Upload
audrey-salinas
View
37
Download
0
Tags:
Embed Size (px)
DESCRIPTION
Moanalua Middle School Challenge. Common Core Assessments will begin in SY 2014-2015. Common Core Assessments. Two consortiums are each developing their version of national tests. Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers http://parcconline.org - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Citation preview
Moanalua Middle School Challenge
Common Core Assessments will begin in SY 2014-2015
Common Core Assessments
Two consortiums are each developing their version of national tests.
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
http://parcconline.org
SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium
www.k12.wa.us/SMARTER
Hawaii belongs to and is a voting member of SMARTER Balanced.
• At the Hawaii Model Schools Conference, a member of the SMARTER Balanced consortium came to speak about the tests.
Susan GendronSenior Fellow,International Center for Ed.
LeadershipPolicy Coordinator, SMARTER
Assessment System Design: Distributed Summative Assessment
4
START OF SCHOOL
YEAR
END OF
SCHOOL YEARThrough-
Course 1
Through-Course 2
25% 50%
Through-Course 3
75%
Through-Course 4
90%
End-Of-Year
Source: Graphic adapted from a representation prepared by the Center for K-12 Assessment & Performance Management (www.k12center.org)
Key components:
Three through-course components distributed throughout the year in ELA and mathematics, grades 3-11.
One Speaking/Listening assessment administered after students complete the third through course component in ELA; required but not part of summative score – could be used for course grades.
One end-of-year assessment
AYP
• Through-Course assessments will not count towards school AYP.
• End-of-the-year assessments will determine AYP.
Sample End-of-the-Year Performance Assessment for 11th Grade
• Students will have about two weeks.• Tests will be proctored by teachers in school.• Extended time available.• Research portion is meant to be collaborative.• Students will need access to the internet.
Writing
• Content and Form will be assessed.• Students should have the fluency to write
around 1,000 words in 7th/8th grades.• The following is an example of what 8th
graders should be able to write.
College and Career Readiness Writing Standards
Text Types and Purposes1. Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive
topics or texts, using valid reasoning and relevant and sufficient evidence.
2. Write informative/explanatory texts to examine and convey complex ideas and information clearly and accurately through the effective selection, organization, and analysis of content.
3. Write narratives to develop real or imagined experiences or events using effective techniques, well-chosen details, and well-structured event sequences.
College and Career Readiness Writing Standards
Production and Distribution of Writing4. Produce clear and coherent writing in which the
development, organization, and style are appropriate to task, purpose, and audience.
5. Develop and strengthen writing as needed by planning, revising, editing, rewriting, or trying a new approach.
6. Use technology, including the Internet, to produce and publish writing and to interact and collaborate with others.
College and Career Readiness Writing Standards
Research to Build and Present Knowledge7. Conduct short, as well as more sustained research projects
based on questions, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.
8. Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, assess the credibility and accuracy of each source, and integrate the information while avoiding plagiarism.
9. Draw evidence from literary or informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research.
Example/ Science Technical
• Sample Task A: Evaluating Evidence• Compare what the latest science tells us about Genetically Modified
food against the arguments for and against Genetically Modified food. Evaluate the hypotheses, data, analysis, conclusions of each side, and including determining the extent to which each side in the debate relied on the available science, argues from an economical perspective, or appeals to the political and emotional concerns. Verify the data and either support or challenge the conclusions with other sources of information.
• CCSS 11-12 RST.8• Source: Achieve
Example/ Science Technical
• Sample B – Making a claim• Read and view different examples of case-making materials
related to GM food. Take a position and cite specific textual evidence from your sources, attending to important distinctions each authors makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account. Defend your conclusion from counter-claims Create a presentation of your analysis that highlights key evidence and your strongest claims.
• CCSS 11-12 RST 1. and RST 9.• Source: Achieve
How The Common Core Assessments will Differ
• Selective Assessments from Quadrant A to C• Performance Assessments from Quad. A to D• New mix of Literary to Informational (45/55)• Higher Lexile levels of 955-1155 for grades 6-8• Emphasis on level 4,5,6 Taxonomic level
( Analyze, Synthesize, Evaluate)• Emphasis on Quadrant D verbs
Literary/Informational TextLiterature Literature Literature Informational
Text
Stories Drama Poetry Literary Nonfiction and Historical, Scientific, and Technical Texts
Includes children’s adventure stories, folktales, legends, fables, fantasy, realistic fiction, and myth
Includes staged dialogue and brief familiar scenes
Includes nursery rhymes and the subgenres of the narrative poem, limerick, and free verse poem
Includes biographies and autobiographies; books about history, social studies, science, and the arts; technical texts, including directions, forms, and information displayed in graphs, charts, or maps; and digital sources on a range of topics
NAEP 2011 Writing Framework
Grade To Persuade To Explain To Convey Experience
4 30% 35% 35%
8 35% 35% 30%
12 40% 40% 20%
International Center for Leadership in Education
KNOWLEDGE
A P P L I C A T I O N
A B
DC
Acquisition Application
AdaptationAssimilation
Rigor/Relevance Framework
RIGOR
RELEVANCE
A B
DC
Rigor/Relevance Framework
RightAnswer
Did Students Get it Right?
