32
Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk? (Provisional findings) Dr Kerris Cooper and Dr Polina Obolenskaya 16 th July 2019 CASE Social Exclusion/SPDO Seminar: Inequalities across critical areas of life: Looking back over two decades

Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    3

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Measuring violent crime: who is really most at

risk? (Provisional findings)

Dr Kerris Cooper and Dr Polina Obolenskaya

16th July 2019 CASE Social Exclusion/SPDO Seminar: Inequalities across critical areas of life: Looking back over two decades

Page 2: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Disclaimer

This is work in progress and findings in this presentation should be treated as provisional.

This work contains statistical data from ONS which is Crown Copyright. The use of the ONS statistical data in this work does not imply the endorsement

of the ONS in relation to the interpretation or analysis of the statistical data. This work uses

research datasets which may not exactly reproduce National Statistics aggregates.

Page 3: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Outline

•  Motivation: How fits into wider SPDO programme

•  Context: Is progress stalling in reducing violent crime?

•  Focus: How has experience of violent crime changed for

different groups?

•  Aims

•  What do we already know?

•  Data and methods

•  Results

•  Discussion

Page 4: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Motivation

Part of SPDO programme funded by Nuffield Foundation. Central aim: to evaluate what progress has been made in reducing inequalities through social polices? Across ten policy areas e.g. health, education, employment Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies, spending and outcomes Part of quantitative analysis of distributional outcomes

-  Aim to answer the following questions: •  What progress has been made in reducing violent crime over

the last two decades? •  Who is most at risk of experiencing violent crime? •  How has this changed over time?

Page 5: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Context: Is progress in reducing violent crime stalling?

Page 6: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Context – is progress stalling in reducing violent crime?

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

5,000,000

Num

bero

finciden

ts

Violence withinjury withoutinjury

Number of violent incidents in England and Wales, based on CSEW

Source:datafromONS,(2019)CrimeinEnglandandWales:yearendingDecember2018,Figure8

Page 7: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Context – is progress stalling in reducing violent crime?

0

5000

10000

15000

20000

25000

30000

35000

40000

45000

2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Num

bero

foffe

nces

Knife/sharpinstrumentoffences*

Source:ONS(2019)CrimeinEnglandandWales:yearendingSeptember2018producedusingdataforFigure3.*Excludingknife/sharpinstrumentoffencesrecordedbyGreaterManchesterPoliceForce.Note:AllyearsaretoMarchapartfrom2017,2018whicharetotheyearendingSeptember

Police recorded offences involving a knife/sharp instrument

Page 8: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Context – is progress stalling in reducing violent crime?

Homicide index – rate of homicides per million population

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

20

Rateofh

omicidesperm

illionpo

pulaZo

n

Source: ONS (2019) Homicide in England and Wales: year ending March 2018 data from Figure 1

Page 9: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Focus: How has experience of violent crime changed for different groups?

Page 10: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

How is violent crime measured?

0

500,000

1,000,000

1,500,000

2,000,000

2,500,000

3,000,000

3,500,000

4,000,000

4,500,000

5,000,000

Num

bero

finciden

ts

Violence withinjury withoutinjury

Number of violent incidents in England and Wales, based on CSEW

Source:datafromONS,(2019)CrimeinEnglandandWales:yearendingDecember2018,Figure8

Not included in this measure: -  rape, attempted rape or

indecent assault (main questionnaire)

-  Sexual and domestic violence (self-completion)

Page 11: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Prevalence of sexual assault for adults aged 16 – 59 years by gender, CSEW

Source: ONS (2018) Sexual offences in England and Wales: year ending March 2017, Appendix Table 4

0.0

1.0

2.0

3.0

4.0

5.0

6.0

7.0

8.0

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017

%ofthe

pop

ulaZ

on

women men

What is not included in the official violent crime measure?

Page 12: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Prevalence of domestic abuse for adults aged 16 – 59 years by gender, CSEW

What is not included in the official violent crime measure?

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018

Percen

tageofvicZm

sonceorm

ore

Men Women

Source: ONS (2018) Domestic abuse in England and Wales: Year ending March 2018. Note no data for 2008

Femicidecensus:139womenkilledbymenin2017,anincreaseonprevious2years

Page 13: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Aims

To estimate: Ø prevalence of violent crime over time Ø and how experiences differ according to personal

characteristics including gender In order to estimate this accurately we need to account for

violence against women which is under-estimated in official measures because

1.  The following offences are not included in the overall

violent crime measure: rape, attempted rape and indecent assault (main questionnaire)

2.  Domestic violence / sexual violence experiences are not used in the overall measure (self-completion – more likely to be disclosed)

Page 14: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Why is this important?

1.  Currently under-estimating violence in a way that is

under-estimating violence against women in particular

2.  CSEW provides the official measure of crime in England and Wales– potentially influential for policy

3.  Ethical consideration – respondents have shared this sensitive information and we have an obligation to therefore to make use of it

Page 15: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

What do we know already?

Sylvia Walby and colleagues (e.g. Walby, Towers & Francis 2014, 2016; Walby & Towers 2017) have long been arguing for inclusion ‘sexual offences’ in addition to the ONS ‘violence against the person’ measure. Focus on number of violent offences (uncapped and and including sexual offences) shows very different trend to official statistics which under-estimates violent crime experienced by women. Walby et al. had also recommended including data on domestic and sexual violence but there is no way of doing this when based on number of incidents

Page 16: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

How do we build on this?

