Midvale City 7505 South Holden Street ... · Chief Mason introduced Detective Archuleta who has put together a program for the high school regarding texting and driving. She said

_______ Midvale City

7505 South Holden Street Midvale, UT 84047

801-567-7200 www.midvalecity.org

________________________________________________________________

MIDVALE CITY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA

May 03, 2016 PUBLIC NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Midvale City Council will hold a regular meeting on the 3rd Day of May, 2016 at Midvale City Hall, 7505 South Holden Street, Midvale, Utah as follows: 6:30 PM INFORMATIONAL ITEMS I. DEPARTMENT REPORTS II. CITY MANAGER BUSINESS 7:00 PM REGULAR MEETING III. GENERAL BUSINESS

A. WELCOME AND PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE B. ROLL CALL C. Proclamation - Kids to Parks Day

IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS Any person wishing to comment on any item not otherwise on the Agenda may address the City Council at this point by stepping to the microphone and giving his or her name for the record. Comments should be limited to not more than three (3) minutes, unless additional time is authorized by the Governing Body. Citizen groups will be asked to appoint a spokesperson. This is the time and place for any person who wishes to comment on non-hearing, non-Agenda items. Items brought forward to the attention of the City Council will be turned over to staff to provide a response outside of the City Council meeting. V. COUNCIL REPORTS

A. Councilmember Paul Glover B. Councilmember Paul Hunt C. Councilmember Quinn Sperry D. Councilmember Wayne Sharp E. Councilmember Stephen Brown

VI. MAYOR REPORT

A. Mayor JoAnn B. Seghini VII. CONSENT AGENDA

A. Approve minutes of April 19 & 26, 2016 [Rori Andreason, H.R. Director/City Recorder]

B. Set date and time (May 17, 2016 at 7:00 p.m.) White Pines Phase VIII located at 189-193 East 8000 South.; General Plan Amendment from Low Density Residential to Medium Density

http://www.midvalecity.org/

City Council Meeting May 03, 2016 Page 2

Residential and Rezone from Single Family Residential (SF-1) with Agricultural Overlay to Multi Family Residential (RM-12) [Lesley Burns, City Planner]

C. Set date and time (May 17, 2016 at 7:00 p.m.) Fry Rezone located at 193 West 8600 South.;

Rezone from Regional Commercial to Single Family Residential (SF-1) [Lesley Burns, City Planner]

VIII. ACTION ITEMS

A. Approve Resolution No. 2016-R-16 Declaring Surplus Property [David Starkey, Senior Accountant]

B. Approve Resolution No. 2016-R-15 Adopting the Midvale City Tentative Budget for the Fiscal

Year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017 [Kane Loader, City Manager; Laurie Harvey, Asst. City Manager/Admin Services Director]

C. Approve Ordinance No. 2016-O-04, a Text Amendment to eliminate the mixed-use requirement for

buildings over five stories in the State Street Commercial and TOD zones [Lesley Burns, City Planner]

IX. DISCUSSION ITEMS

A. Discuss the proposed Administration Budget for Utopia, Council, General Administration, Legal, Public Safety, Intergovernmental, and Harvest Days. [Kane Loader, City Manager]

B. Discuss White Pines Phase VIII located at 189-193 East 8000 South.; General Plan Amendment

from Low Density Residential to Medium Density Residential and Rezone from Single Family Residential (SF-1) with Agricultural Overlay to Multi Family Residential (RM-12) [Lesley Burns, City Planner]

C. Discuss Fry Rezone located at 193 West 8600 South.; Rezone from Regional Commercial to Single

Family Residential (SF-1) [Lesley Burns, City Planner] X. CLOSED SESSION TO DISCUSS THE CHARACTER, PROFESSIONAL COMPETENCE OR

PHYSICAL OR MENTAL HEALTH OF AN INDIVIDUAL XI. ADJOURN XII. CALENDAR OF EVENTS

A. April 27 - Planning Commission Meeting B. May 3 - Regular City Council Meeting C. May 4 - Community Council Meeting D. May 6 & 7 - Cinco De Mayo E. May 10 - Council Workshop Meeting F. May 11 - Planning Commission Meeting G. May 17 - Regular City Council Meeting H. May 19 - Legal Clinic I. May 25 - Planning Commission Meeting J. May 30 - Memorial Day

In accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act, Midvale City will make reasonable accommodations for participation in the meeting. Request assistance by contacting the City Recorder at 801-567-7207, providing at least three

City Council Meeting May 03, 2016 Page 3 working days advance notice of the meeting. TTY 711 A copy of the foregoing agenda was provided to the news media by email and/or fax; the agenda was posted in the City Hall Lobby, the 2nd Floor City Hall Lobby, on the City’s website at www.midvalecity.org and the State Public Notice Website at http://pmn.utah.gov. Council Members may participate in the meeting via electronic communications. Council Members’ participation via electronic communication will be broadcast and amplified so other Council Members and all other persons present in the Council Chambers will be able to hear or see the communication.

PLEASE MAKE SURE ALL CELL PHONES ARE TURNED OFF DURING THE MEETING DATE POSTED: APRIL 29, 2016

RORI L. ANDREASON, MMC H.R. DIRECTOR/CITY RECORDER

http://www.midvalecity.org/

http://pmn.utah.gov/

CITY COUNCIL MEETING

Minutes

Tuesday, April 19, 2016 Council Chambers

7505 South Holden Street Midvale, Utah 84047

MAYOR: Mayor JoAnn B. Seghini COUNCIL MEMBERS: Council Member Wayne Sharp Council Member Stephen Brown Council Member Paul Glover Council Member Paul Hunt Council Member Quinn Sperry STAFF: Kane Loader, City Manager; Phillip Hill, Assistant City Manager/Community

Development Director; Rori Andreason, H.R. Director/City Recorder; Lisa Garner, City Attorney; Bob Davis, Public Works Director; Chief Tony Mason, UPD Midvale Precinct; Chief Scott McBride, UFA; Lesley Burns, City Planner; Matt Hilderman, Associate Planner; Christopher Butte, Economic Development Director; and Jarin Blackham, IT Manager.

Mayor Seghini called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m. I. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS

A. DEPARTMENT REPORTS

Chief Mason introduced Officer Chavez who is dedicated to the Homeless Shelter. He has been there for two weeks and is loved by all. Officer Chavez said there is no one standing in the road anymore and enforcing the pan handling regulations. Chief Mason said Officer Chavez is also working with the Head Start Program. Chief Mason introduced Detective Archuleta who has put together a program for the high school regarding texting and driving. She said they are cracking down on distracted driving. She has been tasked with educating the students at Hillcrest High School. She previewed a video she had put together. Chief Mason said the COP officers were out of town so they will attend the next meeting. Chief McBride reminded the Council about Fire School on May 6th. Council Member Wayne Sharp asked if a report is being kept regarding calls at the Homeless Shelter. Kane Loader said those calls are being tracked. Phillip Hill discussed the South Allen Street CDBG project. He updated the Council on the status of the splash pad, which is still waiting on the Health Department approval. He said the City finally received the funding from Salt Lake County for the 7200 South corridor.

