Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry - Results and Future … · 2019-02-01 · Resources and Energy WG 2. Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG 3. Iron and Steel WG 4. ... including

Results and Future Issues Pertaining to the Fiscal

2007 Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on

the Environment

December 14, 2007

Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee

for Natural Resources and Energy

Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council

[Table of Contents]

I. System and Viewpoint of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Up to the Voluntary Action Plan ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・1

1. Follow-Up to the Voluntary Action Plan 2. Types of “Voluntary Action Plans” 3. CO2 Emissions by Industries in Fiscal 2006 4. Organization of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Up 5. Points made in regards to voluntary action plans in the “interim report” (issued on September

26, 2007) by the Industrial Structure Council and the Central Environment Council. 6. Scope of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Up

II. Summaries of WG Chairs’ Reports ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・7

1. Resources and Energy WG 2. Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG 3. Iron and Steel WG 4. Chemicals and Nonferrous Metal WG 5. Electronics, Electrical Equipment, and Industrial Machinery WG 6. Automobiles, Auto Parts and Auto Body WG 7. Distribution and Service WG

III. Results of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Ups ・・・・・・・・・・・・・26

1. Outline of evaluation results 2. Evaluation of Follow-Up by scopes 3. The status of progress of each industry

IV. Strengthening Voluntary Action Plan and Expansion of Target Areas: Progress in Industries under the Jurisdiction of Ministries and Agencies ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・42

V. Issues Identified for the Future ・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・・46

1. Strengthening voluntary action plans and expansion of target areas 2. Enhancement of Target-Missing Industries’ Likelihood of Achieving Targets 3. Target-setting with the inclusion of CO2 emissions 4. Active disclosure of information 5. Transmission of information at home and abroad 6. Strengthening efforts in the business/commercial, household and transport sectors

(Reference) Industries’ Performance Indicators and Factor Analyses・・50

1. Changes in industries’ performance indicators (graph) 2. CO2 emissions by industry (performance in FY2006) 3. Factor analysis of CO2 emissions 4. Factor analysis of CO2 emission intensity 5. Changes in industries’ CO2 emissions and energy intensity (from base year) 6. Utilization of the Kyoto Mechanisms 7. Strengthening efforts in the commercial and transport sectors

WG Membership roster of the Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy and the Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council・・・・・・・・・86

1

I. System and Viewpoint of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Up to the Voluntary Action Plan 1. Follow-Up to the Voluntary Action Plan (1) Status of “Voluntary Action Plans” in the Target Achievement Plan

GovernmentGovernment--led measures clearly identified in the led measures clearly identified in the ““Target Achievement PlanTarget Achievement Plan”” (adopted by the Cabinet in April 2005) (adopted by the Cabinet in April 2005)

(1) ““Voluntary action plansVoluntary action plans”” of manufacturing industriesof manufacturing industries・““Playing a central rolePlaying a central role”” in countermeasures in the industrial sectorin countermeasures in the industrial sector→ Covering 28 manufacturing industries28 manufacturing industries (emitting 360 million t-CO2 , approx. 79% of approx. 79% of emissions from the industrialemissions from the industrialsector, and approx. 26% of the total emissions in Japan sector, and approx. 26% of the total emissions in Japan (FY 2005))・The government is to “regularly conduct follow-ups in related councils, etc.”・Estimated rEstimated reduceduction effect: 42.4 million ttion effect: 42.4 million t--CO2CO2 (3.3% of the national total emissions)

* Difference in FY 2010 depending on whether or not the countermeasures are implemented

(2) Efforts by electricity utilities to achieve voluntary targets (bEfforts by electricity utilities to achieve voluntary targets (based on their voluntary action plans)ased on their voluntary action plans)・ Target: 20% reduction of CO2 emission intensity over the FY 1990 level 20% reduction of CO2 emission intensity over the FY 1990 level through: (1) improvement of the nuclear power facilities usage rate, (2) improvement of the heat efficiency of thermal power generation, and (3) utilization of the Kyoto Mechanisms・The government is to “regularly conduct follow-ups in related councils, etc.”・Estimated reduction effect: Approx. 66Estimated reduction effect: Approx. 66--68 million t68 million t--CO2CO2 (approx. 5.2-5.4% of the national total emissions in the base year)

※The reduction effects indicated above are those expected in FY2010 over the FY2005 level, including the effects achieved through energy-conservation measures taken in the industrial, household/commercial, and transportation sectors. An additional reduction effect expected to be realized at the time of formulation of the achievement plan is 17 million t-CO2 (5% reduction over the FY1990 level).

(Reference) Keidanren Keidanren ““Voluntary Action PlanVoluntary Action Plan””・Formulated in June, 1997

Target: ““Reducing CO2 emissions in the industrial and energyReducing CO2 emissions in the industrial and energy--conversion sectors in FY2010 below the FY1990 level.conversion sectors in FY2010 below the FY1990 level.””Covering 35 industries35 industries (emitting 510 million t-CO2, 83% of emissions from the industrial and energy-conversion sectors and 40% of the total emissions in Japan (FY1990))・Recent performance: 0.6% reduction over the base year (FY2005)

(2) Voluntary Action Plan / METI Follow-Ups

[Follow[Follow--up subjects and affiliated working groups]up subjects and affiliated working groups]

<METI implements follow<METI implements follow--ups to the Voluntary Action Plan every year from FY 1998 (MOE hups to the Voluntary Action Plan every year from FY 1998 (MOE has joined the FY2006 Followas joined the FY2006 Follow--Ups)> Ups)> ◆ In order to ensure that the participating industries will achieve their targets, the government is conducting follow-ups in

order to review the progress in each industry every fiscal year.◆ FY2007 Follow-ups cover 39 industries under the jurisdiction of METI, namely the 29 industries in the industrial and energy-

conversion sectors and the ten industries in the business/commercial sector (six industries newly covered this fiscal year).※ Participating in the follow-up for the first time (two industries): Japan LP Gas Association, Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc.

Formulated voluntary action plans for the first time (four industries): Japan Leasing Association, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, mass retailers of household appliances, Power Producers and Suppliers

Resources and Energy WG

1. Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan2. Petroleum Association of Japan3. Japan Gas Association4. Japan Mining Industry Association5. Limestone Association of Japan6. Japan Petroleum Development Association7. Japan LP Gas Association8. Power Producers and Suppliers

Electronics, Electrical Equipment, and Industrial

Machinery WG26. 4 electrical/electronics-related groups(Japan Electronics and Information Technology Industries Association (JEITA), Communications and Information network Association of Japan (CIAJ), Japan Business Machine and Information System Industries Association (JBMIA), Japan Electrical Manufacturers’ Association (JEMA))27. Japan Machine Tool Builders' Association28. Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association29. Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers30. Japan Bearing Industrial Association

Iron and Steel WG

9. Japan Iron and Steel Federation

Chemicals and Nonferrous Metal WG

10. Japan Chemical Industry Association11. Lime Manufacture Association12. Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association13. Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’Association14. Japan Aluminum Association 15. Japan Copper and Brass Association

Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG

16. Japan Paper Association17. Japan Cement Association18. Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan19. Japan Textile Finishers' Association20. Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association21. Japan Glass Bottle Association

Automobile, Auto Parts and Auto Body WG

22. Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association23. Japan Auto Parts Industries Association24. Japan Auto-Body Industries Association25. Japan Industrial Vehicles Association

Distribution and Service WG

31. Japan Chain Stores Association32. Japan Franchise Association33. Japan Department Stores Association34. Japan DIY Industry Association35. Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores36. Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc.37. Japan Leasing Association 38. Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association 39. Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers

※ Blue： Participating in the follow- year up for the first time Red： Formulated voluntary action plans for the first time

※Blue: Participating in the follow-up for the first time

Red: Formulated voluntary action plans for

the first time

2

2. Types of “Voluntary Action Plans”

Classification Industrial and energy-conversion sector Business/commercial sector Transport sector1 R: Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan D: Japan Department Stores Associati All Japan Freight Forwarders Association

2 R: Petroleum Association of Japan D: Japan Chain Stores Association Japan Trucking Association3 R: Japan Gas Association D: Japan Franchise Association The Association of Japanese Private Railways

4 R: Japan Mining Industry Association Japan LP Gas Association The Scheduled Airlines Association of Japan

5 R: Limestone Association of Japan Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc. The Japanese Shipowners' Association

6 I: Japan Iron and Steel Federation Japan Association of Refrigerated Warehouse Seven JR companies7 C: Japan Chemical Industry Association Japan Hotel Association Japan Federation of Coastal Shipping Associations

8 C: Lime Manufacture Association The Real Estate Companies Association of Japan

9 C: Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association NTT Group10 C: Japan Aluminium Association Japanese Bankers Association11 C: Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers' Association The General Insurance Association of Japan

12 C: Japan Copper and Brass Association Life Insurance Association of Japan13 P: Japan Paper Association14 P: Japan Cement Association15 P: Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan16 P: Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association17 E: 4 electrical/electronics-related groups18 E: Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers19 E: Japan Bearing Industrial Association20 E: Japan Machine Tool Builders' Association21 A: Japan Auto Parts Industries Association22 A: Japan Auto-Body Industries Association23 A: Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association24 A: Japan Industrial Vehicles Association25 D: Japan Petroleum Development Association26 The Shipbuilders’ Association of Japan and the Cooperative Association of Japan

Shipbuilders

27 Japan Association of Rolling Stock Industries28 Japan Federation of Construction Contractors, Japan Civil Engineering

Contractors’ Association and Building Contractors Society

29 Japan Federation of Housing Organizations30 The Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers' Associations of Japan and

Japan Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association

31 Brewers Association of Japan32 Japan Dairy Industry Association33 Japan Sugar Refiners’ Association34 The Japan Soft Drinks Association35 Flour Millers Association1 P: Japan Textile Finishers' Association D: Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores Nihon Bus Association2 P: Japan Glass Bottle Association D: Japan DIY Industry Association Japan Federation of Taxicab Associations

3 E: Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association D: Japan Leasing Association The Japan Harbor Transportation Association

4 R: Power Producer and Supplier D: Japan Information Technology Services IndustryAssociation Japan Passenger Boats Association

5 Japan Frozen Food Association D: Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers

6 Japan Mayonnaise and Dressing Association Japan Foodservice Association7 Japan Convenience Foods Industry Association Japan Processed Foods Wholesalers Association

8 Japan Canners Association NHK (Japan Broadcasting Corporation)

9 All Nippon Kashi Association Telecom Services Association10 The Japan Soy Sauce Brewers Association Telecommunications Carriers Association

11 Japan Oilseeds Processors Association The National Association of Commercial Broadcastersin Japan

12 Japan Ham and Sausage Processors Cooperative Association Japan Cable and Telecommunications Association

13 Japan Baking Industry Association Japan Satellite Broadcasting Association

14 Japan Boating Industry Association Japan Ryokan Association15 Japan Ryokan & Hotel Association16 Japan Automobile Service Promotion

Association17 The Japan Warehousing Association Inc

Small-and-medium-sized manufacturers Small-and-medium-sized retailing Small-and-medium-sized transportation

Agriculture Securities/investment trust Transport sector in manufacturersPrinting HospitalPhotographic equipment SchoolTextiles

Of them, 35 industries inindustrial and energy-

conversion sector(±0 percent of industries

targeted by NipponKeidanren)

* The reduction effect targetthereof (42.4 million t-CO2) isintended for the 28 manufacturingindustries marked with ○ in thetable (those in the energy-conversion sector and theconstruction sector are excluded).

All 60 bodies and corporationsparticipating in Nippon Keidanren

have prepared voluntary actionplans (including

business/commercial and transport)

Non-Nippon Keidanren memberindustries that have prepared

voluntary action plans

Industries that have yet to preparevoluntary action plans

[Legend] Working group (WG) R: Resources and Energy WG C: Chemicals and Nonferrous Metal WG E: Electronics, Electrical Equipment, and

Industrial Machinery WG I: Iron and Steel WG P: Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG A: Automobile, Auto Parts and Auto Body WG D: Distribution WG

METI 39 industries

MLIT 24 industries

MAFF 15 industries

MIC 6 industries (NTT group is included in the Telecommunications Carriers Association.)

[Follow-ups by ministries]

3

3. CO2 Emissions by Industries in Fiscal 2006

(Emission unit: 10,000t-CO2)

Industry (Industrial sector) CO2emissions Ratio

1 Japan Iron and Steel Federation 19,326.0 53.2%2 Japan Chemical Industry Association 7,288.0 20.0%3 Japan Paper Association 2,330.1 6.4%4 Japan Cement Association 2,184.3 6.0%5 4 electrical/electronics-related groups 1,846.0 5.1%6 Japan Auto Parts Industries Association 697.8 1.9%7 Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association 559.0 1.5%8 Japan Mining Industry Association 482.5 1.3%9 Lime Manufacture Association 311.6 0.9%10 Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association 212.2 0.6%11 Japan Textile Finishers' Association 175.5 0.5%12 Japan Aluminum Association 154.1 0.4%13 Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan 135.8 0.4%14 Japan Glass Bottle Association 103.6 0.3%15 Japan Auto-Body Industries Association 100.8 0.3%16 Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association 81.8 0.2%17 Japan Bearing Industrial Association 68.6 0.2%18 Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers 59.5 0.2%19 Japan Copper and Brass Association 58.6 0.2%20 Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association 49.2 0.1%21 Limestone Association of Japan 35.6 0.1%22 Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association 33.4 0.1%23 Japan Machine Tool Builders' Association 26.2 0.1%24 Japan Petroleum Development Association 24.8 0.1%25 Japan Industrial Vehicles Association 6.6 0.0%

Total 36,351.6 100.0%


Industry (Energy-conversion sector) CO2emissions Ratio

26 Petroleum Association of Japan 4,062.0 52.0%27 Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan (own use) 3,700.0 47.3%28 Japan Gas Association 38.0 0.5%29 Power Producer and Supplier 18.6 0.2%

Total 7,818.6 100.0%


Industry (Business/commercial sector) CO2emissions Ratio

30 Japan Chain Stores Association 658.3 51.5%31 Japan Franchise Association 267.0 20.9%32 Japan Department Stores Association 171.6 13.4%33 Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers 56.0 4.4%34 Japan DIY Industry Association 46.2 3.6%35 Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association 44.9 3.5%36 Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores 25.9 2.0%37 Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc. 4.3 0.3%38 Japan LP Gas Association 3.3 0.3%39 Japan Leasing Association 0.3 0.0%

Total 1,277.757 100.0%

(2) Energy-conversion sector (Four industries)

(1) Industrial sector (25 industries) Approx. 80% of the total emissions in the industrial sector as estimated in the target achievement plan (456 million t-CO2, FY 2005）

Approx. 100% of the total emissions in the energy-conversion sector as estimated in the target achievement plan (78.5 million t-CO2, FY 2005)

(3) Business/commercial sector (Ten industries) Approx. 6% of the total emissions in the business/commercial sector as estimated in the target achievement plan (238 million t-CO2, FY 2005）

日本製紙連合会6.4%

セメント協会6.0%

電機・電子４団体5.1%

日本化学工業協会20.0%

日本鉄鋼連盟53.2%

Japan Iron and Steel Federation

53.2% Japan Chemical Industry

Association 20.0%

Japan Paper Association

6.4%

Japan Cement Association

6.0%

4 electrical/electronics-related groups 5.1%

日本ガス協会0.5%

電気事業連合会（固有分）47.3%

石油連盟52.0%

特定規模電気事業0.2%

Petroleum Association

of Japan 52.0%

Federation of Electric Power Companies of

Japan (own use)47.3%

Japan Gas Association

0.5%

Power Producer and Supplier

0.2%

情報サービス産業協会3.5%

大手家電流通懇談会4.4%

日本DIY協会3.6%

日本フランチャイズチェーン協会

20.9%

日本百貨店協会13.4%

日本チェーンストア協会51.5%

Japan Chain Stores

Association 51.5%

Japan Franchise Association

20.9%

Japan Department Stores Association

13.4%

Japan DIY Industry Association

3.6%

Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association

3.5%

Meeting of Large Household Appliance

Retailers 4.4%

4

4. Organization of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Up

Global Environment Subcommittee, Environment Committee,

Industrial Structure Council

[Follow[Follow--Up WG]Up WG]

Held on Oct. 11 and 17, 2007



Iron and Steel WGIron and Steel WG






Machinery WG


Machinery WG



Joint Joint meetingmeeting


Expert Committee for FollowExpert Committee for Follow--up to up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the the Voluntary Action Plan on the

EnvironmentEnvironment

Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural

Resources and Energy

Joint Subcommittee for FollowJoint Subcommittee for Follow--up up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the to the Voluntary Action Plan on the


Held on Nov. 5, 2007

Global Environment Committee,

Central Environment Council

Two members of the Expert Two members of the Expert Committee on the FollowCommittee on the Follow--up up to the Voluntary Action Plan to the Voluntary Action Plan participate in each WGparticipate in each WG

Distribution and Service

WG


WG


Global Environment Subcommittee, Environment Committee,

Industrial Structure Council

[Follow[Follow--Up WG]Up WG]

Held on Oct. 11 and 17, 2007



Iron and Steel WGIron and Steel WG






Machinery WG


Machinery WG





Expert Committee for FollowExpert Committee for Follow--up to up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the the Voluntary Action Plan on the


Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural

Resources and Energy

Joint Subcommittee for FollowJoint Subcommittee for Follow--up up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the to the Voluntary Action Plan on the


Held on Nov. 5, 2007

Global Environment Committee,

Central Environment Council

Two members of the Expert Two members of the Expert Committee on the FollowCommittee on the Follow--up up to the Voluntary Action Plan to the Voluntary Action Plan participate in each WGparticipate in each WG


WG


WG


◆Following the last fiscal year, follow-ups were implemented jointly with the Central Environment Council of the Ministry of the Environment. ◆Follow-ups were conducted at the joint meetings of the related working groups set up in the Joint

Subcommittee of the Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy and the Central Environment Council and Industrial Structure Council.

5

5. Points made in regards to voluntary action plans in the “interim report” (issued on September 26, 2007) by the Industrial Structure Council and the Central Environment Council. III Reviewing Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement Plan (1) Measures whose substance should be specifically considered as soon as possible and whose effects should be estimated to a maximum extent. (i) Measures against CO2 from energy sources <Sectors related to industry and energy conversion> <Cross-sector matters> (Promotion of voluntary action plans) Progress made by industries under the jurisdiction of each ministry and agency in regards to the voluntary action plans was presented during the 18th joint meeting held on June 27 of this year. Henceforth, it is necessary for all ministries and agencies to provide further encouragement to the industries concerned and in particular encourage the industries that have not made sufficient efforts at present to enhance and expand their plans. This policy direction was also confirmed at the meeting of senior officials of the Global Warming Prevention Headquarters held on July 17 of this year, and the following specific measures are to be implemented by the end of October this year at the latest. This means that, while it is necessary to further encourage industries that have yet to prepare voluntary action plans to formulate such plans, industries that have formulated voluntary action plans but have yet to set numerical targets should be encouraged to establish quantitative numerical targets in terms of CO2 emissions, etc. At the same time, as for the industries whose voluntary action plans have yet to undergo follow-up surveys by the competent ministries or agencies, strict follow-up surveys by way of transparent procedures such as open deliberative councils should be conducted by the supervisory ministries or agencies. Furthermore, as for the industries whose current performance exceeds the level of the quantitative targets set, they should be encouraged to set targets higher than their current achievements. Based on this, given that the initial commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol covers the five-year period from 2008 to 2012, it is necessary to insist that targets of the plans be achieved in terms of a five-year average. As for industries that have yet to achieve their target levels (pertaining to the most recent fiscal year), they are called upon to make efforts to ensure target achievement by way of indicating the contents and effects of their future measures (including the utilization of the Kyoto Mechanisms) as quantitatively and specifically as possible. In the meantime, when Kyoto Mechanism Credits are acquired by each industry for the purpose of achieving the voluntary action plan targets, it should be confirmed that said credits will be transferred to the government’s accounts without charge. Taking into account the fact that the Kyoto Protocol targets the total amount reduction of greenhouse gas emissions, industries that only set CO2 emission intensity as a performance indicator should actively consider also setting CO2 emissions as a performance indicator. It is necessary to facilitate cross-sector efforts by Keidanren, etc. aimed at contributing to the commercial and transport sectors. Such efforts include those by Keidanren member industries and companies, such as (i) reducing CO2 emissions in their office buildings and (ii) expanding the use of environmental household account books by employee households. Also, with regards to efforts based on voluntary action plans, the dissemination of information to other countries and consumers in Japan in an easy-to-understand way should be conducted. *Snip* Main industries for which enhanced and expanded voluntary action plans are particularly anticipated are indicated as follows: (Shown in parentheses are the supervising ministries, agencies, etc.) ●Further prompting of industries that have yet to prepare voluntary action plans to formulate such plans [Subject industries] Pachinko parlors, game arcades (National Police Agency), credit associations, credit unions, securities corporations (Financial Services Agency), schools (Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology), hospitals (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), information services, leasing services, power producers and suppliers, mass retailers of household appliances, large-scale exhibitions (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), industrial waste disposal, pet retailers, newspaper publishers (Ministry of the Environment) ●Promotion of the quantification of qualitative targets Industries that have formulated their voluntary action plans but have yet to set numerical targets (non-Keidanren member industries) should be urged to quantify their targets. [Subject industries] Life insurance services (Financial Services Agency), communication services, broadcasting services (Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications), restaurant industry (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries), warehouses, bus services, taxi services, harbor transportation, boating sector (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport) ●Strict implementation of government follow-up surveys Strict follow-up surveys by way of transparent procedures such as open deliberative councils should be conducted. A correct understanding of the most recent conditions should be maintained through the implementation of follow-up surveys every fiscal year. [Subject industries] Banks, life insurance services, non-life insurance services (Financial Services Agency), brewers, tobacco manufacturers (Ministry of Finance), pharmaceutical firms, cooperative societies (Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare), liquefied petroleum gas industry, trading firms (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry) ●Promoting target-raising efforts Through the implementation of strict follow-ups, efforts to raise targets by industries including the business/commercial and transport sectors should be promoted. In this regard, new target levels should be aggressively set higher than those achieved. [Subject industries] Food manufacturers (Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries), chemical industry, petroleum industry, cement industry (Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry), trucking, housing sector (Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport)

6

6. Scope of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Up In light of the points made in last year’s follow-up surveys, follow-ups will be made with thefollowing perspectives in mind. (1) Raising target levels of target-achieving industries As for industries whose current performance is exceeding the level of the quantitative targets set (25 industries), we encourage them to raise their targets and we will evaluate the range of target raising in a rigorous manner. In particular, industries that set targets in terms of energy consumption intensity are called upon to raise their targets above their current achievements while paying attention to the targets under the Act concerning the Rational Use of Energy (Energy Saving Act) regarding long- and medium-term improvement of energy consumption intensity at factories and business offices by over 1% on average on a yearly basis.

(2) Enhancement of target-missing industries’ likelihood of achieving targets As for industries that have yet to achieve their current target levels (the FY 2006 performance) (14 industries), including electric power, and iron and steel sectors, we will evaluate the range of their non-achievement of targets (basic units and amounts required for achievements) as well as identify contents and effects of future measures for compensating for their non-achievement in quantitative and specific terms. As for industries utilizing the Kyoto Mechanism Credits in cases wherein the achievement of targets is unlikely, we encourage them to present prospects of the amount of credits to be purchased and the timing of said purchases in specific terms to the greatest extent possible. (3) Setting targets combining CO2 emissions In light of the fact that the Kyoto Protocol’s target is CO2 emissions, industries that define their targets in terms of CO2 emission intensity should also study the use of CO2 emissions as a performance indicator. Industries that set new targets in terms of CO2 emissions will be proactively evaluated. (4) Relations with Global Warming Law As for CO2 emissions, etc. which are preconditions for evaluation of each industry’s voluntary action plans, industry-by-industry formulation and management is, in principle, being conducted. On the other hand, the mandatory greenhouse gas accounting and reporting system came into force in April of this year under the Law Concerning the Promotion of the Measures to Cope with Global Warming (Global Warming Law). In principle, all corporations (business operators) whose emissions are above a certain level are required to make their CO2 emissions public. Starting with this year’s voluntary action plans, under the Global Warming Law, industries are required to publicize their CO2 emissions for all business establishments on a list of corporations (all business establishments) participating in the voluntary actions plans. Industries that have actively disclosed information will be commended. Also, we will identify the proportion of business establishments covered by the Global Warming Law and the Energy Saving Act among those corporations participating in the voluntary actions plans for each industry.

7

II. Summaries of WG Chairs’ Reports Summaries of chairs’ reports based on deliberations in the current fiscal year are outlined in the following pages.

1. Resources and Energy WG 2. Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG 3. Iron and Steel WG 4. Chemicals and Nonferrous Metal WG 5. Electronics, Electrical Equipment, and Industrial Machinery WG 6. Automobiles, Auto Parts and Auto Body WG 7. Distribution and Service WG

8

Resources and Energy WG Summary of Chair’s Report

November 5, 2007

Resources and Energy WG Chair: Shigefumi Nishio

1. Time and Date of WG Meeting ・Time and date: October 11, 2007 (Thu.) 15:00~18:00 ・Venue: Conference room, Mita Auditorium

2. Members (Present)

[Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Nishio (Chair), Inaba, Kono, Sato, Sekiya, Yamaji [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Otsuka, Masui (Absent)

[Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Nagumo, Matsuda

3. Industries covered by deliberations (eight industries)

Federation of Electric Power Companies, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan LP Gas Association, Power Producer and Supplier, Japan Mining Industry Association, Limestone Association of Japan, Japan Petroleum Development Association

Starting from the current fiscal year, two industries participated for the first time.

Participating in the follow-ups for the first time: Japan LP Gas Association Formulated voluntary action plans for the first time: Power Producers and Supplier

4. Results of deliberations

At the beginning of the deliberations, the chairman made the following statements concerning voluntary action plans: ・ We regard efforts based on voluntary action plans as part of the promotion of industrial

competitiveness. CO2 will be reduced as a result of efforts based on energy cost reduction. ・ CO2 emissions from energy sources were reduced by about 50 million tons in the industrial

sector while those in the commercial and transport sectors increased. As a result, about 50 million tons were reduced. The industrial sector as a whole is doing well.

9

・ We should do more to actively promote energy saving measures that are conducive to consumers, business/commercial sector, etc.

(1) Progress of voluntary action plans

[Federation of Electric Power Companies ・ The FY 2006 performance is 0.410kg- CO2/kWh, a decrease of 0.013kg- CO2/kWh from

FY 2005. As the average estimate in FY 2008 through FY 2012 stands at about 0.37kg- CO2/kWh, targets are likely not to be achieved. (With regards to the impacts of the Chuetsu Earthquake, the federation is engaged in in-depth investigations of facilities and causes, and such impacts are unknown at present. As such, the follow-ups this time have not taken these impacts into account.)

[Petroleum Association of Japan] ・ Achieved its target (energy intensity) for the eighth consecutive year.

[Japan Gas Association] ・ Achieved its target (CO2 emissions and CO2 emission intensity) for the second

consecutive year. [Japan Mining Industry Association, Limestone Association of Japan] ・ Both industries achieved their targets (CO2 intensity)

[Japan Petroleum Development Association] ・ Achieved its target in FY 2006.

(2) Target-raising by target-achieving industries

Two industries, the Petroleum Association of Japan and the Japan Gas Association, raised their targets for the current fiscal year (below their achievement levels).

Regarding emission calculation methods, the Japan Gas Association changed its previous calculation method based on statistical data to one that incorporates energy consumption as measured by each business establishment.

