rules 1 and 3 when the air conduction threshold in the better ear is masked. 5 Figure 1 is based on the air-conducted signal being delivered through a standard supra- or circum-aural earphone rather than inserting earphone (inter-aural attenuation for the latter is 55 dB). Conflict of interest None to declare. Persaud, R.A.P.* & Upile, T. * ENT Departments, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK, and  Chase Farm Hospital, London, UK. E-mail: [email protected] CORRESPONDENCE: LETTERS O X RIGHT LEFT 2 10 dB difference 40 dB difference 40 dB difference 3 1 Fig. 1. A simple and effective tool that illustrates the three rules (1, 2 & 3) when masking is needed (each arrow points to the test ear, O unmasked air conduction right ear, X unmasked air conduction left ear, D unmasked bone conduction – relevant to both ears because of the 0 dB inter-aural attenuation). Correspondence 591 Ó 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd Clinical Otolaryngology 36, 588–598

Masking made easy: a picture does speak a thousand words

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

References

1 DaAniak L.B., Nikolaevskaia V.P., Polubutkin P.V. et al. (1977)

Use of long-wave ultraviolet radiation in the treatment of vaso-

motor rhinitis. Vestn. Otorinolaringol. 3, 48–52

2 Kemeny L. & Koreck A. (2007) Ultraviolet light phototherapy for

allergic rhinitis. J. Photochem. Photobiol. B 87, 58–65

3 Cingi C., Yaz A., Cakli H. et al. (2009) The effects of phototherapy

on quality of life in allergic rhinitis cases. Eur. Arch. Otorhino-

laryngol. 266, 1903–1908

4 Garaczi E., Boros-Gyevi M., Bella Z. et al. (2011) Intranasal

phototherapy is more effective than fexofenadine hydrochloride

in the treatment of seasonal allergic rhinitis: results of a pilot

study. Photochem. Photobiol. 87, 474–477

5 Cingi C., Cakli H., Yaz A. et al. (2010) Phototherapy for allergic

rhinitis: a prospective, randomized, single-blind, placebo-

controlled study. Ther. Adv. Respir. Dis. 4, 209–213

6 Bella Z., Kadocsa E., Kemeny L. et al. (2010) Narrow-band UVB

phototherapy of nasal polyps: results of a pilot study. J. Photo-

chem. Photobiol. B 100, 123–127

Masking made easy: a picture does speak a thousand words

3 October 2011

Sir,

Candidates undertaking ENT professional examinations

often find it difficult to understand audiological masking

(personal experience: http://www.enttzar.co.uk). We have

therefore developed a simple tool (Fig. 1) to address this

problem and feel that your readers may also find it help-

ful when determining whether masking is required.

Important notes

1 Masking is necessary to overcome the problem of

cross-hearing and involves temporarily elevating the hear-

ing threshold of the non-test ear by a known amount of

noise, so that an accurate assessment of the test ear

threshold can be made.

2 Masking always involves a noise given through air con-

duction (never through bone conduction).

3 Each rule of masking applies independently at each

frequency on an audiogram.

4 When rule 2 is invoked, the bone conduction

threshold needs to be masked as opposed to rules 1 and

3 when the air conduction threshold in the better ear is

masked.

5 Figure 1 is based on the air-conducted signal being

delivered through a standard supra- or circum-aural

earphone rather than inserting earphone (inter-aural

attenuation for the latter is 55 dB).

Conflict of interest

None to declare.

Persaud, R.A.P.* & Upile, T.�*ENT Departments, St Mary’s Hospital, London, UK, and

�Chase Farm Hospital, London, UK.

E-mail: [email protected]

CO

RR

ES

PO

ND

EN

CE

:L

ET

TE

RS

O X

RIGHT LEFT

2

≥10 dB difference ≥40 dB difference

≥40 dB difference

3

1

Fig. 1. A simple and effective tool that illustrates the three rules

(1, 2 & 3) when masking is needed (each arrow points to the

test ear, O unmasked air conduction right ear, X unmasked air

conduction left ear, D unmasked bone conduction – relevant to

both ears because of the 0 dB inter-aural attenuation).

Correspondence 591

� 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd • Clinical Otolaryngology 36, 588–598