Proceedings of the Midvale City Council Meeting April 19, 2016

Page 2

Bob Davis updated the Council on several city projects as well as the bulky waste cleanup. He discussed the Station Place Condominium storm drain problem. He said they are moving ahead with a resolution to this issue. II. CITY MANAGER’S REPORT Kane Loader said TransJordan Landfill is changing managers. Dwayne Woolley, Executive Director; and Craig Jorgensen, Operations Superintendent; are both retiring from the Landfill. They will have a send-off celebration on Thursday, April 28th from 3:30 to 6:30 p.m. at West Jordan City Hall. Mark Hooyer is the new Executive Director. They also hired Jarin Scott who will be the Landfill Manager replacing Craig Jorgensen. He said several meetings have been held regarding the homeless issue. The Fire, Police, and Code Enforcement will be included in monthly meetings with the Homeless Shelter. These meetings will be open to all businesses and the City Council. Kane Loader discussed street trees and planting them in the park strips. Council Member Wayne Sharp said he does not want any street trees within the park strip. If you take out a tree in the park strip and give the residents another tree, they will plant it in the park strip again just like what happened on Grant Street. Kane Loader said he would like to schedule is item for discussion at a workshop. III. GENERAL BUSINESS

A. Welcome and Pledge of Allegiance

B. Roll Call – Council Members Stephen Brown, Paul Hunt, Wayne Sharp, Quinn Sperry, and Paul Glover were present at roll call. C. Presentation from ULGT on TAP Award Doug Folsom, ULGT, was present to give the City the Trust Accountability Program Award. The ULGT has about 500 different members throughout the State of Utah. The TAP award ends up being awarded to the elite membership. Only 75 members completed the program this year. He said Midvale has been doing a very good job. He said he appreciates the City Council and staff for their dedication. In receiving this award it saves the city money on the workers comp premium as well as a refund on our premiums. Mayor Seghini expressed her appreciation for the Utah Local Governments Trust and what they do for the City. Kane Loader thanked Rori Andreason for her hard work on the TAP award as well the Public Works Department. IV. PUBLIC COMMENTS Ron Sperry invited the Council to a lunch meeting at the Jordan Valley Water Conservancy District. Lauren Davison said she lives in a neighborhood by Winco and since the Canyon Crossing apartments have opened, they have had a large increase in theft, vandalism, etc. There is a pathway that attaches the apartments with their neighborhood. They have attempted talking with the kids as well as called the police a few times but it doesn’t seem to help. She said they would like to block off the pathway to increase the safety of the neighborhood. She said they have a petition with 60 signatures which represent 33% of the homes that are finished.


Page 3

Lesley Burns stated that the pathway was originally installed to connect the neighborhoods and allow for residents to get to areas of the commercial development without having to walk around the streets. Councilmember Paul Glover asked what the neighborhood needed to do from here to get this issue looked at? Phillip Hill said they just have to present the petition and the Council can look at this issue. The Council said they would like this issue scheduled for a workshop meeting. Lauren Davison presented the petition to the Council. Kane Loader suggested holding a neighborhood meeting to discuss this issue. Emily Fielding said she has lived in East Riverwalk for two years. They had no problem with vandalism until the path opened. She said they are financially responsible for the pathway, which doesn’t seem fair to them especially when they would like it blocked off. There are a lot of transients using the pathway to get to the Jordan River. She said they don’t have enough fencing or lighting in the area. Rhett Olton expressed his frustration with the pathway and that it has brought nothing but trouble to their neighborhood. Floyd Tarbet asked how the Community Council should be involved with this issue. Mayor Seghini suggested attending the neighborhood meeting and let them know the community council exists. Sophia Hawes-Tingey said she is the secretary for the community council. She would like to reiterate that the community council is looking for more active participants and would really like a representative from their area. Melvin Nimer said the path has no lights; it is a very dark area. Councilmember Paul Glover also suggested maybe looking at some low voltage lighting for the pathway. He said the Council will contact Ms. Davison about a date and time for the neighborhood meeting. V. COUNCIL REPORTS A. Councilmember Stephen Brown – had nothing to report.

B. Councilmember Paul Glover – said he received a complaint from a resident living next to the Center Square development who indicated the developer is allowing trucks to idle there for a very long period of time. He asked if the developer would idle the trucks elsewhere instead of next to the neighborhood.

C Councilmember Paul Hunt – had nothing to report. D. Councilmember Quinn Sperry – had nothing to report.


Page 4

E. Councilmember Wayne Sharp – had nothing to report.

VI. MAYOR REPORT Mayor JoAnn B. Seghini – had nothing to report. MOTION: Councilmember Paul Glover MOVED to open a public hearing. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Stephen Brown. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none she called for a vote. The motion passed unanimously. VII. PUBLIC HEARING(S) – 7:00 PM A. CONSIDER A TEXT AMENDMENT TO MODIFY BUILDING HEIGHTS AND SETBACKS IN THE RM-12, RM-25, STATE STREET COMMERCIAL, AND TOD ZONES Lesley Burns said there have been discussions with both the City Council and Planning Commission in the last few months to address recent community concerns regarding building heights and setbacks in areas immediately adjacent to single family residential zones. Of particular concern is the potential for five story buildings to be developed near single family residential neighborhoods. After reviewing the development standards in the RM-12, RM-25, State Street Commercial (SSC) and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) zones, which are directly adjacent to single family residential zones, it was found that each of the zones has different buffering and height requirements for new multi-family and commercial buildings. The attached tables summarize the allowable building heights and required setbacks currently in the ordinance. Looking to balance the need to provide appropriate areas for growth and new development to occur while protecting adjacent, stable residential neighborhoods from the impacts of more intense development, Staff proposed the following concepts be implemented into the zoning ordinance text in the RM-12, RM-25, SSC and TOD zones regarding building heights and setbacks.

• Utilizing the concept currently included in the TOD zone that larger setbacks from single family residential zones are required as building heights increase, make the setbacks for various buildings heights the same in all four zones.

• Include the 15 foot residential landscape buffer requirement (to include 6 foot masonry wall, large trees and shrubs) currently in the TOD zone, in the other three zones.

• Unless projects have frontage on State Street or 7200 South, limit building heights to 4 stories with a 66 foot setback from single family residential zones.

• Projects with frontage on State Street or 7200 South would have the ability to go up to 6 and 7 stories if the building is a mixed-use structure and up to 5 stories if the building is commercial or mixed-use (graduated setbacks from adjacent single 2 family residential zones still required). The maximum building height for multifamily buildings would be 4 stories.

