Upload
others
View
0
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
New Hanover County Partnership Advisory Group
Meeting #15
June 18, 2020
22
Section Page Number
1. Welcome 3
2. Consideration of Pursuing a Partnership vs. Status Quo or Restructuring 4
3. Closed Session -
4. Closing Remarks 43
TABLE OF CONTENTS
3
WELCOME
4
CONSIDERATION OF PURSUING A
PARTNERSHIP VS. STATUS QUO OR
RESTRUCTURING
55
THE PARTNERSHIP ADVISORY GROUP HAS ENGAGED IN
SIGNIFICANT WORK OVER THE PAST 9 MONTHS
SUPPORTED BY A MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM OF NHRMC
AND COUNTY LEADERSHIP AND OUTSIDE ADVISORS
WHAT WE DID • UNDERSTOOD THE CHARGE AS AN ADVISORY GROUP TO THE NHRMC AND COUNTY BOARDS
• REVIEWED THE CURRENT HEALTHCARE LANDSCAPE AND NHRMC’S STRATEGIC OUTLOOK
• DEVELOPED THE GOALS AND OBJECTIVES FOR THE PARTNERSHIP EXPLORATION PROCESS
• ASSESSED THE FEASIBILITY OF NHRMC REMAINING STATUS QUO OR RESTRUCTURING
• REVIEWED PROPOSALS AND ENGAGED WITH RESPONDENTS TO ASSESS PARTNERSHIP OPTIONS
2 MEETINGS
21 COMMUNITY MEMBERS, NHRMC TRUSTEES,
PHYSICIANS, COUNTY AND NHRMC LEADERSHIPWHO WE ARE:
TO UNDERSTAND
NHRMC AND THE
INDUSTRY
TRANSITION IN
HEALTHCARE
TO DEFINE
GOALS AND
OBJECTIVES AND
DEVELOP AN RFP
TO UNDERSTAND
RESTRUCTURING
OPTION &
STRATEGIC
OUTLOOK
TO ASSESS THE
PROPOSALS
RECEIVED IN
RESPONSE TO
THE RFP
5 WORK
GROUPS
ASSESSING STATUS QUO,
RESTRUCTURING, AND
PARTNERSHIP
WITH THE RESPONDENTS
TO UNDERSTAND FIT AND
CONDUCT DUE DILIGENCE
12 SITE
VISITS
PUBLIC PRESENTATIONS
BY EACH RESPONDENT TO
THE PAG
TIME LISTENING TO THE
COMMUNITY, NHRMC
EMPLOYEES & PROVIDERS
4 MEETINGS 4 MEETINGS 4 MEETINGS
14 PAG Meetings over 9 MonthsAnd counting!
And Countless Hours Spent on Homework and Reading
Industry Articles and Information Shared by the Public
66
THIS PROCESS DATES BACK TO 2017 WITH THE
DEVELOPMENT OF NHRMC’S CURRENT STRATEGIC PLAN
Oct Nov Dec Jan Feb Mar Apr May JunNHRMC Board develops
and approves current
strategic plan with
focus on access, value,
and health equity
After fully vetting
option, NHRMC
BOT determines
SystemCo
restructuring
offers limited
value and
begins
partnership
discussion;
Works with
Commissioners
to establish
PAG
NHRMC Board identifies
structural and financial
barriers and begins
vetting SystemCo
restructuring
Lean facilitators ask NHRMC
BOT: What factors may inhibit
NHRMC’s ability to carry out,
enhance and sustain its
mission?
2017 2018 2019 2020
PAG understands
NHRMC current state
and healthcare industry
transformation
PAG understands
proposals and evaluates
value to NHRMC and
the community
PAG evaluates NHRMC
Strategic Outlook
including impact of
SystemCo
PAG develops
comprehensive Goals
and Objectives and
issues RFP
77
STEP 1: UNDERSTAND CURRENT STATE
What’s happening in
Wilmington and NHRMC’s 7-
County Service Area?
What challenges are faced by
NHRMC in today’s healthcare
landscape?
