76
Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011 Individual Subsystem Testing Report

Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

  • Upload
    moesha

  • View
    47

  • Download
    0

Embed Size (px)

DESCRIPTION

Individual Subsystem Testing Report. Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011. Outline of Presentation. Mission Overview. Functional Block Diagrams. Changes from CDR. Project Management and Team Updates. Subsystem Overview. Lessons Learned. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Citation preview

Page 1: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering Mitchell Community CollegeFebruary 13, 2011

Individual Subsystem Testing

Report

Page 2: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mission OverviewMission Overview

Functional Block DiagramsFunctional Block Diagrams

Changes from CDRChanges from CDR

Project Management and Team UpdatesProject Management and Team Updates

Subsystem OverviewSubsystem Overview

Outline of Presentation Outline of Presentation

Lessons LearnedLessons Learned

ConclusionsConclusions

Page 3: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mission OverviewNathan Keller

Page 4: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mission OverviewMission OverviewGoal Statement:

Our goal is to design and implement various transducers to

passively collect energy for possible use for space based

instrumentation. We expect to harvest energy from the flight

of the rocket, solar and magnetic sources.

Page 5: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mission OverviewMission Overview

Mission Requirements: For each transducer, voltage across a known resistor will

be measured and data will be stored.

○ Some transducers may require amplification of voltage.

The power used by a customized-in-house (CIH) sensing

package will be measured and stored.

Measurable data from the CIH sensing package will be

saved.

Page 6: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Expected ResultsExpected Results

Page 7: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Subsystem Overview- Block Subsystem Overview- Block DiagramDiagram

ArduinoMicrocontroller

Bristol

EMPendulum

DivingBoard

GrowHot

Crusher

Aubade

Elvis

Jerk

Openlog

CIH SensingBoard

7.2VBattery

OpenlogPower on fromWallops

Legend:

----- Power----- Data

----- Serial Data

Op Amp

Resistor

Page 8: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Subsystem Overview- Block Subsystem Overview- Block Diagram Diagram The signal from each transducer will travel through an op amp(if

necessary) and then a resistor of a known value.

The signal will then input into the Arduino where the voltage will be measured.

Upon receiving power-on from Wallops, the Arduino will begin tracking the time from power on to a predetermined stopping time.

The Arduino will also send a digital signal to the CIH board to bring it out of its idle state.

Both the Arduino and CIH sensing package will store data to an OpenLog data logger.

Page 9: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Changes from CDRMechanical

Gary Staggers

Page 10: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Makrolon Plates & standoffs:

○ Increased the thickness of the plates.

Originally planned to use 1/8” plates, but modified to use 3/16” for added

strength.

○ 5/16” Aluminum Hex standoffs tapped to 8-32 have replaced

the original cylindrical standoffs.

 

Page 11: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

Jerk

Changed tube ID from 3/4” to 5/8”.

Magnet size updated from 3/4” to 5/8”.

Changed springs from stainless steel to copper beryllium.

Changes were made to reduce weight, after testing reveals

the smaller size is just as effective.

Page 12: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

EM Pendulum

Magnet lengthened to a 1 inch overall length mounted in

a ball joint mechanism.

Bowl design has been modified to 4 coils perpendicular to

the aluminum cylindrical base.

These changes were implemented because the original

design was not effective in producing voltage.

Page 13: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

Bristol

Construction altered from aluminum to ABS plastic.

Magnet is a spherical 5/8” neodymium magnet.

These changes were implemented to accommodate the 3-D

printer at the college.

Page 14: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

Aubade

Dimensions have been adjusted to fit comfortably on the

second shelf facing the optical port.

Page 15: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

Crusher

Crusher has been downsized since CDR, due to

considerations of weight, cost and space. 

Originally Crusher was designed to be 1” x 1” x 1.5”, and

the current design is 2” x 2” x 0.2”.  This reduced volume

from 1.5 cubic inches to 0.8 cubic inches, which results in

a proportional decrease in weight and cost of production.

Page 16: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

Elvis

Still in development.

Current condenser needs further testing to prove its

viability for the project.

Page 17: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

Diving Board

The cantilever has been changed from aluminum to

Lexan.

Tensile yield strength of Lexan is higher than 6061

aluminum.

Maximum yield strength of Lexan is 65.8 Mpa, 9543 PSI.

