Upload
hua-shao
View
225
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Microstructure and mechanical properties of
MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–TiO2 glass–ceramics
Hua Shao*, Kaiming Liang, Feng Zhou, Guoliang Wang, Anming Hu
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, PR China
Received 9 April 2004; received in revised form 2 November 2004; accepted 24 November 2004
Abstract
Crystallization sequences of MgO–Al2O3–SiO2–TiO2 system glass were investigated by means of DTA,
XRD, SEM and EDS. The mechanical properties of samples, including density, microhardness and elastic
modulus, were characterized as well. The relationship between crystalline phases, heat treatment methods and
mechanical properties is discussed. The results have shown that: the glass first underwent extensive phase
separation into titanium-rich droplets in a silica-rich matrix, then magnesium aluminotitanate (MAT) initially
precipitated in the droplet phase. With the crystallization temperature increased, b-quartzss, sapphirine, a-quartzss,
a-cordierite and cristobalite made their appearance successively. When the glass was heated at 1100 8C for 2 h, the
maximum elastic modulus of 137 GPa (accompanied by a microhardness of 8.5 GPa and a density of 2.924 g/cm3)
was obtained.
# 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
Cordierite (2MgO–2Al2O3–5SiO2) and cordierite-based glass–ceramics have been extensively studied
in various applications including ceramic matrix composites (CMC) [1,2] and substrates for high speed
computers [3,4] mainly due to their beneficial properties, i.e. low thermal expansion coefficient, low
dielectric constant and high chemical durability [5–8]. Generally, the properties of glass–ceramics are
determined by the main crystalline phases and the microstructures depending on composition of the
www.elsevier.com/locate/matresbu
Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506
* Corresponding author. Tel.: +86 106 277 3392; fax: +86 106 277 3392.
E-mail address: [email protected] (H. Shao).
0025-5408/$ – see front matter # 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.materresbull.2004.11.005
parent glass as well and the addition of nucleating agents [9]. So, it is very important to design the
composition of the glasses and control the crystallization of the glass to achieve a homogenous
microstructure. Although the relationship between phase separation, nucleation and crystallization in
this kind of glass ceramics had been widely investigated [10,11], the microstructure-property relationship
during crystallization appear rarely reported.
The aim of the present work is to investigate the crystallization sequences of the MgO–Al2O3–SiO2
system glass containing TiO2 as nucleating agent, and deal with the relationship between crystalline
phases, heat treatment methods and mechanical properties of this glass–ceramics.
2. Experimental procedure
2.1. Preparation of the glass–ceramics
The material investigated was produced by mixtures of the following reagent oxides: MgO
(10–20 wt.%), Al2O3 (15–35 wt.%), SiO2 (20–40 wt.%), TiO2 (5–10 wt.%). Glass batches were ball-
milled for 24 h, and thereafter melted in a platinum crucible at 1500–1600 8C for 3 h. The melts were
poured onto a steel plate, annealed for 1 h at 600 8C, and then cooled to ambient temperature in the
furnace.
2.2. DTA analysis
The resulting glass was crushed and sieved through a 200 mesh to produce glass powder suitable for
DTA analysis employing a Dupont DTA with the temperature range of 20–1200 8C. The glass powder
with the weight of 50 mg was contained in a platinum crucible and the reference material was a-Al2O3
powders. The samples were heated in air from ambient temperature to 1200 8C at the heating rate of
10 K/min.
2.3. X-ray powder diffraction
The amount and types of crystalline phases existing in a sample after heat treatment were determined
by X-ray powder diffraction (D/max-RB) using Cu Ka radiation, working voltage 40 kV, working
current 25 mA, scanning speed of 48 min�1.
2.4. Scanning electron microscope
The bulk specimens after heat-treatment were surface polished with diamond paste to a 0.5 mm finish
and etched in 1% hydrofluoric acid for 30 s (20 8C). Then the microstructural studies on these specimens
were done by scanning electron microscope (6301 F).
