41
Preconference Workshop March 5, 2015, 9am-4pm Desert Willow Conference Center Phoenix, Arizona Measuring PBIS/MTSS Fidelity, Outcomes and Impact Daniel Gulchak, Ph.D. VP Education & Research, KOI Education Daniel Davidson, Ph.D. PBISAz Project Director, Institute for Human Development - Northern Arizona University Celeste Nameth, M.Ed. MTBS(Multi-Tier Behavioral Support) Education Specialist, Arizona Dept. of Education

Measuring PBIS/MTSS Fidelity, Outcomes and Impact · Preconference Workshop March 5, 2015, 9am-4pm Desert Willow Conference Center Phoenix, Arizona Measuring PBIS/MTSS Fidelity, Outcomes

  • Upload
    vantram

  • View
    214

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Preconference WorkshopMarch 5, 2015, 9am-4pmDesert Willow Conference CenterPhoenix, Arizona

Measuring PBIS/MTSS Fidelity, Outcomes and Impact

After this workshop participants will be able to:• Demonstrate the skills to be a PBIS Assessment Coordinator for your district, including how to

use over a dozen evidence-based fidelity surveys.• Understand SET evaluation and qualify to conduct this research-based interview/observation

tool for your district or region to assess implementation integrity.• Identify seclusion and restraint laws/regs and how to conduct a complete assessment in order

to reduce future incidence rates and occurrences.

This training has never been offered in Arizona before now, and is perfect for PBIS/MTSS team leaders! Three experts in PBIS/MTSS will lead participants through three critical areas of analyzing your impact at school. 1) Learn to use the nationally available PBISapps Assessment tools to automatically graph all your fidelity data across years, apply for awards, and easily improve your PBIS/MTSS outcomes. 2) Gain the expertise to become a skilled SET Evaluator for your school or district by completing a series of hands-on activities and case studies. 3) Hear the latest news about how to use PBIS/MTSS to reduce seclusion/restraint, abide by ever changing laws, and positively impact the most challenging students. Bring your laptop or mobile device for maximum engagement!

Cost: $219.00, includes lunch, snacks and (6) Continuing Education Credits.

Or visit http://bet-c.org/attendees/Click Here to Register

Daniel Gulchak, Ph.D. VP Education & Research, KOI Education

Daniel Davidson, Ph.D.PBISAz Project Director, Institute for Human Development - Northern Arizona University

Celeste Nameth, M.Ed.MTBS(Multi-Tier Behavioral Support) Education Specialist, Arizona Dept. of Education

Preconference WorkshopMarch 5, 2015, 9am-4pmDesert Willow Conference CenterPhoenix, Arizona

Measuring PBIS/MTSS Fidelity, Outcomes and Impact

After this workshop participants will be able to:• Demonstrate the skills to be a PBIS Assessment Coordinator for your district, including how to

use over a dozen evidence-based fidelity surveys.• Understand SET evaluation and qualify to conduct this research-based interview/observation

tool for your district or region to assess implementation integrity.• Identify seclusion and restraint laws/regs and how to conduct a complete assessment in order

to reduce future incidence rates and occurrences.

This training has never been offered in Arizona before now, and is perfect for PBIS/MTSS team leaders! Three experts in PBIS/MTSS will lead participants through three critical areas of analyzing your impact at school. 1) Learn to use the nationally available PBISapps Assessment tools to automatically graph all your fidelity data across years, apply for awards, and easily improve your PBIS/MTSS outcomes. 2) Gain the expertise to become a skilled SET Evaluator for your school or district by completing a series of hands-on activities and case studies. 3) Hear the latest news about how to use PBIS/MTSS to reduce seclusion/restraint, abide by ever changing laws, and positively impact the most challenging students. Bring your laptop or mobile device for maximum engagement!

Cost: $219.00, includes lunch, snacks and (6) Continuing Education Credits.

Or visit http://bet-c.org/attendees/Click Here to Register

Daniel Gulchak, Ph.D. VP Education & Research, KOI Education

Daniel Davidson, Ph.D.PBISAz Project Director, Institute for Human Development - Northern Arizona University

Celeste Nameth, M.Ed.MTBS(Multi-Tier Behavioral Support) Education Specialist, Arizona Dept. of Education

Who are you, Where are you from, and What is your PASSION?

Tall GrandeVenti

Tea

What is your familiarity with PBIS?

