Model I.R._-_ GSB+WBM Gr.II+CC _ 20.01.2014

DATA INPUTSENTER DATA IN RED CELLS ONLY

1 Date of Inspection :: 12.01.2014

2 Name of the Work ::

3 Block :: Kanagal4 Sub-Division :: PIU Munugode5 Division :: PIU Nalgonda6 District :: Nalgonda

7 Admn.Sanction ::

8 Name of the Grant :: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)9 Estimate Cost :: Rs.195.35 Lakhs

10 Length of the Road :: 5.60 KM

11 Technical Sanction ::

12 Agreement ::

13 Date of the Commencement :: 17.01.201215 Time fixed for Completion 11 Months15 Date of Completion :: Not Specified.

16 Name of the Agency :: Sri.G.Narender Reddy ,R/O Nalgonda.

17 Tender Premium ::-2.25

18 SSR :: 2010-1119 EOAT :: -20 M.Book Nos. :: A/635/08-09, A/637/08-09 & A/636/08-09.21 Name of the Executing Staf

EE :: Er.A.Bhaskar Rao.EE(PIU),NalgondaDYEE :: Er.K.Ramchandra Reddy,PIU SD Munugode.

AEE :: Er.G.Shankar Babu,AEE22 Name of the QC Inspection Staf

DYEE :: Er.Y.Neelakanteshwar.AEE :: Er.K.Ravi Kumar.

Asst.Executive Engineer-1,

R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)

Vide Go.Rt.No.647 dated 27.04.2011 of PR & RD Dept. Govt.of A.P.

T.S.No. /10-11 dated 26.05.2011 of CE(PR) Nabard,HydSE(PR)Nalgonda Agrt.No. /11-12 dated : 09.01.2012

(-) 2.25% Less than the sanctioned Esst Rates 2010-2011.

DATA INPUTS

FIELD OBSERVATIONS1 Items Inspected ::

a GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0b WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0c CC M30 Mix 200mm - 0/0 to 0/25, 3/5 to 4/0.d CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x 900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nose Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.

2 GSBChainage 0/0 - 1/0 1/0 - 2/0 2/0 - 3/0 3/0 - 4/0Location 0/4-5 L 0/8+46 R 1/4+9 L 2/0-22 R 2/4+12 L 2/8+12 R 3/4+28 L 3/8+12 R

Thickness (Specified) 200 200 200 200 200 200 200 200Thickness (Observed) LS 205 210 195 198 200 205 210 215

C - - - - - - - -RS 200 205 197 199 200 205 205 210

Width in Mtrs (Specified) 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00 4.00Width in Mtrs (Observed) 4.00 4.05 4.06 4.02 4.05 4.03 4.01 4.05

Length in Mtrs (Specified) 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00Length in Mtrs (Observed) 995.00 1000.00 1000.00 1000.00

Estimate Qty.(Compact) 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00 400.00GSB Rate 415.00

3 WBM Gr.IIChainage 0/0 - 1/0 1/0 - 2/0 2/0 - 3/0 3/0 - 4/0Location 0/4-5 L 0/8+46 R 1/4+9 L 2/0-22 R 2/4+12 L 2/8+12 R 3/4+28 L 3/8+12 R

Width in Mtrs (Specified) 3.75Width in Mtrs (Observed) 3.76 3.75 3.74 3.73 3.76 3.75 3.75 3.79

Thickness in mm (Specified) 75Thickness in mm (Observed) LS 77 81 70 74 81 81 77 78

C 76 79 73 72 78 76 76 81RS 79 76 71 73 82 79 79 80

Total(Specified)Wt.in Kgs. 31.85Total(Observed)Wt.in Kgs. 33 35 34 32 29.5 30 34 33

SIEVE ANALYSIS( Retained On)90mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.0063mm 4.50 2.00 4.50 3.00 5.50 2.00 1.00 5.0053mm 8.00 25.00 8.00 9.00 12.00 8.00 9.00 8.0045mm 7.50 5.00 7.50 10.00 10.50 10.00 11.00 7.50

22.4mm 11.50 2.00 11.50 9.00 4.00 12.00 14.00 11.60Estimate Qty.(Compact) 140.63 140.63 140.63 140.63 140.63 140.63 140.63 140.63

281.25 281.25 281.25 281.25RATE OF WBM Gr.II 1451.71

6 CC PAVEMENT

Qty. Reprsd

LS RS

i Kanagal village- 250.00mts. 30 3.75 3.78 200 210 208 209 22.500/0 to 0/25 60 3.75 3.70 200 195 198 197 22.50

90 3.75 3.82 200 190 190 190 22.50120 3.75 3.78 200 196 197 197 22.50150 3.75 3.80 200 208 200 204 22.50180 3.75 3.75 200 180 185 183 22.50210 3.75 3.76 200 196 198 197 22.50240 3.75 3.75 200 198 194 196 22.50

ii Turkapally village- 500.00mts. 30 3.75 3.78 200 210 208 209 22.503/5 to 4/0 60 3.75 3.75 200 215 206 211 22.50

90 3.75 3.82 200 205 200 203 22.50120 3.75 3.78 200 196 192 194 22.50150 3.75 3.80 200 208 200 204 22.50

Chainage from Start of CC

Width in Mtrs (Specified)

Width in Mtrs (Observed)

Thickness in mm (Specified)

