Dr. Timothy S. BrophyDirector of Institutional Assessment

University of FloridaGainesville, FL

MISSION POSSIBLE: ASSESSING

GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL

PROGRAMS

Part 1: To introduce, describe, and explain the basic elements of student learning outcomes and program goals, their development, and measurement

Part 2: To share a structure for assessment planning and reporting for graduate and professional programs and review an example

Part 3: Review and discuss graduate sample academic assessment data reports

TODAY’S GOALS

Size and scope• Multiple colleges/units• Undergraduate, graduate, professional, and certificate programs

Institutional consistency• Outcomes• Assessment reporting• Cycles

Institutional CultureManagement and ToolsHonoring unit autonomy, disciplinary distinctions, and institutional requirementsFaculty comportment

COMMON CHALLENGES

An educational program is a coherent set of courses leading to a credential (degree, diploma, or certificate) awarded by the institution. (SACSCOC, 2011)

HOW ACCREDITORS DEFINE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS

There is a clear expectation that an institution be able to demonstrate institutional effectiveness for all its diplomas, certificates, and undergraduate and graduate educational degree programs.The expectation is that the institution will engage in ongoing planning and assessment to ensure that for each academic program, the institution develops and assesses student learning outcomes.

Program and learning outcomes specify the knowledge, skills, values, and attitudes students are expected to attain in courses or in a program.

EXPECTATIONS FOR ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT FOR ACCREDITATION

Methods for assessing the extent to which students achieve these outcomes are appropriate to the nature of the discipline, and consistent over time to enable the institution to evaluate cohorts of students who complete courses or a program. Shared widely within and across programs, the results of this assessment can affirm the institution’s success at achieving its mission and can be used to inform decisions about curricular and programmatic revisions.

At appropriate intervals, program and learning outcomes and assessment methods are evaluated and revised.

EXPECTATIONS FOR ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT

PART 1: STUDENT LEARNING

OUTCOMES, PROGRAM GOALS,

AND OUTPUTS

Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) are defined generally as “what students are expected to know and be able to do by completion of their degree program”Define this for your faculty and ensure that this definition is consistent across campus and clearly posted

DEFINE AND DISSEMINATE THE TERMS

Undergraduate

Content Knowledge

Critical thinking

Communication

Graduate

Content Knowledge

Professional Behavior Skills

CONSIDER A CATEGORICAL ORGANIZING FRAMEWORK FOR

SLOS

Student Learning Outcomes reflect the curriculum the discipline, and faculty

expectations; as these elements evolve, learning outcomes change.

Recency has to do with the degree to which the outcome reflects current

knowledge and practice in the discipline.Relevance is the degree to which the

outcome relates logically and significantly to the discipline and the degree. Rigor has to do with the degree of

academic precision and thoroughness that the outcome requires to be met

successfully.

THEE CHARACTERISTICS OF SLOS:

RECENCY, RELEVANCE, AND RIGOR

Outputs describe and count what we do and whom we reach, and represent products or services we produce. Processes deliver outputs; what is produced at the end of a process is an output.

An outcome is a level of performance or achievement. It may be associated with a process or its output. Outcomes imply measurement - quantification - of performance.

DISTINGUISH OUTPUTS FROM OUTCOMES

We seek to measure outcomes as well as their associated outputs; however, SLOs focus on outcomes.

For example, while we produce a number of new graduates (the output), it is critical that we have a measure of the quality of the graduates as defined by the college or discipline (the outcome).

Outcomes describe, in measurable terms, these quality characteristics by defining our expectations for students.

OUTCOMES AND OUTPUTS: WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?

EXERCISE 1: ARE THESE RESULTS

STATEMENTS OUTPUTS OR OUTCOMES?

OUR PROGRAM GRADUATED 25 STUDENTS IN SPRING 2013.

A. OutputB. Outcome

Output

Outcome

0%0%

75% OF OUR STUDENTS ACHIEVED LEVEL 4 (OUT OF 5) ON OUR PRESENTATION ASSESSMENT RUBRIC.

A. OutputB. Outcome

Output

Outcome

0%0%

WE RECRUITED 10 ADDITIONAL STUDENTS IN 2013-14.

A.OutputB.Outcome

Output

Outcome

0%0%

IN 2013, OUR DOCTORAL STUDENTS PUBLISHED 10 PAPERS IN THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PSYCHOLOGY .

A. OutputB. Outcome

Output

Outcome

0%0%

Student Learning Outcomes (SLOs) describe what students should know and be able to do as a result of completing an academic program.