• Modifying the current definitions for “mixed-use” to avoid confusion. This was presented to the Planning Commission at a public hearing held on March 9, 2016. After receiving public input, the Planning Commission had a lengthy discussion and requested some information on what other cities in the area are doing. The Planning Commission also formulated a number of questions to consider at its next meeting. These included, but were not limited to, the following. These questions are key components of the City’s


Page 5

General Plan Update, currently underway, which is intended to guide the City in its land development decisions to ensure these decisions are working towards achieving the overall goals of the City.

• How does the proposed text amendment fit within the current General Plan Update process?

• Are the concerns we are trying to address with the proposed text amendment community-wide concerns or the reaction to an isolated issue?

• What implications does the proposed text amendment have on future growth and opportunities to provide sustainable services to the City’s residents?

• Is the “one size fits all” approach the best solution or do we need to consider different development requirements in different areas?

Planning Commission Recommendation After another lengthy discussion on March 23, 2016, the Planning Commission forwarded the following recommendation to the City Council: “I move that we forward a recommendation to the City Council to make no changes to the ordinance with regard to building heights and setbacks in the RM-12. RM-25, SSC and TOD zones until a more comprehensive review of all of the issues can be done that is based on the considerations and goals of the General Plan Update. It is our hope that these changes can be made immediately upon the approval of the General Plan update. The Commission further expresses to the City Council the sense of the Commission that the City needs to promote higher density commercial and residential projects in the TOD and SSC zones. It is the hope of the Commission that this will be reflected in the updates to the General Plan.” City Council Discussion – April 5, 2016 During the discussion on April 5, 2016, the City Council requested Staff put together alternative language to Attachment A that would not require buildings to be mixed use or commercial in order to be 5, 6 or 7 stories. This also requires a modification to the definition for “mixed-use”. Attachment B includes this alternative. All other components of the original proposal would remain, including setbacks from residential zones. If the City Council decides to adopt the text amendments in either Attachment A or Attachment B, Staff has prepared an ordinance, Ordinance No. 2016-O-04. In adopting this ordinance, the City Council will need to decide whether to include Attachment A (requiring 5 story structures to be commercial or mixed use and requiring 6 and 7 story structures to be mixed use) or Attachment B (allowing 5, 6 and 7 story structures to be residential, commercial or a mix). STAFF RECOMMENDATION: The City Council has a number of options in addressing this item: 1. Follow the Planning Commission’s recommendation making no changes to the current ordinance with regard to building heights and setbacks in the RM-12. RM- 25, SSC and TOD zones until a more comprehensive review of all of the issues can be done that is based on the considerations and goals of the General Plan Update. 2. Adopt proposed Ordinance No. 2016-O-04 with Attachment A which provides for the following:


Page 6

• Utilize the development standards currently in the TOD zone requiring larger setbacks from single family residential zones as building heights increase in the RM-12, RM-25 and SSC zones.

• Require the 15 foot residential landscape buffer standard (to include 6 foot masonry wall, large trees and shrubs) currently in the TOD zone, in the RM-12, RM-25 and SSC zones.


• Allow projects with frontage on State Street or 7200 South to go up to 6 and 7 stories if the building is a mixed-use structure and up to 5 stories if the building is a commercial or mixed-use structure. The maximum building height for multi-family buildings is 4 stories.

3. Adopt proposed Ordinance No. 2016-O-04 with Attachment B which provides for the following:

• Utilize the development standards currently in the TOD zone requiring larger setbacks from single family residential zones as building heights increase in the RM-12, RM-25 and SSC zones.

• Require the 15 foot residential landscape buffer standard (to include 6 foot masonry wall, large trees and shrubs) currently in the TOD zone, in the RM-12, RM-25 and SSC zones.


• Allow projects with frontage on State Street or 7200 South to go up to 7 stories regardless of use, i.e. remove mixed-use requirement for 6 and 7 story buildings.

4. Request Staff to put together different ordinance language for consideration at the next meeting. Staff recommends the City Council conducts a public hearing, considers the comments received as well as the information provided, and makes one of the following motions. Mayor Seghini opened the public hearing to public comment. John McDonald, said he has property at 7300 South Cottonwood Drive, and has been waiting patiently to see what happens. He discussed impact this decision could have on developers and the viability of commercial development. He also said he can only wait so long before he needs to go a different direction. Melvin Nimer asked if the moratorium had ended. Phillip Hill said legally the moratorium ended in March. An application can be made but won’t go into effect until the ordinance is finished, which will indicate what the developer would be bound to. Hooper Knowlton, Partner in Parleys Partners, said he does not have a dog in this fight. He owns the several properties within the City with options to purchase more property. He said he brought before the design review committee a site plan and layout which complies with the ordinance. He closed on that property 15 days prior to the moratorium was put into place. He indicated that he had read every set of minutes of the City Council and Planning Commission for the past two years. He expressed his appreciation for the intelligent Planning Commission


Page 7

members of the City. He felt it was prudent to complete the General Plan before making a decision on this issue. MOTION: Councilmember Wayne Sharp MOVED to close the public hearing. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Paul Glover. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none she called for a vote. The motion passed unanimously. ACTION: APPROVE ORDINANCE NO. 2016-O-04 , A TEXT AMENDMENT TO MODIFY BUILDING HEIGHTS AND SETBACKS IN THE RM-12, RM 25, STATE STREET COMMERCIAL, AND TOD ZONES Councilmember Quinn Sperry expressed concern that the Council was reacting to one bad incident regarding a development next to a neighborhood and should wait to make a decision that is good for the entire City. He felt the General Plan Update should be completed prior to taking any action on this issue. MOTION: Councilmember Quinn Sperry MOVED that we make no changes to the ordinance with the exception of removing the mixed use requirement and leave all of the other requirements the same in the RM-12. RM-25, SSC and TOD zones until a more comprehensive review of all of the issues can be done that is based on the considerations and goals of the General Plan Update. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Paul Hunt. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none, she called for a roll call vote. The voting was as follows: Council member Stephen Brown Nay Council member Paul Glover Nay Council member Paul Hunt Aye Councilmember Wayne Sharp Nay Council member Quinn Sperry Aye The motion failed 3-2 against. MOTION: Councilmember Stephen Brown MOVED that we adopt Ordinance No. 2016- O-04 with Attachment B with the following change being made to Section 17- 7-8.4C and Section 17-7-8.5D: The maximum height is 7 stories. Buildings of 5, 6, and 7 stories are limited to State Street and 7200 South “or in the area bounded by Catalpa, Millenium and 300 West, the maximum height is 5 stories.” The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Paul Glover. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. MOTION: Councilmember Wayne Sharp MOVED to allow Christopher Butte to speak to this issue. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Paul Glover. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none she called for a vote. The motion passed unanimously. Christopher Butte expressed his concern with the Council changing the ordinance prior to the completion of the General Plan Update. He said it is unrealistic that any 6 or 7 story buildings


