MECHANISTIC THIN KINt,

MECHANISTIc THINKING AS THE ORIGINAL SIN

By R. H. A'rXiN

Today men are alarve all elrc mel:baniu, and sa they accept and ithey two typem of "experta," the politicion and the aientist. It numera not whether thc scientiat multa pills ar atum bombo. lhe mo-called intellecitud is jun as atuceptible a" thc manual laborer ao that there have resulted ays• tema cif mechaniatic thought. The auprerne example of this ia cif coutar adoce. which has }lpaca at the top of the *cale. Phyaice is not, thercforc, peculiar to a particular human type, altining above leis fortunate mortais, but i* merely the exprciaion rd the general state aí mind—rhe nistic :tate of mind—of the burilar% rate. What that is wrong with ti Neariy everything Is wrong with ir, and it all amotinei tu the faca that we ice before tia a would on the hrink of aelf.annihilation, where adente ia once more in the forefront of the hattle, and the accumulared result nf centurieri of blind and fearful thinking SIIOWO itself in the present.day extrema nf melf-indulgencem, prumiticuitica and prostitutions of all de-scriptiona.

The whole pracess lias hem seen clearly by H. G. Wella in latem hook called MiNn AT rfri Eu» ar ITA tiús hook hc Leila how he has atrived at the 1..oncluaion that the evolunticiary proveis ia diverging from the secular. He therefore dane* bis provam" idealiam in which he 'um to ser a ncw "mcientific man" riu' from the abai of a hurnt-out civilizotion. Now he expresses the view that the mind aí man is no lungcr inale tu cope with hia world. The unly cure, he man would br tt new and improbahle man who would no longa. be "human."

Now Welia would have us think that this is a sudden thing, but I am nos prepared to accepi thia, he n* inclined to believe that the diverging palitas is bui the storldenly-spraresst conditiun of mana evulutionary ature. fia oursgi ha* eletu-ly undergane a decided modification in ias processes of rhought, and he himmelf lota believed implititly in cach new transition. Ai religiitua bebe( and explattation failetl to *uive his Nublem, the ;nublem uf happy living, he turated to experimental 'ciente. It is no! 'hen surpriaing that he ahould have been Mc to dcvelup a certain mudei power avir his

•

R. H. A VKIN

MECHAN1STIC

9?

externai world. hut 11~ we can ice that noi only ha; hie new seietur failtd

tu solve: hit prohlem but, worze xtill, hai put within bis handi a tapiti marna* of extinction which, hy hit obvionaly erronenus method of think•

toei he will probahly use. Let t>i itaw canudo- chia ornem of thought called :ciente, and ler ti,

'size phyates in particular, This ia the "purea" of the acienees, anil first rhing that atrikes one ia that it ia alto the mau triathernatical, Now mathernatics is purely a game of reavia, ai the Greeki fully recognised and ti really the nnly rrur expreasion of hurnan reationing wc have, i! cannot, ilierefore, aecept responaibility for what pliyaica does, because physicird fcedi the ao.calird "known" to the inathernatician, who the',

rertiros the com-lustrais to the phyticiati. ff then the conclusions he wrong wr moo Mame the "known" rather thai, the human reason. If rht "known" deviares at ali from the complete picturc of the world, 'hen

thrtnigh a aceira nf dependent 'knowns," we from a cak-Ánii•

accurnulation t,f deviations, and wr dual fina! that we require more com Orate(' therities and theritfarr more rnothernatíca tn explain h ali away

Phystcal thenries would then becorrie mane and more famanic and mathr-inarkally rompliciated. Thix rx preciaely what hat happened,

The foreflont oí phyairit totlay ta atarnit. To explain the whulc univcrac. phyinciati decides¡ that nuitter veio ta contam aí moleculea ta concriar nf ~n.o to cot-miar rt1 rirerrons and protons (tviu "typei" nf electricity). Tuday ir amuas aí electrons, prontos, poRitrons, neutroni, metiam, fleti'

trino& and perhapt even more, nese digerem paniclei are olstained within a mechaniatic pattern consiating of rwo J1 and modero tir

quainum). Thc c.latalicul ar mechaniatic:illy phylieul ',lauto was the first

ti afligir, as wr would e7 pcvt. Qn thia view the electrona and puniria were diaeovered and explarted iis charged "panicin of electricity" to tiecount tio the variou& plientiniena of diacharge aiei. Hena the murara atui Gbarges of these por, i-lett were olstained by clasuical methoda. When tiia.

