Upload
amie-little
View
213
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Agenda
• Review of Faculty Tracks
• 2010 revisions to recognize excellence in education
• Mentoring committees (including third- and sixth-year reviews)
• Tenure statistics pre- and post- “Artman I”
• Demonstration of Academic Portfolio
AssistantProfessor
Instructor
AssistantProfessor(Research)
AssistantProfessor
AssistantProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssistantProfessor
ResearchAssistantProfessor
Investigator /Educator
Track
InvestigatorClinician /Educator
Track
ClinicianInvestigator /
EducatorTrack
ResearchTrack
Research /Educator
TrackClinicalTrack
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Research)
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssociateProfessor
ProfessorProfessor(Research) Professor
Professor(Clinical)
ClinicalProfessor
ResearchAssociateProfessor
ResearchProfessor
3 Years
10 Years
Full TimePart Time Part Time
Tenure Track
3 Years
AssistantProfessor
Instructor
AssistantProfessor(Research)
AssistantProfessor
AssistantProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssistantProfessor
ResearchAssistantProfessor
Investigator /Educator
Track
InvestigatorClinician /Educator
Track
ClinicianInvestigator /
EducatorTrack
ResearchTrack
Research /Educator
TrackClinicalTrack
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Research)
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssociateProfessor
ProfessorProfessor(Research) Professor
Professor(Clinical)
ClinicalProfessor
ResearchAssociateProfessor
ResearchProfessor
3 Years
10 Years
Full TimePart Time Part Time
Tenure Track
3 Years
AssistantProfessor
Instructor
AssistantProfessor(Research)
AssistantProfessor
AssistantProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssistantProfessor
ResearchAssistantProfessor
Investigator /Educator
Track
InvestigatorClinician /Educator
Track
ClinicianInvestigator /
EducatorTrack
ResearchTrack
Research /Educator
TrackClinicalTrack
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Research)
AssociateProfessor
AssociateProfessor(Clinical)
ClinicalAssociateProfessor
ProfessorProfessor(Research) Professor
Professor(Clinical)
ClinicalProfessor
ResearchAssociateProfessor
ResearchProfessor
3 Years
10 Years
Full TimePart Time Part Time
Tenure Track
3 Years
Primary ThemesTenure Tracks
• Investigator / Educator Track, a full-time tenure track for those faculty members in any department whose primary career is in independent, investigator-initiated research and who devote some time to education and service.
• Investigator Clinician / Educator Track, a full-time tenure track…for those faculty in the clinical departments whose primary career combines independent research with clinical activities and who devote some time to education and service.
Promotion & TenurePromotion & Tenure
In addition to research and scholarly activities, all tenure track faculty members are required to participate in teaching.
In addition to major efforts in research and teaching, tenure track faculty members are also expected to contribute to the School of Medicine in a service capacity. They can fulfill this obligation by participating in committee work, internal governance and/or community service.
Primary ThemesPrimary ThemesFull-time, Non-tenureFull-time, Non-tenure
• Clinician Investigator / Educator Track, a full-time non-tenure track for those faculty members in clinical departments whose primary career is in the provision of clinical care and who devote a substantial portion of their efforts to teaching, research, and service.
• Research / Educator Track, a full-time non-tenure track for those faculty members in any department whose primary career is in research, but who devote a portion of their efforts to education and service.
PromotionPromotionFull-time, Non-tenure TracksFull-time, Non-tenure Tracks
Promotion on either of these tracks will require documentation of: (1) excellence in teaching, research, and/or patient care; (2) evidence of peer recognition; and (3) contributions of service to the school.
Revised policies include provisions that recognize excellence in teaching, and remove requirement for publications as the sole evidence for “scholarship”
However, excellence in teaching must be demonstrated in academic portfolio
Primary ThemesPart-Time Tracks
• Clinical Track, a part-time non-tenure track for those faculty members in clinical departments whose primary career is in the provision of clinical care and who devote some time to teaching, research and/or service.
• Research Track, a part-time non-tenure track for those faculty involved in part-time or time-limited research in other's laboratories and who devote limited time to teaching and service.
