32
MICROSTRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF Al-ALLOY WITH RARE EARTH NATEG MOHAMMAD DIAB UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

MICROSTRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF Al …eprints.utm.my/id/eprint/48722/25/NategMohammadDiabMFKM2015.pdf · content of La is 1.0%, the iron-rich phases tend to be slender

  • Upload
    lekien

  • View
    212

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

1

MICROSTRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF Al-ALLOY

WITH RARE EARTH

NATEG MOHAMMAD DIAB

UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA

4

MICROSTRUCTURE AND MECHANICAL PROPERTIES OF AL-ALLOY

WITH RARE EARTH

NATEG MOHAMMAD DIAB

A project report submitted in partial fulfilment of the

requirements for the award of the degree of

Master of Engineering (Materials Engineering)

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering

Universiti Teknologi Malaysia

JANUARY 2015

iii

To

My beloved family

iv

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

First of all I would like to thank Allah for this valuable time given, where I

had the chance to understand about His wonders on materials.

I am deeply grateful to my supervisor, Prof Dr. Jamaliah Binti Idris for her

guidance, patience and support. I have been extremely lucky to have a supervisor

who cared so much about my work, and who responded to my questions and queries

so promptly.

My thanks are also due to the staff, faculty members, and technicians of the

Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, who contributed

to my research.

I am most grateful to my wife, family and close friends for their infinite

support, patience and encouragements during these years.

v

ABSTRACT

The development of aluminum alloys is of great interest to many of the

industries and biomedical applications, because they provide a high strength to weight

ratio, high wear resistance, low density and low coefficient of thermal expansion

compared with other materials. These improvements in the field of application make the

study of their mechanical behavior of utmost importance. However, these alloys possess

some limitations in terms of the interactive effects of additives. Therefore, the present

study aims to investigate the influence of the rare-earth, e.g., Lanthanum and yttrium

with the amounts of 0.5, 1.0, and 1.5 wt.% on the microstructure and mechanical

properties of hypereutectic Al-Si and hypoeutectic Al-Mg alloys. The microscopic

observations contain of optical, field emission scanning electron, energy dispersive

spectroscopy and X-ray diffraction, and mechanical properties testing, such as tensile,

impact, and hardness test were carried out. A good agreement was observed between the

results of microstructure and mechanical properties. XRD and EDS results indicate the

formation of intermetallic compounds that associated with the modifications, which may

play a major cause in improving the mechanical properties. It was also found that the

secondary dendrite arm spacing value became smaller with increasing La addition, and

decreased slightly from the unmodified 5 μm to 4.1 μm. On the other hand, when the

content of La is 1.0%, the iron-rich phases tend to be slender with a size of about 0.5 μm.

While with the addition of 1.0 wt.% of Y, the volume fraction of the dendritic phase are

tend to decrease along with increase the grain size to 40 µm. The modifications of Al-

alloy eutectic structure were improved ductility from 0.7% and 8% to 1.8 and 10.5 with

the addition of 1.0 wt.% of La and Y, respectively. However, the addition of 1.0 wt.% of

La and Y led to increase the ultimate tensile strength from 100 MPa and 180 MPa to 150

MPa and 200 MPa, respectively. A further addition of La and Y results in a reduction in

mechanical properties.

vi

ABSTRAK

Pembangunan aloi aluminium telah menarik minat pelbagai industri dan aplikasi

perubatan, di sebabkan aloi ini mempunyai kekuatan tinggi berbanding nisbah berat,

rintangan lelasan yang tinggi, ketumpatan yang rendah dan pekali pengembangan haba

yang rendah jika di bandingkan dengan bahan lain. Penambahbaikan dalam bidang

aplikasi menyebabkan penyelidikan berkaitan sifat mekaniknya tersangat penting.

Walaubagaimanapun aloi ini mempunyai limitasi dari segi kesan interaktif terhadap

bahan tambah. Oleh itu kajian ini bertujuan mengkaji pengaruh nadir bumi, seperti

Lantanium dan Yitrium dengan jumlah 0.5, 1.0 dan 1.5 % berat keatas mikrostruktur dan

sifat mekanik aloi hipoeutektik Al-Si dan aloi hipoeutektik Al-Mg. Pemerhatian di

lakukan melalui mikroskop optik, mikroskop imbasan, spektroskopi tenaga serakan

(XPS) dan difraktor sinaran-X (XRD), dan ujian sifat mekanik seperti ujian tegangan,

impak dan kekerasan juga telah di jalankan. Satu keputusan sepadanan di antara

keputusan mikrostruktur dan sifat mekanik telah di perolehi. Keputusan XRD dan XPS

mendapati pembentukan sebatian antaralogam terbentuk selepas modifikasi, memainkan

peranan utama dalam peningkatan sifat mekanik. Kajian juga mendapati jarak lelengan

dendrit sekunder menjadi kecil dengan pertambahan La, dan berkurang sedikit jika di

bandingkan dari aloi asal dari 5 mikron kepada 4.1 mikron. Di sebaliknya jika jumlah La

sebanyak 1.0%, fasa tinggi-ferum akan mengecil kepada 0.5 mikron. Sementara

penambahan Y sebanyak 1.0%, nisbah isipadu fasa dendrit akan berkurang sepadan

dengan kenaikan saiz bijian kepada 40 mikron. Modifikasi struktur eutektik aloi-Al