Thickness in mm (Observed) Average Thk Observed

180 3.75 3.75 200 206 205 206 22.50210 3.75 3.65 200 200 210 205 22.50240 3.75 3.75 200 198 215 207 22.50270 3.75 3.78 200 200 198 199 22.50300 3.75 3.75 200 208 200 204 22.50330 3.75 3.82 200 206 205 206 22.50360 3.75 3.78 200 200 210 205 22.50390 3.75 3.8 200 198 215 207 22.50420 3.75 3.75 200 215 206 211 22.50450 3.75 3.76 200 205 200 203 22.50480 3.75 3.75 200 200 198 199 22.50

RATE OF M30 CC 4350

CD WORKS

GOVERNMENT OF ANDHRA PRADESHPANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

DATE OF INSPECTION :: 12.01.2014

NAME OF THE WORK ::

ESTIMATE COST :: Rs.195.35 Lakhs

NAME OF THE GRANT :: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

NAME OF THE MANDAL :: Kanagal

NAME OF THE SUB-DIVISION :: PIU Munugode

NAME OF THE DIVISION :: PIU Nalgonda

ITEMS COVERED a GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0

b WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0

c CC M30 Mix 200mm - 0/0 to 0/25, 3/5 to 4/0.

d

e Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.

INSPECTION REPORT BY QUALITY CONTROL WING

NALGONDA DISTRICT

R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)

CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x 900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nos


INSPECTION REPORT BY QUALITY CONTROL WING NALGONDA DISTRICTCHECK SLIP

Name of Work R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)

Est Cost-Rs Rs.195.35 Lakhs NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)ANNEXURE-I

Sl No Item

1 Name of Inspecting officer Yes2 Date of Inspection Yes3 Work details

a)Name of the Work Yes b)Estimate Cost. Yesc) Grant. Yesd) Admn.Sanction.and date Yese) Tech.Sanction.and date Yesg) Date of commencement Yesh) Date of completion as per agrement Yesi) Actual date of completion Yesj) EOAT Details Yesk) Deviation items executed on the date of inspection -

4 Details of Estimate provisions Yes5 Details of all items of work done as on the day of inspection Yes6 QC verification details by QC Wing

a) Previous inspection details Yesi) Status of previous recovery proposals Yesii) Recovery details voucher wise -iii) Recovery details with MB reference -b) Present inspection detailsi) Details of items done after prevoius inspection Yesii) Details of items not inspected with reasons -iii) Items in which deficiency found during this inspection Yesv) Details pertaining to recovery amount Yesvi) Whether calcutations sheets enclosed Yes

7 Details of Recovery Rates a) Details like TP ,OH,CP etc considered Yesb) Whether followed circulars for Over Size Metal Yesc) Whether Names of Executing staf given Yes(If Deficiency more than 20%)d) Whether MB Reference is given Yes ( for Items in which deficiency more than 20%)

Whether details given Yes/No

8 Tests for various items of work done or not a

1) Thickness of Layer Yes2) Weight of Sample Yes3) Sieve Analysis for Chips -4) Bitumin Extract Test Yes

b WBM 1)Thickness of Layer Yes2)Weight of Sample Yes3)Sieve Analysis for Metal Yes4)Aggregate Impact Test -5)% Defciency for Over Size Yes6)Weight of Screenings -7)Sieve Analysis -

c CC Roads 1)Grade of Cement -2)Mix Design -3)Strength of Cubes casted -4)Core samples and strengths -5)Width and Thickness Yes

Dy.Executive Engineer,(PR) V & Q.C.Sub.Division, Nalgonda.

BT items


INSPECTION REPORT BY QUALITY CONTROL WING NALGONDA DISTRICT

QC Ref.No: AEE1/V&QC/NLG/DVK/51/2013-14, date :: 14.06.2013Mandal :: KanagalSub Division :: PIU MunugodeDivision :: PIU NalgondaDate of Inspection :: 12.01.2014

1 Name of the Work :: R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)

2 Estimate Cost. :: Rs.195.35 Lakhs3 Name of Grant. :: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)4 Admn.Sanction. :: Vide Go.Rt.No.647 dated 27.04.2011 of PR & RD Dept. Govt.of A.P.5 Technical Sanction. :: T.S.No. /10-11 dated 26.05.2011 of CE(PR) Nabard,Hyd6 Agreement No.& Date :: SE(PR)Nalgonda Agrt.No. /11-12 dated : 09.01.2012

7 :: Sri.G.Narender Reddy ,R/O Nalgonda.

8 Tender Percentage :: (-) 2.25% Less than the sanctioned Esst Rates 2010-2011. 9 SSR Adopted :: 2010-11

10 Date of Commencement. :: 17.01.201211 Date of completion. :: Not Specified.12 Extension of Time Details :: -13 M.Book References :: A/635/08-09, A/637/08-09 & A/636/08-09.14 Names of the Executive Staf

E.E. :: Er.A.Bhaskar Rao.EE(PIU),NalgondaDy.E.E. :: Er.K.Ramchandra Reddy,PIU SD Munugode.A.E.E. :: Er.G.Shankar Babu,AEE

15

Dy.E.E. :: Er.Y.Neelakanteshwar.A.E.E. :: Er.K.Ravi Kumar.

16 Estimate Provisions ::S.No. Description of Item Unit Remarks

Chainage Chainage

a Clearing & grubbing road land :: 0/25 to 3/5 10080 Sqm 0/25 to 3/5 10080

b EWE from Side Pits :: 0/25 to 3/42 7774 Cum 0/25 to 3/42 7774

Name of the Agency who executed the work

Name of the Q.C. Staf who Inspected the Work.

As per Working Estimate

As per Work Done/ Executed till date.