Also, the Japan Mining Industry Association raised its targets (below its achievement levels). (3) Enhancement of target-missing industries’ likelihood of achieving targets

[Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan] ・ An average estimate of the CO2 emission intensity from FY 2008 to FY 2012 amounted

to about 0.37kg-CO2/k, leaving about 0.03kg-CO2/kWh unachieved. However, the federation says that it intends to achieve its target by promoting nuclear power generation, enhancing the thermal efficiency of thermal power plants and utilizing the Kyoto Mechanisms (acquiring a total of about 120 million t-CO2 emissions reduction credits by FY 2008 through FY 2012).

・ Promotion of nuclear power generation based on the premise of ensuring security and restoring trust: About 2~3% enhancement expected.

・ Promotion of the thermal efficiency of thermal power plants and the study of thermal power operation methods: Up to about 1% enhancement expected.

10

・ Utilization of the Kyoto Mechanisms, etc.: About 5~6% enhancement expected. [Japan LP Gas Association] ・ The Association says that it aims to achieve its targets through efforts to reduce electric power used

at each station and promotion of base intensification. [Japan Petroleum Development Association] ・ The Association says that it intends to achieve its targets through energy saving measures

such as (1) the installment of waste-heat boiler equipment (GHG reduction by 7,000 tons), (2) the streamlining of worn out facilities and (3) the introduction of energy saving equipment.

(4) Principal matters highlighted

[Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan] ・As CO2 intensity has barely decreased since the 1990s, permanent forward-looking

efforts are required. ・For the purpose of enhancing the facility utilization rate of nuclear power in a

stable manner, efforts by all personnel involved are required. ・Enhancement of the efficiency of distribution facilities should also be promoted. ・It is necessary to pay sufficient attention to the point that large-scale purchases of

Kyoto Mechanism Credits affects credit prices. ・The federation should transfer 120 million credits to the government without

charge, thus contributing to Japan’s 6% reduction target. [Petroleum Association of Japan] ・The fact that the industry raised its targets should be commended. However, as the

new target levels are lower than the most recent performance, the industry should consider whether its targets can be further enhanced.

[Power Producer and Supplier] ・The industry’s targets are lower than the FY 2006 performance, and if possible, it

should raise its targets.

11

Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG Summary of Chair’s Report

November 5, 2007

Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG Chair: Shigefumi Nishio

1. Time and Date of WG Meeting ・Time and date: October 11, 2007 (Thu.) 15:00~18:00 ・Venue: Conference room, Mita Auditorium

2. Members (Present) [Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Nishio (Chair), Aomi, Arai, Kono, Nakanishi [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Fujie (Absent) [Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Nakagami [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Hirai

3. Industries covered by deliberations (six industries)

Japan Paper Association, Japan Cement Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, Japan Glass Bottle Association, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association


At the beginning of the deliberations, the chairman made the following statements concerning voluntary action plans:

・ From the viewpoint of energy conservation and reduction of energy costs, it is desirable that CO2 emissions be reduced as a result thereof. ・ The fact that industries whose production quantity is increasing tend to choose CO2

intensity whereas those whose production quantity is decreasing tend to choose the total amount is making it difficult to reduce CO2 emissions.

12

(1) Progress of voluntary action plan

All industries have already achieved their targets with regard to almost all performance indicators. (2) Target raising by target achieving industry

The following five industries raised their targets this year. Among these, the Japan Paper Association raised its target to a level higher than its performance levels.

(1) Japan Paper Association, (2) Japan Cement Association, (3) Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, (4) Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, (5) Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association

（3）Target setting combined with CO2 emissions

The Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan defined its targets in terms of CO2 emissions for this fiscal year.


[Japan Cement Association,] ・ The association should aggressively disseminate information on the contents of its energy

saving efforts to foreign countries. ・ Its targets should be further enhanced as it has already achieved (4) or 4% reductions from

2003 to 2005. [Japan Glass Bottle Association] ・ As making bottles from cullet is thought to consume the most energy, the utilization of

returnable containers should be considered.

13

Iron and Steel WG

Summary of Chair’s Report

November 5, 2007 Iron and Steel WG

Chair: Taketo Sakuma 1. Time and Date of WG Meeting ・Time and date: October 11, 2007 (Thu.) 15:00~18:00 ・Venue: Conference room, Mita Auditorium


Sakuma (Chair), Kudo, Matsubashi, Yoshioka [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Kobayashi, Moriguchi (Absent) [Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Yonemoto 3. Industries covered by deliberations (One industry)

Japan Iron and Steel Federation 4. Results of deliberations (1) Progress of voluntary action plans

The target of the Japan Iron and Steel Federation’s voluntary action plan is to cut energy consumption in the steel production process by 10% by fiscal 2010 from the level in the base year of fiscal 1990, on the assumption that crude steel output will be at a level of around 100 million tons. While this fiscal year’s crude steel output increased by 5.4% from the fiscal 1990 level, energy consumption improved by 5.2% and CO2 emissions by 5.1% thanks to improvements in energy intensity.

(2) Enhancement of target-missing industries’ likelihood of achieving targets

14

The Federation has stated that it intends to promote target achievement through energy saving measures such as (1) waste heat recovery and (2) the promotion of high-efficiency facilities, as well as through utilization of Kyoto Mechanism Credits (44 million tons in fiscal 2008 to fiscal 2012) as a supplemental method to compensate for the shortfall.


[Iron and steel industry] ・ Environmental measures taken by the Japanese iron and steel industry are leading

the world, and this fact can be positively commended. ・ The industry has yet to achieve its targets due to an increase in production output. It

is hoped that the industry will finally achieve its target, as it is implementing efforts such as utilization of the Kyoto mechanism. ・ Since the industry emits CO2 in large amounts, it is essential that it achieves its

targets. ・ The fact that the industry is aggressively engaged in international collaborative

activities such as the Asia-Pacific Partnership and the IISI can be positively commended.

15

Chemicals and Nonferrous Metal WG Summary of Chair’s Report

November 5, 2007 Chemicals and Nonferrous Metal WG

Chair: Takeo Kikkawa 1. Time and Date of WG Meeting ・Time and date: October 11, 2007 (Thu.) 15:00~18:00 ・Venue: Conference room, Mita Auditorium


Kitano, Sato, Nakamura, Nishi [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council ]

Urano, Moriguchi (Absent) [Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Kikkawa (Chair), Kakuta, Tsutsumi 3. Industries covered by deliberations (six industries)

Japan Chemical Industry Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Japan Copper and Brass Association

4. Results of deliberations At the beginning of the deliberations, the chairman made the following statements concerning voluntary action plans: ・ The basic aim of the voluntary action plans is to reduce energy consumption intensity and CO2

emission intensity to the greatest extent possible. ・ Some industries have set their performance indicators in terms of CO2 emission intensity. We

should not forget that our final goal is reducing CO2 emissions. ・ International comparative data regarding efforts towards global warming countermeasures are

not sufficient. ・ It is preferable that Japanese technology be exported in order to facilitate global warming

countermeasures in China, India and elsewhere. (1) Progress of voluntary action plans

16

All industries have already achieved their targets with regard to almost all performance indicators. (2) Target raising by target-achieving industries

All six industries raised their targets for the current fiscal year. Among them, the following four industries raised their targets over their performance levels.

(1) Japan Chemical Industry Association, (2) Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, (3) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, (4) Japan Copper and Brass Association

（3）Target setting combined with CO2 emissions

The Lime Manufacture Association set its targets in terms of CO2 emissions. (4) Main matters pointed out

[Japan Chemical Industry Association] ・ We welcome the fact that the association has raised its targets to a level higher than

its performance levels. ・ It is within the boundary of feasibility that the association will achieve its targets. As

CO2 emissions are expected to increase due to an increase in production output, higher targets should be set.

[Nonferrous metal sectors] ・ As the nonferrous metal sector is a materials industry, it has a tendency to be

influenced by manufacturers. However, we appreciate the fact that the industry is making efforts despite the difficulties in implementing reduction plans. ・ Production output is expected to increase in the future and as such production-related

techniques and cost reduction processes are essential. ・ While it is good for respective industries to work towards optimization, given cases

wherein materials industries are contributing to CO2 reduction when products are used, follow-ups will also require discussions concerning overall optimization.

17

Electronics, Electrical Equipment, and Industrial Machinery WG Summary of Chair’s Report

November 5, 2007 Electronics, Electrical Equipment, and Industrial Machinery WG

Chair: Hisashi Ishitani 1. Time and Date of WG Meeting ・Time and date: October 17, 2007 (Thu) 9:00~12:00 ・Venue: Aso-no-Ma, Asahi-no-Ma, Tokai-no-Ma and Miho-no-Ma of Tokai University Koyu

Kaikan (alumni hall) 2. Members (Present) [Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Ishitani (Chair), Kakuta, Matsuo [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Fujie (Absent) [Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Akiyama, Kajimura, Goto [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Shimada 3. Industries covered by deliberations (five industries)

Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association


At the beginning of the deliberations, the chairman made the following statements concerning voluntary action plans: ・ As Japan’s representative export industries, they maintain world-leading competitiveness thanks

to their high performance and reliability. They are critical industries in their support of the Japanese economy as well as their securing of energy resources. On the other hand, these

18

industries are aggressively engaged in energy-related environmental preservation amid fierce competition, and are playing important roles in terms of CO2 reduction. ・ On the one hand, each industry’s efforts towards energy conservation and CO2 reduction also

constitute a factor in outpacing the competition. As such, they should continue to promote CO2 reduction. ・ In sum, they are industries that manufacture products used for final energy consumption and are

characterized not only by their high performance but also by their energy conservation rates. They are contributing to energy conservation and CO2 reduction worldwide by way of expanding energy-saving products on a global scale. Incidentally, even if the energy consumption of these products increases to some extent during the manufacturing process, their major energy-saving effect is very often demonstrated by the achievement of energy conservation at the point of use. Evaluation of energy-saving functions throughout the lifecycle of such products is also important. ・ In future, the setting absolute CO2 emission-based reduction targets should be considered in

addition to energy consumption intensity-based targets.

(1) Progress of voluntary action plans The targets of the four electric and electronic industry associations and the Japan Bearing

Industrial Association concern CO2 emission intensity, and those of the Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers concern CO2 emissions, and those of the Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association concern energy consumption intensity, and the Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association has targets for both energy consumption and energy consumption intensity. Their performances to date are as follows.

Target-achieving industries

(1) 4 electrical/electronics-related groups, (2) Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association

Target-missing industries (1) Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, (2) Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, (3) Japan Bearing Industrial Association


○The four electric and electronic industry associations raised their targets to levels higher than performance levels.


○The Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers The achievement of its goal is considered to be within the bounds of feasibility through the

renewal of compressors, improvement of power-related facilities, renewal of transformers, introduction of high-efficiency equipment, etc.

In cases wherein the achievement of targets is appears difficult, the society is now studying

19

concrete measures, including the utilization of the Kyoto Mechanism. ○The Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association

The achievement of its goal is considered to be within the bounds of feasibility through energy-efficient lighting and air conditioning equipment, introduction of energy management systems, introducing cogeneration equipment, etc.

In cases wherein the achievement of targets appears difficult, the society is now studying concrete measures, including the utilization of the Kyoto Mechanism, although specific acquisition methods in regards to the amount of credits to be purchased and the timing of said purchases have yet to be determined.

○The Japan Bearing Industrial Association

The achievement of its goal is considered to be within the bounds of feasibility through measures such as promoting inverter production facilities, strengthening the thermal insulation performance of heat-treating furnaces, improving operating rates, and providing proper maintenance of mechanical equipment.

Through energy conservation measures, the association is expecting improvements in excess of its goal. As such, it is not considering utilizing the Kyoto Mechanism.

(4) Main points pointed out

[The four electric and electronic industry associations] ・ Given factors leading to energy increases, a further raising of targets to levels higher

than performance levels can be commended. ・ Further enhancement of targets should be considered.

[The Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, the Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, the Japan Bearing Industrial Association] ・ These organizations again failed to achieve their targets for this fiscal year. Further

efforts towards achieving targets should be made.

[The Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association] ・ The association has achieved its targets for two consecutive years. Its targets should

be raised as soon as possible.

20

Automobile, Auto Parts and Auto Body WG Summary of Chair’s Report

November 5, 2007

Automobile, Auto Parts and Auto Body WG Chair: Hisashi Ishitani

1. Time and Date of WG Meeting ・Time and date: October 17, 2007 (Thu) 9:00~12:00 ・Venue: Aso-no-Ma, Asahi-no-Ma, Tokai-no-Ma and Miho-no-Ma of Tokai University Koyu

Kaikan (alumni hall)


Ishitani (Chair), Kakuta, Matsuo [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Kobayashi (Absent) [Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Akiyama, Kurihara, Nagata [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Shimada

3. Industries covered by deliberations (four industries) Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association

4. Results of deliberations At the beginning of the deliberations, the chairman made the following statements concerning

voluntary action plans: ・ As Japan’s representative export industries, these industries have maintained world-leading

competitiveness thanks to their high performance and reliability. These are industries that support the Japanese economy. Their efforts in promoting energy preservation and CO2 reductions also constitute an important factor in outclassing the competition. As such, they

21

should continue to promote CO2 reductions. ・ These industries manufacture end products whose high energy saving performance surpasses

all others in the world. They are contributing to CO2 reductions in the commercial and transport sectors at the usage stage.

(1) Progress of voluntary action plans These four industries have defined their goals in terms of reduction of CO2 emissions in comparison with the corresponding fiscal 1990 levels. Of these, one industry achieved its target but the remaining three have yet to achieve their targets.

Target-achieving industries: Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association Target-missing industries: Japan Auto Parts Industries Association,

Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association


○The Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association raised its targets for this fiscal year (less than performance levels).

(3) Enhancement of target-missing industries’ likelihood of achieving targets ○Japan Auto Parts Industries Association

Through measures such as the operational management of facilities, improvement of production lines, introduction of energy-saving facilities, and energy switching, achievement of targets by the association is considered to be within the range of feasibility.

The association states that in cases wherein the achievement of targets proves difficult, it will aim at achieving its targets by utilizing Kyoto Mechanism Credits. ○Japan Auto-Body Industries Association

Through early renewal of existing facilities such as paint booth air conditioning, the introduction of cogeneration equipment, boiler renewal etc., achievement of targets by the association is considered to be within the range of feasibility.

The association states that in cases wherein the achievement of targets proves difficult, it will aim at achieving its targets by utilizing Kyoto Mechanism Credits. ○Japan Industrial Vehicles Association

Through fuel switching and lighting equipment renewal etc., target achievement by the association is considered to be within the range of feasibility.

The association states that in cases wherein the achievement of targets is difficult, it will aim to achieve its targets by utilizing Kyoto Mechanism Credits.

(4) Main matters pointed out [Automobile-related industries] ・ All four automobile-related industries can be highly commended in that they are

defining targets in terms of CO2 emissions rather than energy consumption intensity.

22

・ They should study whether they can set targets in terms of total energy consumption, from auto parts to finished automobiles.

[Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association ・ The fact is that the association is further raising its targets without changing its

performance indicators based on total CO2 emissions. ・ The association should raise its targets above its performance levels in order to

maintain its 25% reduction over the 1990 levels.

[Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association] ・ Although the associations are facing challenges such as advanced auto parts and

increasing exports, their target-achieving efforts should be watched.

23

Distribution and Service WG Summary of Chair’s Report

November 5, 2007

Distribution WG Chair: Hidetoshi Nakagami

1. Time and Date of WG Meeting ・Time and date: October 17, 2007 (Thu) 9:00~12:00 ・Venue: Aso-no-Ma, Asahi-no-Ma, Tokai-no-Ma and Miho-no-Ma of Tokai University Koyu

Kaikan (alumni hall)


Nakagami (Chair), Uchida, Ehara [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Ogawa (Absent) [Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy]

Nakada, Hyodo [Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Central Environment Council]

Miura

3. Industries covered by deliberations (Nine industries) Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, Japan Leasing Association, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers, Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc.

Participating in the follow-ups for the first time: Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc. Formulated voluntary action plans for the first time:

Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, Japan Leasing Association, Council for Large Household Appliance Retailers

24

4. Results of deliberations At the beginning of the deliberations, the chairman made the following statements concerning

voluntary action plans: ・ It is important in practical terms that the distribution industry’s anti-warming measures not

cause inconvenience and discomfort to consumers. It is not only business operators’ efforts that count, but also consumers’ understanding. Dissemination of such measures and the enlightenment of consumers are essential. ・ While business managers’ understanding of anti-warming measures is deepening, we can see

an increase in the number of cases wherein ESCO is introduced at each industry in addition to an aggressive installment of energy-saving equipment. ・ Starting from this fiscal year, four new industries participated for the first time and it is hoped

that the number of new entrants will continue to increase.

(1) Progress of voluntary action plans Target-achieving industries (five industries): Japan Chain Stores Association,

Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan DIY Industry Association

Target-missing industries (one industry): Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc. (2) Target-raising by target-achieving industries

The following two industries raised their targets for the current fiscal year (below their performance levels)

(1) Japan Department Stores Association, (2) Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores (3) Enhancement of target-missing industries’ likelihood of achieving targets ○Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc.

The council is expected to achieve its targets through introduction of energy-saving equipment, etc.

In cases wherein the achievement of targets proves to be difficult, the council plans to consider measures including the utilization of Kyoto Mechanism Credits, but the specific acquisition method with regards to the amount of credits to be purchased and the timing of said purchases has yet to be determined.

(4) Principal matters highlighted • This year, the Japan Department Stores Association raised its target value whereas the Japan

Franchise Association left its target value unchanged for the current year, although it raised its target value last year. We can understand the circumstances under which the target value was frozen.

• The distribution industry’s efforts give us an impression that the industry is doing well. The industry should publicize its aggressive efforts.

• As for the retailing and services industries, it must be considered that production coincides with

25

consumption in these industries and that consumers participate in production. The argument that household energy consumption is traded off should be recognized. Therefore, we cannot easily say that business hours is the problem.

• As for chain stores, convenience stores, department stores, etc., there are significant disparities between the efforts undertaken by individual outlets. There is still room to reduce CO2 and efforts to this end should be enhanced. Chain and convenience stores have set their targets lower than their performance level for the past five years, and need to put forth a more serious effort.

• Further actions should be promoted by way of adopting outside diagnoses on energy conservation.

• The department store industry is presenting maximum and minimum values in regards to energy consumption intensity by size of outlet. Other associations should also present such data, which is important.

• Although energy consumption intensity by floor area and business hours are used as performance indicators, longer business hours make it easier to achieve targets. As such, questions arise as to whether truly serious thought is being given to CO2 reductions.

• The distribution industry serves as a final distributor in the supply chain, and the distribution industry should make further efforts in terms of distribution as the manner in which it procures merchandise from various industries affects the distribution efficiency in industries.

• The parking lots of department stores are free of charge, but going to the department store by train run by an affiliate railway company costs more. This contradiction should be improved.

• There are many areas which are not yet covered, such as vending machines and video game arcades. Rather than focusing on industries whose efforts were reported as problematic, efforts to increase coverage of other industries should be continued.

26

III. Results of the Fiscal 2007 Follow-Ups

Of the 39 industries covered by this fiscal year’s Follow-up, 25 industries achieved their targets and 14 industries have yet to achieve their targets in the FY 2006 performance.

Eighteen out of the 25 industries that have achieved their targets raised their targets.

Summary evaluation results for this fiscal year are as follows: 1. Outline of evaluation results

☆S 5 industry

☆A 8 industries

☆B 2 industries

☆C 3 industries

◎S 3 industries

◎A 1 industry

◎B －

◎C 3 industries

○

Industries judged as being fully able toachieve targets, with improvementsmaking steady progress or the contents andeffects of their future measures shown inspecific and quantitative terms

5 industriesPrevious FY8 industries

○ 3 industries

△Industries judged as having a hard timeachieving targets under current conditionsbut being able to achieve the targets byfully implementing future measures


△ 8 industries

×Industries judged as having a hard timeachieving the target under currentconditions

‐

Previous FYNo industry

× -

Industries that have formulated theirvoluntary action plans for this fiscal yearbut have yet to achieve their targets

3 industriesPrevious FYNo industry

○ or △ 3 industries

Indu

stry

yet

to a

chie

ve ta

rget

◎

Indu

stry

ach

ievi

ngta

rget Industries that have already achieved their

target


Classification from perspective of likelihood to achieve target Evaluation indicator for thisfiscal year

18 industriesPrevious FY8 industry

Industries that have raised ther target thisyear after having achieved their existingtarget

Indu

stry

rais

ing

targ

et

☆

(Note 1)

(Note 2)

27

(Note 1) ☆: Industries that raised their targets this year after having achieved existing targets are labeled as S, A, B, or C based on the following two requirements.

①: CO2 emissions decreased from base year, ②: Level of new targets is higher than fiscal 2005 performance

☆S: CO2 emissions decreased from the base year and the level of the new target is higher than fiscal

2006 performance (Industries meeting requirements ① and ②) ☆A: CO2 emissions decreased from the base year but the level of the new target is lower than fiscal

2006 performance (Industries meeting only requirement ①) ☆B: CO2 emissions increased from the base year but the level of the new target is higher than fiscal

2006 performance (Industries meeting only requirement ②) ☆C: CO2 emissions increased from the base year and the level of the new target is lower than fiscal

2006 performance (Industries meeting neither requirement ① nor ②) (Note 2) ◎: Industries that have already achieved their target (excluding those that have raised their

targets) are labeled as S, A, B, or C based on the following two requirements. ①: CO2 emissions decreased from the base year, ②: Successive achievement period up to fiscal 2005 is 1~2 years

◎S: CO2 emissions decreased from the base year and the successive achievement period is 1~2

years (Industries meeting requirements ① and ②) ◎A: CO2 emissions decreased from the base year but the successive achievement period is 3 years

or longer (Industries meeting only requirement ①) ◎B: CO2 emissions increased from the base year but the successive achievement period is 1~2 years

(Industries meeting only requirement ②) ◎C: CO2 emissions increased from the base year and the successive achievement period is 3 years

or longer (Industries meeting neither requirement ① nor ②)

※Evaluation of industries setting multiple targets With regards to industries that have established multiple performance indicators, if the evaluation of one

performance indicator differs from that of the other, the results from the lower evaluation will be adopted for the industries in question under the basic principle that “all target indices need to be achieved.”

28

CO

2 em

issi

ons r

educ

tion

(com

paris

on w

ith b

ase

year

)C

O2

emis

sion

s red

uctio

n (c

ompa

rison

with

bas

e ye

ar)

Target achieved Target achieved

Target yet to be achieved Target yet to be achieved

Incr

ease

in C

O2

emis

sion

s (co

mpa

rison

with

bas

e ye

ar)

Incr

ease

in C

O2

emis

sion

s (co

mpa

rison

with

bas

e ye

ar)

▲8.

4▲

20.3

▲10

.5▲

17.9

▲3.

9

▲25

.4▲

71.4

▲12

.0▲

23.7

▲52

.7

▲30

.1▲

4.8

▲0.

8

▲6.

6▲

21.4

▲12

.3

▲42

.1

+ 17

.9

+ 20

.5+

56.8

+ 7

.3+

10.9

+ 26

.0

+ 7

.2

Cha

nges

in C

O2

emis

sion

s (%

)

▲5.

1

▲25

.9

▲2.

4

▲2.

8

+

9.0

+ 6

6.0

+ 3

1.3

+ 7

7.8

+ 1

2.0

+ 9

5.0

+205

.6+1

,590

.9

FY20

07 F

ollo

wFY

2007

Fol

low

-- Ups

to V

olun

tary

Act

ion

Plan

sU

ps to

Vol

unta

ry A

ctio

n Pl

ans

-- Sta

tus o

f Eac

h In

dust

ry’s

Tar

get A

chie

vem

ent a

nd C

hang

es in

CO

2 Em

issi

ons f

rom

Bas

e Y

ear-

△

☆Ｓ

☆Ａ

1.Ja

pan

Pape

r Ass

ocia

tion

(ene

rgy

inte

nsity

, CO

2 em

issi

on in

tens

ity)

2.Ja

pan

Cem

ent A

ssoc

iatio

n(e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

3.3.Ja

pan

Cop

per

and

Bra

ss A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y in

tens

ityJa

pan

Cop

per

and

Bra

ss A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y in

tens

ity））

4.4.Ja

pane

se E

lect

ric

Wir

e &

Cab

le M

aker

sJa

pane

se E

lect

ric

Wir

e &

Cab

le M

aker

s ’’A

ssoc

iatio

n A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n (m

etal

wir

e), e

nerg

y in

tens

ity (

fiber

opt

ic(e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n (m

etal

wir

e), e

nerg

y in

tens

ity (

fiber

opt

icca

ble)

)ca

ble)

)5.

Japa

n R

ubbe

r Man

ufac

ture

rs A

ssoc

iatio

n(e

nerg

y in

tens

ity,

CO

2 em

issi

ons)

6.Ja

pan

Aut

omob

ile M

anuf

actu

rers

Ass

ocia

tion

(CO

2 em

issi

ons)

7.

Japa

n G

as A

ssoc

iatio

n(C

O2

emis

sion

inte

nsity

, CO

2 em

issi

ons)

8.

Lim

e M

anuf

actu

re A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n)

9.Fl

at G

lass

Man

ufac

ture

rs A

ssoc

iatio

n of

Japa

n (e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n, C

O2

emis

sion

s)10

.10

.Ja

pan

Tex

tile

Fini

sher

sJa

pan

Tex

tile

Fini

sher

s ’’A

ssoc

iatio

n A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n, C

O2

emis

sion

s)(e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n, C

O2

emis

sion

s)11

.Ja

pan

Sani

tary

Equ

ipm

ent I

ndus

try A

ssoc

iatio

n (C

O2

emis

sion

s)

12.

Japa

n A

lum

iniu

mA

ssoc

iatio

n(e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

13.

Japa

n M

inin

g In

dust

ry A

ssoc

iatio

n(e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

14.

Japa

n C

onst

ruct

ion

Equi

pmen

t Man

ufac

ture

rs A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

15.

Lim

esto

ne A

ssoc

iatio

n of

Japa

n(e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

16.

Japa

n D

IY In

dust

ry A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

17.

Japa

n G

lass

Bot

tle A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n, C

O2

emis

sion

s)

◎S

◎A

☆Ｂ

☆C

1.Ja

pan

Che

mic

al In

dust

ry A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

2.2.4

elec

tric

al/e

lect

roni

cs4

elec

tric

al/e

lect

roni

cs-- r

elat

ed g

roup

s (C

O2

emis

sion

inte

nsity

)re

late

d gr

oups

(CO

2 em

issi

on in

tens

ity)

3.Pe

trole

um A

ssoc

iatio

n of

Japa

n(e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

4.4.Ja

pan

Dep

artm

ent S

tore

s Ass

ocia

tion

(ene

rgy

inte

nsity

)Ja

pan

Dep

artm

ent S

tore

s Ass

ocia

tion

(ene

rgy

inte

nsity

)5.

Japa

n A

ssoc

iatio

n of

Cha

in D

rug

Stor

es (e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

6.Ja

pan

Cha

in S

tore

s Ass

ocia

tion

(ene

rgy

inte

nsity

) 7.

Japa

n Fr

anch

ise

Ass

ocia

tion

(ene

rgy

inte

nsity

) 8.

Pow

er P

rodu

cer a

nd S

uppl

ier (

CO2

emis

sion

inte

nsity

)

Red

: Ind

ustri

es th

at ra

ised

targ

ets i

n bo

th

FY 2

006

and

FY 2

007

◎C

○ 1

Japa

n Ir

on a

nd S

teel

Fed

erat

ion

(ene

rgy

cons

umpt

ion)

2

Japa

n Fo

reig

n Tr

ade

Cou

ncil,

Inc.