menambahbaik kemuluran dari 0.7% dan 8% kepada 1.8 dan 10.5 dengan kemasukan La

dan Y sebanyak 1.0% berat masing masing. Walaubagaimanapun , penambahan 1.0% La

dan Y meningkatkan kekuatan tegangan muktamad dari 100MPa dan 180 MPa kepada

150 MPa dan 200 MPa masing masing. Penambahan seterusnya La dan Y menghasilkan

penurunan sifat mekanik bahan aloi tersebut

vii

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CHAPTER TITLE PAGE

DECLARATION ii

DEDICATION iii

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT iv

ABSTRACT v

ABSTRAK

TABLE OF CONTENTS vii

LIST OF TABLES x

LIST OF FIGURES xi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS xvi

LIST OF SYMBOLS xvii

LIST OF APPENDICES xviii

1 INTRODUCTION 1

1.1 Background 1

1.2 Problem Statement 3

1.3 Purpose of the Study 3

1.4 Objectives of the Study 4

1.5 Scope of the Study 4

1.6 Significance of the Study 5

2 LITERATURE REVIEW 6

2.1 Aluminum Alloys 6

2.2 Designation of Aluminium Alloys 7

viii

2.3 Properties of Aluminium Alloys 8

2.4 Aluminium-Silicon Alloy 8

2.5 Complex Al-Si-Cu-Mg Alloy System 9

2.5.1 Solidification of Al-Si-Cu-Mg Alloys 11

2.5.2 Properties of Al-Si-Cu-Mg Alloys 15

2.6 Wrought Aluminium Alloy A5083 Series

Characteristics 16

2.7 Binary Aluminium Magnesium System 16

2.8 Grain Refinement 18

2.8.1 Mechanism of Grain Refinement 19

2.8.2 Dendrite Coherency Point (DCP) 22

2.9 Modification of Eutectic Silicon 23

2.9.1 Effect of Modifications on the Structure of

Al-alloys 25

2.9.2 Effect of Modifications on the Mechanical

Properties of Al-alloys 32

3 RESEARCH METHODOLOGY 38

3.1 Introduction 38

3.2 Alloy Preparation 40

3.3 Addition of Elements 40

3.4 Microstructural Characterization and Chemical

Analysis 41

3.5 X-ray Diffraction 42

3.6 Mechanical Testing 42

4 RESULT AND DISCUSSION 45

4.1 Introduction 45

4.2 Effect of La Additions on the Microstructure and

Mechanical Properties of A390 Alloy 46

4.2.1 Microstructural Characteristics 46

4.2.2 Mechanical Properties 56

4.2.2.1 Tensile Test 56

ix

4.2.2.2 Impact Test 59

4.2.2.3 Hardness Measurement 60

4.3 Effect of Y Additions on the Microstructure and

Mechanical Properties of A5083 Alloy 61

4.3.1 Microstructural Characteristics 61

4.3.2 Mechanical Properties 72

4.3.2.1 Tensile Test 72

4.3.2.2 Impact Test 74

4.3.2.3 Hardness Measurements 75

4.4 Comparison of the Hardness and Impact Test of

the La And Y Additions 76

5 CONCLUSIONS AND FUTURE WORK 78

5.1 Conclusions 78

5.2 Recommendations for Future Work 79

REFERENCES 80

Appendices A 89

x

LIST OF TABLES

TABLE NO TITLE PAGE

2.1 Designation of aluminum alloys and their

applications 7

2.2 Influence of alloying elements in Al-Si system 11

2.3 Physical properties of common modifier elements 26

2.4 Summary of different modifying agents 32

2.5 Ultimate and yield tensile strengths (UTS and YS),

elongation (d), and the Vickers hardness (HV) of an

Al-9wt % Si sample 33

2.6 Mechanical Properties of Al-Si alloys 34

2.7 Mechanical properties of unmodified and modified

Al-Si alloys 36

3.1 As received chemical composition of complex Al-

alloys used in this study (wt.%) 39

xi

LIST OF FIGURES

FIGURE NO TITLE PAGE

2.1 a) Optical micrograph of brittle and hard silicon

particles in a soft and ductile aluminium matrix, b)

result of the loading of material 10

2.2 a) Binary Al-Si phase diagram [27, 28] and b)

assembly of Al-Si-Cu ternary phase diagrams 12

2.3 Solidification process of complex Al-Si-Cu-Mg

alloy: a) primary aluminium dendrite, b) eutectic

Al-Si and iron intermetallic, and c) formation of

copper rich intermetallic in the forms of eutectic

and block-like 13

2.4 a) Optical micrograph and b) scanning electron

microscopy micrographs of coarse flake silicon in

Al-7%Si alloy 14

2.5 Possible eutectic growth morphologies: a) planar-

front growth opposite to the thermal gradient; b)

nucleation and growth of the primary Al dendrites;

c) independent heterogeneous nucleation and

growth of eutectic grains in interdendritic spaces 14

2.6 Al-Mg phase diagram 17

2.7 Dendritic α-aluminium a) before and b) after grain

refinement Process 19

2.8 a) Nucleation of aluminium on TiAl3 surface and

b) cooling curve 20

xii

2.9 Al-Ti binary phase diagram exhibits peritectic

transformation to release TiAl3 particles 21

2.10 a) free dendrites and b) dendrite coherency point 22

2.11 Optical micrographs of Al-7Si alloy a) without Sr

addition and b) with Sr addition 24

2.12 Growth mechanisms in a) normal structure, b) Na

modified structure and c) quench modified

structure (λ T: average twin spacing, L: distance

between steps) 25

2.13 Optical photomicrographs eutectic silicon

morphology as a function of strontium level: a)

