MATANUSKA SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY … · 6/22/2016 · Resolution. Staff (Jessica Smith) will draft an updated resolution, referencing the past TAB resolutions, requesting

MATANUSKA SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD

Chair – David Lundin Vice Chair – Beth Fread David Wilson Daniel Elliot Don Carney Sonya Larkey-Walden Cindy Bettine Lance Wilson John Moosey/MSB Representative

Clerk: VACANT Staff: Jessica Smith, MSB Transportation Planner

AGENDA

REGULAR MEETING June 22, 2016 DSJ BUILDING ASSEMBLY CHAMBERS 2:00PM – 4:30PM I. CALL TO ORDER; ROLL CALL

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA; PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

III. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

1. May 25, 2016

IV. AUDIENCE INTRODUCTION

V. STAFF/AGENCY/BOARD REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS A. ADOT&PF B. Matanuska Susitna Borough

1. Staff (Jessica Smith) 2. Boards & Commissions

a) Parks, Recreation & Trails Advisory Board (PRTAB) b) Road Service Areas (RSAs) c) Aviation Advisory Board (AAB)

C. Mat-Su Transit Coalition (David Wilson) D. Cities

1. Houston (Lance Wilson) 2. Palmer 3. Wasilla (Bill Klebesadel)

VI. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION (3 minutes per person)

VII. ITEMS OF BUSINESS

A. Capital Improvement Program (Sara Jansen, MSB Planner)

1. New Priority Order Information

2. CIP Policy

3. Resolution 16-03, recommending priority projects for the National

Highway System, Transportation Planning, Alaska Highway System,

Community Transportation Program, and Transit in the Borough

Capital Improvement Program for fiscal years 2018 – 2023.

B. Resolution 16-02, supporting planning efforts to develop a regional

Transportation Planning Partnership (Referral from Assembly).

C. Resolution 16-04, recommending the designation of an Off-Road Vehicle

(ORV) Task Force to explore solutions to the ORV challenges in the

Matanuska-Susitna Borough.

D. Collector Roads (Beth Fread)

VIII. MEMBER COMMENTS

IX. NEXT MEETING(S)

A. TAB Regular Meeting – July 27, 2016, 2:00PM – 4:30PM

1. Agenda Items

X. ADJOURNMENT

MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH REGULAR MEETING MINUTES TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD MAY 25, 2016 The regular meeting of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) was held on May 25, 2016, at the Matanuska Susitna Borough Assembly Chambers, 350 E. Dahlia Avenue, Palmer, Alaska. The meeting was called to order at 2:21 p.m. by Mr. Lundin, Chair. I. CALL TO ORDER, ROLL CALL, AND DETERMINATION OF QUORUM TAB members present and establishing a quorum were:

Mr. David Lundin Ms. Beth Fread Mr. Daniel Elliott Ms. Sonya Larkey-Walden (arrived 2:21 p.m.) Mr. Lance Wilson

TAB members absent and excused were:

Mr. Don Carney, MSB School District Ms. Cindy Bettine, Transportation Industry Mr. David Wilson, At-Large Staff in Attendance:

Ms. Jessica Smith, Transportation Planner II Ms. Josi Willcox, TAB Clerk

II. APPROVAL OF AGENDA

MOTION: Ms. Larkey-Walden moved to approve the agenda. The motion was seconded

by Mr. L. Wilson. MOTION: Ms. Fread moved to amend the agenda by adding “Audience Introductions” to

future agendas following “Approval of Minutes”, and to move “Audience Participation” to immediately follow “Staff/Agency/Board Reports & Presentations.” The motion was seconded by Ms. Larkey-Walden.

There was no objection noted. VOTE: The May 25, 2016 agenda was approved as amended. III. PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE

The Pledge of Allegiance was led by Ms. Fread.

IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES

A. Minutes 1. April 27, 2016 MOTION: Ms. Larkey-Walden moved to approve the April 27, 2016 minutes. The

motion was seconded by Mr. Elliott. Mr. Elliott requested his Road Service Areas report be amended to read, “crack sealing had begun and that weight restrictions should be off this week but will remain in areas further out where temperatures are still colder.” VOTE: The regular meeting minutes were approved as amended. V. AUDIENCE INTRODUCTIONS Mr. George Hays, Assistant Borough Manager Ms. Eileen Probasco, Planning Department Director Mr. David Post, DOT&PF Planning Manager Ms. Melanie Nichols, DOT&PF Mat-Su Area Planner Mr. Allen Kemplen, DOT&PF Mat-Su Area Planner VI. STAFF/AGENCY/BOARD REPORTS & PRESENTATIONS A. Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (Ms. Melanie Nichols, Mr.

Allen Kemplen, Mr. David Post)

Ms. Nichols informed the Board on the steps to sign up for GovDelivery in order to receive updates on projects. Mr. Kemplen spoke to the project status supplemental handout. Mr. Post and Mr. Kemplen answered questions regarding the State Transportation Improvement Program.

B. Matanuska Susitna Borough 1. Staff (Ms. Jessica Smith) Ms. Smith gave updates on Capital Projects and Planning Projects. Ms. Smith introduced a map of Capital Projects. She also answered questions posed by the Board regarding specific aspects of the Capital Projects list. Ms. Probasco added that the Assembly is currently working on a bond to go on the ballot for recreation projects and that the TAB should keep that in mind when thinking about projects and funding. 2. Boards and Commissions

a) Parks, Recreation, and Trails Advisory Board (PRTAB) (Ms. Sonya Larkey-Walden) Ms. Larkey-Walden gave a brief report on the most recent meeting of the PRTAB. b) Road Service Areas (RSAs) (Mr. Daniel Elliott) Mr. Elliott reported that weight restrictions were off except for extreme higher elevations. He also stated that often projects are delayed because utilities need to be addressed, and that MTA has an extra crew working to alleviate the issue. The RSA had a discussion regarding ATV damage to roads and the cost of repairs, and spending RSA funds on uncertified roads. c) Aviation Advisory Board (AAB) (Mr. David Lundin) Mr. Lundin stated there was no meeting of the AAB since the last TAB meeting, so there was nothing to report. C. Mat-Su Transit Coalition (No representative available.) D. Cities 1. City of Houston (Mr. Lance Wilson) Mr. Wilson reported the City of Houston’s Comprehensive Plan draft is now on line. He stated the Comp Plan schedule may get pushed back a bit to allow for a greater comment period. 2. City of Palmer (No representative available.) 3. City of Wasilla (No representative available.) VII. AUDIENCE PARTICIPATION

The following person spoke regarding concerns with the public process: Mr. Eugene Carl Haberman.

