Upload
jack-ryan
View
230
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
1/37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Cecillia D. Wang ( Pro Hac Vice)
ACLU Foundation
Immigrants’ Rights Project
39 Drumm Street
San Francisco, California 94111Telephone: (415) 343-0775
Facsimile: (415) 395-0950
Daniel J. Pochoda
ACLU Foundation of Arizona
3707 N. 7th St., Ste. 235
Phoenix, AZ 85014
Telephone: (602) 650-1854
Facsimile: (602) 650-1376
Attorneys for Plaintiffs (Additional attorneys
for Plaintiffs listed on next page)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres,
et al.,
)
)
CV-07-2513-PHX-GMS
)
Plaintiff(s), ) NOTICE OF SERVICE OF
) SUBPOENA COMMANDING
v. ) DEPOSITION TESTIMONY AND
) THE PRODUCTION OF
Joseph M. Arpaio, et al., ) DOCUMENTS
)
Defendants(s). )
)
)
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 1 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
2/37
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
Additional Attorneys for Plaintiffs:
Andre I. Segura ( Pro Hac Vice)
ACLU Foundation
Immigrants’ Rights Project125 Broad Street, 17th Floor
New York, NY 10004
Telephone: (212) 549-2676
Facsimile: (212) 549-2654
Priscilla G. Dodson ( Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling LLP
One CityCenter850 Tenth Street, NW
Washington, DC 20001-4956
Telephone: (202) 662-5996
Facsimile: (202) 778-5996
Anne Lai ( Pro Hac Vice)
401 E. Peltason, Suite 3500
Irvine, CA 92697-8000
Telephone: (949) 824-9894
Facsimile: (949) 824-0066
Jorge M. Castillo ( Pro Hac Vice)
Mexican American Legal Defense and
Educational Fund
634 South Spring Street, 11th Floor
Los Angeles, California 90014
Telephone: (213) 629-2512Facsimile: (213) 629-0266
Stanley Young ( Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle L. Morin ( Pro Hac Vice)
Hyun S. Byun ( Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling LLP
333 Twin Dolphin DriveSuite 700
Redwood Shores, CA 94065-1418
Telephone: (650) 632-4700
Facsimile: (650) 632-4800
Tammy Albarran ( Pro Hac Vice)
Lauren E. Pedley (Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling LLPOne Front Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
Telephone: (415) 591-7066
Facsimile: (415) 955-6566
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 2 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
3/37
1
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
TO DEFENDANTS AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:
PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
45(b)(1), Plaintiffs have served the attached subpoenas commanding deposition and
trial testimony and intend to serve the attached subpoena for production of documents,
electronically stored information, or tangible things, upon Michael Zullo.
RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED this 25th day of September, 2015.
By: /s/ Michelle L. Morin
Cecillia D. Wang ( Pro Hac Vice)
Andre I. Segura ( Pro Hac Vice)ACLU Foundation
Immigrants’ Rights Project
Daniel Pochoda
ACLU Foundation of Arizona
Anne Lai ( Pro Hac Vice)
Stanley Young ( Pro Hac Vice)
Tammy Albarran ( Pro Hac Vice)
Michelle L. Morin ( Pro Hac Vice)
Lauren E. Pedley (Pro Hac Vice)
Hyun S. Byun ( Pro Hac Vice)
Priscilla G. Dodson ( Pro Hac Vice)
Covington & Burling, LLP
Jorge M. Castillo ( Pro Hac Vice)
Mexican American Legal Defense and
Educational Fund
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 3 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
4/37
2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
2324
25
26
27
28
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I hereby certify that on September 25, 2015 I electronically transmitted the
attached document to the Clerk’s office using the CM/ECF System for filing and
caused the attached document to be served via the CM/ECF System on all counsel of
record.
/s/ Michelle L. Morin
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 4 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
5/37
AO 88A (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action
U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
))
))))
Plaintiff
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO TESTIFY AT A DEPOSITION IN A CIVIL ACTION
To:
(Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed)
Testimony: YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear at the time, date, and place set forth below to testify at adeposition to be taken in this civil action. If you are an organization, you must designate one or more officers, directors,or managing agents, or designate other persons who consent to testify on your behalf about the following matters, or those set forth in an attachment:
Place: Date and Time:
The deposition will be recorded by this method:
Production: You, or your representatives, must also bring with you to the deposition the following documents,electronically stored information, or objects, and must permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of the
material:
The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached – Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance;Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty torespond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so.
Date:
CLERK OF COURT
OR
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney’s signature
The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party)
, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena
If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things beforetrial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the person towhom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
District of Arizona
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
07-2513-PHX-GMS
Joseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
Michael Zullo1921 W Morning Vista Ln Phoenix, AZ 85085-2722
✔
Legal Video Specialists, 3033 N. Central Avenue, Suite 100, Phoenix, Arizona, 85012
10/07/2015 1:00 pm
stenography and video
09/22/2015
s/ Michelle L. Morin
Plaintiffs Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
Michelle L Morin, Covington & Burling, 333 Twin Dolphin Dr, Ste 700, Redwood Shores, CA 94065, [email protected]
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 5 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
6/37
AO 88A (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No.