Fully unmodified, b) lamellar, c) partially

modified, d) modified and e) very fine 28

2.14 Morphology of silicon: a) without modifier, b) with

0.2% Sb 29

2.15 Optical micrograph of eutectic silicon in a) without

a modifier, b) 890 ppm Ba, c) 700 ppm Y and d)

6300 ppm Yb 30

2.16 a) Ultimate tensile strength and fracture elongation,

b) quality index of Al-Si alloy as a function of Sr

content 35

3.1 Flowchart of research methodology 39

3.2 Production of the cast materials, (a) Silicon carbide

crucible, (b) Cast iron mold 40

3.3 Electron microscope facilities for analyzing the

microstructure; a) optical; b) field emission

scanning 41

3.4 X-Ray Diffractometer equipment 42

3.5 Dimension of a) tensile and b) Charpy impact test

bar according to standard in mm 43

3.6 a) Instron universal mechanical testing machine, b)

Zwick impact testing machine 44

xiii

4.1 4.1 Optical (left side) and scanning electron

micrographs (right side) of the A390 alloy with and

without the addition of La; (a,e) o wt.% La, (b,f)

0.5 wt.% La, (c,g) 1.0 wt.% La, and (d,h) 1.5 wt.%

La 47

4.2 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A390 alloy); (a)

scanned area, (b) spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 50

4.3 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A390 alloy) with

the addition of 0.5 wt.% La; (a) scanned area, (b)

spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 51

4.4 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A390 alloy) with

the addition of 1.0 wt.% La; (a) scanned area, (b)

spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 52

4.5 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A390 alloy) with

the addition of 1.5 wt.% La; (a) scanned area, (b)

spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 53

4.6 Elemental dot mapping of unmodified sample of

A390 alloy 54

4.7 Elemental dot mapping of modified sample

containing 1.0 wt.% La 55

4.8 X-ray diffraction patterns of unmodified and

modified samples of different amount of La

additions 56

4.9 Tensile test results composed of YS, UTS, El% and

elasticity modulus of base alloy with different

amount of La additions 58

4.10 Fractured surfaces of a) base alloy, b) 0.5 wt. %

La, c) 1.0 wt. % La and d) 1.5 wt. % La alloys

subjected to tensile testing 59

4.11 Energy absorbed of fracture for base alloy and

modified alloys with 0.5 wt.%, 1.0 wt.% and 1.5

wt.% La additions 60

xiv

4.12 Hardness values versus the percentage of

Lanthanum 61

4.13 Optical (left side) and scanning electron

micrographs (right side) of the A5083 alloy with

and without the addition of Y; (a,e) o wt.% Y, (b,f)

0.5 wt.% Y, (c,g) 1.0 wt.% Y, and (d,h) 1.5 wt.% Y 63

4.14 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A390 alloy); (a)

scanned area, (b) spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 64

4.15 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A5083 alloy) with

the addition of 0.5 wt.% Y; (a) scanned area, (b)

spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 65

4.16 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A5083 alloy) with

the addition of 1.0 wt.% Y; (a) scanned area, (b)

spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 66

4.17 EDS spectrum of the base alloy (A5083 alloy) with

the addition of 1.5 wt.% Y; (a) scanned area, (b)

spectrum 1, and (c) spectrum 2 67

4.18 Elemental dot mapping of unmodified sample of

A5083 alloy 69

4.19 Elemental dot mapping of modified sample of

A5083 alloy 70

4.20 X-ray diffraction patterns of unmodified and

modified samples of different amount of Y

additions 71

4.21 Tensile test results composed of YS, UTS, El% and

elasticity modulus of base alloy with different

amount of Y additions 73

4.22 Fractured surfaces of a) 0 wt. % Y, b) 0.5 wt. % Y,

c) 1.0 wt. % Y and d) 1.5 wt. % Y alloys subjected

to tensile testing 74

4.23 Energy absorbed of fracture for A5083 and

modified alloys with 0.5 wt.%, 1.0 wt.% and 1.5

wt.% Y additions 75

xv

4.24 Hardness values versus the percentage of Yttrium 76

4.25 Comparison between the results of La and Y

addition; (a) Microhardness; (b) Absorbed Energy 77

xvi

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

DAS - Dendrite Arm Spacing

MR - - Modification Rate

EDS - Energy dispersive spectroscopy

FE-SEM - Field emission scanning electron microscopy

OM - Optical microscope

XRD - X-ray diffraction

UTS - Ultimate Tensile Strength

YS - Yield Strength

xvii

LIST OF SYMBOLS

- Fracture strain

- Fracture stress

a.u - arbitrary unit

Hv - Vicker’s hardness

K/min - Kelvin per minute

oC - Centigrade degree

T - Temperature

Wt.% - Weight percentage

α-Al - primary aluminum dendrite

s - Second

xviii

LIST OF APPENDICES

APPENDIX TITLE PAGE

A Tensile stress-strain values for A390 and A5083

alloys with different concentration of (a) La; (b)