Program faculty set targets for their SLOs

Program Goals describe the unit’s expectations for programmatic elements, such as admission criteria, acceptance and graduation rates, etc.

DISTINGUISH SLOS AND PROGRAM GOALS

EXERCISE 2: STUDENT LEARNING

OUTCOMES OR PROGRAM GOALS?

WE WILL LOWER OUR ATTRITION RATE TO 10%.

A. Program GoalB. Student

Learning Outcome

Program Goal

Student Learning O

utcome

0%0%

MUSIC EDUCATION STUDENTS DISCRIMINATE MUSICAL QUALITY BASED ON SOUND MUSICAL REASONING.

A. Program GoalB. Student

Learning Outcome

Program Goal

Student Learning O

utcome

0%0%

WE WILL REDUCE THE AVERAGE TIME TO DEGREE IN OUR GRADUATE PROGRAM FROM THE 2012-13 RATE OF 6.5 YEARS TO 5 YEARS IN 2014-15.

A. Program GoalB. Student

Learning Outcome

Program Goal

Student Learning O

utcome

0%0%

STUDENTS ANALYZE EXPERIMENTAL DATA AND INTERPRET RESULTS IN THE CELLULAR AND MOLECULAR SCIENCES.

A. Program GoalB. Student

Learning Outcome

Program Goal

Student Learning O

utcome

0%0%

EFFECTIVE SLOS:Focus on what students will know and be able to do.

All disciplines have a body of core knowledge that students must learn to be successful as well as a core set of applications of that knowledge in professional settings.

Describe observable and measurable actions or behaviors. Effective SLOs present a core set of observable, measureable

behaviors. Measurement tools vary from exams to complex tasks graded by rubrics.

The key to measurability: an active verb that describes a observable behavior, process, or product

A framework for developing SLOs: Bloom’s Taxonomy

ENSURE THE OUTCOME IS MEASURABLE

• An internal process that is indicated by demonstrated behaviors – OK for learning goals but not recommended for program or course SLOs

Understand

• Internal processes that are indicated by demonstrated behaviors closely tied to personal choice or preference; OK if the appreciation or valuing is supported by discipline-specific knowledge

Appreciate; value

• Focuses assessment on “becoming familiar,” not familiarity

Become familiar with

• Not observable; demonstrable through communication or other demonstration of learning

Learn about, think about

• Focuses assessment on becoming and/or gaining – not actual awareness

Become aware of, gain an awareness of

• Focuses assessment on ability, not achievement or demonstration of a skill

Demonstrate the ability to

VERBS AND PHRASES THAT COMPLICATE MEASURABILITY

This model connects course-level and program-level SLOs directly to the program learning goals

Course-level Student Learning Outcome these are determined by the faculty and specify course-level, observable products or

demonstrations

Program-level – Student Learning Outcomethese describe what students will do to demonstrate they have met the learning

goals

Program Learning Goal Level – programs establish learning goals for the degree these goals require multiple actions over time to measure

DEVELOPING MEASURABLE SLOS: A THREE-LEVEL MODEL (CARRIVEAU,

2010)

EXERCISE 3: ARE THE FOLLOWING

OUTCOME STATEMENTS

MEASURABLE?

STUDENTS UNDERSTAND GOOD WRITING STYLE.

A. YesB. No

Yes No

0%0%

STUDENTS SIGHT-SING A 16-MEASURE MELODY WITH NO ERRORS.

A. YesB. No

Yes No

0%0%

STUDENTS EXPLORE AND LEARN ABOUT GEOLOGICAL FORMATIONS.

A. YesB. No

Yes No

0%0%

STUDENTS DEFINE THE ETHICAL RESPONSIBILITIES OF BUSINESS ORGANIZATIONS AND IDENTIFY RELEVANT ETHICAL ISSUES.

A. YesB. No

Yes No

0%0%

Direct assessments of student learning are those that provide for direct examination or observation of student knowledge or skills against measurable performance indicators.

Indirect assessments are those that ascertain the opinion or self-report of the extent or value of learning experiences (Rogers, 2011)

BALANCE DIRECT AND INDIRECT ASSESSMENTS

EXERCISE 4: DIRECT OR INDIRECT

ASSESSMENTS?

COURSE FINAL EXAM

A. DirectB. Indirect

Direct

Indirect

0%0%

SERU OR NSSE SURVEY DATA.