(CO

2 em

issi

ons)

3

Japa

n B

earin

g In

dust

rial A

ssoc

iatio

n (C

O2

emis

sion

inte

nsity

)

1 Ja

pan

Aut

o Pa

rts In

dust

ries A

ssoc

iatio

n(C

O2

emis

sion

inte

nsity

, CO

2 em

issi

on)

2

Japa

n So

ciet

y of

Indu

stria

l Mac

hine

ry M

anuf

actu

rers

(C

O2

emis

sion

s)

3Fe

dera

tion

of E

lect

ric P

ower

Com

pani

es o

f Jap

an(C

O2

emis

sion

inte

nsity

) 4

Japa

n Pe

trole

um D

evel

opm

ent A

ssoc

iatio

n(C

O2

emis

sion

inte

nsity

) 5

Japa

n LP

Gas

Ass

ocia

tion

6 Ja

pan

Aut

o-B

ody

Indu

strie

s Ass

ocia

tion

(CO

2 em

issi

ons)

7Ja

pan

Mac

hine

Too

l Bui

lder

s’A

ssoc

iatio

n (e

nerg

y in

tens

ity, e

nerg

y co

nsum

ptio

n)8

Japa

n In

dust

rial V

ehic

les A

ssoc

iatio

n(C

O2

emis

sion

s)

Mee

ting

of L

arge

Hou

seho

ld A

pplia

nce

Ret

aile

rs (e

nerg

y in

tens

ity)

Japa

n In

form

atio

n Te

chno

logy

Ser

vice

s Ind

ustry

Ass

ocia

tion

(ene

rgy

inte

nsity

)Ja

pan

Leas

ing

Ass

ocia

tion

(ene

rgy

inte

nsity

)

○or

△:

☆: :

Targ

et-r

aisi

ng in

dust

ry

◎: T

arge

t-ach

ievi

ng in

dust

ry

○, △

: Ind

ustri

es y

et to

ach

ieve

targ

et

Targ

et-a

chie

ving

indu

strie

s are

eva

luat

ed a

s S, A

, B o

r C b

ased

on

the

requ

irem

ents

, suc

h as

cha

nges

in C

O2

emis

sion

s and

the

leve

l of t

arge

t rai

sed.

29

2. Evaluation of Follow-Up by Scope (1) Target Raising by target-achieving industries

In the follow-up for this fiscal year, 18 out of the 25 industries that have already achieved

their targets have raised their targets. Among these, seven industries set new targets at levels higher that their fiscal 2006 performance and these industries were proactively evaluated. On the other hand, 11 industries set new targets at levels lower than their fiscal 2006 performance while seven industries failed to raise their targets. (Refer to attachment “3. Target-Raising by Target-Achieving Industries”)

The status of each industry’s target achievement and target raising is shown below. In this

fiscal year, industries that set targets in terms of energy consumption intensity in particular have been called upon to raise their targets to levels above their performance levels while paying attention to the targets under the Energy Saving Act in regards to long- and medium-term improvements in energy consumption intensity at factories and business offices by over 1% on average on a yearly basis. As a result, of the target achieving industries that set intensity targets that include CO2 emission intensity, ten industries raised their targets, but only five of them raised targets to levels higher than their performance levels.

FY2007 Follow-Ups to Voluntary Action Plans Outline of Each Industry

Industries with intensity targets (23 industries)

Industries with total amount targets(16 industries)Underlined: Industries with CO2 emissions targets (13 industries)

Rai

sing

targ

ets

(18

indu

strie

s) Abo

ve

perf

orm

ance

(7in

dust

ries)

Bel

ow

perf

orm

ance

(1

1 in

dust

ries)

Target-achieving(7 industries)

Target-missing(14 industries)

※Industries shown in parentheses formulated new plans this fiscal year

※39 industries are covered by the current year’s Follow-Up for industries under the jurisdiction of the METI

Japan Iron and Steel FederationJapan Auto Parts Industries AssociationJapan Auto-Body Industries AssociationJapan Industrial Vehicles AssociationJapan Machine Tool Builders’ AssociationJapan Society of Industrial Machinery ManufacturersJapan Foreign Trade Council, Inc.

Federation of Electric Power Companies of JapanJapan Petroleum Development AssociationJapan LP Gas AssociationJapan Bearing Industrial Association Japan Information Technology Services Industry AssociationJapan Leasing Association Association of Large Household Appliance Retailers

Japan Glass Bottle AssociationLimestone Association of JapanJapan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association Japan Chain Stores AssociationJapan DIY Industry Association Japan Franchise Association

Power Producers and Suppliers

Japan Automobile Manufacturers AssociationJapan Gas AssociationFlat Glass Manufacturers Association of JapanLime Manufacture AssociationJapan Textile Finishers’ AssociationJapan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association

Petroleum Association of JapanJapan Mining Industry AssociationJapan Department Stores Association Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores Japan Aluminium Association

Japan Rubber Manufacturers AssociationJapanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association

[five industries]Japan Chemical Industry Association4 electrical/electronics-related groups Japan Paper Association

Japan Cement AssociationJapan Copper and Brass Association[five industries]

[six industries]

[seven industries]

[two industries]

[six industries]

[one industry]

[seven industries]

※Excluding industries that have raised targets

30

As a result, according to the current forecast, the additional reduction effect of the 18

industries’ target-raising for this fiscal year is estimated at about 15.7 million tons, as outlined below.

Also, additional reduction effects since the formulation of the Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement Plan are estimated at about 18 million tons, including the effects of last year’s target-raising by eight industries

(Note) Given that the estimates were calculated using each industry’s forecasted production output, energy use, etc. at face value, they represent calculated values requiring further scrutiny.

Outline of target raising

<<FY 2007>> 18 industries, approx. 15.7 million tons

(*including five industries that raised targets in both FY2006 and FY2007) Underlined: industries that raised targets above their performance levels (1) Japan Chemical Industry Association, (2) Four electrical/electronics-related groups*, (3) Japan Paper Association, (4) Petroleum Association of Japan, (5) Japan Gas Association, (6) Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, (7) Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, (8) Japan Cement Association, (9) Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, (10) Japan Mining Industry Association, (11) Lime Manufacture Association, (12) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association*, (13) Japan Department Stores Association *, (14) Japan Textile Finishers' Association*, (15) Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores,

(16) Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, (17) Japan Aluminium Association,

(18) Japan Copper and Brass Association* (Note) Calculation of the reduction effects in the distribution industry and other industries in the

business/commercial sector is based on the assumption that energy-efficiency equipment in accordance with the existing target achievement plan is being introduced. Close examinations should be made with this in mind.

(Reference) <<FY 2006>> 8 industries, approx. 2.84 million tons

(1) Four electrical/electronics-related groups, (2) Japan Franchise Association, (3) Japan Glass Bottle Association, (4) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association,(5) Japan Textile Finishers' Association, (6) Japan Chain Stores Association, (7) Japan Department Stores Association, (8) Japan Copper and Brass Association

[Total]

Number of industries: 21 industries (including five industries that raised targets in both FY 2006 and FY 2007)

Reduction effect: Approx. 18 million tons

31

Targets Raised in FY2007

11.612% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Mining Industry Association9

18.5 8% reduction over the FY1990 levelMaintain the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Rubber Manufacturers Association7

Optic fiber cable

Metal wire

77% reduction over the FY1990 level75% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensity6.6

27% reduction over the FY1990 level20% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionJapanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association12

5.2※15% reduction over the FY2004 levelNo change from the FY2004 levelEnergy intensityJapan Association of Chain Drug Stores15

6.2※6% reduction over the FY1990 level3% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Department Stores Association13

228.535% reduction over the FY1990 level28% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emission intensity4 electrical/electronics-related groups2

19.0 0.54 million t-CO2(59% reduction over the FY1990 level)

0.73 million t-CO2(46% reduction over the FY1990 level)CO2 emissionsJapan Gas Association6

0.2 9.05% reduction over the FY1995 level8.6% reduction over the FY1995 levelEnergy intensityJapan Copper and Brass Association18

1.8 11% reduction over the FY1995 level10% reduction over the FY1995 levelEnergy intensityJapan Aluminum Association 17

2.4 25% reduction over the FY1990 level20% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association16

5.8 41% reduction over the FY1990 level4% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Textile Finishers' Association14

7.1 8% reduction over the FY1990 level6% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionLimestone Association of Japan11

10.5 21% reduction over the FY1990 level15% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionFlat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan10

17.8 3.8% reduction over the FY1990 level3% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Cement Association8

19.012.5% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Automobile Manufacturers Association5

139.3 13% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityPetroleum Association of Japan4

217.4 20% reduction over the FY1990 level13% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Paper Association3

856.3 20% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Chemical Industry Association1

Reduction effect

(10,000t-CO2)New targetsExisting targetsPerformance

indicatorIndustry

11.612% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Mining Industry Association9

18.5 8% reduction over the FY1990 levelMaintain the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Rubber Manufacturers Association7

Optic fiber cable

Metal wire

77% reduction over the FY1990 level75% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensity6.6

27% reduction over the FY1990 level20% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionJapanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association12

5.2※15% reduction over the FY2004 levelNo change from the FY2004 levelEnergy intensityJapan Association of Chain Drug Stores15

6.2※6% reduction over the FY1990 level3% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Department Stores Association13

228.535% reduction over the FY1990 level28% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emission intensity4 electrical/electronics-related groups2

19.0 0.54 million t-CO2(59% reduction over the FY1990 level)

0.73 million t-CO2(46% reduction over the FY1990 level)CO2 emissionsJapan Gas Association6

0.2 9.05% reduction over the FY1995 level8.6% reduction over the FY1995 levelEnergy intensityJapan Copper and Brass Association18

1.8 11% reduction over the FY1995 level10% reduction over the FY1995 levelEnergy intensityJapan Aluminum Association 17

2.4 25% reduction over the FY1990 level20% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association16

5.8 41% reduction over the FY1990 level4% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Textile Finishers' Association14

7.1 8% reduction over the FY1990 level6% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionLimestone Association of Japan11

10.5 21% reduction over the FY1990 level15% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionFlat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan10

17.8 3.8% reduction over the FY1990 level3% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Cement Association8

19.012.5% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Automobile Manufacturers Association5

139.3 13% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityPetroleum Association of Japan4

217.4 20% reduction over the FY1990 level13% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Paper Association3

856.3 20% reduction over the FY1990 level10% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Chemical Industry Association1

Reduction effect

(10,000t-CO2)New targetsExisting targetsPerformance

indicatorIndustry

Total 1,573.4

(Reference) Targets Raised in FY2006)

Optic fiber cable

Metal wire

0.7 8.6% reduction over the FY1995 level

7.5% reduction over the FY1995 levelEnergy intensityJapan Copper and Brass Association8

5.3※3% reduction over the FY1990 level

Reduction to the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Department Stores Association7


Reduction to the FY1996 levelEnergy intensityJapan Chain Stores Association6

26.340% reduction over the FY1990 level

37% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Textile Finishers' Association5

75% reduction over the FY1990 level

35% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensity

31.2


Reduction to the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionJapanese Electric

Wire & Cable Makers’Association

4

48.9 40% reduction over the FY1990 level

21.5% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Glass Bottle Association3


Reduction to the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Franchise Association2


25% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emission intensity4 electrical/electronics-related groups1

(10,000t-CO2)

Reduction effectNew targetsExisting targetsPerformance

indicatorIndustry

Optic fiber cable

Metal wire

0.7 8.6% reduction over the FY1995 level

7.5% reduction over the FY1995 levelEnergy intensityJapan Copper and Brass Association8


Reduction to the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Department Stores Association7


Reduction to the FY1996 levelEnergy intensityJapan Chain Stores Association6


37% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Textile Finishers' Association5


35% reduction over the FY1990 levelEnergy intensity

31.2


Reduction to the FY1990 levelEnergy consumptionJapanese Electric

Wire & Cable Makers’Association

4

48.9 40% reduction over the FY1990 level

21.5% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emissionsJapan Glass Bottle Association3


Reduction to the FY1990 levelEnergy intensityJapan Franchise Association2


25% reduction over the FY1990 levelCO2 emission intensity4 electrical/electronics-related groups1

(10,000t-CO2)

Reduction effectNew targetsExisting targetsPerformance

indicatorIndustry

Total 284.3

※ Including reduction effects based on existing measures under the existing target achievement plan

32


As for industries that have yet to achieve their targets, they have been encouraged, from the standpoint of enhancing likelihood of achieving targets, to give quantitative explanations about the contents and effects of their future measures (including utilization of the Kyoto Mechanism) so as to compensate for the extent to which they failed to meet their targets (basic units and amounts required for achievements).

Target-missing industries covered by this fiscal year’s Follow-Up as a whole are judged as being able to achieve their targets, given that they are now providing more in the way of quantitative and specific explanations than ever before as seen in their presentation of future measures’ effects in comparison with the non-achievement margin. In this context, plans to use the Kyoto Mechanism Credits were reported. In particular, the electric power, and iron and steel industries announced significant increases in their utilization of Kyoto Mechanism Credits exceeding the previous fiscal year’s level, as outlined below.

Refer to attachment “2. Target-Missing Industries’ Likelihood of Achieving Target” for the outline of contents and effects of future measures for compensating for extent of non-achievement.

Amount of Kyoto Mechanism Credits scheduled for acquisition

Industry Planned utilization of Kyoto Mechanism

as reported at this fiscal year’s

Follow-Up.

Planned utilization of Kyoto Mechanism

as reported at last fiscal year’s Follow-Up.

Federation of Electric

Power Companies of

Japan

Approx. 120 million t-CO2

（Five years from FY 2008 to FY 2012）

Approx. 30 million t- CO2

（Three years from FY 2008 to FY 2010）

Japan Iron and Steel

Federation

Approx. 44 million t-CO2


Approx. 28million t-CO2


33

(3) Target-setting with the inclusion of CO2 emissions In light of the fact that the Kyoto Protocol’s target is CO2 emissions, industries that define

their targets in terms of CO2 emission intensity have been asked to also study the use of CO2 emissions as a performance indicator.

As a result, two industries (the Flat Glass Manufactures Association of Japan and the Lime Manufacturers’ Association) set new targets for this fiscal year in terms of emissions. However, the industries that established performance figures for this fiscal year in terms of CO2 emissions remained limited to the above-mentioned two, due in part to difficulty in projecting the future production output.

Meanwhile, the performance indicators for 39 industries covered by the Follow-Up are shown in the table in (1) “FY 2007 Follow-Ups to Voluntary Action Plans Outline of Each Industry” (For details, refer to attachment “4 Setting Targets Combining CO2 Emissions”

Changes in target-setting in terms of CO2 reduction during the past five years

FY 2003 FY 2004 FY 2005 FY 2006 FY 2007 Number of industries setting multiple targets

7 9 ( ① Japan Industrial Vehicles Association and ② Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association participated in METI Follow-Up)

10 (① Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers changed its targets to those in terms of CO2 reductions.)

10 13 (①Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan and ②Lime Manufacture Association set new targets in terms of CO2 emissions set ③ Japan Foreign Trade Council, Inc participated in METI Follow-Up)

（ Total of participating industries）

31 30 32 33 39

34

(4) Relations with Global Warming Law

As for CO2 emissions, etc., preconditions for evaluation of each industry’s voluntary action

plans, industry-by-industry formulation and management are, in principle, being conducted. Starting from this fiscal year, industries have been asked to include CO2 emissions in their

list of corporations (all business establishments) participating in the voluntary actions plans in line with the mandatory greenhouse gas accounting and reporting system under the Global Warming Law. Outlined below is the status of submission of such lists pertaining to 35 industries, apart from four industries* that reported that they have no business establishments subject to the law.

*Industries without business establishments subject to the Global Warming Law (four industries) Japan Franchise Association, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan Leasing Association

Fourteen industries did not disclose CO2 emissions by business establishment or corporation. The number of business establishments covered by the Global Warming Law in the

voluntary action plans, out of all industries participating in voluntary action plans, was also identified. (Refer to attachment “1 Proportion of Business Establishments covered by the Global Warming Law, out of Those Corporations Participating in the Voluntary Actions Plan.”)

○ The Status of Submission of Lists of Corporations Participating in the Voluntary Actions Plans

(Note) The figures shown in parenthesis following the names of industries represent the number of business establishments participating in voluntary action plans.

①Industries disclosing CO2 emissions by business establishment (18 industries) Japan Gas Association (234), Japan LP Gas Association (41), Japan Mining Industry Association (21), Limestone Association of Japan (85), Japan Petroleum Development Association (53), Japan Aluminium Association (16), Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association (183), Japan Copper and Brass Association (15), Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan (8), Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association (36), Japan Glass Bottle Association (15), Japan Industrial Vehicles Association (7), Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association (32), Japan Bearing Industrial Association (61), Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association (79), Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers (83), Japan Textile Finishers’ Association (80), Japan Foreign Trade Council (113)

②Industries disclosing CO2 emissions by corporation (3 industries) Petroleum Association of Japan (31), Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association (59), Japan Auto-Body Industries Association (64)

③Industries not disclosing CO2 emissions (14 industries)

・Industries submitting a list of business establishment only (three industries) Japan Iron and Steel Federation (134), Japan Paper Association (106), Japan Cement Association (32)

35

・Industries submitting a list of corporations only (ten industries) 4 electrical/electronics-related groups (1350), Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan (168), Power Producer and Supplier (48), Japan Auto Parts Industries Association (693), Japan Chemical Industry Association (807), Lime Manufacture Association (112), Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association (75), Japan Chain Stores Association (8786), Japan Department Stores Association (277), Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers (1325) ・Industries not submitting any lists (one industry)

Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association (711)

36

3. The status of progress of each industry

Progress of the 39 industries covered by the Follow-Up is summarized in the attachment according to industrial category* under target achievement plan.

* Industrial sectors (manufacturing and nonmanufacturing industry), energy conversion sectors, and business/commercial sectors. The Manufacturing/nonmanufacturing industry is classified into seven industrial categories including the steel industry, the pulp and paper industry, etc.

<Structure of the attachment tables and how to read each column> “Type of industry”

Industries that have achieved their targets are indicated in yellow while those that have yet to achieve their targets are indicated in orange.

“Share of CO2 emissions”

Represents the percentage of CO2 emissions of the industry in question to those of the sector the industry belongs to.

“Percentage of industry category under target achievement plan”

Represents the percentage of energy consumption of the industry in question to those of the category the industry belongs to.

“Percentage of business establishments covered by the Global Warming Law, out of those participating in the Voluntary Actions Plan”

Represents the percentage of business establishments covered by the Global Warming Law and the Energy Saving Law, out of those participating in the voluntary actions plans for the industry in question.

“New targets” to “Base year” columns

Represents the contents of each industry’s target or status of progress. “Target-missing industries’ likelihood of achieving targets”

As for 14 industries that failed to achieve their targets for this fiscal year, responses toward achieving targets in the future are described.

“Target-raising by target-achieving industries”

As for 25 industries that have achieved their targets for this fiscal year, the status of their target-raising is described. ・ (1) Industries that have raised targets to levels above their performance: seven industries (shown in

green) (2) Industries that have raised targets to levels below their performance: 11 industries (shown in

light green) (3) Industries that failed to raise targets: seven industries (shown in red)

・ As for (1), the measures schedule to be implemented is described. ・ As for (1) and (2), raising range from old targets, margin from performance value, relative value

with performance value, trial calculation* of CO2 reduction effect from target raising are shown. ・ Of the abovementioned (2) and (3), in cases where industries setting intensity targets have failed to

raise targets to levels above their performance, reasons are described.

* Given that the estimates were calculated using each industry’s forecasted production output, energy use, etc. at face value, they represent calculated values requiring further scrutiny.

Target-setting with the inclusion of CO2 emissions

Industries that have set total amount targets: 14 industries (shown in light blue) Industries that have newly set total amount targets: two industries (shown in blue) Industries that have adopted intensity targets only: 23 industries (shown in red)

＜Fiscal 2007 Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan: Status by industry＞

4. Target-setting with theinclusion of CO2 emissions

■：Target achieved■：Target yet to beachieved

Number ofestablishments

participating in theVoluntary Action

Plan

Number of companiesbound to the the

Global Warming Lawand the Energy

Saving Law

Ratio of companiesbound to the Laws

to the entirenumber of

participants

■：Target ofenergy intensityonly

■：Targetachieved■：Target yet tobe achieved

■：Target raised(beyond previousperformance)■：Target raised(within range ofprevious performance)

PlanPlanned credit

acquisition under theKyoto Mechanism

■：Raised targets (beyond previous performance)

■：Raised targets (within range of previous performance)

■：Has not raised targets

Difference fromprevious target

Difference fromperformance

(Relative value toperformance)

Estimated effects ofupward revision of

target

■：Gross target determined■：Gross target to be newly setthis year■：Target of intensity only

Iron and Steel

41.8% 100.0% 134 134 100% FY 1990 Energy consumption

（ＰＪ）

(Target yet to beachieved)

+4.8%

Paper and pulp FY 1990 Energy intensity

5.4% 84.0% 106 106 100% （MJ／t）(Target achieved)

-5.5%

FY 1990 CO2 emissionintensity

（t-CO2／t）(Target achieved)

5.6%

Ceramic, stone andclay products

4.8% 51.0% 32 32 100% FY 1990 Energy intensity

（MJ／t）(Target achieved)

-0.01%

Ceramic, stone andclay products 8 8 100% FY 1990 Energy consumption

0.3% 4.0% （10,000 ｋＬ）(Target achieved)

-10%

CO2 emissions(fuel origin)

（10,000 t-CO2） (Target newly set)

Ceramic, stone andclay products 112 50 45% FY 1990 Energy consumption


-6.2%

FY 1990 CO2 emissions

（10,000 t-CO2） (Target newly set)

Ceramic, stone andclay products FY 1990 Energy consumption

0.2% 3.0% 15 15 100% （10,000 ｋＬ）(Target achieved)

-3.4%


（10,000 t-CO2）(Target achieved)

-2.1%

Chemical 807 573 71% FY 1990 Energy intensity

16.0% 100.0%(index)

(Target achieved)+8%

Target

3,478(▲ approx.

3%)

Performanceindicator

2274（▲10%）

12,459（▲13%）

0.895（▲10%）

Base year

354.0

178.0

Type of industry

2527

Base yearperformance

3. Japan CementAssociation

Performanceevaluation forprevious year(See Note 2)

1. Japan Iron andSteel Federation

6. Japan Glass BottleAssociation

4. Flat GlassManufacturers

Association of Japan

Share of CO2emissions

(Proportion tothe industrial,

energyconversion or

business/commercial

sectorsconcerned(FY2005))

Pape

r an

d pu

lpC

eram

ic, s

tone

and

cla

y pr

oduc

tsC

hem

ical

Iron

and

Ste

el

-

-

43.89（▲30%）

41.74（▲33.4%）

107.3（▲40%）

103.6（▲42.1%）

53.5（▲25%）

56.1（▲21%）

135.8（▲24%）

138.8（▲22%）

☆Ａ

◎Ａ

60.9（▲15%）

◎Ｃ

90（▲10%）

62.66

◎Ａ

114.5(▲6%)

3,478(▲3.01%)

3,451（▲3.8%）

11,457（▲20%）

112.1(▲8%)

0.835（▲16%）

-

-

325.7(▲8%)

11,677（▲18.5%）

82（▲18%）

107.0(▲12.2%)

311.6(▲12.0%)

0.839（▲15.6%）

71,000 t-CO2

Target determined（Energy consumption）

80（▲20%）

・Raised targets (beyond previous performance)（Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Improving facilities and operation efficiency of machines, (2)improving operation methods and (3) recovering dischargedenergy. Those measures are anticipated to contribute to thereduction of energy consumption by 830,000 kiloliters in crude oilterms. (investment of 134 billion yen).

2. Japan PaperAssociation

100

71.4

178.8

5. Lime ManufactureAssociation

7. Japan ChemicalIndustry

Association

◎Ｓ

Percentage ofindustry

category undertarget

achievementplan

(See Note 1)(In terms of

energyconsumption)

1.Percentage of business establishmentscovered by the Global Warming Law, out

of those participating in the VoluntaryAction Plan

121.8

14,321

0.994

-

FY 2006performance

New targets2. Target-missing industries' likelihood of achieving targets

2394（▲5.2%）

・Reducing energy consumption by about3.2% from 1990 through energy savingmeasures such as (1) recovery of waste heatand (2) improvement of efficiency of facilities

・Using Kyoto mechanism credits assupplementary measure to cover shortage

Viewpoint of the follow-up of this year and aimed improvements

3. Target-raising by target-achieving industries

・Has not raised targets

7%

・4.4 million t-CO2(8.8 million t-CO2/year) forperiod between 2008 and 2012

・Propotion to base yearemissions：4.3%Proportion to 2006 emissions：4.6%

8.563 milliont-CO2

・Raised targets (beyond previous performance)

（Measures planned for future implementation）・(1) Introducing energy-saving equipment, and (2)Promoting use of alternative energies to reduce theconsumption of fossil fuels by 66,071 (TJ) through ashift from fossil fuels to renewable or waste energies(investment of 186 billion yen)

・Raised tagets (beyond previous performance)（Mesures planned for future implementation)・(1) Promoting the use of waste energies such as wood wastes, (2)improving operation efficiency of facilities such as fans and airconditioners, and (3) installing or remodeling energy-savingfacilities. These measures are anticipated to contribute to thereduction of energy consumption by 80,000 kiloliters per year incrude oil terms.

・Raised targets (within range of previous performance)

（Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Increasing the use of waste fuels and (2) makinginvestment in energy-saving facilities such as renewal offurnace heat exchangers. Those measures areanticipated to contribute to the reduction of energyconsumption by about 16,000 kiloliters in crude oilterms. －

●Intensity target only

Target determined（CO2 emissions）（Newly set）

▲4.2%(▲34.4%)

-

1.5%(8.1%)

3,586

●Target of intensity only

6% 0.4%(2.5%)

0.8% 0.79%(26.2%)

105,000 t-CO2

6%

－ -

10% 2%（11.1%）


（Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Installing waste heat boilers, (2) improvingfacilities and their operation efficiency and (3)introducing energy-saving systems for the coolingprocess. Those measures are anticipated to contributeto the reduction of energy consumption by 2,360kiloliters per year in crude oil terms.

2%


Target determined（CO2 emissions）

Target determined（CO2 emissions）（Newly set）

178,000 t-CO2

2.174 millionｔ－CO2

▲4%(▲16%)

○

◎Ａ

Performanceevaluation forcurrent year(See Note 2)

○

☆Ｓ

☆Ｓ

☆Ａ

☆Ａ

◎Ａ

☆Ｂ

Note 1: Proportion within the industrial category concerned in terms of energy consumption. The industrial categories are configured for the purpose of the target achievement pla (The categorization corresponds to that applied to the General Energy Statistics of Japan. At the time of the establishment of the Plan, there were seven categories, and there are currently eight categories.) Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, Japan Glass Bottle Association and Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, which do not belong to the Keidanren (Japan Federation of Economic Organizations), are included here as constituents of the 20 industrial associations under the jurisdiction of METI as part of the 28 associations of the manufacturing industry covered by the present Plan, since these three Associations are covered by the METI follow-up and their performance data are available in detail. In the future, other associations not shown herein might be added to the Plan, regardless of jurisdiction, depending on availability of performance data.Note 2: Evaluation criteria　　　☆: Industry raising target, ◎: Industry achieving target, ○, △: Industry yet to achieve target　　　Those industries marked ☆ or ◎ which achieved previous targets are to be further evaluated under the criteria of increase/decrease of CO2 emissions as well as the level of new targets and are ranked S, A, B or C accordingly.

