Upload
others
View
3
Download
0
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
1 P8 1.2 Bank has implemented Oracle Financial Services
Applications (OFSAA), namely Oracle Financial Services
Funds Transfer Pricing & Performance Analyzer,
Profitability Management and Oracle Financial Services
Asset Liability Management.
Pl validate our understanding that Bank has
implemented OFSA ALM, TP, PA modules. Would be
better if all the modules presently in place are listed
again. There seems to be a gap between different
sections in RFP
Pls refer Pt. No. 1.2 on pg.8
and please be guided by the
RFP
2 P8 1.3.b b) The "Bidder" as used in this RFP shall mean the one
who has submitted a duly signed and valid Bid, in all
respects. All certificates received hereby shall be
furnished and signed by the person so authorized and
any other documents (including any clarifications sought
and subsequent correspondences) received hereby shall
be signed by the person so authorized
Do we have to submit a Power of Attorney for the
person signing the Bid?
Pls refer Annex-13, Pt. No. 6
on pg.87
We propose bank to allow consortium/sub-contracting
with other than OEM also
No change in the RFP
Pl validate that bidder deploying a few key skill partner
resources is allowed. It will be towards achieving best
possible solution for Bank. Sec 2.7 and 4.1 seem to be
validating this understanding. Bidder would, however,
act as single point of contact with Bank
No change in the RFP
4 P9 1.4 applicant bidder should be a body corporate and
registered body in India with a minimum annual
turnover of Rs. 20 Crores for the last financial year
We request minimum turnover to be put as Rs 100 cr, to
ensure quality bidders' participation with solid financials
No change in the RFP
5 P9 1.4 applicant bidder should have positive net worth in the
last three financial years
We request to link this criteria to Net profit for last three
years, to ensure quality bidder's participation having
solid recent financials
No change in the RFP
Migration, Upgradation and Customisations of Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications (OFSAA) and Implementation of Liquidity Risk Management (LRM)
System At IDBI Bank Limited
Ref no.: RFP No. IDBI/PCell/RFP/14-15/17 dt. 23.01.2015
Pre Bid Queries Received as on 29 Jan 2015
Consortium / Teaming agreement with other than OEM
will not be allowed.
1.3.hP93
Page 1 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
6 P9 1.4 Bidder should have all necessary licenses, permissions,
consents,
no objections, approvals as required under law for
carrying out
its business. - Copy of relevant Documents
Please be specific what needs to be submitted with
respect to OFSAA project
Please be guided by the RFP
7 P9 1.4 bidder should have two of the three proposed solutions
(ALM, FTP and PM) implemented or under
implementation in minimum one scheduled commercial
bank in India
To ensure bidding by more experienced bidders, we
request to amend this clause as 'bidder should have two
of the three modules (ALM, FTP and PM) of OFSAA 6.x
successfully implemented in minimum one scheduled
commercial bank in India. It should also have the third
module implementation experience on OFSAA 6.x'
No change in the RFP
We request Bank to allow implementation experience of
partner/OEM also for eligibility
No change in the RFP
Request to modify the mentioned clause to read as
Applicant Bidder / OEM
No change in the RFP
9 P9 1.4 Bank means a Scheduled Commercial Bank in India
having at least 300 branches as on the date of RFP
To ensure bid by bidders having experience of
implementing OFSAA at similar scale banks, we suggest
to amend as 'Bank means a Scheduled Commercial Bank
in India having at least 2000 branches as on the date of
RFP'
No change in the RFP
10 P9 1.4 The above implementations should have commenced
within Four previous years from the date of this RFP.
Necessary documents are to be submitted with the bid.
Request to modify the mentioned clause to read as
Applicant Bidder / OEM
No change in the RFP
11 P9 1.4 The applicant bidder should have trained manpower and
expertise with experience in OFSAA implementation for
any Bank in India with at least one resource having
experience in implementation of OFSAA 6.x project to
execute the modules being migrated / implemented.
Bidder has to submit the data migration team profiles as
per Annexure 16 – Project Team Profile.
Request to modify the mentioned clause to read as
Applicant Bidder / OEM
No change in the RFP
The applicant bidder should have two of the three
proposed solutions (ALM, FTP and PM)
implemented or under implementation in minimum one
scheduled commercial bank in India.Bank means a
1.4P98
Page 2 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
12 P9 1.4 Teaming Agreement with OEM is mandatory and as per
role of OEM defined in the RFP.
Request you to drop teaming requirement with OEM.
We wish to submit a bid on our own without any
partner/teaming/consortium. We have adequate
experience and resources required for the
implementation of the project and hence donot need
external help. We request you to kindly note that the
OEM has not implemented version 6.x in India yet.
Further all implementations of OFSAA in India since
version 5.x are being done by service providers
independant of the OEM.
No change in the RFP
13 P12 1.6.5 All prospective Bidders shall furnish a teaming
agreement with OEM (Oracle Financial Services
Software Limited) for the “OEM Role in the Project”
mentioned in this RFP and submit the same as part of
the bid document.
Request you to drop teaming requirement with OEM.
We wish to submit a bid on our own without any
partner/teaming/consortium. We have adequate
experience and resources required for the
implementation of the project and hence donot need
external help. We request you to kindly note that the
OEM has not implemented version 6.x in India yet.
Further all implementations of OFSAA in India since
version 5.x are being done by service providers
independant of the OEM.
No change in the RFP
14 P16 2.7 experience need not be in the current product version
proposed
As Bank is looking to implement OFSAA 6.x, it would be
better to seek similar experience in terms of 'experience
should be on OFSAA v 6.x'
No change in the RFP
15 P17 3.1 Scope of Work Apart from Basel 3 Liquidity implentation does the bank
want to cover new requirements in ALM, FTP and Cost
allocations
Please be guided by the RFP
16 P17 3.1.1 and
3.1.3
Existing version of OFS modules….Upgrade version of
OFSAA
Is migration kit to migrate from OFSA 4.5.39 to OFSAA
6.x available?
The Bidder has to develop the
migration / extraction tool
Has the bank procured license for the listed modules. Please be guided by the RFP
Is Asset Liability Management Analytics (ALMBI) also
installed currently
No
Project Objective3.1.1P1717
Page 3 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
18 P17 3.1.1 Oracle RDBMS 10g Does IDBI Bank planning to procure 12C database
licenses
Bank will ensure adequate
database licenses are in place
19 P17 3.1.1 f Oracle Financial Services Profitability Analytics How many dashboards are created using Profitability
Analytics. Was there any customized cubes created for
those dashboards. Can these reports be redeveloped in
OBIEE
Will be shared to the
successful bidder
20 P17 3.1.3 Bank expects to realize the following functional and
technical benefits:
Assuming that bank has taken into consideration the
feasibility check of functional and technical requirements
and decided to upgrade their solution architecture . As
an implementation partner do we need to have an
feasibility check on bank’s functional and technical
requirements ?
Please refer the Scope of work
as defined in the RFP
21 P17 3.1.3 c Support of new modules for Basel III liquidity risk
management compliance and ready-to-use ALM
analytics/dashboards.
Is the bank interested in procuring OFSAA LRM and
ALMMBI Module?
Bank may choose procuring
LRM which includes this as a
pre-requisite
Oracle Pricing Management - Transfer pricing
component only facilitates Transfer pricing, Is Bank
procuring Oracle Financial Services Pricing Management,
Capital Charge Component, this module integrates with
Oracle ERM.
Provide details of relevant Risk softwares used in the
bank
Bank has license for Transfer
Pricing.
Capital Charge is out of scope
Integration with Risk Software
is not in the scope
Please provide details of relavant Risk Softwares used in
the Bank
Integration with Risk Software
is not in the scope
Oracle Pricing Manager supports integration with Oracle
Risk software for capital required.
3.1.3 gP1722
Page 4 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
23 P17 3.1.3 h Oracle Financial Services Analytical Applications
Infrastructure (AAI) 6.x
Oracle Financial Services Asset Liability Management
(ALM) 6.x
Oracle Financial Services Funds Transfer Pricing(FTP) 6.x
Oracle Financial Services Profitability Manager (PM) 6.x
Oracle Financial Services Pricing Manager 6.x
Oracle Warehouse Builder(OWB) 11.x
Oracle RDBMS 11.x
Oracle Business Intelligence Enterprise Edition (OBIEE)
11.x
Oracle Financial Services Profitability Analytics v5.x
Kindly let us know if ALM analytics is out of scope?
Kindly let us know if vendor can propose reconciliation
framework.
Does the Bank use OWB as ETL tool ?
ALM analytics will be part of
LRM proposed in the RFP.
No reconciliation framework is
in the scope.
Yes, OWB is the ETL tool being
used by the Bank.
Please provide the complete list of the Modules to be
implemented/upgraded
Please be guided by the RFP
List does not include :
Oracle Liquidity Risk Management? Is LRM part of the
scope?
Oracle Pricing Management Capital Charge Component
For LRM scope please be
guided by the RFP
Capital Charge is out of scope
LRM, ALM BI, OFS AAAI modules are missing. Can we pl
have clarification on final list of modules to be
implemented
Bank may choose procuring
LRM which includes this as a
pre-requisite
25 P18 3.1.4 With this objective, the Bank is floating the Request for
Proposal (‘RFP’) to address above issues
with regards to the implementation of the Solution
including the proposed LRM.
Will the cost incurred for overseas implementation
borne by bank ?
Activities is expected to be
carried out from Mumbai for
both Domestic and Overseas
operations
Pl clarify if overseas regulatory/internal MIS compliance
reports are in scope or only India domestic reports will
be in scope
It is only India related
requirements to be fulfilled by
including data of overseas
branch for consolidation
List of Modules for implementation3.1.3 iP1824
Bank invites bids to implement OFSAA Solution for its
domestic and one overseas operation
3.1.5P1826
Page 5 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Overseas operations data only will be used to generate
India specific reporting requirements or is overseas
regulatory/internal compliance also in scope? Stated
otherwise, is only India related requirements to be
fulfilled with data of overseas branch also or is overseas
specific reports/calculations also need to be developed
seperately
It is only India related
requirements to be fulfilled by
including data of overseas
branch for consolidation
Are only India reporting requirements in scope? Or, does
has foreign reporting requirements as well?
It is only India related
requirements to be fulfilled by
including data of overseas
branch for consolidation
The overseas implementation is a separate instance or
the same instance as India instance?
It’s the same instance
Will there be proper approval process for addition of
third party interfaces with OFSAA or systematic changes
during the phase of project ? If so does effort and cost
gets covers under the contract or it would be
reconsidered ? Probable no of interfaces which are
covered under scope ?
