MIAMI UNIVERSITY ART BUILDING CORRIDOR RENOVATION 2019 › fco › admin › upload › Art... · ART BUILDING CORRIDOR RENOVATION 2019 400 SOUTH PATTERSON AVE. MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD,

MIAMI UNIVERSITY ART BUILDING CORRIDOR RENOVATION 2019

400 SOUTH PATTERSON AVE. MIAMI UNIVERSITY OXFORD, OH 45056

COMMISSION NUMBER 1905

ADDENDUM #01

APRIL 22, 2019

This addendum is a modification of the Contract Documents for this project. It is to be considered in the Proposals and covers additions to or changes in the Contract Documents as follows:

This addendum consists of the following: Addendum document consisting of three (3) pages in 8.5”X11” format Pre-Bid Meeting Minutes attachment, five (5) pages in 8.5”X11” format Pre-Bid Meeting Sign-in attachment, one (1) page in 8.5”X11” format Asbestos testing reports, twelve (12) page in 8.5”X11” format

GENERAL NOTES

ITEM #1 PRE-BID MEETING MINUTES: Proposed bids must include information provided in the Pre-Bid meeting and documented in the Pre-Bid meeting minutes. This is to include the construction layout provided by Miami University during the meeting. Attached: five (5) pages

ITEM #2 PRE-BID SIGN-IN SHEETS: Attached: one (1) pages

ITEM #3 ASBESTOS TESTING REPORTS: Attached: twelve (12) pages

NOTICE TO BIDDERS ITEM #4 SEALED BIDS, BASED UPON THE FOLOWING ESTIMATES WILL BE RECEIVED FOR:

1. Revise GENERAL Contract amount to read “$411,727.00” 2. Revise ALT. G-2 amount to read “$801.00” 3. Revise ALT. G-3 amount to read “$32,538.00” 4. Revise ALT. G-4 amount to read “$24,332.00” 5. Revise ALT. G-5 amount to read “$25,136.00”

SPECIFICATIONS ITEM #5 SECTION 00 10 00 – SOLICITATION (GENERAL CONTRACTING PROJECT)

1. Revise Trade, General Estimate of $478,387 to read “$411,727”

ITEM #6 SECTION 01 10 00 – SUMMARY 1. Under PART 1- GENERAL, Item E, Revise #5. as follows to eliminate reference to VCT removal:

“5. Second floor corridor work consists of exposed concrete floor preparation...”

ITEM #7 SECTION 01 73 20 – SELECTIVE DEMOLITION 1. Under Item 1.5 PROCESSES COORDINATION, ADD the following:

“G. Prior to work conducted by the Contractor, Miami University to remove the rubber base and vinyl composition tile (VCT) in 2nd Floor Corridors 299D & 201 and 1st Floor Corridor 199G.”

ART BUILDING CORRIDOR RENOVATION 2019 ADDENDUM NO. 01 Miami University 04/22/2019 ADDENDUM PAGE 2 of 3 ITEM #8 SECTION 10 11 24 – TACKABLE WALL PANELS

1. Under Item 1.4 SUBMITTALS, Eliminate Items A, B, & D and replace with the following: “A. Tackable material to be provided by Miami University and received and installed by Contractor.”

2. Under Item 1.5 QUALITY ASSURANCE, Revise Item A to read “Miami University to provide…” Revise Item B to read “Miami University to identify…”

3. Under Item 1.6 DELIVERY, STORAGE & HANDLING, Eliminate Items A & B and replace with the following: “A. Tackable material to be provided by Miami University and received and installed by Contractor.”

4. Under Item 1.8 WARRANTY, Eliminate specification warranty reference. 5. Under Item 2.01 MANUFACTURERS, Revise Item A to read:

“Tackable Wall Systems as provided by Owner.”

ARCHITECTURAL DRAWINGS ITEM #9 GENERAL NOTES All references to new tackable surface material:

1. All new tackable surface materials to be provided by Miami University with Contractor to receive and install. As noted, Contractors to remain responsible for providing and installing aluminum “J” trims.