VIII. ITEMS OF BUSINESS 1. Off-Road Vehicle Subcommittee (Ms. Sonya Larkey-Walden) Ms. Sonya Larkey-Walden provided a brief history of the ORV work that has been completed to date. She noted that there are new members on both the PRTAB and TAB boards. She requested that information be provided to both Boards in paper form. George Hays, Deputy Borough Manager, suggested the TAB put together a resolution suggesting the Assembly put together a task force/subcommittee to discuss the ORV issues. The Board discussed how to move forward. Consensus was reached that a task force or subcommittee to discuss ORV challenges in the MSB could be requested through a Resolution. Staff (Jessica Smith) will draft an updated resolution, referencing the past TAB resolutions, requesting the Assembly designate a task force/subcommittee to discuss the issues. The updated resolution will be added to the June 22, 2016 TAB Meeting Agenda for discussion and review. 2. Transportation Planning Partnership Program (Referral from Assembly) Ms. Smith provided a brief overview of the purpose of a Transportation Planning Partnership, referencing the memorandum to the TAB and local municipalities’ resolutions of support in the packet. Mr. David Post (DOT&PF) spoke to DOT&PF Planning staff’s support of a transportation planning partnership and how the current project development and planning process would benefit from the partnership. A hand out detailing current levels of public involvement from planning to construction of a project was distributed and presented.

3. Resolution 16-02, Transportation Planning Partnership Motion: To postpone action to time certain, at the June 22, 2016 TAB Meeting (Fread, Larkey-Walden). Discussion: The Board discussed the possibility of voting to adopt the resolution, rather than simply tabling the resolution. This would allow further discussion on the actual resolution, including any board member amendments or questions, but could still delay action to the next regular meeting. Staff confirmed that the referral would be due back to the Assembly by August 15th. Vote: Yes (Larkey-Walden, Elliott, Fread), No (Lundin, L. Wilson). The motion failed. Motion: To approve TAB Resolution 16-02, Transportation Planning Partnership (L. Wilson, Fread).

Discussion: Ms. Fread brought forward the following proposed amendments A, B, and C to Resolution 16-02:

A. Revise wording and order of the “key opportunities” to read: • Advance shared decision making; • Ensure community and stakeholder involvement; • Improve connectivity throughout the region; • Ensure maintenance budgets meet infrastructure needs; • Emphasize regional planning and coordination; • Link land use and transportation planning efforts; and • Collaborate to fund projects.

B. Amend the conceptual partnership process to have a new step 6 inserted with current steps 6 and 7 being renumbered to 7 and 8 as appropriate. The new step 6 would read, “Once a solution is identified that solution shall be presented to the impacted community(ies) for their consideration and acceptance.”

C. Recommend to the Planning Department that Transportation Planning Partnership brochure be revised to reflect these changes in the Resolution.

Motion: To postpone any further action on this meeting to the June 22, 2016 TAB Meeting (L. Wilson, Fread).

Vote: None opposed. The motion passes.

IX. CORRESPONDENCE & INFORMATION

A. 2016 1st Quarter ARRC Newsletter – Community Ties

B. DOT&PF STIP – Mat Su Projects

C. TAB Agenda Planner – Updated

D. TAB Schedule – Updated

X. NEXT MEETING

A. TAB CIP Workshop - June 8, 2016, 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.

Location: DSJ Building, Lower Level Conference Room

B. Regular Meeting – June 22, 2016, 2:00 p.m. – 4:00 p.m.

Location: DSJ Building, Assembly Chambers

XI. MEMBER COMMENTS

• Ms. Beth Fread stated her appreciation for the public involvement hand out from

DOT&PF. She noted that her proposed amendment to Resolution 16-02 lands

between right-of-way and authority to proceed in the process. Ms. Fread also

voiced her appreciation for DOT&PF bringing project-specific information.

• Mr. Daniel Elliott reminded Anchorage, Palmer and all of Europe do not have an

ORV problem in the right-of-way, because it is not allowed.

• Ms. Sonya Larkey-Walden: None.

• Mr. Lance Wilson: None.

• Mr. David Lundin: None.

XII. ADJOURNMENT The regular meeting adjourned at 4:13 p.m. Mr. David Lundin, Chair Date ATTEST: Jessica Smith, Transportation Planner Date Staff Support

1 | P a g e J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 6

Included in this packet

Is information about the revised priority order of these CIP Sections:

• N a t i o n a l H i g h w a y S y s t e m

• T r a n s p o r t a t i o n P l a n n i n g

• A l a s k a H i g h w a y S y s t e m

• C o m m u n i t y T r a n s p o r t a t i o n S y s t e m

• T r a n s i t T i m e d i d n o t a l l o w f o r a c o m p l e t e r e - o r g a n i z a t i o n o f t h e p r o j e c t d e s c r i p t i o n s b e f o r e t h e c l o s e o f b u s i n e s s F r i d a y , a n d I ( S a r a ) w i l l b e o u t o f t h e o f f i c e t h e w e e k o f J u n e 1 3 . I w a n t e d t o g e t t h i s i n f o r m a t i o n a b o u t p r i o r i t y p r o j e c t s t o y o u i n t h e n o r m a l m e e t i n g p a c k e t . T h e f e w m o d i f i e d d e s c r i p t i o n s , a n d n e w n o m i n a t i o n s f o r t h e M P O a n d t h e B o g a r d / S e l d o n / G r u m a n i n t e r s e c t i o n w i l l b e a v a i l a b l e a t t h e J u n e 2 2 T A B m e e t i n g .