Qty.Apprvd

Qty.Executed

c EWE from borrow pits :: 15470 Cum 15470

d GSB - 200mm :: 0/0 to 4/0 3200 Cum 0/0 to 4/0 3200

e WBM Grade-II 75 mm :: 0/2+50 to 4/0 1456.88 Cum 1456.88

f M30 CC Pavement 200mm Mtrs

g Granular Shoulders of 150mm :: 0/0 to 4/0 2621.03 Cum 0/0 to 4/0 2621.03

h Constn. Of CD works ::

Asst.Executive Engineer-1, Dy.Executive Engineer,(PR) Vig & QC Sub-Division, Nalgonda. (PR) Vig & QC Sub-Division, Nalgonda.

Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PR) Vig.& QC Division, Hyderabad for information.Copy Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PRI) Division Miryalaguda for neccessary action.

0/2+50 to 4/0

0/0 to 0/2+50, 3/5 to 4/0

250, 100

0/0 to 0/2+50, 3/5 to 4/0

250,100

CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x 900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nos

Office of the Deputy Executive Engineer (PR) Vigilance & Quality Control Sub-division Nalgonda.

GENERAL OBSERVATION SHEETName of The work :: R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)Estimate Cost :: Rs.195.35 LakhsGrant :: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

1 Stage of the Worki Work completed.

2 Previous inspection detailsi Not Inspected earlierii3 Details of Previous Inspection.

Item Inspected Deficiency Observed Remarks

N/A

4 The Present Inspection covers the following items.a GSB 200mm thick - KM 0/0 to 4/0b WBM Gr II layer - KM 0/0 to 4/0c CC M30 Mix 200mm - 0/0 to 0/25, 3/5 to 4/0.d CD Works- 1V x 900MM dia-3 Nos, 2V x 900mm dia, 1V x 600mm dia-4 Nose Granular Shoulders - 0/0 to 4/0.

5 Present Inspection Details are as follows.1) Road Furnitures :- a Physicals::i KM / HM Stones are fixed.ii 4 Nos KM Stones are provided.iii 16 Nos HM stones are provided.iv Road Nomenclature/Display board fixed at the starting of the road.v Sign Boards such as Mandatory, Cautionary, Informatory are provided as per IRC 67-2001.b Observations::

i

ii

iii Some of the sign boards are not confirming the IRC stipulations.

The above road is inspected on dated: 04.01.2013 along with the concerned field staf .

Recovery Proposed

The Size/Dimensions of the KM and HM Stones are not as per the IRC 8-1980 , IRC-26-1967 standard specifications respectively.The KM and HM stones shall be fixed in M15 (1:2:4) concrete cradle all round as per the IRC codal stipulations.

iv

c Suggestions::

i

ii

iii

d Deficiencies & Recoveries::

i

ii Amount proposed for recovery due to non-standard Road furniture. Rs. 2500.002) Sub Base :-a Physical Measurements::i The Width & Depth of GSB are measured and tabulated in Annexure -I.ii The Length of GSB is measured and tabulated in Annexure -I.b Observations::i The Gravel sub base is executed with locally available gravel soils.ii The Compaction of the GSB Layer to OMC is not achieved.iii The Field density of the GSB layer is conducted and the density observed is 1.98gms/cc.

iv

v The Super Elevation & extra widening at horizontal curves at Ch..are not observed.c Suggestions::

i

ii

iii

iv

v

vi The Surface defects and Structural defects shall be corrected.

vii

viii

d Deficiencies & Recoveries::i The deficiency is observed in length of layer in 1st Km and tabulated in Annexure -I.

The Sign Boards shall be fixed in M15 (1:2:4) concrete cradle all round as per the IRC codal stipulations.

IRC -8-1980 & IRC-26-1967 prescribes the standards for KM/HM Stones and shall be followed in case of KM/HM stones. Pl. refer this office Circular on Road Furniture on KM/HM Stones vide Cir.No. AEE/HM-KM Stones/VQC Nlg/2013. Dated: 28.06.2013 for the gist of IRC provisions.The Size / Colouring of Sign Boards shall be as per IRC-67-2001 and the Lettering & Numbering of the Sign Boards shall be as per the IRC 30-1968 Codal provisions.

One KM Stone and Two HM Sones are proposed for rejection as the Size & Colouring & Lettering is not as per standards presribed and not properly fixed in concrete cradle.

Surface defects::The corrugations(bumps), pot holes, ruts (depressions ) in wheel track, ravelling (separation) , surface erosion, soft spots are appeared in some reaches. Structural Defects:: Failure of sub-grade are not noticed.

The Gradation of Soils shall confirm to the Table 8.2 of IRC _SP_20-2002. The soil material shall yield min. CBR of 15.Density of layer shall not less than the 98% of max.dry density as Cl. 8.4.1 of IRC _SP_20-2002. The Horizontal alignment :; The edge of carriage way shall be correct with in the tolerable limits of 20mm as per Cl.3.6 of IRC-SP-77-2008 .Surface Levels :: The Tolerance in surface level shall be with in the limits of 10mm as per IRC-SP-77-2008.The Surface regularity :; The max.permitted diference between the gravel surface and straight edge shall be 12mm for longitudinal profile and 10mm for cross profile as per IRC-SP-77-2008

