132
Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust Comprehensive Annual Financial Report For The Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 Prepared by the Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Office of the Controller

Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

  • Upload
    others

  • View
    4

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust Comprehensive Annual Financial Report

For The Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Prepared by the Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Office of the Controller

Page 2: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority
Page 3: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Table of Contents

Page Number

Introductory Section (Unaudited) 1 Transmittal Letter from the Chairperson of the Committee 2 Committee Members and Their Responsibilities

4 Consultants and Money Managers 4 Organization

5 Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting 6 Financial Section 7

Independent Auditors’ Report 8 Management's Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited) 11 Basic Financial Statements 15

Statements of Fiduciary Net Position 16 Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 17 Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 18

Required Supplemental Information (Unaudited) 31 Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability 32 Schedule of Employer Contributions 33 Schedule of Money Weighted Rate of Return 33

Other Supplemental Information 35 Schedule of Investment and Administrative Services 36

Investment Section (Unaudited) 37 Overview of the Investment Policy 38 Current Money Managers 40 Investment Values and Returns 43 Trading Fees and Commissions 46 Actuarial Section (Unaudited) 49 Multi-year Information From Prior Years Actuarial Reports 50 Actuary’s 2016 Certification Letter and Valuation Reports 53 Actuary’s GASB 67 and 68 Disclosure Report Fiscal Year October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017

95

Statistical Section (Unaudited)

123 Schedule of Benefit Payments to Participants 124 Schedule of Annual Covered Payroll for Participants 124 Schedule of Participants by Status 125 Schedule of Benefit Payments by Type 125 Schedule of Retired Participants by Type of Benefits 126 Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position 127

Page 4: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority
Page 5: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

1

Introductory Section (Unaudited)

This section provides an overview of the Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report, a transmittal letter from the Chairperson, and information on performance, organizational structure, and responsibility for financial reporting. The prior year Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting is also included.

Page 6: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

2

METROPOLITAN TRANSIT AUTHORITY NON-UNION PENSION PLAN

1900 Main St. Houston, TX 77002

July 21, 2017

Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority (the Plan’s sponsor) of Harris County, Texas (METRO)

Presented are the Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust’s (Plan) Comprehensive Annual Financial Report (CAFR) for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015. The Plan is a defined benefit plan which covers full-time administrative staff and police officers hired before October 1, 2007. New employees hired after that date are placed into a defined contribution plan which is not part of this report. The CAFR has five sections and is the only report which brings together the major financial and management elements of a defined benefit pension plan. The Introductory Section discusses the overview of the CAFR, the Plan’s performance as well as the Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and METRO responsibilities for managing the Plan, and providing accurate financial information.

Committee Members and METRO are dedicated to providing quality financial information and the CAFR has earned the Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting from the Government Finance Officers Association for the last five years.

The CAFR consists of five sections which provide information that is useful in evaluating the Plan’s performance, sustainability and includes:

• Introductory • Financial • Investment • Actuarial • Statistical

Funding Policy and Investment Returns

METRO’s funding policy is to contribute the annual, actuarially determined contribution in equal payments over a 12 month period. Employees do not contribute to the Plan. During 2016, METRO contributed $11.2 million to the Plan. The Plan’s investment rate of return, net of fees, for 2016 was approximately 7.1 percent with a return of 4.3 percent over the last ten years. The Committee continues to work closely with Marquette Associates, Inc., the Plan’s investment advisor, in implementing an investment strategy that will achieve the 6.75 percent investment rate of return adopted in 2014.

Additional information on the Plan’s financial performance is located in the Management Discussion & Analysis which starts on page 11 of this report.

Page 7: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority
Page 8: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

4

Committee Members and Their Responsibilities

METRO’s Board of Directors appoints independent committee members to oversee the administration of the Plan. Committee members act as fiduciaries (based on State of Texas law) and must perform their duties for the exclusive purpose of accumulating sufficient assets to pay retiree benefits as they come due. They follow the prudent person rule when authorizing expenses and implementing the investment policy. Members of the committee are dedicated professionals and included the following as of December 31, 2016:

Debbie Sechler, Chairperson Arthur C. Smiley III Thomas Jasien Sean Cagan Jason Simpson Reynaldo Reza Marcus Smith Ruby Munoz Dang The Committee relies on many professionals with different skills to ensure the Plan is operating as intended and include:

Consultants Service provided Marquette Associates, Inc. Financial advisor Milliman Inc. Actuary Motley Rice, LLC Monitoring / litigation service Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP Legal counsel State Street Bank and Trust Co. Asset custodian, disbursing agent and recordkeeping

Listing of Money Managers and Related Asset Class

Domestic equity Global fixed income Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Core Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Value Brandywine Global Opportunistic Rhumbline Russell Mid Capital Growth Index International equity SSgA Russell 2000 Small Capital Core Thomas White International Channing Capital - Small Capital Value SSgA MSCI ACWI ex Us Index

SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Cap

SSgA Emerging Markets

Individual money managers, their market segment, investment approaches, returns, asset custodians, recordkeeping, trading fees/commissions and independent audits are discussed in the Investment Section (Unaudited) which starts on page 37 of this report.

Page 9: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

5

Organization

The organization listing provides an overview of those involved in supporting the Plan.

• Committee members are responsible for the operation of the Plan. They select the financial advisor, money managers and consultants who report directly to Committee members.

• Support staff is provided by Human Resources and the Finance Department of METRO. • Plan participants are those who are eligible to participate in the Plan. • The financial advisor is responsible for assisting in the development and implementation of an

effective investment policy while monitoring the performance of the money managers and the overall markets where investments are made.

• Money managers are responsible for investing the Plan’s assets. Discussion on money managers begin on page 40.

• Independent administrative support consist of several organization which provide services including legal, actuarial, asset custodial, disbursing agent and independent auditing.

Fees paid to financial advisors, money managers, and independent administrative are presented in the Schedule of Investments and Administrative Services located on page 36.

Pension Committee Members

Plan Participants

Independent Administrtive

SupportMoney

ManagersFinancial Advisor

Support Staff provided by

METRO

Page 10: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

6

The responsibility for the accuracy, reliability and fairness of the presentation of financial information and related disclosures in the Comprehensive Annual Financial Report rests with the Committee and METRO. All disclosures that are necessary to enable the reader to gain an understanding of the Plan’s financial activities have been included. The Committee and METRO are also responsible for ensuring that an adequate internal control structure is in place for preparation of financial information, safeguarding of assets, effective and efficient use of resources and compliance with applicable laws and regulations. The internal control structure has been designed to provide reasonable, but not absolute, assurance that these objectives are met. The concept of reasonable assurance recognizes that: (1) the cost of a control should not exceed the benefits likely to be derived; and (2) the valuation of cost and benefits require estimates and judgment by management. In addition, the Plan is required by state law to have independent certified public accountants perform annual financial audits. The Government Finance Officers Association (GFOA) awarded a Certificate of Achievement for Excellence in Financial Reporting to the Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust for its CAFR for the year ended December 31, 2015. This is the fifth year to receive this award and reflects the commitment to quality financial reporting. In order to receive this award one must publish an easily readable and efficiently organized CAFR report which satisfies generally accepted accounting principles, applicable legal requirements and standards established by the Government Officers Association. A Certificate of Achievement is valid for a period of one year. We believe that our current CAFR will continue to meet the Certificate of Achievement Program's requirements and we are submitting it to the GFOA to determine its eligibility for another certificate.

Page 11: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

7

Financial Section

Page 12: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

8

Page 13: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

9

Page 14: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

10

Page 15: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

11

Management’s Discussion and Analysis (Unaudited)

This discussion and analysis section provides an overview of the performance of the Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust (Plan) and should be read in conjunction with the basic financial statements and the other sections of this report. The Plan is a single employer, defined benefit plan with the goal of accumulating sufficient assets over time to pay retirement benefits and related operating cost. This goal is accomplished by receiving annual contributions from METRO, investment returns on the Plan’s assets and achieving various actuarial assumptions. Employees do not contribute to the Plan, and the Plan does not cover postemployment health care cost. The annual funding requirement and the unfunded pension liability of the Plan are developed each year from an independent actuarial study. Contributions to the Plan are approved by METRO’s Board of Directors as part of METRO’s annual operating budget. Adequate diversification in both markets and money managers continues to be an important part of the Plan’s investment strategy. The Committee reallocated investments during plan year 2016 as follows:

Reallocation of

Investments

(in thousands) Terminated money managers Allianz GI NFJ International Value Trust ($9,400) GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund ($11,300) Reduction in investment balance SSgA Russell 2000 Small Capital Core ($1,500) Channing Capital ($3,000) Reduction in administrative cash balance Administration cash account ($12,980) Total ($38,180)

New money managers for 2016 SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Capital Non-U.S. Core $6,490 SSGA Disciplined Emerging Markets Equity Fund $6,490 SSgA Non-U.S. Large-Cap Index Fund $9,400 Increase in investment balance Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust $15,800 Total reallocation of investments for 2016 $38,180

Page 16: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

12

Financial Highlights

METRO’s 2016 contribution totaled $11.2 million, 100 percent of the actuarially determined contribution. The net pension liability increased by $11.4 million or 12.3 percent during 2016. This increase relates to a loss from implementing an updated actuary experience study and unfavorable demographic experience which were offset by investment gains. A listing of the net pension liability components is located on page 28 of the CAFR.

Changes to the net pension liability are reflected, in thousands, in the following table.

2016

2015

Change

Total pension liability $ 257,379 $ 235,382 $ 21,997 Less fiduciary net position 153,104 142,552 10,552 Net pension liability $ 104,275 $ 92,830 $ 11,445

The total pension liability was determined using an actuarial valuation that is dated January 1 of each year and then projected forward to the measurement date which is December 31 of each year and taking into account any significant changes between the valuation date and the fiscal year end as required by GASB 67. The net position restricted for pensions represents the net assets that are available to pay pension benefits. The complete actuarial valuation and GASB 67 and 68 reports are located in the Actuarial Section of this CAFR.

The two following tables summarize the assets and liabilities and their changes during the last three years that when netted equals the net position restricted for pensions.

