Upload
constance-bradford
View
222
Download
1
Embed Size (px)
Citation preview
Modelling Language EvolutionLecture 1: Introduction to Learning
Simon Kirby
University of Edinburgh
Language Evolution & Computation Research Unit
Course Overview
Learning Introduction to neural nets Learning syntax
Evolution Syntax Learning bias and structure
Culture Iterated learning The Talking Heads (practical)
Computers for modelling
Computers in linguistics Engineering (speech and language technologies) Research tools (waveform analysis, psycholinguistic
stimuli etc.) Recently: modelling building
Why build models?Why use computers?What is a model anyway?
What is a model?
One view:
We use models when we can’t be sure what our theories predict
Especially useful when dealing with complex systems
THEORY
MODEL
PREDICTION
OBSERVATION
A simple example
Vowels exist in a “space”
Only some patterns arise cross-linguistically E.g. vowel space seems to be symmetrically filled Why?
Theory to Model
We need a theory to explain vowel-space universalPossible theory:
Vowels tend to avoid being close to each other to maintain perceptual distinctiveness.
Use model to test theory (Liljencrants & Lindblom 1972)
In general, computational modelsare useful when dealing with“complex systems”
Is language a complex system?
Culturalevolution
Individual learning
Biological evolution
Yes – evolution on many different timescales:
Computational models will help us understand these interactions…
Learning
Language learning is crucial to language evolution What is learning?
Learning occurs when an organism changes its internal state on the basis of experience
What do we need to model learning?1. a model of internal states
2. A model of experience
3. An algorithm to change 1 into 2
One approach: Neural nets
An approach to internal states based on the brain
An artificial neuron is a computational unit that sums inputs and uses them to decide whether to produce an output
Networks of neurons
Typically there will be many connected neurons
Information is stored in weights on the connectionsWeights multiply signals sent between nodesSignals into a node can be excitatory or inhibitory
An artificial neuron
Add up all the inputs multiplied by their weightsf(net) is the “activation function” that scales the input
j
jiji awnet
A useful activation function
All or nothing for big excitations or inhibitions…… but more sensitive in between.
ineti ea
1
1
AND: a very simple network
A network that works out if both inputs are activated:
INPUT 1 INPUT 2
BIAS NODE(always set to 1.0)
OUTPUT
5 5
-7.5
Network gives an output over 0.5 only if both inputs are 1.
OR: another very simple network
A network that works out if either input is activated:
INPUT 1 INPUT 2
BIAS NODE(always set to 1.0)
OUTPUT
10 10
-7.5
Network gives an output over 0.5 if either input is 1.
XOR: a difficult challenge
A network that works out if only one input is activated:
INPUT 1 INPUT 2
BIAS NODE(always set to 1.0)
OUTPUT
? ?
?
Solution needs more complex net with three layers. WHY?
XOR network - step 1
XOR is the same as OR but not AND Calculate OR Calculate NOT AND AND the results
NOT AND OR
AND
XOR network - step 2
OUTPUTBIAS NODE
HIDDEN 1 HIDDEN 2
INPUT 1 INPUT 2
10
10
-7.5
-5-5
7.5
5 5
-7.5
NOT AND OR
AND
But what about learning?
We now have: a model of internal states (connection weights) a model of experience (inputs and outputs)
Learning: set the weights in response to experience
How? Compare network behaviour with “correct” behaviour Adjust the weights to reduce network error
Error-driven learning
1. Set weights to random values2. Present input pattern3. Feed-forward activation through the network to get
an output4. Calculate difference between output and desired
output (i.e. error)5. Adjust weights so that the error is reduced6. Repeat until network is producing the desired
results.
Gradient descent
Gradient descent is a form of error-driven learning Start on random point of “error surface” Move on surface in direction of steepest slope Potential problems:
May overshoot the global minimum Might get stuck in local minimum
Example: learning past tense of verbs
Network that takes present tense form of verb… …and produces past tense.
Uses examples to set weights Generalises to add /-ed/ to verbs it’s never seen before. Has it learnt a linguistic rule?
Is this psychologically plausible?
We need an error signalWhere does this error signal come from?Possibilities:
A teacher Reinforcement The outcome of some prediction:
e.g. what’s the next word? what’s the past tense of this verb?