1. Reduced Reimbursement in an
Aging Population
2. Increasing Regulatory
Scrutiny
3. Payment Model Transition
to Value-Based Care
4. Shift from Inpatient to
Outpatient Care Settings
Projected County Population Growth (2017-2030)
Columbus
+0%
Duplin
-2%
Onslow +10%
Brunswick
+21%
Bladen
-6%
Pender
+16%
New
Hanover+15%
<10%NHRMC Inpatient
Capacity
NHRMC is influenced by national healthcare trends and shifting market dynamics
88
STEP 2: DEFINE OUR GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
The Goals and Objectives are specific actions required for NHRMC to achieve the
desired outcomes as stated through Guiding Principles. They serve as the basis
for the development of RFP questions and the criteria against which each
strategic option will be evaluated
A Request for Proposal (RFP) is a document to collect required information
from potential partners to enable evaluation of proposals against defined
partnership goals and objectives
The Guiding Principles serve as a framework of desired outcomes across key
dimensions (i.e. operational, clinical, etc.) to guide the partnership exploration
process
Our goal in this process is to better position NHRMC to achieve its strategic
plan
Strategic Plan
Goals and
Objectives
Request for
Proposal
Guiding
Principles
99
STEP 3: ASSESS THE STRATEGIC OUTLOOK
Strategic Outlook Factors Conclusion
Determine if NHRMC is positioned to achieve its
strategic plan
The combined implementation complexity and
financial demand of all strategic needs inhibits
NHRMC’s ability to optimally address each of
these demands at the required pace
Understand NHRMC’s legal organizational
structure
NHRMC has structural barriers to achieving its
strategic plan, adapting to healthcare industry
transformation, and achieving governance best
practices
Evaluate NHRMC’s long-range financial plan
and ability to fund capital needs
Funding the strategic plan would stress NHRMC’s
balance sheet potentially resulting in default on
bonds or downgrade in credit rating approaching
‘Baa’
Discuss alternative scenarios, such as tax payer
funding, to fund NHRMC’s capital needs while
maintaining current legal organizational structure
Tax support to fill existing financial gaps would
translate to a 21% increase in property tax rates;
up to 68% increase inclusive of potential threats
1010
STEP 4: UNDERSTAND PROS AND CONS OF PROPOSED
PARTNERSHIP MODELS
Pros and Cons based upon understanding of proposals received
Pros Cons
Joint Venture Full Integration Joint Venture Full Integration
Ownership
InterestMaintain ownership interest
Receive maximum
consideration and
commitments include fully
funding Strategic Plan
Lower amount of
consideration paid and
commitments made by
partner for partial ownership
Relinquish ownership
interest
Board Powers Maintain role in governance Maintain role in governanceSubject to partner “veto
rights / reserved powers”
Subject to parent reserved
powers
Board
AppointmentAppointment of directors to
governing board
Appointment of directors to
governing board
Partner gets appointments to
governing board
Partner has more limited role
in appointments
Capital
CommitmentPotential opportunity for
distributions
No further capital
commitments
Ongoing commitment to
contribute capital if required,
or risk dilution
Few, if any, opportunities to
participate in ongoing
distributions
Return on
InvestmentPotential future returns on
investment
Full ROI achieved at closing /
Maintain right of reversion /
No ongoing debt obligations
or downside risk
Responsibility for at least a
part of ongoing debt and
downside risk
Likely no participation in any
future returns
Organizational
DirectionAbility to influence strategy
Partner has full incentive to
invest / Retain ability to
influence strategy through
local board and parent board
appointments
Less incentive for partner to
prioritize investments in
venture
Reduced ability to control
strategy
1111
STEP 5: DEVELOP KEY PROPOSAL ELEMENTS (KPE) TO
EVALUATE OUR OPTIONS (1/2)
Goal & Objective Key Proposal ElementSummary Approach: Extent to which the
proposal addresses…
Improving Access to Care and Wellness
1. Expansion & Reconfiguration of
Facilities
Strategic Need(s): Expansion & Reconfiguration of
Facilities
2. Ambulatory Network Development Strategic Need(s): Ambulatory Network Development
3. Information Technology & Digital
Solutions
Strategic Need(s): Transparency; Consumer-Friendly
Technology; Telemedicine Adoption; Technology Platform
Advancing the Value of the Care 4. ACO and Health Plan Development Strategic Need(s): ACO and Health Plan Development
Achieving Health Equity 5. Full-Scale Health Equity ProgramStrategic Need(s): Full-Scale Health Equity Program;
Fulfills commitment to mission and serving all regardless of
ability to pay
Supporting our Staff
6. Avoiding Staff Shortages Strategic Need(s): Avoiding Staff Shortages
7. Developing and Recruiting Talent and
Expertise
Strategic Need(s): Developing and Recruiting Talent and
Expertise
Partnering with Providers
8. Provider Needs Strategic Need(s): Provider Needs
9. Engaging Independent Providers Strategic Need(s): Engaging Independent Providers
Driving Quality Care Throughout the
Continuum10. Clinical Transformation
Strategic Need(s): Evidenced-Based Protocols; Care
Coordination Across the Continuum
1212
STEP 5: DEVELOP KEY PROPOSAL ELEMENTS (KPE) TO
EVALUATE OUR OPTIONS (2/2)
Goal & Objective Key Proposal ElementSummary Approach: Extent to which the
proposal addresses…
Growing the Level and Scope of Care11. Partnerships for Highly-Specialized
Services
Strategic Need(s): Partnerships for Highly-Specialized
Services
Investing to Ensure the Long-Term
Financial Security