Attachments

37


TargetPerformanceindicator

Base yearType of industry Base yearperformance




energyconversion or

business/



achievementplan



FY 2006performance



3. Target-raising by target-achieving industriesPerformanceevaluation forcurrent year(See Note 2)

Machinery 59 59 100% FY 1990 CO2 emissions

1.3% 16.0%


-15.4%

Machinery FY 1990 CO2 emissions

1.6% 20.0% 693 424 61% （10,000 t-CO2）


+4.6%


（10,000 t-CO2／shipment value）(Target achieved)

-7.6%


0.2% 3.0%（10,000 t-CO2）

(Target yet to beachieved)+20.9%


0.01% 0.0%（10,000 t-CO2）


+17%

FY 1997 Energy consumption

Machinery 79 17 22% （10,000 ｋＬ）


+20%

0.1% 1.0%FY 1997 Energy intensity

（L／million yen）(Target achieved)

-18%

Machinery

0.1% 1.0% 32 23 72% FY 1990 Energy intensity

（kL／hundred million yen）(Target achieved)

-15%

Machinery 1350 878 65% FY 1990 CO2 emissionintensity

4.0% 52.0%（t-CO2／million yen）

(Target achieved)-6%

△

△

◎Ｓ

☆Ｃ

△

△

12.52（▲10%）

13.6(▲6%)

131.4(▲6%)

139.8

10. Japan Auto-BodyIndustries

Association

81.8（▲10%）

664.7(▲7%)

12. Japan MachineTool Builders'

Association

13. JapanConstructionEquipment

ManufacturersAssociation

11. Japan IndustrialVehicles Association

8. Japan AutomobileManufacturers

Association

9. Japan Auto PartsIndustries

Association

Man

ufac

turi

ng

Mac

hine

ry

100.8（+10.9%） -

6.55（+7%）

674（▲10%）

◎Ａ

14. Fourelectrical/electronic

s-related groups




1%（2.9%）

7%

0.233（▲28%）

0.214（▲34%）

-

655（▲12.5%）

・Reducing 462,000 tons of CO2 (equivalentto 6.5% of the 1990 emissions) throughenergy saving measures such as (1) facilityoperation control, (2) daily management, (3)improvement of manufacturing process, (4)introduction of energy-saving equipment and(5) use of alternative fuels (This correspondsto 140% of the amount still to be reduced inorder to achieve targets.)

2.5%

Will use credit in the casewhere target achievementbecomes difficult (Nospecific plan on volumeand time)

Will use credit in the casewhere target achievementbecomes difficult

・Reducing 153,000 tons of CO2 (equivalent to 16.9%of the 1990 emissions) through energy-savingmeasures such as (1) air conditioning in paintingrooms, (2) introduction of cogeneration systems, (3)countermeasures against air leaks and (4) renewal ofboilers, as well as near-future renewal of existingfacilities. (This corresponds to 80.5% of the amount yetto be reduced to achieve targets.)

559（▲25.4%）

714.7

749

471.2(▲20%)

13.91

・Reducing 7,012 kiloliters of energyconsumption in crude oil terms (equivalent to4.8% of the energy consumption in the baseyear) through energy-saving measures such as(1) improvement of enegy-saving fuctions oflighting equipment and air conditioners, (2)introduction of energy control systems, and(3) introduction of cogeneration systems.(This corresponds to 23% of the amount stillto be reduced in order to achieve targets.)

Will use credit in the casewhere target achievementbecomes difficult

・Will use credit in the casewhere target achievementbecomes difficult (nospecific plan on volumeand time)

・Reducing 11,000 tons of CO2 (equivalent to 18% ofthe 1990 emissions) through energy-saving measuressuch as (1) use of alternative fuels, (2) renewal oflighting equipment, (3) change of the cogenerationoperation mode and (4) improvement of emission factorof electricity to be purchased. (This corresponds to105% of the amount yet to be reduced to achievetargets.)

・Has raised targets (beyond previous performance)

(Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Improving production processes, (2) introducing high-efficiency machines and equipment, and (3) enhancingoperational control of machines and equipment. Thesemeasures are anticipated to contribute to the CO2 reductionby about 2.6 million tons.


(Reason)・Production has significantly increased due to record-breaking briskbusiness (20.6% increase from 2005 in terms of production value inyen). Energy consumption is estimated to increase by 14.8% from 2006while companies are planning to increase production capacity byinstalling new plants and production lines. Specific targets will bedetermined after production plans of respective companies have beenfinalized.


(Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Introducing energy-saving facilities andimprovement of efficiency of boilers, (2) introducingenergy-saving functions in the painting process and (3)integrating production lines for rationalization andinstalling production line or streamlining of processes.Those measures are anticipated to contribute to theCO2 reduction by 121,000 tons.


-

10.46（▲25%）

5.50（▲10%）

697.8(▲2.4%)

106.8(▲24%)

16.6(+14%)

426.5(▲27.6%)

-

-

-

-

0.211（▲35%）

2.285 milliont-CO2



190,000 t-CO2

▲12.9%(▲50.8%)


589.0

90.9

6.11

0.324

14.5

☆Ａ

△

△

△

△

◎Ｓ

☆Ｂ

38







energyconversion or

business/



achievementplan



FY 2006performance




Non-ferrous metalsand products 16 16 100% FY 1995 Energy intensity

・Planning to reduce about 16,000 tons of CO2 emissions throughintroduction or renewal of energy-saving facilities and machines.


0.1% 8.0%

（kL／t）(Target achieved)

0%


（Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Recovering waste heat in the process of copper smelting and (2)improving power intensity of electric furnaces of ferronickel. Thosemeasures are anticipated to contribute to the reduction of energyconsumption by 20,000 kiloliters in crude oil terms.

Miscellaneousmanufacturing 75 74 99% FY 1990 CO2 emissions

0.4% 3.0% （10,000 t-CO2）(Target achieved)

-3.9%

FY 1990 Energy intensity

（ＫＬ／1,000 t）(Target achieved)

-7.5%[Optic fiber cable]

Miscellaneousmanufacturing 183 63 34% FY 1990 Energy intensity

0.2% 3.0% （kL／1,000 kmc）(Target achieved)

-1%

[Metal wire]

FY 1990 Energy consumption

（1,000 ｋＬ）(Target achieved)

-7%

0.1% Miscellaneousmanufacturing 83 47 57% FY 1997 CO2 emissions

1.0%（10,000 t-CO2）


+9.2%

Miscellaneousmanufacturing 61 38 62% FY 1997 CO2 emission

intensity0.2% 1.0%

（t-CO2／hundred million yen）(Target yet to be

achieved)+2.4%

Miscellaneousmanufacturing 80 68 85% FY 1990 Energy consumption


-13.9%



-12.7%Miscellaneousmanufacturing

0.1% 1.0% 36 29 81% FY 1990 CO2 emissions


-10%

1,035（▲35%）

2.08（▲75%）

2,226（▲40%）

0.7947（▲10%）

61.2

21.5

460（▲20%）

53.7（▲12.2%）

186.5（±0%）

729.6（±0%）

Mis

cella

neou

s man

ufac

turi

ngN

on-f

erro

us m

etal

s and

pro

duct

s

・Reducing 60,000 tons of CO2 (equivalent to 9.8% ofthe emissions in the base year) through energy-savingmeasures such as (1) improvement of power-drivenmachies such as compressors, (2) renewal oftransformers and (3) introduction of high-efficiencyequipment. (This corresponds to 103% of the amountstill to be reduced in order to achieve targets.)

1,010（▲37%）

1,755（▲52.7%）

813（▲48.9%）

1%(1.3%)

▲12.1%(▲23.0%)

0%(0%)

5% ▲5%(▲16.7%)

0.6%

20. Japan Society ofIndustrial Machinery

Manufacturers△

◎Ａ

22. Japan TextileFinishers'

Association

23. Japan SanitaryEquipment Industry

Association

△

○

☆Ａ

21. Japan BearingIndustrial

Association

38.2（▲20%）

33.4（▲30%）

1,592

142.3（▲13%）

172.7

19. Japanese ElectricWire & Cable

Makers’ Association

16. Japan Copperand Brass

Association

18. Japan RubberManufacturers

Association

15. Japan AluminiumAssociation

17. Japan MiningIndustry Association

☆Ｓ

575

△

186.5

8.32

0.442

（KL／ｔ）



0.45%(5.2%）

2.1%(54%)

8% 0.5%(6.7%)

1%

(Reason)・It is estimated that the production of aluminum sheets for auto bodieswill increase significantly due to the trend of weight reduction. (Sheetsconstitute about 75% of the production increment up to 2010.)・Since the production of the sheets for auto bodies requires high-temperature treatment, its energy intensity tends to be 35% worse(higher) than that for regular production. As a result, energy intensity isexpected to reach as high as 19.3 GJ/t by 2010 (up 2.7% from 2006).・In response to this estimated, industrial efforts have been made,achieving an improvement (reduction) from 25.0 to 24.7 GJ/t for autobody sheets and from 18.8 to 18.7 GJ/t for other products. However,due to the increase of the ratio of auto body sheets to the entireproduction, energy intensity in the industry as a whole has registered19.2 GJ/t (up 2.1 from 2006).・The use of aluminium sheets for auto body is contributing to thereduction of CO2 emissions generated during travel, with thiscontribution being about six times greater than the emissions generated （Measures planned for future implementation)


（Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Introducing cogeneration facilities, and (2)promoting the use of alternative fuels. Those measuresare anticipated to contribute to the CO2 reduction byabout 34,000 tons.

6%

0.45%

・Raised targets (beyond previous performance)(Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Introducing or renewing energy-saving facilities andmachines, (2) introducing energy-saving features to indirectsections as represented by the use of high-efficiency lightingequipment and (3) improving efficiency through operationalcontrols. Those measures are anticipated to contribute to thereduction of energy consumption by 1,262 kiloliters per year incrude oil terms or 2,274 t-CO2 per year.


（Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Promoting the use of gas instead of heavy oil, (2) introducingdispersed boilers, (3) introducing energy-saving dyeing machinesand (4) introducing cogeneration facilities. Those measures areanticipated to contribute to the reduction of energy consuption byabout 6.674 kiloliters in crude oil terms.

2%

1.6%

7%


(Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Promoting the use of gas instead of kerosene, and (2) improvingefficiency of facilities such as lighting equipment and air conditioners.These measures are anticipated to contribute to the CO2 reduction by6.700 tons per year.


(Reason)This industry failed to achieve its targets in the previous year butachieved its targets for the current year (surpassing the target by 5.5%)・During FY 2006, energy intensity reached as low as ▲15.5% throughthe revision of the caloric value table of fuel and the reduced productionof ferronickel (temporary decrease due to the implementaion of large-scale remodeling of facilities) in addition to other energy-saving efforts.・It is estimated that production of ferronickel will return to the previouslevel and that energy consumption as well as intensity level will increasedue to the degradation of the grade of ore. It is unknown whether therevision to the caloric value table will continue to be effective beyond2010.・Therefore, the Japan Mining Industry Association plans to raise itsreduction target by 2% to 12% and continue to make efforts towards thereduction of energy intensity.


(Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Promoting an efficient use of heat, (2) introducinghigh-efficiency facilities and (3) promoting the efficientoperation of electric facilities. Those measures areanticipated to contribute to the CO2 reduction by about6,000 tons.

・Reducing 75,000 tons of CO2 through energy-savingmeasures such as (1) introduction of inverter system tomanufacturing equipment, (2) improvement of insulationfunctions of heat treatment furnaces, (3) introduction ofinverter controls to air conditioners and (4) use of alternativefuels.・In addition, reducing 3,000 tons of CO2 annually throughthe improvement of utilization rate and maintenance ofmachines.・Goal is to reduce about 80,000 tons of CO2 by 2010, andreduce CO2 intensity by 33.6% from 1997.

0.404（▲8.6%）

19.4（▲10%）

59.5（▲3%） -

・Will not use credit.

・It is estimated that theplanned introduction ofenergy-saving measureswill bring about resultssurpassing the targets.


☆Ａ

,




0.746（▲15.5%）

18.8（▲13%）

674.6(▲7.5%)

179.2(▲3.9%)

1.94（▲77%）

35.9（▲25%）

0.402（▲9.05%）

0.777(▲12.0%)

175.3(▲6%)

-

671.2(▲8%)

0.404（▲8.6%）

417（▲27%）

(Target achieved)-5.5%

418（▲27%）

19.2（▲11%）

1.96（▲76%）


185,000 t-CO2

2,000 ｔ-CO2(7,000 tonsattributable tothe raised targetin the previousyear)

66,000 t-CO2(312,000 tonsattributable tothe raised targetin the previousyear)

729.6

0.883

☆Ａ

○

47.8

3,710 2,202（▲41%）

154.3（▲10.6%）

☆Ｓ

☆Ｓ

☆Ｓ

☆Ａ

0.4% 18.0%

☆Ａ ◎Ａ(Target achieved)

-3%（ＧＪ／t）

▲2%（▲15.4%)

18,000 t-CO2●Target of intensity only

1.1% 51.0%

☆Ａ ○ 2% ▲3.5% 116,000 t-CO2


24,000 t-CO2 Target determined（CO2 emissions）

58,000 t-CO2(263,000 tonsattributable tothe raised targetin the previousyear)

▲12.3%(▲25.1%)

39







energyconversion or

business/



achievementplan



FY 2006performance




85 16 19% FY 1990 Energy intensity

0.1%

18.7（Ｌ／ｔ）(Target achieved)

-0.1%

53 13 25% FY 1990 CO2 emissionintensity

0.04%

（kg-CO2／GJ）(Target yet to be

achieved)+8.7%

168 121 72% FY 1990 CO2 emissionintensity

49.1% ※Thermal powerof in-housegeneration

（kg-CO2／kWh）(Target yet to be

achieved)+18.3%

31 31 100% FY 1990 Energy intensity

（Measures planned for future implementation)・(1) Enhancing operation control through the use of controltechnologies, etc. (2) increasing waste heat recovery systems and (3)improving efficiency through appropriate maintenance and managementof facilities. These measures are anticipated to contribute to thereduction of energy consumption by a maximum 390,000 kiloliters peryear in crude oil terms.


0.6% 234 24 10% （g-CO2／m3）




-25%

0.2% 48 33 69% FY 2001 CO2 emissionintensity

※Including powerplants of affiliated

companies

（kg-CO2／kWh） (Target newly set)

Non

-man

ufac

turi

ng

Min

ing

/ Con

stru

ctio

n

Ene

rgy

conv

ersi

on se

ctor

0.52（▲3%）

-

1.02（▲10.4%）

23（▲73%）

11（▲87%）

9.17（▲10%）

8.62（▲15%）

1.73（▲11.3%）

1.55（▲20%）

0.410（▲1.7%）

1.02（▲10.3%）

・Will not use credit.

・It is estimated that theplanned introduction ofenergy-saving measureswill bring about resultssurpassing the targets.

・About 120 milliontons-CO2 during 2008and 2012

◎Ｂ

○

－

3. Japan GasAssociation ◎Ｓ☆Ａ

8.87（▲13%）


(Reason)・This industry failed to achieve its targets in the previous year butachieved the targets in the current year (surpassing the target by 0.1%)・The industry's energy consumption comes from the use of light oil asfuel for heavy machines used to mine limestone and the use of electricityas a power source for limestone crushing, sorting or transportingmachines. The reduction in energy intensity this year can be attributed tothe improved energy intensity of light oil due to the recovery ofproduction. However, energy intensity of light oil is rather poor whencompared to the target value. Since the establishment of targets in 1990,limestone production has been in a downward trend, and there arevarious negative elements such as decreasing operating rates as well asunstable forms and grades of ore and climate change.

△

approx. 0.34（▲approx.

20%）・According to the FY2007 power supply plan, it isestimated that average electricity sales for the 2008-2012period will be 921 billion kWh and that CO2 intensity willbe 0.37kg-CO2/kWh. This is 0.03 kg-CO2/kwh short of thetarget value of 0.34 kg-CO2/km. Based on this estimate, theindustry is planning to introduce the following additionalmeasures to make up for said shortage.(1) Promoting nuclear power generation (aiming for a 2 to3% increase)(2) Improving the thermal efficiency of thermal powergeneration (aiming for a 1% increase at maximum)(3) Acquiring 120 million tons of the Kyoto mechanismcredits (aiming for a 5 to 6% increase)

・Planning to achieve targets through energy-saving measures such as (1) installation ofboilers using waste heat (contributing to thereduction of 7,000 tons of GHGs), (2)rationalization of decrepit facilities and (3)introduction of energy-saving facilities.



-

13%

13%

・Has raised targets (within range of previous performance)(Reason)・The volume of petoleum used for production activities is estimated todecrease by 3% by 2010 (from 1952 to 1894 million kiloliters)(according to the estimates of the demand for petroleum products for2010 calculated by the Petroleum Subcommittee of the AdvisoryCommitte for Natural Resources and Energy)・It is estimated that the energy intensity could be improved by about 2%(equivalent to 390,000 kiloliters per year) at the maximum when takinginto consideration said future prospects as well as potentialimprovements achievable from the introduction of energy-savingmeasures such as the increased installation of heat recovery systems andsteam reduction.・When a significant decrease in demand is taken into consideration,energy intensity could increase by 2.9% from 2006 to the target year.・A significant improvement in the quality of gasoline through theincrease of octane rating would constitute deterioration. However, theeffects thereof cannot be quantified due to undetermined contents, andthus are not reflected in these estimates. 　▲10%→▲13%


（Measrues planned for future implementation）・(1) Promoting the use of alternative raw materials such as naturalgas, (2) promoting the use of cold LNG energy, (3) increasingefficiency of facilities and equipment, and (4) promoting thereduction of heat waste from boilers, etc. These measures areanticipated to make it possible to achieve targets.

3%

73（▲46%）

38（▲71%）

0.49（▲10%）－

190,000 t-CO2




12（▲86%）

54（▲59%）

▲1%(▲1.1%）

【New plan】・Since it has only been a few years since the launch of its operations,this group is still in a transitional period and has yet to establish a clearperspective on CO2 emission intensity targets. Its target will probably bedetermined upon the structuring of its power source portfolio as itsbusiness grows.・As part of efforts to reduce CO2 emission intensity, the use of newenergies at incineration plants has been promoted, although it is expectedthat such use of new energy cannot be expanded infinitely and will reachits limits as business grows.・From this standpoint, it can be considered that the present targetrepresents the maximum level possible. It is anticipated that the targetcan be achieved through the introduction of state-of-the-art, high-efficienty thermal power applying limited environmental loads inaddition to aforementioned use of new energy.

▲12%（▲17%）

0.54

133

10.19

24. LimestoneAssociation of Japan

25. Japan PetroleumDevelopmentAssociation

.1. Federation ofElectric PowerCompanies of

Japan

◎Ｃ

2. PetroleumAssociation of

Japan

52.7%

◎C

4. Power Producerand Supplier

84

0.417

1.94

1.14

-

☆C

◎Ｓ

△

△

（kL／1,000 kL）(Target achieved)

-5%

Will use credit in the casewhere target achievmentbecomes difficult

▲2%(▲13.3%)

1.393 milliont-CO2


40







energyconversion or

business/



achievementplan



FY 2006performance




Business/commercialsector

0.03% 41 3 7% FY 1990 Energy intensity

（KL／1,000 ｔ）(Target yet to be

achieved)+2%


0.04% 113 5 4% FY 1998 CO2 emissions

（10,000 t-CO2）


+14%Business/commercia

sector


（kWh／m2･h）




（kWh／m2･h）




（kWh／m2･h）




（kWh／m2･h）




（kWh／m2･h）


Business/commerciasector


（kWh／m2） (Target newly set)



（kWh／m2） (Target newly set)

Business/commerciasector


（MJ／m2） (Target newly set)

3,484（▲4%）

3%62,000 t-CO2※Including theeffects of the existingmeasures of thepresent targetachievement plan

14.96（▲3%）

【New plan】・Planning to achieve targets through energy-savingmeasrues such as (1) reduction of illumination times forsignboard lighting, (2) introduction of temperature controlfor air conditioners with higher temperature settings duringsummer and (3) introduction of centralized control ofdemonstration television sets at retail stores.

・Some companies have theintension of using creditalthough there is noindustry-wide plan forcredit acquisition.

●Intensity target only10. Meeting of LargeHousehold Appliance

Retailers－

9. Japan InformationTechnology ServicesIndustry Association

－

8. Japan LeasingAssociation

548.8（▲1%）

【New plan】Aiming to reduce electricity consumption by 3% fromFY 2002 in terms of intensity, through strict control oftemperatures of air conditioners and the introduction ofenergy-saving office automation systems.

【New plan】・In office spaces, intensive energy-saving measureswill be introduced, including temperature control forair conditioners and efforts to reduce waste power fromlighting equipment, personal computers, etc.・In the data center, a focus will be placed onequipment and machines for information systems, withefforts made to pursuade users to replace old serverswith energy-saving models so as to reduce energyconsumption.


－

・Reducing about 8,000 tons of CO2 through energy-saving measures such as (1) introduction of energy-saving facilities and equipment and (2) implementationof energy-saving activities and improvement ofemission factor of electricity to be purchased. Theindustry is confident that it will achieve this target.



3.7(▲36%)

◎Ｂ

6. Japan DIYIndustry Association ◎Ｓ

◎Ｃ

☆Ｃ

52,000 t-CO2※Including theeffects of the existingmeasures of thepresent targetachievement plan

15% ▲11.2%(▲42.7%)

・Has raised targets (within range of previous performance)

(Reason)・It has been only three years since the establishment of the plan,and the performance of the industry as a whole has beenfluctuating due to the present low coverage within the Associationand change in member companies (12 companies or 21.4%).・Due to the planned revision of the Pharmaceutical Affairs Act (FY2009), it is expected that electricity consumption will increasealong with the business style transformation and longer businesshours.

(Measures planned for future implementation)・Implementing energy-saving activities such as the controls of airconditioners, temperature and lighting equipment.



(Reason)・Potential is unpredictable as it is only three years since theestablishment of the plan. Also, there are uncertain elements such aschanges in member companies (nine new members have jointed while12 members withdrew last year) and a large performance disparityamong members.


・Aiming to reduce energy intensity by 7%through energy-saving measures such as (1)efforts to reduce electricity consumption atrespective bases and (2) intensive operation ofbases.






0.118

☆Ｃ

0.144

4. Japan FranchiseAssociation

3. Japan ChainStores Association

0.161

☆Ｃ

5. Japan DepartmentStores Association

2.072（▲7%）

2.117（▲5%）

4.3（▲26%）

0.135（▲6%）

-

-

-

3.5（▲40%）


(Reason)・Introduction of energy-saving facilities has been already promoted at ahigh rate. It is expected that ATMs, ticket vending machines, cookingappliances at restaurants will be increased to expand services, and assuch the potential of intensity improvement is unpredictable.


(Reason)・Upward revision of the target was recently made during FY2006,aiming for a 2% improvement from 1996. Plans for further targetrevisions will be deliberated upon a review of near-future performance.


(Reason)Probability of achievement of emission intensity target is stillunpredictable due to industry-specific circumstances, as customerdemand for luxurious shopping spaces is quite high, the impact ofclimate change and future store remodeling plans cannot be ignord andthat installation of elevators should be increased to satisfy barrier-freerequirments. However, this industry has the intention of making furtherefforts to achieve higher targets.

（Measures planned for future implementation)・Promoting the introduction of the ESCO project・Introducing energy-saving equipment at new or renewed stores

▲4%(▲40%)

0.140（▲3%）

0.130（▲10%）

0.116（▲2%）

0.1288（▲20%）

0.125（▲22.4%）

0.113（▲4%）

3,629- -

15.11（▲2%） -

554.3- -

-0.04842（▲4.8%）

0.1032（±0%）

0.0762（▲26.2%）

0.0877（▲15%）

0.05086（±0%）

Bus

ines

s/co

mm

erci

al se

ctor

3,629

0.1032

5.8

15.43

554.3

2.230

0.05086

7. Japan Associationof Chain Drug Stores

1. Japan LP GasAssociation －

2. Japan ForeignTrade Council －

☆Ｃ

△

○

◎Ｃ

○ or △

◎Ｓ

☆Ｃ

○ or △

○ or △

41

42

IV. Development of strengthening Voluntary Action Plan and Expansion of Target Areas: Progress in Industries under the Jurisdiction of Ministries and Agencies

In the final report of the previous fiscal year’s Follow-Up to the Voluntary Action Plan (issued on March 26, 2007), all relevant ministries and agencies were called upon to put forth specific and aggressive efforts in regards to the strengthening voluntary action plans and expansion of target areas in business/commercial, transport and other sectors, whose emissions have been increasing sharply ((1)the formulation of voluntary action plans by industries without plans, the promotion of the quantification of qualitative targets, (3) the strict implementation of government follow-up surveys, and (4) the promotion of target-raising), as future challenges.

In inspecting the progress of voluntary action plans, the meetings of senior officials of the

Global Warming Prevention Headquarters held in March 2007 and of the Global Warming Prevention Headquarters held in May the same year also cited the necessity of strengthening measures pertaining to the strengthening voluntary action plans and expansion of target areas such as formulation by industries without plans, primarily consisting of service sector industries, and the promotion of target raising, while at the said meeting of senior officials in July the same year, the Chief Cabinet Secretary instructed each ministry and agency to strengthen efforts based on reports on the progress of actions at the ministerial and agency level.

Also in the “Economic and Fiscal Policy 2007 (Basic Policies 2007)” (adopted by the Cabinet on June 19, 2007), these issues were characterized as being among key pillars of specific measures toward achieving targets of the Kyoto Protocol.

Furthermore, the Joint Conference of the Industrial Structure Council and the Central Environmental Council that is conducting evaluations and reviews of the Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement Plan summarized points of arguments on the issues and other matters in April of this year, and conducted hearings with the Director-Generals, the Deputy Director-Generals, etc. of the relevant ministries and agencies in June for the purpose of deliberating on the progress in industries under the jurisdiction of the ministries and agencies in question. Based on these deliberations, the “interim report” of the Joint Conference (issued on September 26, 2007) pointed out that the ministries and agencies involved should strengthen their encouragement of industries under their jurisdiction and implement specific efforts “by the end of October of this year at the latest.”

Following this, the necessity of specifying methods for handling the issues was also

43

confirmed in October of this year in the “Basic Policy toward the Review of the Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement Plan” (adopted by the Global Warming Prevention Headquarters on October 2, 2007).

Based on this background, the Follow-Up to the voluntary action plans by 39 industries under the jurisdiction of the Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry was conducted on the 11th and 17th of October, and, regarding the strengthening voluntary action plans by 35 industries under the jurisdiction of the ministries and agencies other than the METI, as well as expansion of target areas, hearings and deliberations by the ministries and agencies and major industries involved, were implemented on October 23 at the Joint Conference of the Industrial Structure Council and the Central Environmental Council.

*Outline of status of progress reported is as follows. See “Reference” for details. <Strengthening Voluntary Action Plan and Expansion of Target Areas Progress in Industries under the Jurisdiction of Each Ministry and Agency> *As for the newspaper publishers’ association and the federation of private schools, etc., which were reportedly scheduled to

execute their measures within October, revisions based on subsequent progress have been made.

JYA◎ JFHO◎JWA◎ NBA◎ JFTA◎JBIA◎ JHTA△MLIT

JSRA◎ JCFIA◎JFA×MAFF

PI△ Co-op△JMA×MHLW

NFPS×MEXT

BAJ× JT×MOF

NACBJ× ＮＨＫ× JSBA×TSA×JCTA×TCA△

MIC

JBA× LIAJ×GIAJ×

LISJ◎ GIAJ◎NASB× CBSK×JSDA×FSA

Zennichiyuren×ANAMOU△NPA

NSK◎ ZPK◎NFIWMA△MOE

18 industries(JCIA◎PAJ◎JCA◎ etc.

