Upload
others
View
1
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Maximizing benefits from ‘biodiscovery’: a Coastal State resource providers perspective
John N.A. Hooper, Queensland Museum & Natural Products Discovery Griffith University, Brisbane
Research State (user of the marine genetic resources (MGRs) for biodiscovery purposes)
Coastal State (provider of MGRs to a Research State)
Biodiscovery (= bioprospecting, and in this instance, refers only to marine natural products discovery)
Some definitions …
An Australian perspective from a Queensland experience
• Enabling environment: How does a Coastal State attract a Research State to use their MGRs ?
o the ‘stick’: regulatory protocols, policy & legislation
o the ‘carrot’: access to MGRs in Australia & Queensland
• Experiences in major biodiscovery collections
• Research State benefits: an example of a successful biodiscovery partnership
• Coastal State benefits: ‘environmental data’ from collections for bioregional planning, new biological, genetic and chemical data, taxonomic capacity building, etc
The (dis)enabling biodiscovery environment: •Myriad of Laws governing biodiscovery: E.g.
o Forestry Acto Land Acto Nature Conservation Acto Fisheries Acto (State) Marine Parks Acto Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Acto Native Title Acto Wet Tropics World Heritage Protection and Management Act o Etc.
‘Biodiscovery’ regulatory framework pre-2004
‘Biodiscovery’ regulatory framework pre-2004The (dis)enabling biodiscovery environment: Myriad of Laws:• Many access permits from many agencies: E.g. o Marine Parks collections Permit, The Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Regulations 1983 (Commonwealth)o EPA Collections Permit, Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland Parks & Wildlife Service, Marine Parks Regulations 1990 (Queensland)o DPI General Fisheries collections Permit, Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries, Queensland Fisheries Act, 1994o Museum Licence, Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland Parks & Wildlife Service, s170f Nature Conservation Regulation 1994.o Permit to ‘Take, Use, Keep or Interfere with Cultural or Natural Resources (Scientific Purpose)’,Environmental Protection Agency, Queensland Parks & Wildlife Service, S9(1)(A) Nature Conservation (Administration) Regulation 2006.o Commercial wildlife harvest licence under the Nature Conservation Act 1992o DNR Sales permit under the Forestry Act 1959 to remove materialo Commercial wildlife licence under the Nature Conservation Act 1992 to use the material.
‘Biodiscovery’ regulatory framework pre-2004The (dis)enabling biodiscovery environment: Myriad of Laws: • Many access permits from many agencies:• Lack of clarity:
o ownership of MGRso right of access
o rights to commercialisation, IP, etc from use of MGRs
‘Biodiscovery’ regulatory framework pre-2004The (dis)enabling biodiscovery environment: Myriad of Laws: • Many access permits from many agencies:• Lack of clarity:• Potentially ecologically unsound and unsustainable collection activities:
o few, if any, environmental benefitso research effort uncoordinatedo new knowledge not in public domain
‘Biodiscovery’ regulatory framework pre-2004The (dis)enabling biodiscovery environment:Myriad of Laws: • Many access permits from many agencies:• Lack of clarity:• Potentially ecologically unsound and unsustainable collection activities:• Little or no investment in Coastal State R&D:
o mostly offshore commercialisation & value-addingo little or no investment in infrastructure, capacity building, compound
librarieso no contribution to Coastal State voucher specimen collections
(environmental knowledge)
‘Biodiscovery’ regulatory framework pre-20042002: Bonn Guidelines adopted by the CBD to
provided extra guidance on ABS2002: Nationally Consistent Approach agreed by all
states, territories and Commonwealth of Australia
2004: Queensland 1st state to implement nationally consistent approach (CBD + Bonn Guidelines) = ‘Queensland Biodiscovery Act 2004’
Post 2004: 2 other Australian jurisdictions have new legislation; 4 others currently developing policy
• (http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/ACTS/2004/04AC019.pdf)
The enabling environment: Purpose of the Act: Purpose of the Act: 1. Regulatory: provide certainty for all stakeholders by establishing
a streamlined and clear legislative framework to regulate collection and use of all Queensland’s native biological materials from lands and waters;
The ‘stick’: Queensland Biodiscovery Act 2004
Tools:Biological Collection Authority (BCA):• single permit issued minimising duplication of
regulation; • regulated by a set of Codes (ethics,
collection standards, minimising environmental damage etc)
• (http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/ACTS/2004/04AC019.pdf)
The enabling environment: Purpose of the Act:Purpose of the Act:2. 2. Co-investment: encourage investment in the Queensland’s
biodiscovery research and development sector;3. 3. Commercialisation: ensure fair and equitable benefit sharing
from biodiscovery to Queensland;
The ‘stick’: Queensland Biodiscovery Act 2004
Tools:Benefit Sharing Agreement (BSA):i.e. royalties, investment into Queensland's biotechnology industry, collaboration with researchers, development of new or improved products, obligation to lodge voucher samples in museums/ herbaria
• (http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/ACTS/2004/04AC019.pdf)
The enabling environment: Purpose of the Act:Purpose of the Act:4. 4. Environmental: enhance knowledge of Queensland’s biodiversity,
promoting conservation and ecologically sustainable use of native biological resources.