Page 8

would be built in the State Street area. He agreed with the Planning Commission’s recommendation of waiting to make a decision until after completion of the General Plan update. MOTION: Councilmember Wayne Sharp MOVED to close the hearing to public comment. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Stephen Brown. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none she called for a vote. The motion passed unanimously. PREVIOUS MOTION CONTINUED: Mayor Seghini called for a roll call vote on the motion. The voting was as follows: Council member Stephen Brown Aye Council member Paul Glover Aye Council member Paul Hunt Nay Councilmember Wayne Sharp Nay Council member Quinn Sperry Nay The motion failed 3-2 against. MOTION: Councilmember Wayne Sharp MOVED the previous motion made by Councilmember Quinn Sperry that we make no changes to the ordinance with the exception of removing the mixed use requirement and leave all of the other requirements the same in the RM-12. RM-25, SSC and TOD zones until a more comprehensive review of all of the issues can be done that is based on the considerations and goals of the General Plan Update. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Paul Hunt. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none, she called for a roll call vote. The voting was as follows: Council member Stephen Brown Nay Council member Paul Glover Nay Council member Paul Hunt Aye Councilmember Wayne Sharp Aye Council member Quinn Sperry Aye The motion passed 3-2 in favor. Phillip Hill said there wasn’t an ordinance before the Council that night to do what the motion indicated so staff will prepare one and bring it back for official approval at the next regular meeting. Until that time, staff will abide by the motion made and will move in that direction. VIII. CONSENT AGENDA A. APPROVE MINUTES OF MARCH 16, APRIL 5 & 12, 2016

MOTION: Councilmember Paul Hunt MOVED to approve the consent agenda. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Quinn Sperry. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none the she called for a roll call vote. The voting was as follows:

Council member Stephen Brown Aye Council member Paul Glover Aye Council member Paul Hunt Aye Councilmember Wayne Sharp Aye Council member Quinn Sperry Aye


Page 9

The motion passed unanimously.

IX. ACTION A. APPROVE RESOLUTION NO. 2016-R-14 AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR TO ENTER INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH SALT LAKE COUNTY FOR THE USE OF THE SENIOR CENTER Kane Loader said in April of 2016 Midvale City and Salt Lake County entered into an Interlocal agreement to construct and operate a new Senior Center. Since the new center has been completed and in operation the City and County have had discussions regarding the afterhours use of the facility by the community. We have worked out the details and terms of how the facility can be used and all that is needed is to amend the existing Interlocal agreement. I have included the amendment and the term sheet that was developed for the amendment. The City Attorney has reviewed and signed off on the amendment. FISCAL IMPACT: Six month trial period will not exceed $3,100 MOTION: Councilmember Paul Hunt MOVED to adopt Resolution No. 2016-R-14, a resolution approving the First Amendment to the Interlocal Cooperation Agreement between Salt Lake County and Midvale City for the Construction and Operation of a Senior Center and authorize the Mayor to sign the amendment in behalf of the City. The motion was SECONDED by Councilmember Paul Glover. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none the she called for a roll call vote. The voting was as follows: Council member Stephen Brown Aye Council member Paul Glover Aye Council member Paul Hunt Aye Councilmember Wayne Sharp Aye Council member Quinn Sperry Aye The motion passed unanimously. X. ADJOURN

MOTION: Councilmember Wayne Sharp MOVED to adjourn the meeting.

Councilmember Paul Hunt SECONDED the motion. Mayor Seghini called for discussion on the motion. There being none, she called for a vote. The motion passed unanimously.

The meeting adjourned at 9:11 p.m. Rori L. Andreason, MMC H.R. DIRECTOR/CITY RECORDER Approved this 3rd day of May, 2016.

MIDVALE CITY

CITY COUNCILWORKSHOP MEETING Minutes

Tuesday, April 26, 2016

Council Chambers 7505 S. Holden Street Midvale, Utah 84047

MAYOR: JoAnn Seghini COUNCIL MEMBERS: Council Member Wayne Sharp Council Member Stephen Brown Council Member Paul Glover Council Member Paul Hunt Council Member Quinn Sperry STAFF: Kane Loader, City Manager; Phillip Hill, Asst. City Manager/CD Director; Laurie

Harvey, Asst. City Manager/Admin. Services Director; Rori Andreason, H.R. Director/City Recorder; Bob Davis Public Works Director; Danny Walz, Redevelopment Agency Director; Dalin Hackett, Asst. Finance Director/City Treasurer; Lisa Garner, City Attorney; Christopher Butte; Economic Development Director; and Mike Welling, IT Technician.

Mayor Seghini called the meeting to order at 6:30 p.m.

I. DISCUSSION ITEMS A. DISCUSS FY2017 CITY MANAGEMENT BUDGET RECOMMENDATION Laurie Harvey discussed the proposed Midvale City FY2017 Tentative Budget as follows: General Fund • Total Revenues with 150% property tax increase $17.6 million Ongoing = $17.1 million One-time = $500,000

• Total Expenditures

$17.3 million Ongoing = $16.4 One-time = $900,000

• Unappropriated $300,000

Property Tax Increase • 150% increase = $1,478,000 new revenue • Allows Fund Balance to remain at 16.5% 21% including Fleet Fund balance allocated to GF accounts

Proceedings of the Midvale City Council Workshop Meeting April 26, 2016

Page 2

• Options Recommended – permanent rate increase Available – 100% tax increase + G.O. debt assessment of approx. $400,000 G.O. debt assessment available through FY 2020 • Last increase was in FY 2010 Property Tax Increase • Impact of 150% increase on Midvale City taxpayer $200,000 home - $101 $500,000 Business - $457 • Combined property tax for “City” services including Unified Fire Service Area

$200,000 home FY 2016 tax burden - $287 FY 2017 tax burden - $388 Tax increase = 35% Advertised tax increase would be 100%

FY 2017 Budget Increases • Merit/Selective Salary Adjustments $161,400 • Health Insurance Benefit 57,100 • Full-time Mayor 68,000 • Public defender enhancement 25,000 • Continuation of warrants program 60,800 • Office 365 20,000 • New server (SAN) 27,000 • Grant writer 30,000 • Assistance to 501C3 organizations 60,000 • Vehicle for new Facilities Manager 16,000 The Council discussed the proposed change in medical insurance moving to United Healthcare from Select Health saving the City money in premiums. The funding of the high deductible was also discussed. The Council directed staff to look at funding 90% of the high deductible and lowering the City’s percentage of the premium paid on the traditional plan. They asked staff to bring back a cost comparison to make sure it is benefiting the City. The Council also discussed implementing a plan for new hires to have their high deductible funded at a percentage for the first three years or so. FY 2017 Budget Increases • UPD contract increase 242,800 • Animal Control contract increase 20,800 • Additional FTE-Parks 79,600 • In-State ICSC conference 10,000 • Code Enforcement hearing officer 6,000 • Court A/V system 5,000