2 | P a g e J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 6

FY2018-2023 MSB CIP Transportation Sections

National Highway System

Project Order at Work Session

1. Parks Highway Wasilla Alternative Corridor - Advance ROW Acquisition (CIP #8)

2. Interchange for Port MacKenzie Crossing (CIP #57)

3. Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - MP .3-6.8, Centaur to Vine (CIP #54)

Parks Highway - Lucus Road to Big Lake Improvements - MP 43.5-52.3 (CIP #55)

4. Glenn Highway - Erosion at MP 49 (CIP #11)

5. Glenn Highway - Erosion Protection - MP 66.6-92 (CIP #120)

6. Palmer-Wasilla Highway Eastern Terminus (CIP #52)

7. Glenn Highway - Parks to Arctic Renovation, 4 Lane - MP 34-42 (CIP #10)

8. Glenn Highway - Rehabilitation - King River to Cascade - MP 66.5-92 (CIP #12)

Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - Vine to Settler’s Bay (CIP #19)

9. Glenn Highway - Moose Creek Canyon Reconstruction - MP 53-56 (CIP #13)

10. Palmer-Wasilla Highway Center Turn Lane Widening (CIP #155)

Project Order Post Work Session


2. Parks Highway - Lucus Road to Big Lake Improvements - MP 43.5-52.3 (CIP #55)


4. Glenn Highway - Rehabilitation - King River to Cascade - MP 66.5-92 (CIP #12)




8. Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - MP .3-6.8, Centaur to Vine (CIP #54)




Parks Highway - Lucus Road to Big Lake Improvements - MP 43.5-52.3 (CIP #55)

12. Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - Vine to Settler’s Bay (CIP #19)

3 | P a g e J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 6

Priority Lists are limited to ten items and by splitting the projects that are tied, twelve projects are now on the list. The Board Can:

a) Drop the last two projects onto a needs list b) Recombine the tied projects for a list that looks like this:

Project Order Post Work Session (Revised)


2. Tie - Parks Highway - Lucus Road to Big Lake Improvements - MP 43.5-52.3 (CIP #55)

Tie - Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - MP .3-6.8, Centaur to Vine (CIP #54)


4. Tie - Glenn Highway - Rehabilitation - King River to Cascade - MP 66.5-92 (CIP #12)

Tie - Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - Vine to Settler’s Bay (CIP #19)







4 | P a g e J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 6

Transportation Planning


1. Commuter Rail Corridor and Station Pre-Development Planning (CIP #299)

2. Big Lake Community Impact Assessment - Port to Parks Route, Phase 2, EIS (CIP #160)

3. Parks Highway - Willow Bypass Study (CIP #9)

4. Inter-Governmental Comprehensive Inter-Modal Transportation Plan (CIP #156)

5. Port to Parks Highway at Houston (CIP #253)

6. Regional Transportation Planning Organization (CIP #286)


1. Metropolitan Planning Organization (CIP #XXX)

2. Tie - Big Lake Community Impact Assessment - Port to Parks Route, Phase 2, EIS (CIP #160)

Tie - Port to Parks Highway at Houston (CIP #253)

3. Parks Highway - Willow Bypass Study (CIP #9)

4. Commuter Rail Corridor and Station Pre-Development Planning (CIP #299)

5. Inter-Governmental Comprehensive Inter-Modal Transportation Plan (CIP #156)

5 | P a g e J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 6

Community Transportation System

• The Board asked the staff to bring forward a nomination for Bogard/Seldon/Grumann intersection for consideration as a top ten priority project. That nomination is being written and the description will be available at the June 22 TAB Board meeting.

• The Board asked if it was possible to combine Trunk Road Phase I and Phase II projects into a

single project. Capital Projects Director Jude Bilifer explained that is not possible as the Phase 1 project is for the round-a-bout currently underway and access roads. Phase II is for the railroad bridge. The project dollar amounts looked adequate to him, and he noted the projects attracted two different types of funding sources.

• The Board requested clarification about the route for Seldon Road Extension – Phase 2. Mr.

Bilifer noted the description does not say it follows Beverly Lake Road all the way, and that the dollar amount was adequate. The description has been modified to reflect the new dates and clarifies the route.

• David Post, DOT’s planning manager for the south-central region confirmed there is $5.7 Million

programmed in the current STIP for the ROW phase of the Wasilla Main-Street Couplet. When the state issues the next STIP, it is anticipated that $27 million in federal dollars will be available. The City of Wasilla will cover undergrounding of utilities desired by the City.

• The Museum Drive Extension is a Borough project with a stated funding need of $4 million. Mr.

Bilafer indicated that funding appeared correct to him. • The priority list was not changed at the workshop.

6 | P a g e J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 6

Transit Projects


1. Replacement Share-A-Ride Vans for Mat-Su (CIP #267)

2. Wasilla Transit Center Commuter Rail Dock and Staging Facility Upgrade (CIP #256)

3. Meadow Lakes Community Mascot Stops (CIP #124)

4. Old and New Glenn Highway Intersection Park and Ride Facility (CIP #268)

5. Regional Transit Maintenance Center (CIP #273)

6. Regional Transit Dispatch & Scheduling Center (CIP #274)


1. Replacement Share-A-Ride Vans for Mat-Su (CIP #267)

2. Meadow Lakes Community Mascot Stops (CIP #124)

3. Old and New Glenn Highway Intersection Park and Ride Facility (CIP #268)

4. Regional Transit Maintenance Center (CIP #273)

5. Regional Transit Dispatch & Scheduling Center (CIP #274)

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Resolution Serial No. 16-03 Transportation Advisory Board Page 1 of 4

MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD RESOLUTION SERIAL NO. 16-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDING PRIORITY PROJECTS FOR THE NATIONAL HIGHWAY SYSTEM, TRANSPORTATION PLANNING, ALASKA HIGHWAY SYSTEM, COMMUNITY TRANSPORTATION PROGRAM, AND TRANSIT IN THE BOROUGH CAPITAL IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM FOR FISCAL YEARS 2018 – 2023.