2. General Contractor to coordinate with Asbestos Abatement Contractor in regards to their containment areas.

ITEM #10 SHEET A1.1– BASEMENT FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN Callout Tags:

1. Change callout tag around restrooms on drawing A to read as “D/A1.1” Demolition Notes:

1. Add Note #19 to water fountain in Corridor 099D outside of restrooms. Note to read “Drinking fountain to be removed.”

ITEM #11 SHEET A1.2– FIRST FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN Demolition Notes:

1. Remove Note #3 from Corridor 199G only. Rubber wall base in that area to be removed by Miami University contracted Asbestos Abatement Contractor.

2. Eliminate Note #5. Existing VCT and asbestos containing mastic on first floor corridor to be removed by a Miami University contracted Asbestos Abatement Contractor.

3. Change Note #9 to read as “Existing trash receptacle removed by others.” 4. Change Note #22 to read as “Remove existing tackboard case and patch and repair wall

where removed.”

ITEM #12 SHEET A1.3– SECOND FLOOR DEMOLITION PLAN Demolition Notes:

1. Remove Note #2 from Corridors 299D & 201 and Alcoves 254, 244, 236, & 228 only. Rubber wall base in those areas to be removed by Miami University contracted Asbestos Abatement Contractor.

2. Eliminate Note #3. Existing VCT and asbestos containing mastic on second floor to be removed by a Miami University contracted asbestos abatement contractor.

3. Add Note #21 to water fountain in Corridor 299D, across from East Stair 299B. Note to read “Drinking fountain to be removed.”

ITEM #13 SHEET A2.1– BASEMENT FLOOR NEW WORK PLAN New Work Notes:

1. Add Note #23 to water fountain in Corridor 099D outside of restrooms. Note to read “Provide

ART BUILDING CORRIDOR RENOVATION 2019 ADDENDUM NO. 01 Miami University 04/22/2019 ADDENDUM PAGE 3 of 3

and install new bottle fill station drinking fountain. See engineering drawings”

ITEM #14 SHEET A2.3– SECOND FLOOR NEW WORK PLAN New Work Notes:

1. Add Note #25 to water fountain in Corridor 299D, across from East Stair 299B. Note to read “Provide and install new bottle fill station drinking fountain. See engineering drawings”

ITEM #15 SHEET A4.1– FLOOR FINISH PLANS AND MATERIALS Wall/Ceiling & Paint Finishes:

1. T-1 Tackable surface to read: “T-1 TACKABLE SURFACE MFGR: Zintra Acoustic Solution STYLE: ½” thick 24”x24” Hexagonal Pattern Coordinate w/ Miami University Project Manager for wall patterns. COLOR: Multiple Colors to be Determined by Owner”

ENGINEERING DRAWINGS ITEM #16 SHEET F1.1– FIRST FLOOR FIRE SUPRESSION PLAN Plan Notes:

1. Change Note #2 to read as “Replace all existing sprinkler heads with new concealed sprinkler heads. Turn over existing sprinkler heads to Owner. Reference The Architectural Group Finish Plan drawings for head colors”

ITEM #17 SHEET P1.0– BASEMENT PLUMBING PLAN Plan Notes:

1. Add Note #2 to water fountain in Corridor 099D outside of restrooms. Note to read “Existing drinking fountain to be removed and replaced with new drinking fountain/bottle filler. Capture existing sanitary and domestic water lines and connect.”

ITEM #18 SHEET P1.2– 2nd FLOOR PLUMBING PLAN Plan Notes:

1. Add Note #2 to water fountain in Corridor 299D, across from East Stair 299B. Note to read “Existing drinking fountain to be removed and replaced with new drinking fountain/bottle filler. Capture existing sanitary and domestic water lines and connect.”

