48
Miniature faking http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limite

Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Miniature faking

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg

In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited.

Page 2: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Miniature faking

Page 3: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Miniature faking

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Oregon_State_Beavers_Tilt-Shift_Miniature_Greg_Keene.jpg

Page 4: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Review

• Previous section:– Feature detection and matching– Model fitting and outlier rejection

Page 5: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Project 2 discussion after break

Page 6: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Review: Interest points

• Keypoint detection: repeatable and distinctive– Corners, blobs, stable regions– Harris, DoG, MSER

Page 7: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Harris Detector [Harris88]

• Second moment matrix

)()(

)()()(),( 2

2

DyDyx

DyxDxIDI III

IIIg

7

1. Image derivatives

2. Square of derivatives

3. Gaussian filter g(sI)

Ix Iy

Ix2 Iy

2 IxIy

g(Ix2) g(Iy

2) g(IxIy)

222222 )]()([)]([)()( yxyxyx IgIgIIgIgIg

])),([trace()],(det[ 2DIDIhar

4. Cornerness function – both eigenvalues are strong

har5. Non-maxima suppression

1 2

1 2

det

trace

M

M

(optionally, blur first)

Page 8: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Review: Local Descriptors

• Most features can be thought of as templates, histograms (counts), or combinations

• Most available descriptors focus on edge/gradient information– Capture texture information– Color rarely used

K. Grauman, B. Leibe

Page 9: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

x

y

b

m

x

y m3 5 3 3 2 2

3 7 11 10 4 3

2 3 1 4 5 2

2 1 0 1 3 3

bSlide from S. Savarese

Review: Hough transform

Page 10: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Review: RANSAC

14INAlgorithm:

1. Sample (randomly) the number of points required to fit the model (#=2)2. Solve for model parameters using samples 3. Score by the fraction of inliers within a preset threshold of the model

Repeat 1-3 until the best model is found with high confidence

Page 11: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Review: 2D image transformations

Szeliski 2.1

Page 12: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

This section – multiple views

• Today – Intro and stereo

• Wednesday – Camera calibration

• Monday – Fundamental Matrix

Page 13: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Computer Vision

James Hays

Stereo:Intro

Slides by Kristen Grauman

Page 14: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Multiple views

Hartley and Zisserman

Lowestereo visionstructure from motionoptical flow

Page 15: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Why multiple views?• Structure and depth are inherently ambiguous from

single views.

Images from Lana Lazebnik

Page 16: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Why multiple views?• Structure and depth are inherently ambiguous from

single views.

Optical center

P1P2

P1’=P2’

Page 17: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

• What cues help us to perceive 3d shape and depth?

Page 18: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Shading

[Figure from Prados & Faugeras 2006]

Page 19: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Focus/defocus

[figs from H. Jin and P. Favaro, 2002]

Images from same point of view, different camera parameters

3d shape / depth estimates

Page 20: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Texture

[From A.M. Loh. The recovery of 3-D structure using visual texture patterns. PhD thesis]

Page 21: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Perspective effects

Image credit: S. Seitz

Page 22: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Motion

Figures from L. Zhang http://www.brainconnection.com/teasers/?main=illusion/motion-shape

Page 23: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Occlusion

Rene Magritt'e famous painting Le Blanc-Seing (literal translation: "The Blank Signature") roughly translates as "free hand" or "free rein".

Page 24: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

If stereo were critical for depth perception, navigation, recognition, etc., then this would be a problem

Page 25: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Multi-view geometry problems• Structure: Given projections of the same 3D point in two

or more images, compute the 3D coordinates of that point

Camera 3

R3,t3 Slide credit: Noah Snavely

?

Camera 1Camera 2R1,t1 R2,t2

Page 26: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Multi-view geometry problems• Stereo correspondence: Given a point in one of the

images, where could its corresponding points be in the other images?

Camera 3

R3,t3

Camera 1Camera 2R1,t1 R2,t2

Slide credit: Noah Snavely

Page 27: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Multi-view geometry problems• Motion: Given a set of corresponding points in two or

more images, compute the camera parameters

Camera 1Camera 2 Camera 3

R1,t1 R2,t2 R3,t3? ? ? Slide credit:

Noah Snavely

Page 28: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Human eye

Fig from Shapiro and Stockman

Pupil/Iris – control amount of light passing through lens

Retina - contains sensor cells, where image is formed

Fovea – highest concentration of cones

Rough analogy with human visual system:

Page 29: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Human stereopsis: disparity

Human eyes fixate on point in space – rotate so that corresponding images form in centers of fovea.

Page 30: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Disparity occurs when eyes fixate on one object; others appear at different visual angles

Human stereopsis: disparity

Page 31: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Random dot stereograms

• Julesz 1960: Do we identify local brightness patterns before fusion (monocular process) or after (binocular)?

• To test: pair of synthetic images obtained by randomly spraying black dots on white objects

Page 32: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Random dot stereograms

Forsyth & Ponce

Page 33: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Random dot stereograms

Page 34: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Random dot stereograms

• When viewed monocularly, they appear random; when viewed stereoscopically, see 3d structure.

• Human binocular fusion not directly associated with the physical retinas; must involve the central nervous system (V2, for instance).

• Imaginary “cyclopean retina” that combines the left and right image stimuli as a single unit

• High level scene understanding not required for Stereo

• But, high level scene understanding is arguably better than stereo

Page 35: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Stereo photography and stereo viewers

Invented by Sir Charles Wheatstone, 1838 Image from fisher-price.com

Take two pictures of the same subject from two slightly different viewpoints and display so that each eye sees only one of the images.

Page 36: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

http://www.johnsonshawmuseum.org

Page 37: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

http://www.johnsonshawmuseum.org

Page 38: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Public Library, Stereoscopic Looking Room, Chicago, by Phillips, 1923

Page 39: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

http://www.well.com/~jimg/stereo/stereo_list.html

Page 40: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Autostereograms

Images from magiceye.com

Exploit disparity as depth cue using single image.

(Single image random dot stereogram, Single image stereogram)

Page 41: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Images from magiceye.com

Autostereograms

Page 42: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Estimating depth with stereo

• Stereo: shape from “motion” between two views• We’ll need to consider:

•Info on camera pose (“calibration”)•Image point correspondences

scene point

optical center

image plane

Page 43: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Two cameras, simultaneous views

Single moving camera and static scene

Stereo vision

Page 44: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Camera parameters

Camera frame 1

Intrinsic parameters:Image coordinates relative to camera Pixel coordinates

Extrinsic parameters:Camera frame 1 Camera frame 2

Camera frame 2

• Extrinsic params: rotation matrix and translation vector• Intrinsic params: focal length, pixel sizes (mm), image center

point, radial distortion parameters

We’ll assume for now that these parameters are given and fixed.

Page 45: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Geometry for a simple stereo system

• First, assuming parallel optical axes, known camera parameters (i.e., calibrated cameras):

Page 46: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

baseline

optical center (left)

optical center (right)

Focal length

World point

image point (left)

image point (right)

Depth of p

Page 47: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

• Assume parallel optical axes, known camera parameters (i.e., calibrated cameras). What is expression for Z?

Similar triangles (pl, P, pr) and (Ol, P, Or):

Geometry for a simple stereo system

Z

T

fZ

xxT rl

lr xx

TfZ

disparity

Page 48: Miniature faking Jodhpur_tilt_shift.jpg In close-up photo, the depth of field is limited

Depth from disparity

image I(x,y) image I´(x´,y´)Disparity map D(x,y)

(x´,y´)=(x+D(x,y), y)

So if we could find the corresponding points in two images, we could estimate relative depth…