Reconstructing the measure of violent crime: •  Adding ‘sexual violence’ (rape, attempted

rape and indecent assault) to the overall measure of violence. Focusing on number of individuals that experience violence.

•  Main contribution: Adding domestic

violence and sexual violence from the self-completion questionnaire

•  Examine changes in experiences of violence by gender, age, ethnicity and disability status

Page 17: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Data and methods I

Using the Crime Survey for England and Wales (CSEW), secure access. This is an annual victim-based survey of around 35,000 respondents from 1981 until latest release 2017/18.

We use data on violent crime from the victim survey (face-to-face) and data on domestic and sexual violence (self-completion module).

Sample restricted to those aged 16 – 59 years. We compare prevalence of violent crime in 2004/5 and

2017/18, overall and by: - gender - age - ethnicity - disability

Page 18: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Data and methods II

Compare estimates of violent crime experienced by different groups based on

- ONS official measure: serious wounding; other wounding; common assault; attempted assault; serious wounding with sexual motive; other wounding with sexual motive

- Our measure: includes the above offences + Additional offences: rape; attempted rape and indecent assault + Domestic and sexual violence (self-completion)

Page 19: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Results: Comparing the official measure of violent crime with our inclusive measure overall and by gender

Page 20: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Violent crime overall – Comparing all 3 measures (adults age 16-59)

Source: Authors’ analysis using ONS [Office for National Statistics], Crime Survey for England and Wales, Secure access dataset, SN 7280 (8th edition).

Page 21: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Violent crime by gender – Official (ONS) violent crime measure (adults age 16-59)

Source: Authors’ analysis using ONS [Office for National Statistics], Crime Survey for England and Wales, Secure access dataset, SN 7280 (8th edition).

Page 22: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Violent crime by gender – our inclusive measure (including domestic and sexual violence), adults age 16-59

Source: Authors’ analysis using ONS [Office for National Statistics], Crime Survey for England and Wales, Secure access dataset, SN 7280 (8th edition).

Page 23: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Results: Using our inclusive measure of violence, how has experience of violence changed for other groups?

Page 24: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Violent crime by ethnicity – our inclusive measure (adults age 16-59)

Source: Authors’ analysis using ONS [Office for National Statistics], Crime Survey for England and Wales, Secure access dataset, SN 7280 (8th edition).

Page 25: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Violent crime by disability – our inclusive measure (adults age 16-59)

Source: Authors’ analysis using ONS [Office for National Statistics], Crime Survey for England and Wales, Secure access dataset, SN 7280 (8th edition).

Page 26: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Violent crime by age – our inclusive measure (adults age 16-59)

Source: Authors’ analysis using ONS [Office for National Statistics], Crime Survey for England and Wales, Secure access dataset, SN 7280 (8th edition).

Page 27: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Summary and conclusion I

When we include domestic and sexual violence in the overall violence measure we see that: •  More people experience violence than official ONS

measure shows

•  Between 2005 and 2018 the risk of violence decreased less steeply for women than men

•  By 2018 women are actually at greater risk of experiencing violence than men

•  This is particularly significant as the CSEW provides

the official measure of crime

Page 28: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Summary and conclusion II

We also find that between 2005 and 2018 the decrease in violent crime was not experienced by all groups:

•  Disability: increased significantly for people with a non-limiting illness; no significant change for those with limiting disabilities

•  Ethnicity: no significant change for those from mixed or black ethnic group

•  Age: Increased significantly for those aged 50-59 years

Page 29: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Limitations and further research

Limitations -  Concentrating on victims rather than number of offences

under-estimates repeated experiences of violence which particularly affects women

-  Age range is limited as self-completion module is answered by 16 – 59 year olds only and up to 74 year olds in latest year

Further research à We plan to look at other characteristics including household

composition (couple parents/single parents etc), education level and IMD decile

à Interaction effects e.g. disability and age

à Potential to look at more years – focus on last 4 years

Page 30: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Kerris Cooper [email protected] @CooperKerris Polina Obolenskaya [email protected] @OboleP

SPDO project website:

h]p://sZcerd.lse.ac.uk/case/_new/research/spdo/default.asp

Page 31: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

References

Walby,S.,Towers,J.,Francis,B.,2014.ThedeclineintherateofdomesZcviolencehasstopped:RemovingthecaponrepeatvicZmisaZonrevealsmoreviolence.Walby,S.,Towers,J.,Francis,B.,2016.IsViolentCrimeIncreasingorDecreasing?aNewMethodologytoMeasureRepeatA]acksMakingVisibletheSignificanceofGenderWalby,S.,Towers,J.S.,2017.Measuringviolencetoendviolence:mainstreaminggender.J.Gend.-BasedViolence1,11–31.h]ps://doi.org/10.1332/239868017X14913081639155

Page 32: Measuring violent crime: who is really most at risk ...sticerd.lse.ac.uk/dps/case/events/Inequalities... · Policy paper Cooper and Lacey (2019) Safety and Security 2015 -2020: policies,

Data References

ONS[OfficeforNaZonalStaZsZcs](2019),CrimeSurveyforEnglandandWales,1996-2018:SecureAccess[datacollecZon]8thEdiZon.UKDataService.SN:7290.h]p://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7280-8