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)
I received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any)
on (date) .
I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named individual as follows:
on (date) ; or
I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
.
Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also
tendered to the witness the fees for one day’s attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of $ .
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:Server’s signature
Printed name and title
Server’s address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc.:
07-2513-PHX-GMS
0.00
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 6 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
7/37
AO 88A (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Testify at a Deposition in a Civil Action (Page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13)
(c) Place of Compliance.
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition only as follows: (A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or (B) within the state where the person resides, is employed, or regularly
transacts business in person, if the person (i) is a party or a party’s officer; or (ii) is commanded to attend a trial and would not incur substantialexpense.
(2) For Other Discovery. A subpoena may command: (A) production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, isemployed, or regularly transacts business in person; and (B) inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected.
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement.
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorneyresponsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable stepsto avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to thesubpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required must
enforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may includelost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees—on a party or attorney whofails to comply.
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection.(A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to produce
documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition,hearing, or trial.
(B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangiblethings or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises—or to
producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested.The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made,
the following rules apply:(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving partymay move the court for the district where compliance is required for anorder compelling production or inspection.
(ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and theorder must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer fromsignificant expense resulting from compliance.
(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena.
(A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the district wherecompliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that:
(i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply;(ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limits
specified in Rule 45(c);(iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if no
exception or waiver applies; or (iv) subjects a person to undue burden.(B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a
subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, onmotion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research, development,or commercial information; or
(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that doesnot describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’sstudy that was not requested by a party.
(C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstancesdescribed in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or
modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party:(i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be
otherwise met without undue hardship; and (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.
(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information:
(A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documentsmust produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand.
(B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified.If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms in
which it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms.(C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The person responding need not produce the same electronically stored information in more than one form.
(D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The personresponding need not provide discovery of electronically stored informationfrom sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible becauseof undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protectiveorder, the person responding must show that the information is notreasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing ismade, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if therequesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.
(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection.(A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed information
under a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparation
material must:(i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or
tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim.
(B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to asubpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection astrial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any partythat received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After beingnotified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the informationuntil the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve theinformation if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly
present the information under seal to the court for the district wherecompliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who
produced the information must preserve the information until the claim isresolved.
(g) Contempt.The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after amotion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a personwho, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey thesubpoena or an order related to it.
For access to subpoena materials, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a) Committee Note (2013).
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 7 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
8/37
AO 88 (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action
U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
))
)))
Plaintiff
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO APPEAR AND TESTIFY
AT A HEARING OR TRIAL IN A CIVIL ACTION
To:
(Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed)
YOU ARE COMMANDED to appear in the United States district court at the time, date, and place set forth belowto testify at a hearing or trial in this civil action. When you arrive, you must remain at the court until the judge or a court
officer allows you to leave.
Place: Courtroom No.:
Date and Time:
You must also bring with you the following documents, electronically stored information, or objects (leave blank if not applicable):
The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached – Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance;Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty torespond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so.
Date:
CLERK OF COURT OR
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney’s signature
The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party)
, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena
If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things beforetrial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case before it is served on the person towhom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 8 of 37
District of Arizona
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
07-2513-PHX-GMSJoseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
Michael Zullo
Sandra Day O’Connor U.S. Federal Courthouse401 W. Washington St., Phoenix, Arizona 85003-2151
Courtroom 602
09/23/2015
s/ Michelle L. Morin
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
Michelle L Morin, Covington & Burling, 333 Twin Dolphin Dr, Ste 700, Redwood Shores, CA 94065, [email protected]
*and Oct. 27-30, to remain until completion of testimony and dismissal by the Court.
October 8-9, 2015 at 9:00 AM *
October 13-14, 2015 at 9:00 AM *
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
9/37
AO 88 (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page 2)
Civil Action No.
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)
I received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any)
on (date) .
’ I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:
on (date) ; or
’ I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
.
Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also
tendered to the witness the fees for one day’s attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of
$ .
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:
Server’s signature
Printed name and title
Server’s address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc.:
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 9 of 37
07-2513-PHX-GMS
0.00
Print Save As... Add Attachment Reset
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
10/37
AO 88 (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Appear and Testify at a Hearing or Trial in a Civil Action (page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13)
(c) Place of Compliance.
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition only as follows: (A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or (B) within the state where the person resides, is employed, or regularlytransacts business in person, if the person
(i) is a party or a party’s officer; or (ii) is commanded to attend a trial and would not incur substantialexpense.