END OF ADDENDUM #01

MIAMI UNIVERSITY ART BUILDING CORRIDOR RENOVATION 2019

PRE-BID MEETING AGENDA

11:00 AM, Wednesday, April 17, 2019

1. An attendance sheet was distributed

2. Pre-Bid Meeting Minutes: To be taken by A/E and distributed later as part of Addendum #01.

3. Introductions were made and are as follows:

Miami University: Tricia Price: Project Manager (Main Contact) Physical Facilities Department, Planning, Architecture & Engineering Cole Service Building, 101 South Fisher Drive Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 Email: [email protected] Phone: 513-529-3484 Cell Phone: 937-218-3638

Elizabeth Davidson, Director of Strategic Procurement & Contract Physical Facilities Department, Planning, Architecture & Engineering Cole Service Building, 101 South Fisher Drive Miami University, Oxford, OH 45056 Email: [email protected] Phone: (513) 529-2453

Architecture/ Norman D. Butt, AIA, LEED AP BD+C, Principal-in-Charge Engineering The Architectural Group, Inc.

135 N. Main Street, Dayton, Ohio 45402 Email: [email protected] Phone: 937-223-2500

Jacob C. Griffin, Associate AIA, Project Manager The Architectural Group, Inc. 135 N. Main Street, Dayton, Ohio 45402 Email: [email protected] Phone: 937-223-2500

e2m consulting engineering – Project Design Engineers

4. Roles and personnel of the University, Associates, & Contractors were defined. 5. It was stated that the University PM is the University point source for directions and

instructions. 6. It was stated to insure Special Inspection and Testing Services are addressed. Refer to Ohio

Building Code, Section 1704.1.1-2. This is required for all projects that require Construction Building Permits from the State.

7. It was stated that Prevailing Wage requirements are required. 8. Progress Schedule: The following items and schedule were noted.

Creating architecture since 1990

Critical path schedule is to be developed by the General Contractor, with the input from all of the other sub-contractors. No pay application will be considered until the schedule is approved by all parties.

The schedule line items should coordinate and correspond with the schedule of values (SOV). Pre-Bid: Wednesday, April 17 at 11:00 AM @ Cole Service Building Contract Documents are available for purchase from Miami University, Office of Facilities

Contracting, 181 Cole Service Building, Oxford, Ohio 45056, for $50 per set, payable to MIAMI UNIVERSITY

Final day for questions: Friday, April 19 at 2:00 PM Final bid due date/time and opening: Thursday, April 25, 2019 at 2:00 PM

• Sealed bids, based upon the following estimates will be received for General Contractors, published bid estimate $416,387

Progress completion/turn over and training if needed all completed by August 2, 2019.

9. Miami University “Front-End Specification Overview” a. The bidding conditions are described in State of Ohio Statue153 and should be followed for this

project. Bids are due in a sealed envelope.

b. Bid forms and other materials are available on Miami’s FCO website (www.pfd.miamioh.edu/fco)

c. Documents can be purchased from Miami University for a non-refundable cost of $50.00 plus shipping.

d. Betsy reminded everyone to review front-end Specification bidding information.

e. The yellow pages in the document represent Prevailing Wage information.

f. Completed Bid Form

i. Two (2) forms are needed to be filled out: Bidder Affirmation and Discloser forms.

ii. The Commitment to Participate in Edge form has three options: A, B & C. Betsy explained these options. In order to be a responsive bidder one of the three options must be check with the document and submit along with the bid.

iii. The back of the Bid Form should have a signature of the person who is authorized to commit the company to a contract. The Bid Form must be signed with “wet signature(s).”

iv. Betsy described bid security options that must be followed.

v. Contractor must submit Bid Security form. MU prefers the hybrid Bid Guarantee & Bond type or if bonding isn’t achieved a security amount of 10% is required of the bid amount in the form of a cashier’s check, certified check or letter of credit.

g. Apparent bidder award requirements:

i. A current EEO Certificate must be submitted.

ii. Insurance requirements must be met as evidenced in an accord form submittal.

iii. A current Workers Compensation Certificate must be received.