WHEREAS, the Transportation Advisory Board (“TAB”) reviewed the

projects nominated for inclusion in the FY 2018 - 2023 Capital

Improvement Program; and

WHEREAS, the TAB recognizes the importance of long range

planning for development in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough

(“Borough”); and

WHEREAS, the projects nominated in the National Highway

System, Transportation Planning, Alaska Highway System,

Community Transportation Program, the Community Transportation

Rail, and Transit sections address transportation requirements

of the Borough to meet the needs of a growing populace and

business community; and

WHEREAS, staff reviewed the projects against the

evaluation criteria established for all nominations to the

Capital Improvement Program to create a prioritized list; and

WHEREAS, the TAB reviewed the prioritized list of

nominations for inclusion in the Capital Improvement Program.


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Matanuska-Susitna

Borough Transportation Advisory Board respectfully recommends the

prioritized list of transportation-related projects as identified in

Attachment A for inclusion in the FY 2018-2023 Capital Improvement

Program.

ADOPTED by the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Transportation Advisory

Board on this ____ day of ______, 2016.

_______________________________ David Lundin, CHAIR

ATTEST: Jessica Smith, Transportation Planner Staff Support


MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH

TRANSPORTATION ADVSIORY BOARD

RESOLUTION 16-03

ATTACHMENT A

PRIORITIZED LIST

2018 – 2023 Capital Improvement Program

National Highway System

1. Glenn Highway - Erosion at MP 49

2. Tie - Parks Highway - Lucus Road to Big Lake Improvements - MP

43.5-52.3

Tie - Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - MP .3-6.8,

Centaur to Vine

3. Glenn Highway - Erosion Protection - MP 66.6-92

4. Tie - Glenn Highway - Rehabilitation - King River to Cascade - MP

66.5-92

Tie - Knik-Goose Bay Road Reconstruction, 4 Lane - Vine to

Settler’s Bay

5. Glenn Highway - Parks to Arctic Renovation, 4 Lane - MP 34-42

6. Palmer-Wasilla Highway Eastern Terminus

7. Palmer-Wasilla Highway Center Turn Lane Widening

8. Glenn Highway - Moose Creek Canyon Reconstruction - MP 53-56

9. Parks Highway Wasilla Alternative Corridor - Advance ROW

Acquisition

10. Interchange for Port MacKenzie Crossing

Transportation Planning Projects

1. Metropolitan Planning Organization

2. Tie - Big Lake Community Impact Assessment - Port to Parks Route,

Phase 2, EIS


Tie - Port to Parks Highway at Houston

3. Parks Highway - Willow Bypass Study

4. Commuter Rail Corridor and Station Pre-Development Planning

5. Inter-Governmental Comprehensive Inter-Modal Transportation Plan

Alaska Highway System

1. Big Lake Intersection Improvements

2. Point MacKenzie Road Upgrade - Knik-Goose Bay to Burma Road

Community Transportation Program

1. MSB School Access Transportation Bond - 2013

2. Seward Meridian Parkway Extension North - Phase 2

3. MSB Substandard Road Improvements

4. Museum Drive Extension (Parks Highway Connector)

5. Fish Passage

6. South Trunk Road Extension – Phase 1

7. South Trunk Road Extension – Phase 2

8. Seldon Road Extension - Phase 2

9. Wasilla-Fishhook Road - Main Street One-Way Couplet

10. Wasilla-Fishhook Road Upgrade, Seldon Road to Palmer-Fishhook

Road

Community Transportation Rail Project

1. Port MacKenzie Rail Extension

Transit Projects

1. Replacement Share-A-Ride Vans for Mat-Su

2. Meadow Lakes Community Mascot Stops

3. Old and New Glenn Highway Intersection Park and Ride Facility

4. Regional Transit Maintenance Center

5. Regional Transit Dispatch & Scheduling Center

Providing Outstanding Borough Services to the Matanuska-Susitna Community

MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH Planning and Land Use Department 350 East Dahlia Avenue Palmer, AK 99645 Phone (907) 861-8501 Fax (907) 861-7876

www.matsugov.us [email protected]

MEMORANDUM TO: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) FROM: Jessica Smith, MSB Transportation Planner SUBJECT: Transportation Planning Partnership Program Referral from MSB Assembly DATE: June 22, 2016 Enclosed in the Transportation Advisory Board June 22, 2016 Meeting Packet is a referral from the May 17, 2016 MSB Assembly meeting addressing the proposed Transportation Planning Partnership Program (TPPP). This referral item includes an Informational Memorandum, a flyer that outlines the general concept of the TPPP, Resolutions of Support from the Cities of Palmer, Wasilla, and Houston, and a draft resolution for the Assembly. The program has not yet been developed. Staff is seeking TAB support for the overall concept of the TPPP before moving forward with development of the program. Staff will continue to seek input from MSB Assembly, Planning Commission, and Advisory Board(s) throughout the development of the program. Following the May 25, 2016 MSB TAB Meeting, the Board postponed action on Resolution 16-02 to the June 22, 2016 TAB meeting. Included in the June 22, 2016 TAB meeting packet is TAB Resolution 16-02, including proposed amendments by TAB Member Beth Fread, for the Board’s consideration. Enclosed: Proposed Amendments to TAB Resolution 16-02 (B. Fread) Assembly Referral Packet

• Informational Memorandum 16-109 • Transportation Planning Partnership Brochure • Houston City Council Resolution No. 16-01 • Palmer City Council Resolution No. 16-010 • Palmer Planning & Zoning Commission Resolution No. 16-001 • Wasilla City Council Resolution No. 16-04 • Wasilla Planning Commission Resolution No. 16-03 • Draft MSB Assembly Resolution No. 16-047

Draft TAB Resolution No. 16-02

http://www.matsugov.us/


mailto:[email protected]


Proposed Amendments to TAB Resolution 16-02 TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PARTNERSHIP PROGRAM Proposed by TAB Member Beth Fread, 5-25-2016

1. Revise wording and order of the “key opportunities” to read:

• Advance shared decision making; • Ensure community and stakeholder involvement; • Improve connectivity throughout the region; • Ensure maintenance budgets meet infrastructure needs; • Emphasize regional planning and coordination; • Link land use and transportation planning efforts; and • Collaborate to fund projects.