(2) For Other Discovery. A subpoena may command: (A) production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, isemployed, or regularly transacts business in person; and (B) inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected.
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement.
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorneyresponsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable stepsto avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to thesubpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required mustenforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may include
lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees—on a party or attorney whofails to comply.
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to producedocuments, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to
permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition,hearing, or trial. (B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangiblethings or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises—or to
producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested.The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made,the following rules apply:
(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving partymay move the court for the district where compliance is required for anorder compelling production or inspection. (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and theorder must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer fromsignificant expense resulting from compliance.
(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena. (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the district wherecompliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limitsspecified in Rule 45(c); (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if noexception or waiver applies; or (iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a
subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, onmotion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,development, or commercial information; or
(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that doesnot describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’sstudy that was not requested by a party. (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstancesdescribed in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party: (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be
otherwise met without undue hardship; and (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.
(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information: (A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documentsmust produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand. (B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified.If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms inwhich it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. (C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The
person responding need not produce the same electronically stored
information in more than one form. (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The personresponding need not provide discovery of electronically stored informationfrom sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible becauseof undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protectiveorder, the person responding must show that the information is notreasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing ismade, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if therequesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.
(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed informationunder a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparationmaterial must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or
tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. (B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to asubpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection astrial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any partythat received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After beingnotified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the informationuntil the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve theinformation if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly
present the information under seal to the court for the district wherecompliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who
produced the information must preserve the information until the claim isresolved.
(g) Contempt.The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after a
motion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a personwho, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey thesubpoena or an order related to it.
For access to subpoena materials, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a) Committee Note (2013).
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 10 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
11/37
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action
U NITED STATES DISTRICT COURTfor the
__________ District of __________
))
))))
Plaintiff
v. Civil Action No.
Defendant
SUBPOENA TO PRODUCE DOCUMENTS, INFORMATION, OR OBJECTS
OR TO PERMIT INSPECTION OF PREMISES IN A CIVIL ACTION
To:
(Name of person to whom this subpoena is directed)
’ Production: YOU ARE COMMANDED to produce at the time, date, and place set forth below the followingdocuments, electronically stored information, or objects, and to permit inspection, copying, testing, or sampling of thematerial:
Place: Date and Time:
’ Inspection of Premises: YOU ARE COMMANDED to permit entry onto the designated premises, land, orother property possessed or controlled by you at the time, date, and location set forth below, so that the requesting partymay inspect, measure, survey, photograph, test, or sample the property or any designated object or operation on it.
Place: Date and Time:
The following provisions of Fed. R. Civ. P. 45 are attached – Rule 45(c), relating to the place of compliance;Rule 45(d), relating to your protection as a person subject to a subpoena; and Rule 45(e) and (g), relating to your duty torespond to this subpoena and the potential consequences of not doing so.
Date:
CLERK OF COURT
OR
Signature of Clerk or Deputy Clerk Attorney’s signature
The name, address, e-mail address, and telephone number of the attorney representing (name of party)
, who issues or requests this subpoena, are:
Notice to the person who issues or requests this subpoena
If this subpoena commands the production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things or theinspection of premises before trial, a notice and a copy of the subpoena must be served on each party in this case beforeit is served on the person to whom it is directed. Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a)(4).
(650) 632-4700
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 11 of 37
District of Arizona
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
07-2513-PHX-GMSJoseph M. Arpaio, et al.,
Michael Zullo
See Attachment A.
[email protected] OR ACLU Foundation of Arizona,3707 N. 7th Street, Suite 235, Phoenix, AZ 85014
09/30/2015 4:00 pm
09/23/2015
s/ Michelle L. Morin
Manuel de Jesus Ortega Melendres, et al.
Michelle L Morin, Covington & Burling, 333 Twin Dolphin Dr, Ste 700, Redwood Shores, CA 94065, [email protected]
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
12/37
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action (Page 2)
Civil Action No.
PROOF OF SERVICE
(This section should not be filed with the court unless required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 45.)
I received this subpoena for (name of individual and title, if any)
on (date) .
’ I served the subpoena by delivering a copy to the named person as follows:
on (date) ; or
’ I returned the subpoena unexecuted because:
.
Unless the subpoena was issued on behalf of the United States, or one of its officers or agents, I have also
tendered to the witness the fees for one day’s attendance, and the mileage allowed by law, in the amount of $ .
My fees are $ for travel and $ for services, for a total of $ .
I declare under penalty of perjury that this information is true.
Date:Server’s signature
Printed name and title
Server’s address
Additional information regarding attempted service, etc.:
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 12 of 37
07-2513-PHX-GMS
0.00
Print Save As... Add Attachment Reset
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
13/37
AO 88B (Rev. 02/14) Subpoena to Produce Documents, Information, or Objects or to Permit Inspection of Premises in a Civil Action(Page 3)
Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45 (c), (d), (e), and (g) (Effective 12/1/13)
(c) Place of Compliance.