12. Financial performance benefitsStrategies to identify and capture synergies with potential
partner and preserve key existing financial drivers
13. Addressing financial gaps and threatsAbility to fund strategic plan to address NHRMC’s existing
financial gaps and potential threats
14. Total financial considerationTotal financial consideration commensurate to proposed
strategic partnership structure
Strategic Positioning 15. Integrated, Regional Health SystemStrategic Need(s): Integrated, Regional Health System;
Broader desire to positively impact region’s economic
status
Governance
16. Contemporary governance model Barrier(s) identified by NHRMC BOT: Diplomatic Hurdles
17. Control at the local levelPreservation of majority control of the organization at the
local level
18. Legal organizational modelBarrier(s) identified by NHRMC BOT: Growth Outside the
County; Branding Inflexibility; Financing Opportunity;
Investment Limitations; Scale Limitations
13
KEY PROPOSAL ELEMENTS
1414
KEY PROPOSAL ELEMENT OVERVIEW
• During PAG Meeting #10, the PAG developed Key Proposal Elements (KPEs) based upon NHRMC’s
strategic needs
• The KPEs were designed to facilitate the assessment of each proposal’s ability to meet NHRMC’s strategic
needs. Additionally, KPE assessments were completed for NHRMC Status Quo and NHRMC SystemCo
• The following slides present an aggregated view of the partnership option relative to NHRMC SystemCo
and NHRMC Status Quo
Please Note: The Partnership description does not represent any one proposal. Rather it represents,
based upon the proposals, site visits, presentations, and follow up inquiries and clarifications, what
the PAG understands to be available to NHRMC and the community by selecting a partner
1515
●Relative to other proposals received, this organization’s response addresses RFP questions related to this KPE in a compelling manner,
demonstrating (i) clarity of specific plans for NHRMC with qualitative and quantitative detail, (ii) clear qualifications demonstrating the ability
to deliver on those specific plans, and (iii) the willingness to be committed to the community to deliver those specific plans.
◕Relative to other proposals received, this organization’s response addresses RFP questions related to this KPE in a comprehensive manner,
providing a good level of explanation on (i) clarity of specific plans for NHRMC with qualitative and quantitative detail, (ii) clear qualifications
demonstrating the ability to deliver on those specific plans, and (iii) the willingness to be committed to the community to deliver those specific
plans.
◑Relative to other proposals received, this organization’s response addresses RFP questions related to this KPE in an adequate manner,
providing some but not enough explanation on (i) clarity of specific plans for NHRMC with qualitative and quantitative detail, (ii) clear
qualifications demonstrating the ability to deliver on those specific plans, and (iii) the willingness to be committed to the community to deliver
those specific plans.
◔Relative to other proposals received, this organization’s response does not address RFP questions related to this KPE in a clear manner,
lacking sufficient explanation on (i) clarity of specific plans for NHRMC with qualitative and quantitative detail, (ii) clear qualifications
demonstrating the ability to deliver on those specific plans, and (iii) the willingness to be committed to the community to deliver those specific
plans.
○ Relative to other proposals received, this organization’s response does not address RFP questions related to this KPE in a adequate
manner, lacking sufficient support for achieving the KPE.
N/A No response provided for this KPE.
KPE SUMMARY PROVIDES HARVEY BALL RATINGS BASED ON
THE FOLLOWING CRITERIA
1616
Key Proposal Elements Partnership
Driving Quality Care Throughout the Continuum
10. Clinical
Transformation ◕-● ◔ ◔Growing the Level and Scope of Care
11. Partnerships for
Highly-Specialized
Services◕-● ○ ○
Investing to Ensure the Long-Term Financial Security
12. Financial
Performance Benefits ◕-● N/A N/A
13. Addressing Financial
Gaps and Threats ◕-● ○ ◔14. Total Financial
Consideration ◑-● N/A N/A
Strategic Positioning
15. Integrated, Regional
Health System ◕-● ◔ ◔Governance
16. Contemporary
Governance Model ◔-◕ ○ ◔17. Control at the Local
Level ◕ ● ●18. Legal Organizational
Model ◑-◕ ○ ◑
Key Proposal Elements Partnership
Improving Access to Care and Wellness
1. Expansion &
Reconfiguration of
Facilities◕-● ◔ ◔
2. Ambulatory Network
Development ◕-● ◔ ◔3. Information
Technology ◑-● ◔ ◔Advancing the Value of the Care
4. ACO and Health Plan
Development ◕-● ◔ ◔Achieving Health Equity
5. Full-Scale Health
Equity Program ◕-● ◔ ◔Supporting our Staff
6. Avoiding Staff
Shortages ◕-● ◑ ◑7. Developing and
Recruiting Talent and
Expertise◕-● ◔ ◔
Partnering with Providers
8. Provider Needs ● ◔ ◔9. Engaging
Independent
Providers◑-● ◔ ◔
PARTNERSHIP VS. STATUS QUO OR RESTRUCTURINGKEY PROPOSAL ELEMENT SUMMARY & COMPARISON
1717
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE1. EXPANSION AND RECONFIGURATION OF FACILITIES
1. Expansion and Reconfiguration of Facilities
Partnership
◕-● ◔ ◔• Significant financial commitments enable
NHRMC to accelerate efforts to:
• Enhance the service lines to broaden
reach and care for additional
communities in southeastern North
Carolina
• Develop and upgrade the main
campus to expand tertiary/quaternary
capabilities
• Develop innovative and sustainable
health delivery models in rural
communities
• Partners offer advanced methodology to
identify where services are most needed and
the capital, scale and infrastructure to more
rapidly act on that information.