The ‘stick’: Queensland Biodiscovery Act 2004
Tools:Biodiscovery Plan:developed by Research State in line with the Codes (e.g. source and scope of biological material, collection access, timetable & localities, proposed commercial outcomes, environmental data and other non-monetary benefits etc.)
• (http://www.legislation.qld.gov.au/LEGISLTN/ACTS/2004/04AC019.pdf)
The enabling environment: Purpose of the Act:Purpose of the Act:4. 4. Environmental: enhance knowledge of Queensland’s biodiversity,
promoting conservation and ecologically sustainable use of native biological resources.
The ‘stick’: Queensland Biodiscovery Act 2004
Non-monetary benefits:‘environmental data’ arguably as valuable as any potential monetary benefits from commercialisation.
• BigBig (70,000km continental coastline, 8.6 million km2 continental marine territory; 16.1 million km2 oceanic jurisdiction);
• DiverseDiverse (60 marine bioregions, all 5 oceanic climatic zones, tropics to polar, intertidal to the abyssal plains)
• Highly UniqueHighly Unique (1 of the 19 ‘megadiverse’ countries, huge proportion of endemic biota,Gondwanan origins & subsequent mixing with the Tethyan biota)
The ‘carrot’: Australian Marine Genetic Resources (MGRs)
17 of Australia’s 60
marine bioregions
5 of Australia’s 13
world heritage-listed sites (including
the Great Barrier Reef WHA, Great
Sandy Region –Fraser Island)
GBR Qld Plateau
emergent reefs = Coral Sea territories
NE seamounts
Gulf Carpentaria
Great Sandy Region
The ‘carrot’: Queensland MGRs
Sponges: significant scientific progress over past 2 decades, and most number of new compounds discovered from biodiscovery
(Data from US (Data from US National Cancer National Cancer Institute; Institute; Munro et al., Munro et al., 1999)1999)
Bryozoans
AscidiansSoft corals, gorgonians
Sponges
Toxicity at low ‘tissue’ concentration
Major marine target animals for biodiscovery
• 1974-1981: Roche Research Institute of Marine Pharmacology & Roche Pharmaceuticals• 1987-1992; 2003-present: Australian Institute of Marine Science (AIMS) & US National Cancer Institute (NCI)• 1993-present: Natural Products Discovery Griffith University (NPD) (+ Queensland Museum, Queensland Herbarium) & AstraZeneca (AZ)
Experiences in major ‘Biodiscovery’ collections (PPP)10kg biomass samples
collected 6 extracts screened/
week~2,100 extracts
screened over 7 years
100g biomass samples collected (200mg extract for screening)
180,000 extracts screened per dayModel example
• Cardiovascular• Respiratory • Inflammation• Gastrointestinal• Pain Control• Oncology• Infection• CNS
Specimen library(>30,000 plants, animals, microorganisms)
20,029
7,554
1,207
6,364 5,673
1,507 956
0
5,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
25,000
Number of BiotaQueensland Plants Queensland Marine OrganismsMicrobials China PlantsPNG Plants Queensland Terrestrial OrganismsTasmanian Marine Organisms
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
Extract Library(2D dot matrix coded microtube; 5 year shelf life; 384-well - 50 mL assay volume; 200 mg of sample gives > 800 assays)
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
NPD/ AZ partnershipNPD/ AZ partnership
High throughput screening:focussing on: Receptors, Enzymes, Mechanism based cellular assays(Cardiovascular, Respiratory, Inflammation, Gastrointestinal, Pain Control, Oncology, Infection, CNS)
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
NPD/ AZ partnershipNPD/ AZ partnership
Biota extract
Automated liquid handling and Screening
Fraction collection
ChromatographyRP / NP / Ion Exchange
Gel PermeationCountercurrent
AutomatedSeparation