JLPGA◎JFTC◎

ITSIA◎ JLA◎MLHAR◎PPS◎LALEH×

(Ref.)METI

Setting of higher targetsThorough follow-ups by the government

Qualitative targets in quantitative terms

Formulation of plans within industries in which no plans have

yet to be formulated

JYA◎ JFHO◎JWA◎ NBA◎ JFTA◎JBIA◎ JHTA△MLIT

JSRA◎ JCFIA◎JFA×MAFF

PI△ Co-op△JMA×MHLW

NFPS×MEXT

BAJ× JT×MOF

NACBJ× ＮＨＫ× JSBA×TSA×JCTA×TCA△

MIC

JBA× LIAJ×GIAJ×

LISJ◎ GIAJ◎NASB× CBSK×JSDA×FSA

Zennichiyuren×ANAMOU△NPA

NSK◎ ZPK◎NFIWMA△MOE

18 industries(JCIA◎PAJ◎JCA◎ etc.

JLPGA◎JFTC◎

ITSIA◎ JLA◎MLHAR◎PPS◎LALEH×

(Ref.)METI

Setting of higher targetsThorough follow-ups by the government

Qualitative targets in quantitative terms

Formulation of plans within industries in which no plans have

yet to be formulated

◎： Industries which have already launched voluntary action plans (by way of establishment of new plans or the setting of higher targets, etc.)

△：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans during the current year×：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans next year or in another year not yet

determined or which do not plan to implement any such plans

Notes


△：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans during the current year×：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans next year or in another year not yet

determined or which do not plan to implement any such plans

Notes（Note) It is necessary that the joint meetings conduct detailed

examinations on reduction effect by the formulation of voluntaryaction plans and setting of higher targets.

As a result of the above deliberations, some industries have already executed their specific

measures as seen in the fact that four out of a total of 35 industries raised their targets, while it was revealed that 17 industries are not scheduled to execute measures within the current year.

1.

2.

3.

4.

・The association is discussing its goal of maintaining GHGemissions in FY 2010 at the FY 2000 level and also plans toformulate a voluntary action plan during the current year.

Zenkoku Pet Kourigyou Kyoukai(National Pet Animal Retailer Association): ◎

・On October 19, 2007, the association formulated avoluntary action plan to reduce CO2 emissions by 6%compared to FY 2006 by FY 2010.Power Producer and Supplier: ◎

All Nippon Amusement Machine Operators' Union:△

・The organization made a voluntary action plan (proposal)and plans to finalize it during the current year.

Formulation ofplans withinindustries inwhich plans haveyet to beformulated

・On October 26, 2007, the association formulated avoluntary action plan to reduce CO2 emissions by 5%compared with FY 2005 by FY 2010.

・The association formulated a voluntary action plan on July 24, 2007.

・A voluntary action plan was formulated on July 31, 2007.

National Federation of Industrial Waste ManagementAssociations: △

Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association: ◎

Japan Leasing Association: ◎

Qualitative targetsin quantitativeterms

Thoroughfollow-ups by thegovernment

Japan LP Gas Association: ◎

Japan Foreign Trade Council: ◎

Japan Newspaper Publishers & EditorsAssociation(Nihon Shinbun Kyoukai): ◎

・On September 20, 2007, the federation formulated avolutary action plan to reduce CO2 emissions by 9%compared with FY 2007 by FY 2010, and by 15% by FY2012. However, the actual level of CO2 emissions in themost recent year has not been provided.

Zennichiyuren (Federation of Japanese GameMachine Industry Associations)：×

Financial Services Agency Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications

・The association formulated a volutary action plan on July 26, 2007and will set a quantitative target in the near future.

National Association of Shinkin Banks: ×

Community Bank Shinyo Kumiai：×

Japan Securities Dealers Association: ×

・The organization formulated a volutary action plan on October 26,2007 and will set a quantitative target in the near future.

△：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans during the current year

Ministry of Economy, Trade and IndustryN

otes


Ministry of the Environment

Strengthening Voluntary Action Plan and Expansion of Target Areas Progress in Industriesunder the Jurisdiction of Each Ministry and Agency

（Note) The joint meetings should be held to conduct detailed examinationon the formulation of voluntary action plans and on reduction efforts suchas the setting of higher targets.

×：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans next year or in another year not yet determined or which do not plan to implement any such plans

National Police Agency

・Mesaures to be taken are being discussed.・On September 18, 2007, the association decided to formulate avoluntary action plan during the current year.

・The association set a higher target this year. (Specifically, the 10% reduction of energyconsumption intensity compared with FY 1990 was changed to 13%.)

Liaison Association for Large Exihibition Halls: ×

Japan Chemical Industry Association: ◎

・The association formulated a voluntary action plan on September 27, 2007.

Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers: ◎

・A voluntary action plan was formulated on September 14, 2007.

・The association set a higher target this year. (Specifically, the approximately 3% reductionof energy consumption intensity compared with FY 1990 was changed to 3.8%.)

※In addition to the above, the following 18 industries set higher targets this year:Japan Paper Association, Japan Gas Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, fourelectrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Copperand Brass Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers' Association, Japan RubberManufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Lime Manufacture Association, FlatGlass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Textile Finishers' Association, Japan SanitaryEquipment Industry Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan Association of ChainDrug Stores

・The association set a higher target this year. (Specifically, the 10% reduction of energyconsumption intensity compared with FY 1990 was changed to 20%.)

Setting of highertargets

Japan Cement Association: ◎

General Insurance Association of Japan: ◎・On April 19, 2007, the association set a performance target aimedat reducing electric power consumption in FY 2010 by 18%compared with FY 2000.

・The association plans to set its uniform performance target in November.・Currently, respective business operators have formulated their own voluntary environmentalaction plans. (Number of business operators who have set their performance targets: 25 (outof a total of 55 operators))

Petroleum Association of Japan: ◎

Japanese Bankers Association: ×

・Follow-ups are scheduled for implementation during the currentyear at meetings such as the FSA council meetings.

General Insurance Association of Japan: ×

Life Insurance Association of Japan: ×・Follow-ups are scheduled for implementation during the currentyear at meetings such as the FSA council meetings.

・Follow-ups are scheduled for implementation during the currentyear at meetings such as the FSA council meetings.

Japan Broadcasting Corporation: ×・The organization plans to set a performance target during the current year.

Telecommunications Carriers Association △

Japan Satellite Broadcasting Association: ×

Life Insurance Association of Japan: ◎

National Association of Commercial Broadcasters in Japan: ×

・On September 5, 2007, the association set a performance targetaimed at reducing its average electric power consumption by 2%compared with FY 2006 between FY 2008 and FY 2012 (on anestimate basis, approximately 17% reduction compared with FY2000) and to ensure that electric power consumption per floor areadoes not exceed the FY 2006 level.

・The association plans to set its uniform performance target during the current year.・Currently, respective business operators have formulated their own voluntary environmentalaction plans. (Number of business operators who have set their performance targets: five (outof a total of 367 operators))

・The association plans to set its uniform performance target during the current year.・Currently, respective business operators have formulated their own voluntary environmentalaction plans. (Number of business operators who have set their performance targets: 23 (outof a total of 200 operators))

・The association plans to set its uniform performance target during the current year.・Currently, respective business operators have formulated their own voluntary environmentalaction plans. (Number of business operators who have set their performance targets: three(out of a total of 108 operators))

・The association plans to set its uniform performance target during the current year.・Currently, respective business operators have formulated their own voluntary environmentalaction plans. (Number of business operators who have set their performance targets: 29 (outof a total of 290 operators))

Telecom Service Association: ×

Japan Cable and Telecommunications Association: ×

・A follow-up was conducted at the Joint Council meeting between the Japan Foreign TradeCouncil and the Central Environment Council on October 17, 2007.

・A follow-up was conducted at the Joint Council meeting between the association and theCentral Environment Council on October 11, 2007.

For reference

44

△：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans during the current year

Not

es

◎： Industries which have already launched voluntary action plans (by way of establishment of new plans or the setting of higher targets, etc.) Strengthening Voluntary Action Plan and Expansion of Target Areas Progress in Industries

under the Jurisdiction of Each Ministry and Agency（Note) The joint meetings should be held to conduct detailed examinationon the formulation of voluntary action plans and on reduction efforts suchas the setting of higher targets.

×：Industries which plan to implement voluntary action plans next year or in another year not yet determined or which do not plan to implement any such plans

For reference

1.

2.

3.

4.

Quantificationof qualitativegoals

Thoroughfollow-us by thegovernment

Setting ofhigher targets

Tobacco manufacturers (Japan Tobacco): ×・A follow-up will be conducted at the next meeting of the Cigarette BusinessSubcommittee of the Fiscal System Council, scheduled to be held in March 2008.

・The association set a higher target in August 2007. (The 4% reduction of CO2emission intensity in FY 2010 compared with the average estimated level between FY1996 and FY 2010 was changed to a 30% reduction on average between FY 2008 andFY 2012 compared with FY 1996.)

Japan Trucking Association: ◎

・In September 2007, the union decided to conduct afollow-up at the meeting of the new committee of theMinistry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and is nowpreparing for the establishment of said committee. Theunion plans to hold a committee meeting during thecurrent year.

・In September 2007, the industry decided to conduct afollow-up at the meeting of the new committee of theMinistry of Health, Labour and Welfare, and is nowpreparing for the establishment of said committee. Theindustry plans to hold a committee meeting during thecurrent year.

・In light of results of examination at the Committee forFormulation of Voluntary Action Plans Aimed atCombatting Global Warming on the Part of PrivateMedical Institutions, the association plans to formulatea voluntary action plan during the current year followingthe investigation of actual conditions and theimplementation of analysis thereof.

Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science andTechnology

Brewers Association of Japan: ×

Formulation ofplans in industriesin which no planshave yet to beformulated

・The federation set a higher target in September 2007 (The target level of reduction inCO2 emissions in construction work in FY 2010 compared with FY 1990 was changedfrom 7% to 20%.)

Japan Federation of Housing Organizations: ◎

・The association set a new target in August 2007 (to reduce CO2 emission intensity inFY2010 by 10% compared with FY 1997).

・The association plans to set a new target (i.e. the level of CO2 emission intensity percargo unit) during the current year.

・The federation set a new target in August 2007 (to reduce CO2 emission intensity by atleast 6% compared with FY 1990).

Japan Federation of Taxicab Associations: ◎

Japan Harbor Transportation Association: △

・The association set a new target in August 2007 (to reduce energy consumptionintensity in FY 2010 by 18% compared with FY 2002).

Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport

Japanese Consumers' Co-operative Union: △

Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries

Japan Warehousing Association: ◎・The association set a new target in September 2007 (to reduce energy consumptionintensity in FY 2010 by 8% compared with FY 1990).

Nihon Bus Association: ◎

Japan Boating Industry Association: ◎

・A follow-up will be conducted at the next meeting of the National Tax Countil,scheduled to be held in February 2008.

Pharmaceutical industry (Federation ofPharmaceutical Manufacturers' Associations ofJAPAN / Japan Pharmaceutical ManufacturersAssociation): ：△

Japan Sugar Refiners' Association: ◎

・The association set a higher target in October 2007. (Thetarget level of reduction in average CO2 emission intensitybetween FY 2008 and FY 2012 compared with FY 1990 waschanged from 6% to 24%.)

Japan Convenience Foods Industry Association: ◎

・The association set a higher target in September 2007. (The20% reduction of CO2 emissions in FY 2010 compared with FY1990 was changed to a 22% reduction on average between FY2008 and FY 2012 compared with FY 1990. )

・On October 31, 2007, the federation formulated avoluntary action plan to reduce CO2 emissions by 1% ona year-on-year basis, citing FY 2007 as the benchmarkyear.

National Federation of Private Schools：×

・The association will set a quantitative target as soon aspossible during the current year.

Japan Food Service Association: ×

Ministry of Finance Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare

Japan Medical Association: ×

45

46

V. Issues Identified for the Future

Based on the contents of the deliberations concerning the Fiscal 2006 Follow-Up to the

Voluntary Action Plan, the government and the industrial sector should take appropriate measures in regards to the following issues.

In light of the fact that the Joint Conference of the Industrial Structure Council and the Central Environment Council concerning the review of the Target Achievement Plan is scheduled to finalize their report in December of this year, the government and the relevant industries are required to issue swift responses to the following point number 1 in particular. In a bid to reconfirm the status of progress from now on, the Joint Conference will be held within the current year to conduct further Follow-Ups when need arises. 1. Strengthening voluntary action plans and expansion of target areas

In previous fiscal year, we proposed the strengthening voluntary action plans and the expansion of target areas in business/commercial, transport and other sectors, whose emissions have been increasing sharply ((1) the formulation of voluntary action plans by industries without plans, the promotion of the quantification of qualitative targets, (3) the strict implementation of government follow-up surveys, and (4) the promotion of target-raising), as future challenges.

As for industries covered by the Follow-Up, the majority of industries that have achieved their targets (18 out of 25 industries) raised their targets for the current fiscal year, taking advantage of the merits of voluntary action plans that provide an incentive for independent initiative in raising targets. Also, four industries (information services, leasing services, power producers and suppliers and mass retailers of household appliances) formulated new voluntary action plans while two other industries (the liquefied petroleum gas industry and trading firms) joined the Follow-Up as new participants. However, of 18 industries that raised targets, seven industries have raised their targets to levels above their performance while 11 industries raised targets to levels below their performance levels. Seven target-achieving industries failed to raise their targets.

Regarding target-raising, industries whose current performance exceeds the level of the quantitative targets should set targets higher than their current performance. In particular, industries that set targets in terms of energy consumption intensity (11 industries: six out of seven industries that have failed to raise targets and five out of 11 industries that have raised targets to levels below their performance) are called upon to raise their targets to levels above their current performance level while paying attention to the targets under the Law concerning the Rational Use of Energy (Energy Saving Law) regarding long- and medium-term improvement of energy consumption intensity at factories and business offices by over 1% on average on a yearly basis.

47

Regarding efforts by the government as a whole, the Joint Conference of the Industrial

Structure Council and the Central Environmental Council issued their “interim report” (on September 26, 2007) and the Global Warming Prevention Headquarters adopted its “Basic Policy toward the Review of the Kyoto Protocol Target Achievement Plan” (on October 2, 2007). Twenty four industries out of those that were identified in the above report and policy have yet to execute specific measures (six of them are scheduled to execute such measures within this year). In order to ensure that the 24 industries execute specific measures, including the formulation of voluntary action plans, at an early date (within the current year at the latest) prior to the revision of the Target Achievement Plan, the relevant ministries and agencies should further encourage said industries under their jurisdiction in specific terms and in a proactive manner.

2. Enhancement of Target-Missing Industries’ Likelihood of Achieving Targets

Industries that have yet to achieve their current target levels should, to the greatest extent possible, present data and anticipated effects pertaining to future measures (including the utilization of the Kyoto Mechanism Credits) in order to compensate for their non-achievement range in quantitative and specific terms.

In order for these industries to enhance their likelihood of achieving voluntary action plan targets, they should identify contents and effects of measures scheduled for future implementation in a more quantitative and specific manner, and steadily implement the said measures. As for industries utilizing Kyoto Mechanism Credits in cases wherein the achievement of the targets in question proves difficult, they should, to the greatest extent possible, present their prospects of the amount of credits to be purchased and the timing of said purchases in specific terms. Moreover, should they utilize purchased credits in order to achieve their targets, they should transfer said credits to the government’s accounts free of charge.

In order to further enhance such industries’ likelihood of achieving targets, the industries in question should check the status of the division of roles between corporations composing their industries at the current stage and conduct reviews as required.

3. Target-setting with the inclusion of CO2 emissions

In light of the fact that the Kyoto Protocol’s target is CO2 emissions, industries, including those setting intensity targets, are called upon to make a more forceful effort with increasing focus on the reduction of CO2 emissions.

In light of the fact that certain industries within the iron and steel and automobile sectors are taking actions by way of setting total amounts of energy consumption and CO2

emissions as performance indicators even in the context where their future production output is affected by economic trends, industries that have only set intensity targets should

48

actively consider also incorporating CO2 emissions into their performance indicators. We hope that Nippon Keidanren will also continue to urge member industries to set targets that include CO2 emissions.

4. Active disclosure of information

As for CO2 emissions, etc., preconditions for the evaluation of industries’ voluntary action plans, industry-by-industry formulation and management is, in principle, being conducted. On the other hand, the mandatory greenhouse gas accounting and reporting system came into force in April 2007 under the Global Warming Law, and in principle, all corporations (business operators) whose emissions are above a certain level are required to make their CO2 emissions public.

Within this context, beginning with this year’s Follow-Up, industries have been requested under the Global Warming Law to contain their CO2 emissions on a per-business establishment basis on a list of corporations (business establishment-by-business establishment) participating in the voluntary actions plans. However, 14 industries have failed to disclose sufficient information. In regards to CO2 emissions by business establishments participating in the voluntary actions plans, all industries should utilize emission data from their own individual business establishments, as required by the Global Warming Law, and proactively promote information disclosure including the quantitative presentation of case examples of advanced efforts.

5. Transmission of information at home and abroad

Efforts made in Japan based on the Voluntary Action Plan should be actively disseminated abroad in order to promote international recognition based on correct understanding.

Specifically, the Government and Nippon Keidanren should promote overseas transmission, including displaying results of this fiscal year’s Follow-Up to voluntary action plans on English language websites within the current year, in addition to displaying the FY 2006 Follow-Up results now under construction online. Industries are also requested to conduct international comparisons based on reliable data and actively promote international dissemination of their efforts based on voluntary action plans.

On the domestic front, industries, particularly those engaged in the development and diffusion of products closely associated with people’s daily lives, should actively promote the dissemination of information in an easy-to-understand way and strive for consumer enlightenment.

6. Strengthening efforts in the business/commercial, household and transport sectors Since emissions from the business/commercial, household and transport sectors have

increased significantly, it is necessary to drastically strengthen measures to reduce

49

emissions in these sectors. It is necessary for all industries to step up their efforts with regard to the measures now being implemented in the business and transport sectors, such as energy-saving in office buildings, including head office buildings, and joint delivery, and through the development and diffusion of energy-saving products on the part of the commercial and transport sectors.

Specifically, Nippon Keidanren requested in June of this year that its member industries and corporations strengthen measures at their office buildings, etc. and expand the use of environmental household account books, and conducted surveys of member firms. Pursuant to such efforts, Nippon Keidanren should set a comprehensive and inter-industrial target within the current year to reduce CO2 emissions by head offices and other buildings belonging to member industries and companies. It should also promote efforts to expand the household use of environmental household account books by employees of member corporations.

As for the efforts by the business/commercial and transport sectors in the industrial sector and the contribution of the business/commercial, household and transport sectors to the reduction of emissions, it is hoped that their effects will, to the greatest extent possible, be presented in quantitative terms. As for the effects on emissions of the development and diffusion of products, it is important to quantify these from the perspective of life cycle assessment through the stages of recycling, manufacturing and use.

50

(Reference) Industries’ Performance Indicators and Factor

Analyses 1. Changes in industries’ performance indicators (graph) (Graph legend) Changes in performance indicator Target value Changes in reference indicator

Indicator established for target Other indicators (reference)

1. Changes in performance indicators for energy-conversion and industrial sectors [Industries setting CO2 emission as performance indicators (12 industries)]

81

159

119 101

176

371

262

220

2.27

3.08

2.83

60

110

160

210

260

310

360

410

FY19

90

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2,10000kl

2

2.5

3

3.5

4

kl/10000m2

CO2 emissions

Energy consumption

Energy intensity

Japan Textile Finishers’ Association

71.4

65.0

56.153.5

18.8

21.4

19.1

138.8

178.0

163.4

135.8

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

180

190

10000t-CO2

Energy consumption

CO2 emissions

Energy intensity

Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan10000kL (crude oil equivalent)or L/box equivalent

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

51

62.7

178.8

43.9

55.4

41.7

107.3

148.9

103.6

258.4

284.3

309.4

30

50

70

90

110

130

150

170

190

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10250

260

270

280

290

300

310

320

l/t (crude oil equivalent)

CO2 emissions

Energy consumption

Energy intensity

Japan Glass Bottle Association10000t-CO2 or10000kl (crude oil equivalent)

38

107

133

47

84

54

11 12

0.006

0.022

0.039

0

20

40

60

80

100

120

140

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2 or

g-CO2/m3

0.004

0.014

0.024

0.034

PJ/PJ

CO2 emissions

Energy intensity

CO2 emission intensity


122

108 107

112

118

112

101

100

354

310312

326

90

95

100

105

110

115

120

125

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

270

280

290

300

310

320

330

340

350

360

10000t-CO2

CO2 emissions

Energy consumption

Energy intensity

Lime Manufacture Association10000kl (crude oil equivalent)or l/t

175

179175

187

730

675

756

671

160

165

170

175

180

185

190

195

200

205

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2

650

670

690

710

730

750

770kl/1000t

CO2 emissions

Energy intensity

Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

52

665698688

715

471

541

427

589

228

320

309

400

450

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10200

250

300

350

CO2 emissions

Energy intensity


Japan Auto Parts Industries Associationt-CO2/billion yenor 10000t-CO2

kl/hundred million yen

48

42

33

36

65

100

89

30

32

34

36

38

40

42

44

46

48

50

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2

60

65

70

75

80

85

90

95

100

105%

Energy intensity

CO2 emissions

Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association

61.2

59.5

53.7

67.1

13.7

13.714.4

50

52

54

56

58

60

62

64

66

68

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

18

Energy intensity

CO2 emissions

Japan Society of IndustrialMachinery Manufacturers kl/hundred million yen

(crude oil equivalent)

749

685

559

655

135

214219

500

550

600

650

700

750

800

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2

0

50

100

150

200

250

trillion yen/1000kl

Energy intensity

CO2 emissions

Japan Automobile ManufacturersAssociation

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

53

83

91

101

82

10.4

16.1

16.4

60

70

80

90

100

110

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2

10

12

14

16

18

10000kl/trillion yen

Energy intensity

CO2 emissions

Japan Auto-Body Industries Association

6.11

6.14

6.55

5.50

0.20 0.22

0.28

5.2

5.4

5.6

5.8

6

6.2

6.4

6.6

6.8

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

10000t-CO2

0.2

0.2

0.3

0.3

0.4

kl/car

CO2 emissions

Energy intensity

Japan Industrial Vehicles Association

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

54

[Industries setting energy consumption targets (three industries)]

2,5272,516

2,394

2,274

100

97

92

2,200

2,250

2,300

2,350

2,400

2,450

2,500

2,550

2,600

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

PJ

90

95

100

105

1990=100

Energy consumption

Energy intensity


16.6

13.614.5 106.8

139.8

131.4

10

12

14

16

18

20

22

24

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

80

90

100

110

120

130

140

150

160

170

l/million yen

Energy consumption

Energy intensity

Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association10000kl(crude oil equivalent)

0.312 0.309

0.334

418

551

575

417

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

400

420

440

460

480

500

520

540

560

580

600

Energy intensity

Energy consumption

Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ AssociationMetal wire (copper, aluminum)

1000kl/1000tons(crude oil equivalent)

1000kl(crude oil equivalent)

8.32

7.05

1.96

1.94

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

kl/1000kmc

Energy intensity

Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ AssociationOptical fiber cable

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

55

[Industries setting energy intensity and CO2 emission intensity targets (one industry)]

0.95

0.84

0.99

0.83

14,321

13,520

11,677

11,457

0.7

0.8

0.9

1.0

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

t-CO2/t

11,000

11,500

12,000

12,500

13,000

13,500

14,000

14,500

15,000

MJ/t

Energy intensity



[Industries setting solely energy intensity targets (eight industries)]

0.839

0.883

0.746

0.777

0.7

0.75

0.8

0.85

0.9

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

KL/t

Energy intensity

Japan Mining Industry Association

9.37

10.19

8.62

8.87

8

9

10

11

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

84.0

Energy intensity

Petroleum Association of Japankl (crude oil equivalent)/10000kl (production amount)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

56

13.9

14.5

10.5

12.5

10.0

11.0

12.0

13.0

14.0

15.0

16.0

17.0

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

1030.0

90.0

Energy intensity

Japan Construction Equipment ManufacturersAssociationkl/hundred million yen

100

82

94

80

75

80

85

90

95

100

105

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

FY1990=100

Energy intensity

Japan Chemical Industry Association

20.5

21.5

18.8

19.2

18

19

20

21

22

FY19

90

FY19

95FY

1996

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

Energy intensity

Japan Aluminium AssociationGJ/t (rolling volume)

0.402

0.442

0.465

0.404

0.38

0.39

0.4

0.41

0.42

0.43

0.44

0.45

0.46

0.47

0.48

FY19

90

FY19

95

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

Energy intensity

Japan Copper and Brass Associationkl/t (crude oil equivalent)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(tbas

e yea

r)

(tbas

e yea

r)

57

1.02

1.14

1.09

1.02

0.9

1

1.1

1.2

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

Energy intensity

Limestone Association of Japanl/t (crude oil equivalent)

3,586

3,478

3,562

3,451

3,400

3,450

3,500

3,550

3,600

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

MJ/t-cement

0

2000

Energy intensity


[Industries setting CO2 emission intensity targets (five industries)]

0.211

0.324

0.253

0.214

0.123

0.161

0.186

0.12

0.17

0.22

0.27

0.32

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

t-CO2/million yen

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.15

0.16

0.17

0.18

0.19

kl/million yen


Energy intensity

4 electric and electronicindustry associations

0.41

0.37

0.42

0.34

0.30

0.35

0.40

0.45

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

kg-CO2/kWh

CO2 consumption intencity

Federation of Electric PowerCompanies of Japan

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

58

0.54

0.49

0.52

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.5

0.6

0.6

0.6

FY19

90

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

kg-CO2/kWh



142.3

154.3

172.7

107.9

88.0

140

150

160

170

180

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

85

90

95

100

105

110

115

Energy intensity


Japan Bearing Industrial Associationt-CO2/hundred million yen

kl/hundred million yen(crude oil equivalent)

1.55

1.94

1.621.73

1.20

1.40

1.60

1.80

2.00

2.20

FY19

90

FY19

97FY

1998

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

kg-CO2/1000GJ


Japan Petroleum Development Association

(bas

e yea

r)

(ba

se y

ear)

(targ

et)

(bas

e yea

r)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

59

2. Changes in performance indicators in the business/commercial sector [Industries setting CO2 emission as performance indicators (one industry)]

4.3

3.5

5.8

40.7

39.8

3

4

5

6

7

8

FY19

90

FY19

98FY

1999

FY20

00FY

2001

FY20

02FY

2003

FY20

04FY

2005

FY20

06

FY20

10

10000t-CO2

35

36

37

38

39

40

41

42

43

l/m2

CO2 emissions

Energy intensity

Japan Foreign Trade Council

[Industries setting solely energy intensity targets (nine industries)]

0.130

0.144

0.135

0.135

0.125

0.13

0.135

0.14

0.145

FY19

90

FY19

98FY

1999

FY20

00FY

2001

FY20

02FY

2003

FY20

04FY

2005

FY20

06

FY20

10

kWh/m2･h

80

240

Energy intensity


0.161

0.149

0.125

0.129

0.12

0.13

0.14

0.15

0.16

0.17

FY19

90

FY19

98FY

1999

FY20

00FY

2001

FY20

02FY

2003

FY20

04FY

2005

FY20

06

FY20

10

kwh／㎡・h

0

3

Energy intensity


(targ

et)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

60

0.113

0.118

0.1150.116

0.1

0.105

0.11

0.115

0.12

0.125

0.13

FY19

90

FY19

96

FY19

99FY

2000

FY20

01FY

2002

FY20

03FY

2004

FY20

05FY

2006

FY20

10

kwh/m2･h

0

1

Energy intensity

Japan Chain Stores Association

0.1032

0.0762

0.0877

0.07

0.09

0.11

FY19

90

FY20

04FY

2005

FY20

06

FY20

10

kwh／㎡・h

0

1

Energy intensity

Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores

0.048

0.051 0.051

0.04

0.042

0.044

0.046

0.048

0.05

0.052

0.054

0.056

FY19

90

FY20

04FY

2005

FY20

06

FY20

10

kwh／㎡・h

35

135

Energy intensity

Japan DIY Industry Association

2.072.12

1.99

2.23

1.5

2.0

2.5

FY19

90

FY20

00FY

2001

FY20

02FY

2003

FY20

04FY

2005

FY20

06

FY20

10

kl/1000t

Energy intensity

Japan LP Gas Association

(targ

et)

(bas

e yea

r)

(targ

et)

(bas

e yea

r)

(targ

et)

(bas

e yea

r)

(targ

et)

61

15.43

15.1114.96

13.5

14.0

14.5

15.0

15.5

16.0

FY19

90

FY20

02FY

2003

FY20

04FY

2005

FY20

06

FY20

10

10000kWh/m2

Energy intensity

Japan Leasing Association

554.3

548.8

540

542

544

546

548

550

552

554

556

558

560

FY19

90

FY20

06

FY20

10

kwh／㎡

35

135

Energy intensity

Japan Information Technology ServicesIndustry Association

3,629

3,484

3,400.0

3,450.0

3,500.0

3,550.0

3,600.0

3,650.0

3,700.0

FY19

90

FY20

06

FY20

10

MJ/m2

Energy intensity

Meeting of Large Household Appliance

(bas

e yea

r)

(bas

e yea

r)

(targ

et)

(bas

e yea

r)

(targ

et)

(targ

et)

62

2. CO2 emissions by industry (performance in FY2006) *1: For the Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan and Power Producer and Supplier, only the portion attributed to the industry (or of the total CO2 emitted

through electricity production, the portion that can be calculated as having been emitted by the users) is calculated into the total. *2: Calculations of CO2 emissions as outlined here have been arrived at based on the fixed CO2 emission coefficient of purchased electricity at the fiscal 1990 level.