Summarized Statement of Fiduciary Net Position (in thousands)

2016 2015 2014 Cash equivalents $ 6,715 $ 19,052 $ 2,613 Investments at fair value 146,415 123,586 143,614 Interest and dividends receivable 137 18 223 Less total liabilities 164 104 243 Net position restricted for pensions $ 153,103 $ 142,552 $ 146,207

The current year decline of cash equivalents relates to completing the reallocation of investments which started in 2015 and completed in 2016. This reallocation primarily transferred funds from active managers to index funds. The 2016 increase and 2015 decline in net position restricted for pensions generally relates to investment returns which were driven by significant changes in market conditions.

Page 17: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

13

Summarized Statement of Fiduciary Net Position

Changes During the Last Three Years (in thousands)

2016 2015 2014 Cash equivalents $ (12,337) $ 16,439 $ 172 Investments at fair value 22,829 (20,028) 4,047 Interest and dividends receivable 119 (205) 163 Less total liabilities 60 (139) 88 Net position restricted for pensions $ 10,551 $ (3,655) $ 4,294

The two following tables summarize the additions and deletions and their changes during the last three years that when netted equals the net position restricted for pensions.

Summarized Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position (in thousands)

2016 2015 2014 Additions Employer contributions $ 11,181 $ 11,249 $ 9,006 Net investment (loss) income 9,971 (5,891) 4,217 Deductions Paid to Plan members and beneficiaries 10,375 8,778 8,704 Administrative services 226 235 225 Changes in net position restricted for pensions 10,551 (3,655) 4,294 Net position restricted for pensions Beginning of the year 142,552 146,207 141,913

End of the year $ 153,103 $ 142,552 $ 146,207

Summarized Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Changes During the Last Three Years

(in thousands) 2016 2015 2014 Additions Employer contributions $ (68) $ 2,243 $ 158 Net investment income 15,862 (10,108) (16,402) Deductions Paid to Plan members and beneficiaries 1,597 74 - Administrative services (9) 10 52 Changes in net position restricted for pensions 14,206 (7,949) (16,296) Net position restricted for pensions Beginning of the year (3,655) 4,294 20,590 End of the year $ 10,551 $ (3,655) $ 4,294

Page 18: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

14

Major activities in the summarized statements of changes in fiduciary net position are discussed below:

Employer contributions declined during 2016 by approximately $68 thousand. This decline occurred as no additional funds were received from the BP oil spill settlement as in 2015 and was offset by an increase in METRO’s annual, actuarially determined contribution. Net investment gain for 2016 was 7.1 percent and consisted of gains in large cap composite of 12.8 percent, global fixed income composite of 2.2 percent, small cap composite of 18.0 percent, mid cap composite of 7.2 percent and international equity composite of 4.6 percent. The Plan’s net loss/income on investments over the last several years generally followed the markets with increases in 2014 and 2016 and a loss in 2015. Benefit payments are made monthly to retirees or the employee can elect a lump-sum payment upon termination. Changes between fiscal years were minimal and generally relate to changes in number of retirees and lump-sum payments. Changes to net position restricted for pensions increased for 2016 primarily due to increase in investment returns. The changes for 2015 and 2014 were minimal (once netted) as contributions and investment earnings were used to cover benefit payments and operating cost.

Results of the Annual Depletion Analysis A depletion analysis is prepared each year by the Plan’s independent actuary. This analysis determines if the projected 6.75 percent net investment rate of return, when combined with projected contribution reduced by projected benefit payments, is adequate to ensure that all retirement benefits will be paid over the life of the Plan. Based on this analysis, no change to the projected net investment rate of return of 6.75 was required when preparing the actuarial calculations included in this CAFR.

Contact information

Please contact the Office of the Controller, Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas, P.O. Box 61429 Houston, Texas 77208-1429 if you have additional questions.

Page 19: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

15

Basic Financial Statements

Page 20: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

16

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Statements of Fiduciary Net Position December 31, 2016 and 2015

2016 2015 Assets Cash equivalents $ 6,714,642 $ 19,051,628 Investments, at fair value: Domestic equities 60,539,520 57,291,982 Global fixed income 51,371,976 46,293,600 International equities 34,504,039 20,000,408 Total investments 146,415,535 123,585,990 Interest and dividends receivable 137,271 18,751 Total assets 153,267,448 142,656,369 Liabilities Accounts payable 121,697 104,549 Securities in transit 42,340 - Total liabilities 164,037 104,549 Net position - restricted for pensions $ 153,103,411 $ 142,551,820

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Plan’s basic financial statements.

Page 21: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

17

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

2016 2015 Additions Employer contributions $ 11,181,136 $ 11,248,671 Investment income / (loss) Interest and dividends 513,330 800,313 Net appreciation / (depreciation) on investments 9,784,962 (6,025,771) Investment income / (loss) 10,298,292 (5,225,458) Less: investment services 327,188 665,458 Net investment income / (loss) 9,971,104 (5,890,916)

Total additions 21,152,240 5,357,755 Deductions Paid to Plan members and beneficiaries 10,374,582 8,777,750 Administrative services 226,067 235,357 Total deductions 10,600,649 9,013,107 Net increase / (decrease) in net position 10,551,591 (3,655,352) Net position - restricted for pensions: Beginning of the year 142,551,820 146,207,172 End of the year $ 153,103,411 $ 142,551,820

The accompanying notes are an integral part of the Plan’s basic financial statements.

Page 22: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

18

Notes to the Basic Financial Statements 1. Overview of the Plan

Plan Descriptions

The Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas (METRO) established the Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust (Plan) during December 1975 for the purpose of accumulating funds to pay retirement benefits and certain related administrative costs. The Plan, closed to new participants on September 30, 2007, is a single employer, non-contributory (since March 1, 1984) defined benefit pension plan which covers full-time police officers and administrative staff. Retirement benefits are established and can be amended by METRO’s Board of Directors. Postemployment healthcare costs are not included in the Plan.

All Plan participants are 100 percent vested and can retire at age 65 (normal retirement age) or with reduced benefits after age 55 with 15 years of credited service. Monthly benefits are calculated using three factors, which include employee’s average earnings for the last three years, number of service years and the retirement factor. The minimum monthly normal retirement benefit is $300 for those who retire at or after age 65 and with 5 years of credited services. The Plan offers several annuity options and a discounted lump sum payment.

To receive a lump sum payment, vested employees must withdraw their funds by the end of the year following their termination. After this time has expired, they must select one of the annuity options upon their eligible retirement date. Employees who are totally disabled will continue to earn service years until their normal retirement age with their compensation, as of their disability date, used to calculate their pension benefit.

Changes in plan participants between January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2015 were:

Participants 2016 2015 Change Active 585 620 (35) Terminated and vested 87 87 - Retired 225 210 15 Disabled - - - Beneficiaries 43 44 (1) Total participants 940 961 (21)

Plan Administration

METRO’s Human Resources Department manages most of the day-to-day activities of the Plan including reviewing retirement options with participants, setting-up retiree payment information with State Street Bank and Trust (payment provider) and responding to various retirement questions. The METRO’s Office of the Controller provides support which includes administering the overall Plan, preparing financial reports, and coordinating and reviewing actuarial information.

Page 23: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

19

Administrative services provided by METRO are not charged to the Plan and not reported as cost in the Statement of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position.

The asset custodian is State Street Bank (a United States federally regulated banking and trust company) which also provides administrative services that include issuing retirees’ monthly checks, lump sum distributions, paying authorized operating expenses and complying with federal tax reporting requirements. The mutual and commingled funds maintain independent asset custodial accounts and issue independently audited financial statements each year. While the Plan is not covered by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, it must comply with Texas state law which covers many topics including:

• An actuarial valuation is performed by an entity that meets specific actuarial experience requirements and files with the State Pension Review Board at least every three years.

• The actuary should make recommendations to ensure the actuarial soundness of the Plan. • An independent actuarial audit is completed every five years with the related report filed

with the State Pension Review Board 30 days after finalizing. • Annual financial reports are to be audited by a certified public accountant and filed with

the State Pension Review Board within 211 days after the close of the Plan’s fiscal year. • Investment managers (money managers) must acknowledge in writing their fiduciary

responsibilities and must be registered under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940. • Plan assets are to be kept in an asset custodian account, and money managers (other than

banks) cannot be an asset custodian. • Evaluation of investment services and performance should be done at frequent intervals.

Plan’s Sponsor Funding Policy

METRO’s funding policy is to annually contribute actuarially determined contributions in equal payments over a 12 month period. Participants do not contribute to the Plan. Contributions to the Plan are authorized by METRO’s Board of Directors as part of their annual budgetary process.

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying basic financial statements of the Plan are presented in accordance with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles established by the Governmental Accounting Standards Board (GASB), which designates accounting principles and financial reporting standards applicable to State and local governmental units including related pension plans.

Basis of Accounting

The basis of accounting is the method by which revenues and expenses are recognized and reported in the Plan’s basic financial statements. The accrual basis of accounting is used by the Plan which requires that revenues, which include contributions and investment income, are recognized when they are earned and expenses are recognized when the liability is incurred. In addition, benefit payments to members are recognized when paid in accordance with the terms of the Plan.

Page 24: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

20

Cash Equivalents

The Plan automatically invests excess cash held by the Plan’s asset custodian into the SSgA U.S. Government Short Term Investment Fund (STIF) which is a commingled fund, and considers this as a cash equivalent. Total amount invested in STIF as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 was $6,714,642 and $19,051,628 which is uninsured by the FDIC and uncollateralized. These funds are available for use to make investments, pay operating expenses, and provide monthly benefits to retirees.

Investment Valuation and Income Recognition

Investments in the international equity mutual funds and commingled funds are valued based on the net asset value per unit which is fair value of the underlying investments on specific valuation dates. If no sales are reported for that day, investments will be valued at the last published sales price, the mean between the last posted bid and ask price or at fair value as determined in good faith by the fund money manager with assistance from their asset custodian or an independent valuation service. Investments made directly in domestic equities are reported at fair value based on a national security exchange. Purchases and sales of investments are recorded on the trade date.

Dividend income is recorded on the ex-dividend date with interest and investment income reported as earned. Realized/Unrealized gains and losses are presented as net appreciation/loss in fair value of investments on the statements of changes in fiduciary net position.