• NHRMC has implemented numerous
programs to improve care coordination to
better manage increasing volumes, including
use of real-time location tracking systems,
multidisciplinary rounding, & digital
standardization.
• NHRMC has had success in driving down
hospital utilization rates among existing
patients (e.g., 14% reduction in Medicare
admission rate).
• Focused efforts on reducing need for
hospital services are not able to keep pace
with increasing capacity demands.
• Long-term regional growth is expected to
continue to accelerate.
• NHRMC has evaluated existing facilities,
designed future-state recommendations,
developed a 10+-year implementation plan,
and determined capital requirement to
expand and reconfigure facilities. But capital
is not available to implement at the pace
needed.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model may
ease limitations on investing in facilities and
services outside New Hanover County, but
NHRMC would still be in the same financial
position, and would need access to
additional capital (this could be limited) in
order to pursue investments outside the
County
1818
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE2. AMBULATORY NETWORK DEVELOPMENT
2. Ambulatory Network Development
Partnership
◕-● ◔ ◔• Significant financial commitments would
enable NHRMC to add outpatient medical
services and practices in extended service
area, giving residents more convenient
access to care that helps them manage their
health.
• Robust ambulatory strategy
supported/funded by partnership would help
decompress main NHRMC campus, allowing
for more focused use for high-end services.
• Partners offer specific market-based plans
using advanced data analytics tools.
• Partners could support expansion of well-
established ambulatory networks that include
innovative approaches to care delivery,
including telemedicine and behavioral health.
• The growth of NHRMC’s ambulatory network
to meet projected growth in outpatient
volumes and provide more convenient,
affordable care options is restrained by
structural and capital limitations inherent in
existing structure. These include the ability to
invest in facilities outside New Hanover
County, where more than 50% of NHRMC
patients live.
• NHRMC has purchased land for the Scotts
Hill Campus and the Autumn Hall
expansions, but building these projects will
effectively consume all available capital,
preventing the ability to grow other services
for an extended period of time.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model may
ease limitations on investing in facilities and
services outside New Hanover County, but
NHRMC would still be in the same financial
position, and would need access to
additional capital (this could be limited) in
order to pursue investments outside the
County.
1919
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE3. INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY
3. Information Technology
Partnership
◑-● ◔ ◔• Partners offer scalable telehealth solutions
to increase access for patients throughout
the region.
• Partners provide access to consumer-centric
digital platforms including web scheduling,
online chats, and telephonic support for
patients.
• Partners offer real-time sophisticated
analytics capabilities.
• Partners commit to developing a command
center to service NHRMC.
• Site visit presentations highlighted strong IT
capabilities and infrastructure.
• Would need to work toward mature price
transparency tool with potential for
implementation at NHRMC.
• NHRMC offers MyChart patient portal and
NHRMC App.
• NHRMC has deployed limited telemedicine
capabilities (telehealth home care, E-visits,
telehealth connectivity at facilities).
• Plans to launch customer relationship
management (“CRM”) to improve
communications with patients on hold for
limited funding.
• Despite investment of $750 million in capital
investment and operating expenses over the
past 10 years (including Epic EMR
implementation), current technology platform
does not meet today’s needs given
increasing role and importance of analytics
and technology in healthcare delivery
• Recent addition of Health Catalyst to
analytics portfolio will support data
integration and robust analytics offerings
(~$1M/year investment), but more is needed
to fully deploy.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly improve NHRMC’s information
technology. Capabilities remain as status
quo.
