109
Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Embed Size (px)

Citation preview

Page 1: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks

Ali MovagharWinter 2009

Page 2: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Main subjects to be studied

A brief history of computer networks, Principal concepts being used in computer

networking, Applications of queueing theory to modeling

and analysis of computer communication networks

Other mathematical modeling of computer networks,

State of arts in computer networking,

Page 3: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Types of networks of particular interest

• Mobile ad hoc networks• Wireless sensor networks• Peer-to-peer networks• Overlay networks• Web

Page 4: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Textbooks

Main Textbook:• D. Bertsekas and R. Gallager, “Data Networks,” 2nd Ed.,

Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1992.

Secondary Textbooks:• A. Tanenbaum, “Computer Networks,” 4th Ed., Prentice-

Hall, Inc., 2003.• J.F. Kurose and K.W. Ross, “Computer Networking: A

top-down Approach Featuring the Internet,” Addison-Wesley, 2000.

Page 5: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Other references

• Recent papers in computer networking which have appeared in renowned national and international conferences or journals.

Page 6: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Grading Policy

• Simulation Tools: 10%

• Research Papers: 25%

• Midterm Exam: 20%

• Final Exam: 45%

Page 7: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Computer Networks and Distributed Systems

Computer networks: A collection of autonomous computers interconnected by a single technology.

Two computers are interconnected if they are able to exchange information.

Distributed Systems: A collection of independent computers which appears to its users as a single coherent system. It usually has a single model or paradigm that it presents to its users.

Often a layer of software on top of the operating system, called middleware, is responsible for implementing this model.

Page 8: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Computer Networks: A Brief History and the Future

• Why computer networking?• How was it evolved?• What is the impact of computer

networking in our life?• The Internet• Wireless mobile computing

Page 9: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

A History of Computer Systems

Mainframes (1944-)

Minicomputers (1960-)

Personal Computers and Workstations (1970-)

Page 10: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The 1st Generation: The tube-based mainframe In 1944 ENIAC (electronic numerical integrator and

calculator ) was placed in operation at the Moore School.

It had thirty separate units, plus power supply and forced-air cooling, and weighed over thirty tons.

It included 19,000 vacuum tubes, 1,500 relays, and hundreds of thousands of resistors, capacitors, and inductors consumed almost 200 kilowatts of electrical power.

ENIAC was originally used for ballistics, but played a role in the development of the atomic bomb.

Page 11: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The 2nd Generation: Transistor Computer Systems

In 1959 The fully transistorized IBM 7090 computer system delivered. The system had computing speeds up to five times faster than those of its predecessor, the IBM 709. It was both a scientific and business machine.

Page 12: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The 3rd Generation computers: Multiprocessing and operating systems make the scene

In 1965 IBM ships the midrange 360 model 40 computer which had COBOL and FORTRAN programming languages available as well as the stock Basic Assembly Language (BAL) assembler.

In 2007 IBM produces the Blue-Gene/P, a system capable of a petaflop (1,000,000 gigaflops or 1,000 teraflops). 

It sports 73,728 processors comprised of four cores each of IBM’s 850MHz PowerPC 450, resulting in 294,912 cores.

The system can be scaled to nearly three times that size, resulting in a 3 petaflop capability and is all hooked up via a high-end optical network.

Page 13: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Minicomputers

A minicomputer (colloquially, mini) is a class of multi-user computers that lies in the middle range of the computing spectrum, in between the largest multi-user systems (mainframe computers) and the smallest single-user systems (microcomputers or personal computers).

Page 14: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

A History of MinicomputersThe term "mini computer" evolved in the 1960s to describe

the "small" third generation computers that became possible with the use of transistor and core memory technologies.

They usually took up one or a few cabinets the size of a large refrigerator or two, compared with mainframes that would usually fill a room.

The first successful minicomputer was IBM’s 16-bit IBM 1130, which cost from US$32,280 upwards when launched February 11, 1965. Digital Equipment Corporation’s 12-bit PDP-8, which cost from US$16,000 upwards was launched March 22, 1965.

Page 15: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Personal Computers and Workstations

A personal computer (PC) is any computer whose original sales price, size, and capabilities make it useful for individuals, and which is intended to be operated directly by an end user, with no intervening computer operator. Throughout the late 1970s and into the 1980s, computers were developed for household use, offering personal productivity, programming and games.