All Interfaces mentioned in the
RFP needs to be done. Any
other interfaces will be
handled through change
control using man-day rates
mentioned in the bid
We are not clear and also in terms of contract period
(within the contract period or contract to be extended as
per the requirement)?
Please be guided by the RFP
This is too open a requirement and can lead to uncapped
scope creep during the execution. Request the bank to
limit this requirement so that the bidder can estimate
appopriately
All Interfaces mentioned in the
RFP needs to be done. Any
other interfaces will be
handled through change
control using man-day rates
mentioned in the bid
Bank invites bids to implement OFSAA Solution for its
domestic and one overseas operation
3.1.5P1826
Bank during the period of the Contract, based on its
technical and functional requirement can add additional
third party application and interfaces to the OFSAA
Solution. Bidder has to extend all necessary support and
assistance for addition to the Solution with the required
third party applications and interfaces desired by the
Bank.
3.1.6P1827
Page 6 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Any new interfaces that are introduced post
requirement finalization will be addressed through
change request process
All Interfaces mentioned in the
RFP needs to be done. Any
other interfaces will be
handled through change
control using man-day rates
mentioned in the bid
New requirements will need to be discussed for scope
change. Please confirm if this is acceptable
No change in the RFP
This clause is very open ended and has high probability
of occurrence resulting in breach of project timelines.
Request bank to have this goverened under change
control process as mutually agreed
No change in the RFP
29 P18 3.2 Project Scope Would a single vendor get the implementation work for
all OFSAA applications or the work can be split across
multiple vendors?
Please be guided by the RFP
30 P19 3.2.3 System integrator responsible for requirement gathering Is the data mapping between source system and OFSAA
been created or is part of the current exercise?
Please be guided by the RFP
31 P19 3.2.3.1 ALM Reports Please specify the frequency of report generation report
wise
Daily
32 P19 3.2.3.1 g Stress Testing for interest rate and liquidity risk Pl validate that stress testing would be handled through
scenario analysis or is a full fledged stress testing module
required?
Bank may choose procuring
LRM.
Please be guided by the RFP.
33 P19 3.2.3.1 h Forecast Income Statement and Balance Sheet Analysis Pl validate that full fledged Balance Sheet Planning
module of OFSAA is expected or only ALM cash flows to
be used for dynamic liquidity report?
Balance Sheet Planning
module not in scope
Bank during the period of the Contract, based on its
technical and functional requirement can add additional
third party application and interfaces to the OFSAA
Solution. Bidder has to extend all necessary support and
assistance for addition to the Solution with the required
third party applications and interfaces desired by the
Bank.
3.1.6P1827
The Bidder should ensure that all systemic changes or
new requirements necessitated out of regulatory
guidelines or other Bank requirements between the date
of the RFP as well as implementation and roll out are
made available from day one of the solution going live.
3.1.7P1828
Page 7 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
34 P19 3.2.3.2
3.2.3.3
Funds Transfer Pricing & Cost Allocations (Profitability
Management)
Are there any changes to the policy (Transfer Pricing,
Transfer pricing online and Cost Allocations) currently
implemented at the bank ? If yes, are the revised policy
documents available ?
Currently what dimensions are used and profitability
calculations/reporting is done at what level ?
Will be discussed with the
successful bidder
35 P19 3.2.3.3 Allocation of capital to line of business, branch, product,
customer account
Is this currently done in OFSA 4.5.x? Currently not done in OFSA
but included in the scope of
the RFP
36 P19 3.2.3.4 The Bidder has to provide the hardware sizing based on
the projections provided by the Bank to ensure
availability, scalability, redundancy and performance of
the solution and to meet the requirements as per the
terms of the RFP within the timeframe prescribed by the
Bank. In case the Bank decides to opt for Exadata, the
bidder has to ensure that the implementation is
seamlessly done so as to get the desired benefits.
Please confirm, if the bidder needs to provide solution
sizing only, or we need to quote for hardware as well in
commercial Bid.
Pls refer Pg. No. 21, Pt.No.
3.2.3.6.
If an SI has proven track record and resource pool of
implementing OFSAA 6.x on its own, adding 20% OEM
effort at high cost would inflate commercials. We
request to make this clause as optional and with no floor
on engagement
No change in the RFP
As the modules like FTP, ALM and PM are more stable
modules, can the clause OEM's involvement of minimum
20% of total efforts be relaxed to just LRM/PFTBI/ALMBI
module.
No change in the RFP
OEM Role in the Project - The OEM involvement in the
overall implementation, support, sustenance, etc., must
be at the minimum 20% of the total efforts in each of
the OFSAA modules
3.2.3.537 P20
Page 8 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Request you to drop teaming requirement with OEM.
We wish to submit a bid on our own without any
partner/teaming/consortium. We have adequate
experience and resources required for the
implementation of the project and hence donot need
external help. We request you to kindly note that the
OEM has not implemented version 6.x in India yet.
Further all implementations of OFSAA in India since
version 5.x are being done by service providers
independant of the OEM.
No change in the RFP
Please provide sizing details of existing HW. Please
provide current environment details where OFSA is
deployed (example: windows or Linux Servers)
Is there any preference for OFSAA deployment ?
Will be discussed with the
successful bidder
The decision is important to be taken on an immediate
basis as this will effect the commercials.
Bank is actively considering
this.
Oracle must have given hardware sizing. Do you want us
to review it or suggest afresh?
The HW sizing will be finalized
by the Bank in consultation
with the OEM/Successful
Bidder
Pl clarify if bidder needs to supply hardware or will bank
provide these based on sizing recommendations by
bidder. Pl also clarify if Bank will do the installation of
hardware or will SI be required to do
Please be guided by the RFP
39 P22 3.2.3.6 Bank during the period of the contract, based on its
technical and functional requirement can add additional
third party application and interfaces to the OFSAA
Solution.
What is the scope of 3rd party application plug-in? Have
the 3rd party applications been identified?
All Interfaces mentioned in the
RFP needs to be done. Any
other interfaces will be
handled through change
control using man-day rates
mentioned in the bid
OEM Role in the Project - The OEM involvement in the
overall implementation, support, sustenance, etc., must
be at the minimum 20% of the total efforts in each of
the OFSAA modules
3.2.3.537 P20
38 P21 3.2.3.6 In case the Bank decides to opt for Exadata, the bidder
has to ensure that the implementation is seamlessly
done so as to get the desired benefits.
The Bidder has to provide the hardware sizing
Page 9 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
40 P22 3.2.3.6 The prices quoted for the line items would be valid and
used throughout the period of the Contract
As we understand, the requirements on
ALM/LRM/FTP/PM are not frozen and feasibility of
migration is not clear. In such a scenario can the
programme be on T&M basis instead of Fixed Cost?
Please be guided by the RFP
41 P22 3.2.3.6 The Bidders have to necessarily ensure that all required
functionality implemented in existing version is also
available in the upgraded Solution.
To clarify , the existing functionality can be implemented
in newer version provided same is supported by latest
OFSAA framework;
Please be guided by the RFP
42 P22 3.2.4.1 Bidder is required to migrate, customize, test,
implement, train and rollout the upgraded version of
OFSAA application
If it is decided that an altogether new implementation of
OFSA would be more effective from time, cost and
feasibility perspective, new implementation route may
be adopted instead of migrating existing OFSA. Pl
validate
It’s a Technical upgrade with
add-ons to be implemented
43 P23 3.2.5 Interface and Integration Requirements If possible, please share current OFSA deployment
diagram
Is the bank using / having DW ?
Will be shared with the
successful bidder.
Bank is not having DW.
44 P23 3.2.5.2 The Bidder is required to upgrade interfaces between
the proposed Solution with the applications and systems
mentioned below (not limited to).
Does this involve extraction of data (involving writing
new/rewriting existing extraction scripts) from the given
source systems for upgrade interface requirement?
No
When developing the interfaces, the Bidder should
ensure the requirements of data format, frequency of
data transfer, quality checks and validations before data
transfer and priorities for data transfer are identified
and addressed
Data extraction will be done by source systems/support
teams or these will have to be done by SI under this RFP
Please be guided by the RFP
Under Interface and Integration requirements /support” Would the data format requirement have to be
presented for prior review or not before implementing
them?
Please be guided by the RFP
46 P24 3.2.5.12 Bidder will help/assist the Bank in preparing the test
cases for the testing
Pl validate that preparing UAT test cases would be bank
responsibility and bidder would only assist the Bank in
this regard
Please be guided by the RFP
3.2.5.8P2345
Page 10 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
The methodology should address all stages including
development, customization, and hardware/software
installation/configuration services
To Clarify if bidder is expected to install and configure
hardware?
The scope is for providing the
services as per the RFP
…sign off process for each of the deliverables at various
stages including review and sign-off by OEM for each of
the critical stages….
Is the sign-off by OEM a mandatory requirement? Can
this be waived?
Please be guided by the RFP
Is there any flexibility of onsite - offshore Please be guided by the RFP
Is bank open to accepting a suitable mix of onsite-offsite
model towards cost optimisation. Sec 3.5.3 mentions
'Bidder will have to carry out all the customization
related work at the premises of the Bank or off-site in
case the customization cannot be carried out at the Bank
premises'
For clarity purpose no offsite
development will be
permitted
48 P25 3.2.6.1 Functional Requirements Specification Study
Bidder is expected to prepare detailed documentation,
presentation, workflows for the business processes
affected due to implementation of the OFSA Solution
and other applications implementation.
The bidder will provide Business Process Impact due to
OFSAA implementation not for other application
implementation
Please be guided by the RFP
To clarify if bidder is supposed to review and enhace the
current BRD to suite the Bank's current business and
process?
Please be guided by the RFP
What is the ETL tool the bank has procured to assist in
data mapping, cleansing etc. during the data migration
exercise?
OWB
3.2.6P2447
The System integrator will need to ensure that these
resources are on the ground in the project on a full time
onsite basis during the implementation phase and the
bank will verify the same through a review of resumes
and organizational photo id, timesheets and by taking an
undertaking from the vendor and any other means
necessary.
The Bidder is also expected to identify the current state
gaps between the procedures and practices followed by
the Bank with the integrated OFSA solution
3.4.1P2549
Page 11 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
What is the max no of reports to be considered as part
of scope (besides additional 50 reports effort as
mentioned in the bid document)
Currently, around 100 Reports
are available in the existing
modules. The existing reports
are to be considered as part of
migration and as per the
scope of the RFP and any
additional reports will be
considered based on the
quote for one time Cost of
delivering 50 reports that is
part of the TCO.
Kindly Let us know how many overall reports and dash
boards are in scope of work
Kindly Let us know how many custom reports and dash
boards are in scope of work
Currently, around 100 Reports
are available in the existing
modules
Pl indicate total no. of reports to be generated out of
new system. 50 reports will be over and above those
reports
Currently, around 100 Reports
are available in the existing
modules. The existing reports
are to be considered as part of
migration and as per the
scope of the RFP and any
additional reports will be
considered based on the
quote for one time Cost of
delivering 50 reports that is
part of the TCO.