Pure CompoundStructure Determination
MS / NMR Analysis
CRC
mixture
NHN
NH
HN
HN
O
HN
O
H2N
H2N
NH
NH
Br
Br
Br
Br
OH H
H ClH
OH
• Bioassay guided
fractionation• Isolation of
active constituent• Structure elucidation
• Lead optimisation
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
NPD/ AZ partnershipNPD/ AZ partnership
•Potential accessible chemical diversity (compounds with >0.001% yield) = 5-7 million compounds
~1500 bioactive compounds isolated to date, 23 new structure classes discovered, 38% are novel structures, majority with novel biological activity
Known Compound-
new activity
57%
Known Compound-
known Activity
5%
New Compound
38%
1
AU
0 . 0 0
0 . 5 0
1 . 0 0
1 . 5 0
2 . 0 0
2 . 5 0
3 . 0 0
M in u t e s2 . 0 0 4 . 0 0 6 . 0 0 8 . 0 0 1 0 . 0 0 1 2 . 0 0 1 4 . 0 0 1 6 . 0 0 1 8 . 0 0 2 0 . 0 0 2 2 . 0 0 2 4 . 0 0 2 6 . 0 0 2 8 . 0 0 3 0 . 0 0
1% yield
0.1% yield 10
10010000.01% yield
Compounds/biota
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
O
HN NH
NHHN
H2N
NH
HN Br
Br
O
HN
O NH
Br
Br
OHH
O
NHHN
HN NH
NH2
HN
NHBr
Br
O
NH
OHNBr
Br
HOH
O
4CF3COO
NH2
NH2
Stylissa flabellata from the GBR
P2XP2X77 antagonists may provide new antagonists may provide new treatment for treatment for inflammatory diseasesinflammatory diseases
New compound ‘‘StylissadinesStylissadines A A and Band B’’ specific antagonist for P2XP2X77(pain) receptor - purinergic ligand-gated ion channel (non-cytotoxic, IC50 1.8 mM)
(Buchanan et al. J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 2309-2317)
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
O
HN NH
NHHN
H2N
NH
HN Br
Br
O
HN
O NH
Br
Br
OHH
O
NHHN
HN NH
NH2
HN
NHBr
Br
O
NH
OHNBr
Br
HOH
O
4CF3COO
NH2
NH2
Stylissa flabellata from the GBR
P2XP2X77 antagonists may provide new antagonists may provide new treatment for treatment for inflammatory diseasesinflammatory diseases
New compound ‘‘StylissadinesStylissadines A A and Band B’’ specific antagonist for P2XP2X7 7 (pain) receptor - purinergic ligand-gated ion channel (non-cytotoxic, IC50 1.8 mM)
CSIRO CAAB bioclim model
(Buchanan et al. J. Org. Chem., 2007, 72, 2309-2317)
Slope and sides of coral reefs, below 10m depth
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
Aplysinella rhaxfrom the GBR
(Pham et al, J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 393 – 395)
Modulates Modulates cAMPcAMP via adenylate via adenylate cyclase effective for controlling cyclase effective for controlling blood flowblood flow, , cardiovascular systemcardiovascular systemand and metabolismmetabolism
Adenosine A1 antagonists PsammaplinPsammaplin AAand BisaprasinBisaprasin 1111’’--sulfatesulfate [3H]DPCPX binding to brain adenosine A1 receptors IC50
OHBr
NH
S SNHN
O O
NHO OH
ORBr
OHBr
NH
S SNHN
O O
N
HN
SSHN
OSO3NaBr
Br
OHOH
Br
N
OO
N
HOHO
OHOH
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
Aplysinella rhaxfrom the GBR
(Pham et al, J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 393 – 395)
Modulates Modulates cAMPcAMP via adenylate via adenylate cyclase effective for controlling cyclase effective for controlling blood flowblood flow, , cardiovascular systemcardiovascular systemand and metabolismmetabolism
Adenosine A1 antagonists PsammaplinPsammaplin AAand BisaprasinBisaprasin 1111’’--sulfatesulfate [3H]DPCPX binding to brain adenosine A1 receptors IC50
OHBr
NH
S SNHN
O O
NHO OH
ORBr
OHBr
NH
S SNHN
O O
N
HN
SSHN
OSO3NaBr
Br
OHOH
Br
N
OO
N
HOHO
OHOH
CSIRO CAAB bioclim modelCoral rubble, rock, shallow water
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
Adocia (=Haliclona) aculeata from the GBR
(Kalaitzis et al, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5571 – 5574)