Investment Expenses

Investment expenses incurred directly by the Plan include fees paid to the Plan’s financial advisor and various money managers.

Administrative Expenses

Certain administrative expenses such as custodial account, disbursing agent, actuary, audit and legal services are paid by the Plan from contributions received from METRO. Other administrative costs necessary for the Plan to operate effectively are absorbed by METRO and are not charged to the Plan.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the Plan’s financial statements. Final amounts may change from those estimates.

3. Committee Members, Investment Policy and Investments

Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members (Committee) act as fiduciaries (based on State of Texas law) for the exclusive purpose of accumulating sufficient assets to pay retiree benefits as they come due. They follow the prudent person rule when authorizing expenses and implementing the investment policy.

Page 25: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

21

The Committee’s approved investment policy establishes objectives and guidelines for investing assets held by the Plan and includes methods of managing investment risks.

The Plan uses indexes and active managers in implementing its investment strategy and all money managers have accepted, in writing, the responsibilities of a fiduciary.

Direct investment in domestic equity (not part of an index or mutual fund) is reflected by the ownership of specific stocks. Ownership in the domestic equity index funds, the international mutual equity funds and the global fixed income funds are based on net asset value of the related fund. While the direct investment in domestic stock can be actively traded, the remaining investments must be redeemed with the issuing investment fund.

Additional information on the investment policy, money managers and investment returns is located in the Investment Section (Unaudited) which starts on page 37 of this report. A complete copy of the investment policy can be obtained from METRO’s Office of the Controller.

The Committee’s approved asset allocation policy for the last two years was:

Allocation Asset Class Target Range Domestic equities 27% 17-37% International equities 24% 14-34% Hedge funds 4% 0-9% Real estate 10% 5-15% Global fixed income 35% 25-45%

Fair value of the Plan’s investments by asset class, percentage of the portfolio and the change between December 31, 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

2016 % 2015 % Change Domestic equity $ 60,539,520 41.3% $ 57,291,982 46.4% $ 3,247,538 International equity 34,504,039 23.6% 20,000,408 16.2% 14,503,631 Global fixed income 51,371,976 35.1% 46,293,600 37.4% 5,078,376 Total investments $ 146,415,535 100.0% $ 123,585,990 100.0% $ 22,829,545

The projected long-term expected rate of return on pension plan investments was developed using a building-block method in which the best-estimate ranges of expected future real rates of returns (expected returns, net of pension plan investment expense and inflation) were developed for each major asset class. These ranges are combined to produce the projected long-term expected rate of return by weighting the expected future real rates of return by the target asset allocation percentage

Page 26: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

22

and by adding expected inflation. The best estimates of the projected arithmetic, real rates of return for each major asset class included in the Plan’s target asset allocation as of January 1, 2016 and January 1, 2015 are listed below.

Actual Allocation Long-term Expected Real Rate of Return

Asset Class Index 2016 2015 2016 2015 Cash Citigroup 90-Day T-Bills 4.38% 4.26% 0.50% 0.65% Core Fixed Income Barclays Aggregate 33.56% 32.47% 1.68% 2.12% Large Cap US Equities S&P 500 23.01% 45.60% 3.70% 3.95% Mid Cap US Equities Russell Mid Caps 3.80% - 3.85% - Small Cap US Equities Russell 2000 12.72% 10.50% 4.20% 4.35% Developed Foreign Equities MSCI EAFE 22.53% 7.22% 4.50% 4.45% Assumed Inflation – Mean - - - 2.30% 2.30% Assumed Standard Deviation - - - 1.85% 2.00% Portfolio Arithmetic Mean Return - - - 6.36% 6.53% Portfolio Standard Deviation - - - 10.61% 11.49%

Projected Long-term Expected Investment Rate of Return - - - 6.75%

6.75%

Investments Returns The money-weighted rate of return, calculated by the actuary for 2016 and 2015 was a positive 6.98 percent and negative (4.00) percent respectively. This calculation considers the changing amounts actually invested during a period and weights the amount of pension plan investments by the proportion of time they are available to earn a return during the period. The money-weighted rate of return calculation was developed net of investment expenses, and is required by GASB.

The financial advisor uses the time-weighted rate of return (geometric method), which is the industry standard, when calculating investment rate of returns. This rate is included in the investment section of this report and the performance reports provided to the Committee. Based on this method, the investment rate of return, net of investment expenses, was also a positive 7.1 percent for 2016 and negative (4.0) percent for 2015.

The Plan’s investment policy limits concentration risk and the Plan did not own any investments of a single issuer whose value exceeded 5 percent of the Plan’s net position.

Types of Investment Risks

Investing has several types of risks some of which include; custodial, credit, investment concentration, foreign currency, and interest rate. The Plan manages these risks by using an independent asset custodian (State Street Bank and Trust Company), compliance monitoring by the financial advisor, reviewing independent financial audits of the mutual and commingled funds, and allocation of investment dollars among multiple money managers who operate in separate markets and whose performance is measured using difference indexes.

Page 27: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

23

Asset Custodian

State Street Bank and Trust Company is the Plan’s asset custodian. Investments made by the domestic (non-commingled and index fund) money managers are held directly by the Plan’s assets custodian in the name of the Plan. Investments made by mutual and commingled funds are held by their independent asset custodian with the net asset value reported to the Plan’s asset custodian by the related money manager. In addition to the independent asset custodian, the mutual and commingled funds issue independently audited annual financial reports and must comply with oversight rules issued by governmental agencies. Additional information for each money manager is located in the Investment Section (Unaudited) which starts on page 37 of this report.

Managing investment concentration, credit and foreign currency risk Domestic Equities The maximum weighting (at time of purchase) in any one company of the investment manager’s portfolio holdings do not exceed 8 percent or 5 percent more than the index weight, whichever is greater.

International Equities The maximum weighting (at time of purchase) in any one company does not exceed 7 percent. Currency hedging, foreign exchange contracts and similar strategies are permitted as part of a defensive strategy to protect the portfolio assets and enhance returns.

Global Fixed Income The global fixed income portfolio may include both domestic and/or international fixed income securities. Unless authorized by the Plan in advance and in writing, the minimum quality rating of an investment is BBB-. For an issue that is not rated, the security must be of “equivalent” quality to a BBB- rating or above in the opinion of the investment manager, or the security must be a government bond or a bond of a supranational authority which does not have a recognized credit rating.

The maximum holding (cost basis) in any one security does not exceed 5 percent, excluding AAA rated sovereign debt. To manage currency risk, no investment manager shall have exposure to any one currency exceeding 70 percent for the Euro, 50 percent for the Japanese Yen, 40 percent for British Sterling and 25 percent for others excluding the U.S. Dollar. Currency hedging, foreign exchange contracts and similar strategies are permitted as part of a defensive strategy to protect the portfolio assets and enhance returns.

Interest Rate Risk

A change in interest rate will affect the underlying value of global fixed income investments. Generally, increases in interest rates will reduce the value of the investment portfolio while a decrease in interest rates will increase the value of such portfolio. To manage this risk, the Plan’s financial advisor monitors the duration of each fixed income money manager’s portfolio in relation to the appropriate benchmark indexes they track. Significant variances from the benchmark are discussed with Committee members and the related money manager.

Page 28: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

24

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund had a modified duration of 6.6 years while the benchmark (Citigroup WGBI (USD)) was 7.65 years. Brandywine concentrates investments where they believe value is greatest; as a result, their portfolios tend to have an intermediate to long duration bias when real interest rates are high. Greater interest rate exposure is assumed in countries with more value and positions are established along the yield curve where it finds the best risk/reward profile.

Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust duration was 6.12 years while the benchmark (Barclays Aggregate Bond index) duration was 6.17 years.

Additional credit risk disclosure The two international fixed income funds invest in developed and emerging markets sovereign debt. While the funds themselves have not been rated by any nationally recognized rating agency, most of their investments are rated as discussed above.

4. Fair Value Measurement

During 2016 the Plan implemented Governmental Accounting Standards Board Statement No. 72 Fair Value Measurement and Application. This standard established a hierarchy which is based on the valuation inputs used to measure the fair value of the asset. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets; Level 2 inputs are other significant observable inputs; Level 3 inputs are significant unobservable inputs. METRO uses information provided by State Street Bank and Trust, the asset custodian, and Marquette Associates, Financial Advisor, when reporting the fair value of its investments.

Fair value of Plan’s investments for 2016 and 2015 using the reporting hierarchy are:

Investments measured at fair value: Total 2016 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Common Stocks 18,513,015$ 18,513,015 - - Total investments, measured at fair value 18,513,015$ 18,513,015 - -

Investments measured at net asset value (NAV) Unfunded

Commitments RedemptionFrequency

RedemptionNotice Period

Global Fixed Income Fund *1 14,317,561$ N/A Daily T-10 Core Fixed Income Fund *2 37,054,415 N/A Daily T-1 Large-Cap Core Fund *3 29,294,157 N/A Daily T-1 Large-Cap Value Fund *4 6,353,557 N/A Daily T-1 Emerging Markets Fund *5 7,700,025 N/A Daily T-2 Non-U.S.Large-Cap Core Fund *6

Thomas White 10,084,709 N/A Monthly T-10/T-30(>$10 million) SSgA MSCI SCWI ex US 9,756,077 N/A Daily T-2

Non-U.S.Small-Cap Core Fund *7 6,963,227 N/A Thrice-Monthly T-2 Small-Cap Core Fund *8 6,378,792 N/A Daily T-2 Total investments measured at NAV 127,902,520 Total investments, at fair value 146,415,535$

Page 29: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

25

*1. Global Fixed Income Fund - Brandywine Global Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (BGOFIF) is a separate portfolio of the Brandywine Global Investment Management Trust (the Trust). The Trust was organized on May 1, 2006 by Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Delaware, and registered as an investment advisor under the Investment Advisor Act of 1940. The Trust was organized with the objective of achieving interest income, long-term capital appreciation by investing in U.S. fixed income, and developing and emerging markets sovereign debt securities. Annual financial statements of BGOFIF were audited by Kreischer Miller with the trustee of the fund, BNY Mellon, providing custodial and recordkeeping services.

