Upload
others
View
5
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF BAMBOO FIBRE
WITH GRAPHENE AS A FILLER MATERIAL IN
POLYESTER COMPOSITE
Kolli Balasivarama Reddy[1]
, Annumula Sai Kiran Reddy[2]
, Sagala Bharath Sai Chand[3]
,
Paricharla Bharath Kumar[4]
Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM University, Kattankulathur-603203
E-mail: [email protected], [email protected],
[email protected], [email protected].
ABSTRACT
Natural fibers are excessively occurred in nature as they are one of the renewable products. From
these natural fibers we can get high performance with more strength composite materials. This
will reduce the usage of synthetic materials and give eco friendly environment[1]
. Now a day’s
composites place a crucial role in day to day engineering applications. These polyester based
composites give good dimensions and mechanical properties[2]
. So our aim is make a composite
material with Bio-degradable (Natural) material such as bamboo fiber with polyester as a
reinforced material in the matrix phase and in addition with graphite as filler material to study its
mechanical behavior[3]
. Graphene is a widely available economical reinforcement material with
high stiffness, high modulus, high strength and high theoretical efficiency[4]
. In this project we
use a hand layup method to fabricate the composite material. These fibrous materials have good
stiffness and strength for mechanical applications. Reinforced material is a boon in the sense that
it uses shorter lead times and tooling cost is considerably cheaper[5]
. The filler material is used in
different composition to find variations in bonding properties. With this fabricated material we
can test its mechanical properties such as tensile, flexural, vibration and also its tribological
behavior in dry condition by using pin-on-disc apparatus[6]
. For the above tests the American
society for testing and material (ASTM) standards were used[7]
.
KEY WORDS: Bamboo fibre, Methyl Ethyl Ketone Peroxide (MEKP), Cobalt Oxide,
polyester, Reinforced Composites, polymer matrix.
INTRODUCTION:
International Journal of Pure and Applied MathematicsVolume 119 No. 7 2018, 989-1000ISSN: 1311-8080 (printed version); ISSN: 1314-3395 (on-line version)url: http://www.ijpam.euSpecial Issue ijpam.eu
989
In the last two decades, there has been resurgence in renewable alternatives to petrochemical
based materials. Another approach that has also seen a significant effort has been the
development of natural fiber composites. These are usually materials made by mixing naturally
grown fibers and polymers in different ways. There has been a significant effort in this area as
well driven by a need to provide higher value products to agriculturalists. whereas graphene is a
form of carbon consisting of planar sheets which are one atom thick, with the atoms arranged in
a honeycomb-shaped lattice .Properties of Graphene are Another graphene’s stand-out properties
is its inherent strength. Graphene is the strongest material ever discovered, with an ultimate
tensile strength of 130,000,000,000 Pascal's (or 130 gigapascals), compared to 400,000,000 for
A36 structural steel, or 375,700,000 for Aramid.
FABRICATION PROCESS:
Step-1 Step-2 Step-3
Step-6 Step-5 Step-4
Figure 1: Fabrication Process
The above Flow chart shows the fabrication of the composite material.
Step 1: 300 grams of polyester resin was weighed in a beaker.
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
990
Step 2: 5% of polyester weight that is 15 grams of graphene was weighed using weighing
machine.
Step 3: Setting up stir casting machine along with stirrer. The rpm was set to 450 and the
process takes 4 Hrs for equal distribution of filler into the polyester resin.
Step-4: Wax was applied to the polythene sheet and this sheet was placed on wooden plank.
Step-5: Then Resin was applied as first coat to the sheet and bamboo fabric was placed on the coated
polyester before it get hardened.
Step-6: Then we applied polyester mixture to the first layer and place the second fabric on the
other like sandwiched.
Repeat the same until we get a thickness of 4mm.
The above process is repeated for different composites of filler i.e 10%,15%,20% of
graphene and four different mould are fabricated.
Table 1: Combination of Graphene for preparation of composite materials
SAMPLE COMPOSITION OF PLATE
0% Graphene 300gms polyester+0gms Graphene+ Bamboo fibre
5% Graphene 300gms polyester+15gms Graphene+ Bamboo fibre
10% Graphene 300gms polyester+30gms Graphene+ Bamboo fibre
15% Graphene 300gms polyester+45gms Graphene+ Bamboo fibre
20% Graphene 300gms polyester+60gms Graphene+ Bamboo fibre
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
991
Figure 2: Fabricated Composite Material
EXPERIMENTAL PROCEDURE:
Cutting the test specimen to as per ASTM Standards:
A wire hacksaw blade is used to cut each laminate into smaller pieces, for various experiments:
Tensile test- Sample is cut into 250x25x4 mm (ASTM 3039).