Y 89

1

CHAPTER 1

INTRODUCTION

1.1 Background

With the aims of giving light and rationally high quality mechanical

characteristic materials, expenditure and energy efficiency and also reduction of

harmful effects on the ecosystem, the aluminum industries are moving towards using

secondary aluminum in the form of returns and scrap as a replacement of virgin

ingots [1]. Nevertheless, they are challenged by buildup of contaminants from the

crumbs and returns applied. The secondary matter is basically made up of molding

and bent crumbs of aluminum alloys, and like the pollution matter of the secondary

alloys, relies on the manner of production technique. The Si part of the mold is

customized, since a development twin has been made at the border when the

proportion of atomic radius of the metal in relation to silicon goes beyond limit 1.65

[2].

Modification of silicon is known as melt treatment, mostly used to form Al-

Si-Mg and Al-Si-Cu-Mg alloys to sustain the material trait and technical needs. It is

also acceptable that doping of modifier metals could have transformation in the

metallurgical qualities of silicon in the eutectic stage, where the framework could

influence the mechanical aspects of Al-Si moldings [2]. Hard and brittle silicon parts

2

do enhance the outcome and overall tensile power of softer aluminum frames but

cause poor ductility. To eliminate this weakness, the morphology of Si particles is

changed from flake or acicular form into fibrous and globular form by introduction

of adjusting elements [3, 4]. Additionally, it is achievable to lessen the elucidation

time throughout heat dealing if modifier is used [5]. Nonetheless, the addition of

modifier catalysts over a particular quantity will increase permeability, hydrogen

contents [6], hot splitting, poor exterior finish [7] and excess of modification which

leave destructive effect on quality [8]. Achievement and efficiency of the

modification procedure should be aided by good and reliable investigation methods

so that reliable and precise data can be obtained and accurately read. Metallographic

and chemical examinations are some of the common and the conventional methods

applied for sample examination. They take a lot of time, destructive [9], inclusive of

post process management and their outcomes are reliant on area model assortment

and research conditions.

The latest research included the fusion of uncommon earth elements, like La,

Y, Ce, Yb and Er into aluminum alloy to study the influence on the microstructure

and mechanical characteristics. As an example, a good quantity of La was used to

alter the microstructure of the molten alloy, and enhance the mechanical

characteristics, conductivity of electricity and thermal resistance [10]. Alongside, it

was speculated that the use of 3 wt.% La should contribute to a small modification

change in the silicon stages in A390 as prospected for the development of the

Al7Si7Cu2La3.5 and Al5Mg8Cu6Si6, which means the plate-like silicon morphology

has no refinement with the excess La in the alloy [11]. Besides, the rare earth La was

found able to speed up the age-hardening development of 6061 alloys [12].

Nonetheless, the available reports did not study the mechanical aspects. The best

amount of La and Y accumulations were found in A390 and A5083 alloys,

correspondingly. Thus, the present research aims to investigate the optimum

addition level of La and Y to modify the eutectic phase of A390 and A5083 alloys,

and its effect on the microstructure and mechanical properties.

3

1.2 Problem Statement

Even though the application of secondary materials has risen, particularly in

the manufacture of aluminum based items, their application nonetheless creates

technical disadvantages mostly related with the impurities that may root from

chemical corruption and counteract the influence of rare earth metals like lanthanum

and yttrium on the framework and characteristics of Aluminum-alloys. Alterations

may happen when an alloy crump, that has one type of refiner, is re-melted with the

primary ingot and treated with a different percentage of modifiers. Thus, the effect

and correct levels of other elements such as lanthanum and yttrium present in the

melts need to be understood and are very essential in ensuring casting quality.

1.3 Purpose of the Study

This research addresses the problems described above, namely understanding

on the probable interaction between the additive and the alloy element in secondary

material alloys. The results obtained from this study will represent a technological

step towards increased usage of secondary alloys in the aluminum industries. The

individual effect of La and Y with different weight percentage additions of 0.5, 1,

and 1.5 on the binary and ternary alloy A390 and A5083 alloys, respectively, were

investigated. The results of this study were then compared with those of

microstructural observations, as well as mechanical property tests, for hardness,

impact and tensile strength.

4

1.4 Objectives of the Study

This study is geared towards achieving the following objectives:

1. To evaluate the modification and gain refinement treatments of the

eutectic Al-Si structure in secondary materials through additions of La

and Y using the microstructural observation.

2. To establish the correlation between results of structure, morphology and

the concentration of additive element.

3. To evaluate the effects of different percentages of La and Y additions on

the mechanical properties of the Al-alloys, e.g., A390 and A5083 alloy.

1.5 Scope of the Study

1. The binary system of A390 and A5083 alloys were used as the base

alloys. Different concentrations of La and Y (0.5, 1, and 1.5 wt.%)

additions were used to investigate the optimal concentration for

refinement and modification. The melt pouring temperature was set at

around 900 ± 10 °C.

2. Microstructural observations were carried out to investigate the effect of

addition on the structure and morphology of Al- alloy via optical

microscopy, X-ray diffraction, and Field emission scanning electron

microscopy.

3. Energy dispersive scanning electron microscopy, along with elements

mapping, was carried out to identify the chemical composition of the new

intermetallic/precipitate that was formed due to the addition, associated

with the elemental distribution of the alloy compound in the

microstructure.