Page 3

• IT Consultant 5,000 • Caselle Connect Upgrade 4,800 • Aerial photos 2,500 • Card access PW 2,000 FY 2017 Budget Increases • Senior Center attendant 7,200 • Float rebuild 8,000 • Capital projects: • Pavement Management 230,000 • Demolition of old City Hall 50,000 • Cemetery expansion 50,000 • Pickleball Court (1) 30,000 • 50/50 sidewalk program 20,000 • Total operating and capital 1,299.000 Unfunded Requests • FTE-GIS specialist (net of contract) 33,000 • PTE-Senior van driver 13,900 • FTE-Streets operator 52,600 • Overtime-parks and streets 5,500 • PTE-Public Works administration 10,400 • Repay RDA advance* 300,000 • Housing contribution RDA 100,000 Capital projects:

• Pickleball Court (1) 30,000 • Amphitheater remodel (50% match) 300,000 • Park storage building 100,000 • Park restrooms remodel 75,000 • Total operating and capital 1,020,400

Discussion Points • Property Tax increase – The Council agreed to assess the GO Bond and a property tax

increase at 100% • Harvest Days budget – Council said not to increase the budget. Leave it at the amount that

was used last year at approximately $40,000 • Increase pavement management budget – The Council agreed to add funding to the pavement

management program. • Repayment of RDA advance – Kane Loader discussed designing a gateway to the City. FY2017 CIP • Pavement management 800,000 • Shelter road improvements 500,000 • Curb/gutter replacement 50,000 • Sidewalk replacement 50,000


Page 4

• Cemetery expansion 50,000 • Pickleball court 30,000 • 50/50 sidewalk program 20,000 • Demolition of old buildings 50,000 Total 1,550,000 FY2017 CIP Revenues • General fund contributions (B&C) 800,000 • General fund contributions (other) 750,000 Total 1,550,000 B. DISCUSS RATE OPTION FOR WATER, SEWER, AND STORM DRAIN Dalin Hackett discussed the water, sewer and storm drain costs and budget requests. He reviewed the following reasons to eliminate consumption allowance:

• Considered more equitable because the customer is only charged for water consumed • Encourages conservation • Many of the surrounding cities do not include a consumption allowance in the base rate.

He reviewed proposed rates for the next six years. Staff and Council discussed this issue at length.

Mr. Hackett reviewed changes to the sewer fund and the need for an increase of 13.5%. Councilmember Paul Glover requested staff bring back an analysis of the total costs for a homeowner with a $200,000 home in regards to what the total increase will be based on using 4000 gallons of water. The meeting adjourned at 8:33 p.m. II. ADJOURN Rori L. Andreason, MMC CITY RECORDER Approved this 3rd day of May, 2016

MIDVALE CITY COUNCIL SUMMARY REPORT

Meeting Date: May 3, 2016

SUBJECT: Midvale City Corporation Resolution No. 2016-R-16

Declaration of Surplus Property SUBMITTED BY: Dave Starkey, Senior Accountant SUMMARY: Staff proposes that the Council declare the 2007 Senior Citizen van “surplus property”. The van is scheduled to be replaced during the current fiscal year. Trans Jordan Landfill has expressed interest in purchasing the van and we have informed them of our estimate of the fair market value. If we cannot reach an agreement on the sales price with Trans Jordan, the van will be listed on a public surplus website. FISCAL IMPACT: The fair market value of the van is estimated at $20,000. The revenue from the sale of the asset will be posted to the Fleet Fund. STAFF RECOMMENDATION (MOTION READY): I move we adopt Resolution 2016-R-16, declaring the van listed on Attachment ‘A’ as surplus property, and releasing said property for disposal. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution and list of proposed surplus property.

MIDVALE CITY, UTAH

RESOLUTION NO. 2016-R-16

A RESOLUTION DECLARING SURPLUS PROPERTY

WHEREAS, Midvale Municipal Code Section 2.56.100 provides for the surplus and disposal of City property with the consent of the City Council; and WHEREAS, the Council desires to declare surplus a van as described in Attachment ‘A’; and

WHEREAS, the Council feels the surplus and disposal of said property would be in the best interest of the City.

NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED, that based on the foregoing, the Midvale City Council declares the vehicles and miscellaneous equipment, as described in Attachment ‘A’, as surplus and releases said property for disposal.

APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 3rd day of May, 2016

_____________________________________________ JoAnn B. Seghini, Mayor ATTEST: Voting by the Council: “Aye” “Nay” Stephen Brown ____ ____ Wayne Sharp ____ ____ Quinn Sperry ____ ____ Paul Hunt ____ ____ Paul Glover ____ ____ _______________________________ Rori L. Andreason, MMC City Recorder

ATTACHMENT ‘A’

FY 2016 SURPLUS VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT – May 2016

Asset # Type Year Description Est. Market Value

501 Van/Bus 2007 Ford E450 Van Bus 20,000


Meeting Date: May 3, 2016

SUBJECT: Action approving Resolution No. 2016-R-15, a resolution adopting the Fiscal Year 2017 Tentative Operating and Capital Budgets SUBMITTED BY: Kane Loader, City Manager Laurie Harvey, Assist. City Manager/Admin. Services Dir. SUMMARY: As we go through the process of adopting the FY 2017 budgets there are several procedural steps that you as the City Council are required to take in order to be compliant with state statute.

1 UCA 10-6-111(1) requires the Budget Officer to present a tentative budget for each fund within the city. The budgets must be submitted not later than the first regularly scheduled meeting in May. We will present budgets for the General Fund, Public Utility Fund, Sanitation Fund, Internal Service Funds, Capital Improvement Fund, Telecommunications Fund, Street Lighting Fund and Storm Water Utility Fund on Tuesday, May 3rd. At that time we will brief you on the revised revenue estimates, provide a brief overview of the expenditures, and present budget highlights along with any proposed program changes.

2. UCA 10-6-111(3) further requires the City Council to adopt the tentative budget

at this meeting. The Council will then review and amend, if necessary, the budgets prior to their final adoption. During the next several weeks we will begin discussing in detail with the Council each department budget. We will be following the schedule that has been outlined on the budget calendar.

3. As a reminder, the purpose of a tentative budget is to have a working tool from

which we can start the formal adoption process. The budget document can be changed, updated and amended any time prior to final adoption in June. At the time of final adoption, all of the City’s budgets must be balanced, meaning that expenditures must be equal to revenues.

FISCAL IMPACT: The tentative budget provides a starting point for discussion of the budget for Fiscal Year 2017 prior to final approval.

RECOMMENDED MOTION: I move that we adopt Resolution No. 2016-R-15, a resolution adopting the Midvale City Tentative Operating and Capital Budgets for Fiscal Year 2017. ATTACHMENTS: Resolution No. 2016-R-15. The FY 2017 Tentative Budget will be presented at the meeting on May 3rd.

