22
Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012 Northeastern University 1 MBTA Transport Assistance Nanda Kishore Bhat (Fall '11), Serkan Okur (Sp '12), Quazi Farhan (Fall '11) CCIS, Northeastern University [email protected] , [email protected] [email protected]

MBTA Transport Assistance

  • Upload
    zelda

  • View
    39

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

MBTA Transport Assistance. Nanda Kishore Bhat (Fall '11), Serkan Okur (Sp '12), Quazi Farhan (Fall '11) CCIS, Northeastern University [email protected] , [email protected] [email protected]. The problems. Unnecessarily waiting for MBTA transportation vehicles - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 1

MBTA Transport AssistanceNanda Kishore Bhat (Fall '11), Serkan Okur (Sp '12), Quazi Farhan (Fall '11)CCIS, Northeastern [email protected], [email protected]@husky.neu.edu

Page 2: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 2

The problems• Unnecessarily waiting for MBTA

transportation vehicles• Lack of application with good user

interface (HCI)• Lack of application with older adult

friendly user interface (HCI)

Page 3: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 3

Motivation• Introduced on Piazza by Prof. Intille• Evaluation of current similar applications

– Lack of HCI approach– Lack of older adult concentration

• Usability of the concept• Potential for backend implementation

Page 4: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 4

Surprise(s)

• Mainly by ethnography and prototype testing

• Familiarity of older adults to smart phones and applications

Page 5: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 5

Surprise(s)

• Interest issues of older adults on the subject

• We were definitely NOT our users (!)• Expectations from the application

Page 6: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 6

The best today• Covering only a particular line• Are not designed with HCI concept• Are not specifically concentrated on

older adults• Too complex

Page 7: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 7

Innovation• Easy to use.• Covers all T lines (except Silver T)• Not too many interfaces• Designed based on HCI concepts• Focusing on older adults• Tested on and improved by target users

Page 8: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 8

MBTA Transport Assistance• Main Screen

Page 9: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 9

MBTA Transport Assistance• Choosing by

T Stations

Page 10: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 10

MBTA Transport Assistance• Choosing by

T Lines

Page 11: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 11

MBTA Transport Assistance• Final (Result)

Screen

Page 12: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 12

Demo

Page 13: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 13

Video

Page 14: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 14

A UI challenge • Main Screen

v1.0

Page 15: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 15

A UI challenge • Main Screen

v2.0

Page 16: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 16

A UI challenge • Main Screen

v3.0

Page 17: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 17

Tricky programming problem • Final (Result)

Screenv7.0

Page 18: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 18

The future• Final Screen

– Could span to multiple scheduled T’s– Programming challenges

• Including the bus stops– Could include bus stops and bus timings– Deadline restrictions

Page 19: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 19

The future• Including text box input

– Could also include auto-refill text-box input– Deadline restrictions

• Reminder for selected buses/T’s– Future result page could include reminder

feature for each item– Deadline restrictions

Page 20: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 20

The future• Handling Internet Connection

deficiencies– Could still predict the arrival time depending

on previous data or timely schedule– Deadline restrictions.

• Designing the horizontal view of screens– Could also implement the horizontal views

of screens on smart phones– Deadline restrictions.

Page 21: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 21

Future process• More ethnographic research• Evaluate programming feasibility• Select better platform & environment• Adding functionalities iteratively• Thinking simple• More testing

Page 22: MBTA Transport Assistance

Computer/Human Interaction Spring 2012

Northeastern University 22

MBTA Transport Assistance• Gives the real time information of when

the next train will arrive to a specificT-station.

• It solves the inconvenience of waiting times for T’s (and possibly buses) with a better and easier interface that can be used without prior mobile experience. (especially for older adults)