2
J Physiol 592.5 (2014) pp 823–824 823 The Journal of Physiology PERSPECTIVES Membrane pacman: small steps for the voltage-sensitive phosphatases Le´ on D. Islas Departamento de Fisiolog´ ıa, Facultad de Medicina, UNAM, M´ exico City, M´ exico Email: [email protected] The voltage-sensitive phosphatases (VSPs) are a fascinating family of membrane- associated enzymes consisting of a voltage- sensing domain (VSD), similar to that found in canonical voltage-gated channels, and an intracellular catalytic domain. Although found in every eukaryotic organism, their functions are not at all clear. Since many of these phosphatases catalyse the degradation of important signalling lipids such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5- bisphosphate (PIP 2 ), they serve several important functions. For example, they control sperm mobility and play a role in depolarization-induced calcium trans- ients upon egg fertilization. It has been speculated that they are important in the control of cell proliferation and organ differentiation; however, our understanding Figure 1. Schematic representation of the subunits and gating paths of VSPs and ion channels The resting states of the voltage-sensing domains, R i , are occupied at negative voltages, while depolarization shifts the equilibrium towards activated states, A i . The orange arrows represent the charge-moving transitions that give rise to the sensing current. Canonical voltage-gated channels follow the path enclosed in grey, in which the open state is reached only after all charge-moving transitions take place, while the voltage-sensitive phosphatase Dr-VSP can access the activated (catalytic) states, A i , from any of the resting states, R i . of the physiological roles of these proteins is still developing (Villalba-Galea, 2012). Voltage-dependent control of enzymatic activity in VSPs was first demonstrated by Murata et al. (2005). It was also shown that changes in voltage produce charge movement mediated by the VSD that can be recorded as transient sensing currents, related to the gating currents of voltage-dependent ion channels. One of the major questions still needing clarification is what is the mechanism by which the VSD controls the enzymatic activity. Progress in this area of research has been rapid and the article by Sakata and Okamura in this issue of The Journal of Physiology (Sakata & Okamura, 2014) represents an important advance into this problem. In the case of the tetrameric voltage-gated ion channels, four VSDs are coupled to the opening of a single pore domain, which can be thought of as the analogue of the catalytic domain in VSPs. It has been known for some time that membrane depolarization causes outward movement of the VSDs and that this is coupled to opening of the channel pore through a specialized linker domain. For these proteins, the electromechanical coupling process is strict, meaning that all four VSDs have to be in an activated position for the pore to be open and this relationship can be evidenced experimentally because charge movement, in the form of gating or sensing currents, precedes channel opening at all voltages. It also means that spontaneous or voltage-independent opening of the channel pore is exceedingly improbable. An important similar question for the VSPs relates to the interplay between VSD movements, as reported by the transient sensing current, and the activity of the phosphatase domain. Does the VSD need to be fully activated upon depolarization for the enzymatic activity to take place? The X-ray structures of the catalytic domain suggest a direct and graded control of the catalytic domain by voltage through activation of the VSD, but this point still requires clarification (Kohout et al. 2010). Sakata & Okamura (2014) now shed light on this matter in their novel studies that make use of a clever combination of diverse mutants of the Danio rerio (zebrafish) phosphatase, known as Dr-VSP. Their present findings demonstrate that the phosphatase activity is linked to VSD movement in a graded fashion. In other words, the voltage sensor domain does not need to be fully activated to trigger the enzymatic activity. The experiments in this work thus are consistent with a coupling between charge movement and enzyme activity that is different from what has been observed in voltage-gated potassium ion channels. These data suggest instead that, in contrast to voltage-gated channels, an allosteric coupling model could explain the relationship between activation of the voltage sensor and the catalytic domain of Dr-VSP (Fig. 1). In such a mechanism, both the resting and the activated state(s) of the voltage sensor can drive the activation of the phosphatase domain, although with different efficiencies. If this is the case, one immediate prediction of an allosteric coupling model is that there should be some phosphatase activity at negative potentials. In reality such spontaneous and voltage-independent activity might be very difficult to detect. Another consequence of the allosteric mechanism is that charge movement should have different voltage dependence when the phosphatase is in the active or the inactive conformation. Sakata & Okamura (2014) have thus opened the C 2014 The Author. The Journal of Physiology C 2014 The Physiological Society DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.269423

Membrane pacman: small steps for the voltage-sensitive phosphatases

  • Upload
    leon-d

  • View
    213

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Membrane pacman: small steps for the voltage-sensitive phosphatases

J Physiol 592.5 (2014) pp 823–824 823

The

Jou

rnal

of

Phys

iolo

gy

PERSPECT IVES

Membrane pacman: small stepsfor the voltage-sensitivephosphatases

Leon D. IslasDepartamento de Fisiologıa, Facultad deMedicina, UNAM, Mexico City, Mexico

Email: [email protected]