Workstations are somewhat larger and more expensive systems (although still low-cost compared with minicomputers and mainframes) were aimed for office and small business use.

Page 16: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Time Sharing of Mainframes and Minicomputers

Time-sharing refers to sharing a computing resource among many users by multitasking. Because computers in interactive use often spend much of their time idly waiting for user input, it was suggested that multiple users could share a machine by allocating one user's idle time to service other users. Similarly, small slices of time spent waiting for disk, tape, or network input could be granted to other users.

Page 17: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

History of Time Sharing

The concept was first described publicly in early 1957 by Bob Bemer as part of an article in Automatic Control Magazine. The first project to implement a time-sharing system was initiated by John McCarthy in late 1957, on a modified IBM 704, and later an additionally modified IBM 7090 computer. It influenced the design of other early timesharing systems developed by Hewlett Packard, Control Data Corporation, UNIVAC and others (in addition to introducing the BASIC programming language).

Page 18: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Computer Networks

Computer networks: A collection of autonomous computers interconnected by a single technology.

Two computers are interconnected if they are able to exchange information.

Page 19: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Network Hardware

Network hardware has two important aspects: transmission technology and Scale.

There are two types of transmission technologies: broadcast and point to point (switched).

Page 20: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Broadcast Networks

Broadcast networks have a single communication channel that is shared by all the machines in the network.

Multicasting: a mode of broadcasting that supports transmission only to a subset of machines.

Page 21: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Point-to-Point (Switched) Computer Networks

Point-to-point (Switched) computer networks consist of many connections between individual pairs of machines. To go from the source to the destination, a packet must have to visit one or more intermediate machines.

Page 22: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Classification of Computer Networks by Scale

Inter-processor distance

Processors located in same

Example

1 m Square meter PAN

10 m Room LAN

100 m100 m Building LAN

1 km Campus LAN

10 km City MAN

100 km Country WAN

1000 km Continent WAN

10000 km Planet The Internet

Page 23: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Local Area Networks (LANs)

They are distinguished by their transmission technology and their topology.

Traditional LANs run at speeds 10Mbps and 100 Mbps, have low delay (microseconds or nanoseconds), and make few errors.

Newer LANs operate at up to 10 Gbps.

Page 24: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Local Area Networks (LANs) Various topologies are possible for broadcast LANs: Bus

and Ring. Examples: Ethernet (IEEE 802.3), token ring (IEEE

802.5), FDDI, Wireless LAN (IEEE 802.11).

Bus

Ring

Page 25: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Metropolitan Area Networks (MANs)

Examples: Cable television networks, DQDB, Wireless MAN (IEEE 802.16)

Page 26: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Metropolitan Area Networks

A metropolitan area network based on cable TV.

Page 27: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Wide Area Networks

Wide Area Networks or WANs consist of hosts and communication subnet.

A communication subnet consists of transmission lines and switching elements.

Page 28: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

A Taxonomy of Computer Networks

Computer networks can be classified based on the way in which the nodes exchange information

Computer Networks

BroadcastComputer Networks

SwitchedComputer Networks

Packet-SwitchedComputer Networks

Circuit-SwitchedComputer Networks

Virtual Circuit Networks

Datagram Networks

Page 29: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Broadcast vs. Switched Computer Networks

Broadcast computer networks information transmitted by any node is received by every other

node in the network examples: usually in LANs (Ethernet, Wavelan)

Problem: coordinate the access of all nodes to the shared communication medium (Multiple Access Problem)

Switched computer networks information is transmitted to a sub-set of designated nodes

examples: WANs (Telephony Network, Internet)

Problem: how to forward information to intended node(s) this is done by special nodes (e.g., routers, switches) running routing protocols

Page 30: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Circuit Switching

Three phases circuit establishment data transfer circuit termination

If circuit not available: “Busy signal” Examples

Telephone networks ISDN (Integrated Services Digital Networks)

Page 31: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Timing in Circuit Switching