5

4. Mechanical properties investigation was conducted to identify the effects

of La and Y additions on the tensile, impact and hardness properties of Al

alloy.

1.6 Significance of the Study

The research work reported in this thesis is significant in providing new

knowledge and understanding of the interaction between different percentages of

additive with the properties of base alloy elements during melting of secondary

aluminum alloys. Upon further implementation, the aluminum industries will benefit

from this research work in terms of increased productivity, quality and cost and time

savings due to increased use of aluminum-based secondary alloys. The research

outcomes will also contribute towards sustainability of available material resources

and better environmental protection through reduced materials waste.

80

REFERENCES

1. Das, S. K., Green, J. A., Kaufman, J. G., Emadi, D. and Mahfoud, M.

Aluminum Recycling—An Integrated, Industrywide Approach. JOM. 2010.

62(2): 23-26.

2. Knuutinen, A., Nogita, K., McDonald, S. and Dahle, A. Modification of Al–

Si alloys with Ba, Ca, Y and Yb. Journal of Light Metals. 2001. 1(4): 229

240.

3. Liao, H., Sun, Y. and Sun, G. Effect of Al-5Ti-1B on the Microstructure of

Near-Eutectic Al-13.0% Si Alloys Modified with Sr. Journal of Materials

Science. 2002. 37(16): 3489-3495.

4. Tenekedjiev, N. and Gruzleski, J. Hypereutectic Aluminum-Silicon Casting

Alloys—A Review. Cast Met. 1990. 3(2): 96-105.

5. Sigworth, G. K. and Kuhn, T. A. Grain Refinement of Aluminum Casting

Alloys. AFS Transactions. 2007. 115: 1-12.

6. Xiufang, B., Weimin, W. and Jingyu, Q. Liquid Structure of Al–12.5% Si

Alloy Modified by Antimony. Materials Characterization. 2001. 46(1): 25-

29.

7. Dahle, A., Nogita, K., McDonald, S., Dinnis, C. and Lu, L. Eutectic

Modification and Microstructure Development in Al–Si Alloys. Materials

Science and Engineering: A. 2005. 413: 243-248.

8. Hegde, S. and Prabhu, K. N. Modification of Eutectic Silicon in Al–Si alloys.

Journal of Materials Science. 2008. 43(9): 3009-3027.

9. Closset, B., Pirie, K. and Gruzleski, J. Comparison of Thermal Analysis and

Electrical Resistivity in Microstructure Evaluation of Al–Si Foundry Alloys.

AFS Trans. 1984. 92: 123-133.

81

10. Yuan, W., Liang, Z., Zhang, C. and Wei, L. Effects of La Addition on the

Mechanical Properties and Thermal-Resistant Properties of Al–Mg–Si–Zr

Alloys Based on AA 6201. Materials & Design. 2012. 34(0): 788-792.

11. Yi, H., Zhang, D., Sakata, T. and Mori, H. Microstructures and La-rich

Compounds in a Cu-containing Hypereutectic Al–Si alloy. Journal of Alloys

and Compounds. 2003. 354(1): 159-164.

12. Yile, Y. Effects of La on Microstructure and Age-hardening Behaviour of

6061 Alloy. Hot Working Technology. 2009. 20: 016.

13. Gaber, A., Gaffar, M., Mostafa, M. and Zeid, E. Precipitation Kinetics of Al–

1.12 Mg2 Si–0.35 Si and Al–1.07 Mg2Si–0.33 Cu alloys. Journal of Alloys

and Compounds. 2007. 429(1): 167-175.

14. Davis, J. R. and Davis, J. R. Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys: ASM

International. 1993.

15. Gruzleski, J. E. and Closset, B. M. The Treatment of Liquid Aluminum-Silicon

Alloys: Amer Foundry Society. 1990.

16. Wang, W. Na, Sr and Sb Interactions in Al-Si Alloy Melts and Their Effects

on Modification: McGill University. 1991.

17. Basavakumar, K., Mukunda, P. and Chakraborty, M. Effect of Melt

Treatment on Microstructure and Impact Properties of Al-7Si and Al-7Si-2.5

Cu cast alloys. Bulletin of Materials Science. 2007. 30(5): 439-445.

18. Prasada Rao, A., Das, K., Murty, B. and Chakraborty, M. Effect of Grain

Refinement on Wear Properties of Al and Al–7Si Alloy. Wear. 2004. 257(1):

148-153.

19. Ye, H. An Overview of the Development of Al-Si-Alloy Based Material for

Engine Applications. Journal of Materials Engineering and Performance.

2003. 12(3): 288-297.

20. Warmuzek, M. Aluminum-silicon Casting Alloys: An Atlas of

Microfractographs: A S M International. 2004.

21. Stefanescu, D. M., Metals, A. S. f. and Committee, A. I. H. Casting: ASM

International. 1988.

22. Polmear, I. Light Alloys: From Traditional Alloys to Nanocrystals: Elsevier

Science. 2005.

82

23. Makhlouf, M. and Guthy, H. The Aluminum–Silicon Eutectic Reaction:

Mechanisms and Crystallography. Journal of Light Metals. 2001. 1(4): 199-

218.