Maximum yield strength of 6061 Aluminum is 55.2 Mpa,

8007 PSI.

Page 18: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Mechanical Changes Mechanical Changes

Transducer Changes:

Grow Hot

No changes since CDR.

Page 19: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Changes from CDRElectrical/Software

Dylan Stobbe

Page 20: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Electrical Changes Electrical Changes

The I2C (inter-integrated circuit), the main protocol for

communications between the two microcontrollers, is no

longer necessary.

The second Arduino Microcontroller has been removed.

The main Arduino will control the power to the CIH

sensing board.

Further testing needs to be done to see which

transducers need rectification; Crusher, Aubade, Elvis

and GrowHot do not need rectification.

Page 21: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Electrical Changes Electrical Changes Sensing Package:

The scope of the project has been broadened somewhat

by the switch from an OTS sensing package to a CIH

option.

The CIH package will represent the power consumption

of a comparable.

In addition to serving as a power comparison, the sensing

board will provide useful data regarding the flight profile of

the rocket.

Page 22: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Changes from CDRTest

Erin Wilson

Page 23: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Test Changes Test Changes

No changes since CDR

Page 24: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Changes from CDRSafetyErin Wilson

Page 25: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Safety Updates Safety Updates

Safety presentation given followed by a written test.

All students passed with an 80% or better.

Page 26: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Project Management Update

Beau Brinkley

Page 27: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Team PhotoTeam Photo

Back Row (left to right): Brad, Dylan, Colin, Tony, Joseph, JohnFront Row (left to right): Doug Knight, Gary, Erin, Michael, Nathan, Clint Halsted

Page 28: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Project ManagementProject Management

Organizational Chart

Dr. DougKnight

Gary StaggersMechanicalManager

Erin WilsonSafety Officer

Beau BrinkleyProject Manager

Dylan StobbeElectrical Manager/

Director ofCommunications and

Translation

JohnBenfield

Test Lead

BradHager

MichaelBrown

JosephEdwards

TonyBriceno

CorbinTwitchell

Nathan'Krinkle'Keller

ColinRobinson

Clint Halsted

Page 29: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Project ManagementProject Management

Schedule Update Currently on schedule with only a few internal work task changes.

Some of the test components arrived behind schedule therefore,

manufacturing plan detail revisions have been affected.

In effort to meet schedule demands, Test data will be implemented directly

into design revisions rather than formally revising the manufacturing plan.

Page 30: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Subsystem OverviewBrad Hager

Page 31: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

SubsystemsSubsystems Jerk

EM Pendulum

Bristol

Aubade

Elvis

Diving Board

Grow Hot

Sensing Board

Page 32: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

JerkJerk

Winding wire around Jerk.

Brad

Jerk

Lathe

Winding the Wire

Page 33: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

JerkJerk

Colin

Turning an End Cap

Page 34: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

JerkJerk

Page 35: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

JerkJerk

Status:

Prototype completed and flight tested.

Based on flight results, design will be updated to maximize

potential output.

Page 36: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

EM Pendulum EM Pendulum

Page 37: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

EM PendulumEM Pendulum

Status:

Prototyping dependent on delivery of final materials.

Page 38: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

BristolBristol

Threaded Rods

Housing

Magnet

Enameled Copper Wire 30 AWG

Page 39: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

BristolBristol

Page 40: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

BristolBristol

Status:

Prototype is fully assembled.

Ready for a prototyping rocket flight with fully functional fin

tabs that will simulate rotation.

Page 41: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

AubadeAubade

Page 42: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

AubadeAubade

Status:

During the test flight in broad daylight, 6.70 V were

achieved.

The solar cells are mounted in Lexan sheet.

Page 43: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

CrusherCrusher

Page 44: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

CrusherCrusher

Status:

Testing will be completed this week.

Prototype is complete.

Page 45: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

ElvisElvis

Page 46: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

ElvisElvis

Status:

Testing to be completed.

Changes are anticipated moving forward but test results will

dictate route taken.

Biasing of the condenser mic may not follow our pathway of

passive energy harvesting.

Page 47: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Diving BoardDiving Board

Gary

Milling Diving Board Pieces

Page 48: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Diving BoardDiving Board

Page 49: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Diving BoardDiving Board

Page 50: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Diving Board Test Diving Board Test ResultsResults

Page 51: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Grow HotGrow Hot

Page 52: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Grow HotGrow Hot

Status:

Off the shelf, thermoelectric cooler.

