61
Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila

Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

  • View
    219

  • Download
    1

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Mechanics of Materials II

UET, Taxila

Page 2: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

References:

1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

ISBN: 9780138561130 2- Mechanics of materials (An

Introduction to the Mechanics of Elastic And Plastic Deformation of Solids andStructural Materials, E. J. Hearn,Butterworth (1997) ISBN 0750632658

Page 3: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

How Materials Carry Load Basic modes of loading a material are:

Tension, compression and shear

Page 4: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Tension Compression Shear

Page 5: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Definition of Stress:

 Loads applied on a material which are distributed over a surface.

Page 6: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

For example, the point load shown in the following figure might actually be a uniformly distributed load that has been replaced by its equivalent point load.

Page 7: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

P

A

Page 8: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Another Definition of stress

Stress is the load applied per unit area of the surface it is applied on.

Page 9: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Normal stressNormal stress is the stress normal to a surface and is denoted by the symbol "σ" (sigma). In the above figure the normal stress is uniform over the surface of the bar and is given by: 

Page 10: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Normal Stress Equation

A

P

Where:

P is the normal load &

A is the area

Page 11: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Shear Stress

Shear stress is the stress tangent to a surface.

 

Page 12: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

If in the following figure the shear stress (tau) that results in the shear load V is uniformly distributed over the surface, then the shear stress can be calculated by dividing the shear force by the area it is applied on.

Page 13: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Shear Stress Equation

A

V

Where:

V is the shear load &

A is the area

Page 14: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

V

A

Page 15: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Units of StressesThe units of stress are the units of load divided by the units of area.

Page 16: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

In the SI system the unit of stress is "Pa"

and in the U.S. system it is "Psi".

Pa and Psi are related to the basic units through following relations:

Page 17: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Pa & Psi Equations

KsiPsiin

lbPsi

MPaPam

NPa

1101

11

1101

11

32

62

 

Page 18: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Pressure gauge (Same units as stress)

Page 19: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Conversion

1 Pa = 145.04×10−6 psi

Page 20: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Basic modes of deformation

Basic modes of deformation of a material are:

Extension, Contraction & shearing

Page 21: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Material element can be extended, compressed, or sheared. The following figure shows how the square section to the left changes its shape during extension, contraction and shearing.

Page 22: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Extension Contraction Shearing

Page 23: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Definition of Strain:

Strain is the way engineers represent the distortion of a body.

Page 24: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Another definition

strain is the geometrical expression of deformation caused by the action of stress on a physical body.

Page 25: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Axial strainAxial strain (normal strain) in a bar is a measure of the extension of a bar per unit length of the bar before deformation.

Page 26: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The following figure shows a bar of initial length “lo” that is extended by the application of a load to the length “l”.

Page 27: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Representation of strain

lo

l

Page 28: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Axial StrainThe axial strain, denoted by (epsilon), in a homogeneously deforming bar is calculated by dividing the amount the bar extends by its initial length.  

Page 29: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Strain EquationThis yield the equation:

l

ll

Page 30: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Positive and negative strains

A positive axial strain represents extension and a negative axial strain represents a contraction. Strain has no units since it is one length divided by another length.

 

Page 31: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Shear Strain

Shear strain, denoted by “” (gamma), is a measure of how the angle between orthogonal lines drawn on an un-deformed body changes with deformation.

In the following figure the square has been sheared into a parallelogram.

Page 32: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Shear Strain

1

h

u

Page 33: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Equation of Shear Strain

The shear strain is calculated from the equation:

h

u

Page 34: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

As can be seen from the following figure, the shear strain is equal to the tangent of the change in angle or the two orthogonal sides.

h

u

Page 35: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Another Equation of shear strain

h

u )tan(

Page 36: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The difference between and θ becomes less and less as the angle θ (in radians) becomes small.

This is since the tangent of an angle, given in radians, can be approximated by the angle for small values of the angle.