Rationale – Community involvement NOT Public involvement: during the NTI training all of the break-out session worksheets contained the item Community involvement. The term community involvement has a very different meaning than public involvement. A community is a specific type of public and the general public would refer to all of the citizenry who are private and not public members of all of the communities.

2. Amend the conceptual partnership process to have a new step 6 inserted with current steps 6 and 7 being renumbered to 7 and 8 as appropriate. The new step 6 would read, “Once a solution is identified that solution shall be presented to the impacted community(ies) for their consideration and acceptance.”

Rationale – Community consideration and acceptance: first and foremost the DOT&PF, per state statute, must present transportation planning efforts to impacted communities as well as work with the cities in accomplishing transportation planning. Next, several projects outside the cities, and within the MSB as a whole, have had just as much delay and respective negative project cost impacts as those within the cities. Since this is a consideration within the Resolution, all of the negative impacts should be considered with the TAB resolution.

3. Recommend to the Planning Department that Transportation Planning Partnership brochure be revised to reflect these changes in the Resolution.

REFERRAL FROM MSB ASSEMBLY

Resolution 16-047 IM 16-109

Referred to Planning Commission & Transportation Advisory Board for 90 days

Due: August 15, 2016

PARTNERSHIP CASE STUDIES

TRIP 97 Central Oregon TRIP97 is a collaborative multi-agency effort focused on developing a long-term framework for the improvement and maintenance of the US 97 corridor. It is a study of a concept to change the paradigm of how they plan and fund US 97 related improvements and investments.

US 12 CORRIDOR Chehalis WA The Chehalis tribe paid to have a study done on a WSDOT, US Highway. In addition to the Tribe and DOT partner, the two counties within which the corridor spanned were also engaged. It was a unique partnership that led to shared, commonly supported solutions.

KUNA DOWNTOWN CORRIDOR PLAN Kuna, IDCorridor planning project that had a lot of cross-agency collaboration (mainly between the City and County). The project won an Excellence in Transportation Award, partially based on the amount of agency collaboration. "In the eight years I’ve been with city council, I haven’t seen that kind of involvement with the taxpayers. I am very happy that we have leadership at ACHD that seeks more input for the cities and for the taxpayers." said Kuna City Council President, Richard Cardoza.

WHAT’S IN OUR TOOLBOXIMPROVEMENTS COME INMANY SHAPES AND SIZES.HERE'S HOW... • Maintenance

• Transit improvements• Rail improvements• Bike/Ped improvements • Local street connections • Emergency management • Signal timing

• Traffic demand management• Economic impact evaluations• Safety enhancements • Traveler information • Intersection improvements • Road widening• Cradle to cradle projects

TRANSPORTATIONPLANNINGPARTNERSHIP

WORKING TOGETHER TO MAKE THE BEST TRANSPORTATION INVESTMENT DECISIONS

1During the project scope

development, the partnership process is initiated

2Get official buy-In —

signed inter-governmental agreement with all parties

defining areas of responsibility 3Partnership works

through agreed strategy during life

cycle of project

4Partnership defines the

problem & outlines public involvement strategy

5Partnership develops

performance measures to address partnership goals6

Develop toolbox of strategies for project

designers that can be implemented to meet

the performance measures

7Partnership develops funding

& implementation strategy that utilizes partner resources

to advance project

8Partnership remains engaged as the project

advances through design & construction so that the performance measures are met.

SOLUTIONPARTNERSHIP

ROADMAP

PROBLEMProject Identified by

transportation stakeholders

CLARIFICATIONCommunity clarifies the

problem and determines the design is not compatible with

local expectations.

DESIGNDOT designs the project

PUBLIC INVOLVEMENT

DOT does the required levelof public involvement

during the design phase

SOLUTIONDOT identifies solutions and defines the project priority

WHAT'S HAPPENINGRIGHT NOW...

WHY THISIS NOT

OPTIMALWaste of Time and Money

Loss of Public TrustBurnt Out Staff

Expended Political Capital

WE NEEDA BETTER WAY

TO DEFINEAND SOLVE

THE PROBLEMSOF OUR

TRANSPORTATIONSYSTEM!

PERFORMANCEMEASURES

THAT ADDRESS A BROAD RANGEOF PARTNERSHIP GOALS

TravelOptions

Environment

Maintenance Redundancy

EconomyMobility

Safety

Accessibility

WHY A PARTNERSHIPAPPROACH MAKES SENSECost Effective and Time Saving

Operate with a Shared Vision

Each Partner Brings Something

Pooling of Resources

Vested Interest for Success

Protect Investment

Advance Mutual Interests

Amplify Success

Collaborative Problem Solving

Allows for Range of Investments

Page 1 of 2 IM 16-012

City of Palmer Information Memorandum No. 16-012

Resolution No. 16-010 Subject: Resolution No. 16-010: Supporting Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning Efforts to Develop a Regional Transportation Planning Partnership Process Agenda of: February 23, 2016 Council Action: ___________________________________________________

Originator Information:

Originator: Planning and Zoning Commission

Date: 01/21/16 Requested agenda date: 02/23/16

Department Information:

Route to: Department Director:

Signature: Date:

X Community Development 02/01/16

X Finance 02/01/2016

Public Safety

Public Works

Attachment(s): Resolution No. 16-010 Planning and Zoning Resolution No. 16-001 Minutes from January 21, 2016 Planning and Zoning meeting – Draft Copy

Approved for presentation by:

Signature: Remarks:

City Manager

City Attorney

City Clerk

Certification of Funds:

Total amount of funds listed in this legislation: $

This legislation (√): Has no fiscal impact Creates a positive impact in the amount of: $

Negative impact in the amount of: $

Funds are (√): Budgeted Line item(s): Not budgeted Affected line item(s):

General fund assigned balance (after requested budget modification): $

Enterprise unrestricted net position (after requested budget modification): $

Director of Finance Signature:

jbower

Text Box

Adopted

Page 2 of 2 IM 16-012

Summary statement: Resolution No. 16-010 will support the planning efforts of the Matanuska-Susitna Borough in developing a Regional Transportation Planning Partnership Process to encourage better communication and collaboration efforts between the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities, the Borough and the Cities of Palmer, Wasilla and Houston. Background: In 2014, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough hosted a Regional Transportation Planning Workshop which was attended by representatives from the Matanuska-Susitna Borough, City of Palmer, City of Wasilla, City of Houston and State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities. The week long workshop was specifically designed to focus discussion topics on addressing the challenges, opportunities and issues facing Borough-wide transportation planning and ways to encourage better communication and collaboration between the Borough, the Cities and SOA DOT&PF. Resolution No. 16-010 is one step in implementing projects and strategies identified in the report and action plan developed from the workshop. Administration recommendation: Adopt Resolution No. 16-010.