The Super Elevation at horizontal curves 7% minimum shall be provided at Ch.as per Cl.2.10.3 of IRC-Sp20-2002. The connected extra widening shall be provided min. 60cm to 90cm as per Table 2.17 IRC-Sp20-2002.The Horizontal curves & Transitional curves shall be provided as per IRC-Sp-20-2002 vide Cl.2.10.2 & 2.10.5

ii No deficiency in width is observed.iii The deficiency is observed in thickness of layer in 2nd Km and tabulated in Annexure -I.iv Recovery for deficient qty. are calculated and tabulated in Annex -II. Rs. 11360.003) WBM Grade II :- a Physical Measurements::i The Width & Depth of WBM Gr.II are measured and tabulated in Annexure -III.ii The Length of WBM Gr.II is measured and tabulated in Annexure -III.b Observations::i The machine crushed /hand brocken metal was used in the WBM Gr.II layer.ii Sieve Analysis of WBM Gr.II Metal is carried out & tabulated in Annexure -IV.iii Oversize metal in 63mm sieve is observed at certain locations & tabulated in Annexure -IV.

iv

v

vi The quantity of screenings are observed lesser than the approved in the WBM Gr.II Layer.vii The excess gravel blindage was used in the WBM Gr.II Layer.viii The required camber @ 3.50% to 2.50% is not observed.ix The Super Elevation & extra widening at horizontal curves at Ch..are not observed.

x

c Suggestions::

i

ii The blindage material shall confirm to the specifications laid down in the IRC Sp 20-2002.

iii

iv

v

vi The rolling shall be scientifically done as per this office circular dt.10.01.2014

vii

viii

ix

d Deficiencies & Recoveries::

i

Undersize metal in 45mm/22.4mm sieve was observed at certain locations & tabulated in Annexure -IV.The weight of metal observed at various sections are tabulated in Annexure -III. The variation observed from highest to lowest weigths are more than 20%.

The surface undulations in longitudinal direction ( 12mm ) and transverse direction ( 8mm) are exceeding the prescribed limits.

The quantity of screenings shall be as per Table 5 of IRC-19-2005 & blindage material shall be limited to the prescribed limits as per Clause 3.5.2 of IRC 19-2005.

The required camber at 3.5% shall be maintained as per the Table 2.11 of IRC SP-20-2002, in case the WBM surface is the end surface or else 3.0% for end surface of BT, or else 2.50% for end surface of CC.The Super Elevation at horizontal curves 7% minimum shall be provided at Ch.as per Cl.2.10.3 of IRC-Sp20-2002. The connected extra widening shall be provided min. 60cm to 90cm as per Table 2.17 IRC-Sp20-2002.The Horizontal curves & Transitional curves shall be provided as per IRC-Sp-20-2002 vide Cl.2.10.2 & 2.10.5

The side shoulder shall be constructed simultaneously with WBM Layers as per Cl.8.6.1 of IRC Sp 20-2002.The surface evenness in longitudinal direction ( Max. permitted undulations 12mm ) and transverse direction ( 8mm) shall be adhered to as per Table 6 of IRC-19-2005.The edges of carriage way shall be with in the tolerance limits of 25mm with respect to center line of carriage way as per Cl.7.2.2 of IRC-Sp-11-1988.

No deficiency is observed in length of layer and the observations are tabulated as annexure-III.

ii

iii

iv Oversize metal is observed in 1st, 2nd, 3rd km and are tabulated in annexure IV.

v Rs. 82390.00

vi Rs. 4456.00

5) CC Pavement::a Physical Measurements::

i

ii The Length of CC pavement is measured and tabulated in Annexure-XI.

iii

iv

b Observations::

i

ii

iii The edges are not finished properly. Many honey combs are visible.iv The surface finish is not as per IRCv The metal was exposed at certain places.

vi

vii The longitudinal alignment is not to line & length.

c Suggestions::

i

ii The sides of CC Pavement shall be neatly finished.

iii

iv

v

vi Admixtures conforming to 18:6925 and IS:9103 may be used.

The deficiency in width is observed in 2nd Km and the observations are tabulated as annexure-III.No deficiency is observed in thickness of layer and the observations are tabulated as annexure-III.

Recovery for deficient qty. are calculated and tabulated in Annex -V. The recovery was efected as per Govt. in PR&RD Dept Memo No.15320/VIG.I/2005-1,dt.12.5.2006 Recovery for Oversize of metal was calculated and tabulated in Annex -VI, as per Govt. in R&B Dept. vide Cir. Memo dt. 17.10.2006

Physical measurements of the CC pavements in the village Kanagal -250.00mts & CC pavement at Thurkapally village -100.00mts are verified.

The width & depth of CC Pavements at the edges are measured and enclosed in Annexure-XI.Rebound Hammer tests on surface of CC Pavements are conducted randomly and the results are tabulated. (Statement Enclosed).

The Expansion Joints with 25mm Mastic Pad at every 27mtrs, at road junctions, at joint with old CC Pavements etc., are not adhered to as per IS-6509-1995 code.The Contraction Joints at every 4.50m c/c are not properly executed as per IS-6509-1995 code.

The loose mortar was visible on CC Surface indicating excess W/C ratio, excess fine aggregates.

The Executive Engineer (PIU) Nalgonda is requested to assess the strength of concrete by cube/core extraction test before making payment, as the field engineers are not submitted the compressive strength results of cc cubes.