The other method calculates CO2 emission in a manner that reflects changes in the CO2 emission coefficient on a yearly basis. *3: The base year for CO2 emissions for the following industries is as follows: the Japan Copper and Brass Association – FY1995, the Japan Aluminium Association

– FY1995, the Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association – FY1997, the Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers – FY1997, Power Producer and Supplier – FY2001, the Japan Bearing Industrial Association – FY1997, the Japan Chain Stores Association – FY1996 (Note that the CO2 emission value is for FY1999), the Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores – FY2004, the Japan DIY Industry Association – FY2004, the Japan Leasing Association – FY2002, the Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association – FY2006, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers – FY2006, and the Japan Foreign Trade Council – FY1998.

*4: Starting FY2006, the Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association began using the value of CO2 emission level for thermal power plants as its method for calculating CO2 emission reduction effect. However, for the purposes of this chart, the average value for of all power plants has been used for the sake of ensuring consistency.

(Emission unit: 10000t-CO2)

Base year FY2005(last fiscal year)

Compared with base yearRate (%) Compared with FY2005 Rate (%)

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan 27,500.0 37,300.0 36,500.0 9000.0 32.7% ▲ 800.0 -2.1%1 (own use)*1 3,070.0 3,850.0 3,700.0 630.0 20.5% ▲ 150.0 -3.9%2 Petroleum Association of Japan 3,094.0 4,136.0 4,062.0 968.0 31.3% ▲ 74.0 -1.8%3 Japan Gas Association 133.0 47.0 38.0 ▲ 95.0 -71.4% ▲ 9.0 -19.1%4 Power Producer and Supplier (own use)*1　*3 1.1 14.5 18.6 17.5 ###### 4.1 28.3%

6,298.1 8,047.5 7,818.6 1520.5 24.1% ▲ 228.9 -2.8%

5 Japan Iron and Steel Federation 20,371.0 19,046.0 19,326.0 ▲ 1045.0 -5.1% 280.0 1.5%6 Japan Chemical Industry Association 6,685.0 7,305.0 7,288.0 603.0 9.0% ▲ 17.0 -0.2%7 Japan Paper Association 2,544.8 2,475.3 2,330.1 ▲ 214.7 -8.4% ▲ 145.2 -5.9%8 Japan Cement Association 2,741.0 2,177.4 2,184.3 ▲ 556.7 -20.3% 6.9 0.3%9 4 electrical/electronics-related groups 1,112.0 1,807.2 1,846.0 734.0 66.0% 38.8 2.1%

10 Japan Auto Parts Industries Association 714.7 715.7 697.8 ▲ 16.9 -2.4% ▲ 17.9 -2.5%11 Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association*2 749.0 576.0 559.0 ▲ 190.0 -25.4% ▲ 17.0 -3.0%12 Japan Mining Industry Association 486.5 497.2 482.5 ▲ 4.0 -0.8% ▲ 14.7 -3.0%13 Lime Manufacture Association 354.0 304.9 311.6 ▲ 42.4 -12.0% 6.7 2.2%14 Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association*4 190.2 225.0 212.2 22.0 11.6% ▲ 12.8 -5.7%15 Japan Aluminium Association*3 161.8 160.6 154.1 ▲ 7.7 -4.8% ▲ 6.5 -4.0%16 Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan 178.0 132.8 135.8 ▲ 42.2 -23.7% 3.0 2.3%17 Japan Auto-Body Industries Association 90.9 99.3 100.8 9.9 10.9% 1.5 1.5%18 Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers' Association 99.6 83.8 81.8 ▲ 17.8 -17.9% ▲ 2.0 -2.4%　　　　　　　　　　　(copper/aluminum wire) 97.6 76.0 72.6 ▲ 25.0 -25.6% ▲ 3.4 -4.5%　　　　　　　　　　　(optic fiber cable) 2.0 7.8 9.2 7.2 361.5% 1.5 18.8%

19 Japan Bearing Industrial Association*3 58.2 70.4 68.6 10.4 17.9% ▲ 1.8 -2.6%20 Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers*3 61.2 61.0 59.5 ▲ 1.7 -2.8% ▲ 1.5 -2.5%21 Japan Copper and Brass Association*3 61.8 58.3 58.6 ▲ 3.2 -5.2% 0.3 0.5%22 Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association 47.8 35.2 33.4 ▲ 14.4 -30.1% ▲ 1.8 -5.1%23 Limestone Association of Japan 45.3 36.2 35.6 ▲ 9.7 -21.4% ▲ 0.6 -1.7%24 Japan Machine Tool Builders' Association*3 20.8 24.9 26.2 5.4 26.0% 1.3 5.2%25 Japan Petroleum Development Association 15.8 21.8 24.8 9.0 56.8% 3.0 13.9%26 Japan Industrial Vehicles Association 6.1 6.5 6.6 0.4 7.2% 0.1 1.1%

Total of Nippon Keidanren member organizations 36,795.5 35,920.4 36,023.3 ▲ 772.2 -2.1% 102.9 0.3%

27 Japan Textile Finishers' Association 371.0 191.6 175.5 ▲ 195.5 -52.7% ▲ 16.1 -8.4%28 Japan Glass Bottle Association 178.8 107.0 103.6 ▲ 75.2 -42.1% ▲ 3.4 -3.2%29 Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association 52.7 51.3 49.2 ▲ 3.5 -6.6% ▲ 2.1 -4.1%

Total of Non-Nippon Keidanren member organizations 602.5 349.9 328.3 ▲ 274.2 -45.5% ▲ 21.6 -6.2%

37,398.0 36,270.3 36,351.6 ▲ 1046.4 -2.8% 81.3 0.2%

30 Japan Chain Stores Association*3 337.6 693.2 658.3 320.7 95.0% ▲ 34.9 -5.0%31 Japan Franchise Association 87.4 265.4 267.0 179.6 205.6% 1.6 0.6%32 Japan Department Stores Association 96.5 183.1 171.6 75.1 77.8% ▲ 11.5 -6.3%33 Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers*3 56.0 - 56.0 - - - -34 Japan DIY Industry Association*3 52.7 43.4 46.2 ▲ 6.5 -12.3% 2.9 6.6%35 Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association*3 44.9 - 44.9 - - - -36 Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores*3 23.1 25.7 25.9 2.8 12.0% 0.2 0.6%37 Japan Foreign Trade Council*3 5.8 4.6 4.3 ▲ 1.5 -25.9% ▲ 0.3 -6.5%38 Japan LP Gas Association 3.0 3.3 3.3 0.2 7.3% ▲ 0.1 -2.7%39 Japan Leasing Association*3 0.281 0.283 0.282 0.0 0.4% ▲ 0.0 -0.4%

Total of industrial sector

Energy-conversion sector

CO2 emissions

FY2006 (current fiscal year)

Change

Total of energy-conversion sector

IndustryCO2 emissionsCO2 emissions

Total of business/commercial sector 707.3 1,219.0 1,277.8 80.7% -3.5%

Industrial sector

Business/commercial sector

(Nippon Keidanren member industries)

570.5 ▲ 42.2

(Non-Nippon Keidanren member industries)

63

3. Factor analysis of CO2 emissions

*1: For the Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan and Power Producer and Supplier, only the portion attributed to the industry (or of the total CO2 emitted

through electricity production, the portion that can be calculated as having been emitted by the users) is calculated into the total. *2: The Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association calculates CO2 emissions by focusing on electric power consumption per unit. The Japan Machine Tool

Builders’ Association includes the value for output fluctuations in the category for efforts by respective industries in conducting its factor analysis. *3: The base year for CO2 emissions for the following industries is as follows: the Japan Copper and Brass Association – FY1995 (Note that factor analysis of CO2

emission is in comparison to FY1990) , the Japan Aluminium Association – FY1995 (Note that factor analysis of CO2 emission is in comparison to FY1990), the Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association – FY1997, the Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers – FY1997, Power Producer and Supplier – FY2001, the Japan Bearing Industrial Association – FY1997, the Japan Chain Stores Association – FY1996 (Note that the CO2 emission value is for FY1999), the Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores – FY2004, the Japan DIY Industry Association – FY2004, the Japan Leasing Association – FY2002, the Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association – FY2006, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers – FY2006, and the Japan Foreign Trade Council – FY1998

*4: Starting in FY2006, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association began using the value of CO2 emission level for thermal power plants as its method for calculating CO2 emission reduction effect. However, for the purposes of this chart, the average value for all power plants has been used for the sake of consistency.

ChangeEfforts byrespectiveindustries

Fluctuations inoutput

Electric powerconsumption per

unit outputChange

Efforts byrespectiveindustries

Fluctuations inoutput

Electric powerconsumption per

unit output

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan 27,500.0 37,300.0 36,500.0 9,000.0 △ 500.0 9,500.0 － △ 800.0 △ 1,000.0 200.0 －

(own use)*1 3,070.0 3,850.0 3,700.0 630.0 - - － △ 150.0 - - －

Petroleum Association of Japan 3,094.0 4,136.0 4,062.0 968.0 △ 592.0 1,561.0 △ 1.0 △ 74.0 20.0 △ 92.0 △ 2.0Japan Gas Association 133.0 47.0 38.0 △ 95.0 △ 185.0 90.0 0.0 △ 9.0 - - -Power Producer and Supplier (own use)*1　*3 1.1 14.5 18.6 17.5 - - - 4.1 - - -

Total (energy-conversion sector) 6,298.1 8,047.5 7,818.6 1,520.5 △ 777.0 1,651.0 △ 1.0 △ 228.9 20.0 △ 92.0 △ 2.0

Japan Iron and Steel Federation*2 20,371.0 19,046.0 19,326.0 △ 1,045.0 △ 1,570.0 450.0 70.0 280.0 △ 70.0 360.0 △ 20.0

Japan Chemical Industry Association 6,685.0 7,305.0 7,288.0 603.0 △ 1,311.0 1,903.0 11.0 △ 17.0 △ 94.0 56.0 22.0

Japan Paper Association 2,544.8 2,475.3 2,330.1 △ 214.7 △ 428.3 215.1 △ 1.4 △ 145.2 △ 133.0 △ 5.0 △ 7.0

Japan Cement Association 2,741.0 2,177.4 2,184.3 △ 556.7 34.0 △ 590.0 △ 1.0 6.9 35.0 △ 25.0 △ 3.0

4 electrical/electronics-related groups 1,112.0 1,807.2 1,846.0 734.0 △ 706.3 1,399.2 42.0 38.8 △ 79.8 127.0 △ 8.4

Japan Auto Parts Industries Association 714.7 715.7 697.8 △ 16.9 △ 217.4 215.3 △ 14.8 △ 17.9 △ 67.0 60.5 △ 11.4

Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association*2 749.0 576.0 559.0 △ 190.0 △ 356.0 166.0 - △ 17.0 △ 62.0 45.0 －

Japan Mining Industry Association 486.5 497.2 482.5 △ 4.0 △ 110.3 84.6 21.7 △ 14.7 △ 31.2 17.1 △ 0.6

Lime Manufacture Association 354.0 304.9 311.6 △ 42.4 △ 52.0 9.7 △ 0.1 6.7 △ 2.9 8.7 0.9

Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association*4 190.2 225.0 212.2 22.0 △ 16.2 39.6 △ 1.4 △ 12.8 △ 14.1 3.4 △ 2.1

Japan Aluminium Association*3 161.8 160.6 154.1 △ 7.7 △ 15.4 20.3 1.2 △ 6.5 △ 8.9 3.5 △ 1.1

Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan 178.0 132.8 135.8 △ 42.2 5.7 △ 47.2 △ 0.7 3.0 △ 0.7 2.9 0.7

Japan Auto-Body Industries Association 90.9 99.3 100.8 9.9 △ 41.0 57.0 △ 6.1 1.5 △ 6.1 8.9 △ 1.3

Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers' Association 99.6 83.8 81.8 △ 17.8 - - - △ 2.0 - - -

　　　　　　　　　　　(copper/aluminum wire) 97.6 76.0 72.6 △ 25.0 △ 3.7 △ 26.2 4.9 △ 3.4 △ 4.0 0.3 0.2

　　　　　　　　　　　(optic fiber cable) 2.0 7.8 9.2 7.2 △ 14.4 21.8 △ 0.1 1.5 △ 0.2 1.9 △ 0.3

Japan Bearing Industrial Association*3 58.2 70.4 68.6 10.4 △ 19.2 17.6 11.9 △ 1.8 △ 4.0 2.7 △ 0.6

Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers*3 61.2 61.0 59.5 △ 1.7 4.4 △ 10.0 3.9 △ 1.5 △ 6.0 4.5 0.0

Japan Copper and Brass Association*3 61.8 58.3 58.6 △ 3.2 △ 9.4 0.6 1.9 0.3 △ 0.8 2.0 △ 0.9

Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association 47.8 35.2 33.4 △ 14.4 △ 19.6 5.0 0.3 △ 1.8 △ 4.5 2.0 0.8

Limestone Association of Japan 45.3 36.2 35.6 △ 9.7 △ 3.9 △ 6.8 1.0 △ 0.6 △ 0.7 0.3 △ 0.3

Japan Machine Tool Builders' Association*3 20.8 24.9 26.2 5.4 3.1 - 2.3 1.3 1.9 － △ 0.6

Japan Petroleum Development Association 15.8 21.8 24.8 9.0 △ 1.3 11.4 △ 1.2 3.0 2.1 1.2 △ 0.3

Japan Industrial Vehicles Association 6.1 6.5 6.6 0.4 0.7 0.0 △ 0.2 0.1 △ 0.4 0.5 △ 0.0Total (Industrial: Nippon Keidanren member

industries) 36,795.5 35,920.4 36,023.3 △ 772.2 △ 4,847.6 3,936.1 145.2 102.9 △ 551.2 678.4 △ 33.3

Japan Textile Finishers' Association 371.0 191.6 175.5 △ 195.5 23.9 △ 219.2 △ 0.2 △ 16.1 △ 34.0 18.8 △ 0.9

Japan Glass Bottle Association 178.8 107.0 103.6 △ 75.2 △ 10.5 △ 65.0 0.2 △ 3.4 △ 3.4 0.0 0.0

Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association 52.7 51.3 49.2 △ 3.5 △ 14.7 10.7 0.5 △ 2.1 △ 8.9 6.7 0.1Total (Industrial: Non-Nippon Keidanren member

industries) 602.5 349.9 328.3 △ 274.2 △ 1.3 △ 273.4 0.4 △ 21.6 △ 46.3 25.5 △ 0.8

Total of industrial sector 37,398.0 36,270.3 36,351.6 △ 1,046.4 △ 4,848.9 3,662.7 145.6 81.3 △ 597.5 703.9 △ 34.1

Japan Chain Stores Association*3 337.6 693.2 658.3 320.7 - - - △ 34.9 △ 5.8 △ 9.1 △ 19.9

Japan Franchise Association 87.4 265.4 267.0 179.6 △ 61.3 229.9 11.0 1.6 1.5 8.0 △ 7.8

Japan Department Stores Association 96.5 183.1 171.6 75.1 - - - △ 11.5 - - -

Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers*3 56.0 - 56.0 - - - - － - - -

Japan DIY Industry Association*3 52.7 43.4 46.2 △ 6.5 - - - 2.9 5.0 △ 0.1 △ 2.0Japan Information Technology Services IndustryAssociation*3 44.9 - 44.9 - - - - － - - -

Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores*3 23.1 25.7 25.9 2.8 - - - 0.2 △ 4.6 5.5 △ 0.7

Japan Foreign Trade Council*3 5.8 4.6 4.3 △ 1.5 - - - △ 0.3 - - -

Japan LP Gas Association 3.0 3.3 3.3 0.2 △ 0.2 - △ 0.0 △ 0.1 - - △ 0.1

Japan Leasing Association*3 0.281 0.283 0.282 0.0003 - - - △ 0.002 - - -

Total of business/commercial sector 707.3 1,219.0 1,277.8 570.5 △ 61.5 229.9 11.0 △ 42.2 △ 4.0 4.2 △ 30.6

Industrial sector (Non-Nippon Keidanren member industries)



Industrial sector (Nippon Keidanren member industries)

Comparison with base year (FY1990)

Factor analysis of emissions (10000t-CO2)

Base yearIndustry FY2005

(previousfiscal year)

FY2006

CO2 emissions (10000t-CO2)

Comparison with FY2005

64

64

-100%

-80%

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

石油連盟

（社）日本ガス協会

特定規模電気事業

（社）日本化学工業協会

日本製紙連合会

（社）セメント協会

電子・電機４団体

（社）日本自動車工業会

日本鉱業協会

石灰製造工業会

日本ゴム工業会

（社）日本アルミニウム協会

板硝子協会

（社）日本電線工業会（銅・ｱﾙﾐ）

（社）日本電線工業会（光ﾌｧｲﾊﾞ）

日本伸銅協会

日本衛生設備機器工業会

石灰石鉱業協会

（社）日本染色協会

日本ガラスびん協会

（社）日本建設機械工業会

日本チェーンストア協会

（社）日本フランチャイズチェーン協会

日本百貨店協会

日本DIY協会

日本チェーンドラッグストア協会

大手家電流通懇談会

情報サービス産業協会

リース事業協会

電気事業連合会

日本LPガス協会

（社）日本鉄鋼連盟

（社）日本自動車部品工業会

（社）日本自動車車体工業会

（社）日本ベアリング工業会

（社）日本産業機械工業会

（社）日本工作機械工業会

石油鉱業連盟

（社）日本産業車両協会

日本貿易会

電力原単位

生産量

業界努力

全体増減割合

CO2排出増減量要因分析

48

Electric power

consumption per unit

Ot

t

Efforts by respective industries

Ratio of increases or decreases to total

Out put

Japan Foreign Trade Council Japan Industrial Vehicles A

ssociation

Japan Petroleum D

evelopment A

ssociation

Japan Machine Tool Builders’ A

ssociation

Japan Society of Industrial Machinery M

anufacturers

Japan Bearing Industrial Association

Japan Auto-Body Industries A

ssociation

Japan Auto Parts Industries A

ssociation


Japan LP Gas A

ssociation

Federation of Electric Power Com

panies of Japan


Japan Information Technology Services Industry A

ssociation

Meeting of Large H

ousehold Appliance Retailers

Japan Association of Chain D

rug Stores

Japan DIY Industry A

ssociation

Japan Departm

ent Stores Association



Japan Construction Equipment M

anufacturers Association

Japan Glass Bottle A

ssociation

Japan Textile Finishers’ Association

Limestone A

ssociation of Japan

Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry A

ssociation

Japan Copper and Brass Association

Japanese Electric Wire &

Cable Makers’ A

ssociation (optic fiber cable) Japanese Electric W

ire & Cable M

akers’ Association

(Copper/aluminum

)

Flat Glass M

anufacturers Association of Japan

Japan Alum

inium A

ssociation

Japan Rubber Manufacturers A

ssociation

Lime M

anufacture Association

Japan Mining Industry A

ssociation

Japan Autom

obile Manufacturers A

ssociation

Four electrical/electronics-related groups

Japan Cement A

ssociation


Japan Chemical Industry A

ssociation


Japan Gas A

ssociation

Petroleum A

ssociation of Japan

Results of factor analysis of CO2 em

issions

65

4. Factor analysis of CO2 emission intensity

Change Efforts by respectiveindustries Fuel conversion

Electric powerconsumption per unit

outputChange Efforts by respective

industries Fuel conversionElectric power

consumption per unitoutput

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan kg-CO2/kWh 0.417 0.423 0.410 ▲ 0.007 －－－ ▲ 0.013 －－－

Petroleum Association of Japan kg-CO2/kL 24.50 20.72 20.81 ▲ 3.69 ▲ 3.67 ▲ 0.04 0.02 0.09 0.06 0.04 ▲ 0.01

Japan Gas Association g-CO2/m3 84 14 11 ▲ 73 ▲ 73 0 0 ▲ 3 ▲ 3 0 0

Power Producer and Supplier (own use)*2　*3 kg-CO2/kWh 0.54 0.49 0.49 ▲ 0.056 －－－ ▲ 0.005 －－－

Japan Iron and Steel Federation*5 Index 100 92.7 92.3 ▲ 7.7 - - - ▲ 0.4 －－－

Japan Chemical Industry Association Index 100 84 83 ▲ 16.8 ▲ 17.5 ▲ 0.2 0.9 ▲ 0.8 ▲ 2.0 1.6 ▲ 0.4

Japan Paper Association t-CO2/t 0.994 0.890 0.839 ▲ 0.155 ▲ 0.154 － ▲ 0.001 ▲ 0.05 ▲ 0.048 － ▲ 0.002

Japan Cement Association kg-CO2/t 294.4 294.5 298.9 4.500 ▲ 22.200 21.400 5.300 4.400 －－－

4 electrical/electronics-related groups t-CO2/million yen 0.324 0.224 0.214 ▲ 0.1098 ▲ 0.1129 ▲ 0.0068 0.0099 ▲ 0.0106 ▲ 0.0048 ▲ 0.0009 ▲ 0.0049

Japan Auto Parts Industries Association t-CO2/billion yen 589.00 476.1 426.5 ▲ 162.5 －－－ ▲ 49.6 －－－

Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association*4 10000t-CO2/trililion yen 40.3 27.4 24.6 ▲ 15.7 －－－ ▲ 2.7 ▲ 2.4 ▲ 0.3 －

Japan Mining Industry Association t-CO2/t 2.092 1.861 1.744 ▲ 0.348 0.613 ▲ 0.107 ▲ 0.855 ▲ 0.117 0.070 ▲ 0.039 ▲ 0.148

Lime Manufacture Association t-CO2/t 0.342 0.295 0.293 ▲ 0.049 ▲ 0.051 0.001 0.001 ▲ 0.002 ▲ 0.003 0.001 ▲ 0.001

Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association*6 t-CO2/1000t 1492.2 1473.6 1368.6 ▲ 123.6 －－－ ▲ 105.0 －－－

Japan Aluminium Association*2 t-CO2/t 1.06 1.03 0.97 ▲ 0.095 ▲ 0.077 ▲ 0.041 0.023 ▲ 0.063 ▲ 0.025 ▲ 0.027 ▲ 0.011

Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan kg-CO2/box equivalent 46.9 48.4 48.4 1.5 1.1 0.1 0.3 0.0 0.3 ▲ 0.1 ▲ 0.2

Japan Auto-Body Industries Association 10000t-CO2/trillion en 30.7 20.7 19.2 ▲ 11.52 ▲ 9.76 ▲ 2.46 0.70 ▲ 1.48 ▲ 1.13 ▲ 0.09 ▲ 0.26Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers' Association(aluminum wire) 1000t-CO2/1000t 0.530 0.565 0.537 0.00749 ▲ 0.00871 ▲ 0.00736 0.02356 ▲ 0.02832 ▲ 0.01412 ▲ 0.00193 ▲ 0.01227Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers' Association(optic fiber cable) t-CO2/1000kmc 12.70 3.43 3.26 ▲ 9.46 ▲ 9.93 0.00 0.47 ▲ 0.18 ▲ 0.09 0.00 ▲ 0.09

Japan Bearing Industrial Association*2 t-CO2/100000000 yen 172.7 164.7 154.3 ▲ 18.4 ▲ 38.6 ▲ 1.7 21.9 ▲ 10.4 ▲ 6.2 ▲ 0.8 ▲ 3.5Japan Society of Industrial MachineryManufacturers*2 t-CO2/100000000 yen 22.92 29.19 26.39 3.47 1.12 － 2.40 ▲ 2.80 ▲ 1.54 － ▲ 1.20

Japan Copper and Brass Association*2 t-CO2/t 0.827 0.743 0.729 ▲ 0.09362 ▲ 0.10660 ▲ 0.01452 0.02750 ▲ 0.02102 ▲ 0.00664 ▲ 0.00103 ▲ 0.01335

Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association t-CO2/million yen 0.89 0.62 0.55 ▲ 0.339 ▲ 0.301 ▲ 0.051 0.012 ▲ 0.063 ▲ 0.048 ▲ 0.010 ▲ 0.005

Limestone Association of Japan t-CO2/1000t 2.29 2.18 2.12 ▲ 0.163 ▲ 0.220 － 0.057 ▲ 0.058 ▲ 0.031 － ▲ 0.027

Japan Machine Tool Builders' Association*2 t-CO2/million yen 0.200 0.181 0.169 ▲ 0.031 ▲ 0.057 0.000 0.026 ▲ 0.012 ▲ 0.008 0.000 ▲ 0.004

Japan Petroleum Development Association kg-CO2/1000GJ 1.94 1.59 1.73 ▲ 0.221 ▲ 0.06 ▲ 0.17 0.01 0.13 0.02 0.12 ▲ 0.01

Japan Industrial Vehicles Association t-CO2/car 0.38 0.45 0.42 0.038 0.057 ▲ 0.031 0.012 ▲ 0.029 ▲ 0.024 0.001 ▲ 0.006

Japan Textile Finishers' Association t-CO2/10000m2 5.28 7.61 6.11 0.82 1.21 ▲ 0.44 0.05 ▲ 1.50 ▲ 1.45 ▲ 0.02 ▲ 0.03

Japan Glass Bottle Association*1 kg-CO2/t 737.5 792.9 767.8 30.3 －－－ ▲ 25.1 －－－

Japan Construction Equipment ManufacturersAssociation t-CO2/100000000 yen 25.8 23.3 19.6 ▲ 6.256 ▲ 6.112 ▲ 0.900 0.756 ▲ 3.731 ▲ 3.012 ▲ 0.371 ▲ 0.348


Japan Chain Stores Association*2 108kg-CO2/1010m2･h 4.013 4.320 4.158 0.145 ▲ 0.31313 － 0.45908 ▲ 0.1614 ▲ 0.0365519 －▲ 0.1248528

Japan Franchise Association kg-CO2/10m2･h 5.976 4.721 4.609 ▲ 1.3673 ▲ 1.67996 － 0.31271 ▲ 0.1119 0.025486 － ▲ 0.13739

Japan Department Stores Association 108kg-CO2/1010m2･h 4.566 4.260 4.074 ▲ 0.492 －－－ ▲ 0.191 －－－

Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers*2

*3 t-CO2/m2 0.154 － 0.154 0.000 －－－－－－－

Japan DIY Industry Association*2 108kg-CO2/1010m2･h 2.0448 1.7356 1.8562 ▲ 0.189 －－－ 0.120614 0.16952 ▲ 0.0033 ▲ 0.04559

Japan Information Technology Services IndustryAssociation*2 *3 ｋｇ-CO2/m

2 197.127 － 197.127 0.000 －－－－－－－

Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores*2 108kg-CO2/1010m2･h 3.884 3.463 2.817 ▲ 1.067 －－－ ▲ 0.64598 ▲ 0.557 0.002 ▲ 0.091

Japan Foreign Trade Council*2 *3ｋｇ-CO2/m2 － 67.3 63.8 －－－－ ▲ 3.500 －－－

Japan LP Gas Association*3 kg-CO2/t 3.40 3.47 3.43 0.03 －－ 0.03 ▲ 0.04 －－ ▲ 0.04

Japan Leasing Association*2 *3 ｋｇ-CO2/m2 0.05533 0.05533 0.05533 0.000 －－－ 0.000 －－－

Industrial sector (Nippon Keidanren member industries)

Industrial sector (Non-Nippon Keidanren member industries)


Comparison with base yearUnitBase year

Industry FY2005(previous

fiscal year)FY2006

CO2 emission intensity Factor analysis of emission intensity

Comparison with FY2005

*1: The CO2 emission for Japan Glass Bottle Association includes CO2 emitted from carbonate used as an ingredient. *2: The base year for CO2 emissions for the following industries is as follows: the Japan Copper and Brass Association – FY1995 (Note that the value for CO2

emission intensity is for FY1990) , the Japan Aluminium Association – FY1995 (Note that the value for CO2 emission intensity is for FY1990), the Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association – FY1997, the Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers – FY1997, Power Producer and Supplier – FY2001, the Japan Bearing Industrial Association – FY1997, the Japan Chain Stores Association – FY1996 (Note that the value for CO2 emission intensity is for FY2000), the Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores – FY2004, the Japan DIY Industry Association – FY2004, the Japan Leasing Association – FY2002, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association – FY2006, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers – FY2006, and the Japan Foreign Trade Council – FY1998

*3: Companies/bodies that began participating in the Voluntary Action Plans include Power Producer and Supplier, the Japan LP Gas Association, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers, the Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, the Japan Leasing Association, and the Japan Foreign Trade Council.