Page 37: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

In most structural materials, the shearing is small and we can use the approximation

 1 for

Page 38: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Tensile behavior of different materials:

In a typical tensile test one tries to induce uniform extension of the gage section of a tensile specimen.

Page 39: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The gage section of the tensile specimen is normally of uniform rectangular or circular cross-section.

The following figure shows a typical dog-bone sample.

Page 40: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Gage length

P

P

P

P

Page 41: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The two ends are used for fixing into the grips, which apply the load. As can be seen from the free-body diagram to the right, the load in the gage section is the same as the load applied by the grips.

Page 42: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Using extensometers to measure the change of length in the gage section and a load cells to measure the load applied by the grips on the sample one calculates the axial strain and normal stress (knowing the initial gage length and cross-sectional area of the gage section).

Page 43: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The result is a stress-strain diagram, a diagram of how stress is changing in the sample as a function of the strain for the given loading. A typical stress-strain diagram for a mild steel is shown below.

Page 44: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Mild Steel Stress-Strain Curve

Yield stress, y

Ultimate stress, u

Stress,

Strain,

Page 45: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The different regions of the area response denoted by their characteristics as follows

Yield stress, y

Ultimate stress, u

Stress,

Strain,

1 2

3 4 5

1. Linear elastic: region of proportional elastic loading 2. Nonlinear elastic: up to yield 3. Perfect plasticity: plastic flow at constant load 4. Strain hardening: plastic flow with the increase of stress 5. Necking: localization of deformation and rupture

Page 46: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Brittle versus Ductile behavior

Brittle materials fail at small strains and in tension. Examples of such materials are glass, cast iron, and ceramics. Ductile materials fail at large strains and in shear. Examples of ductile materials are mild steel, aluminum and rubber.

Page 47: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The ductility of a material is characterized by the strain at which the material fails. An alternate measure is the percent reduction in cross-sectional area at failure.

Page 48: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Different types of response:

Elastic response:   If the loading and unloading stress-

strain plot overlap each other the response is elastic.

The response of steel below the yield stress is considered to be elastic.

Page 49: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Elastic Response (Linear & Non-linear)

Linear Elastic

Nonlinear Elastic

Page 50: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

After loading beyond the yield point, the material no longer unloads along the loading path. There is a permanent stretch in the sample after unloading.

Page 51: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

The strain associated with this permanent extension is called the

plastic strain “p” (on the figure).

Page 52: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

As shown in the figure, the unloading path is parallel to the initial linear elastic loading path.

Page 53: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Unloading

Loading

p

Page 54: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Most plastics when loaded continue to deform over time even without increasing the load. This continues extension under constant load referred to as creep.

If held at constant strain, the load required to hold the strain decreases with time.

Page 55: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Relaxation

The decrease in load over time at constant stretch is referred to as relaxation.

 

Page 56: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Bearing Stress:

Bearing stress is not a fundamental type of stress, however, it is a useful concept for the design of connections in which one part pushes against another.

The compressive load divided by a characteristic area perpendicular to it yields the bearing stress which is

denoted by “σb“.  

Page 57: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Therefore, in form, the bearing stress is no different from the compressive axial

stress and is given by

A

Fb

Page 58: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Where: F is the compressive load and A is a characteristic area perpendicular

to it. 

Page 59: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

F

p

F

F

F

F F

F

F

d

t

t

t t

Cylindrical bolt or rivet

Page 60: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

For example, if two plates are connected by a bolt or rivet as shown, each plate pushes against the side of the bolt with load F. It is not clear what the contact area between the bolt and the plate is since it depends on the size of the bolt and the shape of the deformation that results.

Page 61: Mechanics of Materials II UET, Taxila. References: 1- Strength and fracture of engineering solids. David K. Felbeck & A. G. Atkins, Prentice Hall (1995)

Also, the distribution of the load on the bolt varies from point to point, but as a first approximation one can use the shown rectangle of area (A=td) to get a representative bearing stress for the bolt as 

td

Fb