The longitudinal alighnment should true to line & length and the variation should not exceed 10mm as per IRC 34-3009.The spacing of expansion & construction joints should be provided as per IS-6509-1995. ( 4.50m c/c for Contraction joints & 27m c/c for Expansion Joints). And the construction procedure as per the Cl.8 of IRC -15-1981.The expansion & construction joints should be filled with bitumen sealant as per the provisions of Cl.9.20 of IRC 15-2002 and the method of sealing joints shall be as per Cl.6 of IRC-57-1974.

vii

viii

ix

x Texture depths shall be in the range of 1.0mm to 1.25mm depth (IRC_15-2000)xi The construction of CC Pavements shall be as per the Cl.9 of IRC-15-2002

xii

xiii

xiv

xv

xvi

d Deficiencies & Recoveries::i Deficiency in Length , Width & Depth of CC surface are observed.ii Recovery is proposed for deficiencies in length, width & thickness. Rs. 0

7) Shoulders:-a Physical Measurements::i The Width & Depth of Gravel Shoulders are observed as 1.50M & 150mm thick.ii The shoulders are laid all along the road.

iii

b Observations::i The Gravel shoulders are executed with locally available gravel soils.ii The compaction of the Gravel shoulders to OMC is not achieved.

iii

iv

v The sectioning of shoulders is not done properly.v The rain gullies on the shoulders are observed.c Suggestions::

The surface shall be of correct alignment, grade and contour specified. At any point tested, the concrete shall not show a departure greater than 4 mm from the true surface as per Cl.9.22.5 of IRC-15-2002.

The surface evenness in longitudinal direction ( Max. permitted undulations 8mm ) and transverse direction ( 4mm) shall be adhered to as per Table 7.1 of IRC-SP-11-2005.The actual surface levels shall not vary from designed levels by 10mm as per Cl.7.2.2 of IRC-Sp-11-1988.

The edges of carriage way shall be with in the tolerance limits of 25mm with respect to center line of carriage way as per Cl.7.2.2 of IRC-Sp-11-1988The surface texture shall be applied on top of cc pavements to control skidding and improve the riding quality. Surface Texture depths shall be in the range of 1.0mm to 1.25mm depth (Table 9 of IRC_15-2002)It has to be checked that no extra water or bleeding shall occur on the top surface of concrete. Excessive water at the top will make the top surface very weak and there will be more abrasion (IRC:SP:20-2002). Steel Box Containers:: Pl.refer the Chief Engineer (Designs & Admn.),PR, Hyd. vide Cir.Memo No.AEE4/DEE1(D)/CC ROADS/2008 Dt 23.10.2008 that the Measurement of Volume Mix concrete in rural areas is generally done by locally made containers and there is no uniformity in size. It is advisable to key 6 steel boxes each with a volume of half bag, the size being 300 x 300 x 195mm with 2 handles. With usage of this boxes quality of concrete improves. Pl.refer this office Cir.No. AEE1/CC Roads/VQC Nlg/2013, Dated: 16.08.2013 for comprehensive Planning, Design & Construction of Cement Concrete Pavements in rural areas compiled from various IRC Codes.

No deficiency in Length , Width & Depth of GSB is observed with respect to the M.Book recordings. (Statement is enclosed ).

The transverse slope at 4% and or more than 0.50% of carriage way slope are not maintained. The edges of Road Way shall be with in the tolerance limits of 40mm with respect to center line of carriage way as per Cl.7.2.2 of IRC-Sp-11-1988

i The pot holes and rain gallies should be attended.

ii

iii The transverse slope and sectioning of shoulders should be as per the IRC SP6 -2004.

iv

v

d Deficiencies & Recoveries::i No recovery is proposed. Rs 0

8) CD Worksa Physical Measurements::

The following CD Structures are constructed

i

ii The body walls and parapet wall are constructed with M15.iii The length & depth of Body wall ,the length, width & depth of Parapet wall are measured.

The overall outer to outer length of parapet was and observed as 7.5m.b Observations::i The overall outer to outer length of pipe culvert at ch. was and observed as 7.5m.ii The Length,Width and Depth of parapet are measured.iii The culvert body wall is not true to line and plumb.

iv

v The alignment of pipes are not parallel to the stream.

vi

vii

viii The sufficient distance between pipe rows are not maintained.

c Suggestions::

i

ii

iii

The construction shall be done in layers each matching the thickness of adjoining layer. Only after a layer of WBM, shoulder shall be laid and compacted. Next corresponding layers in pavement shall be taken up after the completion of first layer of WBM and shoulder.

The compaction requirement of earthen shoulder is 100% of Standard Proctor Density ( IS-2720-1980).The crossfall for earth shoulders should be at least 0.5 % steeper than the slope of the pavement subject to a minimum of 4%. On super elevated sections, the shoulders should normally have the same crossfallas the pavementto drain of surface water.

RCC NP3 Pipe culverts:: (1) 1V x 600mm dia at ch(2) 1V x 900mm dia at ch.,(3) 2V x 900mm dia a ch.....

The parapet walls are intruding into the roadeway width and not aligned parellel to the center line of carriage way.

The invert of the pipes are not placed 150mm below the average bed level as per this office circular instructions dt.11.12.2013. The cushion between the top of the pipe and the road top level shall was observed only 40cm (approx).

A culvert should be located to fit the natural channel in line and grade as far as is practical and aligned to give the stream a direct entrance and a direct exit and should be aligned the natural skew in a channel as far as possible.The Numbering of CD works shall be as per IRC-7-1971.The methodology for inscribing numbers on parapets, RCC posts has been given, in IRC:7 'Recommended Practice for Numbering of Bridges and Culverts. The size of letter shall not be less than 100mm high and shall conform to IRC:30' Standard Letters and Numerals of Diferent Heights for Use on Highway Signs'.The cushion between the top of the pipe and the road top level shall not be less than 600 mm. (IRC SP13-2004) and preferably 1.0M (IRC_SP-20-2002).

iv

v

vi The protection of entry and exit ends are desirable by way of providing stone approns.

d Deficiencies & Recoveries::i No recovery is proposed. Rs 0

8) Observations on Geometrics:-i The Camber at 3.5% is not observed any where.ii The Superelevations and Extra width at curves are not properly designed & executed.iii Surface irrgularities are observed beyond tolerable limits.iv The Geometrical design standards for rural roads shall be adopted as per IRC-73-1980

v

9) General Observations & Sugggestions:

i

ii The quality control register was not submitted by the field engineers during inspection.iii Physical requirements of coarse aggregates for WBM shall be as per IS: 2386 or IS: 5640

iv

v

vi

vii

viii

10) Overall Recovery. Rs. 100706.00


The Clear Distance between Pipes may be adopted as 500mm for pipes dia. less than 1000mm and 600mm for the pipes above 1200mm. (IRC_SP-20-2002).