______________________________________________________________________________________________ City of Palmer, Alaska Resolution No. 16-010 Page 1 of 3

Introduced by: City Manager Wallace

Date: February 23, 2016 Action: Adopted

Vote: Unanimous Yes: No: Best

LaFrance Carrington

Combs DeVries Hanson Johnson

CITY OF PALMER, ALASKA

Resolution No. 16-010

A Resolution of the Palmer City Council Supporting Matanuska-Susitna Borough Planning Efforts to Develop a Regional Transportation Planning Partnership Process

WHEREAS, over the last decade there have been several road projects within the Matanuska-Susitna Borough that have been postponed or delayed due to communication and/or collaboration issues between the State of Alaska Department of Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF), the Matanuska-Susitna Borough (Borough), and the cities of Palmer, Wasilla and Houston (Cities);

WHEREAS, these delays and postponements have come at significant costs in terms of

project budgets, public trust, safety, and political support; WHEREAS, the borough, the cities, and DOT&PF hosted a Regional Transportation Planning

Workshop in 2014 to specifically address the challenges, opportunities and issues facing regional transportation planning and to encourage better communication and collaboration; and

WHEREAS, workshop participants identified seven key opportunities for regional

transportation planning improvements: • Link Land Use and Transportation Planning Efforts • Emphasize Regional Planning and Coordination • Improve Connectivity Across the Region • Ensure Maintenance Budgets Meet Infrastructure Needs • Collaborate to Fund Projects • Advance Shared Decision-Making • Encourage Stakeholder and Public Involvement

WHEREAS, since 2014 the borough, cities, and DOT&PF have been working to implement

projects and strategies identified in the report and action plan developed from the workshop; WHEREAS, identified in the workshop report and action plan, the borough, cities, and

DOT&PF applied jointly for a Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER) grant in 2014 and developed a self-assessment report in 2015 to understand and prepare for the region’s future designation as a Metropolitan Planning Organization;


WHEREAS, the DOT&PF awarded a grant in the amount of one million dollars to the Mat-

Su Borough in 2015 to continue current efforts in regional transportation planning; WHEREAS, of the several projects identified for funding by the DOT&PF grant, the

development of a Regional Transportation Planning Partnership Process (partnership process) was included;

WHEREAS, the development of the partnership process was highlighted in the report and

action plan and will help to address each of the improvement opportunities identified by workshop participants;

WHEREAS, communication and cooperation is critical to the development and

implementation of the partnership process; WHEREAS, before completely developing the process, the borough is seeking support for

the overall concept and a willingness to participate in the development of the partnership process; WHEREAS, the partnership process is intended to create a proactive management approach

to change the paradigm of how the borough, cities and partner agencies plan for, manage and fund transportation improvements;

WHEREAS, the concept behind the partnership process would: 1) Begin before design on

any major project that meets mutually agreed upon criteria. 2) A formal agreement is drafted and agreed upon by all parties outlining the governance structure for managing the project. 3) Together, the partnership defines the problem and outlines the public involvement strategy. 4) Once the problem is defined, the partnership drafts performance measures and project goals to evaluate their decisions and track their progress. 5) The partnership is involved in strategizing solutions and developing funding/implementation plans. Partners share resources to advance the identified strategies and solutions. 6) The partnership is not disbanded when the project enters the design phase; it follows the project providing oversight and ensuring the goals and performance measures are being met. 7) The partnership continues to evaluate the project after construction and through the life cycle of the transportation facility;

WHEREAS, the partnership would create an opportunity for improved regional governance

over major transportation projects by allowing the pooling of resources, collaborative problem solving, and prioritized investments. The combination of these elements brings the region an improved ability to operate with a shared vision, saves time and money, regains the public trust, empowers staff to make the right decisions, and builds positive political capital; and

WHEREAS, the State of Alaska Department of Transportation & Public Facilities (DOT&PF)

is obligated by 23 CFR450.210(b) to have a documented process for consulting non-metropolitan local officials for both the Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP) and the Statewide Transportation Plan (SLRTP).

NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, the Palmer City Council supports the Matanuska-Susitna Borough planning efforts to develop a regional transportation planning partnership process.


Passed and approved by the City Council of the City of Palmer, Alaska this twenty-third day of Feburary, 2016.

DeLena Goodwin Johnson, Mayor

Janette M. Bower, MMC, City Clerk

TAB Resolution 16-02 Page 1 of 5 Adopted:

Action:


TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD RESOLUTION NO. 16-02 A RESOLUTION OF THE MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD SUPPORTING PLANNING EFFORTS TO DEVELOP A REGIONAL TRANSPORTATION PLANNING PARTNERSHIP PROCESS TO ENSURE BETTER COMMUNICATION AND COLLABORATION BETWEEN THE ALASKA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION AND PUBLIC FACILITIES, THE BOROUGH, AND THE CITIES OF PALMER, WASILLA, AND HOUSTON.