RESOLUTION NO. 2016-R-15 A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE TENTATIVE OPERATING AND CAPITAL BUDGETS FOR MIDVALE CITY, STATE OF UTAH, FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 2017. WHEREAS, State law requires the filing of a tentative budget for each municipality located within the State of Utah; and

WHEREAS, the tentative budget complies with the requirements set out in U.A.C. § 10-6-111; and WHEREAS, the budget shall be reviewed, considered, and tentatively adopted by the governing body and may be amended or revised in such manner as is considered advisable prior to public hearings. NOW, THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MIDVALE CITY, STATE OF UTAH, as follows: SECTION ONE: That Midvale City, a municipal corporation, hereby adopts the following tentative budgets for the fiscal year beginning July 1, 2016 and ending June 30, 2017:

1. General Fund, Section 10-6-109, UCA

2. Capital Projects Fund, Section 10-6-109, UCA

3. Public Utilities Fund, Section 10-6-135, UCA

4. Storm Water Utility Fund, Section 10-6-135, UCA

5. Sanitation Fund, Section 10-6-135, UCA

6. Telecommunications Fund 10-6-135, UCA

7. Street Light Utility Fund 10-6-135, UCA

8. Fleet Management Fund, Section 10-6-135, UCA

9. Information Technology Fund, Section 10-6-135,UCA

SECTION TWO: That this Resolution shall become effective immediately upon the passage thereof.

PASSED AND ADOPTED BY THE CITY COUNCIL OF MIDVALE CITY, STATE OF UTAH, this 3rd day of May, 2016.

________________________________ JoAnn B. Seghini, Mayor

BUDGET OFFICER CERTIFICATION:

_______________________________ Kane Loader, Budget Officer

Voting by City Council: “Aye” “Nay” Stephen Brown _____ _____ Paul Glover _____ _____ Quinn Sperry _____ _____ Brent Moore _____ _____ Wayne Sharp _____ _____ ATTEST: __________________________________ Rori L. Andreason, MMC, Midvale City Recorder

1


May 3, 2016

SUBJECT: Adoption of Ordinance No. 2016-O-04, a Text Amendment to eliminate the mixed-use requirement for buildings over five stories in the State Street Commercial and TOD zones SUBMITTED BY: Lesley Burns, City Planner SUMMARY: Following discussions, public hearings, and recommendations on possible text amendments regarding building heights and setbacks in areas immediately adjacent to single family residential zones, specifically in the RM-12, RM-25, State Street Commercial (SSC) and Transit Oriented Development (TOD) zones, the City Council took action at its last meeting on April 19, 2016. It was the decision of the City Council to make no changes to the current ordinance, with the exception of removing the mixed-use requirement for buildings over five stories in the SSC and TOD zones, until a more comprehensive review of all of the issues can be done based on the considerations and goals of the General Plan update. Based on this decision, Staff has prepared an ordinance, Ordinance No. 2016-O-04, which amends the language requiring buildings over five stories to be mixed-use in the SSC and TOD zones. FISCAL IMPACT: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the City Council adopts the ordinance as presented. RECOMMENDED MOTION: “I move that we adopt Ordinance No. 2016-O-04 as presented.” Attachment:

• Proposed Ordinance No. 2016-O-04

ORDINANCE NO. 2016-O-04

AN ORDINANCE ELIMINATING THE MIXED-USE REQUIREMENT FOR BUILDINGS OVER FIVE STORIES IN THE STATE STREET COMMERCIAL AND TRANSIT ORIENTED DEVELOPMENT ZONES (SECTIONS 17-7-7, 17-7-8 OF THE MIDVALE MUNICIPAL CODE); ALSO PROVIDING A SAVING CLAUSE AND AN EFFECTIVE DATE FOR THE ORDINANCE.

WHEREAS, pursuant to Sections 10-9a-501 through 10-9a-504 Utah State Code, the City has the authority to make and amend a zoning plan which divides the City into zoning districts and within those districts to regulate the erection, construction, re-construction, alteration, and uses of buildings and structures and the uses of land to promote the prosperity, improve the morals, peace and good order, comfort, convenience, and aesthetics of the municipality; and WHEREAS, on January 2, 2002, the Midvale City Zoning Ordinance (Title 17 of the Midvale Municipal Code) became effective and may be subject to amendments from time to time; and WHEREAS, since this effective date, Midvale City has found a number of areas that require amendments to the text of the ordinance in order to correct errors and omissions, clarify the intent of the language, and/or include new provisions to further the purpose and intent; and WHEREAS, on September 15, 2015, the Midvale City Council adopted a temporary land use regulation, Ordinance No. 2015-O-09, creating an opportunity to address the challenges associated with implementing the existing zoning ordinances with respect to building height, setbacks and landscape buffers for higher density/intensity projects adjacent to single family residential neighborhoods; and

WHEREAS, during the six-month period of this temporary land use regulation, the City, through workshop meetings with the City Council and Planning Commission, discussed ways to amend the development standards in the RM-12, RM-25, SSC and TOD zones to address these transition areas; and

WHEREAS, the Planning Commission held a public hearing on March 9, 2016 to formally consider proposed text amendment language regarding this issue, with such meeting being preceded by notice through publication in the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News on February 24, 2016, and the Planning Commission forwarded a recommendation on such to the City Council on March 23, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council of Midvale City, Utah held a public hearing on April 19, 2016, which meeting was preceded by notice through publication in the Salt Lake Tribune and Deseret News on April 5, 2016; and WHEREAS, the City Council took into consideration citizen testimony, planning analysis, and the Planning Commission’s recommendation, and determined that no

Ordinance No. 2016-O-04

changes be made to the ordinance, with the exception of removing the mixed use requirement for buildings over five stories, until a more comprehensive review of all of the issues can be done that is based on the considerations and goals of the General Plan Update. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the City Council of Midvale City, Utah as follows: Section 1. The following chapters and sections of the Midvale Municipal Code are hereby amended as included in the ATTACHMENT A to this document. Section 2. If any part of this ordinance or the applications thereof to any person or circumstances shall, for any reason, be adjudged by a court of competent jurisdiction to be unconstitutional or invalid, such judgment shall not affect, impair or invalidate the remainder of this ordinance or the application thereof to other persons and circumstances, but shall be confined to its operation to the section, subdivision, sentence or part of the section and the persons and circumstances directly involved in the controversy in which such judgment shall have been rendered. It is hereby declared to be the intent of the City Council that this section would have been adopted if such invalid section, provisions, subdivision, sentence or part of a section or application had not been included. Section 3. This ordinance shall be effective upon publication of a summary thereof. PASSED AND APPROVED this ____ day of _______________, 2016.