Agenda

1. PBISaz - Dr. Daniel Gulchak, PBISaz Advisory Committee

2. PBIS Apps - Dr. Daniel Gulchak, KOI Education

3. SET Training - Celeste Nameth, ADE/ESS/MTSS

4. Seclusion & Restraint - Dr. Dan Davidson, NAU

10:30 - 10:45 BREAK 12:00 - 12:45 LUNCH 2:30 - 2:45 BREAK

Workshop 9:00 - 4:00

PBISaz.org

Visit PBISaz.org

What is PBIS?• Overview • History of PBISaz • Leadership requirements

Getting Started• District Readiness

Agreement • School Readiness

Agreement • School Outcome

Criteria • Service Provider

Criteria

Visit PBISaz.org

Award Winning Schools• Merit - Tier 0 • Bronze - Tier 1 • Silver - Tier 1+ • Gold - Tier 1/2/3 • Copper State - Tier 1/2/3+

Visit PBISaz.org

PBISapps + PBIS Assessment

Objectives1. Purpose of PBIS Assessment2. PBIS Assessment Coordinators3. Fidelity Surveys Activity4. Online Demonstration

Purpose of PBIS Assessment• A web-based application designed to assist in high-fidelity,

sustained implementation of school-wide positive behavioral interventions and supports (SWPBIS).

• Free for every school interested in collecting survey data for their building

https://www.pbisapps.org/Applications/Pages/PBIS-Assessment.aspx#evaluation

Functions of PBIS Assessment• Initial assessment of discipline practices to determine how

SWPBIS should be adopted. • Implementation assessment of the fidelity with which

schools use SWPBIS procedures. • Sustained assessment of SWPBIS implementation at all

three tiers to promote ongoing use of core SWPBIS features. • Action plan creation to improve implementation fidelity.

PBIS Assessment CoordinatorsPrimary Responsibility:

• To open/close PBIS/MTSS fidelity surveys for schools and PBIS team members

PBIS Assessment CoordinatorsSecondary Responsibility, identify:

• Which schools are collecting and using data • How schools are progressing • What support may be of greatest value for any one team

Getting Started1. Contact a local PBIS Assessment Coordinator

OR

2. Apply to be the Assessment Coordinator for your district

https://www.pbisapps.org/Applications/Pages/Getting-Started-With.aspx#assessment

Application• Complete the Local Coordinator Information Form • Email form to [email protected]

ReflectionTake one minute to teach someone about the purpose of PBIS Assessment and the roles of a Coordinator

Assessments/Surveys• Research-Based • Published in Peer Reviewed Journals • Scientifically proven to be valid, reliable &

psychometrically sound

https://www.pbisapps.org/Applications/Pages/PBIS-Assessment-Surveys.aspx

Tier 1 • TIC • BOQ • TFI • SAS • SET

Tier 2/3 • MATT • BAT • TFI • ISSET

Other • SUBSIST • SWPBIS ISA

Surveys

TIC: Team Implementation Checklist• Tier 1 Progress Monitoring • Self-Assessment • Quarterly until you

reach 80%

BOQ: Benchmarks of Quality• Tier 1 Fidelity • Self-Assessment • Annually after you

reach 80% on TIC

SAS: Self-Assessment Survey• Tier 1 Staff Perception • Self-Assessment • Annually

TFI: Tiered Fidelity Inventory• Tier 1, 2, and/or 3 Fidelity • Self-Assessment • Quarterly or

Annually

SET: Schoolwide Evaluation Tool• Tier 1 Fidelity • External Evaluator • Annual review of school

documents & Interviews with administrator, staff and students.

Horner, R. H., Todd, A., Lewis-Palmer, T., Irvin, L., Sugai, G., & Boland, J. (2004).The school-wide evaluation tool (SET): A research instrument for assessing school-wide positive behavior support. Journal of Positive Behavior Intervention 6(1) 3-12.

MATT: Monitoring Advanced Tier Tool• Tier 2/3 Progress Monitoring • Self-Assessment,

completed with your coach

• Quarterly until you reach 80%

Anderson, Childs, Kincaid, Horner, George, Todd, Sampson, & Spaulding (2009).

BAT: Benchmarks of Advanced Tiers• Tier 2/3 Fidelity • Self-Assessment • Quarterly after you

reach 80% with the MATT

Anderson, Childs, Kincaid, Horner, George, Todd, Sampson, & Spaulding (2009).

ISSET: Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool• Tier 2/3 Fidelity • External Evaluator • Annual review of school

documents & Interviews with administrator, staff and students.

Anderson, Lewis-Palmer, Todd, Horner, Sugai, & Sampson (2011).