*2. Core Fixed Income Fund - Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust is managed to track as close as practical to the Barclays Aggregate Bond index. State Street Bank and Trust Company is the trustee and provides custodial and record-keeper services. The annual financial reports were audited by BKD LLP, CPAs & Advisors.

*3. Large-Cap Core Fund - Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large-Cap Core index portfolio is managed to track as close as practical to the related index. State Street Bank and Trust Company provides custodial and recordkeeping services. The annual financial report was audited by BKD LLP, CPAs & Advisors.

*4. Large-Cap Value Fund - Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Value index portfolio is managed to track as close as practical to the related index. State Street Bank and Trust Company provides custodial and recordkeeping services. The annual financial report was audited by BKD LLP, CPAs & Advisors.

*5. Emerging Markets Fund - SSgA MSCI Emerging Markets Index Non-Lending Fund approximately as closely as practicable, before expenses, the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over the long-term. State Street Bank is trustee and provides custodial and record-keeper services. As of April 1, 2017, State Street Global Advisors Trust Company, a wholly –owned subsidiary of State Street Bank

Investments measured at fair value: Total 2015 Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Common Stocks 19,086,209$ 19,086,209 - - Total investments, measured at fair value 19,086,209$ 19,086,209 - -

Investments measured at net asset value (NAV) Unfunded

Commitments RedemptionFrequency

RedemptionNotice Period

Global Fixed Income Fund *1 13,606,257$ N/A Daily T-10 Core Fixed Income Fund *2 20,855,314 N/A Daily T-1 Large-Cap Core Fund *3 26,157,500 N/A Daily T-1 Large-Cap Value Fund *4 5,421,922 N/A Daily T-1 Non-U.S.Large-Cap Core Fund *6

Thomas White 10,384,463 N/A Monthly T-10/T-30(>$10 million) SSgA MSCI SCWI ex US 9,615,945 N/A Daily T-2

Small-Cap Core Fund *8 6,626,350 N/A Daily T-2 Emerging Fixed Income Fund *9 11,832,030 N/A Weekly T-5 Total investments measured at NAV 104,499,781 Total investments, at fair value 123,585,990$

Page 30: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

26

became the trustee of the fund. State Street Global Advisors, a division of State Street Bank is the Fund’s Investment Manager. The annual financial reports were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

*6. Non-U.S. Large-Cap Core Fund - SSgA MSCI ACWI ex U.S. Index seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of a broad-based index of world (ex-U.S.) equity markets over the long term. The Fund has nine individual Trustees. SSgA Funds Management Inc. acts as Investment Adviser and Administrator. State Street Bank and Trust Company provides custodial services and acts as sub-administrator. The annual financial reports were audited by Ernst & Young LLP. Thomas White International Fund Investor Class is designed to benefit from opportunities for future economic growth in developed countries outside the United States, as well as the world’s emerging market countries. Portfolio holdings are principally in securities issued by large companies located in Non-U.S. markets, or whose businesses are closely associated with overseas markets. The investment portfolio of the fund may also include securities issued by smaller companies. This is an open end mutual fund and was established in June 1994. The annual financial report was audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP with the Northern Trust Company providing administration and custodial services.

Securities are listed or traded on a recognized national or foreign stock exchange or NASDAQ and valued at the last reported sales price on the principal exchange on which the securities are traded. Over-the-counter securities and listed securities for which no closing sale price is reported are valued at the mean between the last current bid and asked price.

Securities and assets for which quotations are not readily available, including restricted securities and securities purchased in private transactions, may be valued based on recent bid/ask prices or sales prices reported by third party sources such as publications and broker-dealers or valued at their fair value in the best judgment and sole discretion of the Administrator with the oversight of the Investment Manager. *7. Non-U.S.Small-Cap Core Fund - SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index Securities Lending Fund approximately as closely as practicable, before expenses, the performance of the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index over the long-term. State Street Bank is trustee and provides custodial and record-keeper services. As of April 1, 2017, State Street Global Advisors Trust Company, a wholly–owned subsidiary of State Street Bank became the trustee of the fund. State Street Global Advisors, a division of State Street Bank is the Fund’s Investment Manager. The annual financial reports were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. *8. Small-Cap Core Fund - SSgA Russell 2000 Index Securities Lending Fund: Small-Cap Core tracks as closely as practical to the related index. State Street Bank and Trust Company, the Plan’s asset custodian, provides custodial and recordkeeping services. As of April 1, 2017, State Street Global Advisors Trust Company, a wholly –owned subsidiary of State Street Bank became the trustee of the fund. State Street Global Advisors, a division of State Street Bank is the Fund’s Investment Manager. The annual financial report was audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP. *9. Emerging Fixed Income Fund - GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund PLC (GMO) is a limited liquidity investment company created under the laws of Ireland as a public limited company pursuant to the Companies Acts, 1963 to 2013. It was incorporated on May 20, 2003, under registration number 371261. The investment objective of GMO is to achieve higher total returns by investing at least 50 percent of its net assets in government securities of emerging countries, related derivatives securities and in GMO Alpha LIBOR (Offshore), L.P., Series (ALP-B), a Bermuda exempted limited partnership.

Page 31: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

27

The fund may also hold securities by investing in other collective investment schemes. Annual financial statements were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers, Chartered Accountants and Statutory Audit Firm Dublin, Ireland. Asset custodial and recordkeeping services are provided by State Street, Ireland.

Investments are valued at fair value using official closing price or last sales price on the primary exchange or market where the investments are traded. The asset custodian will use State Street Fund Services (Ireland) Limited (the Administrator) to independently determine fair value when information is not available or the amount currently reported may not be representative of fair value. This information is used when calculating the net asset value per share.

5. Actuarial Assumptions

The Actuarially Determined Contribution (ADC) is calculated annually by an independent actuary using information furnished by METRO and actuarial assumptions approved by the Plan’s Committee.

Actuarial Methods and Assumptions Used for Valuation and Determining The ADC Valuation date January 1, 2016 Measurement date December 31, 2016 Actuarial cost method Entry Age Normal Amortization Method Level percent or level dollar Level dollar Closed, open, or layered periods Closed Amortization Period at 1/1/2016 27 years Asset Valuation method Smoothing period Five-year smoothed fair value Recognition method Non-asymptotic Inflation rate 2.30% Salary increase 2.5% per annum

Discount rate 6.75% Cost of living None Retirement Age Retirement rates are located in actuarial section of this report Mortality RP-2014 Mortality adjusted backwards to 2006 with MP-2014 and

projected forward (fully generational) with MP-2015

The Plan’s actuary completed an experience study analysis in 2016 which resulted in updates to the disability, withdrawal and retirement rates. In addition, the mortality table was updated to reflect the RP-2014 Mortality Table adjusted backwards to 2006 with Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014 and projected with Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2015 (separate tables for males/female).

These changes, which generally reflect improvements in life expectancy, were included in the 2016 actuarial valuation and resulted in an increase to the net pension liability.

Actuarial assumptions used in the annual actuarial evaluation processes represent the best estimates of the Plan’s current and future activities as recommend by the actuary and approved by the Committee. They are intended to reflect a long-term perspective while reducing short-term volatility. Since the actuarially determined contribution to the Plan and the disclosure related to the net pension liability,

Page 32: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

28

discussed below, are based on actuarial assumptions, including the cost method used by the actuary, any future changes to those assumptions or the cost method may affect the future funded status, funding progress, and the net pension liability.

The Plan’s independent actuary completed a formal actuarial experience study during 2016. Based on this study, the Plan’s net pension liability calculated under GASB 67 and 68 for December 31, 2015 used the RP-2014 Mortality Table adjusted backwards to 2006 with MP-2014 projected forward (fully generational) with MP2015. Separate tables were used for males/females. In addition, the disability, withdrawal and retirements rates were updated. These changes were included in the January 1, 2016 valuation used to determine the ADC valuation.

6. Net Pension Liability and Sensitivity Analysis

The following tables were taken from the independent actuary’s GASB 67 Disclosure Report dated June 9, 2017. This report, along with the actuary’s certification letter is included in the actuarial section of the CAFR.

Significant actuarial assumption used to calculate the net pension liability was:

Inflation rate 2.3% Salary increase 2.75% Discount rate 6.75% Net Investment rate of return 6.75% Actuarial cost method Entry Age Normal Closed, open, or layered

Closed

Mortality The RP-2014 Mortality adjusted backwards to 2006 with MP-2014 projected forward (fully generational) with MP-2016. Separate tables were used for males/females

The mortality table was updated to the recently published RP-2014 Mortality Table adjusted backwards to 2006 with Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2014 and projected with Mortality Improvement Scale MP-2016 (separate tables for males/female); salary increase assumption was increased to 2.75 percent from 2.5 percent; and lump sum election assumption was decreased to 50 percent from 85 percent. These changes were made to better reflect anticipated future plan experience.

The net pension liability represents the total pension liability which is the actuarial present value of benefits payable to participants as of the valuation date reduced by the Plan’s year-end net position restricted for pension. These amounts consisted of:

December 31, 2016

December 31, 2015

Total pension liability $ 257,378,665 $ 235,381,436 Plan’s fiduciary net position 153,103,411 142,551,820 Net pension liability $ 104,275,254 $ 92,829,616 Plan’s fiduciary net position as a % of total pension liability

59.49%

60.56%

Page 33: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

29

The sensitivity analysis schedule, provided below, is used to evaluate the effect on the total pension liability and related net pension liability for a 1 percent change in the discount rate as of December 31, 2016.

1% Decrease to

5.75%

Current Discount Rate

of 6.75%

1% Increase to

7.75% Total pension liability $ 281,455,693 $ 257,378,665 $ 236,898,995 Plan’s fiduciary net position 153,103,411 153,103,411 153,103,411 Net pension liability $ 128,352,282 $ 104,275,254 $ 83,795,584

7. Federal Income Tax

The Plan received its latest favorable letter of determination dated July 9, 2014 from the Internal Revenue Service stating the Fund qualifies as a tax-exempt plan and trust. The Plan’s management believe the Plan is currently designed and being operated in compliance with the applicable requirements of the Internal Revenue Code.