(1) For a Trial, Hearing, or Deposition. A subpoena may command a person to attend a trial, hearing, or deposition only as follows: (A) within 100 miles of where the person resides, is employed, or regularly transacts business in person; or (B) within the state where the person resides, is employed, or regularlytransacts business in person, if the person
(i) is a party or a party’s officer; or (ii) is commanded to attend a trial and would not incur substantialexpense.
(2) For Other Discovery. A subpoena may command: (A) production of documents, electronically stored information, or tangible things at a place within 100 miles of where the person resides, isemployed, or regularly transacts business in person; and (B) inspection of premises at the premises to be inspected.
(d) Protecting a Person Subject to a Subpoena; Enforcement.
(1) Avoiding Undue Burden or Expense; Sanctions. A party or attorneyresponsible for issuing and serving a subpoena must take reasonable stepsto avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to thesubpoena. The court for the district where compliance is required mustenforce this duty and impose an appropriate sanction—which may include
lost earnings and reasonable attorney’s fees—on a party or attorney whofails to comply.
(2) Command to Produce Materials or Permit Inspection. (A) Appearance Not Required. A person commanded to producedocuments, electronically stored information, or tangible things, or to
permit the inspection of premises, need not appear in person at the place of production or inspection unless also commanded to appear for a deposition,hearing, or trial. (B) Objections. A person commanded to produce documents or tangiblethings or to permit inspection may serve on the party or attorney designated in the subpoena a written objection to inspecting, copying, testing, or sampling any or all of the materials or to inspecting the premises—or to
producing electronically stored information in the form or forms requested.The objection must be served before the earlier of the time specified for compliance or 14 days after the subpoena is served. If an objection is made,the following rules apply:
(i) At any time, on notice to the commanded person, the serving partymay move the court for the district where compliance is required for anorder compelling production or inspection. (ii) These acts may be required only as directed in the order, and theorder must protect a person who is neither a party nor a party’s officer fromsignificant expense resulting from compliance.
(3) Quashing or Modifying a Subpoena. (A) When Required. On timely motion, the court for the district wherecompliance is required must quash or modify a subpoena that: (i) fails to allow a reasonable time to comply; (ii) requires a person to comply beyond the geographical limitsspecified in Rule 45(c); (iii) requires disclosure of privileged or other protected matter, if noexception or waiver applies; or (iv) subjects a person to undue burden. (B) When Permitted. To protect a person subject to or affected by a
subpoena, the court for the district where compliance is required may, onmotion, quash or modify the subpoena if it requires:
(i) disclosing a trade secret or other confidential research,development, or commercial information; or
(ii) disclosing an unretained expert’s opinion or information that doesnot describe specific occurrences in dispute and results from the expert’sstudy that was not requested by a party. (C) Specifying Conditions as an Alternative. In the circumstancesdescribed in Rule 45(d)(3)(B), the court may, instead of quashing or modifying a subpoena, order appearance or production under specified conditions if the serving party: (i) shows a substantial need for the testimony or material that cannot be
otherwise met without undue hardship; and (ii) ensures that the subpoenaed person will be reasonably compensated.
(e) Duties in Responding to a Subpoena.
(1) Producing Documents or Electronically Stored Information. These procedures apply to producing documents or electronically stored information: (A) Documents. A person responding to a subpoena to produce documentsmust produce them as they are kept in the ordinary course of business or must organize and label them to correspond to the categories in the demand. (B) Form for Producing Electronically Stored Information Not Specified.If a subpoena does not specify a form for producing electronically stored information, the person responding must produce it in a form or forms inwhich it is ordinarily maintained or in a reasonably usable form or forms. (C) Electronically Stored Information Produced in Only One Form. The
person responding need not produce the same electronically stored
information in more than one form. (D) Inaccessible Electronically Stored Information. The personresponding need not provide discovery of electronically stored informationfrom sources that the person identifies as not reasonably accessible becauseof undue burden or cost. On motion to compel discovery or for a protectiveorder, the person responding must show that the information is notreasonably accessible because of undue burden or cost. If that showing ismade, the court may nonetheless order discovery from such sources if therequesting party shows good cause, considering the limitations of Rule26(b)(2)(C). The court may specify conditions for the discovery.
(2) Claiming Privilege or Protection. (A) Information Withheld. A person withholding subpoenaed informationunder a claim that it is privileged or subject to protection as trial-preparationmaterial must: (i) expressly make the claim; and (ii) describe the nature of the withheld documents, communications, or
tangible things in a manner that, without revealing information itself privileged or protected, will enable the parties to assess the claim. (B) Information Produced. If information produced in response to asubpoena is subject to a claim of privilege or of protection astrial-preparation material, the person making the claim may notify any partythat received the information of the claim and the basis for it. After beingnotified, a party must promptly return, sequester, or destroy the specified information and any copies it has; must not use or disclose the informationuntil the claim is resolved; must take reasonable steps to retrieve theinformation if the party disclosed it before being notified; and may promptly
present the information under seal to the court for the district wherecompliance is required for a determination of the claim. The person who
produced the information must preserve the information until the claim isresolved.
