Upload
others
View
6
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Methods for evaluation of regulation affecting flexibility in energy systems
A review of the literature
Daniel Møller Sneum, Energy Economics and Regulation, DTU Management Engineering, DK
SAEE conference, Luleå, Sweden
August 2016
AGENDA
1. The problem: Why look at methods for evaluation of regulation
2. Method applied: Literature review
3. Tentative results: What does the literature say
4. Tentative analysis: What structures emerge and can they be used for anything?
~Tentative results - Comments most welcome!~
MEET YOUR TEACHING ASSISTANTS
I like qualitative
stuff!
§
I like to model!
Ref: https://larottaperitaca.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/banach-tarski-le-arance-danesi/
HYPOTHESIS: STRUCTURE IS MISSING
• Much has been written on flexibility regarding • Technologies
• Markets
• Systems
• Modelling
• Less on how we overall identify, characterise and evaluate regulation affecting flexibility
Ref: https://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Sperm_whale_skeleton.jpg
RESEARCH QUESTIONS
What is the state of the art on methodologies for evaluation of regulation that affects the flexibility of energy systems?
What elements from those methodologies can be applied to build a comprehensive methodology for evaluation of this type of regulation?
Scope: Energy system with electricity, heat, gas and transport
METHODOLOGY
Why literature review?
• To identify state of the art
• …and gaps
• Build future research on both
Why systematic?
• An approach to literature review that will increase rigor, is replicable and reduce bias
• The contradiction is narrative reviews, which approach the subject more unstructured
WORK IN PROGRESS
Tranfield (2003) defines ten phases:
0. Identification for the need for a review
1. Preparation of a proposal for a review
2. Development of a review protocol
3. Identification of research
4. Selection of studies
5. Study quality assessment
6. Data extraction and monitoring progress
7. Data synthesis
8. The report and recommendations
9. Getting evidence into practice
METHOD
Nvivo for coding of references
Baritaud, Manuel (2012)
International Energy Agency (2014) Keane, Gary (2010)
Miller, M; Bird, L; Cochran, J; Milligan, M; Bazilian, M; Renewable, National; Denny, E; Dillon, J; Bialek, J; Limited, Ecar; Neuhoff, K (2013)
Definition - flexibility resources 0 0 4 0 Market design 2 20 2 8
Operation - utilized flexibility resources 0 1 2 0
50 MOST FREQUENT WORDS
RESULT: EMERGING SUBJECTS
LITERATURE: Investment/adequacy
LITERATURE: (flexible) operation
LITERATURE: Technologies – physical capability of suppling flexibility
RESULT: EMERGING HIERARCHY
Investment/adequacy
(flexible) operation
Flexible technologies – physical ability to supply flexibility
Flexible resources
Available flexible resources
Available flexible resources operated flexibly
HIERARCHY: EXAMPLE WITH CHP
CHPs on the ground
CHPs on the ground, operating flexibly
Combined heat and power plant (CHP)
Flexible resources
Available flexible resources
Available flexible resources operated flexibly
What goes on here? And here?
Picture ref: http://www.publicdomainpictures.net/view-image.php?image=71841&picture=&jazyk=DE
EMERGING STRUCTURE: FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS
Markets 1
Markets 2
Markets 3
Regulation 1
Regulation 2Regulation 3
Regulation 4
Regulation 5
Regulation 6
Flexible resources
Available flexible resources
Available flexible resources operated flexibly
What is holding Available flexible resources back?
What is holding Available flexible
resources operated flexibly
back?
ANSWER: framework conditions
WHAT ARE THE FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS?
LITERATURE: ”Framework conditions are context-specific”
Ref: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Singapore_Road_Signs_-_Temporary_Sign_-_Detour.svg
IT’S A MESS! TAXONOMY
NEEDED!
Ref: https://larottaperitaca.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/banach-tarski-le-arance-danesi/
DETOUR: FINDING THE FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS
Example of taxonomy to identify framework conditions: ORIGIN ACTOR/AREA
External Market
Government/politics
Technology/services suppliers
Designers and manufacturers
Energy suppliers
Capital suppliers
Internal Economic
Behavioural
Organisational
Barriers related to competences
Awareness Cagno et al. (2013)
My kind of work
§
THE FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS - NICE AND STRUCTURED
Markets 1
Markets 2
Markets 3
Regulation 1
Regulation 2Regulation 3
Regulation 4
Regulation 5
Regulation 6
Flexible resources
Available flexible resources
Available flexible resources operated flexibly
WHERE ARE THE FRAMEWORK CONDITIONS PLACED?
Markets 1
Markets 2
Markets 3
Regulation 1
Regulation 2Regulation 3
Regulation 4
Regulation 5
Regulation 6
Flexible resources
Available flexible resources
Available flexible resources operated flexibly
They are identified qualitatively by regulation review…
Finally!
Ref: https://larottaperitaca.wordpress.com/2012/01/12/banach-tarski-le-arance-danesi/
Yes!
§
…but must be confirmed by modelling, due to possible inter-dependencies
SUMMING UP
1. Literature gives us fragments: 1. Technical ability to provide flexibility (Flexible
resources) 2. Investmest and adequacy-related discussions
(Available flexible resources) 3. Flexible operation (Available flexible resources
operated flexibly)
2. We deduct a hierarchy:
3. We ask, “What FCs?” 1. Literature gives us a mess of framework
conditions detour for taxonomy
4. We ask, “Where are the FCs?” 1. Iterative policy review AND modelling
CONCLUDING: HAS CONTENTS, NEEDS STRUCTURE
1: Methodologies for evaluation of regulation that affects the flexibility of energy systems
2: Build a comprehensive methodology for evaluation of this type of regulation
• No systematic methodological considerations have been identified, indicating an absence of methodologies that can addresses the full spectrum of sectors, market frameworks and regulatory frameworks. This potentially limits the identification of low-hanging fruits when identifying, evaluating and addressing the impact of regulation on flexibility.
