Math 3100- Scribe for 9-16-09

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 8/14/2019 Math 3100- Scribe for 9-16-09

    1/3

    Math 3100

    Scribe for 9/16/09

    A few clarifications before we begin

    When denote something is unique we use an exclamation point. (For example: ! reads thereexists a uniqueline )

    Because can mean length of the segment we will denote a segment as AB. Left and right does not have meaning in relations to lines, because lines can be drawn vertically.

    To determine where points lie on the line we can reference the betweenness axioms.

    AB = { } is a set with one element therefore it is incorrect to use this notation. We can only talk about points that are not incident with the line as being on one side or

    another of that line .

    When we claim that point Q is an element of then we claim that is a set although it is not.

    B-4 For every line and for any three points A, B, and C not lying on :

    (i) If A and B are on the same side of and B and C are on the same side of , then A and Care on the same side of .

    Explanation: Points A, B and C were perceived to be on the same side of , which was

    represented by a drawing. To confirm that our drawing was correct we will reference

    Definition 2.1, which states that points A and B are on the same side of because segment

    AB does not contain any points on . Similarly, points B and C are on the same side of

    because segment BC does not contain any points on . From the definition as well as the

    axiom, we conclude that points A and C are on the same side of .

    (ii) If A and B are on opposite sides of and B and C are on opposite sides of , then A and Care on the same side of .

    Explanation: Point A was perceived to be on the opposite side of as points B and C, which

    was represented by a drawing. To confirm that our drawing was correct we will reference to

    Definition 2.1, which states that points A and B are on opposite sides of if the segment AB

    does contain a point on . Similarly, points B and C are on opposite sides of because

    segment BC does contain a point on . From the definition as well as the axiom, we

    conclude that points A and C are on the same side of .

    Proposition 2.2 For any two distinct points A, B the following holds:

    (i) AB = BABy I-1, for two distinct points A, B as given, there ! line .

    By B-2, given two distinct points A and B there exist points C, D, and E lying on such that

    C*A*B and A*D*B and A*B*E.

  • 8/14/2019 Math 3100- Scribe for 9-16-09

    2/3

    By B-1, A, D, and B are distinct points all lying on the same line such that A*D*B and B*D*A.

    By definition of a segment, AB = {D: A*D*B} U {A,B} = {D: B*D*A} U {B, A} =BA. We can claim

    that AB = BA by axiom B-1. Q.E.D.

    Note: Segment AB is essentially a collection of points, therefore another proof of

    Proposition 2.2 (i) can be shown by AB BA and BA AB.

    (ii) AB (a proper subset)A definition of a ray is necessary to prove Proposition 2.2 (ii).

    Definition of a ray was first proposed to be = {C: A*B*C} U {D: A*C*B} U {A}. However,

    point B was not accounted for in this definition and another definition was proposed which

    included the definition of a segment which accounted for point B, the following definition is

    the definition we will use for a ray.

    Definition of a ray: = {C: A*B*C} U AB

    Proof: AB by definition of .

    To confirm that AB we can confirm that {C: A*B*C} by B-2.

    Proposition 2.3 For any two distinct points A, B the following holds:

    (i) = ABExplanation: If we construct ray AB and BA the intersection of the two rays is what

    the two rays have in common which is segment AB.

    (ii) U =Explanation: If we construct ray AB and BA the union of the two rays will be all ofray AB and all of ray BA which is .

    Lemma 2.4 Points A and B are on the same side of iff side (A, ) = side (B, ).

    Note: side (A, ) can be read as The side A is on in relation to . To prove the lemma we will

    need to prove both possible cases because if and only if (iff) is explicitly stated.

    **Proof will need to be completed for Monday September 21st, however, a few ideas for the

    proof were presented.**

    side (A, ) = {P: P and A are on the same side of } side (B, ) = {P: P and B are on the same side of } Proof in one direction: If A, B are on the same side of side of then side (A, ) = side (B,). Proof in the other direction: If side (A, ) = side (B, ) then A and B are on the same side of .

    Proposition 2.5 Every line has exactly two sides and they are disjoint.

  • 8/14/2019 Math 3100- Scribe for 9-16-09

    3/3

    By B-2, there exist two distinct points A, C and we can determine that there is also a point B such that

    A*B*C. If a line is drawn through point B we can claim that by Definition 2.1 as well as Lemma 2.4 that

    side (A, ) side (C, ).

    If we select an additional distinct point Q, if AQ then Q is on the opposite side of A. Or if AQ does not

    intersect , then Q is on the same side of A. By B-4, we can determine that Q and C are on the same sideof .

    Lemma 2.6 If A*B*C and is any line passing through C that is distinct from line AC, then A and B are

    on the same side of .

    Given A*B*C, is any line passing through C.

    By B-1, A*B*C and C*B*A where A, B and C are three distinct points lying on the same line .

    By Proposition 1.2 line AC and have a unique point, C, in common.

    Definition 2.1 implies that AB does not intersect line therefore A and B are on the same side of .