The Bidder needs to provide all existing management,
statutory and regulatory reports as required by the
regulatory institutions. The Bank will not pay any
additional customization costs either for gaps observed
and/or gaps observed for existing management,
statutory or regulatory reports as required by the Bank.
3.4.2P2550
Page 12 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
(a) Has the Bank frozen the reporting requirement?
(b) If so, please share the number and nature of such
reports?
Currently, around 100 Reports
are available in the existing
modules. The existing reports
are to be considered as part of
migration and as per the
scope of the RFP and any
additional reports will be
considered based on the
quote for one time Cost of
delivering 50 reports that is
part of the TCO.
Gaps identified in requriement and standard OFSAA
functionality will need to be discussed for scope and
effort
All existing customization /
Reports are in the scope
Bank at its discretion may avail the development of any
additional reports/MIS.
Has the bank identified the customizations/configuration
required over and above the standard OFSAA
applications?
Will be shared with the
successful bidder
OBIEE Reports Please provide details of currently implemented reports
in each of the subject areas
Will be shared with the
successful bidder
Over and above the Bank’s existing reports How many ad-hoc MIS reports bank has which are over
and obove statutory, regulatory regulatory reports
Will be shared with the
successful bidder
52 P26 3.5.2 Bidder will have to ensure that the software provided as
part of the Integrated OFSAA Solution project meets all
the requirements described in this RFP
Pl clarify that software licenses including those of OFSAA
applications will be supplied by bidder or bank will
provide that
The scope is for providing the
services as per the RFP
53 P26 3.5.3 The Bidder will have to provide all tools, testing
instruments, drivers, consumables, etc. required to
install and
RFP-OFSAA Implementation
Page 27 of 94
customize and test the software free of any fees or
charges or any expenses.
The bidder will suggest the tools and testing instruments
required and its Bank responsibility to have the license
on the same
Please be guided by the RFP
The Bidder needs to provide all existing management,
statutory and regulatory reports as required by the
regulatory institutions. The Bank will not pay any
additional customization costs either for gaps observed
and/or gaps observed for existing management,
statutory or regulatory reports as required by the Bank.
3.4.2P2550
3.4.4P2651
Page 13 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
54 P27 3.7.3 The Bidder will ensure that all gaps identified at the time
of system testing will be immediately resolved.
If any fixing requires OEM action like product bug fixing,
then the resolving time line based on OEM response.
Please be guided by the RFP
55 P27 3.7.4 The Bidder will ensure that gaps pointed out by the
audit and inspection teams
Audit(data auditor) for data migration exercise would be
hired by Bank at their cost or will the vendor has to bear
the cost?
It will be Bank's Internal Audit
teams
All the custom report changes agreed as part of
requirements study will be taken care and any changes
requested while development/testing phases will be
treated based on the complexity of the change request.
Please be guided by the RFP
(a) It is premature to quantify the required changes
without undertaking any study. Would the Bank provide
us with the list of reports where such changes are
required?
(b) In the absence of such details at present, would the
Bank replace the phrase “at no additional cost to the
bank” with the following phrase: “ based on the study of
the reporting requirements and submission of a separate
commercial proposal by the bidder post the study”?
Please be guided by the RFP
57 P28 3.8.3 The Bank expects the Bidder to help set up the required
test & development server at DC at the desired testing
center of the Bank for the purpose of testing
Do you expect the bidder to provide Infrastructure
support as part of this engagement?
No Infrastructure support will
be required.
58 P28 3.8.6 Any deviations/discrepancies/errors observed during the
testing phase will be formally reported to the Bidder and
the Bidder will have to resolve them immediately or
within the UAT approach and guidelines, formulated
between the Bidder and the Bank. The resolution
timelines will be completely aligned to the project
timeline of this RFP.
If any fixing requires OEM action like product bug fixing,
then the resolving time line shall be based on OEM
response.
Please be guided by the RFP
The Bidder shall provide for all subsequent changes to
reports as suggested by the statutory and regulatory
bodies from time to time immediately to the Bank at no
additional cost to the Bank during the Contract period.
3.7.7P2856
Page 14 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
59 P25 3.9 Data Migration
This section describes the scope for Data Migration to
the new integrated OFSA solution. The Bidder may
quote for a one-time cost for this activity. The overview
of the tasks pertaining to data available in electronic
format is as follows for the Bidder:
Can Vendor propose a ETL tool or will the Bank provide
the same?
How many years of historical data migration is under
scope of work?
Bidder is expected to write
Data Extraction programmes
to migrate from existing to
new version of OFSA.
All data currently available
has to be migrated
60 P29 3.9.4 Developing a Data Extraction tool (to extract data from
existing OFSA system)
Delivery to confirm if included in scope Bidder is expected to write
Data Extraction programmes
to migrate from existing to
new version of OFSA.
61 P29 3.9.5 Furnish the data in a format that can be loaded into the
proposed OFSA application
Pl clarify this task will be done by Bank Please be guided by the RFP
Can you please elaborate this point Bidder is expected to write
Data Extraction programmes
to migrate from existing to
new version of OFSA.
Can you please elaborate this point ? Bidder is expected to write
Data Extraction programmes
to migrate from existing to
new version of OFSA.
Pl clarify if OWB to be used as ETL tool. Sec 3.5.4
mentions 'Bidder will be required to use OWB tool to
carry out data mapping, data gap identification, default
values assumption specification, data transformation
and upload from identified data sources to OFSAA
solution'
Please be guided by the RFP
63 P30 3.9.8.e Bidder will take not more than 21 working days from
date of purchase order to
prepare the “Data Migration Strategy” and process
documents.
This should be from project start date ? Please confirm No change in the RFP
The Bidder has to provide the Data Extraction tool
version of existing applications. If required the tool will
be customized by Bidder to meet the Bank’s specific
needs.
3.9.8.aP2962
Page 15 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
64 P30 3.9.8.k It will be the responsibility of Bidder to ensure complete
data cleaning and validation for all data being migrated
to the new OFSAA solution
Data cleaning should be bank responsibility. Bidder will
provide migration test reports. Bidder can give error
reports source system wise to facilitate cleaning by Bank
and can suggest transformations as feasible which bank
will have to agree to before getting executed
Please be guided by the RFP
65 P31 3.9.8.q Bidder will be responsible for uploading the data
entered by the Bank through the manual data entry
screens, programs/applications
Pl validate that no data entry front end tool is expected.
Bidder will ensure upload of all compatible data to new
OFSAA
Please be guided by the RFP
66 P31 3.9.8.v The Bank reserves the right “to audit”/“appoint an
external auditor to audit” the process of data migration
and/or the completeness and accuracy of the data
migrated during the entire exercise of data migrations.
The Bidder has to facilitate audit at no additional cost to
the Bank
How many days effort of external audit to be assumed
for data migration audit activities?
It will be Bank's Internal Audit
teams
67 P31 3.9.8.y Bidder has to provide data comparator tools for the
purpose of checking the source and target data for data
migration success
Pl explain purpose of this tool Please be guided by the RFP
How many users need to be trained in each of the
batches as part of the key training sessions?
Training durations given are for all modules together or
for each module
Around 20 Users in a batch to
be trained per module.
All Modules
Pl validate that training durations given are for all
modules together and not for each module
All Modules
We suggest the given timelines to be revisited as it
involves lot of customizations along with new modules
to be implemented
No change in the RFP
Can vendor propose a timeline than what the bank has
suggested?
No change in the RFP
70 P33 3.12.1 Implementation timeline We request to change the timelines as 7 month for ALM,
9 months for LRM, FTP and Profitability
No change in the RFP
71 P34 3.12.4 Bidder will provide post production support of one
techno-functional analyst for 90 days from Go-live date
at on-site and thereafter off-site support for further 3
months thereafter
Support will start from go-live of individual modules or
from go-live of last module. In case of former, the end
dates will be
Please be guided by the RFP
Training3.10P3268
Project Timelines3.12P3369
Page 16 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
72 P35 3.13 Bid evaluation methodology The PSU RFPs are coming now with technical
qualification and then commercial L1 based awarding.
We request bank to adopt this method as it ensures that
bank gets best price from all bidders. We have seen
banks changing from weighted evaluation to commercial
L1 award. IDBI bank also adopted same methodology in
large bids.
No change in the RFP
73 P34 3.13.1 All credential letters should be as per format specified in
Annexure 15 – Experience Certificate Format and should
be appropriately bound, labeled and segregated in the
respective areas.
Page 89 states -
Bidder has to provide the
a. Experience certificate from the relevant customer as
per the format specified in Annexure 15 – Experience
format or
b. Purchase Orders issued by the customer for
undertaking the implementation
We are planning to submit original Purchase Order
(signed engagement letter) for our credentials. Please
confirm Annexure 15 - Experience Letter is not required
in that case.
Please be guided by the RFP
74 P35 3.13.2.2 Manpower Resources - The bidder should have a pool of
resources with experience in OFSAA implementation for
any Bank in India with at least one resource having
experience in implementation of OFSAA 6.x project.
Request the bank to consider OFSAA 5.6 and above as
resource's implementation experience eligibility criteria.
As version 5.6 is also the fusion OFSAA as 6.x.
No change in the RFP
75 P38 3.14.a Commercial Bid will contain the cost of the support and
maintenance of the application proposed. Technical
compliance should be submitted as per each and every
line item specified by the Bank. The cost to be provided
as per format given in Annexure 2
Bidder would like to clarify as what is the exact duration
of application maintenance terms that bank wants
bidder to consider. (AMC/ATS)
As per the scope the support duration is 90 days onsite
support and 3 months offsite support is currently asked
in RFP
Please be guided by the RFP
Page 17 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
76 P38 3.14.c Octroi / Entry Tax / Local Body Tax (LBT) payable will be
exclusive as applicable at actual, on submission of
original receipt drawn in the name of “IDBI Bank
Limited” and to the satisfaction of the Bank or Bank’s
representatives.
Bidder request to remove the part of clause ' to the
satisfaction of bank or bank's representatives'. Bidder
will be submitting the duly authorized receipts / copies
for Octroi / LBT and hence the later part can be removed
from clause.
Please be guided by the RFP
77 P39 3.18.i Within 7 days of the receipt of acceptance of the Bid by
the successful Bidder
Bidder requests the performance guarantee to be
provided post signing of contract by both the parties.
No change in the RFP
78 P39 3.18.ii The value of the Performance Bank Guarantee will be
10% of the total Contract value.
Please specify the duration for which the Bank
Guarantee should be valid.