*4: The CO2 emission coefficient of purchased electricity for the Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association is not included as the factor because it was established as such in fiscal 1990.

*5: The CO2 emission intensity for the Japan Iron and Steel Federation uses the same value for energy intensity. *6: Starting in FY2006, the Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association adopted using the value of CO2 emission level for thermal power plants as the calculating

method for CO2 emission reduction effect. However, for the purposes of this chart, the average value for all power plants has been used for the sake of consistency.

- 39 -

66

FEPC: Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, PAJ: Petroleum Association of Japan, JGA: Japan Gas Association, JMIA: Japan Mining Industry Association, LAJ: Limestone Association of Japan, JPDA: Japan Petroleum Development Association, JAMA: Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, JAPIA: Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, JABIA: Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, JIVA: Japan Industrial Vehicles Association, JISF: Japan Iron and Steel Federation, 4EE: Four electrical/electronics-related groups, JMTBA: Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, CEMA: Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, JSIM: Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, JBIA: Japan Bearing Industrial Association, JPA: Japan Paper Association, JCA: Japan Cement Association, FGMAJ: Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, JTFA: Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, JSEIA: Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, JGBA: Japan Glass Bottle Association, JCIA: Japan Chemical Industry Association, LMA: Lime Manufacture Association, JRMA: Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, JCMA: Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, JAA: Japan Aluminium Association, JCBA: Japan Copper and Brass Association, JCSA: Japan Chain Stores Association, JFA: Japan Franchise Association, JDSA: Japan Department Stores Association, JDIY: Japan DIY Industry Association, JACDS: Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, PPS: Power Producer and Supplier, JITSIA: Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, MLHAR: Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers, JLA: Japan Leasing Association, JLPGA: Japan LP Gas Association, JFTC: Japan Foreign Trade Council

JMIA LAJ

FEPC

JISF

JAPIA

JAMIA

JIVA JSIM

JMTBA

JTFA

JRMA

PAJ

JAMA

JCA

FGMAJ

JCIA

LMAJAA

JCMA (copper)

JCBA

JDIY

JACDS

JGBA

JLA

JFTC

JPDA

JBIA

-60%

-40%

-20%

0%

20%

40%

60%-60%-40%-20%0%20%40%60%

Percentage change inenergy intensity (%)

☆　JGA

◎　PPS

☆　4EE

☆　JCMA (optic fiber)

◎　JCSA

◎　JFA

(Improvement)

(Deterioration)

(Improvement)(Deterioration)

☆ JDSA Percentagechange in CO2emissions (%)

5. Changes in industries’ C

O 2 em

issions and energy intensity (from

base year)

67

6. Utilization of the Kyoto Mechanisms

As a measure to be used in case of the difficulty of achieving targets, four industries report that they began utilizing the Kyoto Mechanisms during the current fiscal year and five industries report that they will study measures including the utilization of the Kyoto Mechanisms.

(Utilization of Kyoto Mechanisms)

○: Started utilizing Kyoto Mechanisms △: Will study measures including the utilization of Kyoto Mechanisms ◇: Can achieve target and therefore the utilization of mechanisms is not necessary －: Not studying utilization of Kyoto Mechanisms

Utilization of Kyoto

Mechanisms Utilization of Kyoto

Mechanisms Industry This fiscal year

Previous fiscal year

Industry This fiscal year

Previous fiscal year

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan ○ ○ Japan Iron and Steel Federation ○ ○

Petroleum Association of Japan*1 ○ ○ Japan Paper Association*2 ◇ ◇

Japan Gas Association △ △ Japan Cement Association △ ◇

Japan Mining Industry Association ◇ ◇ Japan Chemical Industry Association ◇ ◇

Limestone Association of Japan ◇ ◇ Lime Manufacture Association ◇ ◇ Japan Petroleum Development Association*1

○ ○ Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association ◇ ◇

Power Producers and Suppliers ◇ (Non-participant)

Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association ◇ ◇

Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association ◇ ◇ Japan Aluminium Association ◇ ◇

Japan Auto Parts Industries Association △ － Japan Copper and Brass Association ◇ ◇

Japan Auto-Body Industries Association △ － Japan Textile Finishers’ Association ◇ ◇

Japan Industrial Vehicles Association △ ◇ Japan Chain Stores Association －－ Four electrical/ electronics-related groups △ △ Japan Franchise Association －－

Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association △ △ Japan Department Stores Association －－

Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association

△ △ Japan DIY Industry Association －－

Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers △ △ Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores －－

Japan Bearing Industrial Association ◇ ◇ Japan Foreign Trade Council △ (Non-participant)

Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan ◇ ◇ Japan LP Gas Association�3 △

(Non-participant)

Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association ◇ ◇ Japan Information Technology Services

Industry Association － (No-particip

ant) Japan Glass Bottle Association ◇ ◇ Japan Leasing Association － (Non-partici

pant) Meeting of Large Household Appliance

Retailers － (Non-participant)

*1 These entities currently consider that their targets can be achieved by way of implementation of energy-conservation and other measures and have not reported the amount of credits acquired by the industry as a whole. However, they have reported case examples of their member companies.

*2 The association considers that its target can be achieved by way of capital expenditures, while its member companies are making efforts to achieve their targets, such as striving to achieve the approval of afforestation CDM projects.

*3 Currently, the industry as a whole is not taking any measures to achieve its target. However, some companies intend to acquire credits.

68

(Case examples of utilization of Kyoto Mechanisms) ■Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan: ・The federation is expected to acquire a total of about 120 million t-CO2 worth of credits from carbon funds

and CDM projects by FY2012.

Status of measures taken by way of utilizing Kyoto Mechanism

Content of measure Host country Content of measure Host

country

・Japan GHG Reduction Fund (JGRF) －

・World Bank Prototype Carbon Fund (PCF) － Total amount of investment: about 28.5 billion yen

Carbon Fund ・Greenhouse Gas Credit Aggregation Pool (GG-CAP), etc. －

・Song Muc Hydro Power Station Regeneration Project in Vietnam Vietnam ・Bioenergia Cogeradora Brazil

・Biomass Power Project Honduras・BT Geradora de Energia Elétrica S. A. – Ferradura Small Hydro

Power Plant – Small Scale CDM Project Brazil

・The 30 MW Tuoli Wind-Farm Project in Urumqi, Xinjiang of China

China ・Pesqueiro Energia Small Hydroelectric Project Brazil

・Methane Capture and Combustion from Swine Manure Treatment Chile ・Koblitz - Piratini Energia S. A - Biomass Power Plant – Small

Scale CDM Project Brazil

・e7 Bhutan Micro Hydro Power CDM Project Bhutan ・ARAPUCEL Small Hydroelectric Power Plants Project Brazil

・Luertai 12.2 MW Hydropower Station Project China ・Cachoeira Encoberta and Triunfo Small Hydroelectric Power Plants Project Activity

Brazil

・Kanfeng 15 MW Hydropower Station Project China ・Nova Sinceridade Small Hydroelectric Power Plant Project Activity

Brazil

・Loma Los Colorados Landfill Gas Project Chile ・Palestina Small Hydroelectric Power Plant Project Activity Brazil ・Inner Mongolia Chifeng Dongshan 49.3 MW Wind Power Project China ・Furnas do Segredo Small Hydro Power Plant Brazil ・Caieiras landfill gas emission reduction Brazil ・Southeast Caeté Mills Bagasse Cogeneration Project Brazil

・Graneros Plant Fuel Switching Project Chile ・Catalytic N2O Abatement Project in the Tail Gas of the Nitric

Acid Plant of the Pakarab Fertilizer Ltd (PVT) Pakistan

・Empty Fruit Bunch Biomass Project Malaysia ・Lepanto Landfill Gas Management Project Chile ・HFC23 Decomposition Project of Zhejiang Juhua Co., Ltd China ・Aquarius Small Hydro Project Brazil ・Hydropower Project in Mongolia Mongolia ・La Vuelta and La Herradura Hydropower Project Colombia・N2O decomposition project of Henan China ・Trupan Biomass Power Plant in Chile Chile ・Hydropower Project in Karnataka India ・Methane Capture and Power Generation Project in Jiangsu China ・Usinas Itamarati Cogeneration Project Brazil ・Hebei Wind Power Project China

Projects approved by the CDM

Executive Board ・WHR based power project at Chhattisgarh India ・South Nyirseg Bioenergy Project Hungary ・Sichuan Hydropower Project China ・Saint Matilda Biomass Power Project Honduras ・Ranteballa Small Hydropower Project Indnesia ・Danpa Hydropower Project China ・Mongolia Natural Gas Power Project China

・A.T. Biopower Rice Husk Power Project Thailand ・Hydropower CDM Project (Xinjiang Tian Fu Thermal Electric

Power Plant) China

・Wind Farm Project in Ningxia Autonomous Area China ・Biogas CDM Project Thailand ・Gansu Datang Yumen Wind Power Project China ・Guangdong Wind Power Project China ・Coal Methane Recovery Project in Donetsk region Ukraine ・Wulabo Wind Power Project in Urumqi, Xinjiang China ・Co-composting of EFB and POME Malaysia ・Gansu Hydropower Project China ・El Henequen Landfill Gas Project Colombia ・N2O Emission Reduction in Onsan Korea ・Yunnan Hydropower Project China ・PT. Indonesia Power’s Hydropower Plant Development Project Indonesia

Projects approved by the government of Japan

・Sichuan Bazhong Hydropower Project China

69

■Japan Iron and Steel Federation ・Plans to acquire a total of 44 million t-CO2 (8.8 million t/year) worth of credits from FY2008 to FY2012

Project or fund Amount of GHG reduction (million t-CO2)

Investment in the Japan GHG Reduction Fund (JGRF) and the Bio Carbon Fund 1 (million t-CO2)

Contracts on CDM and other projects ・ Iron and steel energy-saving technology (CDQ/China,

recovery of sintering waste heat/Philippines)

・ Iron and steel engineering technology (chlorofluorocarbon treatment/China)

43 (million t-CO2)

Total 44 (million t-CO2)*

*Out of the total, 31 million t-CO2 worth of credits have been registered at the United Nations.

CDM Projects Undertaken by Steel Companies (and Registered at the United Nations)

Entity Undertaking Projects

Host country Project title

Amount of CO2 emission reduction

(10,000CO2/year)

Crediting Period

Amount of credits during the first period under contracts(10,000CO2)

Nippon Steel Corporation, Mitsubishi Corporation

China Shandong Dongyue HFC23 Decomposition Project 1,011 Seven-year period starting

in July 2007 1,000 *2

Nippon Steel Corporation China

Installation of waste heat recovery system in a coking plant in Qian’an City, China

21 10-year period starting in October 2006 105

JFE Steel Corporation Philippines

Philippine Sinter Corporation Sinter Cooler Waste Heat Recovery Power Generation Project

5.5 10-year period starting in January 2008 27.5

Notes:

1. The above data shows the breakdown of 31 million t-CO2 worth of credits, and consists of the projects undertaken by steel companies.

2. The above-mentioned amount of credits for the Shandong Dongyue HFC23 Decomposition Project only includes the amount related to Nippon Steel

Corporation.

■Petroleum Association of Japan ・The association has concluded that in the case of difficulty in achieving its target, it will use the Kyoto

Mechanisms and transfer the credits acquired by CDM projects for the amount of unachieved portion of its target (over a five–year period) to the government free of charge.

・ Petroleum companies engage in the following CDM projects overseas, while proactively investing in funds such as the CDCF and JGRF.

70

CDM Projects Undertaken by Petroleum Companies (Excluding projects approved by the CDCF and JGRF)

Outline of CDM projects Amount of reduction

(10,000t-CO2/year)Capture and effective utilization of associated gas obtained in oil drilling in Vietnam 68

Methane capture in landfills in Brazil 66

Replacement of purchased power with the power generated by biomass-fueled power

generators in Brazil

18

Gas power generation at landfill facilities in Brazil 17

Improvement of efficiency in the operation of coal boilers in China 0.56 ※The above data is based on the public announcement regarding the projects approved by the government (as of August 20, 2007)

■Japan Petroleum Development Association

・Currently, the association does not intend to use the Kyoto Mechanisms to make up for the unachieved portion of its target, although it will continue to examine and implement various activities in which it engages, including gas emission reduction efforts overseas, promotion of development of natural gas, and development of technology for combating global warming.

(Status of measures taken by way of utilization of Kyoto Mechanisms)

Project or Fund

Amount of greenhouse gas

reduction (10,000t)

Type of participation

Use of associated gas in oil fields in Vietnam

About 680

Participation by member

companies and their corporate

groups

Japan GHG Reduction Fund

100



groups

World Bank BioCarbon Fund 207



groups, as well as by individual

member companies (the reduction

amounts have been provided)

Energy-saving coal boilers in Yantai city, Shangdong

province, China 3



groups

Recovery and decomposition of HFC23 discharged

through CFC substitutes in China About 4,000


companies

71

7. Strengthening efforts in the commercial and transport sectors ・This year, the following industries reported quantitative data regarding CO2 emission reductions by

way of diffusion of energy-saving products, improvement in logistics efficiency, and efforts related to office buildings.

(1) Business/commercial sector (office buildings, etc.) i) Status of CO2 emissions in the business/commercial sector [15 industries]

With regard to CO2 emissions in the business/commercial sector (office buildings, etc.), 15 energy-conversion and industrial sector reported the following results.

<CO2 Emissions at office buildings, etc.>

CO2 emissions (1000t-CO2) Industry

FY2004 FY2005 FY2006

(1) Japan Gas Association*1 － 21.2 20.6

(2) Japan Iron and Steel Federation*2 － 11.3 10.9

(3) Japan Paper Association － 20.0 20.0

(4) Japan Auto Parts Industries Association － 218.2 216.8

(5) Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association*3 － 51.1 49.1

(6) Japan Mining Industry Association*4 － 2.5339 －

(7) Lime Manufacture Association *5 － 0.9 1.0

(8) Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan *6 0.888 0.900 0.881

(9) Japan Auto-Body Industries Association *7 － 8.1 8.7

(10) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association *8 4.1176 3.4977 4.3859

(11) Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers *9 － 29.5 31.5

(12) Japan Copper and Brass Association *10 － 0.259 0.247

(13) Limestone Association of Japan *11 － 0.2 0.2

(14) Japan Petroleum Development Association － 5.71 5.26

(15) Japan LP Gas Association *12 0.3 0.4 0.6

*1: 15 business operators with more than 300 employees *2: A total of 23 companies in the steel industry *3: A total of 14 member companies *4: Data is based on the questionnaire results from nine companies. *5: Data is based on the questionnaire results from 37 companies (FY2005), and 40 companies (FY2006). *6: Data is based on the questionnaire results from three companies. *7: A total of 12 companies *8: Data is based on the questionnaire results from 14 companies. Of them, eight major companies set targets for 2008~2012 (2.8864) *9: A total of 50 member companies *10: A total of fhree companies *11:One company *12: Data is based on the questionnaire results from 7 companies (FY2004), 14 companies (FY2005) and 16 companies (FY2006).

72

<Status of CO2 emissions and emission targets in the business/commercial sector>


FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 Target for FY2008~2012

Japan Chain Stores Association 582.3 693.2 658.3 －

Japan Franchise Association 260.12 265.39 266.97 －


173.94 183.11 171.64 －

Japan DIY Industry Association 52.674 43.354 46.219 －

Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores

23.11 25.73 25.89 －

Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers

－－ 55.96 －

Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association

－－ 44.9405 36.0929

Japan Leasing Association 0.27 0.28 0.28 －

Japan Foreign Trade Council 5.6 4.6 4.3 3.5Japan LP Gas Association 3.3135 3.3463 3.2560 2.7653

ii) Targets for energy-saving measures in the business/commercial sector (office buildings, etc.)

[12 industries] A total of 12 industries reported that they have set targets with regard to energy-saving measures for office buildings, etc.

<Status of target setting>

Industry Details regarding target setting

(1) Japan Gas Association

Major business operators are promoting energy-saving measures by setting their own targets. Reducing CO2 emission intensity per total floor space in offices, including those of affiliated

companies, in fiscal 2010 by 2% from the level in fiscal 2006 Reducing the CO2 emission intensity of gas and electricity consumption to less than 90.0 kg-CO2

per 1㎡ of office in fiscal 2008, etc.

(2) Japan Chemical Industry Association

More than 30 companies have set voluntary reduction targets. Promotion of energy savings at offices: Reducing electricity consumption by 6% from the level in

fiscal 1990s by fiscal 2010 Reducing annual electricity consumption at head and branch offices by 1%, etc.

(3) Four electrical/ electronics-related groups

Striving to raise the execution rate of energy-saving measures by about 10% for FY2008-2010

(4) Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan

Annual 2% reduction in CO2 emissions at offices (One of the three member companies has set the target.)

(5) Japan Bearing Industrial Association

Individual companies are promoting energy-saving measures by setting their targets. Electricity consumption: 1% reduction from the previous year (Company A) Reduction of the annual energy consumption rate by 1%. (Company B)

(6) Japan Copper and Brass Association

Individual companies are promoting energy-saving measures by setting their targets. Reducing the energy consumption intensity (Ml/m2) of the entirety of offices in the

business/commercial sector in fiscal 2010 by 5% from the level in fiscal 2005 (7) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association

Eight major companies have set targets for CO2 emissions reduction at offices for FY2008-2010.

73

(8) Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association

Individual companies are promoting energy-saving measures by setting their targets. Company A: Reducing total CO2 emissions at the end of fiscal 2008 by 17% (from 1997) Company B: Reducing total CO2 emissions at the end of fiscal 2010 by 20% (from fiscal 1990)

(9) Japan LP Gas Association

Individual companies are promoting energy-saving measures by setting their targets. Company A: Set a target for 3.15-CO2/year reduction by turning off lights at lunchtime and stringently

regulating air conditioning temperatures, etc. Company B: Reducing electricity consumption by 10% from the level in fiscal 1999 (average for

FY2008~2010), etc.

(10) Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan

Individual companies have set specific targets for the following measures. Reduction of electricity and city water consumption All business establishments are to establish environmental management systems and set office

targets, etc. (11) Japan Textile Finishers’ Association

Seven business establishments of individual companies are promoting energy-saving measures by setting their targets.

(12) Japan Franchise Association

Each chain store is promoting energy-saving measures by setting its own target. Reducing FY2008 electricity consumption at head-office buildings by 10% from fiscal 2005 Holding FY2007 electricity consumption at offices to less than the level in fiscal 2006, etc.

iii) Reduction effects of energy-saving measures in the business/commercial sector (office buildings, etc.) [Five industries]

Five industries reported on the industry-wide reduction effects of energy-saving measures.

(Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan) ・The total electricity consumption at offices of electric power suppliers in fiscal 2006 came to 930

million kWh, representing an energy saving of about 140 million kWh (about 13%), or about 20,000t- CO2.

(Petroleum Association of Japan) ・The energy consumption at head-office buildings in fiscal 2006 decreased by about 5% from the

previous year (fiscal 2005) and CO2 emissions in the same year decreased by about 7%. (The total value of 11 companies with head offices outside their oil refineries)

(Japan Cement Association) ・The amount of CO2 saved by six cement manufacturers in fiscal 2006 (eight companies were covered

in the survey) came to about 962t- CO2 as a result of the implementation of energy-saving measures at office buildings, etc.

(Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association) ・A total of 14.12t- CO2 were conserved through such measures as turning off lights at lunchtime,

taking pains to turn off unnecessary lights, keeping the lights in conference rooms off when not in use, promoting management of air conditioning temperature at 28℃, turning off OA equipment when not in use, and promoting Candle Night. (Fiscal 2006)

(Japan Textile Finishers’ Association) ・The industry reduced or plan to reduce 2.695t-CO2 (cumulative), 6.79t-CO2 (fiscal 2006) and

6.425t-CO2 (planned) by promoting such measures as turning on fewer and dimming lights, turning off lights at lunchtime, upgrading to inverter-type lights, regulating air conditioning temperatures, and converting to gas refrigerating equipment.

The following reports were made about case examples of energy-conservation measures.

1) Reduction in air conditioning energy consumption [Report from 36 industries]

Setting of cooling and heating temperatures at 28℃ and 20℃, respectively.

74

(Actual case example) ・By setting cooling temperature at 28℃ and heating temperature at 20℃, CO2 emissions were

reduced by 17.05t-CO2/year and 12.08t-CO2/year, respectively. (Japan Leasing Association) Suspending the intake of external air (Actual case example) ・By suspending the intake of external air, CO2 emissions were reduced by 6.54t-CO2/year. (Japan

Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association) Use of ice thermal storage air conditioners and cogeneration. (Actual case example) ・ By introducing ice thermal storage air conditioners, CO2 emissions were reduced by

541.32t-CO2/year. (Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association)

<Industries that submitted reports (36 industries)> * The industries in bold type are those that reported quantitative reduction effects of

their energy-conservation measures. (14 industries)

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Power Producers and Suppliers, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Paper Association, Japan Cement Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Limestone Association of Japan, Japan Petroleum Development Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association, Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, Japan Glass Bottle Association, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, Japan Leasing Association, Japan Foreign Trade Council, Japan LP Gas Association

2) Lighting energy conservation [Report from 36 industries]

Turning off lights in offices at lunchtime and during non-working hours when not in use (Actual case examples) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 24.16t-CO2/year by turning off lights at lunchtime and whenever

not needed. (Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 1.25t-CO2/year by strictly requiring that employees to turn off

their PCs when leaving their office. (Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association) Turning on fewer lights and dimming lights in corridors, elevator halls, and parking lots (Actual case examples) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 3.06t-CO2/year by turning on fewer lights. (Japanese Electric

Wire & Cable Makers’ Association)

Introduction of inverters, human sensors, and highly efficient lighting fixtures. (Actual case examples) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 82.78t-CO2/year by replacing existing lighting fixtures with

inverter-type fixtures. (Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 93.37t-CO2/year by introducing highly efficient lighting fixtures.

(Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association)

<Industries that submitted reports (36 industries)> * The industries in bold type are those that reported quantitative reduction effects of their energy-conservation measures. (17 industries)

75

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Power Producers and Suppliers, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Cement Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Limestone Association of Japan, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Petroleum Development Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association, Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, Japan Glass Bottle Association, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, Japan Leasing Association, Japan Foreign Trade Council, Japan LP Gas Association

3) Building-related energy conservation [Report from 26 industries]

Reduction of number of elevators in use (Actual case examples) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 28.07t-CO2/year by reducing the number of elevators in use.

(Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores)

Installation of infrared heat-shielding films on windows (Actual case examples) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 8.13t-CO2/year by installing infrared heat-shielding films on

windows in order to raise indoor adiabatic effects. (Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores)

Shutdown of automatic vending machine at night (Actual case examples)

・CO2 emissions were reduced by 4.93t-CO2/year by shutting down automatic vending machines at night. (Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association)

<Industries that submitted reports (26 industries)> * The industries in bold type are those that reported quantitative reduction effects of their

energy-conservation measures. (ten industries) Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Power Producer and Supplier, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Cement Association, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Petroleum Development Association, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan Foreign Trade Council, Japan LP Gas Association

4) Introduction of new energy and highly efficient equipment [Report from 25 industries]

Introduction of highly efficient water heater (Actual case examples) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 121.27t-CO2/year by introducing highly efficient water heaters for

industrial use.（Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association）

Introduction of solar energy generation (Actual case examples) ・CO2 emissions were reduced by 15.04t-CO2/year by introducing solar energy generation

76

equipment. (Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association）

<Industries that submitted reports (25 industries)> * The industries in bold type are those that reported quantitative reduction effects of their energy-conservation measures. (nine industries) Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Cement Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, Lime Manufacture Association , Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Petroleum Development Association, Limestone Association of Japan, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, Japan Leasing Association, Japan Foreign Trade Council

77

(2) Commercial sector i) Expansion of the use of environmental household account books【Efforts being made by 16 industries】

Industries reporting specific measures being taken

Actual case example Effect・Performance

Started industry-wide efforts this fiscal year with theaim of expanding the use of environmentalhousehold account books by more than 250,000employees of member corporations

As of the end of August 2007, about 6,000 households are using environmental household account books

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan

Promotion of customer participation About 30,000 customers are participating. Japan Gas Association Conducted diagnosis on employees’

energy-conservation behavior ・Number of employees participated: About 13,800 (about 40% of gas industry employees), Number of businesses participating: 139 ・CO2 reduction effect: 11,000t-CO2/year ・CO2 reduction effect: 4,000t-CO2/year (in the future)


Expansion of the use of environmental household account books

Used by 2,800 households in fiscal 2006 (about 6% of the households of employees of five blast furnace steelmakers) The number expected to increase further in fiscal 2007 and beyond

Four electrical/electronics-related groups

Promotion of environmental household account books

Being promoted by 57 companies


Inaugurated activities to promote the use of environmental household account books in 1998

To date, 500 people have participated.

