Upload
paloma-dicken
View
219
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Mid- to late- Winter ’13LAs view student thinking as:• Instrumentally valuable• Morally valuable• Intellectually valuable* – sensible
& productive starting place for instruction
*See Robertson’s poster for more info
Development of Novice Teachers’ Views of Student Ideas as Sensible and ProductiveClarissa E. Lovegren and Amy D. Robertson
Seattle Pacific University (SPU) Learning Assistants (LAs) expand their views of student thinking as sensible and productive. We propose that articulating teaching values, searching for kernels of correctness, and intentionally developing curricular knowledge foster these views.
Fall ‘12 to early Winter ’13LAs view student thinking as:• Instrumentally valuable – useful
for teaching & learning goals • Morally valuable – significant to
student’s personhood
SPU Learning Assistant Experience
Methodology1. Reviewed LAs’ reflections that
intellectually value student ideas2. Looked for connections between
LAs’ values and aspects of the LA program
3. Analyzed how and why plausible mechanisms fostered shift
Significance of Research1. Promotes LAs’ careful consideration of
what student reasoning has to offer: Intrinsic sensibility Productivity
2. Shows what it looks like to act on views of student thinking as sensible & productive
3. Suggests how such views might be developed elsewhere
LAs articulate teaching values- Winter ‘13, LAs debate: okay to
leave students with wrong answer?- LA David says:“[M]y interaction [Fall] quarter was mainly me talking, asking leading questions and
trying to direct student thinking in the way that I wanted it to go. How close minded of me! Those unique student ideas, even when incorrect, can provide so much insight, and
usually offer a strong starting point on which to instruct that particular material…
In our class discussions, we have talked about the...idea that student reasoning and
understanding can be held in the highest priority, while simultaneously ensuring that
the students walk away with correct answers.”
LAs developcurricular knowledge - Fall ‘12-Winter ‘13, LAs
pedagogically dissect Tutorials- Look for ways Tutorials:
• Address common student difficulties
• Build models- LA Sarah explains:
“Understanding the instructional strategies used by the tutorial has definitely [a]ffected my teaching
because now I am less focused on the students knowing the exact answer
because I feel it is more important for them to understand their thinking.”
Pedagogy
Content PreparationPractice
Articulating Teaching Values
Searching for Kernels of Correctness
Developing Curricular Knowledge
Mechanisms that Fostered the Shift
SPU LAs Novice Teachers
LAs search for “kernels of correctness”- LA course instructor challenges LAs to
‘try on’ student ideas- LA Jess writes:"…In one part of the tutorial it asks the students
to compare tensions in 2 springs of different linear mass densities…one student[…]said that
Spring 1 had a greater tension because the wave speed was faster and that’s what we saw in the first page. She also said that the spring
just seemed tenser…This is true in the sense of how people feel tension…but this didn’t
necessarily fall in line with the physics definition of tension…In this situation I really understood
where she went wrong and just how it was easy to believe what she believed. I believe I learned how to analyze how students argue the[ir] point
and find the kernel of truth in it and make it flourish from that."
Participates in class discussion
Views of student ideas changed
“Strong starting point on which to instruct”
Seeks out “kernels”
Analyzes and understands student idea
“Believable” idea that can “flourish”
Expands curricular knowledge
Alters teaching focus
“Understand their thinking” valued over the
exact answer
Value of “Intellectually Valuing”
“Intellectually Valuing”
Promotes conceptual
learning
Treats students as capable &
intelligentAligns with
constructivism