Upload
akaspers
View
367
Download
3
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Master Research Presentation
Automated Measurement of Brain Volume in Patients after aneurysmal
Subarachnoid HemorrhageAnne Kaspers
source: socialmediaseo.net
Contents
• Introduction• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results• Discussion
• Classification issues
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion• Questions
Introduction
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
• What is aSAH?
• After aSAH: brain damage
source: thestrokefoundation.comsource: socialmediaseo.net
Introduction
• Annual incidence: 6 - 16 cases per 100,000
• Fatality rate: 50 percent
• 50 percent of the survivors suffer from neurological or
cognitive deficits after a year
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Introduction
• Purpose: mapping brain volume
• A new routine is needed
• for accurate brain volume measurement for 3 T MR
images
• for cerebral abnormalities
• The routine is based on kNN using manually segmented
MR image training data
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Data
• Axial T1-weighted and T2-weighted images from a aSAH
study 1.
• 10 training and 12 validation scans of patients after aSAH
and control participants
• Exclusion of patients with claustrophobia, neurosurgical
clips, pacemaker, younger than 18 years
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
1 Schaafsma JD et al. (2010) Intracranial aneurysms treated with coil placement: test characteristics of follow-up MR angiography--multicenter study. Radiology 1:209-218
Methods - Routine
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
T1 and T2 weighted image
Input images
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
Registered T1 weighted imageand T2 weighted image
Registration
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
Create mask to- include brain tissue- exclude skull and fatty tissue
Mask Creation
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
Image of 10 clusters
Perform k-means
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
Selection of clusters and mask
Create Mask
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
Mask of the cerebrum on the T2 weigthed image
Remove Cerebellum
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
Extracted Brain in the T1 and T2 weighted image
Extract Brain Images
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
T2 weighted image with and without shading
Shading Correction
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
kNN Classification
Methods - Routine
• Training data
• 10 full segmentations
• Subcortical structures, cortical grey matter,
peripheral CSF and lateral ventricles
• Only voxels without partial volume effect
No partial volume effect
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• A sample consist of a location, intensities and a label• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
T1 T2
y
xz
x
y
zx
Methods - Routine
• What is feature space?
Inte
nsity
Location
Sample of Structure 1 Sample of Structure 2
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• How does k-Nearest Neigbor (kNN) work?
Inte
nsity
Location
Sample of Structure 1 Sample of Structure 2 New Sample
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• How does k-Nearest Neigbor (kNN) work?
Inte
nsity
Location
Sample of Structure 1 Sample of Structure 2 New Sample
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• How does k-Nearest Neigbor (kNN) work?
Inte
nsity
Location
Sample of Structure 1 Sample of Structure 2 New Sample
k = 1
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• How does k-Nearest Neigbor (kNN) work?
Inte
nsity
Location
Sample of Structure 1 Sample of Structure 2 New Sample
k = 1
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• How does k-Nearest Neigbor (kNN) work?
Inte
nsity
Location
Sample of Structure 1 Sample of Structure 2 New Sample
k = 3
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• How does k-Nearest Neigbor (kNN) work?
Inte
nsity
Location
Sample of Structure 1 Sample of Structure 2 New Sample
k = 3
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Methods - Routine
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Remove Edge for subcortical structures and cortical grey matter
Methods - Routine
Move back CSF from lateral ventricles
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Lateral ventricles before and after transfer CSF
Methods - Routine
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Remove Infarcts
Methods - Routine
Final result
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Method - Evaluation
• Validation by 2 observers
• Half slices selected throughout the brain
T2 weighted image, Subcortical structures, Cortical grey matter, Peripheral CSF and Lateral ventricles
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Method - Evaluation
• Manual fraction combines information of multiple
observers and multiple structures
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
T2 weighted image, Subcortical structures, Cortical grey matter, Peripheral CSF and Lateral ventricles
Method - Evaluation
• Inter-observer agreement
Observer segmentations
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Method - Evaluation
• Routine validation
Observer segmentations
Routine segmentations
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Method - Evaluation
• Measuring agreement using:
• Fractional Similarity Index (fSI)
• Sensitivity and Specificity
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Results
• Inter-observer agreement• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Results
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
• Inter-observer agreement good for most structures
(fSI > 0.80)
Results
• Routine validation results• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Results
• Routine agreement good for subcortical structures, lateral
ventricles, total brain and intracranial volume
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Results
• Routine agreement good for subcortical structures, lateral
ventricles, total brain and intracranial volume
• Cortical grey matter, peripheral and total CSF fSI scores
lower
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Discussion – Classification issues
• Low scores of cortical grey matter because of :
• Slice thickness larger than structure thickness
• Unclear border
• Perivascular spaces
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Discussion – Classification issues
• Low scores of peripheral CSF because of
• Slice thickness larger than structure thickness
• Under-segmentation in training data
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Discussion – Strength and limitations
• Strength:
• fSI could better deal with probabilities
• Limitation:
• fractional observer values limited
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Conclusion
• Automated routine is accurate for lateral ventricles,
total brain and intracranial volume
• It could be used for volume measurements in patients
after aSAH
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Acknowledgments
ISI
Nelly AnbeekJeroen de BresserHugo KuijfMax ViergeverKoen Vincken
Neurology
Geert Jan BiesselsGabriël RinkelJoanna Schaafsma
Others
Marja van AkenEkke KaspersBart Waalewijn
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions
Questions
• Introduction
• Methods
• Data
• Routine
• Evaluation
• Results
• Discussion
• Classification
• Strength and limitations
• Conclusion
• Questions