MISSION M&E PRESENTATION

Jean Claude RandrianarisoaSenior Economist, M&E Officer

USAID/Madagascar

We will have better understanding of

1. USAID Use of M&E Data2. USAID Requirements in terms of

Data3. List of Mission Requested Indicators

A. StructureB. M&E ActivitiesC. FFP Indicators

F STANDARD FRAMEWORK

GOAL

Program Area

Program Element

Program Element

Program Area

Program Area

Cross-Cutting

Indicators

Democracy and GovernanceInvesting in PeopleEconomic Growth

HealthAgricultureInfrastructure

NutritionAgricultural Enabling EnvironmentTransport Services

Mission M&E Activities Involving FFP Projects

Portfolio Review

Annual Report (PPR)

Monitoring

Data Quality Assessments

Evaluations

Portfolio Review

• Goals: How are we doing?• Twice a year (June-July and

December)• Usually use Outcome data for the

discussions (Collected by Third Party e.g OMS)

• Outcomes may affect targets, indicators, program implementation

Portfolio Review

Mission

FSDA/FFP

Activities/Projects + Survey DATA

Annual Performance Report (PPR)

• USAID/Mission role to report on FFP achievement to Washington

• Once a year (Oct - Nov)– Start Data request by mid-October– Report Achievements from

10/01/FYXX to 09/30 FYXX– Revise Targets for FY XX+1/2/3

• Directly linked to the IPTT

Annual Performance Report (PPR)

• Report Achievement, • Explain any Deviation from Targets (+/- 10%)• Non-Cumulative (Often)

• Revise Targets• Provide rationale for Targets• Plan for Target Changes (o/a April)

Monitoring

• Site Visits (ad hoc) including Routine DQA

• Outcome Monitoring Survey for Health (Status of selected indicators by district)

• USAID Performance Indicators Database System

• USAID Data Stewards

Data Quality Assessment

• For F-Indicators in the PPR• At least once every three years• Routine DQA as needed

Evaluations• For Specific Food Security

Evaluations FFP• For evaluation questions related

to other DO:–Coordination between USAID/HPN

USAID/ENV and FSDA

Evaluations (2015-2017)• Performance and Skills of CHWs• Impact of microfinance on

households’ social expenditures/investments

• Compliance to environmental measures

INDICATORS for FFP

INDICATORSMost of them the same as FFP Indicators

– Collected by the two Projects– May have different reporting

requirements– Reported at the Mission level (not

project)

INDICATORS– Shall have the same definition, method

of collect and calculation… – Shall have PIRS

• Definition & Measurement Unit• Data Collection (frequency, POC, costs)• DQA and Limitation• Baseline &Targets

INDICATOR 3.1.9-1

Number of people trained in child health and nutrition through USG-supported programs

• Number of people (health professionals, primary health care workers, community health workers, volunteers, non-health personnel) trained in child health care and child nutrition through USG-supported programs

INDICATOR 3.1.9-15

Number of children under five reached by USG-supported nutrition programs

– Number of children reached by programs that promote good infant and young child feeding and/or growth promotion programs

– Promotion of good infant and young child feeding practices, including breastfeeding, and participation in community based growth monitoring and promotion (GMP), are essential in preventing malnutrition and improving child survival.

INDICATOR 3.1.9.1-3

Prevalence of households with moderate or severe hunger

The HHS is a food deprivation scale that measures the percentage of households experiencing the following three categories of food deprivation:

3.1.8.1-2 and 3.1.8.2-2

3.1.8.1-2 Number of people gaining access to improved drinking water source

3.1.8.2-2 Number of people gaining access to improved sanitation

INDICATOR 3.3.3-9

Number of people benefiting from USG-supported social assistance programming

– Number of people receiving assistance (cash, food, or other in-kind) from programs supported in whole or in part through USG resources.

INDICATOR 4.4.3-7

Number of beneficiaries receiving improved transport services due to USG assistance

– Each grantee will identify the infrastructure that has been supported with USAID funding

– We need to ensure consistency across award– What is the method to estimate the number of

beneficiaries?