PromotionPromotionPart-time FacultyPart-time Faculty
Clinical Track Faculty members in this track will fulfill a variety of teaching, clinical and service responsibilities in the institution according to the needs of the departments and divisions…[and] will be expected to demonstrate excellence in patient care and teaching, and, when appropriate, to contribute to the service activities of the School of Medicine.
Research Track …In general, promotion for faculty members will be dependent upon the grants of others [and] will be expected to maintain a high level of proficiency and participation in the research program and, when appropriate, may contribute to the educational and service activities of the School of Medicine.
Mentoring Committees
• All full-time Assistant Professors must have a mentoring committee.
• The goal of the committee is to provide the junior faculty member with a critical assessment of his/her progress.
• Two senior faculty, including one from the same department.
• Meet annually.• The committee must provide annual written reports to
the faculty member, the department Chair and (where appropriate) the Program Coordinator/Division Director.
Third- and Sixth-Year Reviews
• Reviews are conducted for all full-time faculty• The Dean’s office notifies the Chair when a review is due• The review is conducted by the Chair and the
Departmental Appointments and Promotions Committee• If tenure is considered unlikely, the Chair meets with the
faculty member to discuss his/her options• The Chair notifies the Dean and faculty member of the
outcome of the meeting in writing
Tenure DecisionsTenure Decisions
• GrantsGrants • NIH Grants, including evidence of renewalNIH Grants, including evidence of renewal • Peer reviewed Peer reviewed publications (especially 1st or publications (especially 1st or
last-author publications)last-author publications)• Innovative technologiesInnovative technologies• Non-peer reviewed publicationsNon-peer reviewed publications• Book Book chapterschapters• AbstractsAbstracts• PresentationsPresentations
Overall Effects of the Artman Report: Success Rates for Pre- and Post-Artman Tenure Applications
65
79
62
76
89
68
0
25
50
75
100
All Basic Clinical
Percent granted
Pre-Artman
Post-Artman
Characteristics of Basic and Clinical Grantees, Pre-Artman
Basic Clinical
Category Mean SD Median Mean SD Median
# Grants 9.91 ± 7.54 8 6.03 ± 4.96 5.5
# NIH Grants* 4.27 ± 2.87 4 1.65 ± 2.24 0.5
$ Amount of grants
3,198,638 ± 3,152,668 2,943,069 3,331,543 ± 4,744,420
1,409,500
# Peer reviewed publications 40.1 ± 14.4 40 35 7 ± 24.0 28
# 1st/last author publications 24.6 ± 8.71 25 21.0 ± 20.2 15
* Statistically significant difference between means for basic v. clinical applicants
Characteristics of Basic and Clinical Grantees, Post-Artman
Basic Clinical
Category Mean SD Median Mean SD Median
# Grants 7.88 ± 4.70 6 10.3 ± 9.51 7.5
# NIH Grants 3.88 ± 3.41 3 3.78 ± 3.75 3.5
$ Amount of grants
4,317,331 ± 3,434,494 3,791,750
5,208,596 ± 6,087,578 3,709,375
# Peer reviewed publications 47.6 ± 29.2 32.5 66.9 ± 53.1 44.5
# 1st/last author publications 27.2 ± 17.6 21 36.1 ± 30.0 25
* Statistically significant difference between means for basic v. clinical applicants
2010 Revisions to Recognize Excellence in Teaching
• Promotion as an educator on tenure track remains
• Criteria added to non-tenure tracks
• Recognition of teaching excellence without requirement for publications or extramural reputation
Excellence in Education
“Excellence in education represents a valued academic endeavor, and will be sufficient for promotion even in the absence of publications and national reputation”
Levinson, W., Rubenstein A., New England Journal of
Medicine Vol 341, No 11: 840-843, September 9, 1999.
Promotion to Rank of Associate Professor
• …. As members of the academic community they should publish the results of their observations…Exceptional candidates may also qualify for promotion based upon evidence of distinguished contributions to the educational mission without publications. Such evidence, which should be documented in an academic portfolio…beyond what is expected from the average faculty member ..…
Revisions 2010
“Therefore, to be considered for promotion, documenting the scholarship of education requires demonstration of accomplishments, which should take the form of a teaching portfolio. Course leadership and design, the judgment of students, trainees, and peers, and meritorious publications may also be considered when a faculty member's teaching is assessed.”