Generally Accepted Accounting Principles in the United States of America require the Plan’s management to evaluate tax positions taken by the Plan and recognize a tax liability (or asset) if the Plan has taken an uncertain position that more likely than not would not be sustained upon examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The Plan’s management has analyzed the tax positions taken by the Plan, and has concluded that as of December 31, 2016, and 2015, there are no uncertain positions taken or expected to be taken that would require recognition of a liability (or asset) or disclosure in the Plan’s financial statements. The Plan is subject to routine audits by taxing jurisdictions.

8. Risks and Uncertainties

Investment securities are exposed to various risks, as discussed in Note 3 above, including market volatility. Significant changes in the value of investments can have a direct and material effect on the net position restricted for pensions and net pension liability. The Plan’s Committee has taken steps to minimize these risks by maintaining a diversified investment portfolio and hiring professionals to assist in managing the Plan and its assets.

The actuary, as discussed in Note 5 and 6 above, used actuarial assumptions when calculating the Plan’s funding requirements, pension liability and other actuarial information. Due to uncertainties inherent in the estimation and assumptions process, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in these actuarial assumptions in the near term could be material to the Plan’s financial statements.

9. New Accounting Pronouncements

Governmental Accounting Standard Board (GASB) routinely issues new accounting and reporting statements which become effective in future years. The following list reflects those statements which may impact the accounting and reporting for pension plans and include:

Page 34: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

Notes to the 2016 Basic Financial Statements for the Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas

Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

30

GASB Statement Number Effective Date 73 - Accounting and Financial Reporting for Pensions and Related Assets That Are Not within the Scope of GASB Statement 68, and Amendments to Certain Provisions of GASB Statements 67 and 68

Reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016

82 - Pension Issues—an amendment of GASB Statements No. 67, No. 68, and No. 73

Reporting periods beginning after June 15, 2016

Plan management is currently evaluating these new pronouncements to determine the impact, if any, on the accounting and reporting of the Plan’s financial activities.

10. Subsequent Events

The Plan’s management has evaluated subsequent events through July 21, 2017; the date the Plan’s financial statements were available to be issued. No changes were made, or are necessary to be made, to the Plan’s financial statements, as a result of this evaluation.

Page 35: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

31

Required Supplemental Information (Unaudited)

Page 36: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

32

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Schedule of Changes in Net Pension Liability (Unaudited)

December 31,

December 31,

December 31,

2016 2015 2014 Total pension liability Changes for the year Service cost $3,465,270 $2,782,533 $2,753,593 Interest on total pension liability 16,607,887

15,165,652

13,384,981 Effect of economic /demographic gains/losses 9,768,147

6,720,589

- Effect of assumptions changes or inputs 2,530,507

12,232,736

- Benefit payments (10,374,582)

(8,777,750)

(8,704,519) Net change in total pension liability 21,997,229

28,123,760

7,434,055 Total pension liability - beginning 235,381,436

207,257,676

199,823,621 Total pension liability - ending 257,378,665

235,381,436

207,257,676

Plan fiduciary net position Contributions from the employer 11,181,136

11,248,671

9,006,301 Net investment income 9,971,104

(5,890,916)

4,217,106 Benefit payments (10,374,582)

(8,777,750)

(8,704,519) Administrative expenses (226,067)

(235,357)

(224,559) Net change in plan fiduciary net position 10,551,591

(3,655,352) 4,294,329 Plan fiduciary net position – beginning 142,551,820

146,207,172

141,912,843 Plan fiduciary net position – ending 153,103,411

142,551,820

146,207,172

METRO’s net pension liability ending $104,275,254 $92,829,616 $61,050,504

Plan fiduciary net position as a percentage of the total pension liability

59.49% 60.56% 70.54%

Covered-employee payroll $46,853,004 $44,837,816 $45,601,509 METRO’s net pension liability as a percentage of covered employee payroll

222.56% 207.03% 133.88%

Notes:

(1) Increase in the ending net pension liability for 2016 relates to changing actuarial assumptions, based on the 2016 experience study, using an updated mortality table and loss on investments.

(2) GASB Statement No.67 permits plans to present the ten years historical information prospectively until such information is available.

Page 37: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

33

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Schedule of Employer Contributions For the Last 10 Years

(Unaudited)

Fiscal Year Ending

December 31,

Actuarially Determined Contribution

Actual

Employer Contribution

Excess Contribution

Covered Payroll

Contribution as a % of Covered Payroll

2016 $11,181,136 $11,181,136 - $ 46,853,004 23.86% 2015 $ 8,911,253 $11,248,671 $ (2,337,418) 44,837,816 25.09% 2014 9,006,301 9,006,301 - 45,601,509 19.75% 2013 8,847,436 8,847,436 - 44,388,906 19.93% 2012 8,215,493 8,215,493 - 47,184,896 17.41% 2011 10,689,258 10,689,264 (6) 57,702,434 18.52% 2010 10,833,143 11,143,438 (310,295) 56,962,295 19.56% 2009 12,652,758 12,652,758 - 63,625,252 19.89% 2008 8,948,287 8,948,287 - 62,929,627 14.22% 2007 9,503,253 13,503,253 (4,000,000) 64,349,486 20.98%

Note: Actuarial assumptions used to determine actuarially determined contribution is presented in Note 4to the basic financial statements.

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Schedule of Money Weighted Rate of Return For the Last 10 Years

(Unaudited)

December 31,

Net Money-Weighted

Rate of Return

2016 6.98

2015 (4.00)

2014 3.49

2013 17.42

2012 17.06

2011 (0.51)

2010 16.48

2009 29.13

2008 (32.44)

2007 6.79

Page 38: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

34

Page 39: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

35

Other Supplemental Information (Unaudited)

Page 40: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

36

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Schedule of Investment and Administrative Services for the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015

Type 2016 2015 Investment services Direct payments to money managers Brandywine $ 66,784 $ 136,610 GMO - rebate (2,172) (9,613) SSgA - Value - 15,055 SSgA - Growth - 17,742 SSgA – Emerging Markets 9,669 - Channing 98,679 69,890 Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Core 10,000 7,125 Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust 45,370 84,732 Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Value

10,000 19,720

Rhumbline Russell Mid Capital Growth 9,934 181 Allianz NFJ International 27,036 87,315 LSIA Equal Weighted Index - 7,958 Herndon Capital Management - 35,679 GW Capital - 40,430 Brown Large Cap Growth (112) 31,671 Morgan Dempsey - 92,263 Total of all money managers 275,188 636,758 Financial advisor Gray and Company - 10,500 Financial advisor Marquette Associates, Inc. 52,000 18,200 Total investment services 327,188 665,458 Administrative services Audit Services - McConnell & Jones LLP 29,724 32,000 Legal counsel – Norton Rose Fulbright US LLP 19,526 17,364 Custodian and disbursement agent - State Street

113,644 94,981 Actuary – Milliman, Inc. 62,181 90,294 Other 992 718 Total administrative services 226,067 235,357 Total investment and administrative services $ 553,255 $ 900,815

Note: Direct administrative supporting costs are absorbed by METRO and not borne by the Plan. Hence, such costs were excluded from this schedule.

Page 41: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

37

Investment Section

(Unaudited) The investment policy, the year-end performance report provided by Marquette Associates, Inc. and independently audited financial reports for the commingled and mutual fund money managers were used to develop this section.

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 42: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

38

Overview of the Investment Policy General

The Committee’s responsibilities include establishing, implementing and updating an investment policy which provides the framework for making and monitoring investment performance. A copy of this policy can be obtained by contacting METRO’s Office of the Controller. Key points of the policy include:

1. Establish reasonable expectation, objective and guidelines for the investment of the assets in the Fund.

2. Create the framework for a well-diversified asset mix that can be expected to generate achievable long-term returns at a level of risk acceptable to the Plan including: • Describing an appropriate risk position for the investments of the Plan. • Specifying broad target asset allocation ranges and constraints. • Establishing investment guidelines regarding the selection of investment managers,

permissible securities, and diversification of assets. • Specifying the criteria for evaluating and reporting on the performance of the Plan’s

investment managers. 3. Define the responsibilities of the Committee, financial advisor, money managers and plan

administrator. 4. Encourage effective communication between all participants.

Financial advisor

The financial advisor, Marquette Associates, Inc., is responsible for assisting in the development and implementation an effective investment policy while monitoring the performance of the money managers and the overall markets where investments are made.

Investment objective

The Committee invests using a long-term view with the objective of achieving the actuarial rate of return of 6.75 percent net of related investment fees. A period of five to seven years is used in measuring progress toward achieving this objective. Returns on the traditional asset classes within the Plan’s investment pool (Total Domestic Equity and Total Fixed Income) should exceed the return on a composite of non-managed market indices weighted in proportion to the actual structure of the Plan’s portfolio. Generally, the investment portfolio should benefit from active management.

Marketability and investment values

Investments are limited to those that are readily marketable with the exception of certain categories such as real estate and certain alternative investments. No investment should be made in non-marketable securities without prior approval from the Committee.

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 43: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

39

Asset values are generally established based on national securities exchange with specific valuation approaches discussed within the description of active money managers portion of this section.

Diversification

Effective diversification is maintained by allocating funds to various asset classes and money managers who invest in different markets using various investment strategies as discussed in the following pages.

During 2016 the investment policy reflects the following type and range of investments.

Allocation Asset Class Target Range Domestic equities 27% 17-37% International equities 24% 14-34% Hedge funds 4% 0-9% Real estate 10% 5-15% Global fixed income 35% 25-45%

The actual allocation of assets as of December 31, 2016, in thousands, complied with the investment guidelines as reflected in the following table with the exception of real estate which continues to be evaluated.

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Global Fixed Income, $60,539 , 41%

International Equity, $34,504 , 24%

Domestic Equity, $51,371 , 35%

Page 44: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

40

Current Money Managers In addition to asset allocation, money managers are essential in earning adequate investment returns. The Plan ended the year with eleven money managers that are responsible for implementing the investment policy and related strategy by directly purchasing/selling investments. The Committee and financial advisor follow a stringent money manager selection process some of which include: evaluating investment strategy and investment team continuity, reviewing performance history, performing on-site visits, and conducting multiple interviews. Only upon completion of this process will the Committee vote on the final selection of a money manager.