<Industries that submitted reports (16 industries)> * The industries in bold type are those that reported quantitative reduction effects of their

energy-conservation measures. (five industries) Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Paper Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Copper and Brass Association, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Limestone Association of Japan, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, Japan LP Gas Association

ii) Contribution through energy-saving products and services [Report from 26 industries]

[Examples of products promoted for use]

Product name Overview Industry

High-efficiency water heaters “Eco Cute”

Cumulative spread standing at 830,000 units (as of the end of fiscal 2006) Reduction effect on CO2 emissions by about 600,000t-CO2

Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan

Gas engine water heaters “Eco Will”

Sales performance: 410,000 units About 32% higher CO2 reduction effect than conventional water heaters


Super-insulated double-glazed glass

CO2 emissions can be reduced by 172.6 million t-CO2 by using double-glazed glasses for windows to enhance windows’ heat-insulating capacity. (Diffusion rate of double-glazed glass in newly built houses in fiscal 2006: 90.6% in single-family houses, 42.2% in apartment buildings)

Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan

Energy-saving electric appliances, highly efficient OA equipment for industrial use,

etc.

CO2 emissions can be reduced by 53 million t-CO2 by enhancing the efficiency of electronic devices.

Four electrical/electronics -related groups

78

Water-saving toilet stools The average water consumption by toilets was reduced from 13L to 5-6L, and thereby CO2 emissions decreased.


Highly efficient grooved steel pipes

CO2 emissions can be reduced by 23.36 million t-CO2 in fiscal 2006 by replacing copper pipes used in air-conditioning heat exchangers with highly efficient grooved copper pipes.


Heat-insulating materials Vinyl chloride double-glazed

window sashes

Spread of heat-insulating materials, such as expanded styrene foam, and vinyl chloride double-glazed window sashes will contribute to energy savings of houses.

Japan Chemical Industry Association

Energy-saving OA equipment CO2 emissions can be reduced by promoting leasing transactions of energy-saving equipment (such as OA equipment).


<Industries that submitted reports (26 industries)> Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Japan Cement Association, Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Copper and Brass Association, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association (重複しています), Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers, Japan Information Technology Services Industry Association, Japan Leasing Association, Japan LP Gas Association, Japan Foreign Trade Council

iii) Evaluation from the perspective of LCA [Report from 17 industries]

（Evaluation examples）・By using refilling pouches instead of bottles for household liquid detergent, CO2 emissions can be

reduced 45% more than using bottles. (Japan Chemical Industry Association) ・By using highly efficient grooved copper pipes produced by the Japan Copper and Brass

Association,CO2 emissions can be reduced by 41,015kg-CO2 more per air conditioner in 10 years than using bare pipes. (Japan Copper and Brass Association)

<Industries that submitted reports (17 industries)> Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Cement Association, Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Copper and Brass Association, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Construction Equipment Manufacturers Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association

iv) Status of CO2 emissions reduction through recycling [Report from 19 industries]

Promotion of recycling of home appliances (Actual case examples) ・Home appliance recycling holds CO2 emissions to about one-sixth the amount emitted in the case of

producing home appliances from raw materials. CO2 emissions were reduced by 22,000 tons in 2004. (Four electrical/electronics-related groups)

Promotion of reuse of paper (Japan Paper Association） Recycling of plastic bottle materials (Japan Chemical Industry Association) Recycling of aluminum cans (Actual case examples) ・The recycling rate of aluminum cans (collection and recycling) in fiscal 2006 was 90.9%. reducing

OO2 emissions by about 12.66 million tons. (Japan Aluminium Association)

79

<Industries that submitted reports (19 industries)> Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Paper Association, Japan Cement Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Copper and Brass Association, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association

v) Environmental education and information provision [Report from 16 industries]

Enlightenment on energy conservation (Actual case examples) ・Campaign to phase out plastic shopping bags (Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association) ・Copies of the “Ultra Energy-Saving Book” were published and distributed, while the “Ultra

Energy-Saving Simulation ” was paticipated in by about 20,000 people. (Japan Gas Association) Provision of support for environmental learning (Actual case examples) ・Enlightenment of people on energy saving by providing environmental energy education, such as

efficient use of electricity in class. (Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan)

<Industries that submitted reports (16 industries)> Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan Paper Association, Japan Cement Association, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Meeting of Large Household Appliance Retailers, Japan Foreign Trade Council

80

(3) Transport sector i) Status of CO2 emissions in the transport sector

A total of 14 industries reported on CO2 emissions performance in the transport sector.

<CO2 emissions in the transport sector>


FY2004 FY2005 FY2006 FY 2008～2012 target

(1) Japan Gas Association *1 １．１１．１１．１－

(2) Japan Iron and Steel Federation *2 －４４．０１５９．１－

(3) Japan Paper Association *3 －６１．２６２．７－

(4) Four electrical/electronics-related groups －－３０．６－

(5) Japan Auto Parts Industries Association *4 －２．４２．７－

(6) Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association *5

－－１０４．７－

(7) Lime Manufacture Association *6 －０．４０．４－

(8) Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan *7

－－３．６－

(9) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association

－－４．６－

(10) Japan Copper and Brass Association 8 －０．２０．２－

(11) Limestone Association of Japan *9 －０．８０．８－

(12) Japan Petroleum Development Association

３．１３．１２．７６．４

(13) Japan Franchise Association*10 ０．９１．０１．１－

(14) Japan LP Gas Association －－１３．９－

*1 Actual performance by the four major city gas suppliers (Approximately 83% of total production of city gas was produced by the four suppliers.) *2 The number of participating companies increased from 10 to 21 in fiscal 2006. *3 Responses were obtained from 12 of the 13 Physical Distribution Committee member companies. *4 The industry plans to set a FY2008～2012 target value in the next fiscal year (CO2 emissions per transportation amount) *5 Responses were obtained from all 14 member companies. *6 The amount of energy consumed in in-plant distribution *7 Actual performance of two of the three companies in the industry engaged in in-house distribution *8 Numerical value of the only one company engaged in in-house distribution *9 Physical distribution by outsourcees or affiliated companies *10 CO2 emissions produced by deliver vehicles per shore

Reduction effects were reported by 21 industries 1. Industries showing industry-wide reduction effects (seven industries)

Industry Reduction effect

(1) Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan

Use of company-owned vehicles helped reduce fuel consumption (gasoline and diesel oil) by 28,000kl (about 12%) in fiscal 2006. As a result, CO2 emissions in the year were reduced by about 10,000t-CO2 from the level in fiscal 2000.

(2) Japan Aluminium Association The domestic transportation distance was shortened by about half, following a review of unloading procedures for imported unprocessed metal. As a result, energy consumption related to domestic transportation was reduced by about 7%.


Some individual companies reduced CO2 emissions from business vehicles by 9.9% from the previous year by promoting the introduction of a business vehicles management system and a switch to hybrid minicars.

81

(4) Japan Textile Finishers’ Association

CO2 emissions were reduced by about 57 kg-CO2 in fiscal 2006 by reducing the consumption of diesel oil for company-operated vehicles by 2% and through operation management of company-owned business vehicles. In the years to come, the industry plans to reduce CO2 emissions by about 50 kg-CO2/year.

(5) Japan Glass Bottle Association Some individual companies reduced CO2 emissions by 70t-CO2/year by reviewing their transportation routes.

(6) Japan Chain Stores Association Some individual companies conducted modal shift experiments and used rail containers for long-distance transport (Tokyo-Hokkaido) in cooperation with forwarders, resulting in the reduction of CO2 emissions by 87%.

(7) Japan Department Stores Association

Mitsukoshi department store has reduced CO2 emissions from vehicles by an average 1,400 t-CO2/year by introducing a merchandise delivery agency system in its non-food, food and restaurant divisions and expanding the system to its outlets one after another.

2. Industries showing reduction effects of individual measures (14 industries) Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Paper Association, Japan Cement Association, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Copper and Brass Association, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan LP Gas Association

ii) Target setting [Report from ten industries] Ten industries reported that have set a target with regard to efforts in the transport sector.

Industry Details regarding target setting

■Specific targets are set by individual companies.. (1) Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan

Reduction of the amount of fuel consumed by vehicles Increasing the ratio of introduction of low-emission vehicles Implementing “No-car days”, etc.

(2) Petroleum Association of Japan ■Following the revision of the energy saving law, primary distributors of petroleum have set their nonbonding targets instead of conventional industry-wide targets, as they have become specified cargo owners under the revised law.

(3) Japan Gas Association

■Examples of original targets set by business operators Increasing the introduction rate of natural gas cars to 100% in fiscal 2010 (excluding emergency mobile workshops and special-purpose) Increasing the ratio of natural gas cars to total company vehicles to 75% in fiscal 2008 Thorough promotion of eco-driving , such as anti-idling practices

(4) Japan Aluminium Association ■Six major rolled steel manufacturers are subject to control under the revised energy-saving law.

CO2 emissions reduction by 1% per year in the transport sector ■Industry-wide targets are set. (Target set by industry)

Striving to reduce the energy consumption intensity in fiscal 2010 to 96% of the level in fiscal 1996 by reducing energy consumption intensity (kl/million t-km crude oil equivalent) by 1% every fiscal year (target of ten Distribution Committee member companies)

(Targets set for respective items)

(5) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association

Increase of the modal shift rate (the rate of utilization of JR’s containers and domestic vessels) to 36.7% by 2010. (The rate was 28.6% in fiscal 2006.) Promotion of the joint delivery of products from different suppliers to city construction sites. (The number of trucks used in fiscal 2006 decreased 31%..)

82


■Specific targets are set by individual companies. Reducing the ratio of CO2 emissions reduction to sales by 2% from the

previous year (Company A) Reducing the purchase of gasoline for company-owned cars by 1% from the

previous year (Company B)., etc.


■Specific targets are set by individual companies. Improving transportation fuel by 6% by end of fiscal 2007 (as compared with

fiscal 2004), etc.

(8) Japan Chain Stores Association

Chain store operators have been establishing efficient distribution formula by adopting a so-called “Madoguchi Tonya system,” under which they place orders for various products in small lots, a joint delivery system, and a joint transport system in accordance with the merchandise they sell. Almost all chain store operators have already adopted a joint delivery system. They are now stepping up efforts to make delivery more efficient by reducing the number of transport vehicles, etc.

■Targets are set by individual chain store operators.

(9) Japan Franchise Association

Improvement of the fuel efficiency of delivery vehicles (up 1% over the previous year) Introduction of low-emission vehicles (50 new hybrid cars and 18 CNG vehicles in fiscal 2007) Promotion of joint delivery (Reduced fuel consumption by 2.5~5.0% by improving delivery routes) Measurement of the effects of eco-friendly vehicles in tandem with promotion of utilization thereof Guidance on eco-driving, etc.

(10) Japan Department Stores Association

■Industry-wide targets are set. (Target set by industry)

Promotion of efficient transportation in procurement and delivery of merchandise. (Delivery is mostly outsourced.)

iii) Case examples of energy conservation measures

1) Improving distribution efficiency [Report from 31 industries]

＜Case examples＞

Industry Type of measures Actual examples

Concentration of coal centers and use of larger coal transport vessels

・Reduction of 5,600t-CO2/year Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan

Joint delivery through a logistics company established by all group companies

・Reduction of the number of trucks by 2%


Modal shift to ship transport and use of larger tankers and other transportation vehicles

・CO2 emissions per transportation ton-kilometer in FY2006 decreased by about 4.8% for tankers and about 5.4% for bulk trucks, compared to FY2000.

Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association

Joint delivery of products with group/non-group companies

・Energy consumption was reduced by 48% due to the joint delivery of products from different companies to city construction sites (in 2006).


Increasing container loading ratio by adjusting delivery date, etc.

・Loading ratio84.5%→85.0%

83

Fuel consumption decreased due to fewer forklifts following the improvement of distribution efficiency in plants..

・Gasoline5kℓ/／year（Company E）

Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association

Utilization of wheeled platforms

・Electricity 800kwh/year、200ℓ/／year（Company F）

Enhancement of efficiency by reducing the number of delivery vehicles through shared use

・Company A stopped individual delivery of rice and instead began delivering rice via distribution centers to provide consolidated services. As a result, the company abolished all 84 delivery vehicles that had been required for individual delivery of rice.


Shortening distribution channels and curtailing distribution materials by adopting a system to deliver garments on hangers

・Company C is striving to reduce CO2 emissions by increasing the loading ratio through promotion of efficient stowage of cargo on carts. ・ Fiscal 2005 18.5 cases/cart ・ →Fiscal 2006 18.7（improvement by 0.2 case）

Reduction of fuel consumed by delivery vehicles

・Reduced CO2 emissions by 91t-CO2/year by providing guidance to drivers and checking their performance by utilizing operation control systems


Promotion of joint delivery・Reduced CO2 emissions by 670t-CO2/year by promoting

joint distribution of building materials <Industries that submitted reports> Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Petroleum Association of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Paper Association, Japan Cement Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Copper and Brass Association, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Petroleum Development Association, Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, Japan Glass Bottle Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan Foreign Trade Council, Japan LP Gas Association

2) Introduction and diffusion of eco-friendly cars and low-emission vehicles [Report from 15 industries]

＜Case examples＞

Industry Type of introduced vehicles Number of vehicles introduced (example)

Japan Gas Association CNG car About 30,000

(at the end of FY2006)

Japan Franchise Association CNG car, Hybrid car

As of the end of fiscal 2006, 206 CNG cars were in operation. In fiscal 2007, 50 hybrid cars are to be introduced.

Japan LP Gas Association Introduction and switch to LPG cars

Reduced CO2 emissions by 26.9t-CO2 (in fiscal 2006; Company B)

<Industries that submitted reports> Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Japan Machine Tool Builders’ Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan LP Gas Association

84

3) Modal shift [Report from 20 industries] ＜Case examples＞

Type of measures Overview

Changes to transportation methods

・Promotion of modal shift* (Modal shift rate) (1) Japan Iron and Steel Federation 96% (2) Japan Cement Association 90% or more (3) Japan Paper Association 81.3%% (4) Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association 28.6%

* Modal shift: The shift to railway and marine transport in the case where the transport distance is at least 500km. The modal shift rate refers to the percentage of the shift to railway and marine transport.

<Industries that submitted reports> Japan Gas Association, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Paper Association, Japan Cement Association, Four electrical/electronics-related groups, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Japan Mining Industry Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Flat Glass Manufacturers Association of Japan, Japanese Electric Wire & Cable Makers’ Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Japan Petroleum Development Association, Japan Industrial Vehicles Association, Japan Glass Bottle Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Foreign Trade Council

iv) Eco-driving [Report from 20 industries]

Promoting anti-idling practices and proper adjustment of tire air pressure. Installing GPS equipment to promote driving at economical speeds, while establishing an award program for staff drivers. Installing digital tachographs in all large trucks in order to reflect implementation status of energy-saving driving in drivers’ wages.

<Industries that submitted reports> Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan, Japan Gas Association, Japan Iron and Steel Federation, Japan Chemical Industry Association, Japan Auto Parts Industries Association, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association, Lime Manufacture Association, Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association, Japan Aluminium Association, Japan Auto-Body Industries Association, Japan Bearing Industrial Association, Japan Sanitary Equipment Industry Association, Japan Petroleum Development Association, Japan Textile Finishers’ Association, Japan Chain Stores Association, Japan Franchise Association, Japan Department Stores Association, Japan DIY Industry Association, Japan Association of Chain Drug Stores, Japan LP Gas Association

85

v) Contribution to the transport sector through product development [Report from 10 industries]

<Case examples of product development> Industry Developed products Overview

Introduction of biomass fuel ・Started test-marketing bio-gasoline (bio-ETBE) blended

with bioethanol in April 2007

Sulfur-free gasoline and diesel oil

・Sulfur-free (10 ppm S) gasoline and diesel oil drastically increase the fuel economy of automobiles in combination with a new engine and the latest exhaust gas after-treatment system.

(1) Petroleum Association of Japan

Development of fuel-efficient engine oil

・Efforts are being made to develop fuel-efficient engine oil.

(2) Japan Iron and Steel Federation

Manufacturing high-strength steel sheet for use in automobiles

・CO2 emissions were reduced by about 4.95 million tons by using highly-functional steel products manufactured in 1990 through 2006.

(3) Japan Chemical Industry Association

Manufacturing chemical products for use in “Eco-tire”

・Manufacturing the synthetic rubber, silica (filler) and disperser used in Eco-tires with low rolling friction

(4) Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association

Early introduction of cars that meet fuel efficiency standards

・CO2 emissions in the transport sector have been on a decreasing trend thanks to the early introduction of cars meeting fiscal 2010 fuel efficiency standards. (257 million tons in fiscal 2005)

(5) Lime Manufacture Association

Development of highly-reactive calcium hydroxide

・The weight of calcium hydroxide was reduced by 40% compared with the existing products, allowing trucks to transport large amounts of calcium hydroxide efficiently. (Reduction by five truckload of calcium hydroxide)

(6) Japan Rubber Manufacturers Association

Production and marketing of fuel-efficient tire, and development of lighter automobile parts and run flat tire

・Enhancement of automobile fuel efficiency ・Spare tires are going off the market as a result of the

introduction of run flat tires. (CO2 emissions reduction at the stage of production of lighter tires and disposal of old tires)

(7) Japan Aluminium Association

Adoption of aluminum hoods to automobiles

・In the case of adoption of aluminum hoods, the CO2 emissions reductions while the automobile is running (about 760,000 tons. in 2006~2010) is greater than the CO2 emissions reduction in the process of production (about 120,000 tons).

(8) Japan Auto-Body Industries Association

Weight conservation and vehicle enlargement

・Achieved reduction in weight of compact cars, side panel-opening vans, refrigeration vans, and dump trucks (up to300kg per unit)


Enhanced the efficiency of ultra-low torque tapered roller bearings

・Contributed to CO2 reductions lowering rotary torque by 80%, cutting weight by 40%, and enhancing fuel efficiency by about 2%。

(10) Japan Industrial Vehicles Association

Shift from engine forklifts to battery forklifts

・In FY2006, CO2 emissions from forklifts decreased by 10% compared to FY1998.

vi) Other efforts

Promoting voluntary activities for the collection and destruction of chlorofluorocarbon (CFC) used in car air conditioners (Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association)

Working for the establishment of a subsidy system to promote a shift to battery forklifts (Japan Industrial Vehicles Association)

86

Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy

Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Global Environment Committee, Central Environment Council

Membership Roster

[Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] (Total: 39 persons) Chair Yoichi Kaya Director-General, Research Institute of Innovative Technology for the Earth Yumi Akimoto Chief Executive Emeritus, Mitsubishi Materials Corporation Mamoru Akiyama President, Institute of Applied Energy Naohito Asano Professor, Faculty of Law, Fukuoka University Hisashi Ishitani Professor, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University Naoto Oumi Assistant General Secretaries, JTUC-RENGO Hiroko Kakuta Senior Counselor, Housewives’ Association (Shufu. Rengokai) Takao Kashiwagi Professor, Integrated Research Institute, Tokyo Institute of Technology

Professor, Department of Mechanical and Control Engineering, Graduate school of Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology (side job)

Tsunehisa Katsumata Chairman, Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan Takeo Kikkawa Professor, Graduate School of Commerce and Management, Hitotsubashi University Noriko Kimoto Critic and journalist Mitsuo Kono Chairman, Institute of Foreign and Domestic Information Taketo Sakuma Vice President, Kochi University of Technology Fumio Sameshima Co-Chairman, Committee on Environment and Safety, Nippon Keidanren Fumio Shimakawa Vice-President, Japan Society of Industrial Machinery Manufacturers Shoichiro Suzuki Chairman, Japan Paper Association Motoyuki Suzuki Professor, The University of the Air Yasuhisa Chiba Chairman, Technical Affairs Committee, Japan Chemical Industry Association Fujio Cho Chairman, Japan Automobile Manufacturers Association Masahisa Naitoh Chairman & CEO, The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Takeshi Nakai Visiting Professor, Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University Hidetoshi Nakagami President, Jyukankyo Research Institute Junko Nakanishi Director, Research Center for Chemical Risk Management, National Institute of Advanced

Industrial Science and Technology Kazuyuki Nakamura Chairman, The Japan Refrigeration and Air Conditioning Industry Association Shin Nakayama Acting Chairman, The Japan Electrical Manufacturers’ Association Shigefumi Nishio Professor, Institute of Industrial Science, the University of Tokyo Akio Nomura Chairman, The Japan Gas Association Hajime Bada Chairman, The Japan Iron and Steel Federation Toyohiko Hayakawa Professor Emeritus, Tokyo Institute of Technology Shinji Fukukawa Senior Advisor, Global Industrial and Social Progress Research Institute Katsuhiko Machida Chairman, Japan Electronics and Information Technology Institutes Association Masahiro Matsuo NHK news commentator Eizo Matsuda Deputy Chief Editorial Writer, The Yomiuri Shimbun Tokyo Head Office Teruyo Mimura Auditor, Nippon Association of Consumer Specialists Akio Morishima Special Research Advisor, The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies Mitsutsune Yamaguchi Professor, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo Kenji Yamaji Professor, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo

87

Shohei Yonemoto Professor, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo Fumiaki Watari President, Petroleum Association of Japan

[Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Global Environment Committee, Central Environment Council] (Total 14 persons) Chair Tadashi Otsuka Professor, School of Law, Waseda University Naohito Asano Professor, Faculty of Law, Fukuoka University Kohei Urano Professor for Specific Project, Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences,

Yokohama National University Kenji Ogawa Deputy Counselor, Urban and Global Environment Division, Bureau of Environment, Tokyo

Metropolitan Government Etsuo Kobayashi Adviser, Hyogo Environmental Advancement Association Koji Shimada Professor, College of Economics, Ritsumeikan University Motoyuki Suzuki Professor, The Open University of Japan Hidetoshi Nakagami President, Jyukankyo Research Institute Yasuhiro Hirai Associate Professor, Environment Preservation Center, Kyoto University Koichi Fujie Professor, Department of Ecological Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology Toshihiko Masui Leader, Integrated Assessment Modeling Section, Social and Environmental Systems Division,

National Institute for Environmental Studies Shuichi Miura Associate Professor, Department of Architecture and Environmental Design, Tohoku University of

Art and Design Yuichi Moriguchi Director, Research Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management, National Institute for

Environmental Studies Akio Morishima Special Research Advisor, The Institute for Global Environmental Strategies

88

Joint Subcommittee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Industrial Structure Council and Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy

Expert Committee for Follow-up to the Voluntary Action Plan on the Environment, Global Environment Committee, Central Environmental Council

WG Membership Roster

●Resources and Energy WG (Total: ten persons)

[Industrial Structure Council/Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Chair Shigefumi Nishio Professor, Institute of Industrial Science, the University of Tokyo Yoji Inaba Professor, College of Law, Nihon University Mitsuo Kono Chairman, Institute of Foreign and Domestic Information Kazuko Sato Executive Director, Nippon Association of Consumer Specialists Akira Sekiya Principal Research Scientist, Research Institute for Innovation in Sustainable Chemistry, National

Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology Hiroyuki Nagumo President, The Federation of Electric Power Related Industry Worker’s Unions of Japan Eizo Matsuda Editorial Writer, The Yomiuri Shimbun Tokyo Head Office Kenji Yamaji Professor, School of Engineering, The University of Tokyo

[Central Environment Council] Tadashi Otsuka Professor, School of Law, Waseda University Toshihiko Masui Leader, Integrated Assessment Modeling Section, Social and Environmental Systems Division,

National Institute for Environmental Studies

●Iron and Steel WG (Total: seven persons)

[Industrial Structure Council/Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Chair Taketo Sakuma Vice President, Kochi University of Technology Hiroki Kudo Group Manager, Climate Change Policy Group and Director, Global Environment and

Sustainable Development Unit, The Institute of Energy Economics, Japan Ryuji Matsuhashi Professor, the University of Tokyo Kanji Yoshioka Professor, Keio Economic Observatory, Keio University Shohei Yonemoto Professor, Research Center for Advanced Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo

[Central Environment Council] Etsuo Kobayashi Adviser, Hyogo Environmental Advancement Association Yuichi Moriguchi Director, Research Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management, National Institute for

Environmental Studies

89

●Chemicals and Nonferrous Metal WG (Total: seven persons)

[Industrial Structure Council/Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Chair Takeo Kikkawa Professor, Graduate School of Commerce and Management, Hitotsubashi University Hiroko Kakuta Senior Counselor, Housewives’ Association (Shufu. Rengokai) Masaru Kitano Professor, Department of Industrial Chemistry, School of Science and Technology, Meiji

University Tatsuo Sato Professor, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology Atsushi TsuTsumi Associate Professor, Graduate School of Engineering, the University of Tokyo Takashi Nakamura Professor and Director, Research Center for Sustainable Materials Engineering, Institute of

Multidisciplinary Research for Advanced Materials, Tohoku University Toshio Nishi Professor, Graduate School of Science and Engineering, Tokyo Institute of Technology

[Central Environment Council] Kohei Urano Professor for Specific Project, Graduate School of Environment and Information Sciences,

Yokohama National University Yuichi Moriguchi Director, Research Center for Material Cycles and Waste Management, National Institute for

Environmental Studies

●Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG (Total: eight persons)

[Industrial Structure Council/Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Chair Shigefumi Nishio Professor, Institute of Industrial Science, the University of Tokyo Yuki Aomi Advisory specialist for consumers’ affairs Masataka Arai Professor, Faculty of Engineering, Gunma University Mitsuo Kono Chairman, Institute of Foreign and Domestic Information Hidetoshi Nakagami President, Jyukankyo Research Institute Junko Nakanishi Director, Research Center for Chemical Risk Management, National Institute of Advanced

Industrial Science and Technology

[Central Environment Council] Yasuhiro Hirai Associate Professor, Environment Preservation Center, Kyoto University Koichi Fujie Professor, Department of Ecological Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology

●Electronics, Electrical Equipment, and Industrial Machinery WG (Total: eight persons)

[Industrial Structure Council/Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Chair Hisashi Ishitani Professor, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University Mamoru Akiyama President, Institute of Applied Energy Koji Kajimura Vice-President, Japan Society for the Promotion of Machine Industry Hiroko Kakuta Senior Counselor, Housewives’ Association (Shufu. Rengokai) Toshio Goto Executive Superintendent, Chubu University Masahiro Matsuo NHK news commentator

[Central Environment Council] Koji Shimada Professor, College of Economics, Ritsumeikan University Koichi Fujie Professor, Department of Ecological Engineering, Toyohashi University of Technology

90

●Automobile, Auto Parts and Auto Body WG (Total eight persons)

[Industrial Structure Council/Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Chair Hisashi Ishitani Professor, Graduate School of Media and Governance, Keio University Mamoru Akiyama President, Institute of Applied Energy Hiroko Kakuta Senior Counselor, Housewives’ Association (Shufu. Rengokai) Shiro Kurihara Professor, Graduate School of Commerce and Management, Hitotsubashi University Katsuya Nagata Professor, School of Science and Engineering, Waseda University Masahiro Matsuo NHK news commentator

[Central Environment Council] Etsuo Kobayashi Adviser, Hyogo Environmental Advancement Association Koji Shimada Professor, College of Economics, Ritsumeikan University

●Distribution and Service WG (Total: seven persons)

[Industrial Structure Council /Advisory Committee for Natural Resources and Energy] Chair Hidetoshi Nakagami President, Jyukankyo Research Institute Haruko Uchida Consultant, Yuasa Consulting Co.,Ltd. Atsushi Ehara Professor, School of Network and Information, Senshu University Shinya Nakada Professor, Faculty of Economics, Kanagawa University Miyoko Hyodo President, Housewives’ Association (Shufu. Rengokai)

[Central Environment Council] Kenji Ogawa Deputy Counselor, Urban and Global Environment Division, Bureau of Environment, Tokyo

Metropolitan Government Shuichi Miura Associate Professor, Department of Environmental Design, Tohoku University of Art and Design

Documents

Minister of Economy, Trade and Industry - Results and Future … · 2019-02-01 · Resources and Energy WG 2. Paper, Flat Glass and Cement WG 3. Iron and Steel WG 4. ... including