(g) Contempt.The court for the district where compliance is required—and also, after a
motion is transferred, the issuing court—may hold in contempt a personwho, having been served, fails without adequate excuse to obey thesubpoena or an order related to it.
For access to subpoena materials, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 45(a) Committee Note (2013).
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 13 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
14/37
1
Attachment A
Request #1:
Copies, to be provided in native format with metadata, of all emails, text messages, or
other written communications, including any attachments and metadata, and includingcommunications and DOCUMENTS sent to or from personal email accounts such as
[email protected], [email protected], [email protected], and emails and text
messages sent using personal smartphones, tablets or other communications devices or
MCSO-provided devices, sent to or from YOU, Sheriff Arpaio, Chief Deputy Sheridan,
Brian Mackiewicz, Dennis Montgomery a/k/a David Webb, Retired Executive Chief
Brian Sands, any employee of Maricopa County Sheriff's Office, or any member of the
Cold Case Posse, from December 23, 2011 through the present, that mention or relate to:
(a) Dennis Montgomery's activities, on behalf of YOU, Sheriff Arpaio, or MCSO,
relating to the timeline and diagram provided in the "Joe Arpaio Brief" (attached
as Exhibit A)
(b) the Melendres litigation, the court's orders relating to the litigation, plaintiffs in
that litigation and plaintiffs' attorneys in that litigation, and the court-appointed
Monitor,
(c) any investigation conducted by Sheriff Arpaio or MCSO or agents of Sheriff
Arpaio or MCSO, or on Sheriff Arpaio's or MCSO's behalf, of Judge Snow or of
any judge or elected official, and/or their family members and/or their associates.
Request #2:
Copies, to be provided in native format with metadata, of any work product in your
possession regarding items (a)-(c) of Request #1, including all revisions and drafts.
DEFINITIONS AND INSTRUCTIONS
1. “YOU” is defined to include you, and any person or entity acting or
purporting to act on their behalf, at their direction, or under their supervision.
2. “DEFENDANTS” is defined to include the named defendants in this
matter, Joseph Arpaio, in his official capacity as the sheriff of Maricopa County, and
Maricopa County, and any person or entity acting or purporting to act on their behalf, at
their direction, or under their supervision.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 14 of 37
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
15/37
2
3. “RELATE” OR “RELATING TO” means evidencing, memorializing,
referring, concerning, constituting, containing, discussing, describing, embodying,
reflecting, identifying, mentioning, stating, responding or otherwise alluding to or
relating to in any way, in whole or in part, the subject matter referred to in the
interrogatory.
4. “DOCUMENT” and “DOCUMENTS” are defined to be synonymous in
meaning and equal in scope to the usage of the terms in Federal Rule of Civil Procedure
34(a), in its broadest sense, and shall mean and include all written, printed, typed,
recorded or graphic matter of every kind and description, both originals and copies, and
all attachments and appendices thereto, that are in YOUR possession, custody or control,
or in the possession, custody or control of the YOUR attorneys. A draft of a non-
identical copy is a separate DOCUMENT within the meaning of this term. Without
limiting the term “control,” a DOCUMENT is deemed to be within YOUR control if
YOU have ownership, possession or custody of the DOCUMENT, or the right to secure
the DOCUMENT or copy thereof from any PERSONS or public or private entity having
physical control thereof.
5. “PERSON” means, inclusively, any natural person, proprietorship,
partnership, joint venture, trust, group, agency, department, association, corporation or
any other entity or organization, and any agent or employee of any of those individual
entities.
6. “COMMUNICATION” means any oral or written contact, regardless ofmethod, between two or more persons, organizations, companies, or other business
entities, regardless of form, and shall include, without limitation, notes, letters,
memoranda, email, facsimile, reports, briefings, telegrams, telex or, by any document,
oral contact by such means as face to face meetings and/or telephone conversations, or
any form of transmittal of information in the form of facts, ideas, inquiries, or otherwise.
7. Words used in the plural shall be interpreted to include the singular, and
words used in the singular shall be interpreted to include the plural.
8. The terms “and” as well as “or” shall be construed either disjunctively orconjunctively in order to bring within the scope of the specifications stated in a Request
all responses that might otherwise be deemed outside the scope.
9. The use of a verb in any tense shall be construed as the use of the verb in all
other tenses, whenever necessary to bring into the scope of the specification all responses
which might otherwise be construed outside the scope.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 15 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
16/37
3
10. The use of any masculine or feminine pronoun includes both the masculine
and feminine.