DATA

Circuit Establishment

Data Transmission

Circuit Termination

Host 1 Host 2Node 1 Node 2

propagation delay between Host 1 and Node 1

propagation delay between Host 2 and Host 1

processing delay at Node 1

Page 32: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Circuit SwitchingA node (switch) in a circuit switching network

incoming links outgoing linksNode

Page 33: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Packet Switching

Data are sent as formatted bit-sequences, so-called packets. Packets have the following structure:

Header and Trailer carry control information (e.g., destination address, checksum)

Each packet is passed through the network from node to node along some path (Routing)

At each node the entire packet is received, stored briefly, and then forwarded to the next node (Store-and-Forward Networks)

Typically no capacity is allocated for packets

Header Data Trailer

Page 34: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Packet Switching

A node in a packet switching network

incoming links outgoing linksNode

Memory

Page 35: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Datagram Packet Switching

Each packet is independently switched each packet header contains destination

address

No resources are pre-allocated (reserved) in advance

Example: IP networks

Page 36: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Packet 1

Packet 2

Packet 3

Packet 1

Packet 2

Packet 3

Timing of Datagram Packet Switching

Packet 1

Packet 2

Packet 3

processing & queueingdelay of Packet 1 at Node 2

Host 1 Host 2Node 1

Node 2

propagationdelay betweenHost 1 and Node 2

transmission time of Packet 1at Host 1

Page 37: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Datagram Packet Switching

Host A

Host BHost E

Host D

Host C

Node 1 Node 2

Node 3

Node 4

Node 5

Node 6 Node 7

Page 38: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Virtual-Circuit Packet Switching

Hybrid of circuit switching and packet switching

data is transmitted as packets all packets from one packet stream are sent

along a pre-established path (=virtual circuit)

Guarantees in-sequence delivery of packets However: Packets from different virtual

circuits may be interleaved Example: ATM networks

Page 39: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Virtual-Circuit Packet Switching

Communication with virtual circuits takes place in three phases VC establishment data transfer VC disconnect

Note: packet headers don’t need to contain the full destination address of the packet

Page 40: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Packet 1

Packet 2

Packet 3

Packet 1

Packet 2

Packet 3

Timing of Virtual Circuit Packet Switching

Packet 1

Packet 2

Packet 3

Host 1 Host 2Node 1

Node 2

propagation delay between Host 1 and Node 1

VCestablishment

VCtermination

Datatransfer

Page 41: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Virtual Circuit Packet Switching

Host A

Host BHost E

Host D

Host C

Node 1 Node 2

Node 3

Node 4

Node 5

Node 6 Node 7

Page 42: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Packet-Switching vs. Circuit-Switching

Most important advantage of packet-switching over circuit switching: Ability to exploit statistical multiplexing:

efficient bandwidth usage; ratio between peek and average rate is 3:1 for audio, and 15:1 for data traffic

However, packet-switching needs to deal with congestion:

more complex routers harder to provide good network services (e.g., delay and

bandwidth guarantees) In practice they are combined:

IP over SONET, IP over Frame Relay

Page 43: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Network Software

Network Architecture

Protocol Hierarchy

Layering The number of layers The protocols defined in each layer

Page 44: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

What is Layering?

A technique to organize a network system into a succession of logically distinct entities, such that the service provided by one entity is solely based on the service provided by the previous (lower level) entity.

Page 45: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Why Layering?

No layering: each new application has to be re-implemented for every network technology!

Telnet FTP NFS

Packetradio

Coaxial cable

Fiberoptic

Application

TransmissionMedia

HTTP

Page 46: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Why Layering?

Solution: introduce an intermediate layer that provides a unique abstraction for various network technologies

Telnet FTP NFS

Packetradio

Coaxial cable

Fiberoptic

Application

TransmissionMedia

HTTP

Intermediate layer

Page 47: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Layering

Advantages: Modularity – protocols easier to manage and maintain Abstract functionality –lower layers can be changed without

affecting the upper layers Reuse – upper layers can reuse the functionality provided by

lower layers

Disadvantages: Information hiding – inefficient implementations

Page 48: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

ISO OSI Reference Model

ISO – International Standard Organization OSI – Open System Interconnection Started in 1978; first standard in 1979

ARPANET started in 1969; TCP/IP protocols ready by 1974

Goal: a general open standard Allow vendors to enter the market by using their own implementation and protocols

Page 49: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

ISO OSI Reference Model

Seven layers– Lower three layers are peer-to-peer

– Next four layers are end-to-end

Application

Presentation

Session

Transport

Network

Datalink

Physical

Application

Presentation

Session

Transport

Network

Datalink

Physical

Network

Datalink

Physical

Physical medium

Page 50: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Data Transmission

A layer can use only the service provided by the layer immediate below it

Each layer may change and add a header to data packet

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

data

Page 51: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Summary: Layering

Key technique to implement communication protocols; provides Modularity Abstraction Reuse

Key design decision: what functionality to put in each layer?