usual rathations á:tineta-cri, á was, and is, the habit tu estrile the-rn w nrw and differein "punido" Wiltiãe macaca and :laurgx-ii uiuld be determined

relativo to the elettrou and prolon. Now wr numa nus try to 4.-ognplain of any rewtoming which is Impilo:ir

In thCRC would lie uri olaviouti philuatiphical errar-- foi.

acccpting the "knuwns," wz inume ao:cot the couelutiona th.it nuthrnnatto draws from them, h le, bowever, interesthig tu ice what lactem of

phantaty the seientifie process leadi w. G'Jnaider the use ri the flauteiam),

In itudying fkray 'paira for vartutig radia-active tuhatancei, ti WILI found by Rutherfeird and Chadwitk that they conaisted of "line" spectra, dite, Rutherford ihowed, to the tarei of aecondary demora eirmition within the atum. tagether wirh confirmou" epectra which 'rever! in each case ai a general background. lhe MC1111 energy aí the continuou* :pec. [rum then pointed to the necriiity for a continuou' enetgy electron emission from the nucieui.

Now the field rd srudy cif the atum- nucleus had of nereasity, via Bohr and 'ater Dirac, required the general system of quantLm theuty for ha explanation, Titia mec.hanittically marhernaried picrure, eito known ai wave inechanics, ponulates the exiitenee of electron and nuclear "ipirri," ar angulai' rnoincnta, anel for ?lis particular problem nf enn-rinnous p-ray 'pedra wc note that wavc.rnechanics givei a nuclear spin

uf„ h (n atnini with odd atotnic weights, where n 7=1 1,2.3, .

,,nd "h" ia Plantk's universal conotam, Thc p-paáick, like ali 'cetraria,

lias it irmo ai (1/2 )— h and whcn it traves au odd atutdic weight hodeuti, 3n die :nomeie weight remains add. (We inuld ¡lar as well have taken the atotnit wcight w bc rven). Ti ii, therefore, requires that

(rt 1- %)—(á

(04 R. 1-1. ATKIN MECHANISTIC "I IIINKING iaxs

w

physiesets ate keen to observe that wave mechanica is merdy a matheman cal repreternation uf a destacai electron, otherwitie they muld not claltri know what they are talkirtg about. It ia worthy of note that chis rnathe• mancai inference gires a bati( tule known as Heitenberg't uncertainty principk. Thia tens os that we cannot gire quantifica "sharp relute" any

more, hut that tf we know the condition of. say, an electron (ite mo-

mentum) at charp, then ias ponho, in space can anly he known as an

undrrp value. Hence wr are that we end up hy not knowing anything,

which tn my mind há a very good argument for us to have never known

anything in the fitar piare. Physice haa becorne a *ciente of probabilities and Gradadas] distributinns, and wal the tcientists then never ice that ali they are doing ie juktgling with the Md equation if o = o One of tht grau jokea of mechanietic acience is the "mindittiff" inferred hy the writinge of Fald;ngton and Jeans. li is in fact nothing but the residi cif tios "tinknowdhle" state ai physice with mystical trimmings. C)n the odiei nand, une could eatily interpret it as orgone, which would not only he the rnind-stuff, but ~da alio expiai» ira existence.

Thia state of ecience minta directly to the fact that the "knowns" are ineornplcte sio that, as we have ohterved, the aecutriulated deviations from the true picture of the univertie are tending the scientiste riff along ar; infinito tangem. Men muar either ser thia rlearly and honestly and tt ,„ tu do iiiirnething dbout it, ter elsk, thry will tnuddle aleing further awa% From real life and thernse:.,!. evcn life hy their uneompre

hended aciensific ptcturc. The above ia fui ther brought out by philosophical considerations. Proli

ably the leading philtalopher of uur time in chis aplico ie Bettlaud Russell. His method of inquiry, particularly in relation to science, has led bitu ti, strees the irnpornince of "perception." I'his he regarda as havia); a phyeital causado», and the 'troceme• of pereeving is then a causal dum between tk< physical and the mental, Porteou asa source of ktsowkdge uf physical objecta depend therefore ;aproo (1) 0 reliable 'dation between the iws.

ceiving apparatus and the physical causal chains, and (a) Int independenur bctween the V3rtatts causal cheins conatitining the pertepts. It is rica( lha! condirion (a) is in nu way complete and Une actual knowledge ut physikal objecte can nvver be atire. C.ondition (1) meiam that percepta ptubahly differ gready from physical reality. and hal beca allowed for by regurding ecience as giving a mure' uf the universe.