________________________________________ JoAnn B. Seghini, Mayor

ATTEST: __________________________ Rori Andreason, MMC City Recorder Date of first publication: ______________

Voting by City Council “Aye” “Nay” Stephen Brown Paul Glover Paul Hunt Wayne Sharp Quinn Sperry


ATTACHMENT A

Text Additions Text Deletions

TOD Zone – Chapter 17-7-8 1. Amend Section 17-7-8.4, medium and high density residential development

standards, as follows:

A. Setbacks. New development shall comply with the following setbacks:

4. Single Family Setback. The minimum setback from the property line, when adjacent to a single family residential zone, is fifteen feet, subject to the following exceptions:

a. Three-story structures must be set back thirty-seven feet; four-story structures must be set back sixty-six feet; and five-story structures must be set back eighty-three feet; six-story structures must be setback one hundred feet; and seven-story structures must be setback one hundred sixteen feet.

b. Projections. Sills, cornices, chimneys, flues, eaves, and ornamental features may project into the rear yard up to two and one-half feet.

c. Stairs and Balconies. Outside stairways and balconies may project into the rear yard up to three feet.

C. Height. The maximum height for a residential structure is five seven stories. Buildings of six and seven stories are limited to State Street and 7200 South frontages. When a residential structure is located within sixty-five feet of a single family structure, the maximum height of the structure or portion of the structure is three stories.

E. Floor Area Ratio. For development of medium and high density residential uses, the maximum FAR is 1.5 3.0.

G. Stories. All building types must be from one to five seven stories. Six and seven story buildings are limited to State Street and 7200 South frontages.


2. Amend Section 17-7-8.5; retail, office and mixed-use development standards; as

follows:

D. Height.

1. Mixed-Use. The maximum height for a mixed-use structure is seven stories. Buildings of six and seven stories are limited to State Street and 7200 South frontages. When a mixed-use structure or portion of a structure is located within sixty-five feet of a single family residential structure outside the project/development boundary, the maximum height of the structure or portion of the structure is three stories.

2. Commercial. The maximum height for a commercial structure is five stories. When a commercial structure is located within sixty-five feet of a single family structure outside the project/development boundary, the maximum height of the structure or portion of the structure is three stories.

E. Floor Area Ratio. For new mixed-use development, the minimum FAR is 0.80 and the maximum FAR is 3.0. For development commercial uses, the FAR is 0.80.

SSC Zone – Chapter 17-7-7 1. Amend Section 17-7-7.4 Lot and development standards as follows:

C. Height.

1. Mixed-Use. The maximum height for a mixed-use structure is fifty-five feet for a sloped roof or fifty-two feet for a flat roof, and may extend up to seventy-five feet for a sloped roof or seventy-two feet for a flat roof for portions of the structure more than fifty feet from a single family residential zoning district.

2. Commercial. The maximum height for a commercial structure is thirty-five feet for a sloped roof or thirty-two feet for a flat roof, and may extend up to fifty-five feet for a sloped roof or fifty-two feet for a flat roof for portions of the structure more than fifty feet from a single family residential zoning district.


May 3, 2016

SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing for May 17, 2016 and Discussion on a General Plan Amendment request from low density residential to medium density residential and a Rezone request from Single Family Residential (SF-1) with an Agricultural Overlay to Multi Family Residential (RM-12) on 0.66 acres located at 189-193 East 8000 South. SUBMITTED BY: Lesley Burns, City Planner SUMMARY: The applicant, Steve Brendle, is proposing to expand the White Pines townhouse development onto the two parcels to the west of the existing development along 8000 South. These parcels, located at 189 East and 193 East 8000 South, are narrow, deep lots with older single family homes and are currently zoned single family residential (SF-1) with an Agricultural Overlay (AO). As shown on the attached concept plan, the intent is to extend the existing private road from White Pines Phase VI to access some of the proposed new units, with other new units proposed along 8000 South. The applicant was the original developer of the White Pines project, and is working with the White Pines Homeowners Association on this proposed expansion. At this time, the applicant is requesting that the two parcels, totaling 0.66 acres, be re-designated from a low density residential use to a medium density residential use on the General Plan Proposed Land Use Map and rezoned from SF-1 AO to RM-12 (multi-family residential 12 units per acre). Provided this General Plan Amendment/Rezone request receives a favorable decision, the applicant will move forward with the development application for the project itself. General Plan Amendment and Rezone Under Section 17-3-1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may grant, a rezoning application if it determines the rezoning is consistent with the goals and policies of the Midvale City General Plan, and the following:

1. The proposed rezoning is necessary either to comply with the Midvale City General Plan Proposed Land Use Map, or to provide land for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the Midvale City General Plan;

2. Existing zoning was either the result of a clerical error or a mistake of fact, or that it failed to take into account the constraints on development created by natural

2

characteristics of the land, including but not limited to steep slopes, floodplain, unstable soils, and inadequate drainage; or

3. Land surrounding environs has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changed character of the area.

The north side of 8000 South between the TRAX line and 300 East is primarily zoned RM-12, with some SF-1/Agricultural Overlay zoning interspersed. The adjacent RM-12 zoning was changed during 2000-2003 to accommodate the various phases of the White Pines development. This rezone request is on property directly west of the existing RM-12 zone. The General Plan shows this property as a low density residential designation. The City Council has amended the General Plan on the parcels that have become RM-12 to a medium density residential designation prior to the zone changes occurring. This request would be an orderly progression of the medium density land use designation and RM-12 zone, particularly with the existing development pattern providing a road access into the property. These properties have a history of code enforcement violations with weeds, storage of junk and general disrepair. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and discussed these requests on April 27, 2016. At this time, the Planning Commission found that:

1. This area is in an area of transition. 2. The single family homes to the north of the proposed area have different access

points than this project. 3. This is an extension of an existing HOA, not a proposal for a single parcel or

single unit of development. The Planning Commission also forwarded the following motions to the City Council for its consideration:

“Based on the development pattern in the area, I move that we forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to amend the General Plan proposed land use map changing the land use designation on the property at 189-193 East 8000 South from low density residential to medium density residential.”

“Based on compliance with the General Plan, the orderly progression of development that would occur as a result, and creating an opportunity to better utilize and maintain the property, I move that we forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to rezone the property at 189-193 East 8000 South from SF-1 with an Agricultural Overlay to RM-12 for the purpose of expanding the White Pines development.”

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff agrees with the Planning Commission’s recommendations.