A quadrilateral revetment on four sides with RR Stones not less than 225mm thick with 150mm gravel backing shall be provided to safe guard the embankment against scour as the embankment is quite high.

The Sectioning of Embankment slopes are to be corrected to 2:1 section as per EW Calculation sheets.

The Existing Road Crust particulars are neither recorded in the M.Book nor it is attested by E.E.PR concerned. The designed crust as per IRC Codes based on Traffic Survey is not furnished.

Grading requirements of coarse aggregates for WBM Gr.II / Gr.III shall be followed as per Table 2 of IRC-19-2005Details of Material test results for Granular material and Metal aggragates are not furnsished during inspection.The field staf are requested to test Granular Material for PI value, CBR value, MDD & OMC and WBM metal for the Gradation, AIV value and satisfy them selves before executing the works in all future works.

During inspection the QC staf was unable to ascertain the degree of % of compaction for granular sub base & shoulders in obsence of Lab MDD Test results. The compaction requirement of earthen shoulder is 100% of Standard Proctor Density ( IS-2720-1980).

The Executive Engineer (PR) PIU Nalgonda is requested to instruct the field staf to attend the above stated remarks, recover the amount for deficient iems calculated here under and report compliance. The recovery statement shall be forwarded to this office on monthly basis for onward submission. The field obseravation calculation sheets are enclosed.

Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PR) Vig.& QC Division, Hyderabad for information.

Copy Submitted to the Executive Engineer (PRI) Division Miryalaguda for neccessary action.

PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT

VIGILANCE & QUALITY CONTROL SUB-DIVISION NALGONDA.Name of the Work :- R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)Estt Cost:- Rs.195.35 LakhsGrant :- NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

ANNEXURE-IPhysical Measurements of Granular Sub Base

Sl.No Location

Thickness Measured in mm Length of the GSB in Meters

L/S Centre R/S Average Observed Observed

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 9 10 11

1 0/4-5 L 205 - 200 203 200 4.00 4.002 0/8+46 R 210 - 205 208 200 4.00 4.05

Avg. for 1st KM 206 200 0 4.00 4.03 0 1000.00 995.00 0.50%3 1/4+9 L 195 - 197 196 200 4.00 4.064 2/0-22 R 198 - 199 199 200 4.00 4.02

Avg. for 2nd KM 198 200 1.25% 4.00 4.04 0 1000.00 1000.00 05 2/4+12 L 200 - 200 200 200 4.00 4.056 2/8+12 R 205 - 205 205 200 4.00 4.03

Avg. for 3rd KM 203 200 0 4.00 4.04 0 1000.00 1000.00 07 3/4+28 L 210 - 205 208 200 4.00 4.018 3/8+12 R 215 - 210 213 200 4.00 4.05

Avg. for 4th KM 211 200 0 4.00 4.03 0 1000.00 1000.00 0

Asst.Executive Engineer-1, Dy.Executive Engineer,

Specified thickness

in mm

% Deficiency

in Thickness

Width of the Carriage Way in Meters

As per Estimate/M.Book

% Deficiency in Width

As per Estimate/M.Book

% Deficiency in Length

(PR) Vig & QC Sub-Division, Nalgonda. (PR) Vig & QC Sub-Division, Nalgonda.

PANCHAYAT RAJ ENGINEERING DEPARTMENTVIGILANCE & QUALITY CONTROL SUB-DIVISION NALGONDA.

Name of the Work :- R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)Estt Cost:- Rs.195.35 LakhsGrant :- NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

ANNEXURE-IIRecovery Calculations towards Deficiency in Quantity of Gravel Sub Base.

S.No. Chainage

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 0/0 - 1/0 800.00 0 0.00 0 0 0.50% 4.00 4.00 405.66 1623.002 1/0 - 2/0 800.00 1.25% 10.00 0 0 0 0.00 10.00 4057.003 2/0 - 3/0 800.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.004 3/0 - 4/0 800.00 0 0.00 0 0 0 0.00 0.00 0.00

TOTAL RECOVERABLE AMOUNT 5680.00DOUBLE RECOVERY 11360.00


Total Est.Qty.the Sample represented (compact)

cum

% of Deficiency

in Thickness

Deficiency in Qty. due to

Less Thickness

(cum)

% of Deficiency in Width

Deficiency in Qty. due

to Less Width(cum)

% of Deficiency in Length

Deficiency in Qty. due

to Less Length(cum)

Total Deficiency in Qty. due

to Less Thickness/

Width(cum)

Rate applicable/

(cum)

Amount of recovery in Rs



ANNEXURE-IIIPhysical Observations of WBM Gr.II Layer

Sl.No LocationThickness Measured in mm

L/S Centre R/S Average Observed Spcified in Kgs1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 0/4-5 L 70 73 71 71 75 3.76 3.75 33.002 0/8+46 R 74 73 75 74 75 3.75 3.75 35.00

Avg. for KM 73 75 3.76 3.75 1000.00 34.003 1/4+9 L 76 77 79 77 75 3.74 3.75 34.004 2/0-22 R 75 74 78 76 75 3.73 3.75 32.00