To the tittettiOn as tu wiarther ar not pitysice can be troe, we rato [ha rr

lote only decide that there ia no :ration for believing it can. Phyeica then mut he regarded as a succeiaiun of escuses to explain away the approxi• metiam of the initial pereepts (doe to the lack uf independence hetween the causal (Mina) upon which it ia based. Now thia ia really an extension rsf what we have already observed about the "knowns" ai 'ciem:e, and it is dar that the unreality (by which ia meant, of munge, the unreality ou untruth of the pieture) of Beirute finda ira caule in the "perception," or the "known."

What, now, if we could poseibly develap a ecienre which center' round the pruceee of perceptiun, i.e., the observer? We ehould dam, ao ali these considerations, stand a much greater chance of finding real meaning in tile ~Id. Such a "hreak,out" could conceivably anly carne through the ruim of non•metapsychoksical psychology, and thia, 1 feri, ia what &adi finda himself

Reich, then, 1 feri, is developing a new acientific, procriai: une which nana íman the oherrver. He himseif Iras pointed nus that the first miatake of the rnechanistic stientiett wat in ignoiing the eflect aí the acientimt, not only in the procen of observation, bui alio in the eubtequent procela of uiference and deduction.

Há work then atenda aut as that lasi itnprohrthle hope that Wella }ufa desired hut diacartled as impoesible. It conatitutee nothing lesa than a new procela of thinking, lonetwital as oppoacd to a merharsimic procrie.

It is alio dear, dum, that his work lu the field of biophymite with orgone rnergy muar itart from the very bottom. It Is not poasible to hutt imo the mechaniatic thearin aí phytice and eay, "thia phetiontenon is dum to orgone radiarion; thia ia whcre they have made 'heir mittakes," The efTecte can he sem ali alung the line, from the acciono of eleetrical currents in general, through the Mude idea of what elettricity really is, the field of heat and thermndynwmica, to the whule aphrre uf atotnie physics with ha preaent uncontrollable conclusiona. The new functional phytiea muar ratice de-veio!, itacli as a whnle and not in any pitxerneal "boronwing" tnanner.

Rui ler it be atrangly realized that Reitli'm work is num just another trience ciai will replace and ir: prove Upon the ',the, wien" it ia a new 'Vaiem of Mua ghs , a new prurirei alusether, and it ti virar bom what we liave alreatly that mana whole existem intui thange in line with it.

A recognition of tnechanistic processes expiai:te the continued failure of corduroy revolutionariee. All unwittingly they are eitting asa the ume branch they happen ta he eatvirtir 01f.

:1 •

a

100 R. H. ATK1N

The world ai art ha long hcen uumpletely distodated fmm that ta ,ciente, jun as religion baio been, but in actual tad we can ser them ali at cifrou to understand the univerte aí man. The ettlietic actue is surely norhing bua the sensation of living in the ume way as the only truz

religiouti experieni e ta that of the mystica. The rnajority cif the pairar experience neither the une nor the other, ia thcy go to the church for one and thc :mate% for the °cher. It is indeed signifieant that ali mysoics, from Christ and Gautarna Buddha to William Blake, Wordaworth, Keine, Int and Mahatma Gandhi, claim a similar experiente, namely, the sensation

of Atniverull !ove. The eathrtic tente gmong thc poets atnounts to the tune thing; the

ornar of itnity (ar heauty) which they feel, net think. That estheticiem, mytticiam. reli it what you will, has bera tracei by the poeta in ao attempt to understand themulves in ['tett relation to exiatence, just as sornce hai atiught to he the "reasaning" explanation. Both of them have failed beeauie aí mechanintit processei of thought, the ,cientista directly and thc poen indirectly. The period uf romantic poetry (with itt atraio) was the Iam vaio effort te understand the "sou!" Mure science really tnnk fuil pos :mien cif the mino!. The texuality of Keats, the freedom of Shelley, the. combination r,f thear twa iti Byron, ,ticid the nature•loving cú Wordaworth werr metely thc expression of the f,ietire for a) functiondl expianation