24. Taylor, J. A., StJohn, D. H., Barresi, J. and Couper, M. J. Influence of Mg

Content on the Microstructure and Solid Solution Chemistry of Al-7% Si-Mg

Casting Alloys During Solution Treatment. Proceedings of the Materials

Science Forum: Trans Tech Publ. 277-282.

25. Dinnis, C. M., Taylor, J. A. and Dahle, A. K. As-cast Morphology of Iron-

Intermetallics in Al–Si Foundry Alloys. Scripta Materialia. 2005. 53(8): 955-

958.

26. Crepeau, P. Effect of Iron in Al-Si Casting Alloys: A Critical Review (95-

110). Transactions of the American Foundrymen's Society. 1995. 103: 361-

366.

27. Baker, H. and Okamoto, H. ASM Handbook. Alloy Phase Diagrams. 1992. 3:

2.

28. Canales, A., Talamantes-Silva, J., Gloria, D., Valtierra, S. and Colás, R.

Thermal Analysis During Solidification of Cast Al–Si alloys. Thermochimica

Acta. 2010. 510(1): 82-87.

29. Shankar, S., Riddle, Y. W. and Makhlouf, M. M. Nucleation Mechanism of

the Eutectic Phases in Aluminum–Silicon Hypoeutectic Alloys. Acta

Materialia. 2004. 52(15): 4447-4460.

30. G.E., B. Qualification of Solidification Characteristics of Al-Si Alloys by

Thermal Analysis. 1997.

31. Dinnis, C. M., Dahle, A. K. and Taylor, J. A. Three-dimensional Analysis of

Eutectic Grains in Hypoeutectic Al–Si Alloys. Materials Science and

Engineering: A. 2005. 392(1): 440-448.

32. Nafisi, S. and Ghomashchi, R. Combined Grain Refining and Modification of

Conventional and Rheo-Cast A356 Al–Si Alloy. Materials Characterization.

2006. 57(4): 371-385.

33. Nogita, K., Knuutinen, A., McDonald, S. and Dahle, A. Mechanisms of

Eutectic Solidification in Al–Si Alloys Modified with Ba, Ca, Y and Yb.

Journal of Light Metals. 2001. 1(4): 219-228.

83

34. Peter, O. Characterization of Intermetallic Particles in Aluminium Alloy

AA5083 Series After Recrystalization Heat Treatment. Universiti Malaysia

Pahang; 2007.

35. StJohn, D. H., Qian, M., Easton, M. A., Cao, P. and Hildebrand, Z. Grain

Refinement of Magnesium Alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions

A. 2005. 36(7): 1669-1679.

36. Dantzig, J. A. and Rappaz, M. Solidification: EFPL Press. 2009.

37. Liao, H. and Sun, G. Mutual Poisoning Effect Between Sr and B in Al–Si

Casting Alloys. Scripta materialia. 2003. 48(8): 1035-1039.

38. Mohanty, P. and Gruzleski, J. Grain Refinement Mechanisms of

Hypoeutectic Al-Si Alloys. Acta Materialia. 1996. 44(9): 3749-3760.

39. Qiu, D., Taylor, J., Zhang, M. and Kelly, P. A mechanism for the Poisoning

Effect of Silicon on the Grain Refinement of Al–Si alloys. Acta Materialia.

2007. 55(4): 1447-1456.

40. Yu, L., Liu, X., Wang, Z. and Bian, X. Grain Refinement of A356 Alloy by

AlTiC/AlTiB Master Alloys. Journal of Materials Science. 2005. 40(14):

3865-3867.

41. Dahle, A. K., StJohn, D. H., Attavanich, P. and Taopetch, P. Grain Formation

in AlSi7Mg0. 35 Foundry Alloy at Low Superheat. Proceedings of the

Materials Science Forum: Trans Tech Publ. 271-276.

42. Emadi, D., Whiting, L., Nafisi, S. and Ghomashchi, R. Applications of

Thermal Analysis in Quality Control of Solidification Processes. Journal of

Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry. 2005. 81(1): 235-242.

43. Chai, G., BÄckerud, L., RØlland, T. and Arnberg, L. Dendrite Coherency

During Equiaxed Solidification in Binary Aluminum Alloys. Metallurgical

and Materials Transactions A. 1995. 26(4): 965-970.

44. Mackay, R., Djurdjevic, M. and Sokolowski, J. Effect of Cooling Rate on

Fraction Solid of Metallurgical Reactions in 319 Alloy. Proceedings of the

Transactions of the American Foundry Society and the One Hundred Fourth

Annual Castings Congress. 521-530.

45. Arnberg, L., Chai, G. and Backerud, L. Determination of Dendritic

Coherency in Solidifying Melts by Rheological Measurements. Materials

Science and Engineering: A. 1993. 173(1): 101-103.

84

46. Veldman, N. L., Dahle, A. K., StJohn, D. H. and Arnberg, L. Dendrite

Coherency of Al-Si-Cu Alloys. Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A.

2001. 32(1): 147-155.

47. Malekan, M. and Shabestari, S. Effect of Grain Refinement on the Dendrite

Coherency Point During Solidification of the A319 Aluminum Alloy.

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 2009. 40(13): 3196-3203.

48. Apelian, D. Aluminum Cast Alloys: Enabling Tools for Improved

Performance. North American Die Casting Association. Wheeling, Illinois.

2009.