• Several applied-level examples.
• Evaluation of regulation affecting flexibility is seen addressed in conjunction with more overall considerations on integration of VRE.
• Much on markets; less on the regulatory part. Suggests a need for further considerations and treatment of the subject, for the most part in the scientific literature.
• Methodology developed from elements emerging from literature.
• Criticism of applied method and the developed methodology: • Potential for bias should be addressed.
• Is there a need for it?
REFERENCES (more to come)
• Baritaud, M., 2012. Securing Power during the Transition, Paris.
• Bertsch, J. et al., 2016. Flexibility in Europe’s power sector-An additional requirement or an automatic complement? Energy Economics, 53, pp.118–131.
• Cagno, E. et al., 2013. A novel approach for barriers to industrial energy efficiency. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 19, pp.290–308.
• Cochran, J. et al., 2014. Flexibility in 21 st Century Power Systems, Golden.
• Cochran, J. et al., 2013. Market Evolution: Wholesale Electricity Market Design for 21 st Century Power Systems, Golden. Available at: http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy14osti/57477.pdf.
• Danish Energy Agency, 2015. Flexibility in the Power System - Danish and European experiences, Copenhagen.
• Dragoon, K. & Papaefthymiou, G., 2015. Power System Flexibility Strategic Roadmap - Preparing power systems to supply reliable power from variable energy resources, Berlin. Available at: http://www.leonardo-energy.org/sites/leonardo-energy/files/documents-and-links/strategic_flexibility_roadmap-final-beta_version.pdf.
• ENTSO-E, 2016. ENTSO-E position on the review of the Renewable Energy Directive. Available at: https://www.entsoe.eu/publications/position-papers/position-papers-archive/Pages/Position Papers/ENTSO-E-position-on-the-review-of-the-renewables-energy-directive.aspx [Accessed February 17, 2016].
• EURELECTRIC, 2014. Flexibility and aggregation - requirements for their interaction in the market, Available at: http://www.eurelectric.org/media/115877/tf_bal-agr_report_final_je_as-2014-030-0026-01-e.pdf.
• GE Energy, 2010. Western Wind and Solar Integration Study, New York. Available at: http://www.osti.gov/bridge.
• Gottstein, M. & Skillings, S.A., 2012. Beyond capacity markets - Delivering capability resources to Europe’s decarbonised power system. In 9th International Conference on the European Energy Market, EEM 12. pp. 1–8.
• Henriot, A. & Glachant, J.M., 2013. Melting-pots and salad bowls: The current debate on electricity market design for integration of intermittent RES. Utilities Policy, 27, pp.57–64. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2013.09.001.
• Hvelplund, F., 2001. Electricity Reforms, Democracy and Technological Change, Aalborg: Institute for Development and Planning, Aalborg University.
• IEA, 2014. The power of transformation,
• International Energy Agency, 2016. Re-powering Markets, Paris.
• Keane, G., 2010. Options for low-carbon power sector flexibility to 2050, Oxford.
REFERENCES (more to come)
• Kondziella, H. & Bruckner, T., 2016. Flexibility requirements of renewable energy based electricity systems - A review of research results and methodologies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 53, pp.10–22. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.07.199.
• Lund, H., 2014. Renewable Energy Systems 2nd ed., Aalborg: Academic Press.
• Lund, H. et al., 2013. System and market integration of wind power in Denmark. Energy Strategy Reviews, 1(3), pp.143–156.
• Lund, P.D. et al., 2015. Review of energy system flexibility measures to enable high levels of variable renewable electricity. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 45, pp.785–807. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.01.057.
• Miller, M. et al., 2013. RES-E-NEXT,
• Milligan, M. et al., 2014. Market designs for high levels of variable generation. 2014 IEEE PES General Meeting | Conference & Exposition, (October), pp.1–5. Available at: http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6939455.
• Mott MacDonald, 2015. Integration of Variable Renewables, Brighton.
• Møller Sneum, D. et al., 2016. Framework conditions for flexibility in the district heating-electricity interface, Lyngby. (in press)
• Papaefthymiou, G., Grave, K. & Dragoon, K., 2014. Flexibility options in electricity systems, Berlin. Available at: http://www.ecofys.com/files/files/ecofys-eci-2014-flexibility-options-in-electricity-systems.pdf.
• SWECO, 2015. Study on the effective integration of demand energy recourses for providing flexibility to the electricity system,
• THEMA Consulting Group, 2014. Input to strategy on demand flexibility in the Nordic countries, Oslo.
• Tranfield, D., Denyer, D. & Smart, P., 2003. Towards a methodology for developing evidence-informed management knowledge by means of systematic review *. British Journal of Management, 14, pp.207–222.
• Tuerk, A. & Fruhmann, C., 2016. EMERGING FRAMEWORKS FOR AGGREGATORS IN THE EU,
• Tveten, Å.G., 2015. Renewable energy in Northern European power markets: effects, challenges and integration options. Norwegian University of Life Sciences.
REFERENCES (more to come)