PBG to be valid for 1 year plus
6 months
79 P39, 45 3.18.iv &
4.8
The proceeds of the Performance Security shall be
payable to the Bank as compensation for any loss or
damage resulting from the Bidder’s failure to complete
and/or perform its obligations under and in accordance
with the Contract
Performance of the Contract shall be made by the
Bidder strictly in accordance with the time schedule
specified by the Bank. Time is the essence of Contract. A
delay by the Bidder in the performance of its
Contractual obligations, which the Bank in its sole
discretion may adjudge, shall render the Bidder liable to
any or all the following sanctions:
i. Forfeiture of its Performance Bank
Guarantee/Performance Security
ii. Imposition of liquidated damages/penalty, and/or
iii. Termination of the Contract for default
Bidder proposes bank to provide 30 days cure period to
provide remedy to the failure before bank invokes
performance security
No change in the RFP.
However, Cure period as
stated can be considered.
Page 18 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
80 P39 3.18.vii The conditions stipulated in the Agreement/Contract
shall be strictly adhered to and any breach / violation
thereof shall entail termination of the Contract without
prejudice to the other rights of the Bank including but
not limited to the right to levy /impose and recover
penalties as specified in this RFP/Bid or Agreement /
Contract.
Bidder requests the right to terminate can be availed in
case of material breach of term from bidder post
providing 30 days cure period
No change in the RFP.
However, Cure period as
stated can be considered.
Payment will be made in phases after obtaining a “Letter
of satisfaction” and clearance for Payment from the
Dealing group. The Bidder must accept the payment
terms proposed by the Bank. The commercial bid
submitted by the Bidder must be in conformity with the
payment terms proposed by the Bank.
Bidder requests to allow the deviation on the payment
terms and bank to consider the payment terms proposed
by bidder at the time of submission of proposal.
No change in the RFP
Bidder requests the payment terms can be changed for
each module separately based on completion of
milestones as under:
After completion of Installation, Requirement Study and
other relevant installation/Master uploads - 25%
Completion of all Interface, Customization and
Development - 25%
Completion of User Acceptance Testing (including
resolution of all Issues, Complete Installation of DC and
DR setup and Training) -25%
Go Live (1st 20 % Monthly process run after Go live) -
20%
Resolution of Issues Raised up to 3 months after Go live-
5%
No change in the RFP
P4081
Payment terms:
After completion of Installation, Requirement Study and
other relevant installation/Master uploads - 15%
Completion of all Interface, Customization and
Development - 25%
Completion of User Acceptance Testing (including
resolution of all Issues, Complete Installation of DC and
DR setup and Training) -25%
Go Live (1st 20 % Monthly process run after Go live) -
20%
Resolution of Issues Raised up to 3 months after Go live -
15%
3.19
Page 19 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
We request to clarify that BANK shall remit payment to
Bidder within thirty (30) days following its receipt of
each invoice. Any invoice remaining unpaid after the
aforesaid period of thirty days shall be treated as a debt
owed by the BANK to the Bidder and the Bidder shall be,
without prejudice to any other remedies that it may
have in this regard, entitled to recover it as such with a
monthly interest of 2% calculated from the date the
payment became due until the recovery is made in full
with interest. Without prejudice to the other rights
available, Bidder also reserves the right to withhold the
provision of Services till such time all the payments due
to it under this Agreement have been made by BANK and
any such withholding by the Bidder shall not be treated
as breach by it of the provisions of this Agreement.
No change in the RFP
We request to clarify that the bid price shall be exclusive
of all applicable taxes, duties levies, VAT/Sales Tax/
Service Tax/Octroi. All taxes including any newly
introduced taxes shall be to the account of Bank. Any
increase or decrease in taxes shall be to the account of
Bank. Each party shall be responsible for its own income
tax.
Please be guided by the RFP
As per the various reference from RFP the bank is asking
bidder to quote price exclusive of taxes. The mentioned
clause from RFP is conflicting with the other clauses.
Hence in the final pricing provided by bidder will be
exclusive of taxes.
Can bank please clarify mentioned clause of bidder
clarifying the tax rates considered in pricing can be
removed.
Please be guided by the RFP
P4081
The fees payable by the Bank to Bidder shall be inclusive
of all costs such as insurance, taxes, custom duties,
levies, cess, transportation, installation, (collectively
referred to as “Taxes” but excluding Service tax and
octroi which will be paid on actual) that may be levied,
imposed, charged or incurred and the Bank shall pay the
fees due under this RFP and subsequent agreement
after deducting any tax deductible at source (TDS), as
applicable. The Bidder will need to provide the details
for the tax rates as considered in the pricing. This will be
used for subsequent tax changes.
3.19.2P4082
Payment terms:
After completion of Installation, Requirement Study and
other relevant installation/Master uploads - 15%
Completion of all Interface, Customization and
Development - 25%
Completion of User Acceptance Testing (including
resolution of all Issues, Complete Installation of DC and
DR setup and Training) -25%
Go Live (1st 20 % Monthly process run after Go live) -
20%
Resolution of Issues Raised up to 3 months after Go live -
15%
3.19
Page 20 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
83 P40 3.19.3 The Bidder has to submit the undisputed invoice along
with necessary signoff and acceptance documents from
the Bank, The Bank shall pay each undisputed invoice
raised in accordance with this RFP and subsequent
agreement, within thirty (30) Working Days after its
receipt unless otherwise mutually agreed in writing,
provided that such invoice is dated after such Fees have
become due and payable under this RFP and subsequent
agreement.
Bidder requests the payment to be due within 30 days
from the date of invoice provided by bidder.
No change in the RFP
We request to delete the following words ‘its directors,
employees, agents and representatives’. Also request to
delete the words ‘and or otherwise including but not
limited to those from third parties or liabilities of any
kind howsoever suffered, arising out of or incurred inter
alia during and after the Contract period including but
not limited to’ and replace it with the following words
‘arising out of’.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
Indemnity order as stated in section 4.6 does not specify
any amount? Can this clause be waived?
No change in the RFP
Indemnity 4.6P4584
Page 21 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Need to add the following standard exceptions and
exclusions to Bidder’s indemnity –
Bidder shall have no obligations with respect to any
infringement claims to the extent that the infringement
claim arises or results from: (i) Bidder’s compliance with
BANK’s specific technical designs or instructions; (ii)
inclusion in a deliverable of any content or other
materials provided by BANK and the infringement relates
to or arises from such BANK materials or provided
material; (iii) modification of a deliverable after delivery
by Bidder to BANK if such modification was not made by
or on behalf of the Bidder; (iv) operation or use of some
or all of the deliverable in combination with products,
information, specification, instructions, data, materials
not provided by Bidder; or (v) use of the deliverables for
any purposes for which the same have not been
designed or developed or other than in accordance with
any applicable specifications or documentation provided
under the applicable statement of work by the Bidder; or
(v) use of a superseded release of some or all of the
deliverables or BANK’s failure to use any modification of
the deliverable furnished under this Agreement
including, but not limited to, corrections, fixes, or
enhancements made available by the Bidder.
In the event that BANK is enjoined or otherwise
prohibited, or is reasonably likely to be enjoined or
otherwise prohibited, from using any deliverable as a
result of or in connection with any claim for which
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
Performance of the Contract shall be made by the
Bidder strictly in accordance with the time schedule
specified by the Bank. Time is the essence of Contract.
Proposes deletion of the clause since even a slight delay
might constitute material breach which may result in
termination of the contract. Further, there are remedies
which are already mentioned in the agreement for any
delay.
No change in the RFP
Indemnity 4.6P4584
4.8P4585
Page 22 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
A delay by the Bidder in the performance of its
Contractual obligations, which the Bank in its sole
discretion may adjudge, shall render the Bidder liable to
any or all the following sanctions:
i. Forfeiture of its Performance Bank
Guarantee/Performance Security
ii. Imposition of liquidated damages/penalty, and/or
iii. Termination of the Contract for default
If, at any time during performance of the Contract, the
Bidder encounter conditions impeding timely
completion of the Service(s) under the Contract and
performance of Service(s), the Bidder shall promptly
notify the Bank in writing of the fact of the delay, its
likely duration and its causes. As soon as practicable
after receipt of the Bidder’s notice, the Bank shall
evaluate the situation and may at its sole discretion
extend the Bidder's time for performance.
We request to delete the following words ‘which the
Bank in its sole discretion may adjudge’ as the same will
be subjective in nature. We request to clarify that the
Bidder shall be liable sanctions only if the delay is due to
reasons solely and entirely attributable to the failure of
the Bidder. Hence we request to modify the clause
accordingly.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
4.8P4585
Page 23 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
86 P46 4.9 User Acceptance Test and Quality Check
a) The User Acceptance Tests, which shall involve testing
of the entire setup including the hardware, and its
integration with application software and within the
time limit prescribed by the Bank with live and test data
shall be conducted by Bidder at the locations prescribed
by the Bank. The User Acceptance Test must be
completed to the satisfaction of the Bank, within a time
frame specified by the Bank. Time being the essence of
the Contract.
b) The Bank reserves the right to evolve a procedure of
Quality Checking to ensure that the hardware is
according to the prescribed specifications and
standards.
c) Nothing stated herein above shall in any way release
or discharge the Bidder from any warranty or other
obligations / liabilities under and in accordance with the
Contract.
d) On successful completion of acceptability test, receipt
of deliverables, etc, and after the Bank (which shall not
be deemed to be an obligation on the Bank) is satisfied;
the Completion Certificate in the format given in
Annexure-6 will be issued by the Bank. The date on
which such certificate is signed shall be deemed to be
the date of successful Commissioning of the System.
We request to delete the following words from 4.9 (a) &
(d) ‘satisfaction of the Bank’ and ‘ Bank is satisfied’
respectively as the same is subjective in nature and
request to substitute it with the words ‘as per mutually
agreed terms and conditions under the contract’.
We need to add a clause on to state that the deliverables
shall be deemed to have been accepted if Bank does not
notify acceptance with agreed period for acceptance on
completion of acceptance test or starts using the
deliverable in live environment before giving such
acceptance.
No change in the RFP
87 P46 4.10 Manuals
a) The Bidder must supply all relevant manuals for the
application installed. The manuals shall be in English.
b) Unless and otherwise agreed, the implementation
shall not be considered to be completely delivered for
the purpose of taking over, until such manuals as may
be necessary are provided to the Bank.
c) System manuals should include the specifications of
the applications implemented.
We request to clarify that all manual provided by the
Bidder shall be provided to the Bank in soft copy form
only.