All money managers are required to accept the role of a fiduciary as defined by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act. To ensure a diversified investment portfolio, the Committee selects money managers that invest in different parts of the worldwide markets using different investment strategies.

During 2016 the Committee elected to reallocate investments which included:

Reallocation of

Investments

(in thousands) Terminated money managers Allianz GI NFJ International Value Trust ($9,400) GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund ($11,300) Reduction in investment balance SSgA Russell 2000 Small Capital Core ($1,500) Channing Capital ($3,000) Reduction in administrative cash balance Administration cash account ($12,980) Total ($38,180)

New money managers for 2016 SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Capital Non-U.S. Core $6,490 SSGA Disciplined Emerging Markets Equity Fund $6,490 SSgA Non-U.S. Large-Cap Index Fund $9,400 Increase in investment balance Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust $15,800 Total reallocation of investments for 2016 $38,180

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 45: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

41

Individual money managers, their market segment, investment approaches, asset custodians, recordkeeping and independent audits are discussed below.

Domestic Equity

Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large-Cap Core index portfolio is managed to track as close as practical to the related index. State Street Bank and Trust Company provides custodial and recordkeeping services. The annual financial report was audited by BKD LLP, CPAs & Advisors.

Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Value index portfolio is managed to track as close as practical to the related index. State Street Bank and Trust Company provides custodial and recordkeeping services. The annual financial report was audited by BKD LLP, CPAs & Advisors.

Rhumbline Russell Mid-Capital Growth index portfolio is a separately managed account which is designed to track as closely as practical to the related index. The Plan’s asset custodian, State Street Bank and Trust Company, provides custodial and recordkeeping services. The annual financial report was audited by BKD LLP, CPAs & Advisors.

SSgA Russell 2000 Index Securities Lending Fund: Small-Cap Core tracks as closely as practical to the related index. State Street Bank and Trust Company, the Plan’s asset custodian, provides custodial and recordkeeping services. As of April 1, 2017 State Street Global Advisors Trust Company, a wholly –owned subsidiary of State Street Bank became the trustee of the fund. State Street Global Advisors, a division of State Street Bank is the Fund’s Investment Manager. The annual financial report was audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Channing Capital – Small Capital Value equity portfolio consists of 40 to 50 small-to-medium-sized companies that are considered to be high-quality but currently undervalued based on their analysis. The investment objective is to exceed the Russell 2500 Value Index over a full market cycle. No independent audit is required since this is a separately managed account and the Plan’s asset custodian, State Street Bank and Trust Company provides custodial and recordkeeping services.

International equity (mutual funds)

Thomas White International Fund Investor Class is designed to benefit from opportunities for future economic growth in developed countries outside the United States, as well as the world’s emerging market countries. Portfolio holdings are principally in securities issued by large companies located in Non-U.S. markets, or whose businesses are closely associated with overseas markets. The investment portfolio of the fund may also include securities issued by smaller companies. This is an open end mutual fund and was established in June 1994. The annual financial report was audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP with the Northern Trust Company providing administration and custodial services.

Securities are listed or traded on a recognized national or foreign stock exchange or NASDAQ and valued at the last reported sales price on the principal exchange on which the securities are traded. Over-the-counter securities and listed securities for which no closing sale price is reported are valued at the mean between the last current bid and asked price.

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 46: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

42

Securities and assets for which quotations are not readily available, including restricted securities and securities purchased in private transactions, may be valued based on recent bid/ask prices or sales prices reported by third party sources such as publications and broker-dealers or valued at their fair value in the best judgment and sole discretion of the Administrator with the oversight of the Investment Manager. SSgA MSCI ACWI ex U.S. Index seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the total return performance of a broad-based index of world (ex-U.S.) equity markets over the long term. The Fund has nine individual Trustees. SSgA Funds Management Inc. acts as Investment Adviser and Administrator. State Street Bank and Trust Company provides custodial services and acts as sub-administrator. The annual financial reports were audited by Ernst & Young LLP. SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index Securities Lending Fund approximately as closely as practicable, before expenses, the performance of the MSCI EAFE Small Cap Index over the long-term. State Street Bank is trustee and provides custodial and record-keeper services. As of April 1, 2017, State Street Global Advisors Trust Company, a wholly–owned subsidiary of State Street Bank became the trustee of the fund. State Street Global Advisors, a division of State Street Bank is the Fund’s Investment Manager. The annual financial reports were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

SSgA MSCI Emerging Markets Index Non-Lending Fund approximately as closely as practicable, before expenses, the performance of the MSCI Emerging Markets Index over the long-term. State Street Bank is trustee and provides custodial and record-keeper services. As of April 1, 2017 State Street Global Advisors Trust Company, a wholly –owned subsidiary of State Street Bank became the trustee of the fund. State Street Global Advisors, a division of State Street Bank is the Fund’s Investment Manager. The annual financial reports were audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP.

Global fixed income

Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust is managed to track as close as practical to the Barclays Aggregate Bond index. State Street Bank and Trust Company is the trustee and provides custodial and record-keeper services. The annual financial reports were audited by BKD LLP, CPAs & Advisors.

Brandywine Global Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (BGOFIF) is a separate portfolio of the Brandywine Global Investment Management Trust (the Trust). The Trust was organized on May 1, 2006 by Brandywine Global Investment Management, LLC, a corporation organized under the laws of the state of Delaware, and registered as an investment advisor under the Investment Advisor Act of 1940. The Trust was organized with the objective of achieving interest income, long-term capital appreciation by investing in U.S. fixed income, and developing and emerging markets sovereign debt securities. Annual financial statements of BGOFIF were audited by Kreischer Miller with the trustee of the fund, BNY Mellon, providing custodial and recordkeeping services.

Investments are valued at fair value based on market valuations provided by independent pricing services or based on values determined in good faith by the investment advisor. This information is used when calculating the net asset value per unit.

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 47: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

43

Proxy Voting The Investment Policy requires investment managers to vote in the best interest of the Plan and must be able to support all proxy voting in written format as requested.

Investment values and returns

The following schedules were developed from information provided by the Plan’s financial advisor, Marquette Associates, Inc. and represents information included in the quarterly reporting package provided to the Committee.

Fair values of investments by market segment, money manager and asset class with related changes between 2016 and 2015 (in thousands) were:

Money managers and investments 2016 2015 Change

Domestic equity Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Core 29,294 26,158 3,136 Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Value 6,353 5,422 931 Rhumbline Russell Mid Capital Growth 5,806 5,402 404 SSgA Russell 2000 Small Capital Core 6,379 6,626 (247) Channing Capital 12,707 13,684 (977) Total domestic equity 60,539 57,292 3,247 International equity – mutual funds Allianz NFJ International - 9,616 (9,616) SSgA MSCI ACWI ex US Index 9,756 - 9,756 SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Cap 6,963 - 6,963 SSgA Emerging Markets 7,700 - 7,700 Thomas White International 10,085 10,384 (299) Total international equity – mutual funds 34,504 20,000 14,504 Global fixed income Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust 37,054 20,856 16,198 GMO Emerging Country Debt Investment Fund PLC - 11,832 (11,832) Brandywine Global Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund 14,318 13,606 712 Total global fixed income 51,372 46,294 5,078 Total net investments $ 146,415 $ 123,586 $ 22,829

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 48: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

44

Asset values and related portfolio percentages by market segment, asset class, and money managers as of December 31, 2016 were:

Investments Fair value

(000) Percent of

Portfolio Domestic equity Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Core $ 29,294 20.00 Rhumbline Russell 1000 Large Capital Value 6,353 4.34 Rhumbline Russell Mid Capital Growth 5,806 3.96 SSgA Russell 2000 Small Capital Core 6,379 4.36 Channing Capital 12,707 8.68 Total domestic equity 60,539 41.34 International equity – mutual funds SSgA MSCI ACWI ex US Index 9,756 6.66 SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Cap 6,963 4.76 SSgA Emerging Markets 7,700 5.26 Thomas White International 10,085 6.89 Total international equity – mutual funds 34,504 23.57 Global fixed income Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust 37,054 25.31 Brandywine Global Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund 14,318 9.78 Total global fixed income 51,372 35.09

Total net investments $ 146,415 100.00

The five largest equity holdings for all money managers included:

Company Fair value

(000) % of

Portfolio

Comerica Inc $ 495 0.3 Microsemi Corporation 465 0.3 Booz Allen Hamilton HDG. 460 0.3 Belden Inc 411 0.3 First Horizon National Corp 410 0.3

A complete listing of investment can be obtained by contacting METRO’s Office of the Controller. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 49: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

45

The following schedule reflects the investment returns for the total Plan by money managers along with comparisons to their primary benchmark that were active as of December 31, 2016. Investment returns were calculated by the Plan’s financial advisor using the time weighted method.

Periods Ended 12/31/2016

Last Quarter 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 5 years

Total Returns for the Plan (net of fees) (0.1) 7.1 1.4 1.9 7.7 Current Asset Mixed Benchmark (policy index) 0.1 7.6 2.9 3.7 7.9 Over (under) mixed benchmark (policy index) (0.2) (0.5) (1.5) (1.8) (0.2) Returns by Money Manager (net of fees)

Rhumbline Russell 1000 3.8 12.0 - - -

Russell 1000 benchmark 3.8 12.1 - - - Over (under) benchmark - (0.1) - - - Rhumbline Russell 1000 Value (funded Dec 2015) 6.6 17.2 - - - Russell 1000 Value benchmark 6.7 17.3 - - - Over (under) benchmark (0.1) (0.1) - - - Rhumbline Russell Mid Capital Growth (funded Dec, 2015) 0.3 7.2 - - - Russell Mid Capital Growth benchmark 0.5 7.3 - - - Over (under) benchmark (0.2) (0.1) - - - Channing Capital 9.5 16.5 - - - Russell 2500 Value benchmark 9.3 25.2 - - - Over (under) benchmark 0.2 (8.7) - - -