2020
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE4. ACO AND HEALTH PLAN DEVELOPMENT
4. ACO and Health Plan Development
Partnership
◕-● ◔ ◔• Partners would provide access to shared
infrastructure and corporate services
(analytics, clinical solutions and
documentation excellence, safety and
regulatory accreditation) which would lower
cost of growing NHRMC’s ACO program to
serve more area residents.
• Partners would provide access to multi-
disciplinary, care management teams across
the continuum to offer area patients more
seamless access to care.
• Inclusion in larger, more mature Accountable
Care Organizations with additional covered
lives across payers (i.e. commercial,
Medicare) will lower costs reduce risks.
• Health plan and value-based contracting
experience can advance NHRMC strategy
• Partners offer Medicare Advantage programs
which could help growth of NHRMC’s new
Medicare Advantage product for area
retirees.
• NHRMC Medicare Shared Savings Program
ACO, Physician Quality Partners, has ~19K
covered lives and achieved a 95.12% quality
score and $282 reduction in cost per
beneficiary for the 2018 plan year
• NHRMC offers Medicare Advantage Health
Plan for residents of New Hanover County
• NHRMC processes to manage population
are largely manual and network of
participating providers is limited, creating
inefficiencies and limiting ability to scale up
to help improve quality and lower costs for
more area residents.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly improve NHRMC’s ACO and health
plan development capabilities. Capabilities
remain as status quo.
2121
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE5. FULL-SCALE HEALTH EQUITY PROGRAM
5. Full-Scale Health Equity Program
Partnership
◕-● ◔ ◔• All respondents demonstrated success in
addressing social determinants of health and
two of three respondents were recently
nationally recognized for their efforts in
Health Equity by receiving the CMS Health
Equity Award within the first three years of its
establishment.
• Respondents demonstrated success in
partnering with community organizations to
address social determinants of health and
have committed to continue existing NHRMC
programs.
• Respondents offer access to expertise,
frameworks, and data analytics to support
NHRMC health equity program, as well as
access to employee training and other
programs to ensure culturally competent
care.
• Respondents have well-established supplier
diversity initiatives
• Respondents have committed to continue or
improve NHRMC’s charity care program.
• Current NHRMC programs include Mission
Corps, Barbershop Initiative, Food
Pharmacy, Dancin’ in the Park programs,
community partnerships geared towards
addressing the opioid crisis and
homelessness as targeted social
determinants of health, and adding
community health workers in Northside
neighborhood.
• “Every Day” Bias training and employee
resource groups available to all employees.
• NHRMC offers Healthcare Explorers
program for youth.
• NHRMC is piloting standardized screenings
for social determinants of health, but there is
minimal use of data to identify opportunities
and measure effectiveness of programs.
• Without sophisticated data systems and
infrastructure, programs will remain limited in
scope and impact.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly impact or expand NHRMC’s health
equity program. Capabilities remain as status
quo
2222
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE6. AVOIDING STAFF SHORTAGES
6. Avoiding Staff Shortages
Partnership
◕-● ◑ ◑• Respondents propose building regional hub
of services, growing employment and
advancement opportunities.
• Respondents have indicated that all
employees in good standing will continue to
be employed in their current positions and
are committed to competitive market-based
benefits for NHRMC’s employee base to
minimize disruption.
• Prior employment and service with NHRMC
will be considered in full and partner will work
with NHRMC to develop a competitive
retirement savings program.
• Access to diversity-related resources and
programming will be expanded.
• Support for recruitment and retention
including specific nurse recruiting resources
could be enhanced through different
programs offered by the potential partners.
• NHRMC offers competitive salaries and
comprehensive benefits including generous
health coverage, childcare, wellness
programs and tuition assistance.
• NHRMC Will continue existing staffing and
compensation commitments as long as
economically feasible.
• NHRMC achieved Forbes Top 100 Large
Employers (2018 and 2019); Becker’s
Hospital Review 150 Top Places to Work in
Healthcare (2019).
• Partnership with Schools of Nursing and
national recruitment efforts support a growing
nurse pipeline.
• Existing NHRMC infrastructure may not be
sufficient to recruit staff to meet growing
demand in region while the industry faces a
shortage in healthcare workers.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly improve NHRMC’s staff job security,
benefits, or recruitment. Capabilities remain
as status quo.
2323
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE7. DEVELOPING AND RECRUITING TALENT AND EXPERTISE
7. Developing and Recruiting Talent and Expertise
Partnership
◕-● ◔ ◔• Respondents have system-level leadership
development; orientation & onboarding;
learning technology; more sophisticated
succession planning; onboarding, coaching,
and education;
• Leadership recruitment support
• Specific programs for developing nurse
leadership
• Location of a new shared-services center
and corporate department in Wilmington.