Page 52: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Reference Models

The OSI Reference Model

The TCP/IP Reference Model

A Comparison of OSI and TCP/IP

Page 53: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

OSI Model Concepts

Service – says what a layer does Interface – says how to access the service Protocol – says how is the service

implemented A set of rules and formats that govern the

communication between two peers

Page 54: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Physical Layer (1)

Service: move the information between two systems connected by a physical link Interface: specifies how to send a bit Protocol: coding scheme used to represent a bit, voltage levels, duration of a bit

Examples: coaxial cable, optical fiber links; transmitters, receivers

Page 55: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Data link Layer (2) Service:

Framing, i.e., attach frames separator Send data frames between peers attached to the same

physical media Others (optional):

Arbitrate the access to common physical media Ensure reliable transmission Provide flow control

Interface: send a data unit (packet) to a machine connected to the same physical media

Protocol: layer addresses, implement Medium Access Control (MAC) (e.g., CSMA/CD)…

Page 56: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Network Layer (3)

Service: Deliver a packet to specified destination Perform segmentation/reassemble

(fragmentation/defragmentation) Others:

Packet scheduling

Interface: send a packet to a specified destination Protocol: define global unique addresses; construct

routing tables Buffer management

Page 57: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Data and Control Planes

Data plane: concerned with Packet forwarding Buffer management Packet scheduling

Control Plane: concerned with installing and maintaining state for data plane

Page 58: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Example: Routing

Data plane: use Forwarding Table to forward packets Control plane: construct and maintain Forwarding Tables

(e.g., Distance Vector, Link State protocols)

H1H2

R1

R2

R3

R4

R5

R6

H2 R4…

H2 R6…

Fwd tableFwd table

Page 59: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Transport Layer (4) Service:

Provide an error-free and flow-controlled end-to-end connection Multiplex multiple transport connections to one network connection

Split one transport connection in multiple network connections Interface: send a packet to specify destination Protocol: implement reliability and flow control Examples: TCP and UDP

Page 60: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Session Layer (5)

Service: Full-duplex Access management, e.g., token control Synchronization, e.g., provide check points for

long transfers Interface: depends on service Protocols: token management; insert

checkpoints, implement roll-back functions

Page 61: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Presentation Layer (6)

Service: convert data between various representations Interface: depends on service Protocol: define data formats, and rules to convert from one format to another

Page 62: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Application Layer (7)

Service: any service provided to the end user Interface: depends on the application Protocol: depends on the application

Examples: FTP, Telnet, WWW browser

Page 63: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Summary: Layering

Key technique to implement communication protocols; provides Modularity Abstraction Reuse

Key design decision: what functionality to put in each layer?

Page 64: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Design Issues for the Layers

• Addressing• Error Control• Flow Control• Multiplexing• Routing

Page 65: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Connection-Oriented and Connectionless Services

Six different types of service.

Page 66: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Service Primitives

Five service primitives for implementing a simple connection-oriented service.

Page 67: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Service Primitives (2)

Packets sent in a simple client-server interaction on a connection-oriented network.

Page 68: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Services to Protocols Relationship

The relationship between a service and a protocol.

Page 69: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Reference Models (2)

The TCP/IP reference model.

Page 70: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Reference Models (3)

Protocols and networks in the TCP/IP model initially.

Page 71: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Comparing OSI and TCP/IP Models

Concepts central to the OSI model

• Services

• Interfaces

• Protocols

Page 72: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

A Critique of the OSI Model and Protocols

Why OSI did not take over the world

• Bad timing

• Bad technology

• Bad implementations

• Bad politics

Page 73: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Bad Timing

The apocalypse of the two elephants.