SSgA Russell 2000 Small Capital Core (funded Dec 2015) 8.8 21.4 - - -

Russell 2000 benchmark 8.8 21.3 - - - Over (under) benchmark - 0.1 - - - SSgA MSCI EAFE Small Cap (2.9) 7.2 - - - MSCI EAFE Small Cap benchmark (2.9) 2.2 - - - Over (under) benchmark - 5.0 - - - SSgA MSCI ACWI ex US Index (1.7) - - - - MSCI ACWI ex USA benchmark (1.3) - - - - Over (under) benchmark (0.4) - - - - SSgA Emerging Markets (4.3) 18.7 - - - MSCI Emerging Markets benchmark (4.2) 11.2 - - - Over (under) benchmark (0.1) 7.5 - - - Thomas White International (3.2) (2.9) (3.1) - - MSCI ACWI ex (Net)benchmark (1.3) 4.5 (0.7) - - Over (under) benchmark (1.9) (7.4) (2.4) - - Rhumbline Core Bond Pooled Trust (funded Dec 2015) (3.1) 2.4 - - - Barclays Aggregate benchmark (3.0) 2.6 - - - Over (under) benchmark (0.1) (0.2) - - -

Page 50: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

46

Brandywine – Global Opportunistic Fixed Income Fund (6.3) 5.1 (1.9) 0.8 2.4 Citigroup WGBI Unhedged Index benchmark (8.5) 1.6 (1.0) (0.8) (1.0) Over (under) benchmark 2.2 3.5 (0.9) 1.6 3.4

Net returns by asset class:

Net Returns by Market Segment Last Quarter 1 Year 2 Years 3 Years 5 Years Total equity 2.2 10.3 3.3 2.7 10.1 Large capital equity 4.2 12.8 7.4 7.3 * Small capital equity 9.2 18.0 3.6 1.1 * International equity (3.0) 4.6 (2.0) (3.7) 3.9 Global fixed income (4.0) 2.2 (2.1) 0.5 2.9

* Calculations were not available due to change in financial advisor.

The investment returns were calculated using the time-weighted (geometric) method. This method calculates the average rate per period on an investment that is compounded over multiple periods. A complete listing of all investments owned by the Plan can be obtained by contacting METRO’s Office of the Controller.

Trading Fees and Commissions for 2016

Broker Name

Amount of Trading Fees

and Commission

Number of Shares

Commission Per Share

Cabrera Capital Markets $ 864

34,041 $ 0.0254 Cheevers & Co. Inc. 275 9,166 0.0300 Drexel Hamilton LLC 11 382 0.0300 Instinet 52

3,456 0.0150

Investment Technology Group Inc. 98 51,310 0.0019 Jefferies + Company Inc. 41 2,719 0.0150 Johnson Rice & Company LLC 1,750 55,563 0.0315 Keefe Bruyette Woods Inc 2,612 82,880 0.0315 Kaybanc Capital Markets Inc 1,054 26,362 0.0400 King, CL & Associates, Inc 340 11,329 0.0300 Liquidnet Inc. 40 4,013 0.0100 Loop Capital Markets 2,024 93,644 0.0216 M Ramsey King Securities Inc. 198 6,592 0.0300 Merrill Lynch Pierce Fenner + Smith Inc. 163 5,421 0.0300 RBC Capital Markets 878 29,264 0.0300 Robert W. Baird Co. Incorporate 246 6,916 0.0356 Sandler Oneill and Partners L.P 134 3,343 0.0400 Seaport Group Securities, LLC 303 7,577 0.0400

Page 51: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

47

Broker Name

Amount of Trading Fees

and Commission

Number of Shares

Commission Per Share

Stephens, Inc $ 89 2,788 $ 0.0320 Stifel Nicolaus + Co Inc. 147 3,949 0.0373 Telsey Advisory Group LLC 399 12,470 0.0320 Topeka Capital Markets, Inc 63 2,108 0.0300 William Blair & Company LLC 27 673 0.0400 Williams Capital Group LLC 934 31,126 0.0300 Wunderlich Securities, Inc 54 1,787 0.0300 $ 12,796 488,879 $ 0.0262

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 52: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

48

Page 53: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

49

Actuarial Section (Unaudited)

Actuarial assumptions and funding requirements are reviewed for reasonableness by the Committee and METRO each year during discussions with the independent actuary. The first part of this section includes selected information for three years taken from previous actuarial valuation reports. The second part of this section includes the January 1, 2016 actuarial valuation report and the GASB 67 and 68 Disclosure Report for the Fiscal Year October 1, 2016 to September 30, 2017. Both of these reports were prepared by Milliman, Inc. the Plan’s independent actuary. State law requires the actuary’s report along with the independently audited annual financial report be filed each year with the Pension Review Board. In addition, the actuarial assumptions must be independently audited by a different actuary every five years and their report reviewed by the Committee, METRO, and the Plan’s independent actuary. This report must also be sent to Pension Review Board. Governmental Accounting Standard Board Statement No. 67 Financial Reporting for Pension Plans requires the preparation of a depletion analysis to determine if the projected cash inflows from contributions and investment returns will be adequate to meet benefit payments and expenses. The investment rate of return used in actuarial calculations must be reduced when projected cash flows are determined to be inadequate. Based on this analysis, no reduction to the 6.75% projected investment rate of return was required. An overview of the Plan is discussed in Note 1 to the Basic Financial Statements.

Page 54: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

50

Multi-year Information from Prior Years Actuarial Reports

The estimated investment returns on the fair value of assets assumes all cash flows of contributions, benefit payments, and all administrative expenses are paid at mid-year. The estimated investment returns on the fair value of assets for the last three years were:

January 1, 2016 January 1, 2015 January 1, 2014 Beginning fair value of assets $ 146,207,172 $ 142,053,930 $ 121,440,927 Net non-investment cash flows 2,235,564 (639,505) (499,128) Investment income (5,890,916) 4,792,747 21,112,131

Ending fair value of assets $ 142,551,820 $ 146,207,172 $ 142,053,930 Estimated market investment return (4.00)% 3.38% 17.42%

The estimated investment return on the actuarial value of assets is determined for the schedule -MB of IRS Form 5500 using a simplified formula as specified in the form instructions. It assumes all cash flows of the contributions, benefit payments, and administrative expenses are paid at mid-year. The estimated investment returns on the actuarial value of assets for the last three years were:

January 1, 2016 January 1, 2015 January 1, 2014 Beginning actuarial value of assets $ 142,619,248 $ 129,398,834 $ 113,144,758 Net non-investment cash flows 2,235,564 (639,505) (499,128) Investment income 7,783,204 13,859,919 16,753,204

Ending actuarial value of assets $ 152,638,016 $ 142,619,248 $ 129,398,834 Estimated investment return 5.41% 10.74% 14.84%

The Unfunded Actuarial Accrued Liability represents the balance of the present value of benefits that is allocated to employees’ service before the current plan year and not yet funded. The balances and related components for the last three years were:

Actuarial accrued liability

January 1, 2016

January 1, 2015

January 1, 2014

Active participants $164,992,378 $144,310,347 $106,145,918 Terminated vested participants 8,032,329 5,942,069 5,068,453 Deferred disabled participants - - 17,272 Deferred beneficiaries - 257,005 417,087 Retired participants 67,200,818 59,450,157 46,650,534 Disabled participants - - 764,066 Beneficiaries 3,577,763 3,290,699 2,335,104 Total 243,803,288 213,250,277 161,398,434

Actuarial value of assets 152,638,016 142,619,248 129,398,834 Unfunded actuarial accrued liabilities $ 91,165,272 $ 70,631,029 $ 31,999,600

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 55: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

51

Normal cost is the amount allocated to the current year using the Plan’s actuarial cost method. This method changed from the projected unit credit to the entry age normal starting with the January 1, 2016 actuarial valuation report. Normal cost for the last three years consisted of:

Entry Age Normal Projected Unit Credit

Normal cost

January 1, 2016

January 1, 2015

January 1, 2014

Withdrawal $ 885,881 $ 754,725 $ 551,417 Early retirement - 858,268 2,649,061 Unreduced retirement 2,027,992 683,865 1,828,955 Death 27,848 30,256 68,531 Disability 276,275 325,670 282,334 Total 3,217,996 2,652,784 5,380,298 Loading for expense 298,975 374,480 303,539

Total normal cost $ 3,516,971 $ 3,027,264 $ 5,683,837

Schedule of Retirees and Beneficiaries Added to or Removed from Rolls

Added to Rolls

Removed from Rolls

Rolls-End of Year

% Increase in Monthly Allowance

Average Annual

Allowance Year Ended

December 31 Annual Benefits

Annual Benefits

Annual Benefits

Number

Number

Number

2016 19 $ 328,498 6 $ 109,136 277 $ 6,741,314 3.36% $ 24,337 2015 17 536,340 2 13,156 264 6,521,952 8.72% 24,704 2014 24 782,595 2 26,743 249 5,998,768 14.20% 24,091 2013 20 379,103 36 773,752 227 5,242,915 (7.00%) 23,097 2012

14 295,535

4 83,999

243 5,637,564

3.90%

23,200

2011

67 2,414,196

- -

233 5,426,028

80.16%

23,288 2010

18 661,352

4 33,596

166 3,011,832

26.33%

18,144

2009

26 574,355

1 22,727

152 2,384,076

30.10%

15,685 2008

4 85,427

27 278,458

127 1,832,448

(9.53%)

14,429

The increase in retirees for 2011 was due to an early retirement package. Annual benefits and Average Annual Allowance represent the amounts that would have been paid if the employee retired at the beginning of the year. Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 56: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

52

Solvency Test

Actuarial Accrued Liability (AAL) Portion of AAL Covered by Assets Valuation

Date January 1

Active Member

Contributions

Retirees and Beneficiaries

Active and Inactive

Members

Total

Actuarial Value

of Assets

Active Member

Contributions

Retirees and Beneficiaries

Active and Inactive

Members

Total 2016 $ - $ 70,778,581 $ 173,024,707 $ 243,803,288 $ 152,638,016 N/A 100% 47.3% 62.6% 2015 - 68,939,930 144,310,347 213,250,277 142,619,248 N/A 100% 51.1% 66.9% 2014 - 49,749,704 111,648,730 161,398,434 129,398,834 N/A 100% 71.3% 80.2% 2013 - 52,937,702 97,571,229 150,508,931 113,144,758 N/A 100% 61.7% 75.2% 2012 - 51,130,839 90,920,928 142,051,767 110,276,187 N/A 100% 65.1% 77.6% 2011 - 26,905,274 124,686,424 151,591,698 114,082,428 N/A 100% 69.9% 75.3% 2010 132,417 20,519,641 123,588,975 144,241,033 110,433,818 100% 100% 72.6% 76.6% 2009 122,438 16,000,990 123,257,029 139,380,457 87,154,595 100% 100% 57.6% 62.5%

Information for 2008 was not available due to change in actuaries.

