64
2008 “PRE-Season” In Review: A Comparison of Tropical Cyclones Fay, Hanna, and Ike with Regards to Predecessor Rainfall Event (PRE) Development Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop November 5-6, 2008

Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

  • Upload
    kamil

  • View
    37

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

2008 “PRE-Season” In Review: A Comparison of Tropical Cyclones Fay, Hanna, and Ike with Regards to Predecessor Rainfall Event (PRE) Development. Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop November 5-6, 2008. Fay. Fay Overview. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

2008 “PRE-Season” In Review: A Comparison of Tropical

Cyclones Fay, Hanna, and Ike with Regards to Predecessor

Rainfall Event (PRE) Development

Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr.NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY

Northeast Regional Operational WorkshopNovember 5-6, 2008

Page 2: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Fay

Page 3: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Fay Overview

Fay came ashore as a Tropical Storm over the FL Keys on Aug. 19, then slowly meandered across the FL Peninsula the next several days

Synoptic Back-drop: Cutoff low over the southern plains Large, building anticyclone over the eastern

U.S., to the north and northeast of Fay

Page 4: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 19 Aug.

LFay

Ridge Axis

Page 5: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

925 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 19 Aug.

LFay

Ridge Axis

Page 6: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

300 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 19 Aug.

Page 7: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

SR Null-Case Composites

700 mb heights (dam) and upward vertical motion (shaded, μb s-1)

925 mb heights (dam), θe (K), and 200 mb winds (shaded, m s-1)

Center of composite TC

Page 8: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

24-Hour QPE Through 1200 UTC, 20 Aug.

Fay’s Direct Rainfall

Page 9: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Mosaic, 2100 UTC, 20 Aug.

Page 10: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Parcel Trajectories

Red – About 925 mbBlue – About 700 mbGreen – About 500 mb

Page 11: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 21 Aug.

LFay

Ridge Axes

Page 12: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

24-Hour QPE Through 1200 UTC, 21 Aug.

Fay’s Direct Rainfall

Disorganized Convection

Page 13: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Mosaic, 1800 UTC, 21 Aug.

Page 14: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Parcel Trajectories

Red – About 925 mbBlue – About 700 mbGreen – About 500 mb

Page 15: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 22 Aug.

L

Fay

Ridge Axes

Page 16: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

24-Hour QPE Through 1200 UTC, 22 Aug.

Still Disorganized Convection

Fay’s Rainfall

Page 17: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Loop – 20 Aug. to 24 Aug.

Page 18: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

A Classic Null-Case

Fay produced tremendous rainfall across parts of the Southeastern U.S. Several day totals of 20”+ in parts of FL Due to the direct impacts of Fay’s rainfall shield

and her slow movementPRE development not observed

Expansive mid-level ridge was in place; nearly enveloped Fay

Precipitation maxima stayed tightly clustered around the circulation center

Page 19: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Hanna

Page 20: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Hanna Overview

Hanna came ashore as a Category 1 Hurricane near the NC/SC border around 0600 UTC, 6 Sept.

Synoptic Back-drop: Large western Atlantic ridge and central U.S.

troughiness Deep southerly flow regime over the eastern states

Page 21: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

700 mb Heights/Winds, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

Page 22: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

925 mb Heights/Theta-E and 200 mb Winds, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

Theta-E Ridge Line

Page 23: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Hanna Falls Within the SR Category; SR TC Tracks and PRE Locations

All SR TC Tracks All SR PPTC Tracks; with PRE centroids (colored dots)

Page 24: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

SR PPTC Composites (PRE - 12)SR PPTC Composites (PRE - 12)

Center of composite TC

Trough axis

Ridge axis

θe-Ridge axis

700 mb heights (dam) and upward vertical

motion (shaded, μb s-1)

925 mb heights (dam), θe (K), and 200 mb winds

(shaded, m s-1)

Page 25: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Mid-level Streamlines

Representative TC Tracks

TC Rainfall

PREs

LL θe-Ridge Axis

See inset

UL Jet

Conceptual Model: LOT PRE Ahead Of SR Or AR TCConceptual Model: LOT PRE Ahead Of SR Or AR TC

Revised and updated from Fig. 13 of Bosart and Carr (1978)

Page 26: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

PRE Outlook

Synoptic setting seemed somewhat favorable for potential PRE development poleward of Hanna TC embedded within southerly 700 mb flow, with short

wave upstream However, trough was less amplified than the composites

Strengthening upper-level jet streak to the north Developing 925 mb theta-e ridge, although a little

broader and farther east than the composites Proximity of low-level boundary

Page 27: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

850 mb Moisture Transport, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

Page 28: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

850 mb Moisture Transport, 1200 UTC, 6 Sept.

Page 29: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Precipitable Water and Low-Level Winds, 0000 UTC, 6 Sept.

Page 30: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Precipitable Water and Low-Level Winds, 1200 UTC, 6 Sept.

Page 31: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Loop, 0000 – 1500 UTC, 6 Sept.

