Minnesota Medical Marijauana

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

  • 7/27/2019 Minnesota Medical Marijauana

    1/2

    Bill #: 5887

    Regulating medical cannabis

    Companion bill #: No Companion Bill.

    Summary/AWC comments

    Currently there is no state agency with regulatory oversight of medical cannabis. Health care professionals canrecommend the use of marijuana to his or her patients. These patients who have valid documentation may assertan affirmative defense at trial for various marijuana charges, but do not have arrest protection.

    This bill would seek to regulate medical cannabis through the LIquor Control Board (LCB).The bill establisheslicensing and taxation requirements for medical marijuana and makes other various changes:

    Requires a patient to complete an in-person exam with their medical provider prior to receiving anauthorization for medical marijuana.

    Requires medical marijuana producers, processors, and dispensaries to be licensed by the (LCB). The LCBhas until July 1, 2014, to implement a licensing program. Collective gardens are not required to belicensed.

    Provides arrest protection to owners, employees and members of licensed dispensaries. Providesimmunity from criminal and civil penalties to licensed medical cannabis producers and processors andtheir employees.

  • 7/27/2019 Minnesota Medical Marijauana

    2/2

    Makes minor changes to the collective garden provisions to say that 10 qualifying patients may participatein a single collective garden per day, instead of at any time. The collective garden section also includes aveto provision that says if the Governor vetoes any part of the act, then the collective garden sectiondoesnt take effect.

    Retains language providing cities authority over zoning, land use, business licensing, and health and safetyrequirements. It also retains language that preempts cities from banning medical cannabis dispensaries.This language was included in the law in 2011, but referenced licensed dispensaries, which didnt exist

    because there was no state licensing in place. Imposes a new 20% excise tax on the wholesale sale of medical cannabis to a processor or dispensary. It

    does not include a special excise tax on the retail sale of medical marijuana. The revenue collected willgo to the state general fund.

    There are concerns that it will be difficult for the legal recreational marijuana market created by I-502 tocompete with the unregulated and untaxed medical marijuana market. Some in the medical marijuana industryhave long sought legitimacy through a state licensing process. This bill appears to try to address both of theseissues. However, we are sensitive to the impacts these changes may have on cities.