• NHRMC offers a formal leadership
development program developed and run by
current NHRMC employees (should have
nearly all Directors and above completed by
year-end).
• Current leadership is well-versed in
traditional healthcare services and recent
recruitment has included new expertise (i.e.,
clinical transformation and health plan
operations).
• To ensure clinician representation at all
levels and keep pace with new business
models and functions in healthcare,
additional expertise is needed.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly improve NHRMC’s ability to develop
and recruit talent and expertise. Capabilities
remain as status quo.
2424
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE8. PROVIDER NEEDS (1/2)
8. Provider Needs
Partnership
● ◔ ◔• Respondents have strong physician dyad
models and approach to provider
engagement
• Respondents offer more robust provider
resiliency programs which could be
expanded
• Local control and decision-making for
provider issues
• Networks in place for physician group
management.
• Support for the development of a NHRMC
Advance Practice Provider strategy
• Support for provider recruitment and
expanded reach into new recruiting pipelines
• Expansion of Graduate Medical Education
programming at NHRMC including
increasing residents in existing programs
and offering new residencies and fellowships
for physicians and other clinicians
• Status quo will continue existing medical
staff governance policies and procedures
• No disruption to employed physician group
management. The NHRMC / Atrium
Physician Network Management Agreement
would continue
• Recent success in provider recruiting
includes recruiting 42 providers in 2019 (21
MD and 21 APP) and 30 providers in 2018
(16 MD and 14 APP)
• Overall APP’s are ~1/3 of the NHRMC
provider workforce with expected expansion
of recruitment
• NHRMC achieved Joy in Medicine Bronze
Level Designation for NHRMC Physician
Group and developed and administered a
MiniZ provider burnout survey
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly improve NHRMC’s ability to support
provider needs. Capabilities remain as status
quo
Provider Needs Rating Rationale continued on subsequent page
2525
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE8. PROVIDER NEEDS (2/2)
8. Provider Needs
Partnership
● ◔ ◔• Clinician leadership development and
executive leadership development programs
• Support for and access to additional clinical
trials and research funding
• Augmentation of existing staff through virtual
consultation with in system specialists
• Continuation of current Medical Staff
Governance and related policies and
procedures subject to further due diligence
• Leadership roles for providers throughout
organizations
• Service line leadership structure supported
by physician dyad leadership program and
provider forums
• Research Finance Coordinator role and two
Cardiology Study Coordinator roles support
research at NHRMC
• Commercial IRB allows studies with IRB
approval at another site to be processed
locally
• See prior page
Provider Needs Rating Rationale continued from prior page
2626
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE9. ENGAGING INDEPENDENT PROVIDERS
9. Engaging Independent Providers
Partnership
◑-● ◔ ◔• No expected impact on existing and
developing hospital-based provider
contracts, joint ventures and other physician
contracts and agreements
• Expertise and support for various provider
alignment models including ACO / CIN
membership, shared investments and co-
management agreements
• Willingness to extend additional support to
independent providers including: EMR
connectivity, referral management
connectivity, technical consulting, analytics,
and a group purchasing organization
• Inclusion of independent providers in key
leadership roles throughout the organization
• Physician council enables communication
with independent providers
• Status quo would not impact existing and
developing hospital-based provider
contracts, joint ventures and other physician
contracts and agreements
• NHRMC offers affiliation for independent
providers through Physician Quality Partners
ACO
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly improve NHRMC’s ability to engage
independent providers. Capabilities remain
as status quo
2727
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE10. CLINICAL TRANSFORMATION
10. Clinical Transformation
Partnership
◕-● ◔ ◔• Expressed willingness to share best
practices from each organization and scale
to system
• Partners offer access to standardized quality
improvement approach and resources
including quality analytics and scorecard;
care redesign teams; participation in system-
wide quality and safety team
• Partners provide access to care
management and patient satisfaction
resources
• Inclusion in performance improvement
programs including access to preventive
guidelines, evidence based protocols and
safety initiatives
• Implementation of embedded workflow and
analytics and access to system-wide
innovation efforts
• Demonstrated success, through provider
testimonials, of arming providers with
actionable data
• NHRMC launched clinical transformation
programming with varying degrees of
adoption and designed future-state clinical
transformation initiative. Program build time
expected to be 3+ years
• In implemented programs, NHRMC has seen
success but number and scope of programs
are limited
• Current care coordination system is
fragmented with limited coordination across
the continuum; some programs exist and
there are ongoing efforts to increase
coordination
• Current care coordination initiatives include:
Chronic Case Management, Transitional
Case Management, outreach to high-risk
patients post discharge, Surgical Navigation
Center, and Dosher, Novant, and Columbus
clinical affiliation agreements
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly improve NHRMC’s ability to achieve
clinical transformation. Capabilities remain
as status quo.
