0

Meta-Concept Operands, or a magickal technique for problem-solving

By Malierk 23, 2015

This is a short description of a technical-magickal

system for problem-solving beyond conscious thresholds;

developed for the purpose of unloading the information, and

processing load from the regular mode of mind and

consciousness, which is imperfect at handling advanced

currents and information loads (or any currents beyond the

human aggregates of perceptions and organs of contact with

the currents); It is designed to process the problem beyond

unconscious threshold, and then descramble it on a conscious

level, to get a linear answer. It is excellent at avoiding

the pitfalls of distortion of psycho-nautic exploration,

bypassing certain conscious zones, and augments diving into

the depth of reality and getting feedback input avoiding the

local mental noise-pollutants; On a psychological level it

might have an auto-suggestive value, and may be used as

complex motivation for coming up with answers. On magickal

level it a passage that is negotiated, staged, and cued by

different currents and the accordant Deities and Entities

emanating from the currents of the stream of movement

enveiled in consciousness, so the answers differ depending

on the aspect of tainted character of reality we get our

answers from; It might be used for further experimentation

with getting different perspectives, probing into different

currents and realities. The topography of movement and mind-

warps is

Horizontal (pseudo-entropical) Depth: Thickness of

order and disorder in geometrical complexity of

the sourced domains

Vertical (pseudo-hierarchical) Depth: Thickness

of strength of influence and range of influence

within the source domains

1

Procedure:

A) Question, establishing tenets and the ‘universe of

discourse’, write down your questions in a regular

order

B) Encrypting: Invent a set of symbols as conveyors of

information, reduce the abstract concepts to symbolic

descriptives, delimiting the input

C) Contact your currents/deities/oracles

D) Manipulating encryption: Load the symbols with

meanings; leave descriptive cues; once the trigger is

initiated reduce back to symbols;

E) Introduce the variables:

Initator (sequence launcher, initial

encoding)

Attractor (possile freedom of answer, around

the given focus-point, main idea)

Variegator (possible answers, or encrypting

the neutral grounds, not to be subjectively-

leaning, activating intuition coupled with

the oracle-contact, introducing diversity)

Catalyst (establishing a line of

communication for the answer to form in the

mind)

F) Encrypt the intent in symbols

G) Meditate upon the answer, and translate idea-level

into concepts, use active imagination and let it flow

into the encryptor symbol

H) Translate concepts into human intelligible output,

re-constellate them and reduce to words; Interpreting

intuitions into transparent frameworks.

Example in which the conundrums posed created the tool:

and contained it in a paradox: the conundrum solving the

tool, and the tool solving the problem – sentimental trip

that lead to the creation of this technique

2

Embedded questions Attractor, Variegator, Initiator, Catalyst

Synthesis

Sets of questions:

a) Unitary essence field of topography related in union,

premise: entropy topography is unitary at the depth

b) To what extent the power emasculated in an idea is the

direct knowledge of power?

c) Perception limited by human mind-form is working on an

transcendent level, is it effective, does it

reconstellate even-information, how effective is it in

negotiation?

d) The law of necessity, and destiny, what is the extent

of non-deterministic causal volitional freedom

e) Can stillness be used as an ultimate reference to

change or is it an operational misinterpretation?

f) Shelled paradoxes, how does a system behave on

potential stability levels, as differentiated from the

macro-state?

g) To what extent perception codes the holograph key,

whether it is negotiated and permanent, or does loss

of memory, and physical damage can disconnect the work

from progressive build-up?

Example answer after de-scrambling the seal:

Too divided, paradox of order, wrongly posed questions, the

linear structure of human reasoning , require a mind-frame

that is inaccessible to you, de-conditioning perception is

the first stage, if you will liberate yourself in a highly

abstract field that is untaught of by structural human

3

intelligence, trained perception must be shattered for the

purpose of understanding.

Exercise: Framework: Try to isolate the concept of variety out of

immutable movement for the purpose of describing how energy

may be translated as co-ordinated inter-dependent

information.

Attempt to isolate the Abstract Concepts of the

aforementioned statement on the Semantic Level: Associate

Symbols with the concepts; explore their depth: then explore

the cues; or all the aspects of the abstract; the Aspects

are the negotiators and essentialisers that solve the

abstract (and the soaked meanings) through mixing the

energies associated with the aspects together and through

the union of opposites. Since within its logic all languages

are limited, sublimate it up to meta-semantic level.

Depending on the frameworks, sometimes introduction of more

abstracts is required to capture a particular idea; Use

multiple symbols to contain them wholistically; then what is

separate by the minds limitations, becomes unified in the

stream of consciousness (and synthesized by the currents, if

they are willing to respond) although we cannot see the

process, we can extract and reify it again down to

conceptual frameworks and semantic output.

[Wholistic Frame]

Abstract Aspect

Charge Valency

Energy Movement

Variable Signal

Form Shape

Essence Valency

In time, with training, if nothing distracts you, use only

meta-language filtered by a reality-tunnel of choice;

Note: Advanced concepts will always break into simple

statements, unless they are crafted into something dynamic,

‘Living its own life’ having the beauty of movement while

being conceptually fixed and frozen;

4