RationalAnswer
RightQuestions
RightProcedure
High
HighLow
Low
RIGOR
RELEVANCE
A B
DC
Rigor/Relevance Framework
Recall, facts, observations, demonstrate
Next Generation
Summarize, analyze, organize, evaluate
Predict, design, create, innovate
Apply, relate, demonstrate
High
HighLow
Low
International Center for Leadership in Education
1
2
3
4
5
6
1 2 3 4 5
Verb list by Rigor/Relevance Quadrant
CalculatematchChoosememorizeCountnameDefinerecallDescribereciteFind
recordIdentifyselectLabelspellList
locate
AnalyzedifferentiateCategorize discriminateClassify evaluateCompare examineConclude explainContrast inferDefend judgeDiagram justify
prove
Adapt justifyArgue modifyCompose predictConclude prioritizeConstruct proposeDesign rateEvaluate recommendFormulate reviseInvent teach
Adjust interpretApply interviewBuildmakeCalculate modelConstruct playDemonstrate produceDramatize relateDraw sequenceIllustrate solve
Analytic Thinking Process
• What is the purpose of this material?• What is a key question that is addressed or
needs to be addressed?• What is the most important information?• What are the main inferences that can be
made?• What are the key ideas or concepts?
Analytic Thinking Process
• What are the assumptions the author(s) made in this information, issue, or source
• What are the implications of this information?• What is the main point of view that is
presented?• Paul,R. and Elder, L. (2003) Analytic
Thinking Foundation for Critical Thinking Press (page 23)
Tools and Suggestions
Your State Standards CCSS
Rigorous and Relevant Instruction
Sharing the standard with Students
International Center for Leadership in Education
Defining the Focus
Rigorous and Relevant Instruction
Analyze the verbs
International Center for Leadership in Education
Defining the Focus
Rigorous and Relevant Instruction
Reword – the standard
International Center for Leadership in Education
Defining the Focus
Rigorous and Relevant Instruction
“I can” statements
International Center for Leadership in Education
Defining the Focus
Student Understanding
“ What does this standard want you to be able to do or know?”
to
“What skills or knowledge do you have to demonstrate to be successful?”
International Center for Leadership in Education
Take a Three Minute Pulse
• After 10-15 discussion, reading, lecture• Reflect, discuss what they learned using higher order thinking
skills • Suggested questions: (Marzano)
– How does this information relate to you?– How does what we’ve just learned relate to..– How is what we just learned similar or different to– Identify one thing you knew and one thing that was new to
you…
International Center for Leadership in Education
Exit Sheet
I think I Got ItThis is what I learned:
This is how your lesson helped:
Still Need More PracticeI’m still struggling with:My biggest question is:
Tomorrow, TomorrowCan I have help with:I could practice by:
Teach Me MoreMini-lesson idea:
This would help me because:
International Center for Leadership in Education
One Minute Response
What I learned today…
What I am unclear/unsure about
Comments…
International Center for Leadership in Education
Diagnostic Learning Log
Major Concept Unsure/Questions My solutions
International Center for Leadership in Education
More Strategies
• Traffic Light feedback• Gallery Walk• Portfolio• Concept Map• Ticket out the door
International Center for Leadership in Education
Self Assessment cards
• Please notice…• I’ve learned…• I have a question…• I want you to know I was really stuck…• But I think I figured it out…• Still need practice:
– I’m struggling with…– My big question is…
International Center for Leadership in Education
A - Ask questions to recall facts, make observations, or demonstrate understanding:
What is/are ___?How many ___?What did you observe ___?What can you recall ___?In what ways ___? What did you notice about ___?What do/did you feel/see/hear/smell ___?What do/did you remember ___?What did you find out about ___?
B – Ask questions to apply or relate:How would you do that?Where will you use that knowledge?How does that relate to your experience?How can you demonstrate that?Calculate that for ___?How would you illustrate that?How do you know it works?Can you apply what you know to this real-
world problem?