2828
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE11. PARTNERSHIPS FOR HIGHLY-SPECIALIZED SERVICES
11. Partnerships for Highly-Specialized Services
Partnership
◕-● N/A N/A
• Respondents have nationally recognized
programs for specialized services, including
pediatrics, oncology, cardiac and vascular
care, which could be linked with NHRMC
programs to further advance care available
locally.
• Integration could facilitate timely and
coordinated transfers 24/7 via transfer center
connectivity
• 2-way communication between providers
and linked EMR to ensure the coordination of
care leaving the service area
• Partners offer commitment to grow
specialized services and access to clinical
trials locally by augmenting and supporting
existing capabilities with nationally
recognized clinical programs.
• NHRMC service area population will not
support certain highly-specialized services
• NHRMC has no current partnership to
ensure patient access and coordination to
those highly-specialized services not
supported by service area population
• Some informal relationships for higher levels
of care exist (i.e., pediatric subspecialists
from UNC-CH to supplement our providers)
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model will not
directly impact NHRMC’s partnerships for
highly-specialized services. Capabilities
remain as status quo
2929
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE12. FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE BENEFITS
12. Financial Performance Benefits
Partnership
◕ N/A N/A
• Respondents offer demonstrated experience
in identifying and achieving synergies
through partnership
• Partners provide comprehensive frameworks
for integration and achieving savings
• NHRMC could benefit from cost savings and
operational efficiencies through economies
of scale.
• Partners offer mature corporate service
offerings to augment existing back office
capabilities.
• Status Quo does not introduce new
operational and financial synergies.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model is not
expected to result in financial performance
benefits given (1) there is no new access to
corporate services, scale or other
operational/shared resources and
(2) limitations will remain in term of
NHRMC's investment portfolio. Therefore,
there are no expected operational and
financial synergies resulting from a
restructuring.
3030
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE13. ADDRESSING FINANCIAL GAPS AND THREATS
13. Addressing Financial Gaps and Threats
Partnership
◑-● N/A N/A
• All potential partners proposed significant
capital commitments to fund all or some of
NHRMC’s strategic plan.
• Demonstrated ability to fund capital
commitments at a lower cost of capital given
strong balance sheets and highest credit
rating category
• NHRMC’s capital capacity at its current
rating level is insufficient to fund the
community’s needs.
• NHRMC is limited to using debt capacity
within New Hanover County while the most
urgent need for more services and access to
medical care is outside the County.
• Funding shortfalls could require a tax
increase for New Hanover County citizens.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model adds
ability to more freely raise capital but does
not materially change NHRMC’s capital
capacity or short-term financial positioning at
its current rating level. SystemCo may be
able to use debt capacity outside the County.
• Funding shortfalls could require a tax
increase for New Hanover County citizens.
3131
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE14. TOTAL FINANCIAL CONSIDERATION
14. Total Financial Consideration
Partnership
◑-● N/A N/A
• All potential partners proposed significant
capital commitments to fund all or some of
NHRMC’s strategic plan for meeting the
healthcare needs of the region.
• All potential partners proposed significant
financial consideration to New Hanover
County.
• Combined capital commitment and financial
consideration create a transformative
opportunity for our community without
significant loss of local control.
• Status Quo does not result in additional
financial consideration from outside parties.
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model does not
offer financial consideration
3232
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE15. INTEGRATED, REGIONAL HEALTH SYSTEM
15. Integrated, Regional Health System
Partnership
◕-● ◔ ◔• Partners expressed intent to grow NHRMC
operations into a larger, regional healthcare
system, expanding NHRMC’s capabilities to
serve as the main tertiary and quaternary
care center for the larger region
• NHRMC would be included in an integrated
health system with strong presence in North
Carolina
• Support for maintaining NHRMC's
Management Services Agreement with
Pender and other partners in the service
area
• Flexible approach to unified branding
strategy with the anticipation that partner
brand will increase brand awareness
• Partners provide access to clinical,
operational, and financial resources to
manage healthcare on a regional basis
• Potential expansion into new geographies to
increase size of NHRMC
• NHRMC has cultivated strong relationships
and partnerships with other acute care
providers in the region and has several joint
ventures to provide care across the
continuum
• Status quo would continue the Management
Services Agreement and Clinical Affiliation
with Pender Memorial Hospital
• NHRMC is constrained in its ability to pursue
partnerships outside of New Hanover County
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model may
ease limitations on forming partnerships
outside New Hanover County, but NHRMC
would still be in the same financial position,
and would need access to additional capital
in order to pursue investments outside the
County
3333
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE16. CONTEMPORARY GOVERNANCE MODEL
16. Contemporary Governance Model
Partnership
◔-◕ ○ ◔• Proposals range in governance models.