OK
Page 24 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
We request to remove the following words from this
paragraph ‘In case, the Bidder/Successful Bidder fails to
appoint its arbitrator or any conflict in the appointment
of the arbitrator, sole arbitrator appointed by the Bank
will arbitrate the matter and decision of such arbitrator
shall be binding on the parties’ since it is not acceptable
to have a sole arbitrator appointed by the Bank as the
sole deciding authority. Hence please modify this clause.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
We request to clarify that the Bidder shall continue to
provide services pending resolution of disputes provided
the all payments due under the contract have been paid
by the Bank.
No change in the RFP
89 P47 4.13 Survival
Any provision of the Contract which, either expressly or
by implication, survive the termination or expiry of the
Contract, shall be complied with by the Parties including
that of the provisions of arbitration, indemnity,
confidentiality, non-disclosure in the same manner as if
the present Contract is valid, subsisting and in full force
and effect.
The provisions of the clauses of the Contract in relation
to Documents, data, processes, property, Intellectual
Property Rights, indemnity, publicity and confidentiality
and ownership survive the expiry or termination of the
Contract/Agreement and in relation to confidentiality,
the obligations continue to apply unless the Bank
notifies the Bidder of its release from those obligations.
We request to delete the words ‘confidentiality, non-
disclosure’ from Para 1 & 2 as it is not acceptable to
have the confidentiality/non-disclosure obligations
under the contract valid and subsisting for a perpetual
period of time. Hence request to modify the clause
accordingly.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
88 P46 4.11 Resolution of Disputes
The Successful Bidder shall not be entitled to suspend
the Service(s) or the completion of the job, pending
resolution of any disputes between the Parties and shall
continue, at the sole discretion of the Bank, to render
the Service(s) in accordance with the provisions of the
Contract notwithstanding the existence of any dispute
between the Parties or the subsistence of any
arbitration or other proceedings.
Page 25 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
90 P48 4.15 No Set-off, counter-claim and cross claims.
In case the Successful Bidder has any other business
relationship with the Bank, no right of set-off, counter-
claim and cross-claim and/or otherwise will be available
under this RFP/the Contract to the Successful Bidder for
any payments receivable under and in accordance with
that business.
We request to make this clause mutually applicable to
both parties.
No change in the RFP
91 P48 4.18 Contract Period Pl validate that total contract period is 6 months from go-
live of last module
Please be guided by the RFP
We request to delete the word ‘induce’ from the first
sentence.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
We request to delete the following words from sub-
clause (g) ‘and shall keep the Bank, its directors, officers,
employees, representatives, consultants and agents
indemnified in relation thereto’ as the same is not
acceptable to the Bidder.
No change in the RFP
b) That the Bidder is not involved in any major litigation
and no litigation or investigation is threatened against
the Bidder. That the existing or threatened litigations or
investigations do not have an impact of affecting or
compromising the performance and delivery of
Service(s)/Systems under the Contract.
We request to make sub-clause (o) mutually applicable
to both parties.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
Representations and Warranties
In order to induce the Bank to enter into the Contract,
the Bidder hereby represents and warrants as of the
date hereof, which representations and warranties shall
survive the term and termination hereof, the following:
4.19P4892
Page 26 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
d) That the Bidder has the requisite professional skills,
personnel and resources/authorizations that are
necessary for providing / rendering all such Service(s) as
are necessary to perform its obligations under the Bid
and this RFP/the Contract
We request to add standard exceptions and exclusions
to the warranty under sub-clause (p) as follows-
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
h) That all the representations and warranties as have
been made by the Bidder with respect to its bid and
Contract, are true and accurate, and shall continue to
remain true and accurate through the term of the
Contract.
EXCEPT AS SET FORTH IN THIS SECTION, BIDDER MAKES
NO WARRANTIES TO BANK, EXPRESS OR IMPLIED, WITH
RESPECT TO ANY SERVICES OR DELIVERABLES PROVIDED
HEREUNDER OR UNDER ANY STATEMENT OF WORK,
INCLUDING, WITHOUT LIMITATION, ANY IMPLIED
WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY OR FITNESS FOR A
PARTICULAR PURPOSE. ALL SUCH OTHER WARRANTIES
ARE HEREBY DISCLAIMED BY THE BIDDER.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
j) That there are – (a) no legal proceedings pending or
threatened against Bidder or any sub Bidder/third party
or its team which adversely affect/may affect
performance under this RFP/the Contract; and (b) no
inquiries or investigations have been threatened,
commenced or pending against the Bidder or any sub-
Bidder / third party or its team members by any
statutory or regulatory or investigative agencies.
We request to delete the words ‘its directors, officers,
employees, agents, representatives and consultants’
from sub-clause (p) of this section as the same is not
acceptable to the Bidder.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
l) That all the conditions precedent under the Contract
has been complied.
We request to add a provision for the Bank’s warranty as
follows –
No change in the RFP.
4.19P4892
Page 27 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
n) That the Bidder certifies that all registrations,
recordings, filings and notarizations of the Contract and
all payments of any tax or duty, including without
limitation stamp duty, registration charges or similar
amounts which are required to be effected or made by
the Bidder which is necessary to ensure the legality,
validity, enforceability or admissibility in evidence of the
Contract have been made.
The BANK warrants that all software, information, data,
materials, and other assistance (“BANK materials”)
provided by it to the Bidder will not infringe the
intellectual property rights of any third parties. Further,
the BANK has the rights and is otherwise authorized to
deliver the BANK Material and to grant the rights and
licenses to the Bidder as contemplated in this agreement
or in the relevant statement of work.
No change in the RFP.
o) That the Bidder confirms that there has not and shall
not occur any execution, amendment or modification of
any agreement/contract without the prior written
consent of the Bank, which may directly or indirectly
have a bearing on the Contract or Service(s).
We request to make sub-clause (o) mutually applicable
to both parties.
No change in the RFP.
4.19P4892
Page 28 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
p) That the Bidder owns, has license to use or otherwise
has the right to use, free of any pending or threatened
liens or other security or other interests all Intellectual
Property Rights, which are required or desirable for the
Service(s) and the Bidder does not, in carrying on its
business and operations, infringe any Intellectual
Property Rights of any person. None of the Intellectual
Property or Intellectual Property Rights owned or
enjoyed by the Bidder or which the Bidder is licensed to
use, which are material in the context of the Bidder’s
business and operations are being infringed nor, there is
any infringement or threatened infringement of those
Intellectual Property or Intellectual Property Rights
licensed or provided to the Bidder by any person. All
Intellectual Property Rights (owned by the Bidder or
which the Bidder is licensed to use) are valid and
subsisting. All actions (including registration, payment of
all registration and renewal fees) required to maintain
the same in full force and effect have been taken
thereon and shall keep the Bank, its directors, officers,
employees, agents, representatives and consultants
indemnified in relation thereto.
This non-infringement warranty shall not apply to the
extent that an infringement claim arises as a result of (a)
use of the deliverable other than in accordance with any
applicable specifications or documentation relating to
the deliverable provided under the applicable statement
of work, (b) modification or alteration of the deliverable
made after the delivery by Bidder to BANK if such
modification or alteration was not made by or on behalf
of the Bidder, (c) use of the deliverable in combination
with other products or systems not reasonably
anticipated in the specifications, or (d) infringement
arising from components or materials provided to Bidder
by or on behalf of BANK in connection with the
development of the deliverable.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
93 P51 4.20.d to treat Confidential Information as confidential for a
period of [five (5)] years from the date of receipt. In the
event of earlier termination of the Contract/Agreement,
the Parties hereby agree to maintain the confidentiality
of the Confidential Information for a further period of
five (5) years from the date of such termination.
We request to clarify that parties shall treat Confidential
Information as confidential during the term of the
agreement and for a period of 2 years thereafter.
Please be guided by the RFP
Confidential Information in oral form must be identified
as confidential at the time of disclosure and confirmed
as such in writing within 30 (thirty) days of such
disclosure. Confidential Information does not include
information which:
We request to clarify that oral or visual information shall
be reduced in writing by the disclosing party within
seven (7) days of its disclosure.
Please be guided by the RFP
4.19P4892
4.20.1P5194
Page 29 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the Parties acknowledge
that the nature of the Service(s) to be performed under
this RFP/the Contract may require the Bidder's
personnel to be present on premises of the Bank or may
require the Bidder's personnel to have access to
computer networks and databases of the Bank while on
or off-premises of the Bank. It is understood that it
would be impractical for the Bank to monitor all
information made available to the Bidder under such
circumstances and to provide notice to the Bidder of the
confidentiality of all such information. Therefore, the
Bidder agrees that any technical or business or other
information of the Bank that the Bidder’s personnel, sub
Bidders, or agents acquire while on the Bank's premises,
or through access to the Bank's computer systems or
databases while on or off the Bank's premises, shall be
deemed Confidential Information.
We request to delete this provision as deemed
confidential information is not acceptable to the Bidder
as confidential information needs to be clearly marked
and identified in writing by the disclosing party.
No change in the RFP
The provision of this clause shall survive termination of
the Contract till such Confidential Information enters
public domain or as stated above.
Request to please refer to our earlier comment on the
term of confidential obligation and incorporate the same
under this clause.
No change in the RFP
95 P52 4.21.1 Termination for Insolvency
The Bank may at any time terminate the Contract by
giving written notice of 30 days to the Successful Bidder,
indicating its intention of termination the
Contract/Agreement without compensation to the
Successful Bidder, if the Successful Bidder becomes
bankrupt or otherwise insolvent, provided that such
termination will not prejudice or affect any right of
action or remedy which has accrued or will accrue
thereafter to the Bank.
We request to delete the following words ‘without
compensation to the Successful Bidder’ and substitute it
with the following words ‘the Bidder shall be entitled to
receive payments for all services and deliverables
rendered upto the date of termination.’
We request to make this clause mutually applicable to
both parties.
No change in the RFP
4.20.1P5194
Page 30 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
We request to modify this clause to state that the Bank
shall terminate the contract only if the failure is due to
reasons solely and entirely attributable to the default of
the Bidder and by providing a cure period of thirty (30)
days written notice to the Bidder to rectify its default.
We request to add a provision for the right of
termination to the Bidder for default by the Bank of its
obligations under the contract.
Bank will accept Termination
for Default if entire failure is
attributable to the bidder and
Cure period as stated can be
considered.
Any termination should happen only for material breach
remaining uncured even after providing a cure period of
60 days by the Purchaser . Further, upon such
termination the Bidder will be entitled to receive
payments for the products and services provided till
effective date of termination, including any termination
charges as mutually agreed.
Bank will accept Termination
for Default if entire failure is
attributable to the bidder and
Cure period as stated can be
considered.
Bidder proposes the contract can be termination in case
of material breach of default and not for any breach,
also bank to provide 30 days cure period to provide
remedy to the failure prior to exercise such termination
right
In case of any termination bank shall pay for all the
services and products delivered to the effective date of
termination and termination fees proposed by bidder
No change in the RFP.