WHEREAS, over the last decade there have been several

transportation projects within the Matanuska-Susitna Borough

that have been postponed or delayed due to communication and/or

collaboration issues between the Alaska Department of

Transportation and Public Facilities (DOT&PF) and the Matanuska-

Susitna Borough (Borough); and

WHEREAS, these delays and postponements have come at

significant costs in terms of project budgets, public trust,

safety, and political support; and

WHEREAS, the Borough, the cities of Palmer, Wasilla, and

Houston (cities), and DOT&PF hosted a Regional Transportation

Planning Workshop (workshop) in 2014 to specifically address the

challenges, opportunities and issues facing regional

transportation planning and to encourage the better

communication and collaboration; and


WHEREAS, workshop participants identified seven key

opportunities for regional transportation planning improvements:

• Link Land Use and Transportation Planning Efforts

• Emphasize Regional Planning and Coordination

• Improve Connectivity Across the Region

• Ensure Maintenance Budgets Meet Infrastructure Needs

• Collaborate to Fund Projects

• Advance Shared Decision-Making

• Encourage Stakeholder and Public Involvement; and

WHEREAS, since 2014 the borough, cities, and DOT&PF have

been working to implement projects and strategies identified in

the report and action plan developed from the workshop; and

WHEREAS, identified in the workshop report and action plan,

the borough, cities, and DOT&PF applied jointly for a

Transportation Investment Generating Economic Recovery (TIGER)

grant in 2014 and developed a self-assessment report in 2015 to

understand and prepare for the region’s future designation as a

Metropolitan Planning Organization; and

WHEREAS, the DOT&PF awarded a grant in the amount of one

million dollars to the Mat-Su Borough in 2015 to continue

current efforts in regional transportation planning; and

WHEREAS, of the several projects identified for funding by

the DOT&PF grant, the development of a Regional Transportation


Planning Partnership Process (partnership process) was included;

and

WHEREAS, the development of the partnership process was

highlighted in the report and action plan and will help to

address each of the improvement opportunities identified by

workshop participants; and

WHEREAS, communication and cooperation is critical to the

development and implementation of the partnership process; and

WHEREAS, before completely developing the process, staff is

seeking support for the overall concept and a willingness to

participate in the development of the partnership process; and

WHEREAS, the partnership process is intended to create a

proactive management approach to change the paradigm of how the

borough, cities and partner agencies plan for, manage and fund

transportation improvements; and

WHEREAS, the conceptual partnership process would work as

such: 1) It would begin before design on any major project that

meets a mutually agreed upon criteria. 2) A formal agreement is

drafted and agreed upon by all parties outlining the governance

structure for managing the project. 3) Together the partnership

defines the problem and outlines the public involvement

strategy. 4) Once the problem is defined, the partnership drafts

performance measures and project goals to evaluate their

decisions and track their progress. 5) The partnership is


involved in strategizing solutions and developing

funding/implementation plans. Partners share resources to

advance the identified strategies and solutions. 6) The

partnership is not disbanded when the project enters the design

phase; it follows the project providing oversight and ensuring

the goals and performance measures are being met. 7) The

partnership continues to evaluate its success after construction

and through that life cycle of the transportation facility; and

WHEREAS, the partnership would create an opportunity for

improved regional governance over major transportation projects

by allowing the pooling of resources, collaborative problem

solving, and prioritized investments. The combination of these

elements brings the region an improved ability to operate with a

shared vision, save time and money, regain the public trust,

empower staff to make the right decisions, and build positive

political capital; and

WHEREAS, the State of Alaska Department of Transportation &

Public Facilities (DOT&PF) is obligated by 23 CFR450.210(b) to

have a documented process for consulting non-metropolitan local

officials for both the Statewide Transportation Improvement

Program (STIP) and the Statewide Transportation Plan (SLRTP).


NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Matanuska-Susitna

Borough Transportation Advisory Board hereby supports planning

efforts to develop a regional transportation planning

partnership program to ensure better communication and

collaboration between the Alaska Department of Transportation

and Public Facilities, the Borough and the Cities of Palmer,

Wasilla and Houston.

ADOPTED by the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Transportation

Advisory Board this ___ day of ___, 2016.

DAVID LUNDIN, Chair

ATTEST

Jessica Smith, Transportation Planner Staff Support

YES:

NO:




MEMORANDUM TO: Matanuska-Susitna Borough Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) FROM: Jessica Smith, MSB Transportation Planner SUBJECT: Draft TAB Resolution 16-04 Off-Road Vehicles (ORV) Task Force DATE: June 22, 2016 Enclosed in the Transportation Advisory Board June 22, 2016 Meeting Packet is the drafted TAB Resolution 16-04, per the Board’s request at the May 25, 2016 TAB meeting. The drafted resolution is an effort to request a formal designation of an off-road vehicle (ORV) task force to explore solutions to the ORV challenges in the Matanuska-Susitna Borough. The past TAB resolutions referencing off-road vehicle and/or all-terrain vehicle issues as defined by discussion at TAB meetings since 2006 are as follows:

• October 25, 2006. TAB Resolution 06-10 recommended reserving trail space for multiple uses.

• March 25, 2009. TAB Resolution 09-01 recommends designating program funding for evaluating the use of ATVs in the highway corridors and that DOT&PF provide matching planning funds.

• February 22, 2012. TAB Resolution 12-03 recommends the Assembly provide program funds for evaluation of ATV use and impacts within highway corridors.

• August 22, 2012. TAB Resolution 12-12 supports funding for a study of off road vehicle use in the MSB ROW.

ORV/ATV conversations continue at the September 17, 2014 TAB ORV Work Session with participation from the Borough Manager, Assistant Manager, and Attorney. The Board requests that staff draft a resolution to send to the Planning Commission recommending the Mayor, Manager, and the Assembly form an ORV Blue Ribbon Task Force to take on this task. At the January 21, 2015 meeting, the Task Force concept is revisited by the Board. Four (4) board members volunteer to be considered for this Task Force. In March 2015, Debbie sends a memo to the Borough Clerk asking how to start a Blue Ribbon Task Force.








On December 16, 2015, an ORV TAB Work Session was held. The Board suggests discussing the creation of an educational booklet/flyer/brochure outlining current laws for ATVs at their next meeting. At the May 25, 2016 TAB Meeting, the Board requests staff review past TAB resolutions regarding ATVs/ORVs and draft a new resolution requesting a ORV Task Force be designated. The drafted resolution (TAB Resolution 16-04) is included in the June 22, 2016 TAB Meeting packet. Enclosed TAB Resolution 06-10 TAB Resolution 09-02 TAB Resolution 12-03 TAB Resolution 12-12 Draft TAB Resolution 16-04






TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD

RESOLUTION 12-03

A RESOLUTION OF THE MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION

ADVISORY BOARD RECOMMENDING ASSEMBLY PROVIDE PROGRAM FUNDS FOR

EVALUATION OF ATV USE AND IMPACTS WITHIN HIGHWAY CORRIDORS.