OH
H H
-O3SO
OH
HO
AdociasulfateAdociasulfate 1,7,8,91,7,8,9iinhibits H+-ATPase proton pump IC50 essential to osteoclast bone resorption cell activity
HOH
H H
RO
OSO3-
OH
H H
H
-O3SO
H
OSO3- AdociasulfateAdociasulfate may reduce the may reduce the
rate of bone resorption and offer rate of bone resorption and offer therapeutic value in therapeutic value in osteoporosisosteoporosis
CSIRO CAAB bioclim model
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
Adocia (=Haliclona) aculeata from the GBR
(Kalaitzis et al, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 5571 – 5574)
OH
H H
-O3SO
OH
HO
AdociasulfateAdociasulfate 1,7,8,91,7,8,9iinhibits H+-ATPase proton pump IC50 essential to osteoclast bone resorption cell activity
HOH
H H
RO
OSO3-
OH
H H
H
-O3SO
H
OSO3- AdociasulfateAdociasulfate may reduce the may reduce the
rate of bone resorption and offer rate of bone resorption and offer therapeutic value in therapeutic value in osteoporosisosteoporosis
CSIRO CAAB bioclim modelencrusting on corals and gorgonians, deeper lagoon >15m depth
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
New species of marine sponge Citronia astra
from outer GBR
N
HN
HOH
H
O
HO
N NH2
NH2
NH
O
O
OSO3H3CO
New compound ‘‘DysinosinDysinosin AA’’,found to inhibit the binding of [I125] interleukin-8 [IL-8] to the human recombinant IL-8 receptor type A at IC50 = 154 nM
(Leone et al, J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 694 -697)
‘‘DysinosinDysinosin AA’’ found to be effective found to be effective in in oncologyoncology, awaiting Phase I trials, , awaiting Phase I trials, and also another compound effective and also another compound effective against human against human aa--thrombinthrombin
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
New species of marine sponge Citronia astra
from outer GBR
N
HN
HOH
H
O
HO
N NH2
NH2
NH
O
O
OSO3H3CO
New compound ‘‘DysinosinDysinosin AA’’,found to inhibit the binding of [I125] interleukin-8 [IL-8] to the human recombinant IL-8 receptor type A at IC50 = 154 nM
(Leone et al, J. Nat. Prod. 2000, 63, 694 -697)
‘‘DysinosinDysinosin AA’’ found to be effective found to be effective in in oncologyoncology, awaiting Phase I trials, , awaiting Phase I trials, and also another compound effective and also another compound effective against human against human aa--thrombinthrombin
CSIRO CAAB bioclim modelOuter barrier reef flat, on coral pavement, <5m depth
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
New species of Axinellasp.1333 from Sydney
AxinellaminesAxinellamines B, C and DB, C and D: minimum bactericidal concentration for inhibition of H. pylori of 1000 mM
NHN
NH
HN
HN
O
HN
O
H2N
H2N
NH
NH
Br
Br
Br
Br
OH H
H
OHHCl
NHN
NH
HN
HN
O
HN
O
H2N
H2N
NH
NH
Br
Br
Br
Br
OH H
H
OHHCl
(Urban et al, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 731 – 735)
Gastric bactericideGastric bactericide potentially potentially effective for treatment and effective for treatment and prevention of gastric and duodenal prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcer and gastric cancerulcer and gastric cancer
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
New species of Axinellasp.1333 from Sydney
AxinellaminesAxinellamines B, C and DB, C and D: minimum bactericidal concentration for inhibition of H. pylori of 1000 mM
NHN
NH
HN
HN
O
HN
O
H2N
H2N
NH
NH
Br
Br
Br
Br
OH H
H
OHHCl
NHN
NH
HN
HN
O
HN
O
H2N
H2N
NH
NH
Br
Br
Br
Br
OH H
H
OHHCl
(Urban et al, J. Org. Chem. 1999, 64, 731 – 735)
Gastric bactericideGastric bactericide potentially potentially effective for treatment and effective for treatment and prevention of gastric and duodenal prevention of gastric and duodenal ulcer and gastric cancerulcer and gastric cancer