2.5. Determination of density, microhardness Hv, and elastic modulus
Density of samples were determined by Archimedes’ immersion method, involving boiling in water
for 2 h and a further soaking of 24 h at ambient temperature.
H. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506500
Vickers microhardness measurements of heat treated glass–ceramic samples were made with a Vickers
microhardness tester (Shimadazu HMV 2000). Specimens were prepared using conventional metallo-
graphic techniques and a load of 500 g were used to indent their surfaces. In order to obtain reliable
statistical data, at least 10 measurements were made on each sample.
Modulus of elasticity was measured by the pulse-echo method with an ultrasonic tester (USIP 12).
3. Results and discussion
3.1. Differential thermal analysis
The differential thermal analysis (DTA) record of sample was shown in Fig. 1. As we can see
from Fig. 1, the glass transition temperature (Tg) of the curve was evidently about 780 8C, two
apparently exothermal peaks (Tp1, Tp2) were observed which associate the formation of various
crystalline phases.
3.2. XRD analysis
The X-ray diffraction patterns of samples isothermally treated at various temperatures are shown in
Fig. 2. The crystallization sequences of the system glass identified by XRD are summarized in Table 1. It
was found that the sample is fully amorphous after heat-treatment at 780 8C for 2 h. The magnesium
aluminotitanate (Mg2Al6Ti7O25, MAT) appears at 900 8C although a significant amount of glassy phase
remained. According to Fig. 2b, at 950 8C, besides the reflections of MAT, reflections belonging to a
small amount of b-quartzss could be detected. As we can see from Fig. 2c, heat treatments over 1100 8Cfor 2 h resulted in the formation of a-cordierite and transformation of b-quartzss to a-quartzss, and a trace
of reflection of sapphirine was detected as well. After heat treatment at 1200 8C for 2 h, the reflections of
b-quartzss and sapphirine disappeared, a-cordierite became the primary phase and the reflections of a-
quartzss, cristobalite and aluminum titanate (Ai2TiO5, AT) could be detected, and the glassy phase
minimized.
H. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506 501
Fig. 1. DTA curve of the glass sample at the heating rate of 10 K/min.
3.3. Microscopic examinations
The extensive phase separation after crystallization at 780 8C for 2 h is shown in Fig. 3a. No
crystalline phase made its appearance confirmed by the result of XRD as shown in Fig. 2a. The results
of EDS shown in Fig. 4 give evidence for the droplets (A area) rich in titanium, while leading the
matrix (B area) rich in silica. SEM micrograph of sample heated at 950 8C for 2 h as shown in Fig. 4b.
The initial MAT made its appearance from the titanium-rich zone heated at 950 8C for 2 h which was
confirmed by the result of XRD as shown in Fig. 2b. The morphology of the samples heated at
1200 8C for 2 h shown in Fig. 3c. The average crystal size is 1 mm and the maximal crystal size is
about 3 mm.
3.4. Mechanical test
The curves of the relationship between of density, Vickers hardness, elastic modulus and crystal-
lization temperatures are shown in Fig. 5. The values of density, r, and elastic modulus, E, of the parent
H. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506502
Fig. 2. XRD patterns of samples at different heat treatment conditions. (a) 780 for 2 h, (b) 950 8C for 2 h, (c) 1100 8C for 2 h, (d)
1200 8C for 2 h.