However, Cure period as
stated can be considered.
Termination for Default
The Bank, without prejudice to any other right or
remedy for breach of the terms and conditions of this
RFP/the Contract, by a written notice of default sent to
the Bidder, may terminate the Contract in whole or in
part.
4.21.2P5296
Page 31 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
97 P52 4.21.3 Termination for other than Default
The Bank, without prejudice to any other right or
remedy and without assigning any reason, may at its
sole discretion, serve upon the Successful Bidder a
written notice of 30 (thirty) days, indicating its intention
to terminate the Contract/Agreement and may
terminate the Contract/Agreement in whole or in part.
We request to modify the provision to state that a
advance written notice of 90 days be provided to the
Bidder and make provision for compensation to the
Bidder in case of termination for convenience by the
Bank. Also Bidder shall be entitled to receive payments
for all services/deliverables rendered upto the date of
termination and work in progress cost, as well as a
reasonable compensation towards its prior
commitments.
Will be discussed with the
successful bidder
We request to state that this is a repetition of the clause
4.21.3 above and hence request to delete the same in
order to avoid any duplication of the same clause.
No change in the RFP.
Since the contract duration is one year bidder request
the removal of termination of convenience and
termination for other than default provision
No change in the RFP.
We request to delete this provision as the same is not
acceptable to the Bidder.
No change in the clause,
except in the event of
Termination for convenience
We request for deletion of this clause. No change in the clause,
except in the event of
Termination for convenience
100 P54 4.22.i Publicity: The Bidder shall not make or permit to be
made a public announcement or media release about
any aspect of the Contract unless the Bank gives the
Bidder its prior written consent.
We request to make this clause mutually applicable to
both parties.
No change in the RFP.
101 P54 4.24 No Assignment
The Contract cannot be transferred or assigned by the
Successful Bidder without the prior written approval of
IDBI Bank.
We request to make this clause mutually applicable to
both parties.
No change in the RFP.
Termination for Convenience
Notwithstanding the provisions of the Contract and/or
the Bid Documents the Bank, by written notice sent to
the Bidder, may terminate the Contract, in whole or in
part, at any time for its convenience. The notice of
termination shall specify that termination is for Bank’s
convenience, the extent to which performance of the
Bidder under and in accordance with the Contract is
4.21.4P5398
99 P54 4.22.f In the event of termination of this RFP/the Contract for
any reason whatsoever, the Bank shall have the right to
publicize such termination to caution the
customers/public from dealing with the Successful
Bidder.
Page 32 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
102 P54 4.25 Entire Contract
The terms and conditions laid down in this RFP and all
annexure thereto shall be read in consonance with and
form an integral part of the Contract. The Contract shall
supersede any prior Contract, understanding or
representation of the Parties on the subject matter.
We request to add the following –
Each party acknowledges that it has not relied on or
been induced to enter into this Contract by a
representation or warranty other than those expressly
set out in this Contract. To the extent permitted by
applicable law, a party is not liable to another party in
contract or tort or in any other way for a representation
or warranty that is not set out in this Contract.
No change in the RFP.
We request to clarify that payments shall be suspended
by the Bank only if the failure is due to reasons solely
and entirely attributable to the default of the Bidder and
by providing a cure period of thirty (30) days written
notice to the Bidder to rectify/repair before any such
suspension.
Bank will accept Termination
for Default if entire failure is
attributable to the bidder and
Cure period as stated can be
considered.
Bidder requests to remove the clause as the invoices will
be raised post completion of milestones
No change in the RFP.
104 P55 4.29.a Any upward revisions and/or additions of quantities,
specifications, charts, etc., of the Bid Documents
required to be made during execution of the work shall
not constitute a change order and shall be carried out
without a change order as forming part of the Services
agreed hereunder and shall be carried out without any
time and cost effect to the Bank
We request to pl modify this open ended clause to
indicate that any upward revision/addition will be
handled through suitable change management process
laid down at the beginning of the project with
involvement of both teams
No change in the RFP
Suspension of Payment to the Bidder
The Bank may by a written notice of suspension,
suspend all payments to the Successful Bidder under the
Contract, if the Successful Bidder failed to perform any
of its obligations under the RFP/Contract, (including the
carrying out of the Service(s)) provided that such notice
of suspension:
i. Shall specify the nature of the failure and
ii. Shall request the Successful Bidder to remedy such
failure within a specified period from the date of issue of
4.28P55103
Page 33 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
105 P55 4.29.b & c b) Purchaser may, at any time, by a written order given
to the Bidder, make changes within the general scope of
the Contract in any one or more of the following:
i. Functional specification
ii. The Services to be provided by the Bidder
c) If any such change causes an increase or decrease in
the cost of, or the time required for the Bidder’s
performance or observance of any provisions under the
Contract, an equitable adjustment shall be made in the
Contract price or delivery schedule, or both, and the
Contract shall accordingly be amended as may be
decided by the Bank. Any claims by the Bidder for
adjustment under this clause must be asserted within 30
(thirty) days from the date of knowledge of the Bank’s
change order by the Bidder.
We request to clarify the parties shall mutually agree in
writing the changes to the scope of work under this
Contract and hence request to accordingly modify this
clause.
No change in the RFP.
106 P56 4.29.g If there is a difference of opinion between the Bidder
and the Bank whether a particular work or part of the
work constitutes a change order or not, the decision of
the Bank shall be final, conclusive and binding on the
Bidder.
We request to delete this clause as the same is not
acceptable to the Bidder.
No change in the RFP.
Page 34 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
107 P56 4.30 Liquidated Damages
a) If the Bidder fails to deliver the services as per this
RFP within the time period(s) specified in the Contract,
the Bank shall, without prejudice to its other rights and
remedies under and in accordance with the Contract,
deduct from the Contract price, as liquidated damages,
a sum equivalent to 1% percent per week or part
thereof of respective order cost subject to maximum
deduction of 5% of the order value of the delayed
services. In case of undue delay beyond a period of 15
days unless otherwise waived by the Bank, the Bank in
its discretion may consider termination of the Contract.
b) If the Bidder fails to complete the entire work before
the scheduled completion date or the extended date or
if Bidder repudiates the Contract before completion of
the Services, the Bank may without prejudice to any
other right or remedy available to the Bank as under the
Contract recover from the Bidder, as ascertained and
agreed liquidated damages and not by way of penalty:
c) The Purchaser may without prejudice to its right to
effect recovery by any other method, deduct the
amount of liquidated damages from any money
belonging to the Bidder in its hands (which includes the
Bank’s right to claim such amount against Bidder’s Bank
Guarantee) or which may become due to the Bidder.
Any such recovery or liquidated damages shall not in any
We request to clarify that liquidated damages shall be a
sum equivalent to 0.5% per week of delay of the value of
the delayed deliverables up to the maximum of 5% of
the value of the delayed deliverables. We request to
clarify that liquidated damages will be levied only if the
failure is solely and entirely attributable to the failure of
the contractor. We request to state that this shall be the
exclusive remedy of the Bank and sole obligation of the
contractor. Hence we request to modify the clause
accordingly.
No change in the RFP
108 P59 4.39.b The Bank shall reserve the sole right to grant any
extension to the term above mentioned and shall notify
in writing to the Bidder, at least three months before
the expiration of the term hereof, whether it will grant
the Bidder an extension of the term. The decision to
grant or refuse the extension shall be at the discretion of
Bank.
Any such extension will be based on mutual discussion
and agreement between the parties.
No change in the RFP
Page 35 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
109 P60 5 Section 5: SERVICE LEVEL REQUIREMENTS We request to insert the following standard uptime
exclusions –
The time lost due to any of the following reasons shall be
taken into account while calculating the availability/
uptime requirement: (a) Time lost due to power or
environmental failures; (b) Time taken to recover the
system because of power or environmental failures; (c)
Time lost due to damage or malfunction in the system or
any units thereof due to causes attributable to Bank such
as attachment of additional devices, making alteration to
the system, maintenance of the system, etc. without
Bidder’s consent and/ or failure to maintain the site as
required by the Bidder; (d) Time taken for scheduled
maintenance/ troubleshooting either for preventive
purposes or improvement in function or other purposes;
(e) Time taken for reconfiguration or other planned
downtime situations; (f) Scheduled shutdowns as
required by Bank; (Bidder may also request Bank for a
shutdown for maintenance purpose, which request will
not be denied unreasonably by Bank); (g) Time taken for
booting the system (h) Time lost due to unavailability of
links.
No change in the RFP
Sec 3.12.4 mentions 'Bidder will provide post production
support of one techno-functional analyst for 90 days
from Go-live date at on-site and thereafter off-site
support for further 3 months thereafter'. Pl clarify we
need to quote for only three month post go-live or for
three more months off-site thereafter
Please be guided by the RFP
Please confirm that the post implementation support of
upto 3 months will be from the Go Live date of the last
module
Please be guided by the RFP
Post Implementation Support up to 3 months from Go
Live of the last Module
Annexure2P67110
Page 36 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Separate line item for cost of OEM in the
implementation
The Cost of including the OEM in the overall
implementaiton, support and sustenance should be
representated as a separate line item in the commercial
Bid form given in Annexure 2
Please refer to corrigendum
published on Bank's web-site
with regards to TCO.
DC and DRC Does the Bank require installation of Applications in 3
environments viz. Test, Production and DR environment?
Only in 2 environments i.e.
Test and Production
Cost quoted for Sl No. 4 will be considered as part of
TCO for evaluation. However, the Bank may, at its
discretion, choose/opt either to implement or not as per
its requirement during the period of contract
If LRM module is not to be implemented, would scope
mentioned under sec 3.2.3.4 be not applicable. In case of
LRM module not getting implemented, pl clarify scope
on liquidity risk management to be customised in ALM
module
Please be guided by the RFP
Not to be submitted as part of RFP response. Please
confirm.
Not to be submitted along
with the response. It is
applicable only to the
Successful Bidder.
We request to include the following –
(h) Any corrigendum/clarification issued by the Bank;
(g) Deviations proposed by the Bidder.
No change in the RFP
To be completed if selected for the project. Please
confirm
It is applicable only to the
Successful Bidder.
We request to delete the words’ The Bank shall be the
sole judge to decide’ as the same is subjective in nature
and substitute the same with the following ‘As per
agreed specifications under the Contract’.
No change in the RFP
Annexure2P67110
Contract FormAnnexure4P70111
Performance Security / Performance Bank Guarantee
Form
The Bank shall be the sole judge to decide whether the
Vendor has failed to perform and/or observe the terms
of the Contract of the said document for providing the
Services by the Vendor to the Bank, and on account of
the said failure what amount has become payable by the
Vendor to the Bank under this Guarantee.