Board may be subject to governmental
control through County nominations or self-
perpetuating subject to partner approval
depending upon partner chosen
• New board expected to have self governing
or other mechanism to ensure adherence to
governance best practices (e.g., attendance,
education, broad skillsets, diverse
representation, etc.)
• Participation in system level governance
through locally held, system level board
seats
• Current model does not include a process for
addressing skill-set needs and voids among
the NHRMC Board
• Political board member appointment process
• Limited ability to self govern and ensure
adherence to best practices (e.g.,
attendance, education, broad skillsets,
diverse representation, etc.)
• Depending on the revised agreement with
the County, restructuring to a SystemCo
model might allow the NHRMC Board to
appoint, or have more of a voice with respect
to the appointments of, at least a few of the
NHRMC Board members in order to help
address skill-set needs and voids on the
NHRMC Board
• Political board member appointment process
• Limited ability to self govern and ensure
adherence to best practices (e.g.,
attendance, education, broad skillsets,
diverse representation, etc.)
3434
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE17. CONTROL AT THE LOCAL LEVEL
17. Control at the Local Level
Partnership
◕ ● ●• Partners offer high level of local control.
• Majority of NHRMC Board members would
be local residents
• Local NHRMC Board will retain oversight of
and fiduciary responsibility for NHRMC, with
partner maintaining specified reserved
powers
• NHRMC will have representation on the
system board to help shape overall direction
and ensure SENC’s needs continue to be
advanced.
• Participation in system level governance
through locally held, system level board
seats.
• The current model ensures NHRMC’s Board
remains tied to local County Commissioners.
• Political board member appointment process
• Control at the local level would continue
following a restructuring to a SystemCo
model
• Political board member appointment process
3535
KPE SUPPORTING RATIONALE18. LEGAL ORGANIZATIONAL MODEL
18. Legal organizational model
Partnership
◑-◕ ○ ◑• Legal organizational model varies among
proposals but all respondents are North
Carolina based not for profits
• The current model limits, among other things,
(i) investments outside New Hanover
County, (ii) borrowing options, (iii) access to
other capital, (iv) the types of investments
NHRMC may make with excess cash, (v)
ability to scale, and (vi) branding
opportunities
• Restructuring to a SystemCo model could
potentially ease the limitations on investing
outside New Hanover County and borrowing,
and could potentially ease some of the other
limitations
• The simple act of restructuring to SystemCo,
however, would not – on its own – address
the needs impacted by the current limits, as
NHRMC would still be in the same financial
position, and would need access to
additional capital in order to pursue
investments outside the County and to scale,
for example.
3636
CONCLUSION: RESTRUCTURING RETAINS LOCAL CONTROL
BUT DOES NOT SUPPORT ACHIEVING THE REGION’S NEEDS
Non Partnership Options Status Quo Restructuring
Provides access to people, processes, and technology
to achieve implementation of strategic needs X X
Increases NHRMC’s capital capacity to fully fund the
strategic plan X X
Retains local governance of NHRMC
3737
3838
WHERE WE ARE:
Where we are
New Hanover County and New
Hanover Regional Medical
Center leaders saw a need to
explore options based on an
assessment of NHRMC’s current
limitations in meeting the needs
of the rapidly growing region.
This assessment led to the
formation of the Partnership
Advisory Group, which has spent
several months on a thorough
process to explore the needs and
options for the future.
We have three paths
in front of us:
1Continue what we’re doing –– but face
financial pressures down the road, with
fewer options to expand and deliver for
our patients and community.
Status Quo
2Explore new ways of structuring our
operations, but not make a material change
in our ability to expand, raise new funds or
deliver for our patients and community.
Restructure
3Take advantage of an opportunity to bring
transformational change to NHRMC and
the community through a partnership with
a leading health system.
Find a Partner
3939
Securing a healthier future for you,
your children, your grandchildren, and
the community for years to come
Care that helps ensure everyone has a
chance to be well
Nationally recognized health equity
programs working in our communities to
identify, target and eliminate disparities
4040
More care options, when and where you
need them
The backing to withstand changes and
storms
Local people choosing the care our
neighbors need
Economic investment that helps our
community thrive
4141
Our Vision
NHRMC is an industry leader in a new
era of healthcare delivery. Our thriving
community serves as a national model
of achieving excellence for all.
Our Mission
Leading our community to
outstanding health
4242
Exceptional quality and personal service
Health and vitality for all
A diverse and extraordinary workforce
Transformation through empowerment,
innovation and inclusivity.
Our Commitments
43
CLOSING REMARKS
4444
CLOSING REMARKS
Thank You