Page 32: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

QPE, 0600-1200 UTC, 6 Sept.

“PRE-like” Rainfall

Page 33: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

A Quick PRE

A band of heavy rainfall did develop north of Hanna from late Friday, 9/6 into Sat., 9/7 However, it was transient in nature; almost like

a progressive warm front feature Limited rainfall in most areas to 1” or less Parts of RI/southeast MA did get heavier amounts (2-

3” and locally higher, in just a 3-6 hour period)• Best combination of moisture inflow and jet dynamics

Page 34: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Hanna’s Direct Rainfall Shield

A narrow band of heavy rain accompanied Hanna up the Eastern Seaboard Maximum rainfall shifted increasingly just to the

left of track with poleward extent Typical of transitioning TC

Generally, 3-6” of rain fell within a 6-10 hour period

Dry antecedent conditions and the lack of a significant “Along-Track” PRE mitigated any serious flood problems

Page 35: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Loop from 1200 UTC, 6 Sept. to 0600 UTC, 7 Sept.

Page 36: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

QPE, 1200 UTC, 6 Sept. to 1200 UTC, 7 Sept.

Where heavier rains fell earlier

Page 37: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Ike

Page 38: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Ike Overview

Ike came ashore as a Category 2 Hurricane along the TX coast around 0600 UTC, 13 Sept.

Synoptic Back-drop: Large southeastern U.S. ridge and western

states troughiness Deep southerly flow regime over the southern Plains

and up the Mississippi Valley

Page 39: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

700 mb Heights/Winds, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Page 40: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

925 mb Heights/Theta-E and 200 mb Winds, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Theta-E Ridge Line

Page 41: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Ike Falls Within the CG Category; CG TC Tracks and PRE Locations

All CG Tracks All CG PPTC Tracks; with PRE centroids (colored dots)

Page 42: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

PRE Outlook

Synoptic setting seemed favorable for potential PRE development poleward of Ike TC embedded within southerly 700 mb flow,

with trough upstream Strengthening upper-level jet streak to the

north/northeast Sharpening 925 mb theta-e ridge axis Nearly stationary low-level boundary

Page 43: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Derived Total Precipitable Water, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Channel of Moisture Inflow

LIke

Page 44: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Precipitable Water, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Page 45: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

850 mb Moisture Transport, 0600 UTC, 12 Sept.

Page 46: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Loop, 0000 – 1800 UTC, 12 Sept.

Page 47: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Parcel Trajectories

Red – About 850 mbBlue – About 700 mbGreen – About 500 mb

LIke

Page 48: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Total Rainfall for PRE in Southern KS

Page 49: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Flood Pictures (West Wichita, KS)

Page 50: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

700 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

L

Ike

Page 51: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

300 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

Page 52: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

925 mb Analysis, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

L

Ike

Page 53: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

850 mb Moisture Transport, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

Page 54: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Precipitable Water, 1200 UTC, 13 Sept.

Page 55: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Loop, 0600-1800 UTC, 13 Sept.

Page 56: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Total Rainfall for PRE in Northern IL

Page 57: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Ike’s Significant PRE

Two well defined PRE First from central OK to southern KS late on

Thu., 9/11 and early Fri., 9/12 Widespread 6”+ rainfall, with an embedded

band of 10-15” (Wichita, KS set all-time 24-hour precipitation record (nearly 11”))

Second from northern MO/southeastern IA to northern IL/IN

Several bands of 5-10” rainfall (locally higher amounts)

Page 58: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Ike’s Direct Rainfall Shield

TC Ike picked up speed as it gained latitude A band of 3-6” rainfall spread from the southern

Plains, to the Mississippi Valley, to the Lower Great Lakes region

Fortunately for KS, most of this rainfall occurred east of the Wichita area

Parts of MO and IL not so lucky Exacerbated existing flood problems from the PRE

Page 59: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Radar Loop from 1800 UTC, 13 Sept. to 1200 UTC, 14 Sept.

Page 60: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

QPE, from 0600-1200 UTC, 14 Sept.

Hardest hit areas from Ike’s first PRE

Page 61: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

QPE, from 1200-1800 UTC, 14 Sept.

Hardest hit areas from Ike’s second PRE

Page 62: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Flood Pictures (Chicago area)

Page 63: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

Summary

Fay produced very heavy rainfall; but no PRE Strong ridge to the north/northeast prevented significant moisture

advection outward from the TC’s circulation center Hanna produced a transient PRE-like feature to its north

Fast PRE movement kept rainfall amounts down Not much overlap between PRE and direct TC rainfall

Ike produced two substantial PRE Stationary forcing features (frontal boundary and back-building

upper-level jet) were better able to anchor/lift deep tropical moisture plume

PRE had considerably more impact than direct TC rainfall in KS

PRE + TC rainfall created major runoff problems in MO and IL

Page 64: Michael L. Jurewicz, Sr. NOAA/NWS, Binghamton, NY Northeast Regional Operational Workshop

The End !!

Any Questions ??