Annexure5P72112
Page 37 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
We request to add the following –
This Bank Guarantee issued by
____________________Bank, on behalf of Tata
Consultancy Services Limited /Bidder /in favor of
_____________________________Bank is in respect of a
new Contract / extension of Contract
dated________________.
As communicated by Tata Consultancy Services Limited
/Bidder, on the date of execution of this Bank
Guarantee an amount of Rupees ______________
(Rupees ______________________________ only) is
outstanding and payable to Tata Consultancy Services
Limited /Bidder by
_____________________________Bank, in respect of
pervious contracts between Tata Consultancy Services
Limited /Bidder and
_____________________________Bank.
Notwithstanding anything contained hereinabove:
a) Our liability under this Bank Guarantee shall not
exceed and is restricted to Rs._______________ (Rupees
_______________________________ only)
b) This Guarantee shall remain in force up to and
including _________ (including claim period of three
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
113 P75 Annexure6 Completion Certificate Not to be submitted as part of RFP response. Please
confirm.
Not to be submitted along
with the response. It is
applicable only to the
Successful Bidder.
We request to delete this annexure as the same is not
acceptable to the bidder. We request to clarify that
terms and conditions of this RFP shall be subject to the
deviations proposed by the Bidder.
No change in the RFP
Performance Security / Performance Bank Guarantee
Form
The Bank shall be the sole judge to decide whether the
Vendor has failed to perform and/or observe the terms
of the Contract of the said document for providing the
Services by the Vendor to the Bank, and on account of
the said failure what amount has become payable by the
Vendor to the Bank under this Guarantee.
Annexure5P72112
Unconditional Acceptance of Terms and Conditions of
RFP
Annexure7P76114
Page 38 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
We request to delete this annexure as the same is not
acceptable to the bidder. We request to clarify that
terms and conditions of this RFP shall be subject to the
deviations proposed by the Bidder.
No change in the RFP
We request to modify this clause to include that the
deviations proposed by the Bidder shall form integral
part of Bidder's proposal.
We also understand that upon downselection the terms
and conditions of the governing contract will be mutually
discussed and agreed between the parties.
No change in the RFP
Bidder request to consider bidders proposal with the
deviation proposed to RFP terms
No change in the RFP
Non-Disclosure Agreement
d)treat Confidential Information as confidential for a
period of five (5) years from the date of receipt. In the
event of earlier termination of this RFP/the Contract,
the Parties hereby agree to maintain the confidentiality
of the Confidential Information for a further period of
[two (2)] years from the date of such termination.
We request to clarify that parties shall treat Confidential
Information as confidential during the term of the
agreement and for a period of 2 years thereafter.
No change in the RFP
Confidential Information in oral form must be identified
as confidential at the time of disclosure and confirmed
as such in writing within 30 days of such disclosure.
We request to clarify that oral or visual information shall
be reduced in writing by the disclosing party within
seven (7) days of its disclosure.
Please be guided by the RFP
Unconditional Acceptance of Terms and Conditions of
RFP
Annexure7P76114
Annexure8P78115
Page 39 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Notwithstanding the foregoing, the parties acknowledge
that the nature of the Services to be performed under
this RFP/the Contract may require the Bidder’s
personnel to be present on premises of Bank or may
require the Bidder’s personnel to have access to
computer networks and databases of Bank while on or
off premises of Bank. It is understood that it would be
impractical for Bank to monitor all information made
available to the Bidder’s personnel under such
circumstances and to provide notice to the Bidder of the
confidentiality of all such information. Therefore, the
Bidder agrees and undertakes that any technical or
business or other information of Bank that the Bidder’s
personnel, or agents acquire while on Bank premises, or
through access to Bank computer systems or databases
while on or off Bank premises, shall be deemed
Confidential Information.
We request to delete this provision as deemed
confidential information is not acceptable to the Bidder
as confidential information needs to be clearly marked
and identified in writing by the disclosing party.
No change in the RFP
The provisions hereunder shall survive termination of
the Contract.
Request to please refer to our earlier comment on the
term of confidential obligation and incorporate the same
under this clause.
No change in the RFP
Not to be submitted as part of RFP response. Please
confirm.
Not to be submitted along
with the response. It is
applicable only to the
Successful Bidder.
We request to please refer to our earlier comment on
Indemnity section and request to incorporate the same
under this Annexure as well.
No change in the RFP
Annexure8P78115
Deed of IndemnityAnnexure9P80116
Page 40 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
The word “indemnify” should be replaced with “defend
or settle”.
The Indemnity clause need to be a mutual/either party
clause.
Further, we request that the indemnity related
obligation be limited to third party claim for bodily injury
(including death) and IPR indemnification only. IPR
Indemnity shall not be applicable for any claim or action
due to any changes by the Bank or third party or use of
product in a manner other than specified in product
manual or specification or any claim due to use of
product with any other products. We also request that
the indemnification shall be mutual and both parties
shall indemnify each other in relation to claims identified
above. The clause shall be reworded.
The RFP does not provide the process of indemnification.
We suggest the following process shall be applicable for
Indemnification under this agreement and the clause for
indemnification shall be replaced with following clauses:
Both Vendor and Mother Dairy agrees to indemnify each
other for any third party claim for bodily injury and
death and any claim of infringement of IPR violation
(including patent, copyright, design right, trademark)
subject to process of indemnification suggested below.
Indemnified Party shall mean party that is being
indemnified and Indemnifying Parties shall mean party
that indemnifies.
a) the Indemnified Party shall as promptly as practicable,
No change in the RFP
Format for Evaluation of Eligibility Criteria Has Oracle agreed to this clause? No change in the RFP
Bidder should be a Corporate and registered body in
India with a
minimum turnover of Rs. 20 crores for the last financial
year
We are a Limited Liability Partnership (LLP). Please
confirm LLPs are eligible
OK
Does a verbal reference call or a reference note from the
other “scheduled commercial Bank” suffice as proof of
work ?
No change in the RFP
Deed of IndemnityAnnexure9P80116
Annexure
12
P86117
The applicant bidder should have two of the three
proposed solutions (ALM, FTP and PM) implemented or
under implementation in minimum one scheduled
commercial bank in India. Bank means a Scheduled
Commercial Bank in India having at least 300 branches
as on the date of RFP. The said implementations should
have commenced within Four previous years from the
date of this RFP. Necessary documents are to be
submitted with the bid. Page 41 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Please clarify the meaning of proposed solution. We
request you to keep it as OFSA implementation as there
are very few OFSAA implementations in India most of
the prospective bidders having capability of delivering
the project will not be eligible to bid.
No change in the RFP
Request the bank to also consider large Industrial
Development Bank in India with 100 branches
No change in the RFP
Request the bank to amend the caluse as follows "The
said implementations should have commenced within
Five previous years from the date of this RFP".
No change in the RFP
The Bidder should have trained manpower and expertise
with experience in OFSAA implementation for any Bank
in India with at least one resource having experience in
implementation of OFSAA 6.x project to execute the
modules being implemented.
What is the cutoff resource count for a successful
bidder? Does experience in implementing OFSAA 6.x FTP
&PFT modules qualify a bidder ?
Please refer Annexure 14 for
Credentials with regard to
experience in OFSAA 6.x
Teaming Agreement with OEM is mandatory and as per
role of OEM defined in the RFP
Clause 1.6.5: (Pg 12 )
All prospective Bidders shall furnish a teaming
agreement with OEM (Oracle Financial Services
Software Limited) for the “OEM Role in the Project”
mentioned in this RFP and submit the same as part of
the bid document.
What should be the format of this teaming agreement
document and what are the essential contents required
by the Bank in this document ?
As per the scope of the work
defined in the RFP
Bidder should have been in the business in India for the
last five
years.
Document required -
Self-Declaration and order
copy
What documents need to be submitted for this. Please be guided by the RFP
Annexure
12
P86117
The applicant bidder should have two of the three
proposed solutions (ALM, FTP and PM) implemented or
under implementation in minimum one scheduled
commercial bank in India. Bank means a Scheduled
Commercial Bank in India having at least 300 branches
as on the date of RFP. The said implementations should
have commenced within Four previous years from the
date of this RFP. Necessary documents are to be
submitted with the bid.
Annexure
13
P87118
Page 42 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Teaming Agreement with OEM as per role defined in the
RFP
Request you to drop teaming requirement with OEM.
We wish to submit a bid on our own without any
partner/teaming/consortium. We have adequate
experience and resources required for the
implementation of the project and hence donot need
external help. We request you to kindly note that the
OEM has not implemented version 6.x in India yet.
Further all implementations of OFSAA in India since
version 5.x are being done by service providers
independant of the OEM.
No change in the RFP
Does extensive work experience on OFSAA frameworks
used by ALM solution ( such as ; Reconciliation, rate
management, cashflow engine etc ) qualify a bidder ?
Please be guided by the RFP
Annexure
13
P87118
Technical Bid Evaluation CriteriaAnnexure
14
P88119
Page 43 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Towards a more relevant evaluation, we propose
following criteria
- Should have implemented or under process of
implementation OFSAA 6.x ALM for Banks in India - 10
marks
- Should have implemented or under process of
implementation OFSAA 6.x FTP for Banks in India - 10
marks
- Should have implemented or under process of
implementation OFSAA 6.x PM for Banks in India - 10
marks
- Should have implemented or under implementation
experience of OFSAA 6.x ALM-FTP-PM modules for a
single Bank in India - 10 marks
- Should have implemented or under implementation
experience of migrating OFSA 4.5 to OFSAA 6.x ALM-FTP-
PM modules for a single Bank - 10 marks
- Should have implementation experience of OFSA 4.5
ALM-FTP-PM modules for a single Bank in India.
Minimum UAT should have been completed on all
modules - 10 marks
- bidder should have a pool of resources who should
have worked in at least 1 Bank with at least one resource
having experience in implementation of OFSA 4.5 - Max.
10 marks on 10 or more resources with 1 mark on each
resource
- bidder should have a pool of resources who should
have worked in at least 1 Bank on migration project from
No change in the RFP
We request the bank to consider experience of the
bidder if the implementation has been subcontracted to
the bidder and proof to that effect by way of experience
certificate from end client is provided by the bidder. This
is essential so that the bidder who has the experience
and capability gets the marks.
Please refer to corrigendum
published on Bank's web-site
with regards to Annexure 14
(Note)
Technical Bid Evaluation CriteriaAnnexure
14
P88119
Page 44 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
We request the bank to clarify how the process would
treat experience of bidders when two bidders give the
same client reference such that one bidder (bidder 1)
has bid for that client RFP as prime bidder and other
bidder (bidder 2) has been a consortium partner to
bidder 1 and thus the work has been sub contracted by
bidder 1 to bidder 2.