was theretore to be expected that the development ai inechanittic sciencc ahould have produced 3 more and more artificial "art" whnse main cry to for x "new inedium of expreuton." This ta norhing hitt ais admittion the (adure ta accept a functional prures' cif thinking. The medem art ha, therefurr 'tad, aí necesaity, ta betume more numa) in that it no langor attcmpt.a to deal with Iludi and blued hut tias hegun au extreme)), artificiai huainett, of vague and abismei metaphors in the realm of poetry, anda new latent "truth" in the realm of painting and aculpture. Thca.c are all attempti to escape twa dono. The fina i* a continued functional art which wouici have had to develop tii oppeatition tu sciences, (tom the rumando The tecond ia a purely neeeltaniatte art which it (tua) muat alwayt retea itt arder to ir. are. The residi is lhe focaria clay clama ai "modern verse' and lunatie pinauna.

A similar situation balda in parida' today. It is a aymptum aí mecha nista: thinking that tnen duna begin te luar ther individualio:i. The totalitarianism uf fascista_ is only paatihle breaute rneti's mirada are able to represe the runctional thinking aí individualiam and are preparai

101

accept the mounting hytteria of mechanietie processe*. Faikisin is a cliseate ai rnankind and nen uf any arte country. Whether tf be called communiam or derneeracy does no+ rnatter. Soon we shall ice a spreacling acroma the face uf the earth, and, itaelf an unhealthy tymptem cif precent-day thinking, it will hring the stupid elaughter aí thc milham in the unhealthiest 18m-t-uim of the lot, war,

h ia not juin coincidente that setena should produce atam bambe to be taed in worldwide ware, for the twa processes, war and seience, can never be independent. They can never be independent any more than a man's :rem can be independent of ha kg. They are both part of the ume body and hoth worked by the sane intichtnery, the brain; and se wars and sciencea, art, 'digitai and politica are et much a direct predita of matai' philatophy, or, talher, the prurem aí hit thinking, namely, mechanics,

The= new, imposeible "type" that \Veda visualizes is a new thinker who must fula understand these mechanics and the huge extent of their coa. tequences I believe that we have found thit in the functional thinking cif the work of Reich, which hal anawcred chis new and terribk pruhlem that we have all tomehow, and which Wctla has beco the first publiely to captem

Might i end by saying that it ia potsible that Rrich, bis work and bis ~kat, might not survive the present day holocauat of madneas. But d thcy cion't, then ntonkind will certainly perish, and the ipes scan laughing now.

1

Projeto Arte Org Redescobrindo e reinterpretando W. Reich Caro Leitor Infelizmente, no que se refere a orgonomia, seguir os passos de Wilhelm Reich e de sua equipe de investigadores é uma questão bastante difícil, polêmica e contraditória, cheia de diferentes interpretações que mais confundem do que ajudam. Por isto, nós decidimos trabalhar com o material bibliográfico presente nos microfilmes (Wilhelm Reich Collected Works Microfilms) em forma de PDF, disponibilizados por Eva Reich que já se encontra circulado pela internet, e que abarca o desenvolvimento da orgonomia de 1941 a 1957. Dividimos este “material” de acordo com as revistas publicadas pelo instituto de orgonomia do qual o Reich era o diretor. 01- International Journal of Sex Economy and Orgone Research (1942-1945). 02- Orgone Energy Bulletin (1949-1953) 03- CORE Cosmic Orgone Engineering (1954-1956) E logo dividimos estas revistas de acordo com seus artigos, apresentando-os de forma separada (em PDF), o que facilita a organizá-los por assunto ou temas. Assim, cada qual pode seguir o rumo de suas leituras de acordo com os temas de seu interesse. Todo o material estará disponível em inglês na nuvem e poderá ser acessado a partir de nossas páginas Web. Sendo que nosso intuito aqui é simplesmente divulgar a orgonomia, e as questões que a ela se refere, de acordo com o próprio Reich e seus colaboradores diretos relativos e restritos ao tempo e momento do próprio Reich. Quanto ao caminho e as postulações de cada um destes colaboradores depois da morte de Reich, já é uma questão que extrapola nossas possibilidades e nossos interesses. Sendo que aqui somente podemos ser responsáveis por nós mesmos e com muitas restrições. Alguns destes artigos, de acordo com nossas possiblidades e interesse, já estamos traduzindo. Não somos tradutores especializados e, portanto, pedimos a sua compreensão para possíveis erros que venham a encontrar.