Flexural test specimen was cut into 150x30x4 mm (ASTM D 790)
TENSILE TEST:
The tensile was done by using universal Testing Machine (UTM).
We performed tensile test for 3samples for each composition of the composite material and we
took mean values for better accuracy. The following are the values obtained from these test.
Table 2: Tensile Test Values
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
992
S.no Graphene % specimen
Load at
yeild
(KN)
Elongatio
n of yeild
(mm)
Yeild
stress
(N/mm^2
)
Load at
peak
(KN)
Tensile
strength
(N/mm^2
)1 1 1.72 5.19 21.529 2.36 29.539
2 2 1.74 5.13 22.16 2.44 31.075
3 3 1.98 5.29 22.826 2.32 26.746
4 Mean 1.813 5.203 22.171 2.37 29.12
5 1 1.6 5.14 19.464 2.56 31.464
6 2 1.48 5.15 18.645 2.54 33.645
7 3 1.58 4.45 19.199 2.82 32.199
8 Mean 1.55 4.913 19.102 2.66 32.49
9 1 2.12 7.92 25.481 2.66 35.48
10 2 2.28 7.19 27.5 2.44 35.5
11 3 2.18 6.7 27.645 2.34 35.24
12 Mean 2.19 6.4 26.875 2.48 34.358
13 1 2.14 5.23 26.349 2.48 33.349
14 2 1.8 4.47 22.431 2.3 32.431
15 3 2.02 5.04 26.142 2.82 32.142
16 Mean 1.984 4.913 24.974 2.533 33.877
17 1 2.26 4.96 26.475 2.44 28.584
18 2 1.94 4.57 22.489 2.46 28.517
19 3 1.32 2.13 15.615 2.14 25.315
20 Mean 1.84 3.88 21.52 2.34 35.472
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
Figure 3: Tensile Test Specimens Figure 4: Tensile Test Specimens
(Beefore Test) (After Test)
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
993
Figure 5 : Graphical Representation of Tensile test values
Tensile test is done on our specimen according to ASTM standards of (250x25x4). After
doing test we found that Tensile strength is more for 20% graphene has highest tensile stress
with 35.472 N/mm2, nextly 10% graphene has tensile stress with 34.358N/mm
2 and we also
found that 0% graphene has least tensile strength with 29.12 N/mm2 .
FLEXURAL TEST:
The Flexural test was done using Universal Testing machine (UTM).
We performed flexural test on three samples for each composition of the composite material
and we took mean from that for better and accuracy results.
Table 3: Flexural test Values
29.1232.49
34.358 33.877 35.472
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0% Graphene 5% Graphene 10% Graphene 15% Graphene 20% GrapheneTen
sile
st
ren
gth
N/m
m2
Bamboo + Polyester + Garaphene filler %
Tensile strength N/mm^2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
994
S.noGraphene
%
Specimen
Number
Load at
Peak(K
N)
C.H Travel
Head(mm)
Transverse
Strength
(N/mm^2)
1 1 0.12 18.54 99.86
2 2 0.245 18.62 98.64
3 3 0.146 18.52 98.72
4 Mean 0.125 18.485 99.059
5 1 5.73 18.63 97.1
6 2 5.62 19.25 124.62
7 3 5.94 16.2 86.72
8 Mean 5.79 17.62 102.81
9 1 0.8 14.96 52.079
10 2 0.71 14.27 56.37
11 3 0.11 14.18 54.89
12 Mean 0.9 14.47 164.7
13 1 0.12 12.64 119.837
14 2 0.23 12.35 201.612
15 3 0.13 15.13 120.703
16 Mean 0.15 13.373 147.384
17 1 0.72 17.52 474.48
18 2 0.18 12.89 113.92
19 3 0.47 23.76 348.8
20 Mean 0.456 18.056 324.45
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
995
Figure 5: Flexural Test Specimen Figure 6: Flexural Test Specimen
(Before Test) (After Test)
Figure 7: Graphical Representation of Flexural Test Values
Flexural test is done on our specimen according to ASTM standards (150x30x4) mm. After
doing test we found that Transverse strength is more for 20% Grapheme has highest Transverse
strength with 324.45 N/mm2
, next 10% graphene has Transverse strength with 164.7 N/mm2
and we also found that 0% graphene has least tensile strength with 99.059 N/mm2.