Please refer to corrigendum
published on Bank's web-site
with regards to Annexure 14
(Note)
We request the bank to clarify how the process would
treat experience of bidders when two bidders give the
same client reference when one bidder (bidder 1) has
bid for that client RFP as prime bidder and has
subcontracted the work to other bidder (bidder 2)
without having (bidder 2) as a part of the bidding
consortium for that specific client RFP
Please refer to corrigendum
published on Bank's web-site
with regards to Annexure 14
(Note)
The 5 criteria making up for the 60 marks of credentials
are not giving any emphasis of the bidder on
implementing OFSAA 6.x version. Hence we request that
marks be given only for 6.x version experience.
No change in the RFP
Considering the fact that there are very few 6.x version
implementations in India we request that for each of
the 5 criteria making up for 60 marks of credentials full
marks be given for 1 implementation / under
implementation reference of version 6.x
No change in the RFP
Technical Bid Evaluation CriteriaAnnexure
14
P88119
Page 45 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
We have observed that the purchase orders are issued
to SI entities (from end to end consideration including
hardware) but the actual implemenation for OFSAA is
often sub contracted to third party. In some cases
consortiums are also formed.
We feel that having the right resources who have done
the implementation are important for your project.
Hence the consideration that entities that have actually
executed and have the right resources should be
considered.
Request that subcontractor or consortium members be
considered for credentials scoring
Please refer to corrigendum
published on Bank's web-site
with regards to Annexure 14
(Note)
Credential scoring Following are the observations. The technical scoring has
very high weightage for credentials. 60% are for
credentials which are for OFSAA implementations in
India. Very few players have OFSAA implementations
and other capable players will not reach tech
qualification. Hence we suggest following change. The
credential score should not be more than 10% of tech
score and within that OFSA implementations should be
taken into consideration as that experience is also
relevant.
Please be guided by the RFP
We request to clarify that any third party software
and/or hardware shall be governed by the terms and
conditions signed between OEM and the Bank.
Please be guided by the RFP
We request to clarify that terms and conditions of this
RFP shall be subject to the deviations proposed by the
Please be guided by the RFP--120
Technical Bid Evaluation CriteriaAnnexure
14
P88119
General comment--
Page 46 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Limitation of Liability We request to add the following clause–
Bidder shall be excused and not be liable or responsible
for any delay or failure to perform the services or failure
of the services or a deliverable under this Agreement, to
the extent that such delay or failure has arisen as a result
of any delay or failure by the BANK or its employees or
agents or third party service providers to perform any of
its duties and obligations as set out in this Agreement. In
the event that Bidder is delayed or prevented from
performing its obligations due to such failure or delay on
the part of or on behalf of the BANK, then Bidder shall
be allowed an additional period of time to perform its
obligations and unless otherwise agreed the additional
period shall be equal to the amount of time for which
Bidder is delayed or prevented from performing its
obligations due to such failure or delay on the part of or
on behalf of the BANK. Such failures or delays shall be
brought to the notice of the BANK and subject to mutual
agreement with the BANK, then Bidder shall take such
actions as may be necessary to correct or remedy the
failures or delays. Bidder shall be entitled to invoice the
BANK for additional costs incurred in connection with
correction or remedy as above at time & material rate
card as agreed upon between the parties.
Neither party shall be liable to the other for any special,
indirect, incidental, consequential (including loss of
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
Additional
Clauses
-121
Page 47 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Intellectual Property Rights Request to insert the following provisions –
BANK acknowledges and agrees that this is a
professional services agreement and this agreement is
not intended to be used for licensing of any Bidder’s
proprietary software or tools. If Bidder and BANK
mutually agree that the Bidder provides to BANK any
proprietary software or tools of Bidder or of a third
party, the parties shall negotiate and set forth the
applicable terms and conditions in a separate license
agreement and the provisions of this section shall not
apply to any deliverables related to customization or
implementation of any such proprietary software or
products of Bidder or of a third party. Further, BANK
acknowledges that in performing services under this
Agreement Bidder may use Bidder’s proprietary
materials including without limitation any software (or
any part or component thereof), tools, methodology,
processes, ideas, know-how and technology that are or
were developed or owned by Bidder prior to or
independent of the services performed hereunder or any
improvements, enhancements, modifications or
customization made thereto as part of or in the course
of performing the services hereunder, (“Bidder Pre-
Existing IP”). Bidder agrees that except with prior
consent of BANK, Bidder shall not embed or incorporate
any Bidder Pre-Existing IP. Notwithstanding anything to
the contrary contained in this Agreement, Bidder shall
continue to retain all the ownership, the rights title and
No change in the RFP.
Force Majeure We request the Bank to insert a provision on Force
Majeure.
No change in the RFP.
However, a legal opinion on
the same can be obtained
after the process of selection
of successful bidder is
completed and the decision of
the Bank will be final in that
regard.
Additional
Clauses
-121
Page 48 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
General Indemnity We request to add the following clause on general
indemnity-
Each party (in the capacity as indemnifying party) will
defend, indemnify and hold the other party, its affiliates,
directors, officers and employees (in the capacity of
indemnified party) from and against any third-party
claim, demand, suit, proceeding, cost and expenses
therewith to the extent such demand, claim or action
relates to or is based on any personal injury, death or
damage to property caused by the negligence or willful
misconduct of the indemnifying party or its agents and
representatives, in the performance of this Contract,
unless caused by the negligence or misconduct of the
other party/it’s personnel.
No change in the RFP.
Severability Request Bank to include clause on severability. No change in the RFP.
Non- exclusivity We request to include non-exclusivity of the services
provided by the Bidder to any third party-
Bidder shall be free to do similar business either for itself
or for any other party or offer similar services to any
third parties but without in any way affecting the
services agreed to be offered by Bidder under this
Proposal.
No change in the RFP.
Non-solicitation We request BANK to insert provisions for non-
solicitation of employees of the Bidder by BANK for a
period of two years.
No change in the RFP.
Additional
Clauses
-121
Page 49 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Tata Code of Conduct We request to add the following–
The business activities of the Bidder are self-regulated by
the “Tata Code of Conduct”. The BANK undertakes that it
will endeavor to promptly report any violation or
potential violation of the Code by any person to the
Local Ethics Counselor or the Principal Ethics Counsellor
or the CEO of Bidder. Bidder, in turn, undertakes that it
will maintain confidentiality of all communications
received.
No change in the RFP.
Defination for OEM Request that the Bank treats OEM as Oracle India Private
Limited as well Oracle Financial Services Software
Limited so that internally all Best Resources and
References can be leveraged in favor of IDBI Bank
Please be guided by the RFP
Are there any challenges in existing OFSA
implementation ?
In how much time ETL process is completed ?
Frequency of ALM process and reports?
In what time period OFSA Processes are executed ?
Can you please elaborate on performance requirements
as part of the project
Will be shared with the
successful bidder
Is the vendor expected to procure and/or install
hardware & software for the project?
The scope is for providing the
services as per the RFP
Please enlist the cost allocation methods which will be
used by the bank
Will be shared with the
Successful Bidder
Please share the DC & DR locations The project will be in Belapur,
Navi Mumbai
We assume that support is to be provided during the
regular business hours on regular business days only.
Please confirm.
Yes..during regular Business
hours and business days of the
Bank
Please share the total number of accounts; the type of
account and number of records per account.
Will be shared with the
Successful Bidder
Generic queries
General122
Additional
Clauses
-121
Page 50 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Please share the expected Year-on-year growth in the
number of records for each type of account.
Will be shared with the
Successful Bidder
Please share Frequency of running:
a. ALM reports(Daily)
b. FTP
c. Profitability
d. Basel III reports
a. Daily
b. Monthly
c. Monthly
d. Yet to be implemented
Limitation of Liability To the extent allowed under Indian laws, the Aggregate
Liability of either party under the contract, torts or any
other legal theory for all claims, loss, damages, breach,
etc shall in no event exceed the total value of the
contract.
Neither party shall be liable for any indirect, remote,
consequential loss or damages including but not limited
to loss of profit, loss of anticipated earning, loss of data,
revenues, goodwill, or business value whether or not
that party was aware or should have been aware of the
possibility of such costs, expenses or damages.
No change in the RFP.
Generic queries
General122
NEW123
Page 51 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
Product Acceptance All products (hardware and software) will be accepted
on delivery. Bidder will provide notice to Customer when
the Deliverables are ready for acceptance. Acceptance of
Deliverables will occur upon the date Bidder
demonstrates to Customer, by the successful completion
of acceptance tests that the Deliverables substantially
conform to the acceptance criteria as agreed between
Customer and Bidder and mentioned in the SOWs
attached. Acceptance will not be delayed for any reason
(s) other than non-conformance with the requirements
specified in the terms of Contract and SOW. The
acceptance test results will be declared by Bank within a
maximum of 7 (seven) days from the completion of
acceptance tests. In case the 7 (seven) days period after
completion of acceptance tests has elapsed without the
acceptance test results being declared, then the system
or the portion thereof, subject to acceptance testing
would be deemed accepted. If Bank fails to give Bidder
written notice of non-conformance within the 7 (seven)
day period or, prior to expiry of the 7 (seven) day period,
uses the system or any part thereof supplied by Bidder
for productive use (other than testing purposes), it will
be deemed accepted. In the event that any Deliverable
fails to confirm to the agreed acceptance criteria, Bidder
will have a reasonable time to remedy such non-
conformance by either repair or replacement of the
Deliverable, following Bidder's receipt of written notice
from Customer specifying in reasonable detail the nature
Please be guided by the RFP
NEW123
Page 52 of 53
SNO RFP Ref RFP Clause
No.Existing Clause Details Clarification Sought Bank's Response
IP Ownership Bidder shall retain ownership of:
a. all pre-existing Bidder Intellectual Property Rights
(“IPR”) and;
b. all IPR in Materials and Reports etc. developed during
the course of the agreement and remain therefore able
to re-use any copyrightable or patentable elements of
the Materials and Report in future engagements.
No change in the RFP.
a) legal opinion on the same
can be obtained after the
process of selection of
successful bidder is completed
and the decision of the Bank
will be final in that regard.
b) Cannot be considered.
Product Separation The acceptance criteria or procedures for Deliverables
set forth in this Agreement and as particularly described
in any SOW will only apply to the services provided
herein. It will not apply to any product the Bidder may
supply or has supplied to customer, regardless of
whether such products can be used in connection with
the services or Deliverables. Any refund/return or
penalty rights as set forth hereon apply only to the
services provided.
No change in the RFP.
Place : Mumbai
Date : 6th February 2015
NEW123
Page 53 of 53