49. Wang, R., Lu, W. and Hogan, L. Self-Modification in Direct Electrolytic Al–

Si Alloys (DEASA) and its Structural Inheritance. Materials Science and

Engineering: A. 2003. 348(1): 289-298.

50. Aladar, P. Alloy. Google Patents. 1921.

51. Bian, X. F., Zhang, Z. H. and Liu, X. F. Effect of Strontium Modification on

Hydrogen Content and Porosity Shape of Al-Si Alloys. Proceedings of the

Materials science forum: Trans Tech Publ. 361-366.

52. Kang, H., Yoon, W., Kim, K., Kim, M., Yoon, Y. and Cho, I. Effective

Parameter for the Selection of Modifying Agent for Al–Si alloy. Materials

Science and Engineering: A. 2007. 449: 334-337.

53. Qiyang, L., Qingchun, L. and Qifu, L. Modification of Al-Si alloys with

Sodium. Acta Metallurgica et Materialia. 1991. 39(11): 2497-2502.

54. Xiufang, B., Junhua, C., Xiangfa, L., Xiujuan, Y. and Furong, R. The Effect

of Magnesium on the Antimony Modification of Al− Si. JOM. 1997. 49(2):

35-36.

55. Lu, L., Nogita, K. and Dahle, A. Combining Sr and Na Additions in

Hypoeutectic Al–Si Foundry Alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A.

2005. 399(1): 244-253.

56. Khan, S., Ourdjini, A., Named, Q., Najafabadi, M. A. and Elliott, R. Hardness

and Mechanical Property Relationships in Directionally Solidified

Aluminium-Silicon Eutectic Alloys with Different Silicon Morphologies.

Journal of Materials Science. 1993. 28(21): 5957-5962.

57. Djurdjevic, M., Jiang, H. and Sokolowski, J. On-line Prediction of

Aluminum–Silicon Eutectic Modification Level Using Thermal Analysis.

Materials Characterization. 2001. 46(1): 31-38.

85

58. A., A. Effect of Ca as a Modifier in Hypoeutectic AI-Si alloys. 1998.

59. Kumari, S., Pillai, R. and Pai, B. Structure and Properties of Calcium and

Strontium Treated Al–7Si–0.3 Mg alloy: A Comparison. Journal of Alloys

and Compounds. 2008. 460(1): 472-477.

60. Zhang, X., Su, G., Ju, C., Wang, W. and Yan, W. Effect of Modification

Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Al–0.35%

Mg–7.0% Si cast alloy. Materials & Design. 2010. 31(9): 4408-4413.

61. Chen, C., Liu, Z.-X., Ren, B., Wang, M.-X., Weng, Y.-G. And Liu, Z.-Y.

Influences of Complex Modification of P and RE on Microstructure and

Mechanical Properties of Hypereutectic Al-20Si Alloy. Transactions of

Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2007. 17(2): 301-306.

62. Shi, W., Gao, B., Tu, G., Li, S., Hao, Y. And Yu, F. Effect of Neodymium on

Primary Silicon and Mechanical Properties of Hypereutectic Al-15% Si

Alloy. Journal of Rare Earths. 2010. 28: 367-370.

63. Shi, W., Gao, B., Tu, G. and Li, S. Effect of Nd on Microstructure and Wear

Resistance of Hypereutectic Al–20% Si alloy. Journal of Alloys and

Compounds. 2010. 508(2): 480-485.

64. Xing, P., Gao, B., Zhuang, Y., Liu, K. and Tu, G. On the Modification of

Hypereutectic Al-Si Alloys Using Rare Earth Er. Acta Metallurgica Sinica-

English Letters. 2010. 23(5): 327-333.

65. Tsai, Y.-C., Chou, C.-Y., Lee, S.-L., Lin, C.-K., Lin, J.-C. and Lim, S. Effect

of trace La Addition on the Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of

A356 (Al–7Si–0.35 Mg) Aluminum Alloys. Journal of Alloys and

Compounds. 2009. 487(1): 157-162.

66. Prasada Rao, A. and Mahfoud, M. Effect of Cadmium on the Microstructure

of Al–7Si alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2010. 491(1): L8-L10.

67. Mondolfo, L. F. Aluminum Alloys: Structure and Properties, Vol. 5:

Butterworths London. 1976.

68. Dobrzański, L., Labisz, K. and Olsen, A. Microstructure and Mechanical

Properties of the Al-Ti alloy with Calcium Addition. Journal of Achievements

in Materials and Manufacturing Engineering. 2008. 26(2): 183-186.

69. Tavitas-Medrano, F., Gruzleski, J., Samuel, F., Valtierra, S. and Doty, H.

Effect of Mg and Sr-modification on the Mechanical Properties of 319-type

86

Aluminum Cast Alloys Subjected to Artificial Aging. Materials Science and

Engineering: A. 2008. 480(1): 356-364.

70. Krupińska, B., Labisz, K., Dobrzański, L. and Rdzawski, Z. Crystallization

Kinetics of Zn Alloys Modified with Ce, La, Sr, Ti, B. ISSUES. 2010. 1: 2.

71. Krupiński, M., Labisz, K., Dobrzański, L. and Rdzawski, Z. Derivative

Thermo Analysis of the Al-Si Cast Alloy with Addition of Rare Earths

Metals. Archieves of Foundry Engineering. 2010. 10(1): 79-82.