CSIRO CAAB bioclim model
Common on rocky substrates, 8-35m depth, but Sydney region only
NPD/AZ partnership: Research State NPD/AZ partnership: Research State ‘‘commercialcommercial’’ benefitsbenefits
QM sponge collections: ~4,000 collection sites, ~30,000 specimen records,~5,000 morphospecies; datapoints all underpinned by verifiable objects
Coastal State benefits: environmental data (collections)
NPD/ AZIRD Noumea / CRISP
Univ Utah/ UPNG/ Wyeth/ ICBG - NIH
AIMS/ US NCI
Capacity building: Capacity building: Taxonomy (theory and practice of classifying organisms; systematics, biogeography)
Collections: verifiable objects that underpin biodiversity and biodiscovery research
Taxonomy: enabling science underpinning most other biological sciences;
essential to reliably differentiate MGRs in an international context (not to be confused with ‘sorting’ or ‘identification’)
Taxonomic capability: in crisis (Australia) 1980s: ~ 190 full-time (long-term employed) taxonomists2006: ~ 75 full-time taxonomists in museums, herbaria,
universities, other government agencies
Capacity building: Capacity building: Taxonomy (GBR Seabed biodiversity)•150,000 specimens collected over 3 years throughout GBR inter-reef•most identified to OTU level (i.e. same vs. different)•but few yet identified to species (many new ?)•Without true taxonomy, how can we determine if species are unique to the GBR or found in other Coastal States ?
unique or ubiquitous ?
SPICULES
Astrosclera`willeyana´
Morphological (phenotype) versus genotype species concept problem (ultraconservative sponge morphologies, deeply divergent genetically)(data Wörheide, 1998, Facies, 38: 1-88)
~1,500~500
Unknowable Unknowable (too (too difficult to difficult to collect, collect, DNA DNA probes)probes)
~15-17,000
~7,000~8,000Worldwide
~5,500-6,000
~2,000~3,500
~1,200~1,600
Australia (1992)(2006)
TotalsTotalsUnknown Unknown (collected, (collected, not not described)described)
Known Known (described)(described)
Capacity building: Capacity building: Taxonomic inventory
Coastal State benefits: Species diversity & similarity
10%10%
25%25%21%21%
8%8%
15%15%
18%18%
Tweed River (69)
Regional faunas
SE. Qld(233)
QldPlateau (95)
GBR (507)
Gulf of Carpentaria (142)
Sydney (131)
( = 50 spp)
(Hooper et al. Mem. Qld. Museum, 1999, 44: 263-274)
Biodiversity ‘hotspots’ (species rich, >250 spp/ region)
Species Species richnessrichness
(Hooper, Kennedy & Quinn, Biodiv. & Conserv., 2002, 11(5): 851-885)
Coastal State benefits: ‘Hotspots’ of species richness
Species poor regions (<50 spp/ region)
• Taxonomic relationships
• Evolutionary/ biogeographic history
• Artefacts of ancient connectivity
• Influenced by modern physical attributes (currents, sediments, etc)
Coastal State benefits:Phylogeneticrelationships
(Hooper, Kennedy & Quinn, Biodiv. & Conserv., 2002, 11(5): 851-885)
Coastal State benefits: molecular studies, genetic diversity versus morphological diversity (connectivity, isolation, hybridization: Leucetta `chagosensis´)
(Wörheide, Hooper & Degnan, Molecular Ecology , 2002, 11: 1753-1768)
ITS 1&2 + partial 28S (C2D2), 875+372bp; N=127
Genetic distinctiveness (Leucetta chagosensis)
S-Pacific
S-GBR, PNG, + QP
N-GBR + N-Pacific, QPMrBayes: ITS 1&2 + partial 28S (C2D2)
875+372bp; N=127
IndonesiaMaldives, Vanuatu (1)
(Wörheide, Hooper & Degnan, Molecular Ecology , 2002, 11: 1753-1768)
!!! Deep genetic divergence of N. & S. GBR populations
Genetic clade 3-1 southern GBR to Brisbane
Genetic clade 3-5 northern/ central GBR
Genetic clade 3-2 S-Pacific