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 16 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
17/37
EXHIBIT A
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 17 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
18/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.3a
IP Time From To Du
te Description Address Call Call Call in
01 - 2008 Eric Holder Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
01 – 2009 Lanny Breuer Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
12/07 ACLU Files Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio
15/08 US Department of Justice (DOJ) announces investigation into Joe Arpaio
01/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Hires Eric Holder Attorney General US
15/09 Arizona Attorney General (AG) Issues Search Warrant Deputy Joel Fox
20/09 Lanny Breuer Hired As Assistant AG Criminal Div. - DOJ
07/09 Joe Arpaio Announces he will not cooperate with DOJ Investigation
15/09 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia recuses herself from the Arpaio case.
20/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
22/09 Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Cases (Not Random)
23/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
01/09 John Gray Starts Intern Clerk Job with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
26/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 602.322.7650 202.514.2000
28/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Wire Tap #56990-34 Block 602-920-4000,++
15/09 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.65
Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
25/10 Federal Judge Mary Murguia nominated to the 9th
Circuit Court Appeals.24/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
28/10 DOJ Criminal Division Wire Tap #64402-03 602-920-4400, 602-920-4000
15/10 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.65
Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
10/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Take Over Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio.
02/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files suit against Arpaio
15/10 John Gray Ends Intern Clerk with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
01/10 John Gray Joins Perkins Coie Law Firm
23/10 US Government Breached - www.jshfirm.com mail.jshfirm.com 216.119.127.142
Service25-us.mimecast.com ; service26-us.mimecast.com
MELC199917
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 28 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 18 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
19/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.3a
IP Time From To Du
te Description Address Call Call Call in
25/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Calls Perkins Coie (John Gray) 16:30 202.514.2000 602.351.8092
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Federal Judge Snow Chambers 16:42 602.351.8092 602.322.7560
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Maricopa County Cell Phone ++ 16:55 602.351.8092 602.+++
04/11 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia approved as 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge
/23/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires Chief Deputy David Hendershott and Deputy Larry Black
21/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires MSCO Captain Joel Fox
01/11 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files complaint against Sheriff Arpaio
19/12 Melendres vs. Sheriff Arpaio Trial Heard by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
01/13 Lanny Breuer Resigns from DOJ and rejoins Covington Burling Law Firm
/13/13 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Joins Melendres Lawsuit with Covington Law Firm
02/13 Judge G. Murray Snow Rules in Class Action Lawsuit Against Joe Arpaio
Red - Phone Calls made to or from the Department of Justice
Green - John Gray Interns for Federal Judge G. Murray Snow (2009 - 2010)
Blue - Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Case
MELC199918
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 29 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 19 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
20/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.3a
MELC199919
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 30 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 20 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
21/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.3a
MELC199920
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 31 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 21 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
22/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.4c
Breach Time From To Du
te Description IP Address Call Call Call in
01 - 2008 Eric Holder Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
01 – 2009 Lanny Breuer Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
12/07 ACLU Files Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio
15/08 US Department of Justice (DOJ) announces investigation into Joe Arpaio
01/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Hires Eric Holder Attorney General US
15/09 Arizona Attorney General (AG) Issues Search Warrant Deputy Joel Fox
20/09 Lanny Breuer Hired As Assistant AG Criminal Div. - DOJ
07/09 Joe Arpaio Announces he will not cooperate with DOJ Investigation
15/09 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia recuses herself from the Arpaio case.
20/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
22/09 Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Cases (Not Random)
23/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
01/09 John Gray Starts Intern Clerk Job with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
16/09 Dennis Burke Becomes US Attorney General Arizona
25/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Dennis Burke US Attorney Arizona 10:43 202.514.2000 602.514.7500
26/09 Judge G. Murray Snow Calls US Department of Justice (DOJ) 11:04 602.322.7560 202.514.2000
28/09 Dennis Burke US Attorney - Calls Judge G. Murray Snow 11:44 602.514.7500 602.322.7560
28/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Wire Tap #56990-34 Block 602-920-4000,++
15/09 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.65Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
25/10 Federal Judge Mary Murguia nominated to the 9th Circuit Court Appeals.
24/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Civil Rights Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.6225 602.322.7560
28/10 DOJ Criminal Division Wire Tap #64402-03 602-920-4400, 602-920-4000
15/10 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.65
Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
10/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Take Over Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio.