Avg. for KM 77 75 3.74 3.75 1000.00 33.005 2/4+12 L 81 78 82 80 75 3.76 3.75 29.506 2/8+12 R 81 76 79 79 75 3.75 3.75 30.00

Avg. for KM 80 75 3.76 3.75 1000.00 29.757 3/4+28 L 77 76 79 77 75 3.76 3.75 34.008 3/8+12 R 78 81 80 80 75 3.75 3.75 33.00

Avg. for KM 79 75 3.76 3.75 1000.00 33.50


Thickness Specified in

mm

Width of the Carriage Way in Meters Length observed in

Mtrs

Weight of Metal Observed



ANNEXURE-IVGradation of WBM Gr.II Metal Layer

Pit No.ILocation 0/4-5 L

33.00 kgs

IS sieve

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

90 mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 O/S Nil63 mm 4.50 4.50 13.64 86.36 90 -100 O/S 3.64 %53 mm 8.00 12.50 37.88 62.12 25 - 75 O/S Nil U/S Nil45 mm 7.50 20.00 60.61 39.39 0 - 15 U/S 24.39 %

22.4 mm 11.50 31.50 95.45 4.55 0 - 5 U/S Nil

Pit No.IILocation 0/8+46 R

35.00 kgs

90 mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 O/S Nil63 mm 2.00 2.00 5.71 94.29 90 -100 O/S Nil53 mm 25.00 27.00 77.14 22.86 25 - 75 O/S 2.14 %U/S Nil45 mm 5.00 32.00 91.43 8.57 0 - 15 U/S Nil

22.4 mm 2.00 34.00 97.14 2.86 0 - 5 U/S Nil

Pit No.IIILocation 1/4+9 L

34.00 kgs


22.4 mm 11.50 31.50 92.65 7.35 0 - 5 U/S 2.35 %

Pit No.IVLocation 2/0-22 R

32.00 kgs

90 mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 O/S Nil63 mm 3.00 3.00 9.38 90.62 90 -100 O/S Nil53 mm 9.00 12.00 37.50 62.50 25 - 75 O/S Nil U/S Nil45 mm 10.00 22.00 68.75 31.25 0 - 15 U/S 16.25 %

Wt. Sample Obtained in the Standard Pit of Size 0.50M x 0.50M

Weight retained

(kgs)

Cumulative Weight

retained(kgs)

% of weight

retained

% of weight passing

% of passing

specified

% of oversize/under size




IS sieve

1 2 3 4 5 6 7

Weight retained

(kgs)

Cumulative Weight

retained(kgs)

% of weight

retained

% of weight passing

% of passing

specified

% of oversize/under size

22.4 mm 9.00 31.00 96.88 3.12 0 - 5 U/S Nil

Pit No.VLocation 2/4+12 L

29.50 kgs

90 mm 0.00 0.00 0.00 100.00 100 O/S Nil63 mm 5.50 5.50 18.64 81.36 90 -100 O/S 8.64 %53 mm 12.00 17.50 59.32 40.68 25 - 75 O/S Nil U/S Nil45 mm 10.50 28.00 94.92 5.08 0 - 15 U/S Nil

22.4 mm 4.00 32.00 108.47 -8.47 0 - 5 U/S Nil

Pit No.VILocation 2/8+12 R

30.00 kgs


22.4 mm 12.00 32.00 106.67 -6.67 0 - 5 U/S Nil

Pit No.VIILocation 3/4+28 L

34.00 kgs


22.4 mm 14.00 35.00 102.94 -2.94 0 - 5 U/S Nil

Pit No.VIIILocation 3/8+12 R

33.00 kgs


22.4 mm 11.60 32.10 97.27 2.73 0 - 5 U/S Nil








ANNEXURE-VRecovery Calculations for Physical Deficiencies in Grade-II Metal

Chainage

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16

1 0/0 - 1/0 75 73 3.33% 3.75 3.76 - 31.85 34.00 - 3.33% 281.25 9.37 1419.05 13296.00

2 1/0 - 2/0 75 77 - 3.75 3.74 0.40% 31.85 33.00 - 0.40% 281.25 1.13 1604.00

3 2/0 - 3/0 75 80 - 3.75 3.76 - 31.85 29.75 6.59% 6.59% 281.25 18.53 26295.00

4 3/0 - 4/0 75 79 - 3.75 3.76 - 31.85 33.50 - 0.00% 281.25 0.00 0.00

41195.00Double Recovery = 82390.00


Sl.No

Required Thickness

(mm)

Observed Thickness

(mm) Avg.

% of Deficien

cy in

Thickness

Required Width(mm)

Observed Width(mm)

% of Deficien

cy in

Width

Specified weight in (0.5X0.5 m) pit in

kgs

Observed weight in

(0.5X0.5 m) pit in kgs

Average

% of Deficiency in Weight

% of deficiency considered

for recovery

Total quantity required

(compact) cum

Deficiency Qty (cum)

Rate applicable/ (cum)

Amount of recovery in

Rs



ANNEXURE-VIRecovery Calculations for Over Size in Grade-II Metal

Sl.No Chainage

1 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11

1 0/0 - 1/0 329.88 63 mm 1.82% 100.00 97.75 1.82% 329.88 587.0053 mm 1.07% 30.00 29.33 1.07% 329.88 104.00

3 1/0 - 2/0 373.4963 mm 1.62% 100.00 97.75 1.62% 373.49 591.0053 mm 0.00% 30.00 29.33 0.00% 373.49 0.00

4 2/0 - 3/0 350.2963 mm 0.00% 100.00 97.75 0.00% 350.29 0.0053 mm 0.00% 30.00 29.33 0.00% 350.29 0.00

5 3/0 - 4/0 375.0063 mm 2.58% 100.00 97.75 2.58% 375.00 946.0053 mm 0.00% 30.00 29.33 0.00% 375.00 0.00

2228.00Double Recovery = 4456.00


Total Quantity (Loose)

Size of the Sieve

% over size (Average)

Diference cost from the next

higher size metal

Net rate including

T.P

% recovery for over size

Quantity As per Estimate

Amount of recovery in Rs


Name of Work R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)

Estimate Cost Rs.195.35 LakhsGrant NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

ANNEXURE-XIIIPhysical Observations of CC Pavement

Sl.No LocationAverage

L RKanagal village- 250.00mts.