Inferences from molecular data: Deep divergence in GBR
(Wörheide, Hooper & Degnan, Molecular Ecology , 2002, 11: 1753-1768)
Pleistocene Hypothesis:recolonization of the Great Barrier Reef after the low sea levels during the Pleistocene (1.8 M –12 K yrs ago)
(Wörheide, Hooper & Degnan, Molecular Ecology , 2002, 11: 1753-1768)
Modern day
Species refuges during destruction of GBR in Pleistocene
SEC
(Wörheide, Hooper & Degnan, Molecular Ecology , 2002, 11: 1753-1768)
Hypothesis:recolonization of the Great Barrier Reef after the low sea levels during the Pleistocene (1.8m –12k yrs ago)
Over the last 12,000 yrs
Exogenous recruitment
Reconnected populations (hybridization)
SEC
Climate change response ? Change of sea currents, new patterns of connectivity, increased severe storm events ? = loss of native faunas, increased invasive species via storm events (‘blowins’) ?
The future ?
?Today: marginal coral reef ecosystems
Tomorrow: important refuges for recruitment ?
Primers The standard barcoding fragment for the Barcoding of Life initiative is a ~ 640 bp long fragment located at the 5' site of the mitochondrial cytochrome oxidase subunit 1 (CO1). However, as this fragment might not display sufficient variability in sponges [1][2], we suggest sequencing an additional downstream region, which exhibits a higher substitution rate [3] in order to obtain a fragment of about 1,100 bp with a higher number of variable sites. A submission ITS-1 and 2 sequences, which could be added to the CO1-sequence tag, is also encouraged.
~600 sequences contributed to sponge barcodingproject (CO1, ITS-1 and 2) from samples collected from NPD/ AZ bio-discovery
http://www.spongebarcoding.org/
Qld species from biodiscovery used for sponge genome project
Coastal State benefits: Coastal State benefits: ‘‘Species turnoverSpecies turnover’’ –– Bioregional Bioregional boundaries boundaries E.g. E.g. CymbastelaCymbastela speciesspecies
Physical barrier or environmental gradient (such as during the Pleistocene landbridge)
Lack of gene flow across barrier
Coastal State benefits: Coastal State benefits: ‘‘Species turnoverSpecies turnover’’ –– Bioregional Bioregional boundaries boundaries (e.g.e.g. EchinodictyumEchinodictyum species) species)
Coastal State benefits:Coastal State benefits: ‘‘Species turnoverSpecies turnover’’, Bioregional , Bioregional modellingmodelling (aggregated data for ~3,500 species)(aggregated data for ~3,500 species)(Hooper & Ekins, 2004, National Oceans Office C2004/020: Hobart, http://www.oceans.gov.au/NMB.jsp).
Theoretical IMCRA DEMERSAL BIOREGIONS: 1999
Coastal State benefits:Coastal State benefits: ‘‘Species turnoverSpecies turnover’’, Bioregional , Bioregional modellingmodelling (aggregated data for ~3,500 species)(aggregated data for ~3,500 species)(Hooper & Ekins, 2004, National Oceans Office C2004/020: Hobart, http://www.oceans.gov.au/NMB.jsp).
Theoretical IMCRA DEMERSAL BIOREGIONS: 1999
Coastal State benefits:
Great Barrier Reef Marine Park Authority Representative Areas Program
Summary:
Research State benefits: legislative certainty for access, IP, benefit sharing etc.; partnerships with Coastal State researchers infrastructure; biodiscoveryproducts including building extract and compound libraries; discovery of new compounds and bioactive leads; potential commercialization = $ …
Coastal State benefits: ‘environmental data’ from biological collections, genetic and biochemical research; taxonomic and other capacity building support; contribution to barcoding projects; new knowledge pivotal to bioregional marine planning, management and ultimately conservation of MGRs; potential royalties …