02/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files suit against Arpaio
15/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Call Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.307.0652 602.322.7560
MELC199921
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 32 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 22 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
23/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.4c
Breach Time From To Du
te Description IP Address Call Call Call in
15/10 John Gray Ends Intern Clerk with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
01/10 John Gray Joins Perkins Coie Law Firm
23/10 US Government Breached - www.jshfirm.com mail.jshfirm.com 216.119.127.142
Service25-us.mimecast.com ; service26-us.mimecast.com
25/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Calls Perkins Coie (John Gray) 16:30 202.514.2000 602.351.8092
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Federal Judge Snow Chambers 16:42 602.351.8092 602.322.7560
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Maricopa County Cell Phone ++ 16:55 602.351.8092 602.+++
04/11 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia approved as 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge
/23/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires Chief Deputy David Hendershott and Deputy Larry Black
30/11 Dennis Burke Resigns As Us Attorney Arizona - Fast and Furious Scandal
21/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires MSCO Captain Joel Fox
01/11 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files complaint against Sheriff Arpaio
19/12 Melendres vs. Sheriff Arpaio Trial Heard by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
01/13 Lanny Breuer Resigns from DOJ and rejoins Covington Burling Law Firm
/13/13 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Joins Melendres Lawsuit with Covington Law Firm
02/13 Judge G. Murray Snow Rules in Class Action Lawsuit Against Joe Arpaio
Red - Phone Calls made to or from the Department of Justice
Green - John Gray Interns for Federal Judge G. Murray Snow (2009 - 2010)
Blue - Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Case
MELC199922
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 33 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 23 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
24/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.4c
MELC199923
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 34 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 24 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
25/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.4c
MELC199924
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 35 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 25 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
26/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.5a
Breach Time From To Du
te Description IP Address Call Call Call in
01 - 2008 Eric Holder Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
01 – 2009 Lanny Breuer Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
12/07 ACLU Files Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio
15/08 US Department of Justice (DOJ) announces investigation into Joe Arpaio
01/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Hires Eric Holder Attorney General US
15/09 Arizona Attorney General (AG) Issues Search Warrant Deputy Joel Fox
20/09 Lanny Breuer Hired As Assistant AG Criminal Div. - DOJ
07/09 Joe Arpaio Announces he will not cooperate with DOJ Investigation
15/09 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia recuses herself from the Arpaio case.
20/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
22/09 Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Cases (Not Random)
23/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
01/09 John Gray Starts Intern Clerk Job with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
16/09 Dennis Burke Becomes US Attorney General Arizona
25/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Dennis Burke US Attorney Arizona 10:43 202.514.2000 602.514.7500
26/09 Judge G. Murray Snow Calls US Department of Justice (DOJ) 11:04 602.322.7560 202.514.2000
28/09 Dennis Burke US Attorney - Calls Judge G. Murray Snow 11:44 602.514.7500 602.322.7560
28/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Wire Tap #56990-34 Block 602-920-4000,++
15/09 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.65Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
25/10 Federal Judge Mary Murguia nominated to the 9th Circuit Court Appeals.
24/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Civil Rights Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.6225 602.322.7560
28/10 DOJ Criminal Division Wire Tap #64402-03 602-920-4400, 602-920-4000
15/10 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.65
Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
10/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Take Over Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio.
02/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files suit against Arpaio
15/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Call Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.307.0652 602.322.7560
MELC199925
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 36 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 26 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
27/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.5a
Breach Time From To Du
te Description IP Address Call Call Call in
15/10 John Gray Ends Intern Clerk with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
01/10 John Gray Joins Perkins Coie Law Firm
18/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Call Department of Justice (DOJ) - Not In This Case 14:55 650.632.4704 202.514.6225
22/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Call Perkins Coie (John Gray) 14:21 650.632.4704 602.351.8092
23/10 US Government Breached - www.jshfirm.com mail.jshfirm.com 216.119.127.142
Service25-us.mimecast.com ; service26-us.mimecast.com
25/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Calls Perkins Coie (John Gray) 16:30 202.514.2000 602.351.8092
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Federal Judge Snow Chambers 16:42 602.351.8092 602.322.7560
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Maricopa County Cell Phone ++ 16:55 602.351.8092 602.+++
04/11 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia approved as 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge
/23/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires Chief Deputy David Hendershott and Deputy Larry Black
30/11 Dennis Burke Resigns As Us Attorney Arizona - Fast and Furious Scandal
21/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires MSCO Captain Joel Fox
01/11 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files complaint against Sheriff Arpaio
19/12 Melendres vs. Sheriff Arpaio Trial Heard by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
01/13 Lanny Breuer Resigns from DOJ and rejoins Covington Burling Law Firm
/13/13 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Joins Melendres Lawsuit with Covington Law Firm
02/13 Judge G. Murray Snow Rules in Class Action Lawsuit Against Joe Arpaio
Red - Phone Calls made to or from the Department of JusticeGreen - John Gray Interns for Federal Judge G. Murray Snow (2009 - 2010)
Blue - Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Case
MELC199926
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 37 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 27 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
28/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.5a
MELC199927
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 38 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 28 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
29/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 1.5a
MELC199928
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 39 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 29 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
30/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 2.0
Breach Time From To Du
te Description IP Address Call Call Call in
01 - 2008 Eric Holder Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
01 – 2009 Lanny Breuer Senior Partner Covington Burling Law Firm
12/07 ACLU Files Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio
15/08 US Department of Justice (DOJ) announces investigation into Joe Arpaio
01/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Hires Eric Holder Attorney General US
15/09 Arizona Attorney General (AG) Issues Search Warrant Deputy Joel Fox
20/09 Lanny Breuer Hired As Assistant AG Criminal Div. - DOJ
07/09 Joe Arpaio Announces he will not cooperate with DOJ Investigation
15/09 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia recuses herself from the Arpaio case.