A. DirectB. Indirect

Direct

Indirect

0%0%

FINAL PAPER, PERFORMANCE, OR PRESENTATION GRADED BY A FACULTY DEVELOPED RUBRIC.

A. DirectB. Indirect

Direct

Indirect

0%0%

SENIOR EXIT INTERVIEW.

A. DirectB. Indirect

Direct

Indirect

0%0%

PART 2: PLANNING AND REPORTING

Academic Assessment Plans provide a common framework for units to plan how they assess and measure student achievement of the SLOs Plans also present the process for how the data from these assessments are used to enhance the quality of student learning

ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PLANNING

Provides faculty a focal point for the discussion of the assessment of student learning in the degree programs.

Planning discussions provide an opportunity to revisit the curriculum and its relationship to the SLOs.

Provides a consistent reference resource when faculty and leadership change.

WHY PLAN?

Graduate /Professio

nal program

Assessment Plan

Mission Alignment

Student

Learning

Outcomes

Research

Assessment Timeline

Assessment Cycle

Methods and

Procedures

Assessment Oversight

GRADUATE AND PROFESSIONAL PROGRAM ASSESSMENT PLAN

Call issued by the Office of Institutional Assessment

SACS coordinators collect and

review plans

Plans are submitted to

the online approval system

Director of Institutional Assessment

reviews plans

Approved plans go to the Academic

Assessment Committee

(AAC)

Plans approved by the AAC go

to the University Curriculum Committee

(UCC)

UCC approves plans and

forwards to the Student

Academic Support System

or Graduate School

These are uploaded to the

catalog

ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT PLAN APPROVAL PROCESS

Template: Figure 4 – pp. 3-4 in your handoutRubric: Figure 1, p. 2

SECTIONS OF THE PLAN

Describe briefly the program’s mission, and how the program meets the department, college, and university missions. For example:

The mission of the<enter name> program is to <enter text>. This aligns with the department mission by <enter text.> It also supports the college mission to <enter text>. It supports the university mission by <enter text>.

MISSION

The complete file of graduate and professional program SLOs is on the Institutional Assessment website – http://assessment.aa.ufl.edu

UF’s Graduate SLO categories are Content, Skills, and Professional Behaviors

Online resources at the UF Institutional Assessment website:

“Writing Measurable Student Learning Outcomes” PowerPoint

“Guide to Writing Student Learning Outcomes”

STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

What are the research expectations for students in your program?

Briefly describe the research expectations for students in the degree program.

How does your program prepare the students to become researchers in the discipline?

If the degree is NOT a research degree, briefly state this, and include a brief description of any research-related activities that students complete in the program.

RESEARCH

The Assessment Timeline is a matrix that shows when the SLOs assessed and measured in the program

It should be clear to a student when an assessment occurs, and the type of assessment that is planned (assignment, project, paper, performance, presentation, etc.)

ASSESSMENT TIMELINE

Assessment  SLOs

Assessment 1

Assessment 2

Assessment 3

Enter more as needed

Content Knowledge        

#1        

#2        

Skills        

#3        

#4        Professional Behavior        

#5        

#6        

ASSESSMENT TIMELINEProgram_____________________________________ College ____________________________________

The Assessment Cycle is a matrix that graphically organizes the frequency of SLO assessment

The Assessment Cycle is a multi-year process that is completed in three years

It should be clear to a student when an assessment occurs, and the type of assessment that is planned (assignment, project, paper, performance, presentation, etc.)

ASSESSMENT CYCLE

YearSLOs

11-12 12-13 13-14 14-15 15-16

Content Knowledge          #1          #2          

Critical Thinking (Undergrad)Skills (Grad/Prof)

         

#3          #4          

Communication (Undergrad)Professional Behavior (Grad/Prof)

         

#5          #6          

ASSESSMENT CYCLEProgram College _Analysis and Interpretation: [Enter date or time frame here]Improvement Actions: Completed by [Enter date here]Dissemination: Completed by [Enter date here]

Each unit employs various methods and procedures to assess and collect data on student learning.

In this section of the plan, units provide information on their specific methods and procedures for the SLO assessments they identify in Assessment Timelines.

They must include a sample grading rubric.