Table 1
Crystalline phases of samples at various heat treatment conditions
Treatment condition Crystalline phases
780 8C, 2 h Glass
900 8C, 2 h MAT, glass
950 8C, 2 h MAT, b-quartzss, glass
1000 8C, 2 h b-Quartzss, a-quartzss, sapphirine, glass
1100 8C, 2 h a-Cordierite, a-quartzss, sapphirine,
1200 8C, 2 h a-Cordierite, a-quartzss, cristobalite, aluminum titanate
H. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506 503
Fig. 3. SEM micrographs of samples at different heat treatment conditions. (a) 780 8C for 2 h, (b) 950 8C for 2 h, (c) 1200 8Cfor 2 h.
glass without thermal treatment are 2.619 g/cm3 and 98 GPa, respectively. After heat treatment at 900 8Cfor 2 h, the elastic modulus is slightly larger (107 GPa) while the density remains constant. The Vickers
hardness also slightly increases from 6.1 GPa for the glass to 6.9 GPa after thermal treatment at 950 8Cbecause the crystal content is larger with the crystallization temperature increased. Subsequent crystal-
lization at 1000 8C for 2 h leads to a notable increase of density, Vickers hardness and elastic modulus to
2.723 g/cm3, 7.2 and 121 GPa, respectively because a-quartzss precipitated, which has higher density and
hardness (r = 2.65 g/cm3, Moh’s hardness number is 7) than b-quartzss (r = 2.53 g/cm3, Moh’s hardness
number is 6.5–7) [12,13]. Increasing the crystallization temperature to 1100 8C for 2 h, a-cordierite
appeared and b-quartzss transformed to a-quartzss, which results in a further improvement of the
mechanical properties. Here, a density of 2.924 g/cm3 and an elastic modulus as high as 137 GPa is
obtained and the Vickers hardness amounts to 8.5 GPa. Tempering at 1200 8C for 2 h, however, results in
a decrease of Vickers hardness, elastic modulus and density because the cristobalite, aluminum titanate
which have low density and elastic modulus appeared which confirmed by the results of XRD shown in
Fig. 2d [14].
H. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506504
Fig. 4. EDS results of (a) A area and (b) B area in Fig. 3a.
4. Conclusion
1. The glass investigated in this paper first underwent extensive phase separation into titanium-rich
droplets in a silica-rich matrix, then magnesium aluminotitanate (MAT) initially precipitated in the
droplet phase. With the crystallization temperature increased, b-quartzss, sapphirine, a-quartzss, a-
cordierite, cristobalite made their appearance successively.
2. Mechanical properties of this material mainly depend on heat treatment conditions. When the glass is
heated at 1100 8C for 2 h, the maximum elastic modulus of 137 GPa combined with a hardness of
8.5 GPa and a density of 2.924 g/cm3 were obtained.
H. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506 505
Fig. 5. The curves of the relationships between density, Vickers hardness, elastic modulus and crystallization temperatures.
Reference
[1] R. Chaim, V. Talanker, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 78 (1995) 66.
[2] W.E. Lee, W.M. Rainforth, Ceramic Microstructures: Property Control by Processing, Chapman & Hall, London, 1994.
[3] R.R. Tummala, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 74 (1991) 895.
[4] S.H. Knickerbocker, A.H. Kumar, L.W. Herron, Am. Ceram. Soc. Bull. 72 (1993) 90.
[5] A.G. Gregory, T.J. Veasey, J. Mater. Sci. 6 (1971) 1312.
[6] M. Sales, J. Alarcon, J. Mater. Sci. 30 (1995) 2341.
[7] M.A. Mccoy, A.H. Heuer, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 71 (1988) 673.
[8] M. Awano, H. Takas, Y. Kumahara, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 35 (1992) 2535.
[9] A.G. Gregory, T.J. Veasey, J. Mater. Sci. 8 (1973) 324.
[10] Y. Hirose, H. Doi, O. Kamigaito, J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 3 (1984) 153.
[11] P.W. Mcmillan, Glass–ceramics, second ed. Academic Press, London, 1979, 76.
[12] P. Wange, et al. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 298 (2002) 137.
[13] R. Muller, J. Thermal Anal. 35 (1989) 823.
[14] E. Kato, K. Daimon, J. Takahashi, J. Am. Ceram. Sci. 63 (1980) 355.
H. Shao et al. / Materials Research Bulletin 40 (2005) 499–506506