Page 74: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

A Critique of the TCP/IP Reference Model

Problems:• Service, interface, and protocol not distinguished• Not a general model• Host-to-network “layer” not really a layer• No mention of physical and data link layers• Minor protocols deeply entrenched, hard to replace

Page 75: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Hybrid Model

The hybrid reference model to be used in this book.

Page 76: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Example Networks

• The Internet

• Connection-Oriented Networks: X.25, Frame Relay, and ATM

• Ethernet

• Wireless LANs: 802:11

Page 77: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The ARPANET

(a) Structure of the telephone system.(b) Baran’s proposed distributed switching system.

Page 78: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The ARPANET

The original ARPANET design.

Page 79: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The ARPANET

Growth of the ARPANET (a) December 1969. (b) July 1970.(c) March 1971. (d) April 1972. (e) September 1972.

Page 80: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

NSFNET

The NSFNET backbone in 1988.

Page 81: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Traditional Internet Usage (1970-1990)

E-mail

News

Remote login

File transfer

Page 82: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Services Provided by the Internet

Shared access to computing resources Telnet (1970’s)

Shared access to data/files FTP, NFS, AFS (1980’s)

Communication medium over which people interact Email (1980’s), on-line chat rooms, instant messaging (1990’s) Audio, video (1990’s)

Replacing telephone network? A medium for information dissemination

USENET (1980’s) WWW (1990’s)

Replacing newspaper, magazine? Audio, video (2000’s)

Replacing radio, CD, TV?

Page 83: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Architecture of the Internet

Overview of the Internet.

Page 84: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The Internet

Global scale, general purpose, heterogeneous-technologies, public, computer network

Internet Protocol Open standard: Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF)

as standard body Technical basis for other types of networks

Intranet: enterprise IP network

Developed by the research community

Page 85: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

History of the Internet 70’s: started as a research project, 56 kbps, < 100

computers 80-83: ARPANET and MILNET split, 85-86: NSF builds NSFNET as backbone, links 6

Supercomputer centers, 1.5 Mbps, 10,000 computers 87-90: link regional networks, NSI (NASA),

ESNet(DOE), DARTnet, TWBNet (DARPA), 100,000 computers

90-92: NSFNET moves to 45 Mbps, 16 mid-level networks

94: NSF backbone dismantled, multiple private backbones

Today: backbones run at 10 Gbps, 10s millions computers in 150 countries

Page 86: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Time Line of the Internet

•Source: Internet Society

Page 87: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Growth of the Internet

Number of Hosts on the Internet:

Aug. 1981 213Oct. 1984 1,024Dec. 1987 28,174 Oct. 1990 313,000 Oct. 1993 2,056,000Apr. 1995 5,706,000Jul. 1997 19,540,000Jul. 1999 56,218,000Jul. 2001 125,888,197Jul. 2002 162,128,493

1

10

100

1000

10000

100000

1000000

10000000

100000000

1000000000

1981 1984 1987 1990 1993 1996 1999 2002

Page 88: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Recent Growth (1991-2002)

Page 89: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Internet Users 1995-2004

DATE NUMBER OF USERS % WORLD

POPULATION INFORMATION

SOURCE

December, 1995 16 millions 0.4 % IDC

December, 1996 36 millions 0.9 % IDC

December, 1997 70 millions 1.7 % IDC

December, 1998 147 millions 3.6 % C.I. Almanac

December, 1999 248 millions 4.1 % Nua Ltd.

March, 2000 304 millions 5.0 % Nua Ltd.

July, 2000 359 millions 5.9 % Nua Ltd.

December, 2000 361 millions 5.8 % Internet World Stats

March, 2001 458 millions 7.6 % Nua Ltd.

June, 2001 479 millions 7.9 % Nua Ltd.

August, 2001 513 millions 8.6 % Nua Ltd.

