Upload
prateek-chaturvedi
View
229
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
1/30
Firm and Its Long-term Costs
Analysis
By:Group 6Astha Singh 2010057Hitesh Babbar 2010079
Jaya Dadlani 2010084Jhanvi Thakkar 2010086Nirmal Modh 2010099
Prateek Chaturvedi 2010295
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
2/30
COST
Total Cost - the sum of all costs incurred in productionTC = FC + VC
Average Cost the cost per unitof output
AC = TC/OutputMarginal Cost the cost of one more or one fewer units of
productionMC= TC n TC n-1 units
Short run P eriod of time for which some production factorsare fixed and some can vary.
Long run P eriod of time for which all the production factorscan vary.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
3/30
Analyzing the Long RunT he long run is a period of time for which following
conditions hold:1. T he firm is operating for a significant amount of
time taken to vary all factors of production.2. Firms can enter or exit an industry.
3. With long-term decline in demand, firms will prevalently cut fixed costs.4. With long-term rise in demand, firms will
prevalently choose innovations that allow them toreduce variable costs.5. T he period of time varies according to the firmand the industry
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
4/30
Analyzing the Long Run
typical firm.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
5/30
Ec onomies of S c ale E
conomies of scale refers to the phenomena of decreased per unit cost as the number of units of production increase.It is a Long run concept
Types : Internal E conomies of Scale E xternal E conomies of Scale
Why it is Important?
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
6/30
Real world LA C s in Manufa c turing
In the example shown when the business increases the scale of productionfrom P lant 1 (with 10 units of labour and 10 units of capital) to P lant 2 (adoubling of the inputs used), total output quadruples. T his shows increasingreturns to scale leading to a fall in the average total cost of production. Afurther increase in scale to P lant 3 demonstrates constant returns to scale where
both inputs and output have increased by 50% and a further expansion of scaleto P lant 4 illustrates decreasing returns to scale where inputs have grown by
33% but output has grown by just 15%. When a firm experiences decreasingreturns to scale, then average total cost will rise in other words diseconomiesof scale exist.
I nput Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 3 Plant 4
10 40 100 130 150
20 100 160 180 210
30 130 180 240 250
40 150 200 255 275
50 160 210 270 290
Capital I nput 10 20 30 40
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
7/30
Real world LA C s in Manufa c turing
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
8/30
Real world LA C s in Manufa c turing
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
9/30
C aselet 1: T he long run average c ostc urve in E le c tric ity Generation
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
10/30
LAC c urve in E le c tric ity GenerationLAC is L shaped be c ause of in c reasing &
de c reasing returns to s c ale operatetogether.Power c ompanies buying more power
from independent produc
ers to minimizec ost of produ c tion that would be in c urredin produ c ing more power.Deregulation and end of monopoly power.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
11/30
Ec onomies of S c aleIncreasing returns to Scale
O utputs c hange by larger proportion thaninputsProfic ien c y of workers and avoidan c e of timelostMore spe c ialized and produ c tive ma c hinery
c an be usedFirms need smaller inventory as s c ale of operation in c reasesPrevails at smaller levels of output
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
12/30
Ec onomies of S c aleD ecreasing returns to Scale:
O utputs c hanges by lower proportionthan inputsArises as s c ale of operation in c reases, it
be c omes diffi c ult to manage firmseffe c tivelyPrevails at larger levels of output
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
13/30
L shaped LA C
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
14/30
W hy L-shaped LA C c urve?Ec onomies of s c ale are rather qui c kly
exhausted and c onstant or near c onstant returns to s c ale prevail over a c onsiderable range of outputs.Lowest point of c urve o cc urs when thefor c es of in c reasing and de c reasingreturns to s c ale just balan c e ea c hother.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
15/30
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
16/30
Introdu c tion Like servi c e firms many manufa c tures
foc us on c ustomer inquiry system ,produ c treliability, quality c hara c teristi c s like brandloyalty and te c hnologi c al innovations.
T o c apture large c hunk of market share
quality c hara c teristi c s and support servi c esbeyond physi c al unit of produ c tion arerequired.
W ith innovation and advan c ement inte c hnology in c reasing returns persist.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
17/30
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
18/30
Innovationsa) Produ c t Innovation - new produ c ts or
improvements on produ c ts eg:- newmodels of mobile phones and so on.b) Pro c ess Innovation - where some part
of the pro c ess is improved to bring benefit.Just in T ime applied by wall mart is a goodexample.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
19/30
C on c lusionIn long run as market share in c reases
c osts su c h as promotional andmarketing c osts are lower to trigger another adoption.
T he only limitation in the adoption of su c h innovations is that one needs togo for these new adoptions again andagain.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
20/30
C aselet 3: How exa c tly has the informationte c hnology lowered c osts at C hevron and
Mer c k?
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
21/30
T e c hnology at C hevronC hevron spent 2-4 million ea c h drilling 10-
12 exploratory wells before finding oil.Introdu c tion of new te c hnology: 3Dgraphs, c al c ulation intensive simulationmodeling resulted in making mu c h morea cc urate lo c ation of se c ondary wells or known oil fields.O verall produ c tion c ost shrunk by 16%.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
22/30
T e c hnology at Mer c kE xperimenting on known a c tive c ompoundsinvolved lot of time c onsuming c hemi c al trials.T otal time to introdu c tion of new pharma c euti c alwas often longer than a de c ade.After te c hnologi c al upgrade mi c ro c hip c ontrolled
and automated mac
hines performed thousandsof rea c tions at on c e and tally the results.2/3rd redu c tion in time c onsumed and attendants
c osts have de c lined a cc ordingly.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
23/30
T e c hnologi c al Advan c ements
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
24/30
Inc reasing Returns to S c aleInc reasingreturns tos c ale due toT e c hnologi c aladvan c es
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
25/30
C aselet 4: GM de c ides small is better
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
26/30
INT RO DUCT IO NGeneral Motors, the largest
c orporation and c armaker in theworld had a turbulent de c ade in1990s.
It inc urred huge losses and toover c ome that GM c losed some of the plants and redu c ed theworkfor c e,but this was not suffi c ient.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
27/30
De c reasing returns to s c aleT he firms are fa c ed with de c reasing returns to s c alewhen a c ertain proportionate c hange in inputs, lead to
less than proportionatec
hange in output.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
28/30
C auses of Diminishing return tos c ale
T he de c reasing returns to s c ale areattributed to the dise c onomies of s c ale.T he most important fa c tor c ausing this isthe diminishing return to management.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
29/30
C on c lusionHenc e it restru c tured its strategy by
redu c ing the no. of models, c uttingaverage manufa c turingtime, c entralised its vast sales and
servic
es and marketing system.Henc e to sustain GM need togenerate ex c itement over its newmodels and c oax buyers.
8/8/2019 ME group 6(2)
30/30
T hank you