1 30.00 200 210 208 209 3.75 3.78 250.00 245.002 60.00 200 195 205 200 3.75 3.703 90.00 200 190 201 195.5 3.75 3.824 120.00 200 196 197 196.5 3.75 3.785 150.00 200 208 200 204 3.75 3.806 180.00 200 207 185 196 3.75 3.757 210.00 200 196 198 197 3.75 3.768 240.00 200 197 194 195.5 3.75 3.75

Turkapally village- 500.00mts.1 30.00 200 210 208 209 3.75 3.78 500.00 500.002 60.00 200 214 206 210 3.75 3.753 90.00 200 204 200 202 3.75 3.824 120.00 200 196 192 194 3.75 3.785 150.00 200 208 200 204 3.75 3.806 180.00 200 207 205 206 3.75 3.757 210.00 200 200 210 205 3.75 3.658 240.00 200 199 215 207 3.75 3.759 270.00 200 200 198 199 3.75 3.78

10 300.00 200 208 200 204 3.75 3.7511 330.00 200 201 205 203 3.75 3.8212 360.00 200 200 210 205 3.75 3.7813 390.00 200 199 215 207 3.75 3.8014 420.00 200 214 206 210 3.75 3.7515 450.00 200 202 200 201 3.75 3.7616 480.00 200 200 198 199 3.75 3.75


M30 Grade Cement Concrete

Thikness Specified

in mm

Thickness Observed @ Edges Width Specified

Width Observed

Length Specified

Length Observed


Name of the Work :- :: R/F Kanagal to Thurkapally via Thimmajigudem, Kanagal (M)Estt Cost:- :: Rs.195.35 LakhsGrant :- :: NABARD RIDF XVI-Ph-II (SCP)

ANNEXURE-XIVRecovery Calculations for Physical Deficiency in CC Pavement

Sl.No Chainage Location

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19

Kanagal village- 250.00mts.1 0/0 to 0/25 30 250.00 245.00 2.00% 15308 3.75 3.78 0 0 200 209 0 0 0 22.50 4252.13 153082 60 3.75 3.70 1.33% 1276 200 197 3.50 0.00 0 22.50 12762 90 3.75 3.82 0 0 200 190 10.00 0.87 83235 22.50 832354 120 3.75 3.78 0 0 200 197 3.50 0.00 0 22.50 04 150 3.75 3.80 0 0 200 204 0 0 0 22.50 06 180 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 183 17.50 0.75 71755 22.50 717556 210 3.75 3.76 0 0 200 197 3.00 0.00 0 22.50 08 240 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 196 4.00 0.00 0 22.50 0

180.00 171574Turkapally village- 500.00mts.

1 3/5 to 4/0 30 500.00 500.00 0 0 3.75 3.78 0 0 200 209 0 0 0 22.50 4252.13 02 60 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 211 0 0 0 22.50 03 90 3.75 3.82 0 0 200 203 0 0 0 22.50 04 120 3.75 3.78 0 0 200 194 6.00 0.87 83235 22.50 832355 150 3.75 3.80 0 0 200 204 0 0 0 22.50 06 180 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 206 0 0 0 22.50 07 210 3.75 3.65 2.67% 2551 200 205 0 0 0 22.50 25518 240 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 207 0 0 0 22.50 09 270 3.75 3.78 0 0 200 199 1.00 0.00 0 22.50 0

10 300 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 204 0 0 0 22.50 011 330 3.75 3.82 0 0 200 206 0 0 0 22.50 012 360 3.75 3.78 0 0 200 205 0 0 0 22.50 013 390 3.75 3.80 0 0 200 207 0 0 0 22.50 014 420 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 211 0 0 0 22.50 015 450 3.75 3.76 0 0 200 203 0 0 0 22.50 016 480 3.75 3.75 0 0 200 199 1.00 0.00 0 22.50 0

360.00 85786


Length Specified

Length Observed

% of Deficiency

inLength

Recoveryfor

deficiency in

Length in Rs

Required Width(mm)

Observed Width(mm)

% of Deficiency

in Width

Recoveryfor deficiency

in Width in Rs

Required Thickness

(mm)

Observed Thickness

(mm) Avg.

Deficiency in

Thickness (mm)

% Unit Price Payable as per IRC 15

against deficy. in

Col.6

Recoveryfor

deficiency in

Thickness in Rs

Quantity represented (compact)

cum

Rate applicable/

(cum)

TotalRecovery

in Rs

inputs1inputs2CoverC.SlipIRGen ObsvGSB Phy A-IGSB Rec A-IIWBM Gr.II Phy Obs A-IIIWBM Gr.II Siev A-IVWBM Gr.II Phy Rec A-VWBM Gr.II OS Rec A-VICC Phy Obs A-VIICC Rec A-VIII

Documents

Model I.R._-_ GSB+WBM Gr.II+CC _ 20.01.2014