72. Bayraktar, E. and Katundi, D. Development of a New Aluminium Matrix

Composite Reinforced with Iron Oxide (Fe. 2010.)

73. Panušková, M., Tillová, E. and Chalupová, M. Relation Between Mechanical

Properties and Microstructure of Cast Aluminum Alloy AlSi9Cu3. Strength

of Materials. 2008. 40(1): 98-101.

74. Osorio, W. R., Cheung, N., Peixoto, L. C. and Garcia, A. Corrosion

Resistance and Mechanical Properties of an Al 9wt% Si Alloy Treated by

Laser Surface Remelting. Int. J. Electrochem. Sci. 2009. 4: 820-831.

75. Torabian, H., Pathak, J. and Tiwari, S. Wear Characteristics of Al-Si alloys.

Wear. 1994. 172(1): 49-58.

76. Shabestari, S. and Shahri, F. Influence of Modification, Solidification

Conditions and Heat Treatment on the Microstructure and Mechanical

Properties of A356 Aluminum Alloy. Journal of Materials Science. 2004.

39(6): 2023-2032.

77. Drouzy, M., Jacob, S. and Richard, M. Interpretation Of Tensile Results By

Means Of Quality Index And Probable Yield Strength-Application To Al-Si7

Mg Foundry Alloys-France. International Cast Metals Journal. 1980. 5(2):

43-50.

78. Nogita, K., McDonald, S. and Dahle, A. Solidification Mechanisms of

Unmodified and Strontium-Modified Hypereutectic Aluminium–Silicon

Alloys. Philosophical Magazine. 2004. 84(17): 1683-1696.

79. International, A. Standard Specification for Aluminum-Alloy Permanent Mold

Castings. United State, B108/B108M-11. 2011.

80. Hu, Z., Yan, H. and Rao, Y.-s. Effects of Samarium Addition on

Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of as-Cast Al-Si-Cu Alloy.

Transactions of Nonferrous Metals Society of China. 2013. 23(11): 3228-

3234.

87

81. Ravi, M., Pillai, U., Pai, B., Damodaran, A. and Dwarakadasa, E. A Study of

the Influence of Mischmetal Additions to ai-7si-0.3 mg (lm 25/356) Alloy.

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A. 1996. 27(5): 1283-1292.

82. Chang, J., Kim, G., Moon, I. and Choi, C. Rare Earth Concentration in the

Primary Si Crystal in Rare Earth Added Al-21wt.% Si Alloy. Scripta

Materialia. 1998. 39(3): 307-314.

83. Chang, J. and Ko, H. Twin Probability of Eutectic Si in Rare Earth Modified

Al-7wt% Si Alloy. Journal of Materials Science Letters. 2000. 19(3): 197-

199.

84. Chang, J. Crystal Morphology of Eutectic Si in Rare Earth Modified Al-

7wt% Si Alloy. Journal of Materials Science Letters. 2001. 20(14): 1305-

1307.

85. Tsai, Y., Chou, C., Jeng, R., Lee, S. and Lin, C. Effect of Rare Earth

Elements Addition on Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of A356

alloy. International Journal of Cast Metals Research. 2011. 24(2): 83-87.

86. Hu, X., Jiang, F., Ai, F. and Yan, H. Effects of Rare Earth Er Additions on

Microstructure Development and Mechanical Properties of Die-Cast ADC12

Aluminum Alloy. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2012. 538: 21-27.

87. Ceschini, L., Morri, A., Morri, A., Gamberini, A. and Messieri, S. Correlation

Between Ultimate Tensile Strength and solidification Microstructure for the

Sand Cast A357 Aluminium Alloy. Materials & Design. 2009. 30(10): 4525-

4531.

88. Wang, S., Zhou, H. and Kang, Y. The Influence of Rare Earth Elements on

Microstructures and Properties of 6061 Aluminum Alloy Vacuum-Brazed

Joints. Journal of Alloys and Compounds. 2003. 352(1): 79-83.

89. Nogita, K., McDonald, S. D. and Dahle, A. K. Eutectic Modification of Al-Si

Alloys with Rare Earth Metals. Materials Transactions. 2004. 45(2): 323-

326.

90. Samuel, A., Samuel, F. and Doty, H. Observations on the Formation of β-

Al5FeSi Phase in 319 Type Al-Si Alloys. Journal of Materials Science. 1996.

31(20): 5529-5539.

91. Min, S., Kanghua, C. and Lanping, H. Effects of Ce and Ti on the

Microstructures and Mechanical Properties of an Al-Cu-Mg-Ag alloy. Rare

Metals. 2007. 26(1): 28-32.

88

92. Zhang, Y., Zeng, X., Liu, L., Lu, C., Zhou, H., Li, Q. and Zhu, Y. Effects of

Yttrium on Microstructure and Mechanical Properties of Hot-Extruded Mg–

Zn–Y–Zr alloys. Materials Science and Engineering: A. 2004. 373(1): 320-

327.

93. Daqing, W. Q. Effects of Yttrium on Microstructure and Mechanical

Properties of AlZnMgCu Alloy [J]. Journal Of China University Of Mining &

Technology. 1999. 4.

94. Park, J. and Ardell, A. Microstructures of the Commercial 7075 Al Alloy in

the T651 and T7 Tempers. Metallurgical Transactions A. 1983. 14(10): 1957-

1965.