2

Em nome da comunidade Arte Org. Textos da área do funcionalismo orgonômico Texts from the area of Orgonomic Functionalism. ---------------------- International Journal of Sex Economy and Orgone Research

----------------------- Orgonomic Functionalism ----------------------- 01 Theodore P.Wofe. The Sex-Economic Concept of Psychosomatic Indentity and Antithesis 1942 International Journal of Sex Economy and Orgone Research Volume 1 Number 1 1942 Interval 38-59 Pag. 33-54 02 Wilhelm Reich. Biophysical Functionalismo and Mechanistic Natural Science 1941 International Journal of Sex Economy and Orgone Research Volume 1 Number 2 1942 Interval 1-11 Pag. 97-107 03 Wilhelm Reich. Orgonotic Pulsation I 1944 International Journal of Sex Economy and Orgone Research Volume 3 Numbers 2 3 1944 Interval 1-54 Pag. 97-150 04 Wilhelm Reich. The Living Productive Power, Working Power of Karl Marx (1936) 1944 International Journal of Sex Economy and Orgone Research Volume 3 Numbers 2 3 1944 Interval 55-68 Pag. 151-164 05 R. H. Attkin. Mechanistic Thinking as the Original Sin 1947 McF 207 Annals of the Orgone Institute, Number 1. 1947 Interval 51-54 Pag. 95-101-------------------------------- -------------------------------- Orgone Energy Bulletin ------------------------------- -------------------------- Orgonomic Functionalism -------------------------- 01 Wilhelm Reich Cosmic Energy and Ether 1949 McF 302 Orgone Energy Bulletin, Vol. 1, No. 4. Oct. 1949 Interval 3-11 Pag. 143-159 02 Notes Editorial. Basic Natural-Scientific Research 1949

3

McF 302 Orgone Energy Bulletin, Vol. 1, No. 4. Oct. 1949 Interval 24-24 Pag. 184-185 03 Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism Parte II A 1947 McF 303 Orgone Energy Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 1. Jan. 1950 Interval 3-10 Pag. 1-15 04 Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism Parte II B 1947 McF 304 Orgone Energy Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 2. Apr. 1950 Interval 3-10 Pag. 49-62 05 Communications. Psychology and Natural Science 1950 McF 304 Orgone Energy Bulletin, Vol. 2, No. 2. Apr. 1950 Interval 23-24 Pag. 88-90 06 Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism Parte II C 1947 McF 305 Orgone Energy Bulletin. Vol. 2, No. 3. Jul. 1950 Interval 4-17 Pag. 99-123 07 Wilhelm Reich Orgonometrie Equations I A. General Form 1949 McF 306 Orgone Energy Bulletin. Vol. 2, No. 4. Oct. 1950 Interval 5-16 Pag. 161-183 08 Wilhelm Reich Orgonometrie Equations I B. Complete 1950 McF 308 Orgone Energy Bulletin. Vol. 3, No. 2. Apr. 1951 Interval 4-7 Pag. 65-71 09 R. H. Atkin. Mathematical Questiones Without Answers 1951 McF 308 Orgone Energy Bulletin. Vol. 3, No. 2. Apr. 1951 Interval 25-27 Pag. 106-110 10 Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism Parte II D 1947 McF 311 Orgone Energy Bulletin. Vol. 4, No. 1. Jan. 1952 Interval 2-8 Pag. 1-12 11 Charles R. Keller. Causality and Freedom A funcional Analysis 1952 McF 311 Orgone Energy Bulletin. Vol. 4, No. 1. Jan. 1952 Interval 20-23 Pag. 37-43 12 Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism Parte II E 1947 McF 314 Orgone Energy Bulletin. Vol. 4, No. 4. Oct. 1952 Interval 11-16 Pag. 186-196 ------------------------------- ------------------------------- -------------------- Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism ------------------- 01 Wilhelm Reich The Developmental History of Orgonomic Functionalism A 1946 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol I. I