3

RECOMMENDED MOTIONS: NA Attachments:

• Vicinity Map • Development Concept • General Plan Proposed Land Use Map • Zoning Map

8000 S

Brady Ln

Tennyson Ave

Tapp

Ln

Station St

Mille

rberg

Dr

Cypre

ss P

ine C

v

Alpine

Fir C

v

White Spruce Cv

White Pines Townhouses Phase VIII189-193 East 8000 South

Project Area

JT Engineering, PC7955 South 2325 EastSouth Weber, Utah

ph [email protected]

LOT 617 LOT 616 LOT 615

LOT 618 LOT 619

LOT 627 LOT 626 LOT 625

LOT 707

LOT 701 LOT 702 LOT 703

LOT 706 LOT 705 LOT 704

LOT 708 LOT 709

lburns

Rectangle

lburns

Callout

General Plan Amendment

lburns

Typewritten Text

7800 S

8000 S

Angel

St

100 E

280 E

300 E

8135 S

Brady Ln

Tennyson Ave

150 E

Millerberg Dr210 E

Ct

Harve

l Dr

Bryce Dr

Celeste Dr

Tapp

Ln

Resaca Dr

Eaglebrook Dr

Station St

8220 S

270 E

Candlestick Ln

Not N

amed

Sand

ra Way

Tenn

yson

Cir

8180 S

Station Landing Way

Cypre

ss P

ine C

v

230 E

Ch adH eight sLn

Alpine

Fir C

v

300 E

Harve

l Dr

SF-1

CI

SF1-AO

TODRM-12

SF-2

SF-2 RM-25

RM-12

MU

RM-12

SF-2 SF1-DO

SF1-DOSF1-AO

RM-12

RM-12

SF1-DO

SF1-DO SF1-DO

Rezone Area

189-193 East 8000 South


May 3, 2016

SUBJECT: Set Public Hearing for May 17, 2016 and Discussion on a Rezone request from Regional Commercial to Single Family Residential (SF-1) on a 0.72 acre parcel located at 193 West 8600 South. SUBMITTED BY: Lesley Burns, City Planner SUMMARY: The applicant, Brandon Fry, is requesting that the property located at 193 West 8600 South be rezoned from Regional Commercial (RC) to Single Family Residential (SF-1). This property includes an older single family house and is 0.72 acres in size. The applicant is making this request in order to develop the property into three single family residential lots. The applicant has provided a concept plan illustrating the anticipated use of the property; however, the subdivision plat is not being reviewed at this time. Under Section 17-3-1 of the Zoning Ordinance, the Planning Commission may recommend, and the City Council may grant, a rezoning application if it determines the rezoning is consistent with the goals and policies of the Midvale City General Plan, and the following:

1. The proposed rezoning is necessary either to comply with the Midvale City General Plan Proposed Land Use Map, or to provide land for a community need that was not anticipated at the time of the adoption of the Midvale City General Plan;

2. Existing zoning was either the result of a clerical error or a mistake of fact, or that it failed to take into account the constraints on development created by natural characteristics of the land, including but not limited to steep slopes, floodplain, unstable soils, and inadequate drainage; or

3. Land surrounding environs has changed or is changing to such a degree that it is in the public interest to encourage redevelopment of the area or to recognize the changed character of the area.

The General Plan Proposed Land Use Map designates this property as a low density residential use. The current RC zoning designation is not consistent with the General Plan Proposed Land Use Map; the proposed rezone to SF-1 would make the zoning on the property consistent with the current land use designation. The property directly east, although zoned RC, is currently being used as single family residential. The property directly west is an existing commercial use.

2

With the exception of the properties to the west of this parcel, 8600 South is primarily a single family residential neighborhood west of the canal near State Street to Harrison Street. 8600 South functions and is designed as a neighborhood road. The location is not conducive to most commercial uses with its lack of visibility and traffic. It is better suited for a residential type development. The applicant has provided a narrative on the rezone request. Planning Commission Recommendation The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing and discussed this request on April 27, 2016. At this time, the Planning Commission found that:

1. The existing use is compatible with the proposed rezone. 2. This rezone is necessary to comply with the General Plan proposed Land Use Map,

and is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan. The Planning Commission also forwarded the following motion to the City Council for its consideration:

“Based on compliance with the Midvale City General Plan, the findings adopted by this Commission and the existing development in the area, I move that we forward a positive recommendation to the City Council to rezone the property at 193 West 8600 South from Regional Commercial (RC) to Single Family Residential (SF-1).”

FISCAL IMPACT: N/A STAFF RECOMMENDATION: Staff agrees with the Planning Commission’s recommendations. RECOMMENDED MOTION: NA Attachments:

• Vicinity Map • Development Concept • General Plan Proposed Land Use Map • Zoning Map • Applicant Narrative

8600 S

Monro

e St

Chloe Way

Harris

on S

t

8640 S

Cottage Ave

Amanda Lynn Ln

8710 S

290 W

8480 SPamela Way

Paula Dr

Kolby

Ln Rory Ln

Settlement Cir

Rach

el Ma

rie W

ay

Zona

Cir

SandyM arie Ln

Judy Dr

Rand

y Cir

8600 South Rezone193 West 8600 South

Rezone Area

z q CD - o ln FU ts o E] N V)

-1 Ed U (/) o z ? l! z L,/

Irl

L,/

.. o o

>E ;z >-t

in r

il

>o

>E

ano

YZ

zv '-o oe <,:

ll)o oz <,1 ;9 -z >= oo OC

C-l =z

cz F_ 5

II t: ll ql #

-n:

";i

+-

I

;i! :ll t!! Ii

? o rra ln I t ri

EtE

iiliii

rElE

iiiili

r;]H

"" iii:

ill;

lE E

It iir

iit!

ld tE

l liiiir

!I

irt i

iI

:3::t

| 'ri

i:

Ei|g

c:til

lL;

E

ti.'.1

-*-

lA

iElg

L 12

itil

t=E

ii

linil

tr

to9l

af;

lo

{tii

lz1:

iiti E

i;

lburns

Rectangle

lburns

Callout

Rezone Area

8600 S

State

St

Monro

e St

8710 S

Chloe Way

Paula Dr

Cir

Harris

on S

t

Cottage Ave

8640 S

Amanda Lynn Ln

Settlement Cir

8720 S

Pamela Way

Judy Dr

290 W

8480 S

Brit C

ir

Kolby

Ln

Durant Ave

Rory Ln

Foxbridge Dr

Westb

ridge

Rd

Rach

el Ma

rie W

ay

8760 S

Zona

Cir

8680 S

Eastbridge Rd

Main StSandy Marie Ln

Lola

Cir

Rand

y Cir

8640 S

SF-1SSC

RC

RM-12

SF1-AO

SF-1

CI

RM-25

lburns

Rectangle

lburns

Callout

Rezone Area

From: Brandon FryTo: Lesley BurnsSubject: 8600 S 193 W RezoneDate: Wednesday, April 6, 2016 3:20:28 PM

To whom it may concern-

I am requesting a rezone for the property located at 8600 S 193 W forthe purpose of creating additional value through building 3 new singlefamily homes. Currently the property is zoned for commercial use and inmy speaking with the majority of the surrounding neighbors they havevoiced their concern and displease with the thought of having moreasphalt and block buildings as their neighbors. I have also discoveredthat 8600 S is not to have large commercial trucks use this road fordeliveries and it continues to occur even though the neighbors have madecomplaints to the city. I believe the most fitting use for this spaceis to create a copacetic atmosphere that is more in line with thedesires and aesthetics of the neighborhood which would be single familyresidences. Thank you.

--Thanks,Brandon Fry801-718-1331www.grayhawkllc.com

mailto:[email protected]

mailto:[email protected]

Documents

Midvale City 7505 South Holden Street ... · Chief Mason introduced Detective Archuleta who has put together a program for the high school regarding texting and driving. She said