Bench testing started.

Page 53: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Plan for Subsystem Plan for Subsystem IntegrationIntegration

Page 54: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Plan for Subsystem Plan for Subsystem IntegrationIntegration

Page 55: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Plan for Subsystem Plan for Subsystem IntegrationIntegration Make and finalize the physical layout of all transducers.

Place transducers on Makrolon plates and conform to center of

gravity specs.

Optimize wiring layout and pathways.

Change transducer placement as needed within the center of

gravity constraints and New Jersey’s center of gravity

requirements.

Page 56: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Sensing Board Preliminary Sensing Board Preliminary LayoutsLayouts

Bottom of Sensing Board Top of Sensing Board

Page 57: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Sensing Board Preliminary Sensing Board Preliminary LayoutsLayouts

Page 58: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Test RocketJoseph Edwards

Page 59: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Prototyping Test Rocket Prototyping Test Rocket

Joseph, Clint Halsted, Colin, Doug Knight, Tony, Corbin, Gary, Dylan

Page 60: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Construction of Payload Construction of Payload

Joseph

Corbin & Dylan

Dylan

Prelaunch: Rocket assembled in physics lab.

Page 61: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Completed Rocket Completed Rocket

Page 62: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Launch DayLaunch Day

Weather: cloudy, mist

Temp- 43 degrees F

Date:Feb. 10th 2:50 pm- arrived at launch site

Page 63: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Launch Launch

Corbin, Colin, Clint Halsted

Gary, Doug Knight, Colin, Joseph

Jerk

• Weighed Rocket.

• Began prepping rocket, motor, and nosecone.

• Turned payload on and started timer for payload exit program. T- 24 minutes to datalogging.

Page 64: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Launch Launch

Jerk

• Rocket taken apart to ensure correct packing of parachute.

• The rocket is angled slightly into the wind to correct trajectory.

• Ematch inserted into motor.

• Group backs up 100 feet from launch pad.

Page 65: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Launch Launch

Gary & Dylan Recording Flight Data

Recovery

Page 66: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Rocket Launch Test 1Rocket Launch Test 1

Update

4-inch test rocket launched on 02-10-12.

All systems tested (Jerk transducer, data logger and

microcontroller) functioned and contributed to a successful

launch.

Page 67: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Launch ResultsLaunch Results• A snapshot of the output from the first rocket testing of jerk.

• The time (in milliseconds), the integer values of each transducer, the time (in minutes and seconds), and the values in terms of voltage can be seen.

• The graph shows the transduced voltage vs. time.

Time

Vol

ts

Page 68: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

SoftwareSoftwareProgram ran on the first flight of thePrototyping Rocket on 2-10-12

Page 69: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

SoftwareSoftware

Update

While some previous versions of the software have been more

functional, some iterations have been buggy and produced

unpredictable results.

It was necessary to ensure the reliability of the software for the

test rocket and therefore a simpler version of the planned

software was produced.

Page 70: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Lessons LearnedDylan Stobbe

Page 71: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedMechanical

• Always have multiple lines of communication within the group.

• The first try will not produce the precise and polished result needed, so planning for several trials with each project is the best route.

• Quality is better than quantity.

• Always ask questions when unsure and seek out those who are experts on the topic.

Page 72: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedElectrical/Software

It is more important to have a functional program than a

fancy one.

If you need it to work, stick to the basics.

What works on the ground isn’t necessarily true during

flight.

Cable management is key.

Page 73: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedTest

• Always expect something to go wrong, so always allow more time than needed to make changes.

• Plan ahead with check lists and weather conditions before all test flights.

• Use modular designs and Autodesk software to improve the payload.

• Multiple techniques and Autodesk software are needed to create an accurate mass budget of the payload.

Page 74: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Lessons LearnedLessons LearnedTest

Original Payload Payload Revision

Page 75: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

ConclusionsNathan Keller

Page 76: Mitchell Aerospace and Engineering  Mitchell Community College February 13, 2011

Conclusion Conclusion

• All transducers have been designed; they are in the testing phase except for EM Pendulum.

• Programs have been tested and proved flight worthy and reliable.

• CIH sensing board is on schedule and viable.

• Mass requirements are proving not to be an issue.

• Project is currently on schedule.

• No foreseeable roadblocks in the future.