Upload
meryl-payne
View
218
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MAY PRIMARY ACTIVITIES BE INNOVATIVE? THE CASE OF GALICIAN MUSSELL FARMING
GONZALO RODRÍGUEZ RODRÍGUEZDpto. de Economía Aplicada.
Universidade de Santiago de Compostela
THE GALICIAN MUSSEL FARMING:MAIN FEATURES.
YearProduction value (producción 94.612.000 1.999Value Added Basic Prices (€) 71.170.000 1.999Investment 34.963.608 1.999Investment growth rate 103% 1995-1999Production (Tn) 250.000Share of mussel spanish 98%Share of european production 50%Number of farms (bateas) 3.338 1.999Number of production units < 1.735 1.999Number of boats 1.061 1.999Employment (Equivalent full time) 7.141 1999
THE CONCEPT OF INNOVATION
ELEMENTS OF THE CONCEPT
• DEPARTURE POINT: Improve process.• ARRIVAL POINT: 1st world introduction and aplication of
certain advance.• SYSTEMATIC PROCESS: opposite to isolated activities.
THE CONCEPT OF INNOVATION
WHAT HAPPEN WITH THOSE ACTIVITIES THAT ARE JUST IN A CHANGE OR IN CATCHING UP
PROCESS?
MAY THE DEFINITION INTRODUCES ANOTHER ELEMENTS?
• Sectorial meeds of innovation.• Territorial dimension: local/regional or global innovation.• Temporal dimensión: historical character of innovation.
MUSSEL CULTURE PATTERNS IN THE USE OF TECHNOLOGY.
SUPPLIER DOMINATED.
• Technological chage came from supliers on machinery and other producction inputs.
• Most technology is transferred internationally embodied in capital goods.
• Technological accumulation is focused on producction process.
• Small size of firms.• Temporal dimensión: historical character of innovation.• Production learning and suppliers are the main sources of
technological accumulation.
THE MILIEU.
•Spatial entity.•Group of players•Specific material elements and also non-material and institutional elements.•An organizational logic.•A learning logic.
MILIEU
+ • The milieu it´s capable to open up to the exterior. Internacional relations.• Their resources are organized, coordinate and relate by economic, cultural and technical structures that restore the exploitable resources for news productive combinations
INNOVATOR MILIEU
MUSSEL FARMING AS A INNOVATOR MILIEU.IN
NO
VA
TO
R M
ILIE
U
MIL
IEU
Spatial Entity
Group of players
Specific material and non material elements
Organizational logic
Learning logic
Open up to exterior
Sustainable relations
Organizational vicinity
Producers, suppliers up stream, down stream, quality control,
Habours net, Mussel Council building / Specific culture
Dense organizative net; cooperativenesss
Main kind fo knowledge: Tacit
Exports (21%)International organizations
Change point
MUSSEL FARMING AS A “MILIEU”.
- +
+
Little innovationwithout “milieu”
Pontentially innovator “milieu”
Innovationwithout “milieu”
Innovator “milieu”
ORGANIZATION INDICATORS
LE
AR
NIN
G I
ND
ICA
TO
RS
SOURCE: IRER /1991
MUSSEL FARMING
CHRONOLOGY OF INNOVATION:
Sources of technological
accumulation
Periods Main directions of technological
accumulation
1946
Invection Born of mussel farming Process: farming system Product: mussel
1946-1962
Production learning Experimental period Process: Desing of the batea,Materials, Farming techniques,Location of the bateas,etc
1962-1975
Production Learning Growth period Process: Number of cords
1975-1995
Production Learning.Machinery suppliers
Modernization Period Process: Unfolder machyne, tubularnet, hydraulic crame, etc.
Management: organizationalstructure: sales central, associativenet.
1995-
Production learning.Suppliers.Consulting services.R&D institutions
Actual period Process: incremental innovations Product:new presentations. Management: DOP, Mussel Council
INSERTION OF THE MUSSEL CULTURE IN THE FISHING INNOVATION SYSTEM.
MUSSEL CULTURE
MUSSEL MILIEU
FISHING-CONSERVESSECTOR
R&D institutions
Tehnological centers
Training centers
Quality control centres
Specific magazines
Promote agency
Specific public administration
INSTITUCIONAL INFRAESTRUCTURE
(PROBABLE) CONCLUSIONS.
• The behavior of mussel culture is in the own parameters of the supply-dominated sectors.
• Mussel culture may be regarded a milieu potencially innovator, taking into account their strong organizational logic.
• Mussel culture needs longs periods to get new innovations, as a consecuence of the predominat use of tacit knowledge and It depends strongly to their environment to innovate.
• Most of their innovations has a regional character, but it means a increasing use of formal knowledge.
• Just this direction may be taking into account both by policy makers and for managment of innovation at firm level
• As a general hypothesis, we think that primary activities may be innovator but they have dificulties to accumulate enaugh capabilities. Them, they are very dependent of their productive environment. As they need to accelerate the learning and innvation process, they need to participate in more complex systems of innovation.