iv. A Bidders Qualification Form must be submitted. Norman recommended submitting this with the bid in an effort to expedite the post bid review process. TAG will check and review the details of apparent successful bidder and review qualifications.

v. A certificate from the Bureau of Workman’s Compensation is required indicating compliance with their Drug-Free Safety Program (DFSP).

h. During the project payment applications must be supported by certified payroll reports or the pay request will not be processed.

i. The project is tax exempt. MU will provide tax exempt certificate. 10. Project Description: Architecture, Engineering

Jacob and Norman presented a brief walk-through of the scope of the construction drawings. 11. Items to not miss in documents: The following items were pointed out specifically and reviewed.

A designated parking area will be established by the General Contractor for parking, lay down area, and receiving materials. Review 00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions (General Contracting) 6.10.9 for fencing requirements.

Review 00 73 00 Supplementary Conditions (General Contracting) for parking procedures.


08 71 00 Door Hardware – Mortis Locks/Latch Sets/Strikes and Kick Plates 08 87 23 Safety and Security Films – second floor glass Atrium 225 area 09 21 16 Gypsum Board Assemblies – Finish Level Schedule 09 51 00 Acoustical Ceilings – Four types of acoustical panels in varying areas 09 67 00 Fluid Applied Flooring – Basis of Design – Action Flooring – Herculan IG 09 68 13 Floor Covering Accessories – transition strips for every entry/door and tread 09 90 00 Painting and Coating – Basis of Design – PPG Porter

• Review 2.04 Painting Standards 10 11 24 Tackable Wall Panels – Basis of Design – Zintra Acoustic Solution -Hexagonal Panels

as distributed by MDC. Note the finish schedule calls out EzoBard, will be noted in the Addendum.

E1.1 and E1.2 Plan Note #1 – All fixtures to be removed, existing 2X2 fixtures have LED retro fit kit installed. Electrical contractor shall remove LED retrofit kit and return complete kit to Owner. Electrical contractor shall dispose existing housing, remove existing LED flat panel fixtures in select location and return to Owner.

E1.1 Note #2 – Track lighting to be removed and returned to Owner. F1.1 Plan Note to be added by Addendum #1 – replace all existing sprinkler heads with new

concealed sprinkler heads. Turn over existing sprinkler heads to Owner.

12. Project Management Reminders: The following reminders were reviewed. a. The project is single prime with "General Contractor" contracting Mechanical, Electrical, and

General Subcontractors as required. b. Overtime/Premium time is to be included in the bid as needed. c. Parking Procedures

1. See the attached construction fencing/laydown/parking plan. 2. If the contractors run out of room and need to park elsewhere, they will need to purchase

a parking pass from parking services for a time period of no more than 30 days. 3. Red Parking passes are $35 per month and are the responsibility of the contractor. 4. See PM for approval of parking pass.

d. State Inspections: General Contractor to obtain and schedules required inspections. e. Project Clean-Up

1. Contract Documents 2. Daily cleanup is required. 3. Salvage Materials: Nothing may be burned or sold on site.

f. Deliveries: Must be received at project site. MU will not accept deliveries for job sites.

13. Bid Questions: The following were noted. a. Bid questions must be in writing (email only). b. All questions regarding the front end documents must go through Miami University Facilities

Contracting Office (FCO). c. All technical questions must go to The Architectural Group, Inc. (Both Norman Butt and Jacob

Griffin) with a copy to Tricia Price at Miami University. d. Individual tours may be scheduled as requested through MU Project Manager.

14. Addendum One will be published by Monday - April 22, 2019 by 2:00 pm. Document 00 10 00 – Solicitation General Contracting

• Revise “Trade, General Contract ……. Estimate $478,387 to read bid estimate at “$416,387”

• Pre-Bid meeting minutes will be published along with attendee sign-in sheet • The Art Building was built in 1985; Miami only has asbestos reports for those

buildings built in 1981 or earlier. Test samples have been taken of the stair mastic and tiles on the Second Floor. Test results will be published in the Addendum.