Metropolitan Transit Authority of Harris County, Texas 2016 Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Page 57: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

53

Page 58: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

54

Page 59: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

55

Page 60: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

56

Page 61: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

57

Page 62: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

58

Page 63: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

59

Page 64: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

60

Page 65: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

61

Page 66: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

62

Page 67: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

63

Page 68: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

64

Page 69: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

65

Page 70: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

66

Page 71: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

67

Page 72: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

68

Page 73: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

69

Page 74: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

70

Page 75: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

71

Page 76: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

72

Page 77: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

73

Page 78: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

74

Page 79: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

75

Page 80: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

76

Page 81: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

77

Page 82: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

78

Page 83: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

79

Page 84: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

80

Page 85: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

81

Page 86: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

82

Page 87: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

83

Page 88: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

84

Page 89: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

85

Page 90: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

86

Page 91: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

87

Page 92: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

88

Page 93: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

89

Page 94: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

90

Page 95: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

91

Page 96: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

92

Page 97: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

93

Page 98: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

94

Page 99: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

95

Page 100: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

96

Page 101: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

97

Page 102: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

98

Page 103: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

99

Page 104: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

100

Page 105: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

101

Page 106: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

102

Page 107: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

103

Page 108: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

104

Page 109: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

105

Page 110: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

106

Page 111: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

107

Page 112: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

108

Page 113: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

109

Page 114: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

110

Page 115: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

111

Page 116: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

112

Page 117: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

113

Page 118: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

114

Page 119: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

115

Page 120: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

116

Page 121: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

117

Page 122: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

118

Page 123: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

119

Page 124: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

120

Page 125: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

121

Page 126: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

122

Page 127: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

123

Statistical Section

(Unaudited)

The statistical section provides additional financial trend and participant information and was developed from information provided by the Plan’s administrator, actuarial, and audited financial reports.

Page 128: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

124

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Schedule of Benefit Payments to Participants For the Last Eight Years

Year Ended

Participants Receiving Benefits

Annuity and Other

Benefit Payments

Approximate Average Annual Benefit

Lump Sum

Participants Receiving Lump Sum

December 31, 2016 277 $ 6,741,314 $ 24,337

$3,633,268 18 December 31, 2015 264 6,330,656 23,980 2,447,094 20 December 31, 2014 249 5,625,138 22,591 3,079,381 19 December 31, 2013 227 5,130,003 22,599 3,573,751 20 December 31, 2012 243 5,540,612 22,801 3,795,494 35 December 31, 2011 233 3,835,947 16,463 12,830,580 82 December 31, 2010 166 2,772,726 16,703 8,679,199 65 December 31, 2009 152 2,325,188 15,297 6,929,972 58

The number of participant receiving benefits continues to increase as the work force is aging. Information was not developed for years prior to 2009.

Schedule of Annual Covered Payroll For Participants

For the Last 10 Years

Valuation Date

Active

Participants

Total Annual

Valuation Compensation (in millions)

Average Annual

Valuation Compensation

Percentage Change in

Compensation January 1, 2016 585 $ 47,098 $ 81,064 12.1

January 1, 2015 620 44,838 72,319 4.2 January 1, 2014 657 45,602 69,409 8.4 January 1, 2013 694 44,389 64,053 (0.9) January 1, 2012 730 47,185 64,637 1.0 January 1, 2011 902 57,702 63,972 4.1 January 1, 2010 927 56,962 61,448 (4.0) January 1, 2009 994 63,625 64,009 16.8 January 1, 2008 1,148 62,930 54,817 (3.4) January 1, 2007 1,134 64,349 56,746 3.7

Active participants and total compensation continues to decline as the plan is closed and employees are retiring.

Page 129: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

125

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust Schedule of Participants by Status

As of January 1 for the Last Ten Years

Participants 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007

Active 585 620 657 694 730 902 927 994 1,148 1,134 Participants moved to another status Terminated and vested 87 87 98 118 122 112 121 110 89 67 Retired 225 210 193 209 200 134 125 104 156 141 Disabled - - 12 13 13 13 13 12 - - Beneficiaries 43 44 24 28 20 19 14 11 - - Total participants 940 961 984 1,062 1,085 1,180 1,200 1,231 1,393 1,342

Prior to 2009, retired, disabled and beneficiaries are combined. The number of active participants continues to decline as the Plan is closed to new members.

Schedule of Benefit Payments by Type For the Last 10 Years as of December 31

(Amounts in thousands)

Types of Benefit Payment 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008* 2007*

Service $ 6,383 $ 5,979 $ 5,276 $ 4,768 $ 5,259 $ 3,558 $ 2,494 $ 2,092 $ - $ - Disabled - - - 109 114 124 124 128 - - Beneficiaries 359 352 349 253 168 154 152 105 - - Lump sums 3,633 2,447 3,079 3,574 3,795 12,830 8,679 6,930 - - $10,375 $ 8,778 $ 8,704 $ 8,704 $ 9,336 $16,666 $11,449 $ 9,255 $ - $ -

Total benefit payments were consist during the last three years as lump sum payments declined but were offset with monthly annuities. * Benefit payments by type prior to 2009 were not available due to change in actuary.

Page 130: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

126

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Schedule of Retired Participants by Type of Benefits

Monthly benefit payment

Number of Retirees *

Type of Retirement Type of Benefits Selected 1 2 3 4 5 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8

$1 - $500 38 8 11 - - 19 30 - - - - 1 6 1 501 - 1,000 38 11 14 - - 13 23 - 1 2 1 5 6 -

1,001 - 1,500 42 13 25 - - 4 20 1 - 3 1 8 9 - 1,501 - 2,000 50 15 31 - - 4 19 - 1 1 3 14 12 - 2,001 - 2,500 23 6 15 - - 2 9 - - - 1 6 7 - 2,501 - 3,000 19 5 13 - - 1 6 - - - 2 7 3 1 Over 3,000 67 23 44 - - - 23 2 - 3 10 18 11 -

277 81 153 - - 43 130 3 2 9 18 59 54 2

1. Normal retirement for age and service Option 1 – Life only 2. Early retirement Option 2 – 5 year certain life 3. Disability retirement Option 3 – 10 years certain life 4. Vested termination retirement Option 4 – 15 years certain life 5. Beneficiary Option 5 – 20 years certain life Option 6 – Joint and 50% survivor Option 7 – Joint and 100% survivor Option 8 – Other

* Includes certain beneficiaries and disabled participants that are receiving benefits.

Page 131: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

127

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position for 10 Years Ending December 31

2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 Additions Employer contributions $ 11,181,136 $ 11,248,671 $ 9,006,301 $ 8,847,436 $ 8,215,493 Investment income Interest and dividends 513,330 800,313 946,699 1,055,514 1,109,143 Net appreciation (loss) on investments 9,784,962 (6,025,771) 3,987,135 20,061,561 16,614,088 Investment income 10,298,292 (5,225,458) 4,933,834 21,117,075 17,723,231 Less investment services 327,188 665,458 716,728 497,730 387,639 Net Investment income 9,971,104 (5,890,916) 4,217,106 20,619,345 17,335,592 Total additions 21,152,240 5,357,755 13,223,407 29,466,781 25,551,085 Deductions Paid to Plan members and beneficiaries 10,374,582 8,777,750 8,704,519 8,703,754 9,336,106 Administrative services 226,067 235,357 224,559 172,857 153,585 Total deductions 10,600,649 9,013,107 8,929,078 8,876,611 9,489,691 Net increase/(decrease) in net position 10,551,591 (3,655,352) 4,294,329 20,590,170 16,061,394

Net position - restricted for pensions Beginning of the year 142,551,820 146,207,172 141,912,843 121,322,673 105,261,279 End of the year $ 153,103,411 $ 142,551,820 $ 146,207,172 $ 141,912,843 $ 121,322,673

Source: Annual audited financial reports. For trending analysis, please see Management’s Discussion and Analysis starting on page 11. Prior to 2011 investment expenses were included as part of Administrative expenses

(Continued on next page)

Page 132: Metropolitan Transit Authority Of Harris County, Texas Non ...Plan Participants, Non-Union Pension Plan Committee Members and the Board of Directors of the Metropolitan Transit Authority

128

Metropolitan Transit Authority Non-Union Pension Plan and Trust

Statements of Changes in Fiduciary Net Position for 10 Years Ending December 31

2011 2010 2009 2008 2007 Additions Employer contributions $ 10,689,264 $ 11,143,438 $ 12,655,761 $ 8,952,043 $ 13,509,671 Investment income Interest and dividends 1,053,344 878,381 952,817 1,898,291 2,317,987 Net (loss) appreciation on investments (1,608,656) 15,077,149 20,642,470 (36,568,798) 4,525,175 Investment income (555,312) 15,955,530 21,595,287 (34,670,507) 6,843,162 Less investment services 437,802 - - - - Net Investment Income (993,114) 15,955,530 21,595,287 (34,670,507) 6,843,162 Total additions 9,696,150 27,098,968 34,251,048 (25,718,464) 20,352,833 Deductions Paid to Plan members and beneficiaries 16,666,527 11,446,421 9,255,160 7,119,818 10,815,395 Administrative services 165,343 498,631 381,633 468,129 465,822 Total deductions 16,831,870 11,945,052 9,636,793 7,587,947 11,281,217 Net (decrease)/increase in net position (7,135,720) 15,153,916 24,614,255 (33,306,411) 9,071,616

Net position - restricted for pensions Beginning of the year 112,396,999 97,243,083 72,628,828 105,935,239 96,863,623 End of the year $ 105,261,279 $112,396,999 $ 97,243,083 $ 72,628,828 $ 105,935,239

Source: Annual audited financial reports. For trending analysis, please see Management’s Discussion and Analysis starting on page 11. Prior to 2011 investment expenses were included as part of Administrative expenses