April, 2002 558 millions 8.6 % Internet World Stats

July, 2002 569 millions 9.1 % Internet World Stats

September, 2002 587 millions 9.4 % Internet World Stats

March, 2003 608 millions 9.7 % Internet World Stats

September, 2003 677 millions 10.6 % Internet World Stats

October, 2003 682 millions 10.7 % Internet World Stats

December, 2003 719 millions 11.1 % Internet World Stats

February, 2004 745 millions 11.5 % Internet World Stats

May, 2004 757 millions 11.7 % Internet World Stats

October, 2004 812 millions 12.7 % Internet World Stats

December, 2004 817 millions 12.7 % Internet World Stats

Page 90: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Internet Users 2005-2008

DATE NUMBER OF USERS % WORLD

POPULATION INFORMATION

SOURCE

March, 2005 888 millions 13.9 % Internet World Stats

June, 2005 938 millions 14.6 % Internet World Stats

September, 2005 957 millions 14.9 % Internet World Stats

November, 2005 972 millions 15.2 % Internet World Stats

December, 2005 1,018 millions 15.7 % Internet World Stats

March, 2006 1,023 millions 15.7 % Internet World Stats

June, 2006 1,043 millions 16.0 % Internet World Stats

Sept, 2006 1,086 millions 16.7 % Internet World Stats

Dec, 2006 1,093 millions 16.7 % Internet World Stats

Mar, 2007 1,129 millions 17.2 % Internet World Stats

June, 2007 1,173 millions 17.8 % Internet World Stats

Sept, 2007 1,245 millions 18.9 % Internet World Stats

Dec, 2007 1,319 millions 20.0 % Internet World Stats

Mar, 2008 1,407 millions 21.1 % Internet World Stats

June, 2008 1,463 millions 21.9 % Internet World Stats

Page 91: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Recent Growth (1995-2008)

Page 92: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Internet Physical Infrastructure

BackboneISP

ISP

Residential Access– Modem– DSL– Cable modem– Satellite

Enterprise/ISP access,

Backbone transmission– T1/T3, DS-1 DS-3– OC-3, OC-12

– ATM vs. SONET, vs. WDM

Campus network– Ethernet, ATM

Internet Service Providers– access, regional, backbone– Point of Presence (POP)– Network Access Point (NAP)

Page 93: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Who is Who in the Internet ? Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF): The IETF is

the protocol engineering and development arm of the Internet. Subdivided into many working groups, which specify Request For Comments or RFCs.

IRTF (Internet Research Task Force): The Internet Research Task Force is a composed of a number of focused, long-term and small Research Groups.

Internet Architecture Board (IAB): The IAB is responsible for defining the overall architecture of the Internet, providing guidance and broad direction to the IETF.

The Internet Engineering Steering Group (IESG): The IESG is responsible for technical management of IETF activities and the Internet standards process. Standards. Composed of the Area Directors of the IETF working groups.

Page 94: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Internet Standardization Process

All standards of the Internet are published as RFC (Request for Comments). But not all RFCs are Internet Standards !

available: http://www.ietf.org A typical (but not only) way of standardization is:

Internet Drafts RFC Proposed Standard Draft Standard (requires 2 working implementation) Internet Standard (declared by IAB)

David Clark, MIT, 1992: "We reject: kings, presidents, and voting. We believe in: rough consensus and running code.”

Page 95: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009
Page 96: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009
Page 97: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009
Page 98: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

ATM Virtual Circuits

A virtual circuit.

Page 99: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

ATM Virtual Circuits (2)

An ATM cell.

Page 100: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The ATM Reference Model

The ATM reference model.

Page 101: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

The ATM Reference Model (2)

The ATM layers and sublayers and their functions.

Page 102: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Ethernet

Architecture of the original Ethernet.

Page 103: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Wireless LANs

(a) Wireless networking with a base station.(b) Ad hoc networking.

Page 104: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Wireless LANs (2)

The range of a single radio may not cover the entire system.

Page 105: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Wireless LANs (3)

A multicell 802.11 network.

Page 106: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Network Standardization

• Who’s Who in the Telecommunications World• Who’s Who in the International Standards World• Who’s Who in the Internet Standards World

Page 107: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

ITU

• Main sectors• Radio communications• Tele-communications Standardization• Development

• Classes of Members• National governments• Sector members• Associate members• Regulatory agencies

Page 108: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

IEEE 802 Standards

The 802 working groups. The important ones are marked with *. The ones marked with are hibernating. The one marked with † gave up.

Page 109: Modeling and Analysis of Computer Networks Ali Movaghar Winter 2009

Metric Units

The principal metric prefixes.