The voltage-sensitive phosphatases (VSPs)are a fascinating family of membrane-associated enzymes consisting of a voltage-sensing domain (VSD), similar to that foundin canonical voltage-gated channels, andan intracellular catalytic domain. Althoughfound in every eukaryotic organism,their functions are not at all clear.Since many of these phosphatases catalysethe degradation of important signallinglipids such as phosphatidylinositol 4,5-bisphosphate (PIP2), they serve severalimportant functions. For example, theycontrol sperm mobility and play a rolein depolarization-induced calcium trans-ients upon egg fertilization. It has beenspeculated that they are important in thecontrol of cell proliferation and organdifferentiation; however, our understanding

Figure 1. Schematic representation of the subunits and gating paths of VSPs and ionchannelsThe resting states of the voltage-sensing domains, Ri, are occupied at negative voltages, whiledepolarization shifts the equilibrium towards activated states, Ai. The orange arrows representthe charge-moving transitions that give rise to the sensing current. Canonical voltage-gatedchannels follow the path enclosed in grey, in which the open state is reached only after allcharge-moving transitions take place, while the voltage-sensitive phosphatase Dr-VSP can accessthe activated (catalytic) states, Ai, from any of the resting states, Ri.

of the physiological roles of these proteins isstill developing (Villalba-Galea, 2012).

Voltage-dependent control of enzymaticactivity in VSPs was first demonstratedby Murata et al. (2005). It was alsoshown that changes in voltage producecharge movement mediated by the VSDthat can be recorded as transient sensingcurrents, related to the gating currents ofvoltage-dependent ion channels. One of themajor questions still needing clarification iswhat is the mechanism by which the VSDcontrols the enzymatic activity. Progress inthis area of research has been rapid andthe article by Sakata and Okamura in thisissue of The Journal of Physiology (Sakata& Okamura, 2014) represents an importantadvance into this problem.

In the case of the tetrameric voltage-gatedion channels, four VSDs are coupled tothe opening of a single pore domain,which can be thought of as the analogueof the catalytic domain in VSPs. It hasbeen known for some time that membranedepolarization causes outward movementof the VSDs and that this is coupledto opening of the channel pore througha specialized linker domain. For theseproteins, the electromechanical couplingprocess is strict, meaning that all four VSDs

have to be in an activated position for thepore to be open and this relationship canbe evidenced experimentally because chargemovement, in the form of gating or sensingcurrents, precedes channel opening at allvoltages. It also means that spontaneous orvoltage-independent opening of the channelpore is exceedingly improbable.

An important similar question for theVSPs relates to the interplay between VSDmovements, as reported by the transientsensing current, and the activity of thephosphatase domain. Does the VSD needto be fully activated upon depolarizationfor the enzymatic activity to take place?The X-ray structures of the catalytic domainsuggest a direct and graded control ofthe catalytic domain by voltage throughactivation of the VSD, but this point stillrequires clarification (Kohout et al. 2010).

Sakata & Okamura (2014) now shedlight on this matter in their novel studiesthat make use of a clever combinationof diverse mutants of the Danio rerio(zebrafish) phosphatase, known as Dr-VSP.Their present findings demonstrate thatthe phosphatase activity is linked to VSDmovement in a graded fashion. In otherwords, the voltage sensor domain does notneed to be fully activated to trigger theenzymatic activity. The experiments in thiswork thus are consistent with a couplingbetween charge movement and enzymeactivity that is different from what has beenobserved in voltage-gated potassium ionchannels.

These data suggest instead that, incontrast to voltage-gated channels, anallosteric coupling model could explainthe relationship between activation of thevoltage sensor and the catalytic domain ofDr-VSP (Fig. 1). In such a mechanism,both the resting and the activated state(s) ofthe voltage sensor can drive the activationof the phosphatase domain, although withdifferent efficiencies. If this is the case,one immediate prediction of an allostericcoupling model is that there should besome phosphatase activity at negativepotentials. In reality such spontaneous andvoltage-independent activity might be verydifficult to detect. Another consequenceof the allosteric mechanism is that chargemovement should have different voltagedependence when the phosphatase is in theactive or the inactive conformation. Sakata& Okamura (2014) have thus opened the

C© 2014 The Author. The Journal of Physiology C© 2014 The Physiological Society DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.2013.269423

Page 2: Membrane pacman: small steps for the voltage-sensitive phosphatases

824 Perspectives J Physiol 592.5

gates for such future experiments, whichwill enhance our understanding of the innerworkings of these mesmerizing proteins.

References

Kohout SC, Bell SC, Liu L, Xu Q, Minor DL Jr &Isacoff EY (2010). Nat Chem Biol 6, 369–375.

Murata Y, Iwasaki H, Sasaki M, Inaba K &Okamura Y (2005). Nature 435, 1239–1243.

Sakata S & Okamura Y (2014). J Physiol 592,899–914.

Villalba-Galea CA (2012). Front Pharmacol 3,161.

Additional information

Competing interests

None declared.

C© 2014 The Author. The Journal of Physiology C© 2014 The Physiological Society