4

Interval 6-20 Pag. 1-29 02 Wilhelm Reich The Biological Revolution from Homo Normalis to the Child of the Future 1950 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol I. I Interval 21-43 Pag. 30-74 03 Wilhelm Reich A Note on Sympathetic Understanding. Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol I. I Interval 43-47 Pag. 75-82 04 Wilhelm Reich The Silente Observer A 1952 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol I. I Interval 47-55 Pag. 83-99 05 Wilhelm Reich Functional Thinking 1950 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol I. I Interval 56-62 Pag. 100-112 06 Wilhelm Reich The Developmental History of Orgonomic Functionalism B 1946 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol II. II Interval 4-15 Pag. 1-23 07 Wilhelm Reich The Silente Observer B 1952 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol II. II Interval 16-20 Pag. 24-33 08 Wilhelm Reich Wrong Thinking Kills 1936 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol II. II Interval 21-25 Pag. 34-43 09 Wilhelm Reich On Using The Atomic Bomb 1945 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol II. II Interval 26-28 Pag. 44-49 10 Wilhelm Reich Mans Roots In Nature 1950 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol II. II Interval 29-41 Pag. 50-74 11 Wilhelm Reich The Developmental History of Orgonomic Functionalism C 1947 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol III. III Interval 4-13 Pag. 1-19 12 Wilhelm Reich Orgonotic Pulsation 1944 A Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol III. III Interval 14-35 Pag. 20-63 13 Wilhelm Reich The Evvasiveness of Homo Normalis 1947 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol III. III Interval 36-49 Pag. 64-91

5

14 Wilhelm Reich The Developmental History of Orgonomic Functionalism D 1947 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol IV. IV Interval 4-13 Pag. 1-18 15 Wilhelm Reich Orgonotic Pulsation 1944 B Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol IV. IV Interval 13-24 Pag. 19-40 16 Wilhelm Reich Orgone Functions in Weather Formation 1946 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol IV. IV Interval 24-29 Pag. 41-51 17 Wilhelm Reich The Attitude of Mechanistic Natural Science to the Life Problem 1941 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol IV. IV Interval 30-35 Pag. 52-63 18 Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism in Non-Living Nature A 1947 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol V. V Interval 4-13 Pag. 1-19 19 Wilhelm Reich Orgonotic Pulsation 1944 C Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol V. V Interval 14-26 Pag. 20-44 20 Wilhelm Reich Parents as Educators 1926 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol V. V Interval 26-37 Pag. 45-66 21 Wilhelm Reich Open Season on Truth 1942 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol V. V Interval 37-48 Pag. 67-88 22 Wilhelm Reich The Fundamental Problem of Form 1935 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol V. V Interval 48-48 Pag. 89-89 23 Wilhelm Reich Orgonomic Functionalism in Non-Living Nature B 1947 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol VI. VI Interval 4-14 Pag. 1-21 24 Wilhelm Reich Orgonotic Pulsation D 1944 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol VI. VI Interval 15-21 Pag. 22-35 25 Wilhelm Reich Desert Development and Emotional Dedness 1953 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol VI. VI Interval 22-29 Pag. 36-50

6

26 Wilhelm Reich Process Of Integration in the Newborn and the Schizophrenic 1950 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol VI. VI Interval 29-39 Pag. 51-71 27 Wilhelm Reich The Meaning of Disposition to Disease 1944 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol VI. VI Interval 40-41 Pag. 72-75 28 Wilhelm Reich The Difficulty 1948 Wilhelm Reich-Orgonomic Functionalism - Vol VI. VI Interval 42-42 Pag. 76-76 ----------------- -------------------------- --------- CORE. ----------------- -------------------------- Orgonomic Functionalism -------------------------- 01 Robert A. McCullough. Rocky Road Toward Functionalism 1955 McF 319 CORE. Vol. 7, No. 3,4. Dec. 1955 Interval 26-31 Pag. 144-154