C – Ask questions to summarize, analyze, organize, or evaluate:
How are these similar/different?How is this like?What’s another way we could express that?How can you distinguish between ___?How would you defend your position?What evidence can you offer?How do you know?
D – Ask questions to predict, design, or create:
How would you design a __ to __?How would you compose a song?Can you see a possible solution?Can you develop a proposal that would__?How would you do it differently?How would you devise your own way to deal
with ___?
KNOWLEDGE
A P P L I C A T I O N
• Extended Response
• Product Performance
Primary AssessmentsRigor/Relevance Framework
• Portfolio• Product
Performance• Interview• Self Reflection
• Process • Performance• Product
Performance
• Multiple Choice• Constructed
Response
Performance Assessments
• Set criteria• Student knows what is expected• Teacher must analyze what is essential in the
task
Developing Scoring Guides
• Holistic• Checklist• Analytic
International Center for Leadership in Education
Holistic
• Simplest• Broad categories• Each category is given maximum point value• Evaluator assigns points to each measure• Total score given to performance
International Center for Leadership in Education
Analytic (Rubric)
• Most popular for performance tasks• Several broad categories• Specific criteria for each category• High to low levels of performance• Sample guides
International Center for Leadership in Education
4 - Composition shows excellent understanding of narrative writing. It includes seven or more details to support the main idea and has a distinctive beginning, middle and ending. The paper sticks to the topic with a logical plan and sequence. It is well elaborated and easy to
understand.3 – Composition shows a reasonable understanding of narrative writing. It includes 5 or more details to support the main idea and has a beginning, middle and ending. It sticks to the topic most of the time but might have some unrelated details. The paper has a reasonable plan ….21
RIGOR
RELEVANCE
A B
DCIncreasing Rigor/Relevance
High
HighLow
Low
• Quick Quadrant D Strategies
Vocabulary Implications
• Emphasis on “broader language and context” focus – figurative and connotative
• Domain language (content vocabulary) important
Design and Organization Three main sections
K-5 (cross-disciplinary)
6-12 English Language Arts
6-12 Literacy in History/Social Studies, Science, and Technical Subjects
Design and Organization
Shared responsibilities for students’ literacy development
To Get Ready
• Susan Gendron recommended two short and one long research projects a year.
• The plan…
The Extremes
One Possibility• SY 14-15 Common Core Assessments begin• SY 13-14 Interdisciplinary Projects - Tested
and Ready (These students will be next year’s 8th graders.)
• SY 12-13 First Year of Interdisciplinary Projects – Getting the Kinks Out
• SY 11-12 Department Projects Defining the Targets – what do rigorous
performance standards look like Building Skills and Resources – how do we
teach to get everyone to hit the targets
Build The Writing Skills• First Quarter – Main ideas and relevant details• Second Quarter – Citing Specific Details and credibility of author and
sources• Third Quarter – Citing Sources
• All contents and All quarters – Work on Writing Fluency (250 -500 word writing responses:1) Answering the question 2) Sufficient and Specific details 3) Explain how details support answer
• Share Student Work, Run Demos, and Share Tips: Faculty Meeting, SDTTP
• Expand to Include: What will be my topic/ What is my opinion/ Steps to solving …
Possibilities and Parameters?
Common Core State Standards: Begin with the End in Mind
Susan GendronSenior Fellow
International Center for Educational LeadershipPolicy Coordinator, SMARTER
To learn more
Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
http://parcconline.org
SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium
www.k12.wa.us/SMARTER
44 States + DC Have Adopted the Common Core State Standards
*Minnesota adopted the CCSS in ELA only
STANDARDS FORENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS
&LITERACY IN HISTORY/SOCIAL STUDIES,
SCIENCE, AND TECHNICAL SUBJECTS
JUNE 2010
www.corestandards.org
Reading Framework for NAEP 2009
Grade Literary Informational
4 50% 50%
8 45% 55%
12 30% 70%
Text Complexity Grade Bands and Associated Lexile Ranges
Text Complexity Grade Band in the
Standards
Old Lexile Ranges Lexile Ranges Aligned to CCR expectations
K-1 N/A N/A
2-3 450-725 450-790
4-5 645-845 770-980
6-8 860-1010 955-1155
9-10 960-1115 1080-1305
11-CCR 1070-1220 1215-1355
Lexile Analyzerhttp://www.lexile.com/analyzer/
Building Analytic Thinking Skills
• Word “analysis” appears 57 times in the CCSS with 77 mentions of associated analysis words such as “compare and contrast”
• Analysis – precursor to high level thinking
• Lin Kuzmich• Stretch Learning Handbook
Next Generation Assessments