WHEREAS, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough has the highest

concentration of ATV/Snowmobile use in the state of Alaska; and

WHEREAS, nearly every borough road and state highway

corridor in the Borough has unofficial ATV/Snowmobile paths

within the ROW; and

WHEREAS, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough has the highest

percent of ATV/Snowmobile injuries requiring hospitalization;

and

WHEREAS, the Alaska DOT&PF Statewide Highway Safety Plan

points out that ATV/Snowmobile safety issues need to be

addressed; and

WHEREAS, ATV use within the road and highway ROW have

impacts to the road embankment and pavement edge that cause

maintenance costs to rise; and

WHEREAS, there is a need for ATV/Snowmobile use planning,

improvements and management along road corridors in the

Matanuska-Susitna Borough; and

WHEREAS, this planning effort should address natural and

man-made obstacles including design of the highways and

pedestrian pathways which often force ATV/Snowmobile use onto

paved surfaces and embankment shoulders increasing the chance of

collisions and damage to the road embankments.


Borough Transportation Advisory Board respectfully recommends

the Assembly provide program funds for evaluation of

ATV/Snowmobile use and impacts within highway corridors.

Page 1 of 2 Transportation Advisory Board Resolution Serial No. 12-03


Advisory Board this 3^ day of February, 2012.

Ken walch, Chair

ATTEST:

Debbie Passmore, Administrative Secretary



TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD

RESOLUTION SERIAL NO. 12-12

A RESOLUTION OF THE MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION

ADVISORY BOARD SUPPORTING FUNDING FOR A STUDY OF OFF ROADVEHICLE USE IN THE MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH RIGHT OF WAY

WHEREAS, there has been no substantive data gathered

regarding Off Road Vehicle (ORV) use in the Matanuska-Susitna

Borough right of way; and

WHEREAS, there has been no substantive compilation of State

and local laws regarding ORV use in the Matanuska-Susitna

Borough right of way; and

WHEREAS, ORV user groups have not been approached to

provide detailed information regarding ORV use in the Matanuska-

Susitna Borough right of way; and

WHEREAS, the Matanuska-Susitna Borough Maintenance Division

has not been approached to provide detailed information

regarding ORV impacts to Matanuska-Susitna Borough roads, rightof way and transportation infrastructure.


Borough Transportation Advisory Board recommends and advises the

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Assembly that the attached Scope ofWork be funded to address the issues above and providerecommendations.

ADOPTED by the Matanuska-Susitna Borough TransportationAdvisory Board this 22nd day of August, 2012.

/^//?aA^Ken^Walch, Chair

Pago l of 2 Transportation Advisory Board Resolution Serial No. 12-12

ATTEST:

"]lMij YaA^rf^O—Debbie Passmore, Administrative Secretary


OFF ROAD VEHICLES

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS

Scope of Work

Research and compile existing Alaskan and other similar states' documentation and policies regarding

use and enforcement of ORVs in public road ROWs, including accident reports. ($5K)

Summarize history of local and state laws pertaining to the use of ORVs in public road ROWs. ($2K)

Collect current ORV use data: number, type, speed, age of users, location within ROW ($20K)

Map ORV use in combination with population density ($1K)

Conduct interviews with MSB O&Mstaff regarding ORV impacts to public roadways ($1K)

Conduct interviews with local ORV user groups to assess: ($20K)

• safety concerns

• use patterns, destinations

• awareness of, and solutions to, ORV impacts to public roadways (dust, erosion of shoulder,

speeding through neighborhoods, headlight glare to oncoming traffic, personal propertydamage, etc.)

• if there are current local educational ORV programs

Summarize ORV impacts to public road ROW and costs to the MSB ($2K)

Recommend further steps for implementation of MSB road ROW policy regarding ORV use. ($5K)

Total $56K


MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD RESOLUTION SERIAL NO. 16-04

A RESOLUTION OF THE MATANUSKA SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY BOARD (TAB) RECOMMENDS THE DESIGNATION OF AN OFF-ROAD VEHICLE (ORV) TASK FORCE TO EXPLORE SOLUTIONS TO THE ORV CHALLENGES IN THE MATANUSKA-SUSITNA BOROUGH.

WHEREAS, on March 25, 2009 and February 22, 2012, the

Matanuska Susitna Borough Transportation Advisory Board (TAB)

adopted Resolution No. 09-02, recommending the Assembly provide

program funds for evaluation of all-terrain vehicle (ATV) use

and impacts within highway corridors; and

WHEREAS, on August 22, 2012, the Matanuska Susitna Borough

TAB adopted Resolution No. 12-12, supporting funding for a study

of off-road vehicle (ORV) use in the MSB right-of-way; and

WHEREAS, the TAB has continued conversations related to ORV

activities including safety concerns, impacts on current

infrastructure and right-of-way maintenance, impacts to air

quality, and need for public education on these subjects; and

WHEREAS, the TAB recognizes the issues associated with ORVs

in the MSB need to be resolved through support of the Assembly

and with an appropriate public process.


Borough Transportation Advisory Board (TAB) recommends the

Matanuska-Susitna Borough Assembly designation of an Off-Road

Vehicle (ORV) Task Force to explore solutions to the ORV

challenges in the Matanuska-Susitna borough.


Advisory Board this _____ day of __________, 2016.

_________________________________ David Lundin, Chair

ATTEST:

_________________________________ Jessica Smith, MSB Transportation Planner/Staff Support

Documents

MATANUSKA SUSITNA BOROUGH TRANSPORTATION ADVISORY … · 6/22/2016 · Resolution. Staff (Jessica Smith) will draft an updated resolution, referencing the past TAB resolutions, requesting