20/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
22/09 Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Cases (Not Random)
23/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.2000 602.322.7560
01/09 John Gray Starts Intern Clerk Job with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
16/09 Dennis Burke Becomes US Attorney General Arizona
25/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Calls Dennis Burke US Attorney Arizona 10:43 202.514.2000 602.514.7500
26/09 Judge G. Murray Snow Calls US Department of Justice (DOJ) 11:04 602.322.7560 202.514.2000
28/09 Dennis Burke US Attorney - Calls Judge G. Murray Snow 11:44 602.514.7500 602.322.7560
28/09 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Wire Tap #56990-34 Block 602-920-4000,++
15/09 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
15/09 Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.6515/09 Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
25/10 Federal Judge Mary Murguia nominated to the 9th Circuit Court Appeals.
24/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) - Civil Rights Calls Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.514.6225 602.322.7560
28/10 DOJ Criminal Division Wire Tap #64402-03 602-920-4400, 602-920-4000
15/10 US Gov breached Maricopa all domains, and subdomains 156.42.184.18
15/10 Maricopa Government - mcao.maricpoa.gov - mcso.maricopa.gov 156.42.184.65
15/10 Mail servers: extmail1.maricopa.gov extmail2.maricopa.gov 156.42.103.166
10/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Take Over Melendres Lawsuit Against Arpaio.
02/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files suit against Arpaio
MELC199929
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 40 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 30 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
31/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 2.0
Breach Time From To Du
te Description IP Address Call Call Call in
15/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Call Federal Judge G. Murray Snow 202.307.0652 602.322.7560
15/10 John Gray Ends Intern Clerk with Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
01/10 John Gray Joins Perkins Coie Law Firm
18/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Call Department of Justice (DOJ) - Not In This Case 14:55 650.632.4704 202.514.6225
22/10 Covington Burling Law Firm Call Perkins Coie (John Gray) 14:21 650.632.4704 602.351.8092
23/10 US Government Breached - www.jshfirm.com mail.jshfirm.com 216.119.127.142
23/10 Service25-us.mimecast.com ; service26-us.mimecast.com
25/10 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Calls Perkins Coie (John Gray) 16:30 202.514.2000 602.351.8092
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Federal Judge Snow Chambers 16:42 602.351.8092 602.322.7560
25/10 Perkins Coie Associate (John Gray) makes call to Maricopa County Cell Phone ++ 16:55 602.351.8092 602.+++
04/11 US Federal Judge Mary Murguia approved as 9th Circuit Court of Appeals Judge
/23/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires Chief Deputy David Hendershott and Deputy Larry Black
30/11 Dennis Burke Resigns As Us Attorney Arizona - Fast and Furious Scandal
21/11 Sheriff Arpaio Fires MSCO Captain Joel Fox
01/11 US Department of Justice (DOJ) files complaint against Sheriff Arpaio
18/12 US Rep Jon Kyl office call Department of Justice Office Attorney - Amin Aminfar 11:14 202.224.4521 202-307-0652
19/12 Melendres vs. Sheriff Arpaio Trial Heard by Federal Judge G. Murray Snow
24/12 Covington Burling Law Fim Call to US Rep Jon Kyl office 11:58 202.662.6000 202.224.4521
/13/13 US Department of Justice (DOJ) Joins Melendres Lawsuit with Covington Law Firm
02/13 Judge G. Murray Snow Rules in Class Action Lawsuit Against Joe Arpaio
Red - Phone Calls made to or from the Department of JusticeGreen - John Gray Interns for Federal Judge G. Murray Snow (2009 - 2010)
Blue - Judge G. Murray Snow Assigned To Arpaio Federal Case
MELC199930
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 41 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 31 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
32/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 2.0
MELC199931
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 42 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 32 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
33/37
JOE ARPAIO BRIEF
Timeline
_____________________________ nfidential Information Not to Be Disclosed Rev 2.0
MELC199932
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 43 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 33 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
34/37
MELC199933
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 44 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 34 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
35/37
MELC199934
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 45 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 35 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
36/37
MELC199935
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1166 Filed 07/10/15 Page 46 of 61Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 36 of 37
8/20/2019 Melendres # 1396 | Zullo Subpoena
37/37
Case 2:07-cv-02513-GMS Document 1396 Filed 09/25/15 Page 37 of 37