• All correspondence/questions should be emailed to Norman Butt, TAG at [email protected] and Jacob Griffin, TAG at [email protected] no later than Friday – April 19, 2019 by 2:00 pm.

15. Project Schedule: The following project schedule was noted.


Site Construction Start: Monday, May 20, 2019 Substantial Completion: Friday, August 2, 2019

16. Project Site Visitation Walkthrough: The following were noted during the walkthrough:

a. The corridors and stairwells were reviewed by attendees. b. The scope of painting was discussed that some high and difficult to reach areas would need to

be addressed in the bids. c. It was pointed out that considerations were made on the drawings to how the drywall on the

exterior wall faced with quarry tile would be detailed. d. The painting of the backside of the drywall black to be installed covering the windows was

pointed out. e. It was noted by Tricia that the water fountains on the basement and second floors should be

replaced similarly to that on the first floor. f. Bathrooms were reviewed by attendees. g. It was noted that some of the existing wall base that is to be removed in the basement goes

under some of the existing wall material.

GateDumpster

Constructionlay down

and parking

pricetl2

Line

pricetl2

Line

pricetl2

Line

17-Apr-2019

Miami University

Joe Fetrow

Dear Joe,

Re: Art Building Work Order: 1904795

Fax: 513-529-2830Tel: 513-529-2829

6 Hughes Hall, Room 55

Oxford, OH 45056

ALS Environmental received 4 samples on 10-Apr-2019 03:53 PM for the analyses presented in the following report.

Project Manager

Rob Nieman

Rob NiemanElectronically approved by: Rob Nieman

The analytical data provided relates directly to the samples received by ALS Environmental and for only the analyses requested.

QC sample results for this data met laboratory specifications. Any exceptions are noted in the Case Narrative, or noted with qualifiers in the report or QC batch information. Should this laboratory report need to be reproduced, it should be reproduced in full unless written approval has been obtained from ALS Laboratory Group. Samples will be disposed in 30 days unless storage arrangements are made.

The total number of pages in this report is 12.

If you have any questions regarding this report, please feel free to contact me.

Sincerely,

ADDRESS 4388 Glendale Milford Rd Cincinnati, OH 45242- | PHONE (513) 733-5336 | FAX (513) 733-5347

ALS GROUP USA, CORP. Part of the ALS Group An ALS Limited Company

Date: 17-Apr-19ALS Environmental

Project: Art Building

Client: Miami University

Work Order: 1904795Work Order Sample Summary

Lab Samp ID Client Sample ID Collection DateTag Number Date ReceivedMatrix Hold

1904795-01 Art-001 Bulk 4/9/2019 4/10/2019 15:531904795-02 Art-002 Bulk 4/9/2019 4/10/2019 15:531904795-03 Art-003 Bulk 4/9/2019 4/10/2019 15:531904795-04 Art-004 Bulk 4/9/2019 4/10/2019 15:53