It’s OK to sample the total student population – see the recommended sample size chart on the Institutional Assessment website

METHODS AND PROCEDURES

These are the

individuals who are

responsible for

managing the

assessment work in

your unit

List everyone and their contact

information

The first person on

the list should be the lead contact

Purpose: ongoing

communication

ASSESSMENT OVERSIGHT

DEVELOP A SYSTEM OR CYCLE OF PLANNING AND REPORTING

Sp

ring

A

ssessmen

t P

lans

sub

mitted

for th

e next

AY

Fall Assessment Data, results,

and use of results for

previous AY reported

Planning Reporting

Establish Mission,

Goals, and Outcomes

Assessment Planning

Implement the Plan

and Gather Data

Interpret and

Evaluate the Data

Modify and Improve

The review of Academic Assessment Plans is a constructive exercise designed to guide faculty to consider their assessment work thoughtfully.The 2012-13 PhD in English Academic Assessment Plan is on pp. 8-11 of your handout. Using the rubric on p. 2, discuss in your group the degree to which this plan meets the guidelines.

Does the plan meet or not meet the criteria?

What comments would you provide?

ASSESSMENT PLANNING EXERCISE: PHD IN ENGLISH

REPORTING ASSESSMENT RESULTS – STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES

(P. 5)Assessment Method:• List the assignment, exam, project, etc.• If this is a sample, describe the sampling procedure used

Results:• Enter the criterion for success. The “criterion for success” is the minimum

percentage of students who pass the assessment that you consider to be acceptable for your program. If the criterion is less than 70%, provide a rationale.

• State: “X number of students passed the assessment out of a total of Y students, for a percentage of Z%”.

• State: This meets/does not meet the criterion for success.• Attach the data you shared with your faculty (student names redacted). Use of Results:• State who reviewed the results.• Refer to the results that were reviewed.• State actions taken in past tense. For example:

• “Based on our review, we decided to…”• “We modified our SLO #1 because the data indicated that…”• “We changed the course content for ABCXXXX effective fall 20XX because

the data revealed that…”

REPORTING ASSESSMENT RESULTS – ACADEMIC PROGRAM GOALS

Assessment Method:• State the measurement method

Results:• Briefly state your results• Include or attach the data you collected in summary formUse of Results:• State who reviewed the results.• Refer to the results that were reviewed.• State actions taken in past tense. For example:

• “Based on our review, we decided to…”• “Our results led us to modify our goal to…”• “We developed a new measure for this long term goal

based on our review…”

DEVELOP A QUALITY ASSURANCE

PROCESS

Multi-step, institutional review and

approval process

Templates and rubrics for guiding

faculty through the process

Review and evaluate faculty

submissions

Cross-reference plans with data

reported annually

Develop and provide

professional development

Model the process: Modify

and improve quality assurance processes based on the data you

collect

ELEMENTS OF QUALITY ASSURANCE

2012-13 ACADEMIC ASSESSMENT DATA REPORTING REVIEW RESULTSIn early 2014 all of the 2012-13 graduate and professional academic assessment data reports were reviewed.76% were returned for revisions due to failure to follow our guidelinesThe most requested revision was in the Use of Results field. Specifically, programs did not state who reviewed the results. Programs were most likely cited for Program Goal Use of Results statements.Many programs were cited for not stating results and use of results in the past tense

PART 3: EXAMPLES

The 2011-12 Data Analysis Report for the PhD in English is on pp. 6-7 of your handout (Figures 7 and 8).

The 2012-13 Data Analysis Report for this program is on pp. 12-13 of your handout (Figure 10). This report is based on the 2012-13 AAP you have just reviewed. Compare the two data reports. What differences and similarities do you find? Using the Data Entry Guides for Faculty in Figure 5 (p. 5 in your handout) , discuss the degree to which the 2012-13 data report complies with these guidelines. Note: the guidelines were provided beginning with the 2012-13 report; the 2011-12 report was completed without these guidelines.

DATA REPORTING REVIEW EXERCISE – PHD IN ENGLISH

We will review Figure 11 together, on pp. 14-16 of your handout

OTHER EXAMPLES OF DATA REPORTS

1. Define the terms and disseminate them2. Consider an institutional categorical

organizing framework for SLOs3. Recency, Relevance, and Rigor4. Distinguish Outputs from Outcomes 5. Distinguish SLOs from Program Goals6. Ensure the outcome is measurable7. Balance direct and indirect assessments8. Planning Timeline/Cycle9. Templates and Rubrics10.Approval and Management Process11.A system or cycle of planning and

reporting12.Quality Assurance Process

A SUMMARY

Timothy S. Brophy, Ph.D.Director, Institutional Assessment

235 Tigert HallOffice of the Provost

Email: tbrophy@aa.ufl.eduPhone: 352-273-4476

QUESTIONS