MCLEAN COMMUNITY CLICK TO EDIT BUSINESS CENTER …...Jun 17, 2019 · CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE June 17, 2019 McLean Community Business Center Study 8 FCPS CIP (FY 2020-24)

CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE

MCLEAN COMMUNITY BUSINESS CENTER STUDY

Office of Facilities Planning Services

Department of Facilities and Transportation Services

June 17, 2019


Presentation Outline

• Existing conditions of FCPS schools serving the McLean Community Business Center (CBC)

• McLean CBC Plan Amendment

• Mitigating impacts for FCPS

June 17, 2019 McLean Community Business Center Study 2


Existing ConditionsFour schools serve the McLean CBC inSchool Year (SY)2018-19:

• McLean HS

• Longfellow MS

• Franklin Sherman ES

• Kent Gardens ES




• McLean HS

• Longfellow MS


• Kent Gardens ES




• McLean HS

• Longfellow MS


• Kent Gardens ES



Existing Conditions: Capacity Utilization

School

Program

Capacity

SY 2018-19

Current

Membership

(9/30/2018)

Capacity

Utilization

SY 2018-19

Projected

Membership

SY 2023-24

Capacity

Utilization

SY 2023-24

McLean HS 1,982 2,225 114% 2,505 126%

Longfellow MS 1,374 1,319 96% 1,500 109%

Franklin

Sherman ES437 392 90% 350 80%

Kent Gardens ES 848 996 117% 966 114%

Source: FCPS, FY 2020-24 Capital Improvement Program, January 2019.

Notes:

1) Projections are updated annually with each publication of the CIP.

2) The impacts of a plan amendment may occur beyond the five-year projection horizon and conditions of a school and/or school boundaries may change by the

time the residential density proposed by this plan amendment is realized.



Student Membership Projections

• Historical and current membership trends

• Birth trends

• Existing and new student programs

• New residential development under construction or recently completed:

• RZ 2011-PR-017 – The Commons (Building 1)

• RZ 2012-DR-019 – The Signet

For more information on projections, see Page 28 of the FCPS CIP (FY 2020-24).




FCPS CIP (FY 2020-24) Potential Solutions: McLean HS

A. Increase efficiency by reassigning instructional spaces within a school to accommodate increase in membership.

C. Minor interior facility modifications to create additional instructional space and help to accommodate capacity deficit.

D. Add temporary classrooms to accommodate short-term capacity deficit.

F. Capacity enhancement through either a modular or building addition.

H. Potential boundary adjustment with schools having a capacity surplus.



FCPS CIP (FY 2020-24) Potential Solutions: Longfellow MS

B. Possible program changes.





FCPS CIP (FY 2020-24) Potential Solutions:Franklin Sherman ES

• Monitor student membership

• Some schools are monitored for membership in the current school year. Based on the current and projected membership and current program capacity, these schools do not show a capacity deficit, but are monitored to ensure accommodation of unexpected population changes.



FCPS CIP (FY 2020-24) Potential Solutions:Kent Gardens ES

B. Possible program changes.


E. Repurpose existing inventory of school facilities not currently being used as schools.

F. Capacity enhancement through either a modular or building addition.




Plan Amendment: Student Yield Table

Number of

Housing Units

Total Potential

Student Yield

Existing1,279

(63 SFD, 518 SFA, 698 MF)

352

(104 HS, 54 MS, 194 ES)

Comprehensive Plan

Development Potential

(Adopted Plan)

2,174

(1 SFD, 702 SFA, 1,471 MF)

489

(142 HS, 75 MS, 272 ES)

Future Land Use Scenario

Development Potential

(Proposed Plan)

3,851

(0 SFD, 717 SFA, 3,134 MF)

682

(195 HS, 108 MS, 379 ES)

Sources:

1) FCPS, 2015 Countywide Student Yield Ratios, November 2016.

2) FCPS, Certified Membership, September 30, 2018.

Notes:

1) The total potential student yield was calculated based on all of the multi-family housing units being mid/high-rise multi-family housing units (five stories or greater),

based on Fairfax County’s Vision Plan for the McLean CBC.

2) If low-rise multi-family units were to be developed in the McLean CBC, the total potential student yield will be higher as low-rise multi-family housing units yield

more students on average than mid/high-rise multi-family units.


2017 Policy Plan: Public Facilities -Objectives for Public Schools

6. Acquire sites for schools or educational facilities through negotiation, dedication, or condemnation. This may include the siting of schools or facilities in high density areas or on parcels of limited size.

• Safe and convenient accessibility to pedestrian and road networks, and transit where available.

• Proximity to other public facilities, such as police / fire / rescue services, public parks, and libraries.

7. Distribute administration and maintenance facilities to conveniently serve the areas they support where feasible.

8. Locate schools on sites which meet or exceed minimum state size guidelines where feasible.



2017 Policy Plan: Public Facilities -Objectives for Public Schools

9. Design schools and educational facilities to allow for optimal site utilization while providing optimum service to, and compatibility with, the local community.

• Locate schools in relation to residential or mixed-use areas, the road network, traffic patterns and transit.

• Elementary schools should be located in, or on the periphery of, residential or mixed-use areas.

10. Consider adaptive reuse of buildings for public schools and educational purposes.

11. Encourage optimization of existing schools and other facilities, whenever possible and reasonable, to support educational and community objectives.



www.fcps.edu


Documents

MCLEAN COMMUNITY CLICK TO EDIT BUSINESS CENTER …...Jun 17, 2019 · CLICK TO EDIT MASTER TITLE STYLE June 17, 2019 McLean Community Business Center Study 8 FCPS CIP (FY 2020-24)