SUBSIST: Schoolwide PBIS Universal Behavior Sustainability Inventory• Sustainability • Self-Assessment • Annually

10 Individual Student Systems Evaluation Tool version 2.8, February 2011 Anderson, Lewis-Palmer, Todd, Horner, Sugai & Sampson Educational and Community Supports, University of Oregon

Part I: Foundations Feature Evaluation Question

Data Source P=product I=interview

Glossary Corresponding Interview

Question Score:

0-2 3. Does the BST Leader report that the

school-wide team monitors the number of students receiving targeted and/or intensive supports on at least a monthly basis?

0= no, 1= yes, but less than monthly, 2= yes

Behavior support team leader interview

I

SWPBS Team: The team that monitors implementation of the universal level of school-wide PBS. BST: Behavior team that meets regarding students receiving targeted or intensive supports.

Does the school-wide team monitor the number of students on targeted and/or individual supports? Yes No

If yes, how often? _________

4. Can the administrator identify a person(s)

who is coordinating targeted and intensive interventions across all students in the school?

(0= no, 1= identified, but works outside of the school, 2= identified and on school staff)

Administrator interview Other

I

Coordinating: Summarizing outcomes graphically and reviewing progress at least every other week and making data-based decisions about student progress. Works outside the school: An itinerant position—not in the school full-time.

Is there someone identified as the coordinator of function-based support for all the students in your school? (Yes No

If yes, is that person on your school staff? Yes No If yes, who is it?

5. Is there a person(s) on, or available to,

the school behavior support team who is trained to conduct functional behavioral assessments and lead a team in use of functional behavioral assessment information to develop behavior support plans?

(0=no, 2= yes)

Administrator interview Other

I

Is there a person(s) on, or available to, the school behavior support team who is trained to conduct functional behavioral assessments and lead a team in the use of functional behavioral assessment information to develop behavior support plans? Yes No

B. Team Based

Planning

1. Is there a team that receives requests for

behavioral assistance, monitors behavior support plans, and monitors intervention results?

(0= no, 2= yes)

Administrator interview Other

I

Team (meetings): At least two people who meet regarding students receiving targeted or intensive supports (same two people).

Do you have a team of two or more people at your school that receives requests for assistance, develops support plans and monitors intervention results? Yes No

2. Do meeting minutes/meeting schedule

reflect that the behavior support team meets at least monthly?

(0= no, 2= yes)

Behavior support team meeting minutes Other

P

How often does this team meet?

McIntosh, K., MacKay, L. D., Hume, A., Doolittle, J. D., Vincent, C. G., Horner, R. H., et al. (2009). Development and

validation of a measure to assess factors related to sustainability of school-wide positive behavior support.

SWPBIS ISA:Implementation Self-Assessment

• SWPBIS Blueprint • Self-Assessment Survey • District PBIS Leadership Team

SWPBS Implementation Blueprint version September 25 2010 � Page 100

SWPBS Implementation Self-Assessment and Planning Tool

IMPLEMENTATION FEATURE IN PLACE STATUS

Yes Partial No

Lead

ersh

ip T

eam

1. Capacity to address multi-school (district) and/or multi-district (region, state) leadership and coordination.

2. Leadership Team with representation from appropriate range of stakeholders (e.g., special education, general education, families, mental health, administration, higher education, professional development, evaluation & accountability).

3. Completion of SWPBS Implementation Blueprint self-assessment at least annually.

4. 3-5 year prevention-based action plan that delineates actions linked to each feature of the Implementation Blueprint.

5. Regular meeting schedule (at least quarterly) & meeting process (agenda, minutes, dissemination).

Horner & Sugai (2002).

Tier 1 • TIC • BOQ • TFI • SAS • SET

Tier 2/3 • MATT • BAT • TFI • ISSET

Other • SUBSIST • SWPBIS ISA

Surveys

ActivityWhat is the value of having different fidelity assessment tools? What are the challenges?

Discussion

PBIS Assessment Video Tutorials• https://www.pbisapps.org/Resources/Pages/

PBIS-Assessment-Overview-Webinar.aspx • https://www.pbisapps.org/Resources/Pages/

PBIS-Assessment-Videos.aspx

Login• Use your own email address and password to login

User LevelsAccess

Online Demo• Open PBISapps.org • Find the Demo page . . .

ReflectionWhat is the difference between these user levels: - Read Only- Team Member- Coordinator- Supervisor

Action Plan

Action Plan• 3 Desired Outcomes • Strategy/Resources • Person Responsible • Completion Date

Knowledge. Outcomes. [email protected]

koi-education.com 480.420.6564