SS Page 1 of 1

Date: 17-Apr-19ALS Environmental



Work Order: 1904795Case Narrative

It is the responsibility of the client to notify the lab of any certification requirements in writing via the chain of custody as this may determine the preparation and analytical procedures employed.Laboratory accreditation does not in any way constitute approval or endorsement by any accrediting body or agency of the federal government. Please contact ALS Cincinnati QA/QC Manager for accreditation identifications and certifications.All sample collection is performed outside of ALS and is the sole responsibility of the client. Sample condition acceptable upon receipt except where noted. Estimates of concentration are semi-quantitative and are made on an area basis. Results apply only to portions of samples analyzed. Samples disposed after 60 days. Cover letter signatory indicates report generation only. Raw data validated by peer analyst. Analyst responsible for technical content of report.The reporting limit (RL) for asbestos in bulk materials is 1% and is a function of the quantity of sample analyzed, the nature of any matrix interferences, sample preparation, and fiber size and distribution. Results reported as ND indicate that no asbestos was detected. Results reported as "Trace" indicate that asbestos was detected at some level confidently determined to be <1% which is considered inconclusive according to New York ELAP. Results reported as "Near 1%" indicate that while asbestos was detected at a level confidently determined to be <1% as prepared, the inherent uncertainty of the quantification technique(s) employed and the concentration nearing the 1% mark necessitate the recommendation that verification of these results by a more accurate and precise method be made. ALS performs variety of PLM methods for asbestos in bulk building materials including EPA 600/R-93/116, NIOSH 9002, ELAP 198.1, and ELAP 198.6. In addition, we perform a modified uncertified version of EPA 600/R-04/004 for asbestos in vermiculite which reports asbestos as present or absent only, an in-house developed uncertified method ALS SOP ENV 004 for asbestos in soil, and asbestos in soil by ASTM D7521. Regardless of the method requested, all samples are examined according to mandatory method protocol. Any optional method protocol are eliminated from the initial analysis but may be performed upon client request. These may include; insufficient sample volume rejection*, phase separation of layered or heterogeneous samples, ashing to remove organic interferences, acid dissolution to remove mineral carbonate interferences, point counting**, and analysis by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) to verify ND results.All samples are examined by stereomicroscope for the determination of homogeneity, texture, friability, color, and extent of fibrous components. Non-asbestos materials such as foil, paper, metal, plastic, pebbles, or organic debris are ignored and a subsample of the remaining material homogenized by some means for examination by polarized light microscope (PLM). Information obtained via both stereomicroscope and PLM are used in the final qualitative and quantitative analysis of fibrous components. NOTE: Any visible building debris in soil samples such as pieces of drywall, roofing material,

CN Page 1 of 2



Work Order: 1904795Case Narrative

insulation, concrete, etc., are not included in the soil analysis. If present, these are considered possible asbestos containing materials (ACM) and may be analyzed as separate samples upon client request.*Sufficient sample volume is material dependent. For samples such as floor tiles, roofing felts, sheet insulation, etc., three to four square inches of the layered material is preferred. For materials such as ceiling tiles, loose fill insulation, pipe insulation, etc., one cubic inch (~15cc) is preferred. For samples of thin coating materials such as paints, mastics, spray plasters, etc., a smaller sample size may be suitable. For vermiculite analysis, a one gallon ziploc bag full of dry, loose material is acceptable. For ENV 004 soil samples, a 4oz jar is recommended. The ASTM D7521 Soil method requires a minimum of 8oz and a maximum of 16oz of homogeneous soil.**PLM samples at or near the 1% detection limit may be analyzed by the 400 point count analysis which refers to method EPA 600/M4/82/020, or AHERA method EPA 40 CFR Part 763, Sub. E, App. E as these are synonymous.

CN Page 2 of 2

Project: Art BuildingClient: Miami University Work Order: 1904795

ALS Environmental Date: 17-Apr-19

Client Sample ID: Art-001

Lab ID: 1904795-01A Collection Date: 4/9/2019

Matrix: BULK

Analyses Result Units Analytical Results

E600/R-93/116 Analyst: MRSPrep Date: 4/15/2019Macroscopic Examination

4/15/2019Date AnalyzedAsbestos by PLM

Color Brown

Description Tile

Homogeneity Layered

Texture Compact

E600/R-93/116Other Materials

Cellulose %Trace

Fiberglass %ND

Non-fibrous %>70<=80

Other fibers %ND

Resin/binder %>10<=20

E600/R-93/116Asbestiform Minerals

Amosite 0.10%ND

Anthophyllite 0.10%ND

Chrysotile 0.10%ND

Crocidolite 0.10%ND

Tremolite - actinolite 0.10%ND

Total asbestos 0.10%ND

AR Page 1 of 6

Note:




Lab ID: 1904795-01B Collection Date: 4/9/2019

Matrix: BULK




Color Black

Description Mastic

Homogeneity Layered

Texture Resinous


Cellulose %>1<=3

Fiberglass %ND


Other fibers %ND



Amosite 0.10%ND


Chrysotile 0.10%>1<=3

Crocidolite 0.10%ND


Total asbestos 0.10%>1<=3

AR Page 2 of 6

Note:





Matrix: BULK




Color Brown

Description Tile

Homogeneity Layered

Texture Compact


Cellulose %Trace

Fiberglass %ND


Other fibers %ND



Amosite 0.10%ND


Chrysotile 0.10%ND

Crocidolite 0.10%ND



AR Page 3 of 6

Note:




Lab ID: 1904795-02B Collection Date: 4/9/2019

Matrix: BULK




Color Brown

Description Mastic

Homogeneity Layered

Texture Resinous


Cellulose %>3<=5

Fiberglass %Trace


Other fibers %ND



Amosite 0.10%ND


Chrysotile 0.10%ND

Crocidolite 0.10%ND



AR Page 4 of 6

Note:





Matrix: BULK




Color Beige

Description Material

Homogeneity Homogeneous

Texture Resinous


Cellulose %>1<=3

Fiberglass %Trace


Other fibers %Trace



Amosite 0.10%ND


Chrysotile 0.10%ND

Crocidolite 0.10%ND



AR Page 5 of 6

Note:





Matrix: BULK




Color Beige

Description Material

Homogeneity Homogeneous

Texture Resinous


Cellulose %>1<=3

Fiberglass %Trace


Other fibers %Trace



Amosite 0.10%ND


Chrysotile 0.10%ND

Crocidolite 0.10%ND



AR Page 6 of 6

Note:


QUALIFIERS, ACRONYMS, UNITS



WorkOrder: 1904795

Units Reported Description

Qualifier Description

Acronym Description

%

Value exceeds Regulatory Limit*Not accreditedaAnalyte detected in the associated Method Blank above the Reporting LimitBValue above quantitation rangeEAnalyzed outside of Holding TimeHAnalyte detected below quantitation limitJNot offered for accreditationnNot Detected at the Reporting LimitNDSample amount is > 4 times amount spikedODual Column results percent difference > 40%PRPD above laboratory control limitRSpike Recovery outside laboratory control limitsSAnalyzed but not detected above the MDLU

Method DuplicateDUPEPA MethodELaboratory Control SampleLCSLaboratory Control Sample DuplicateLCSDMethod BlankMBLKMethod Detection LimitMDLMethod Quantitation LimitMQLMatrix SpikeMSMatrix Spike DuplicateMSDPost Digestion SpikePDSPractical Quantitaion LimitPQLSample Detection LimitSDLSW-846 MethodSW

QF Page 1 of 1

ALS Environmental

Sample Receipt Checklist

Client Name: MIAMI-OXFORD

Work Order: 1904795

Date/Time Received: 10-Apr-19 15:53

Received by: SNH

Checklist completed byeSignature Date

Reviewed by:DateeSignature

Matrices:

Carrier name: Client

Shipping container/cooler in good condition? Yes No Not Present

Custody seals intact on shipping container/cooler? Yes No Not Present

Custody seals intact on sample bottles? Yes No Not Present

Chain of custody present? Yes No

Chain of custody signed when relinquished and received? Yes No

Chain of custody agrees with sample labels? Yes No

Samples in proper container/bottle? Yes No

Sample containers intact? Yes No

Sufficient sample volume for indicated test? Yes No

All samples received within holding time? Yes No

Container/Temp Blank temperature in compliance? Yes No

Yes No No VOA vials submittedWater - VOA vials have zero headspace?

Water - pH acceptable upon receipt? Yes No N/A

Temperature(s)/Thermometer(s):

Login Notes:

Cooler(s)/Kit(s):

11-Apr-19 12-Apr-19 Stephanie Harrington Rob Nieman

pH adjusted? Yes No N/A

pH adjusted by:

CorrectiveAction:

Comments:

Client Contacted: Date Contacted: Person Contacted:

Contacted By: Regarding:

SRC Page 1 of 1