Water Absorption Test:
Water absorption test is done on our specimen according to ASTM standards. After doing the
test we can say that the more amount of graphene material consumes less water. The factors that
affect water absorption test are the type of specimen, temperature and the material we had added
in it. The amount of water absorbed is calculated by using the formulae as below.
99.06 102.81
164.7147.384
324.456
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
0% Graphene 5% Graphene 10% Graphene 15% Graphene 20% Graphene
Tra
nsv
erse
tes
t N
/mm
2
Transverse strength N/mm^2
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
996
𝑾 =𝐌𝟐−𝐌𝟏
𝐌𝟏 x 100
Here M1 indicates the initial mass of the composite and M2 indicates the final mass of the
composite after water absorbed.
Table :4 Water Absorption
GRAPHENE
COMPOSTION
INITIAL
WEIGHT (M1)
FINAL
WEIGHT
(M2)
WATER
ABSORBED
PERCENTAGE
OF WATER
ABSORBED(%)
0% Graphene 14.538 15.296 0.782 5.37
5% Graphene 13.11 14.131 0.661 4.33
10% Graphene 13.141 13.931 0.590 3.77
15% Graphene 14.77 15.627 0.357 3.02
20% Graphene 17.291 17.825 0.234 1.96
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
997
Figure 8: Comparison between % of water absorbed and different Graphene Compositions
Conclusion:
At the end of all testing it is found that Graphene reinforced laminates providing better
mechanical properties like Tensile strength, Flexural strength. We found that the tensile is more
for 20% graphene and coming to the 0% graphene it gradually decreased and in the Flexural test
we got high value for 20% graphene and coming to the 0% we got least value. For water
absorption test water absorption percentage is gradually decreasing by increasing of amount
graphene percentage. Over all the values between 15% graphene and 20% graphene are
gradually decreasing. By seeing these the properties of the material will increase up to certain
range of adding of filler material and after that it will decrease.
5.37
4.33
3.77
3.02
1.96
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
0% Graphene
5% Graphene
10% Graphene
15% Graphene
20% Graphene
Per
centa
ge
%
Bamboo + Polyester + Graphene filler %
Percentage Of Water Absorbed
Percentage Of Water Absorbed
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
998
REFERENCE
[1] Vivek Kumar, Sanat Mohanty, “High Performance Moldable Bamboo Fiber-Epoxy
Composites” Indian Institute of Technology, Delhi, Inkilab Technologies Private Limited.page-1
[2] C.S. Verma, V.M. Chariar, AICTE, “Development Of Layered Laminate Bamboo
Composite And Their Mechanical Properties” Chanderlok Building, Janpath, New Delhi,
India.Volume-43 issue-3
[3] Manuela Cano, Umar Kahn, Toby Sainsbury, et al, “Improving The Mechanical
Properties Of Graphene Oxide Based Materials By Covalent Attachment Of Polymer
Chains’’ Instituto De Carboquimica Icb-Csic, C/Miguel Lusma Castan 4. E-50018 Zaragoza,
Spain Centre Of Research on Adaptive Nanostructures and Nano devices(CRANN) School Of
Physics Trinity College Dublin, Ireland.Volume-52
[4] William Slocumb, “Bamboo Fiber Reinforced Composites for Prosthetics and Orthotics”
Department of Bio Medical, Chemical and Materials Engineering.
[5] N.Saba, M.Jawaid, Othman Y. Alothman, M.T.Paridah “A Review On Dynamic
Mechanical Properties Of Natural Fiber Reinforced Polymer Composites” Biocomposite
Technology Laboratory, Institution Of Tropical Forestry And Forest Products(INTROP),
University Putra Malaysia, 43400 Upm Serdang, Selangor, Malaysia Chemical Engineering
Department, College Of Engineering, King Saud University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.Volume-106
[6] Karen Davis(MSc) “Material Review: Alumina (Al2O3) “Student Of PHd In Chemical
Engineering At The School Of Doctoral Studies Of The EU Square De Meeus 37-4th
Floor 1000
Brussels, Belgium.Volume-74
[7] M.Bagci, H.Imrek and Omari M. Khalfan “Effects Of Silicon Oxide Filler Material A nd
Fibre Orientation On Erosive Wear Of GF/EP Composites”.Volume-65
[8] Dr.-Ing.Dipl.-Chem, Ulrich Riedel, Dip.-Ing.J^rg Nickel Institute “Applications of
Natural Fiber Composites for Constructive Parts in Aerospace, Automobiles, And Other
Areas”.Volume-45
International Journal of Pure and Applied Mathematics Special Issue
999
1000