INDICATOR 4.4.3-13

Kilometers of roads constructed or repaired with USG assistance

– Length of road constructed or rehabilitated indicates increased access to improved transport for more rapid and sustained economic growth and social development.

INDICATOR 4.5-16

Farmer's gross margin per unit of land (for selected crop)

The gross margin is the difference between the total value of production of the agricultural product (crop, fish) and the cost of producing that item, divided by the total number of units in production (hectares of crops, fish pond area in hectares).

INDICATOR 4.5-17

Farmer's gross margin

per unit of animal

The gross margin is the difference between the total value of production of the agricultural product (milk, eggs, livestock) and the cost of producing that item, divided by the total number of animals in production.

INDICATOR 4.5.1-28

Number of hectares with irrigation and drainage services

This indicator measures the total area of land provided with irrigation and drainage services under the project, including in (i) the area provided with new irrigation and drainage services, and (ii) the area provided with improved irrigation and drainage services, expressed in hectare (ha).

INDICATOR 4.5.2-2

Number of hectares under improved technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance

– This indicator measures the area (in hectares) of land or water (for fisheries) first brought under new technology during the current reporting year. Any technology that was first adopted in a previous reporting year should be marked as “Continuing”. Technologies to be counted here are agriculture-related technologies.

– Relevant technologies include mechanical and physical; biological; chemical; management and cultural practices

– Double Counting Issues

INDICATOR 4.5.2-5

Number of farmers and others who have applied new technologies or management practices as a result of USG assistance

This indicator measures the total number of farmers, ranchers and other primary sector producers, individual processors (not firms), rural entrepreneurs, managers and traders, natural resource managers, etc. that applied new technologies anywhere within the food and fiber system as a result of USG assistance.

INDICATOR 4.5.2-7

Number of individuals who have received USG supported short term agricultural sector productivity or food security training

– This includes farmers, ranchers, fishers, and other primary sector producers who receive training in a variety of best practices in productivity, post-harvest management, linking to markets, etc.

This should include training on food security, water resources management, sustainable agriculture, and climate change resilience, but should not include nutrition-related trainings, which should be reported under indicator #3.1.9-1 instead.

INDICATOR 4.5.2-13

Number of rural households benefiting directly from USG interventions

– A household is a beneficiary if it contains at least one individual who is a beneficiary. An individual is a beneficiary if s/he is engaged with a project activity or s/he comes into direct contact with the set of interventions (goods or services) provided by the project. Individuals merely contacted or involved in an activity through brief attendance (non-recurring participation) does not count as a beneficiary.

INDICATOR 4.7.1-12Total number of clients (households and/or microenterprises) benefiting from financial services provided through USG-assisted financial intermediaries, including non-financial institutions or actors

» The total number of borrowers, savers, and clients of other financial services such as micro credit and savings served by the USG-assisted intermediaries

INDICATOR 4.7.1-13

Number of financial intermediaries supported by USG assistance

– Number of financial intermediaries supported by USG assistance serving poor households and microenterprises, including non-financial institutions or actors.

GNDR2Percentage of female participants in USG-assisted programs designed to increase access to productive economic resources (assets, credit, income or employment)

– Productive economic resources include: assets - land, housing, businesses, livestock or financial assets such as savings; credit; wage or self-employment; and income.

GNDR4

Percentage of participants reporting increased agreement with the concept that males and females should have equal access to social, economic, and political opportunities.)

– This indicator will be used to gauge the effectiveness of USG efforts to promote gender equality by measuring changes in participants’ attitudes about whether men and women should have equal opportunities in social, political, and economic spheres.

Outcome and Impact Indicators

1. Prevalence of underweight children under 5

2. Prevalence of stunted children under 5 years of age

3. Exclusive breastfeeding

4. Prevalence of Poverty: Percent of people living on less than $1.25/day

5. Per capita expenditures (as a proxy for income) of USG‐targeted beneficiaries

6. WASH Indicators in terms of Percentage